Prove of Evolution? Was: Prove of Keats



 Religions > Atheism > Prove of Evolution? Was: Prove of Keats

LINK TO THIS PAGE  


rating :  0   |  0


  Page 1 of 1

1

 
Topic: Religions > Atheism
User: "FreeThink"
Date: 30 Jan 2005 07:01:25 AM
Object: Prove of Evolution? Was: Prove of Keats
FreeThink Jan 29, 10:56 pm show options
Newsgroups: alt.meditation, alt.philosophy, alt.philosophy.debate,
alt.philosophy.kant, alt.philosophy.objectivism
From: "FreeThink" <zeno7772...@yahoo.com> - Find messages by this
author
Date: 29 Jan 2005 22:56:29 -0800
Local: Sat, Jan 29 2005 10:56 pm
Subject: Re: Proof of Keats
Reply | Reply to Author | Forward | Print | Individual Message | Show
original | Remove | Report Abuse
- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
ilya_shambat2...@yahoo.com wrote:

Judith Langlois, a psychologist, has found out, in a contr=ADolled
experiment, that there is a mathematical formula for beaut=ADy that is
seen to be beautiful by every observer asked, whatever the=ADir

culture.

The universe contains a sublime mathematical order. And in=AD the

formula

for beauty contains crystallization and reification of uni=ADversal

truth.

What the Renaissance masters believed - "beauty is manifes=ADtation of

the

divine" - and what Romantic poets intuited - "beauty is tr=ADuth" -

has

now been proven by science.
And now, the beliefs that motivated the greatest masterpie=ADces ever
created have been scientifically validated and elevated to=AD status

of

verifiable fact, thus bringing validity to the striving of=AD the

poetic

spirit for beauty in all of its forms - and, through the m=ADedium of
beauty, speaking the truth of the universe.=20
Ilya Shambat.

.

User: "FreeThink"

Title: Re: Prove of Evolution? Was: Prove of Keats 30 Jan 2005 07:02:24 AM
FreeThink wrote:

FreeThink Jan 29, 10:56 pm show options

Newsgroups: alt.meditation, alt.philosophy, alt.philosophy.debate,
alt.philosophy.kant, alt.philosophy.objectivism
From: "FreeThink" <zeno7772...@yahoo.com> - Find messages by this
author
Date: 29 Jan 2005 22:56:29 -0800
Local: Sat, Jan 29 2005 10:56 pm
Subject: Re: Proof of Keats
Reply | Reply to Author | Forward | Print | Individual Message | Show
original | Remove | Report Abuse




- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -

ilya_shambat2...@yahoo.com wrote:

Judith Langlois, a psychologist, has found out, in a contr=ADolled
experiment, that there is a mathematical formula for beaut=ADy that

is


seen to be beautiful by every observer asked, whatever the=ADir

culture.

The universe contains a sublime mathematical order. And in=AD the

formula

for beauty contains crystallization and reification of uni=ADversal

truth.


What the Renaissance masters believed - "beauty is manifes=ADtation

of


the

divine" - and what Romantic poets intuited - "beauty is tr=ADuth" -

has

now been proven by science.



And now, the beliefs that motivated the greatest masterpie=ADces

ever

created have been scientifically validated and elevated to=AD status

of

verifiable fact, thus bringing validity to the striving of=AD the

poetic

spirit for beauty in all of its forms - and, through the m=ADedium

of

beauty, speaking the truth of the universe.



Ilya Shambat.

I see some truth in her hypothesis. She tested infants atten=ADtion
spans
when presented with the faces of adults. She got longer look=ADs from
the
infants towards the faces that had previously been rated mor=ADe
beautiful.
She concludes that beauty is analogous to healthiness. I hav=ADe heard
something along these lines before about the symmetry of one=AD's face
being interpreted as more attractive. Symmetry possibly rela=ADted to
the
health of one's genes? Beauty also seems to have changed in =ADthe same
way as people's interpretation of health has changed, in my =ADopinion.
During the renaissance pale, overweight women were probably
=ADconsidered
healthier. They ate well and did not have to toil. Now, tan =ADwomen who
are skinny are attractive. They do not overeat and can lie a=ADbout in
the=20
sun.=20
This also seems to be a good evolutionary trait.=20
-E
.

User: "FreeThink"

Title: Re: Prove of Evolution? Was: Prove of Keats 30 Jan 2005 07:03:32 AM
I know, I know. I can't spell 'proof'.
.
User: "Sam"

Title: Re: Prove of Evolution? Was: Prove of Keats 30 Jan 2005 07:05:51 AM
FreeThink wrote:

I know, I know. I can't spell 'proof'.

or you cant form the sentence 'Evolution Proved? See for yourself!'
.
User: "FreeThink"

Title: Re: Prove of Evolution? Was: Prove of Keats 30 Jan 2005 07:09:06 AM
Sam wrote:

FreeThink wrote:

I know, I know. I can't spell 'proof'.


or you cant form the sentence 'Evolution Proved? See for yourself!'

Cute. Can I have your answer now?
.
User: "Sam"

Title: Re: Prove of Evolution? Was: Prove of Keats 30 Jan 2005 07:09:38 AM
FreeThink wrote:

Sam wrote:

FreeThink wrote:


I know, I know. I can't spell 'proof'.


or you cant form the sentence 'Evolution Proved? See for yourself!'


Cute. Can I have your answer now?

i'm sorry, what was the question?
.
User: "FreeThink"

Title: Re: Prove of Evolution? Was: Prove of Keats 30 Jan 2005 07:16:48 AM
Sam wrote:

FreeThink wrote:

Sam wrote:

FreeThink wrote:


I know, I know. I can't spell 'proof'.


or you cant form the sentence 'Evolution Proved? See for

yourself!'


Cute. Can I have your answer now?


i'm sorry, what was the question?

Oh, I'm sorry. I thought that since you were addressing my post you had
something relevant to say besides just being a smart@ss.
.
User: "Sam"

Title: Re: Prove of Evolution? Was: Prove of Keats 30 Jan 2005 07:17:32 AM
FreeThink wrote:

Sam wrote:

FreeThink wrote:


Sam wrote:


FreeThink wrote:



I know, I know. I can't spell 'proof'.


or you cant form the sentence 'Evolution Proved? See for


yourself!'

Cute. Can I have your answer now?


i'm sorry, what was the question?



Oh, I'm sorry. I thought that since you were addressing my post you had
something relevant to say besides just being a smart@ss.

no, nothing relevant
.







  Page 1 of 1

1

 


Related Articles
Kangaroos prove Noah's Ark really existed, evolution is a myth
Letter to the Editor: Science cannot prove evolution
Re: PROVE EVOLUTION WORKS AT HOME: DOWNLOAD AVIDA FREE
Do male nipples prove evolution?
Re: THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS GOD [ OK ... WELL I WANT YOU TO PROVE IT]
Re: THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS GOD [ OK ... WELL I WANT YOU TO PROVE IT]
Prove this wrong!!!!
you can't prove a negative
Re: See If You Can Prove Paranormal ! * * *
carol Witkowski - has 17 hours to prove that carol's husband is a abuser and that she is a *****.
OT: The Oldest Americans May Prove Even Older
OT:'We prove that Jews and Arabs can live together'
Do it to prove the religious right is wrong
$1,000,000 prize if you prove your the president of USA but you don't have delusions of grandeur
Re: LIBERALS PROVE THEMSELVES IDIOTS ==> DEMOCRACY STARTS AT HOME
 

NEWER

pg.3585     pg.2749     pg.2106     pg.1612     pg.1232     pg.940     pg.716     pg.544     pg.412     pg.311     pg.234     pg.175     pg.130     pg.96     pg.70     pg.50     pg.35     pg.24     pg.16     pg.10     pg.6     pg.3     pg.1

OLDER