PSA: June 4th is Marriage Protection Sunday



 Religions > Atheism > PSA: June 4th is Marriage Protection Sunday

LINK TO THIS PAGE  


rating :  0   |  0


  Page 3 of 7

1

 

2

 

3

 

4

 

5

 

6

 

7

 
Topic: Religions > Atheism
User: ""
Date: 24 May 2006 11:17:16 PM
Object: PSA: June 4th is Marriage Protection Sunday
http://www.bpnews.net/bpnews.asp?ID=23282
Marriage Protection Sunday: Churches encouraged to address 'gay marriage'
June 4
WASHINGTON (BP)--The Ethics & Religious Liberty Commission is asking
Southern Baptist churches to consider observing Marriage Protection Sunday
June 4, the eve of Senate debate on a constitutional amendment regarding the
issue.
Senators are scheduled to begin consideration of the Marriage Protection
Amendment June 5, with a floor vote expected June 6 or 7. The MPA, S.J. Res.
1, defines marriage as only between a man and a woman. The proposal is
designed to protect the institution against continuing legal efforts to
legalize "homosexual marriage."
The ERLC, the Southern Baptist Convention's public policy entity, is
requesting pastors to address "same-sex marriage" June 4 and to encourage
church members to ask their senators to support the amendment.
"Supporters of traditional marriage need to bombard their senators' offices
with e-mails and phone calls," ERLC President Richard Land told Baptist
Press, "and preachers across America need to let the pulpit ring forth in
clear and no uncertain terms on Marriage Protection Sunday, June 4, and help
create a groundswell of support for this amendment. I can assure you the
opponents of traditional marriage are doing their best to let their voices
be heard in the corridors of the Senate. It is up to us to let our voices be
heard loudly as well."
Massachusetts is the only state to have legalized "same-sex marriage," but
state supreme courts in New Jersey, New York and Washington could legitimize
such unions before the end of the year.
--
----------
J Young
youngopinions@aol.com
.

User: ""

Title: Re: PSA: June 4th is Marriage Protection Sunday 27 May 2006 02:02:29 PM
On Sat, 27 May 2006 04:05:58 GMT, <bibon@râlant.org> wrote:

On Fri, 26 May 2006 20:12:02 -0500, "Mark K. Bilbo"
<alt-atheism@org.webmaster> wrote:

Previously, on alt.atheism, Bitchin' Bonney in episode
<0mse7299dkmqs637qg5gpgnl6trg7brj67@4ax.com>...


On Fri, 26 May 2006 08:08:46 -0700,

wrote:

On Fri, 26 May 2006 01:04:35 GMT, B <bibon@râlant.org> wrote:

On Thu, 25 May 2006 18:50:46 -0500, "Mark K. Bilbo"
<alt-atheism@org.webmaster> wrote:

And Massachusetts has one of the lowest divorce rates (if not the
lowest) in the country.


And because of it's excessive per capita homosexual count it is said to
have an extraordinarily high AIDS death rate.


"said to have"? In other words you're making it up as you go along.

Sheesh, how pathetic.


Silly boy.


You are confused boy, you're trying to compare fruit with disease. My
comment was about


Per capita. And he showed you per capita numbers. Now you're having a
tantrum because you were shown to be full of *****.


No, he "showed" number of AIDS cases. I referred to something totally
different. Pay attention or keep your mouth shut.

Chuckle. Here's exactly what I posted:
Silly boy.
http://www.avert.org/usastats.htm
The Massachusetts rate is 8.8/100,000
Mississippi's is 16.5.
Texas is 14.7., Georgia 18.6.
The national average is 14.9
Do you want to take another try and make up some BS that is almost
believable?
<end repost>
Caught lying again, aye?
First response lie. The lie about lying, then call people names, and
lie again.
________________
I am human; nothing in humanity is alien to me.
Terence
.
User: "Bitchin Bonney"

Title: Re: PSA: June 4th is Marriage Protection Sunday 27 May 2006 07:46:02 PM
On Sat, 27 May 2006 12:02:29 -0700,
wrote:

On Sat, 27 May 2006 04:05:58 GMT, <bibon@râlant.org> wrote:

On Fri, 26 May 2006 20:12:02 -0500, "Mark K. Bilbo"
<alt-atheism@org.webmaster> wrote:

Previously, on alt.atheism, Bitchin' Bonney in episode
<0mse7299dkmqs637qg5gpgnl6trg7brj67@4ax.com>...


On Fri, 26 May 2006 08:08:46 -0700,

wrote:

On Fri, 26 May 2006 01:04:35 GMT, B <bibon@râlant.org> wrote:

On Thu, 25 May 2006 18:50:46 -0500, "Mark K. Bilbo"
<alt-atheism@org.webmaster> wrote:

And Massachusetts has one of the lowest divorce rates (if not the
lowest) in the country.


And because of it's excessive per capita homosexual count it is said to
have an extraordinarily high AIDS death rate.


"said to have"? In other words you're making it up as you go along.

Sheesh, how pathetic.


Silly boy.


You are confused boy, you're trying to compare fruit with disease. My
comment was about


Per capita. And he showed you per capita numbers. Now you're having a
tantrum because you were shown to be full of *****.


No, he "showed" number of AIDS cases. I referred to something totally
different. Pay attention or keep your mouth shut.



Chuckle. Here's exactly what I posted:


Silly boy.

http://www.avert.org/usastats.htm

The Massachusetts rate is 8.8/100,000

Mississippi's is 16.5.

Texas is 14.7., Georgia 18.6.

The national average is 14.9

Do you want to take another try and make up some BS that is almost
believable?

Why certainly, I'm pleased to tell you how fucked up you are. You're
totally fucked up. What you posted has nothing, nada, zilch, ZERO to
do with the per capita AIDS cases among homosexuals. Now do us all a
favor and *****, nitwit.
.
User: ""

Title: Re: PSA: June 4th is Marriage Protection Sunday 27 May 2006 08:29:29 PM
On Sun, 28 May 2006 00:46:02 GMT, Bitchin' Bonney <bibon@râlant.org>
wrote:

On Sat, 27 May 2006 12:02:29 -0700,

wrote:

On Sat, 27 May 2006 04:05:58 GMT, <bibon@râlant.org> wrote:

On Fri, 26 May 2006 20:12:02 -0500, "Mark K. Bilbo"
<alt-atheism@org.webmaster> wrote:

Previously, on alt.atheism, Bitchin' Bonney in episode
<0mse7299dkmqs637qg5gpgnl6trg7brj67@4ax.com>...


On Fri, 26 May 2006 08:08:46 -0700,

wrote:

On Fri, 26 May 2006 01:04:35 GMT, B <bibon@râlant.org> wrote:

On Thu, 25 May 2006 18:50:46 -0500, "Mark K. Bilbo"
<alt-atheism@org.webmaster> wrote:

And Massachusetts has one of the lowest divorce rates (if not the
lowest) in the country.


And because of it's excessive per capita homosexual count it is said to
have an extraordinarily high AIDS death rate.


"said to have"? In other words you're making it up as you go along.

Sheesh, how pathetic.


Silly boy.


You are confused boy, you're trying to compare fruit with disease. My
comment was about


Per capita. And he showed you per capita numbers. Now you're having a
tantrum because you were shown to be full of *****.


No, he "showed" number of AIDS cases. I referred to something totally
different. Pay attention or keep your mouth shut.



Chuckle. Here's exactly what I posted:


Silly boy.

http://www.avert.org/usastats.htm

The Massachusetts rate is 8.8/100,000

Mississippi's is 16.5.

Texas is 14.7., Georgia 18.6.

The national average is 14.9

Do you want to take another try and make up some BS that is almost
believable?


Why certainly, I'm pleased to tell you how fucked up you are. You're
totally fucked up. What you posted has nothing, nada, zilch, ZERO to
do with the per capita AIDS cases among homosexuals.

No? Let's remember you were talking specifically about Mass.
Remember?
Here let me help:
On Fri, 26 May 2006 01:04:35 GMT, B <bibon@râlant.org> wrote:

On Thu, 25 May 2006 18:50:46 -0500, "Mark K. Bilbo"
<alt-atheism@org.webmaster> wrote:

And Massachusetts has one of the lowest divorce rates (if not the lowest)
in the country.


And because of it's excessive per capita homosexual count it is said
to have an extraordinarily high AIDS death rate.

SO a high aids rate for Mass. is an essential part of your argument.
So we quoted the per capita aids rate to you (Which is much lower than
the national average) and posted a few other states for your
comparison.

Now do us all a
favor and *****, nitwit.

Silly boy.
http://www.avert.org/usastats.htm
The Massachusetts rate is 8.8/100,000
Mississippi's is 16.5.
Texas is 14.7., Georgia 18.6.
The national average is 14.9
Do you want to take another try and make up some BS that is almost
believable?
[You know anyone with half a brain or an capable of an ounce of shame
would merely slink away instead of reopening this episode on every
post to show how totally wrong and dishonest you are.]
________________
I am human; nothing in humanity is alien to me.
Terence
.
User: "Bitchin Bonney"

Title: Re: PSA: June 4th is Marriage Protection Sunday 27 May 2006 10:12:46 PM
On Sat, 27 May 2006 18:29:29 -0700,
wrote:

On Sun, 28 May 2006 00:46:02 GMT, Bitchin' Bonney <bibon@râlant.org>
wrote:

On Sat, 27 May 2006 12:02:29 -0700,

wrote:

On Sat, 27 May 2006 04:05:58 GMT, <bibon@râlant.org> wrote:

On Fri, 26 May 2006 20:12:02 -0500, "Mark K. Bilbo"
<alt-atheism@org.webmaster> wrote:

Previously, on alt.atheism, Bitchin' Bonney in episode
<0mse7299dkmqs637qg5gpgnl6trg7brj67@4ax.com>...


On Fri, 26 May 2006 08:08:46 -0700,

wrote:

On Fri, 26 May 2006 01:04:35 GMT, B <bibon@râlant.org> wrote:

On Thu, 25 May 2006 18:50:46 -0500, "Mark K. Bilbo"
<alt-atheism@org.webmaster> wrote:

And Massachusetts has one of the lowest divorce rates (if not the
lowest) in the country.


And because of it's excessive per capita homosexual count it is said to
have an extraordinarily high AIDS death rate.


"said to have"? In other words you're making it up as you go along.

Sheesh, how pathetic.


Silly boy.


You are confused boy, you're trying to compare fruit with disease. My
comment was about


Per capita. And he showed you per capita numbers. Now you're having a
tantrum because you were shown to be full of *****.


No, he "showed" number of AIDS cases. I referred to something totally
different. Pay attention or keep your mouth shut.



Chuckle. Here's exactly what I posted:


Silly boy.

http://www.avert.org/usastats.htm

The Massachusetts rate is 8.8/100,000

Mississippi's is 16.5.

Texas is 14.7., Georgia 18.6.

The national average is 14.9

Do you want to take another try and make up some BS that is almost
believable?


Why certainly, I'm pleased to tell you how fucked up you are. You're
totally fucked up. What you posted has nothing, nada, zilch, ZERO to
do with the per capita AIDS cases among homosexuals.


No? Let's remember you were talking specifically about Mass.
Remember?

Here let me help:
On Fri, 26 May 2006 01:04:35 GMT, B <bibon@râlant.org> wrote:

On Thu, 25 May 2006 18:50:46 -0500, "Mark K. Bilbo"
<alt-atheism@org.webmaster> wrote:

And Massachusetts has one of the lowest divorce rates (if not the lowest)
in the country.


And because of it's excessive per capita homosexual count it is said
to have an extraordinarily high AIDS death rate.


SO a high aids rate for Mass. is an essential part of your argument.

So we quoted the per capita aids rate to you (Which is much lower than
the national average) and posted a few other states for your
comparison.


Now do us all a
favor and *****, nitwit.


Silly boy.

http://www.avert.org/usastats.htm

The Massachusetts rate is 8.8/100,000

Mississippi's is 16.5.

Texas is 14.7., Georgia 18.6.

The national average is 14.9

Do you want to take another try and make up some BS that is almost
believable?


[You know anyone with half a brain or an capable of an ounce of shame
would merely slink away instead of reopening this episode on every
post to show how totally wrong and dishonest you are.]

Look, numb nuts the topic was "per capita" AIDS cases. You vomit up a
bunch of numbers and claim that they represent per capita data on AIDS
cases. Now, *****-for-brains, look at the header from the chart that
you got the info from:
"Estimated numbers of persons living with HIV (not AIDS) or with AIDS
at the end of 2004, and AIDS case rates, by USA area of residence"
NO WHERE does it even hint at the data being based on AIDS cases per
capita. It only applies to cases per 100,000 population.
YOU CAN ***** NOW, ***** SUCKER. Isn't time for your AIDS cocktail
anyway...
.
User: "Kilmir"

Title: Re: PSA: June 4th is Marriage Protection Sunday 28 May 2006 09:22:33 AM

NO WHERE does it even hint at the data being based on AIDS cases per
capita. It only applies to cases per 100,000 population.

.... Wait you really don't understand "per capita" do you? Per capita
means on average.
Here is an easy way to get the figures you want: devide the numbers by
100.000/100 (100 to get percentages)
For Mass. it's 8,8/1.000 = 0,0088%
So 0,0088% of the population of Mass. has aids.
or 0,000088 for each 1 inhabitant.
See? easy!
But for normal people who hate working with 4 or 6 decimals behind the
comma some statistics use a multiplier to get reasonable numbers for
easy comparison.
.
User: ""

Title: Re: PSA: June 4th is Marriage Protection Sunday 28 May 2006 09:59:20 AM
On 28 May 2006 07:22:33 -0700, "Kilmir" <Kilmir@gmail.com> wrote:


But for normal people who hate working with 4 or 6 decimals behind the
comma some statistics use a multiplier to get reasonable numbers for
easy comparison.

Bingo!
________________
I am human; nothing in humanity is alien to me.
Terence
.

User: ""

Title: Re: PSA: June 4th is Marriage Protection Sunday 28 May 2006 09:59:02 AM
On 28 May 2006 07:22:33 -0700, "Kilmir" <Kilmir@gmail.com> wrote:

NO WHERE does it even hint at the data being based on AIDS cases per
capita. It only applies to cases per 100,000 population.


... Wait you really don't understand "per capita" do you? Per capita
means on average.

Here is an easy way to get the figures you want: devide the numbers by
100.000/100 (100 to get percentages)
For Mass. it's 8,8/1.000 = 0,0088%
So 0,0088% of the population of Mass. has aids.
or 0,000088 for each 1 inhabitant.
See? easy!

Latin for “by heads.” A measurement that is presented in terms of
units per person, as opposed to a total or aggregate figure.
For very small numbers per capita figures are done in aggregate of
larger population, per 10,000; 100,000 or million.
This allows for more valid comparisons between populations of
different sizes.
indicators.top10by2010.org/glossary.cfm
________________
I am human; nothing in humanity is alien to me.
Terence
.
User: "Bitchin Bonney"

Title: Re: PSA: June 4th is Marriage Protection Sunday 28 May 2006 12:28:25 PM
On Sun, 28 May 2006 07:59:02 -0700,
wrote:

This allows for more valid comparisons between populations of
different sizes.

Oh! Look, someone told him what per capita really means and he had to
do a whole new post to try to cover his dumb *****. <SNIGGER> you're
still a stupid *****-wit.
.
User: ""

Title: Re: PSA: June 4th is Marriage Protection Sunday 28 May 2006 02:22:11 PM
On Sun, 28 May 2006 17:28:25 GMT, Bitchin' Bonney <bibon@râlant.org>
wrote:

On Sun, 28 May 2006 07:59:02 -0700,

wrote:


This allows for more valid comparisons between populations of
different sizes.


Oh! Look, someone told him what per capita really means and he had to
do a whole new post to try to cover his dumb *****. <SNIGGER> you're
still a stupid *****-wit.

You're a real hoot. I posted the per capita numbers and you've been
claiming they're not per capita. And you dare to call someone else
stupid?
Sheesh.
Original post:
Silly boy.
http://www.avert.org/usastats.htm
The Massachusetts rate is 8.8/100,000
Mississippi's is 16.5.
Texas is 14.7., Georgia 18.6.
The national average is 14.9
Do you want to take another try and make up some BS that is almost
believable?
________________
I am human; nothing in humanity is alien to me.
Terence
.
User: "Boy Toy"

Title: Re: PSA: June 4th is Marriage Protection Sunday 28 May 2006 06:05:48 PM
On Sun, 28 May 2006 12:22:11 -0700,
wrote in
message <00uj72purj8pd09upi3o3ur26kf2a5jmua@4ax.com>

On Sun, 28 May 2006 17:28:25 GMT, Bitchin' Bonney <bibon@râlant.org>
wrote:

On Sun, 28 May 2006 07:59:02 -0700,

wrote:


This allows for more valid comparisons between populations of
different sizes.


Oh! Look, someone told him what per capita really means and he had to
do a whole new post to try to cover his dumb *****. <SNIGGER> you're
still a stupid *****-wit.


I would say people who don't automatically recognize that a quantity
per 100,000 is equivalent (upon simple division) to a quantity per
unit are the "stupid *****-wits." People don't need to explain such
computational trivialities, except perhaps to utter morons.
The real problem is that BB assumes everybody is as dense as he is.
Perhaps that's because he surrounds himself with NeoCon fundies.

You're a real hoot. I posted the per capita numbers and you've been
claiming they're not per capita. And you dare to call someone else
stupid?

Sheesh.

Original post:

Silly boy.

http://www.avert.org/usastats.htm

The Massachusetts rate is 8.8/100,000

Mississippi's is 16.5.

Texas is 14.7., Georgia 18.6.

The national average is 14.9

Do you want to take another try and make up some BS that is almost
believable?


________________
I am human; nothing in humanity is alien to me.
Terence

.





User: ""

Title: Re: PSA: June 4th is Marriage Protection Sunday 28 May 2006 09:55:28 AM
On Sun, 28 May 2006 03:12:46 GMT, Bitchin' Bonney <bibon@râlant.org>
wrote:

Look, numb nuts the topic was "per capita" AIDS cases. You vomit up a
bunch of numbers and claim that they represent per capita data on AIDS
cases. Now, *****-for-brains, look at the header from the chart that
you got the info from:

"Estimated numbers of persons living with HIV (not AIDS) or with AIDS
at the end of 2004, and AIDS case rates, by USA area of residence"

NO WHERE does it even hint at the data being based on AIDS cases per
capita. It only applies to cases per 100,000 population.

Gee it only applies to cases per 100,000 population and it doesn't
have anything to do with per capita rates?
Ummmmmm.
Never mind.
________________
I am human; nothing in humanity is alien to me.
Terence
.
User: "Boy Toy"

Title: Re: PSA: June 4th is Marriage Protection Sunday 28 May 2006 10:59:29 AM
On Sun, 28 May 2006 07:55:28 -0700,
wrote in
message <jdej72d1k6chhfiflskpd0vstitkjhbma6@4ax.com>

On Sun, 28 May 2006 03:12:46 GMT, Bitchin' Bonney <bibon@râlant.org>
wrote:

Look, numb nuts the topic was "per capita" AIDS cases. You vomit up a
bunch of numbers and claim that they represent per capita data on AIDS
cases. Now, *****-for-brains, look at the header from the chart that
you got the info from:

"Estimated numbers of persons living with HIV (not AIDS) or with AIDS
at the end of 2004, and AIDS case rates, by USA area of residence"

NO WHERE does it even hint at the data being based on AIDS cases per
capita. It only applies to cases per 100,000 population.


THERE IT IS! Proof positive that BB does not understand the meaning
of per capita, how to use it, OR fractions. CASE CLOSED!


Gee it only applies to cases per 100,000 population and it doesn't
have anything to do with per capita rates?

Ummmmmm.

Never mind.

________________
I am human; nothing in humanity is alien to me.
Terence

.

User: "Bitchin Bonney"

Title: Re: PSA: June 4th is Marriage Protection Sunday 28 May 2006 12:26:17 PM
On Sun, 28 May 2006 07:55:28 -0700,
wrote:

Gee it only applies to cases per 100,000 population and it doesn't
have anything to do with per capita rates?

Ummmmmm.

Never mind.

Thanks for saving me the time of pointing out you stupidity.
.
User: ""

Title: Re: PSA: June 4th is Marriage Protection Sunday 28 May 2006 02:39:39 PM
On Sun, 28 May 2006 17:26:17 GMT, Bitchin' Bonney <bibon@râlant.org>
wrote:

On Sun, 28 May 2006 07:55:28 -0700,

wrote:

Gee it only applies to cases per 100,000 population and it doesn't
have anything to do with per capita rates?

Ummmmmm.

Never mind.


Thanks for saving me the time of pointing out you stupidity.

I gotta laugh at someone who spends all his time posting to
alt.politics.homosexuality to convince himself he's not gay.
________________
I am human; nothing in humanity is alien to me.
Terence
.
User: "Bitchin Bonney"

Title: Re: PSA: June 4th is Marriage Protection Sunday 29 May 2006 01:13:12 AM
On Sun, 28 May 2006 12:39:39 -0700,
wrote:

I gotta laugh at someone who spends all his time posting to
alt.politics.homosexuality to convince himself he's not gay.

Then you should stop posting and then you can stop laughing.
See how that works, ***** sucker?
.
User: ""

Title: Re: PSA: June 4th is Marriage Protection Sunday 29 May 2006 08:28:44 AM
On Mon, 29 May 2006 06:13:12 GMT, Bitchin' Bonney <bibon@râlant.org>
wrote:

On Sun, 28 May 2006 12:39:39 -0700,

wrote:

I gotta laugh at someone who spends all his time posting to
alt.politics.homosexuality to convince himself he's not gay.



Then you should stop posting and then you can stop laughing.
See how that works, ***** sucker?

Admit it you get hard just writing about it don't you?
________________
I am human; nothing in humanity is alien to me.
Terence
.




User: "Mark K. Bilbo"

Title: Re: PSA: June 4th is Marriage Protection Sunday 28 May 2006 10:55:55 AM
Previously, on alt.atheism, retrogrouch in episode
<jdej72d1k6chhfiflskpd0vstitkjhbma6@4ax.com>...

On Sun, 28 May 2006 03:12:46 GMT, Bitchin' Bonney <bibon@râlant.org>
wrote:

Look, numb nuts the topic was "per capita" AIDS cases. You vomit up a
bunch of numbers and claim that they represent per capita data on AIDS
cases. Now, *****-for-brains, look at the header from the chart that you
got the info from:

"Estimated numbers of persons living with HIV (not AIDS) or with AIDS at
the end of 2004, and AIDS case rates, by USA area of residence"

NO WHERE does it even hint at the data being based on AIDS cases per
capita. It only applies to cases per 100,000 population.



Gee it only applies to cases per 100,000 population and it doesn't have
anything to do with per capita rates?

Ummmmmm.

Never mind.

That is one of the funniest things I've seen a troll come up with this
week...
--
Mark K. Bilbo
--------------------------------------------------
"As hip as it is for outsiders to blame New Orleans
for everything bad that happened during and after
Hurricane Katrina, the truth is that the people
who lived here were much more prepared for a big
storm than the federal government that promised
us flood protection." [Jarvis DeBerry]
http://makeashorterlink.com/?V180525DC
"Everything New Orleans"
http://www.nola.com
.
User: "Clave"

Title: Re: PSA: June 4th is Marriage Protection Sunday 28 May 2006 09:01:46 PM
"Mark K. Bilbo" <alt-atheism@org.webmaster> wrote in message
news:V-CdnYcNU7KWVeTZRVn-og@megapath.net...

Previously, on alt.atheism, retrogrouch in episode
<jdej72d1k6chhfiflskpd0vstitkjhbma6@4ax.com>...

On Sun, 28 May 2006 03:12:46 GMT, Bitchin' Bonney <bibon@râlant.org>
wrote:

Look, numb nuts the topic was "per capita" AIDS cases. You vomit up a
bunch of numbers and claim that they represent per capita data on AIDS
cases. Now, *****-for-brains, look at the header from the chart that you
got the info from:

"Estimated numbers of persons living with HIV (not AIDS) or with AIDS at
the end of 2004, and AIDS case rates, by USA area of residence"

NO WHERE does it even hint at the data being based on AIDS cases per
capita. It only applies to cases per 100,000 population.



Gee it only applies to cases per 100,000 population and it doesn't have
anything to do with per capita rates?

Ummmmmm.

Never mind.


That is one of the funniest things I've seen a troll come up with this
week...

Just wow.
Jim
.

User: ""

Title: Re: PSA: June 4th is Marriage Protection Sunday 28 May 2006 02:27:05 PM
On Sun, 28 May 2006 10:55:55 -0500, "Mark K. Bilbo"
<alt-atheism@org.webmaster> wrote:

Previously, on alt.atheism, retrogrouch in episode
<jdej72d1k6chhfiflskpd0vstitkjhbma6@4ax.com>...

On Sun, 28 May 2006 03:12:46 GMT, Bitchin' Bonney <bibon@râlant.org>
wrote:

Look, numb nuts the topic was "per capita" AIDS cases. You vomit up a
bunch of numbers and claim that they represent per capita data on AIDS
cases. Now, *****-for-brains, look at the header from the chart that you
got the info from:

"Estimated numbers of persons living with HIV (not AIDS) or with AIDS at
the end of 2004, and AIDS case rates, by USA area of residence"

NO WHERE does it even hint at the data being based on AIDS cases per
capita. It only applies to cases per 100,000 population.



Gee it only applies to cases per 100,000 population and it doesn't have
anything to do with per capita rates?

Ummmmmm.

Never mind.


That is one of the funniest things I've seen a troll come up with this
week...

I usually twit filter such ignorant hateful people on my first or
second message. But occasionally the sheer depths of the combination
of stupidity, arrogance and hate merit a long look. It's like passing
a wreck on the freeway. Some days you just feel a need to slow down
and look.
Such ignorance should be painful, then they'd seek to avoid it rather
than take such pride in it.
________________
I am human; nothing in humanity is alien to me.
Terence
.
User: "Bitchin Bonney"

Title: Re: PSA: June 4th is Marriage Protection Sunday 29 May 2006 01:11:08 AM
On Sun, 28 May 2006 12:27:05 -0700,
wrote:

I usually twit filter such ignorant hateful people on my first or
second message.

But I've verbally stomped such a huge mud hole in your twinkie little
***** that you will do anything to try to recover. Give up while your
still only FAR behind.

But occasionally the sheer depths of the combination
of stupidity, arrogance and hate merit a long look. It's like passing
a wreck on the freeway. Some days you just feel a need to slow down
and look.

Yes, I find communicating with you be much like feeding maggots to a
lizard...How do you like the taste, Gecko-Boy?
.
User: ""

Title: Re: PSA: June 4th is Marriage Protection Sunday 29 May 2006 08:28:00 AM
On Mon, 29 May 2006 06:11:08 GMT, Bitchin' Bonney <bibon@râlant.org>
wrote:

On Sun, 28 May 2006 12:27:05 -0700,

wrote:

I usually twit filter such ignorant hateful people on my first or
second message.


But I've verbally stomped such a huge mud hole in your twinkie little
***** that you will do anything to try to recover. Give up while your
still only FAR behind.

But occasionally the sheer depths of the combination
of stupidity, arrogance and hate merit a long look. It's like passing
a wreck on the freeway. Some days you just feel a need to slow down
and look.


Yes, I find communicating with you be much like feeding maggots to a
lizard...How do you like the taste, Gecko-Boy?

You're oddly incapable of not responding to any post, and yet totally
incapable of an actual reply to the point raised.
It's pretty damn funny. In a very sad way.
What was your point about Mass. Bonnie? Where are the stats that show
your point? Why do the stats posted by me not address your point?
Oh and let's add why isn't the aids deaths per 100,000 a per capita
figure?
BWAHAHAHAHAHA!
________________
I am human; nothing in humanity is alien to me.
Terence
.
User: "Andrealphus"

Title: Re: PSA: June 4th is Marriage Protection Sunday 29 May 2006 08:30:52 AM
In News ajtl72l5kga3p5fn5o8iemc1lo66mcu0na@4ax.com,,

at
, typed this:

On Mon, 29 May 2006 06:11:08 GMT, Bitchin' Bonney <bibon@râlant.org>
wrote:

On Sun, 28 May 2006 12:27:05 -0700,

wrote:

I usually twit filter such ignorant hateful people on my first or
second message.


But I've verbally stomped such a huge mud hole in your twinkie little
***** that you will do anything to try to recover. Give up while your
still only FAR behind.

But occasionally the sheer depths of the combination
of stupidity, arrogance and hate merit a long look. It's like
passing a wreck on the freeway. Some days you just feel a need to
slow down and look.


Yes, I find communicating with you be much like feeding maggots to a
lizard...How do you like the taste, Gecko-Boy?



You're oddly incapable of not responding to any post, and yet totally
incapable of an actual reply to the point raised.

It's pretty damn funny. In a very sad way.

What was your point about Mass. Bonnie? Where are the stats that show
your point? Why do the stats posted by me not address your point?

Oh and let's add why isn't the aids deaths per 100,000 a per capita
figure?


BWAHAHAHAHAHA!

Bitchin' Bonnie would sell his own grandmother into slavery if it meant
insutling one gay or lesbian. Lies and evasion are nothing new to him.
--
Question with boldness even the existence of god; because if there be
one, he must more approve the homage of reason than that of blindfolded
fear. - Thomas Jefferson
.

User: "Bitchin Bonney"

Title: Re: PSA: June 4th is Marriage Protection Sunday 29 May 2006 07:29:40 PM
On Mon, 29 May 2006 06:28:00 -0700,
wrote:

Oh and let's add why isn't the aids deaths per 100,000 a per capita
figure?

That the question you needs to answer.You obviously don't know the
difference in ratio and per capita. When you have learned that get
back to the topic won't you...
.
User: "Ray Fischer"

Title: Re: PSA: June 4th is Marriage Protection Sunday 29 May 2006 11:45:58 PM
Bitchin' Bonney <bibon@râlant.org> wrote:

retrogrouch@comcast.net wrote:

Oh and let's add why isn't the aids deaths per 100,000 a per capita
figure?


That the question you needs to answer.You obviously don't know the
difference in ratio and per capita.

Perhaps you should explain it to us.
If you can.
--
Ray Fischer
rfischer@sonic.net
.
User: "Bitchin Bonney"

Title: Re: PSA: June 4th is Marriage Protection Sunday 30 May 2006 11:24:54 AM
On 30 May 2006 04:45:58 GMT,
(Ray Fischer) wrote:

Bitchin' Bonney <bibon@râlant.org> wrote:

retrogrouch@comcast.net wrote:


Oh and let's add why isn't the aids deaths per 100,000 a per capita
figure?


That the question you needs to answer.You obviously don't know the
difference in ratio and per capita.


Perhaps you should explain it to us.

If you can.

What *****-wits you are -- you don't even know where to start looking
for the answer...poor babeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeees!
.
User: ""

Title: Re: PSA: June 4th is Marriage Protection Sunday 30 May 2006 11:33:54 AM
On Tue, 30 May 2006 16:24:54 GMT, Bitchin' Bonney <bibon@râlant.org>
wrote:

On 30 May 2006 04:45:58 GMT,

(Ray Fischer) wrote:

Bitchin' Bonney <bibon@râlant.org> wrote:

retrogrouch@comcast.net wrote:


Oh and let's add why isn't the aids deaths per 100,000 a per capita
figure?


That the question you needs to answer.You obviously don't know the
difference in ratio and per capita.


Perhaps you should explain it to us.

If you can.


What *****-wits you are -- you don't even know where to start looking
for the answer...poor babeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeees!

Chuckle. we looked to you to prove your point. Silly us.
________________
I am human; nothing in humanity is alien to me.
Terence
.
User: "Bitchin Bonney"

Title: Re: PSA: June 4th is Marriage Protection Sunday 30 May 2006 01:24:50 PM
On Tue, 30 May 2006 09:33:54 -0700,
wrote:

On Tue, 30 May 2006 16:24:54 GMT, Bitchin' Bonney <bibon@râlant.org>
wrote:

On 30 May 2006 04:45:58 GMT,

(Ray Fischer) wrote:

Bitchin' Bonney <bibon@râlant.org> wrote:

wrote:


Oh and let's add why isn't the aids deaths per 100,000 a per capita
figure?


That the question you needs to answer.You obviously don't know the
difference in ratio and per capita.


Perhaps you should explain it to us.

If you can.


What *****-wits you are -- you don't even know where to start looking
for the answer...poor babeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeees!



Chuckle. we looked to you to prove your point. Silly us.

"On Mon, 29 May 2006 18:18:04 -0500, "Jude_Alexander"
<Jude_Alexander@the bayou.la> wrote: I can't find the source right now
but the ones I've provided are good enough."
"On Mon, 29 May 2006 15:25:32 -0500, "Robin"
<robinandtami@hotmail.nospam.com> wrote: You're on the internet
dumbass, look them up for yourself."
How easy it is stepping on you homosexual *****-wits! <SNIGGER>


________________
I am human; nothing in humanity is alien to me.
Terence

.
User: ""

Title: Re: PSA: June 4th is Marriage Protection Sunday 30 May 2006 01:48:51 PM
On Tue, 30 May 2006 18:24:50 GMT, Bitchin' Bonney <bibon@râlant.org>
wrote:

On Tue, 30 May 2006 09:33:54 -0700,

wrote:

On Tue, 30 May 2006 16:24:54 GMT, Bitchin' Bonney <bibon@râlant.org>
wrote:

On 30 May 2006 04:45:58 GMT,

(Ray Fischer) wrote:

Bitchin' Bonney <bibon@râlant.org> wrote:

wrote:


Oh and let's add why isn't the aids deaths per 100,000 a per capita
figure?


That the question you needs to answer.You obviously don't know the
difference in ratio and per capita.


Perhaps you should explain it to us.

If you can.


What *****-wits you are -- you don't even know where to start looking
for the answer...poor babeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeees!



Chuckle. we looked to you to prove your point. Silly us.


"On Mon, 29 May 2006 18:18:04 -0500, "Jude_Alexander"
<Jude_Alexander@the bayou.la> wrote: I can't find the source right now
but the ones I've provided are good enough."


"On Mon, 29 May 2006 15:25:32 -0500, "Robin"
<robinandtami@hotmail.nospam.com> wrote: You're on the internet
dumbass, look them up for yourself."


How easy it is stepping on you homosexual *****-wits! <SNIGGER>

Yeah we knew you couldn't back up your BS.
All the name calling and whining in the world doesn't change that you
threw out BS and got called on it with facts and figures that showed
you to be a liar and you followed that with proving your ignorance of
the concepts.
Sigh.
You're beginning to lose your amusement value.
DO something outrageous.
________________
I am human; nothing in humanity is alien to me.
Terence
.
User: "Bitchin Bonney"

Title: Re: PSA: June 4th is Marriage Protection Sunday 31 May 2006 02:02:14 AM
On Tue, 30 May 2006 11:48:51 -0700,
wrote:

On Tue, 30 May 2006 18:24:50 GMT, Bitchin' Bonney <bibon@râlant.org>
wrote:

On Tue, 30 May 2006 09:33:54 -0700,

wrote:

On Tue, 30 May 2006 16:24:54 GMT, Bitchin' Bonney <bibon@râlant.org>
wrote:

On 30 May 2006 04:45:58 GMT,

(Ray Fischer) wrote:

Bitchin' Bonney <bibon@râlant.org> wrote:

wrote:


Oh and let's add why isn't the aids deaths per 100,000 a per capita
figure?


That the question you needs to answer.You obviously don't know the
difference in ratio and per capita.


Perhaps you should explain it to us.

If you can.


What *****-wits you are -- you don't even know where to start looking
for the answer...poor babeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeees!



Chuckle. we looked to you to prove your point. Silly us.


"On Mon, 29 May 2006 18:18:04 -0500, "Jude_Alexander"
<Jude_Alexander@the bayou.la> wrote: I can't find the source right now
but the ones I've provided are good enough."


"On Mon, 29 May 2006 15:25:32 -0500, "Robin"
<robinandtami@hotmail.nospam.com> wrote: You're on the internet
dumbass, look them up for yourself."


How easy it is stepping on you homosexual *****-wits! <SNIGGER>



Yeah we knew you couldn't back up your BS.

All the name calling and whining in the world doesn't change that you
threw out BS and got called on it with facts and figures that showed
you to be a liar and you followed that with proving your ignorance of
the concepts.

You got your ***** Wupped. Be a man and admit it.

Sigh

You're beginning to lose your amusement value.

You haven't. I find you to be a true "*****-Clown".
(...)


________________
I am human; nothing in humanity is alien to me.
Terence

.


User: "Mark K. Bilbo"

Title: Re: PSA: June 4th is Marriage Protection Sunday 30 May 2006 06:01:01 PM
Previously, on alt.atheism, Bitchin' Bonney in episode
<7i3p72173ul5cmd67dft1jrrcqg5fm2jtg@4ax.com>...

On Tue, 30 May 2006 09:33:54 -0700,

wrote:

On Tue, 30 May 2006 16:24:54 GMT, Bitchin' Bonney <bibon@râlant.org>
wrote:

On 30 May 2006 04:45:58 GMT,

(Ray Fischer) wrote:

Bitchin' Bonney <bibon@râlant.org> wrote:

wrote:


Oh and let's add why isn't the aids deaths per 100,000 a per capita
figure?


That the question you needs to answer.You obviously don't know the
difference in ratio and per capita.


Perhaps you should explain it to us.

If you can.


What *****-wits you are -- you don't even know where to start looking for
the answer...poor babeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeees!



Chuckle. we looked to you to prove your point. Silly us.


"On Mon, 29 May 2006 18:18:04 -0500, "Jude_Alexander"
<Jude_Alexander@the bayou.la> wrote: I can't find the source right now but
the ones I've provided are good enough."


"On Mon, 29 May 2006 15:25:32 -0500, "Robin"
<robinandtami@hotmail.nospam.com> wrote: You're on the internet dumbass,
look them up for yourself."

Neither one of those people were in the current exchange.
--
Mark K. Bilbo
--------------------------------------------------
"As hip as it is for outsiders to blame New Orleans
for everything bad that happened during and after
Hurricane Katrina, the truth is that the people
who lived here were much more prepared for a big
storm than the federal government that promised
us flood protection." [Jarvis DeBerry]
http://makeashorterlink.com/?V180525DC
"Everything New Orleans"
http://www.nola.com
.
















  Page 3 of 7

1

 

2

 

3

 

4

 

5

 

6

 

7

 


Related Articles
Evil Bible Quote of the Day for June 1 (How Many Gods?)
Evil Bible Quote of the Day for June 2 (The Destruction of Tyre)
Evil Bible Quote of the Day for June 12 (Infidels and Gays Should Die)
Bible Quote of the Day for June 9 (think not that I have come to abolish the law)
Bible Quote of the Day for June 10 (you will never get out till you have paid the last penny)
American Atheists press release - June 14, 2004
Evil Bible Quote of the Day for June 16 (Murder and Conquest)
American Atheists Utah Director on the air June 22, 2004
Evil Bible Quote of the Day for June 17 (Temple Slaves)
Latest raning from the Family Research Council -- June 17, 2004
Evil Bible Quote of the Day for June 20 (Iron Chariots Defeat God)
Bible quote of the day for June 21 (judge not, that you be not judged)
June 22, 2004 Family Research Council madness . . .
Evil Bible Quote of the Day for June 24 (Kill Witches)
aa - The polls are open! AQOTM for June 2004
 

NEWER

pg.3802     pg.2110     pg.1170     pg.648     pg.358     pg.197     pg.108     pg.59     pg.32     pg.17     pg.9     pg.5     pg.3     pg.1

OLDER