| Topic: |
Religions > Atheism |
| User: |
"J Young" |
| Date: |
12 Apr 2005 02:04:11 PM |
| Object: |
Protest at Mass for John Paul |
Protest at Mass for John Paul
Any swine who would disturb a solemn ceremony, such as a mass for Pope
John Paul II, should be prosecuted to the full extent of the law. Or is
that treatment reserved for anti-abortion protestors only?
http://www.post-gazette.com/pg/05102/486807.stm
Protest at Mass for John Paul
Presiding cardinal had resigned in Boston sex-abuse cover-up
Tuesday, April 12, 2005
VATICAN CITY -- The sermon that Cardinal Bernard Law preached in St.
Peter's Basilica was not political but theological, self-effacing and
appropriate for a funeral. That did nothing to calm the outrage from
victims of childhood sexual abuse by priests, who said that the man who
was forced to resign from the Archdiocese of Boston for protecting such
priests should not offer one of the nine official Masses for Pope John
Paul II.
.
|
|
| User: "Loose Cannon" |
|
| Title: Re: Protest at Mass for John Paul |
12 Apr 2005 02:45:32 PM |
|
|
"J Young" <youngopinions@aol.com> wrote in message
news:1113314651.509292.212790@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com...
Protest at Mass for John Paul
Any swine who would disturb a solemn ceremony, such as a mass for Pope
John Paul II, should be prosecuted to the full extent of the law. Or is
that treatment reserved for anti-abortion protestors only?
http://www.post-gazette.com/pg/05102/486807.stm
Leave it to "J/IBen" to support a disgraced pedophile-hiding priest.
Of course, this is the same troll that posted:
"We are going to demand that the federal gov't give funds to this fine
organization.
Instead of funding wars overseas; why not fund us people who want to
spread a little love.NAMBLA is all about togetherness and comforting
our young people with guidance from an older generation Please help
us." ~ Spamming troll "JYoung", posting from one of his many AOL socks.
Subject: Federal funds for NAMBLA
Date: 10 Mar 2004 09:44:11 -0800
LC~ More monkey-spanking from looney "J".
"Why is it okay to kill a baby ,but not okay to f*ck him or her?"~ JYoung,
NAMBLA supporter.
From: (Jon Young)
Message-ID: <25e1e54f.0404252034.356729e@posting.google.com>
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Harry" |
|
| Title: Re: Protest at Mass for John Paul |
12 Apr 2005 08:09:14 PM |
|
|
"J Young" <youngopinions@aol.com> wrote in message
news:1113314651.509292.212790@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com...
Protest at Mass for John Paul
Any swine who would disturb a solemn ceremony, such as a mass for Pope
John Paul II, should be prosecuted to the full extent of the law. Or is
that treatment reserved for anti-abortion protestors only?
What about the priests that buggered these children?
Why did the church hide and protect them, and why weren't *they* prosecuted
to the full extent of the law????
Fucking hypocrite *****.
Although you probably enjoyed sucking off the padre.
----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Lazarus" |
|
| Title: Re: Protest at Mass for John Paul |
12 Apr 2005 03:07:40 PM |
|
|
"J Young" <youngopinions@aol.com> wrote...
Protest at Mass for John Paul
Any swine who would disturb a solemn ceremony, such as a mass for Pope
John Paul II, should be prosecuted to the full extent of the law. Or is
that treatment reserved for anti-abortion protestors only?
Cardinal Bernhard Law's presiding over a memorial mass for JPII is a slap in
the face on everyone who was sexually abused by priests working in his
archdiocese. The fact that the Vatican gave him a cushy job in Rome with a
fat salary is obscene. That fat fucker should be in jail for conspiring to
cover up the sexual abuse of children by priests under his supervision.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Robert J. Kolker" |
|
| Title: Re: Protest at Mass for John Paul |
12 Apr 2005 03:09:53 PM |
|
|
Lazarus wrote:
Cardinal Bernhard Law's presiding over a memorial mass for JPII is a slap in
the face on everyone who was sexually abused by priests working in his
archdiocese. The fact that the Vatican gave him a cushy job in Rome with a
fat salary is obscene. That fat fucker should be in jail for conspiring to
cover up the sexual abuse of children by priests under his supervision.
It would be very interesting if the College of Cardinals elected Bernard
Law as the next Pope just to stick it to the Americans. I think that
would be a splendid joke on the world. The Pope from NAMBLA.
Bob Kolker
.
|
|
|
| User: "Harry" |
|
| Title: Re: Protest at Mass for John Paul |
12 Apr 2005 08:11:49 PM |
|
|
"Robert J. Kolker" <nowhere@nowhere.com> wrote in message
news:3c26m5F6h1jpfU1@individual.net...
Lazarus wrote:
Cardinal Bernhard Law's presiding over a memorial mass for JPII is a slap
in
the face on everyone who was sexually abused by priests working in his
archdiocese. The fact that the Vatican gave him a cushy job in Rome
with a
fat salary is obscene. That fat fucker should be in jail for conspiring
to
cover up the sexual abuse of children by priests under his supervision.
It would be very interesting if the College of Cardinals elected Bernard
Law as the next Pope just to stick it to the Americans. I think that would
be a splendid joke on the world. The Pope from NAMBLA.
Bob Kolker
Law already has presided over enough 'sticking it to Americans'.
Unfortunatly they tended to be very young Americans.
----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "J Young" |
|
| Title: Re: Protest at Mass for John Paul |
13 Apr 2005 02:04:15 PM |
|
|
Lazarus wrote:
"J Young" <youngopinions@aol.com> wrote...
Protest at Mass for John Paul
Any swine who would disturb a solemn ceremony, such as a mass for
Pope
John Paul II, should be prosecuted to the full extent of the law.
Or is
that treatment reserved for anti-abortion protestors only?
Cardinal Bernhard Law's presiding over a memorial mass for JPII is a
slap in
the face on everyone who was sexually abused by priests working in
his
archdiocese. The fact that the Vatican gave him a cushy job in Rome
with a
fat salary is obscene. That fat fucker should be in jail for
conspiring to
cover up the sexual abuse of children by priests under his
supervision.
I wasn't passing judgement on Cardinal Law, I was addressing people who
would disrupt a solemn ceremony for the recently deceased pontiff.
There are other occasions more appropriate for protest.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Lazarus" |
|
| Title: Re: Protest at Mass for John Paul |
13 Apr 2005 02:30:37 PM |
|
|
"J Young" <youngopinions@aol.com> wrote...
Lazarus wrote:
"J Young" <youngopinions@aol.com> wrote...
Protest at Mass for John Paul
Any swine who would disturb a solemn ceremony, such as a mass for
Pope John Paul II, should be prosecuted to the full extent of the law.
Or is that treatment reserved for anti-abortion protestors only?
Cardinal Bernhard Law's presiding over a memorial mass for JPII is a
slap in the face on everyone who was sexually abused by priests working
in his archdiocese. The fact that the Vatican gave him a cushy job in
Rome with a fat salary is obscene. That fat fucker should be in jail
for
conspiring to cover up the sexual abuse of children by priests under his
supervision.
I wasn't passing judgement on Cardinal Law, I was addressing people who
would disrupt a solemn ceremony for the recently deceased pontiff.
That is SO magnanimous of you to reserve judgement on Cardinal Law, in spite
of clear evidence that he conspired to cover up for priests who sexually
abused children while working in his archdiocese. And yet, despite the
complete absence of evidence that these protesters disrupted the memorial
mass, you condemn them. But then, consistency was never your strong suit,
IBen.
There are other occasions more appropriate for protest.
Sez who?
.
|
|
|
| User: "J Young" |
|
| Title: Re: Protest at Mass for John Paul |
13 Apr 2005 03:24:37 PM |
|
|
Lazarus wrote:
"J Young" <youngopinions@aol.com> wrote...
Lazarus wrote:
"J Young" <youngopinions@aol.com> wrote...
Protest at Mass for John Paul
Any swine who would disturb a solemn ceremony, such as a mass
for
Pope John Paul II, should be prosecuted to the full extent of
the law.
Or is that treatment reserved for anti-abortion protestors
only?
Cardinal Bernhard Law's presiding over a memorial mass for JPII
is a
slap in the face on everyone who was sexually abused by priests
working
in his archdiocese. The fact that the Vatican gave him a cushy
job in
Rome with a fat salary is obscene. That fat fucker should be in
jail
for
conspiring to cover up the sexual abuse of children by priests
under his
supervision.
I wasn't passing judgement on Cardinal Law, I was addressing people
who
would disrupt a solemn ceremony for the recently deceased pontiff.
That is SO magnanimous of you to reserve judgement on Cardinal Law,
in spite
of clear evidence that he conspired to cover up for priests who
sexually
abused children while working in his archdiocese. And yet, despite
the
complete absence of evidence that these protesters disrupted the
memorial
mass, you condemn them. But then, consistency was never your strong
suit,
IBen.
There are other occasions more appropriate for protest.
Sez who?
When you resort to name calling is when I know you no longer can
present a viable argument. Thankyou.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Loose Cannon" |
|
| Title: Re: Protest at Mass for John Paul |
13 Apr 2005 05:04:29 PM |
|
|
"J Young" <youngopinions@aol.com> wrote in message
news:1113405877.010438.91800@l41g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
Lazarus wrote:
"J Young" <youngopinions@aol.com> wrote...
Lazarus wrote:
<snip>
I wasn't passing judgement on Cardinal Law, I was addressing people
who would disrupt a solemn ceremony for the recently deceased pontiff.
That is SO magnanimous of you to reserve judgement on Cardinal Law,
in spite of clear evidence that he conspired to cover up for priests who
sexually abused children while working in his archdiocese. And yet,
despite the complete absence of evidence that these protesters disrupted
the memorial mass, you condemn them. But then, consistency was never your
strong suit, IBen.
There are other occasions more appropriate for protest.
Sez who?
When you resort to name calling is when I know you no longer can
present a viable argument. Thankyou.
Got irony, IBen?
LC~ "J" isn't fooling anyone but himself.
"Ahhh.... some of my finest works (under this nick anyway). Stats never
lie, John. But sometimes certain people people like to lie
to themselves. What group do you fit into?"
From: (IBen Getiner/JYoung)
Message-ID: <4004-3AB1D4F6-108@storefull-293.iap.bryant.webtv.net>
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Lazarus" |
|
| Title: Re: Protest at Mass for John Paul |
13 Apr 2005 06:32:07 PM |
|
|
"J Young" <youngopinions@aol.com> wrote...
Lazarus wrote:
That is SO magnanimous of you to reserve judgement on Cardinal Law,
in spite of clear evidence that he conspired to cover up for priests who
sexually abused children while working in his archdiocese. And yet,
despite the complete absence of evidence that these protesters disrupted
the memorial mass, you condemn them. But then, consistency was never
your strong suit, IBen.
[...]
When you resort to name calling is when I know you no longer can
present a viable argument. Thankyou.
"Infant slaying fiend. Consider yourself lucky that you got
this much of my time. Otherwise I spit on you, you arrogant
boll-weeviled rat turd." -- JYoung/IBen, in
Message-ID:
You're such a fucking hypocrite, IBen.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Mickey" |
|
| Title: Re: Protest at Mass for John Paul |
13 Apr 2005 06:08:17 PM |
|
|
J Young wrote:
Lazarus wrote:
"J Young" <youngopinions@aol.com> wrote...
Protest at Mass for John Paul
Any swine who would disturb a solemn ceremony, such as a mass for
Pope
John Paul II, should be prosecuted to the full extent of the law.
Or is
that treatment reserved for anti-abortion protestors only?
Cardinal Bernhard Law's presiding over a memorial mass for JPII is
a
slap in
the face on everyone who was sexually abused by priests working in
his
archdiocese. The fact that the Vatican gave him a cushy job in
Rome
with a
fat salary is obscene. That fat fucker should be in jail for
conspiring to
cover up the sexual abuse of children by priests under his
supervision.
I wasn't passing judgement on Cardinal Law, I was addressing people
who
would disrupt a solemn ceremony for the recently deceased pontiff.
There are other occasions more appropriate for protest.
I have seen some rubbish posted on UseNet, but this may come close to
the worst piece of anti-logic ever displayed on such. By this
"reasoning", no one should have protested had Adolph Hitler held a mass
for this pope? This "cardinal" is an abomination, and this pope, who I
admired in many ways, did nothing to put a stop to Law's supporting of
child molestors.
As they say in Russia, tuffki shitski.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "CB" |
|
| Title: Re: Protest at Mass for John Paul |
12 Apr 2005 02:23:40 PM |
|
|
On 12 Apr 2005 07:04:11 -0700, "J Young" <youngopinions@aol.com> wrote:
Protest at Mass for John Paul
Any swine who would disturb a solemn ceremony, such as a mass for Pope
John Paul II, should be prosecuted to the full extent of the law. Or is
that treatment reserved for anti-abortion protestors only?
Any swine who would molest or tolerate the molestation of children should be
prosecuted to the full extent of the law, and then some.
"Life may not be the party we hoped for, but while we are here we might as well dance."
Author Unknown
.
|
|
|
| User: "bam" |
|
| Title: Re: Protest at Mass for John Paul |
12 Apr 2005 09:39:57 PM |
|
|
"CB" <country2000@hotmail.com> wrote
Any swine who would molest or tolerate the molestation of children should
be
prosecuted to the full extent of the law, and then some.
Of course, if we were saying that Bush or Rumsfeld should be prosecuted for
the perversions at Abu Ghraib, Danny will jump to the other side of the
see-saw.
Danny has his loves and his hates - why no one knows. But the ones he loves
are always innocent and the ones he hates are always guilty. Evidence is not
a factor.
BAM
.
|
|
|
| User: "Paul Duca" |
|
| Title: Re: Protest at Mass for John Paul |
13 Apr 2005 07:00:48 AM |
|
|
in article OdX6e.70017$wo1.8193@bignews6.bellsouth.net, bam at
mcca5761@bellsouthblahblah.net wrote on 4/12/05 5:39 PM:
"CB" <country2000@hotmail.com> wrote
Any swine who would molest or tolerate the molestation of children should
be
prosecuted to the full extent of the law, and then some.
Of course, if we were saying that Bush or Rumsfeld should be prosecuted for
the perversions at Abu Ghraib, Danny will jump to the other side of the
see-saw.
Sounds like YOU didn't listen to the Pope when he said war in Iraq
was wrong...so shut your gob about being a model Catholic
Paul
.
|
|
|
| User: "bam" |
|
| Title: Re: Protest at Mass for John Paul |
13 Apr 2005 01:20:00 PM |
|
|
"Paul Duca" <p.duca@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:BE823BE0.1853D%p.duca@comcast.net...
in article OdX6e.70017$wo1.8193@bignews6.bellsouth.net, bam at
mcca5761@bellsouthblahblah.net wrote on 4/12/05 5:39 PM:
"CB" <country2000@hotmail.com> wrote
Any swine who would molest or tolerate the molestation of children
should
be
prosecuted to the full extent of the law, and then some.
Of course, if we were saying that Bush or Rumsfeld should be prosecuted
for
the perversions at Abu Ghraib, Danny will jump to the other side of the
see-saw.
Sounds like YOU didn't listen to the Pope when he said war in Iraq
was wrong...so shut your gob about being a model Catholic
I'm against the war - aren't you sick of being wrong?
NA<
.
|
|
|
| User: "Paul Duca" |
|
| Title: Re: Protest at Mass for John Paul |
14 Apr 2005 01:48:12 AM |
|
|
in article gW87e.54714$f%4.26054@bignews1.bellsouth.net, bam at
mcca5761@bellsouthblahblah.net wrote on 4/13/05 9:20 AM:
"Paul Duca" <p.duca@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:BE823BE0.1853D%p.duca@comcast.net...
in article OdX6e.70017$wo1.8193@bignews6.bellsouth.net, bam at
mcca5761@bellsouthblahblah.net wrote on 4/12/05 5:39 PM:
"CB" <country2000@hotmail.com> wrote
Any swine who would molest or tolerate the molestation of children
should
be
prosecuted to the full extent of the law, and then some.
Of course, if we were saying that Bush or Rumsfeld should be prosecuted
for
the perversions at Abu Ghraib, Danny will jump to the other side of the
see-saw.
Sounds like YOU didn't listen to the Pope when he said war in Iraq
was wrong...so shut your gob about being a model Catholic
I'm against the war - aren't you sick of being wrong?
I am glad I'm not as stupid overall as you are, Bam.
Paul
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Protest at Mass for John Paul |
12 Apr 2005 06:22:24 PM |
|
|
CB wrote:
"Any swine who would molest or tolerate the molestation of children
should be
prosecuted to the full extent of the law, and then some."
Well, this is a first. I, a practicing Catholic, agree with CB. I was
embarrassed for the Church that Cardinal Law was chosen to celebrate
the Mass.
***** Durbin
.
|
|
|
| User: "MarkA" |
|
| Title: Re: Protest at Mass for John Paul |
12 Apr 2005 09:37:28 PM |
|
|
On Tue, 12 Apr 2005 11:22:24 -0700, ddurbin wrote:
CB wrote:
"Any swine who would molest or tolerate the molestation of children should
be
prosecuted to the full extent of the law, and then some."
Well, this is a first. I, a practicing Catholic, agree with CB. I was
embarrassed for the Church that Cardinal Law was chosen to celebrate the
Mass.
***** Durbin
It's not like the RCC has ever felt obliged to answer to anyone, except
God. And, since they are the ones in charge of defining what God wants,
they can pretty much write their own rule book, can't they?
--
MarkA
(still caught in the maze of twisty little passages, all different)
.
|
|
|
| User: "CB" |
|
| Title: Re: Protest at Mass for John Paul |
13 Apr 2005 04:08:35 AM |
|
|
On Tue, 12 Apr 2005 21:37:28 GMT, MarkA <manthony@stopspam.net> wrote:
On Tue, 12 Apr 2005 11:22:24 -0700, ddurbin wrote:
CB wrote:
"Any swine who would molest or tolerate the molestation of children should
be
prosecuted to the full extent of the law, and then some."
Well, this is a first. I, a practicing Catholic, agree with CB. I was
embarrassed for the Church that Cardinal Law was chosen to celebrate the
Mass.
***** Durbin
It's not like the RCC has ever felt obliged to answer to anyone, except
God. And, since they are the ones in charge of defining what God wants,
they can pretty much write their own rule book, can't they?
LOL!!!
Sorry but God did not leave His church in the hands of apostates.
"Life may not be the party we hoped for, but while we are here we might as well dance."
Author Unknown
.
|
|
|
| User: "Wortenheimer" |
|
| Title: Re: Protest at Mass for John Paul |
13 Apr 2005 04:10:49 AM |
|
|
"CB" <country2000@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:so6p511l11p0mr3t2bpopv48t3ic33l2m6@4ax.com...
On Tue, 12 Apr 2005 21:37:28 GMT, MarkA <manthony@stopspam.net> wrote:
It's not like the RCC has ever felt obliged to answer to anyone, except
God. And, since they are the ones in charge of defining what God wants,
they can pretty much write their own rule book, can't they?
LOL!!!
Sorry but God did not leave His church in the hands of apostates.
man created god in his own image. in other words god does not exist except
in the minds of men. you're all delusional.
.
|
|
|
| User: "bam" |
|
| Title: Re: Protest at Mass for John Paul |
13 Apr 2005 01:34:19 PM |
|
|
"Wortenheimer" <worten@heimer.com> wrote in message
news:z8qdnY8srfVYBsHfRVn-pQ@comcast.com...
"CB" <country2000@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:so6p511l11p0mr3t2bpopv48t3ic33l2m6@4ax.com...
On Tue, 12 Apr 2005 21:37:28 GMT, MarkA <manthony@stopspam.net> wrote:
It's not like the RCC has ever felt obliged to answer to anyone, except
God. And, since they are the ones in charge of defining what God wants,
they can pretty much write their own rule book, can't they?
LOL!!!
Sorry but God did not leave His church in the hands of apostates.
man created god in his own image. in other words god does not exist
except in the minds of men. you're all delusional.
Psa 14:1 The fool hath said in his heart: There is no God.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Robibnikoff" |
|
| Title: Re: Protest at Mass for John Paul |
13 Apr 2005 01:45:26 PM |
|
|
"bam" <mcca5761@bellsouthblahblah.net> wrote in message
news:H797e.54717$f%4.48306@bignews1.bellsouth.net...
"Wortenheimer" <worten@heimer.com> wrote in message
news:z8qdnY8srfVYBsHfRVn-pQ@comcast.com...
"CB" <country2000@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:so6p511l11p0mr3t2bpopv48t3ic33l2m6@4ax.com...
On Tue, 12 Apr 2005 21:37:28 GMT, MarkA <manthony@stopspam.net> wrote:
It's not like the RCC has ever felt obliged to answer to anyone, except
God. And, since they are the ones in charge of defining what God
wants,
they can pretty much write their own rule book, can't they?
LOL!!!
Sorry but God did not leave His church in the hands of apostates.
man created god in his own image. in other words god does not exist
except in the minds of men. you're all delusional.
Psa 14:1 The fool hath said in his heart: There is no God.
A wise person says it out loud.
--
------
Robyn
Resident Witchypoo
#1557
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "thomas p" |
|
| Title: Re: Protest at Mass for John Paul |
14 Apr 2005 06:16:50 PM |
|
|
On Wed, 13 Apr 2005 09:34:19 -0400, "bam"
<mcca5761@bellsouthblahblah.net> wrote:
"Wortenheimer" <worten@heimer.com> wrote in message
news:z8qdnY8srfVYBsHfRVn-pQ@comcast.com...
"CB" <country2000@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:so6p511l11p0mr3t2bpopv48t3ic33l2m6@4ax.com...
On Tue, 12 Apr 2005 21:37:28 GMT, MarkA <manthony@stopspam.net> wrote:
It's not like the RCC has ever felt obliged to answer to anyone, except
God. And, since they are the ones in charge of defining what God wants,
they can pretty much write their own rule book, can't they?
LOL!!!
Sorry but God did not leave His church in the hands of apostates.
man created god in his own image. in other words god does not exist
except in the minds of men. you're all delusional.
Psa 14:1 The fool hath said in his heart: There is no God.
And the good witch told Dorothy to follow the yellow brick road.
Thomas P.
"Life must be lived forwards but understood backwards"
(Kierkegaard)
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Ray Fischer" |
|
| Title: Re: Protest at Mass for John Paul |
13 Apr 2005 02:15:30 PM |
|
|
bam <mcca5761@bellsouthblahblah.net> wrote:
"Wortenheimer" <worten@heimer.com> wrote in message
"CB" <country2000@hotmail.com> wrote in message
On Tue, 12 Apr 2005 21:37:28 GMT, MarkA <manthony@stopspam.net> wrote:
It's not like the RCC has ever felt obliged to answer to anyone, except
God. And, since they are the ones in charge of defining what God wants,
they can pretty much write their own rule book, can't they?
LOL!!!
Sorry but God did not leave His church in the hands of apostates.
man created god in his own image. in other words god does not exist
except in the minds of men. you're all delusional.
Psa 14:1 The fool hath said in his heart: There is no God.
Mat 5:22 but whosoever shall say, Thou fool, shall be in danger of
hell fire.
--
Ray Fischer
rfischer@sonic.net
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Robert J. Kolker" |
|
| Title: Re: Protest at Mass for John Paul |
13 Apr 2005 02:14:00 PM |
|
|
bam wrote:
Psa 14:1 The fool hath said in his heart: There is no God.
Perhaps, for once, the fool is right?
Bob Kolker
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "thomas p" |
|
| Title: Re: Protest at Mass for John Paul |
14 Apr 2005 06:16:49 PM |
|
|
On Tue, 12 Apr 2005 23:08:35 -0500, CB <country2000@hotmail.com>
wrote:
On Tue, 12 Apr 2005 21:37:28 GMT, MarkA <manthony@stopspam.net> wrote:
On Tue, 12 Apr 2005 11:22:24 -0700, ddurbin wrote:
CB wrote:
"Any swine who would molest or tolerate the molestation of children should
be
prosecuted to the full extent of the law, and then some."
Well, this is a first. I, a practicing Catholic, agree with CB. I was
embarrassed for the Church that Cardinal Law was chosen to celebrate the
Mass.
***** Durbin
It's not like the RCC has ever felt obliged to answer to anyone, except
God. And, since they are the ones in charge of defining what God wants,
they can pretty much write their own rule book, can't they?
LOL!!!
Sorry but God did not leave His church in the hands of apostates.
And we know it is god's church, because its leaders said so; and they
must be telling the truth, because they are the leaders of god's
church.
Thomas P.
"Life must be lived forwards but understood backwards"
(Kierkegaard)
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Marc Satterwhite" |
|
| Title: Re: Protest at Mass for John Paul |
13 Apr 2005 12:54:12 PM |
|
|
CB wrote:
On 12 Apr 2005 07:04:11 -0700, "J Young" <youngopinions@aol.com> wrote:
Protest at Mass for John Paul
Any swine who would disturb a solemn ceremony, such as a mass for Pope
John Paul II, should be prosecuted to the full extent of the law. Or is
that treatment reserved for anti-abortion protestors only?
Any swine who would molest or tolerate the molestation of children should be
prosecuted to the full extent of the law, and then some.
Plus I haven't seen that the Mass was "disrupted," only that people handed out
fliers and protested outside the church where the mass was held.
I'm perfectly willing to stand corrected if someone can point out reporting
to the contrary, but that's what I've seen so far.
Best, Marc
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Paul Duca" |
|
| Title: Re: Protest at Mass for John Paul |
13 Apr 2005 07:07:55 AM |
|
|
in article 1113314651.509292.212790@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com, J Young at
youngopinions@aol.com wrote on 4/12/05 10:04 AM:
Protest at Mass for John Paul
Any swine who would disturb a solemn ceremony, such as a mass for Pope
John Paul II, should be prosecuted to the full extent of the law.
Why do you think you'll eet rewarded for thinking some rite and
ritual is magically solemn?
Paul
.
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
