PSA: Petition to U.S. Senators for Preserving Traditional One-Man/One-Woman Marriage in America



 Religions > Atheism > PSA: Petition to U.S. Senators for Preserving Traditional One-Man/One-Woman Marriage in America

LINK TO THIS PAGE  


rating :  0   |  0


  Page 2 of 2

1

 

2

 
Topic: Religions > Atheism
User: ""
Date: 10 Jun 2006 08:09:23 PM
Object: PSA: Petition to U.S. Senators for Preserving Traditional One-Man/One-Woman Marriage in America
The following link will direct you to the appropriate site. Below the link
is a copy of the petition.
https://www.frc.org/get.cfm?i=PT06C01&f=PG03I03&track=0
Dear Senator,
As a citizen concerned about the protection of marriage and the future
strength of families, I ask for your strong stand in defending marriage as
the union of one man and one woman. Right now activist judges seek to undo
the will expressed by an overwhelming majority of Americans committed to
traditional marriage. Whether by state courts in Massachusetts or federal
courts in Nebraska, marriage as an institution is under assault and poised
to be redefined. I ask that you would allow my voice, and the voice of
millions, to be heard on this crucial issue by sending to the states for
ratification an amendment to the U.S. Constitution reserving marriage as
only the union between one man and one woman. Our children deserve both a
mother and a father and public policy should promote this noble institution.
Please support the Marriage Protection Amendment when considered by the U.S.
Senate this June. Thank you and God bless.
Sincerely your constituent,
--
----------
J Young
youngopinions@aol.com
.

User: "Johnny"

Title: Re: PSA: Petition to U.S. Senators for Preserving Traditional One-Man/One-Woman Marriage in America 12 Jun 2006 08:07:34 AM
"Strife767" <strife767@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:fchp82dj2cnbcs2ojm80v7t1g0lbmv6uhr@4ax.com...

On Sun, 11 Jun 2006 21:08:50 -0400, "Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com>
wrote:


"Nick J." <NICK0094@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1150074093.480913.222280@m38g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...


Johnny wrote:

"Nick J." <NICK0094@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1150061805.359650.21070@i40g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...


Johnny wrote:

"Mark Sebree" <sebree@infionline.net> wrote in message
news:1149989748.704213.148150@y43g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...

youngopinions@aol.com wrote:

The following link will direct you to the appropriate site. Below
the
link
is a copy of the petition.

https://www.frc.org/get.cfm?i=PT06C01&f=PG03I03&track=0

Dear Senator,

As a citizen concerned about the protection of marriage and the
future
strength of families, I ask for your strong stand in defending
marriage
as
the union of one man and one woman. Right now activist judges
seek
to
undo
the will expressed by an overwhelming majority of Americans
committed
to
traditional marriage. Whether by state courts in Massachusetts or
federal
courts in Nebraska, marriage as an institution is under assault
and
poised
to be redefined. I ask that you would allow my voice, and the
voice
of
millions, to be heard on this crucial issue by sending to the
states
for
ratification an amendment to the U.S. Constitution reserving
marriage
as
only the union between one man and one woman. Our children
deserve
both a
mother and a father and public policy should promote this noble
institution.
Please support the Marriage Protection Amendment when considered
by
the
U.S.
Senate this June. Thank you and God bless.

Sincerely your constituent,


Sorry, but I shall never sign a petition that asks our
representatives
to violate people's equal rights and write bigotry into the
Constitution.

Marriage is NOT under assault. The only people that think that
are
bigots like you that do not want homosexuals to have the same
rights
as
you do. Nobody is trying to get rid of marriage or change it in
any
substantial way. The Marriage Protection Amendment is one of the
worst
named amendments or bills that I have ever heard of since it does
nothing to protect marriage, but rather seeks to DENY marriage to
a
segment of the population, and thus weaken marriage as an
institution.
If it was really for protecting marriage, it would be expanding
the
laws concerning marriage to allow marriage between homosexual
couples,
as is actually required by the 14th Amendment.


Yon don't understand the 14th Amendment very well.
You are lobbying for unequal protection.
You currently think that homosexuals are not protected equally to
married
persons, yet your lobby for only awarding same-sex persons the right
to
marry is doing nothing for any single person who is not currently
married.
The right to marry is moot to the 14th Amendment as it pertains to
unmarried
persons who do not want to marry.


If you feel so strongly about it, why don't you lobby the government
to
ban all marriage completely? It's your cause, *you* fight for it.


Why do you have a reading comprehension problem?
Or is it your vain accusation that I want marriage banned?
Sheesh.
You are an idiot.
Again, another person strays from the language of the Constitution in
an
effort to attain benefits unequal to other persons in the USA.


You said yourself that marriage is discrimination against single
people,


Did I? I was referring to the unequal protections that are awarded to
persons based on marital status.

so I assumed that you would want to ban all marriages,


And, you would be wrong there.

and thus
end discrimination against single people.


Not what I was saying. The 14th Amendment prohibits unequal protection and
unequal privilege.

Isn't that what you want?


Marriage itself seems to be no problem.


It looks like he wants removed all of the protections and rights that a
married couple gain as a result of their marriage.

What protections or privileges should any citizen have unequal to any other
citizen?
Can you answer that question in light of the 14th Amendment without
departing from it?
.

User: "Strife767"

Title: Re: PSA: Petition to U.S. Senators for Preserving Traditional One-Man/One-Woman Marriage in America 11 Jun 2006 04:24:15 PM
On Sun, 11 Jun 2006 17:18:59 -0400, "Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com>
wrote:


"Mark Sebree" <sebree@infionline.net> wrote in message
news:1149989748.704213.148150@y43g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...

youngopinions@aol.com wrote:

The following link will direct you to the appropriate site. Below the
link
is a copy of the petition.

https://www.frc.org/get.cfm?i=PT06C01&f=PG03I03&track=0

Dear Senator,

As a citizen concerned about the protection of marriage and the future
strength of families, I ask for your strong stand in defending marriage
as
the union of one man and one woman. Right now activist judges seek to
undo
the will expressed by an overwhelming majority of Americans committed to
traditional marriage. Whether by state courts in Massachusetts or federal
courts in Nebraska, marriage as an institution is under assault and
poised
to be redefined. I ask that you would allow my voice, and the voice of
millions, to be heard on this crucial issue by sending to the states for
ratification an amendment to the U.S. Constitution reserving marriage as
only the union between one man and one woman. Our children deserve both a
mother and a father and public policy should promote this noble
institution.
Please support the Marriage Protection Amendment when considered by the
U.S.
Senate this June. Thank you and God bless.

Sincerely your constituent,


Sorry, but I shall never sign a petition that asks our representatives
to violate people's equal rights and write bigotry into the
Constitution.

Marriage is NOT under assault. The only people that think that are
bigots like you that do not want homosexuals to have the same rights as
you do. Nobody is trying to get rid of marriage or change it in any
substantial way. The Marriage Protection Amendment is one of the worst
named amendments or bills that I have ever heard of since it does
nothing to protect marriage, but rather seeks to DENY marriage to a
segment of the population, and thus weaken marriage as an institution.
If it was really for protecting marriage, it would be expanding the
laws concerning marriage to allow marriage between homosexual couples,
as is actually required by the 14th Amendment.


Yon don't understand the 14th Amendment very well.
You are lobbying for unequal protection.
You currently think that homosexuals are not protected equally to married
persons, yet your lobby for only awarding same-sex persons the right to
marry

Huh? Who here is trying to get same-sex marriage to be the _only_ marriage?
.

User: "Bretts Ghost"

Title: Re: PSA: Petition to U.S. Senators for Preserving Traditional One-Man/One-Woman Marriage in America 10 Jun 2006 09:39:14 PM
wrote:

The following link will direct you to the appropriate site. Below the link
is a copy of the petition.

and how do you think it will hurt you if two ppl of the same sex marry?
.
User: "matureopinions"

Title: Re: PSA: Petition to U.S. Senators for Preserving Traditional One-Man/One-Woman Marriage in America 11 Jun 2006 07:09:00 PM
Bretts' Ghost wrote:

youngopinions@aol.com wrote:

The following link will direct you to the appropriate site. Below the link
is a copy of the petition.


and how do you think it will hurt you if two ppl of the same sex marry?

He can not answer that question for obvious reasons. None of the
policies
I have seen Young advocate actually benefit white, Catholic,
heterosexual,
American males. They just harm those who do not match the above
category. That's why I find his agenda so loathsome.
.
User: "Andrealphus"

Title: Re: PSA: Petition to U.S. Senators for Preserving Traditional One-Man/One-Woman Marriage in America 11 Jun 2006 07:10:26 PM
In News 1150070940.307494.189720@c74g2000cwc.googlegroups.com,,
matureopinions at prplbn@hotmail.com, typed this:

Bretts' Ghost wrote:

youngopinions@aol.com wrote:

The following link will direct you to the appropriate site. Below
the link is a copy of the petition.


and how do you think it will hurt you if two ppl of the same sex
marry?


He can not answer that question for obvious reasons. None of the
policies
I have seen Young advocate actually benefit white, Catholic,
heterosexual,
American males. They just harm those who do not match the above
category.

Which, in the putrid mind of jyoung, is an automatic benefit to white,
Catholic,
heterosexual, American males.
That's why I find his agenda so loathsome.
--
Question with boldness even the existence of god; because if there be
one, he must more approve the homage of reason than that of blindfolded
fear. - Thomas Jefferson
.
User: "matureopinions"

Title: Re: PSA: Petition to U.S. Senators for Preserving Traditional One-Man/One-Woman Marriage in America 11 Jun 2006 07:17:27 PM
Andrealphus wrote:

In News 1150070940.307494.189720@c74g2000cwc.googlegroups.com,,
matureopinions at prplbn@hotmail.com, typed this:

Bretts' Ghost wrote:

youngopinions@aol.com wrote:

The following link will direct you to the appropriate site. Below
the link is a copy of the petition.


and how do you think it will hurt you if two ppl of the same sex
marry?


He can not answer that question for obvious reasons. None of the
policies
I have seen Young advocate actually benefit white, Catholic,
heterosexual,
American males. They just harm those who do not match the above
category.


Which, in the putrid mind of jyoung, is an automatic benefit to white,
Catholic,
heterosexual, American males.

Indeed. The easiest way to ensure preferential treatment of WCHAMs is
to treat other people worse.

That's why I find his agenda so loathsome.

.
User: "Boy Toy"

Title: Re: PSA: Petition to U.S. Senators for Preserving Traditional One-Man/One-Woman Marriage in America 11 Jun 2006 07:53:11 PM
On 11 Jun 2006 17:17:27 -0700, "matureopinions" <prplbn@hotmail.com>
wrote in message
<1150071447.688648.257070@f6g2000cwb.googlegroups.com>


Andrealphus wrote:

In News 1150070940.307494.189720@c74g2000cwc.googlegroups.com,,
matureopinions at prplbn@hotmail.com, typed this:

Bretts' Ghost wrote:

youngopinions@aol.com wrote:

The following link will direct you to the appropriate site. Below
the link is a copy of the petition.


and how do you think it will hurt you if two ppl of the same sex
marry?


He can not answer that question for obvious reasons. None of the
policies
I have seen Young advocate actually benefit white, Catholic,
heterosexual,
American males. They just harm those who do not match the above
category.


Which, in the putrid mind of jyoung, is an automatic benefit to white,
Catholic,
heterosexual, American males.


Indeed. The easiest way to ensure preferential treatment of WCHAMs is
to treat other people worse.

That's why I find his agenda so loathsome.

It is the strategy of those who lack the ability to create. All they
can do is destroy. Such pathetic existences they must lead!
.





User: "Attila2"

Title: Re: PSA: Petition to U.S. Senators for Preserving Traditional One-Man/One-Woman Marriage in America 11 Jun 2006 05:37:50 AM
On Sat, 10 Jun 2006 21:09:23 -0400, <youngopinions@aol.com> in
alt.abortion with message-id
<7ZmdnU0wi4a48xbZnZ2dnUVZ_v-dnZ2d@giganews.com> wrote:
More propagandizing spam from one of the usual sources.
.

User: "Strife767"

Title: Re: PSA: Petition to U.S. Senators for Preserving Traditional One-Man/One-Woman Marriage in America 10 Jun 2006 09:37:19 PM
On Sat, 10 Jun 2006 21:09:23 -0400, <youngopinions@aol.com> wrote:

The following link will direct you to the appropriate site. Below the link
is a copy of the petition.

https://www.frc.org/get.cfm?i=PT06C01&f=PG03I03&track=0

ROFL, no one cares about online petitions in the first place. What would
make anyone think something so trivial would have _any_ real effect to their
end?
.

User: "Mark K. Bilbo"

Title: Re: PSA: Petition to U.S. Senators for Preserving Traditional One-Man/One-Woman Marriage in America 10 Jun 2006 08:17:27 PM
Previously, on alt.atheism, youngopinions in episode
<7ZmdnU0wi4a48xbZnZ2dnUVZ_v-dnZ2d@giganews.com>...

The following link will direct you to the appropriate site. Below the link
is a copy of the petition.

It's not going to pass dimwit. Attitudes are changing and the number of
you bigots is declining.
Now, off to the dust bin of history with you...
--
Mark K. Bilbo
--------------------------------------------------
"As hip as it is for outsiders to blame New Orleans
for everything bad that happened during and after
Hurricane Katrina, the truth is that the people
who lived here were much more prepared for a big
storm than the federal government that promised
us flood protection." [Jarvis DeBerry]
http://makeashorterlink.com/?V180525DC
"Everything New Orleans"
http://www.nola.com
.


  Page 2 of 2

1

 

2

 


Related Articles
Petition to U.S. Senators for Preserving Traditional One-Man/One-Woman Marriage in America
Preserving cultures
OT: the government is “protecting the American people while honoring the Constitution and preserving the liberties we hold dear
America's "Noble" Cause: Preserving its Right to Murder, Exploit, Torture, and Impoverish with Impunity
OT: Preserving radicalism and dissent
OT- No one you ever heard of dead at the age of whatever
OT: 'Everything and More': Room for One More
OT: One-Doorbell-One-Vote Tactic Re-emerges in Bush-Kerry Race
OT: humourous pics first one is german shepard licking a tiny kitten
Saw Air Force One today...
Hitler and Stalin Would Smile as They Recognize One of Their Own
This is not a vote about ideas. It comes down to the verdict of a divided nation on one man
Britain, not the US, is the odd one out
Here's a weird one
OT: I'm proud to vote Lib Dem, but for one reason only
 

NEWER

pg.3801     pg.2109     pg.1169     pg.647     pg.357     pg.196     pg.107     pg.58     pg.31     pg.16     pg.8     pg.4     pg.2

OLDER