| Topic: |
Religions > Atheism |
| User: |
"" |
| Date: |
24 May 2006 11:17:16 PM |
| Object: |
PSA: June 4th is Marriage Protection Sunday |
http://www.bpnews.net/bpnews.asp?ID=23282
Marriage Protection Sunday: Churches encouraged to address 'gay marriage'
June 4
WASHINGTON (BP)--The Ethics & Religious Liberty Commission is asking
Southern Baptist churches to consider observing Marriage Protection Sunday
June 4, the eve of Senate debate on a constitutional amendment regarding the
issue.
Senators are scheduled to begin consideration of the Marriage Protection
Amendment June 5, with a floor vote expected June 6 or 7. The MPA, S.J. Res.
1, defines marriage as only between a man and a woman. The proposal is
designed to protect the institution against continuing legal efforts to
legalize "homosexual marriage."
The ERLC, the Southern Baptist Convention's public policy entity, is
requesting pastors to address "same-sex marriage" June 4 and to encourage
church members to ask their senators to support the amendment.
"Supporters of traditional marriage need to bombard their senators' offices
with e-mails and phone calls," ERLC President Richard Land told Baptist
Press, "and preachers across America need to let the pulpit ring forth in
clear and no uncertain terms on Marriage Protection Sunday, June 4, and help
create a groundswell of support for this amendment. I can assure you the
opponents of traditional marriage are doing their best to let their voices
be heard in the corridors of the Senate. It is up to us to let our voices be
heard loudly as well."
Massachusetts is the only state to have legalized "same-sex marriage," but
state supreme courts in New Jersey, New York and Washington could legitimize
such unions before the end of the year.
--
----------
J Young
youngopinions@aol.com
.
|
|
| User: "Bitchin Bonney" |
|
| Title: Re: PSA: June 4th is Marriage Protection Sunday |
29 May 2006 07:38:45 PM |
|
|
On Mon, 29 May 2006 11:10:43 -0500, "Mark K. Bilbo"
<alt-atheism@org.webmaster> wrote:
Previously, on alt.atheism, Bitchin' Bonney in episode
<crsh729ehlbtu3qtuipoo0ff50fv9cqplm@4ax.com>...
On Sat, 27 May 2006 12:02:29 -0700, wrote:
On Sat, 27 May 2006 04:05:58 GMT, <bibon@râlant.org> wrote:
On Fri, 26 May 2006 20:12:02 -0500, "Mark K. Bilbo"
<alt-atheism@org.webmaster> wrote:
Previously, on alt.atheism, Bitchin' Bonney in episode
<0mse7299dkmqs637qg5gpgnl6trg7brj67@4ax.com>...
On Fri, 26 May 2006 08:08:46 -0700, wrote:
On Fri, 26 May 2006 01:04:35 GMT, B <bibon@râlant.org> wrote:
On Thu, 25 May 2006 18:50:46 -0500, "Mark K. Bilbo"
<alt-atheism@org.webmaster> wrote:
And Massachusetts has one of the lowest divorce rates (if not the
lowest) in the country.
And because of it's excessive per capita homosexual count it is said
to have an extraordinarily high AIDS death rate.
"said to have"? In other words you're making it up as you go along.
Sheesh, how pathetic.
Silly boy.
You are confused boy, you're trying to compare fruit with disease. My
comment was about
Per capita. And he showed you per capita numbers. Now you're having a
tantrum because you were shown to be full of *****.
No, he "showed" number of AIDS cases. I referred to something totally
different. Pay attention or keep your mouth shut.
Chuckle. Here's exactly what I posted:
Silly boy.
http://www.avert.org/usastats.htm
The Massachusetts rate is 8.8/100,000
Mississippi's is 16.5.
Texas is 14.7., Georgia 18.6.
The national average is 14.9
Do you want to take another try and make up some BS that is almost
believable?
Why certainly, I'm pleased to tell you how fucked up you are. You're
totally fucked up. What you posted has nothing, nada, zilch, ZERO to do
with the per capita AIDS cases among homosexuals. Now do us all a favor
and *****, nitwit.
So then you'll be posting figures for the per capita AIDS cases among
homosexuals?
No. the CDC does that. Didn't you know?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Mark K. Bilbo" |
|
| Title: Re: PSA: June 4th is Marriage Protection Sunday |
29 May 2006 08:29:49 PM |
|
|
Previously, on alt.atheism, Bitchin' Bonney in episode
<ba5n72l5o2o7lmp02cfjqkkiamf7fdge6s@4ax.com>...
On Mon, 29 May 2006 11:10:43 -0500, "Mark K. Bilbo"
<alt-atheism@org.webmaster> wrote:
Previously, on alt.atheism, Bitchin' Bonney in episode
<crsh729ehlbtu3qtuipoo0ff50fv9cqplm@4ax.com>...
On Sat, 27 May 2006 12:02:29 -0700, wrote:
On Sat, 27 May 2006 04:05:58 GMT, <bibon@râlant.org> wrote:
On Fri, 26 May 2006 20:12:02 -0500, "Mark K. Bilbo"
<alt-atheism@org.webmaster> wrote:
Previously, on alt.atheism, Bitchin' Bonney in episode
<0mse7299dkmqs637qg5gpgnl6trg7brj67@4ax.com>...
On Fri, 26 May 2006 08:08:46 -0700, wrote:
On Fri, 26 May 2006 01:04:35 GMT, B <bibon@râlant.org> wrote:
On Thu, 25 May 2006 18:50:46 -0500, "Mark K. Bilbo"
<alt-atheism@org.webmaster> wrote:
And Massachusetts has one of the lowest divorce rates (if not the
lowest) in the country.
And because of it's excessive per capita homosexual count it is
said to have an extraordinarily high AIDS death rate.
"said to have"? In other words you're making it up as you go
along.
Sheesh, how pathetic.
Silly boy.
You are confused boy, you're trying to compare fruit with disease.
My comment was about
Per capita. And he showed you per capita numbers. Now you're having a
tantrum because you were shown to be full of *****.
No, he "showed" number of AIDS cases. I referred to something totally
different. Pay attention or keep your mouth shut.
Chuckle. Here's exactly what I posted:
Silly boy.
http://www.avert.org/usastats.htm
The Massachusetts rate is 8.8/100,000
Mississippi's is 16.5.
Texas is 14.7., Georgia 18.6.
The national average is 14.9
Do you want to take another try and make up some BS that is almost
believable?
Why certainly, I'm pleased to tell you how fucked up you are. You're
totally fucked up. What you posted has nothing, nada, zilch, ZERO to do
with the per capita AIDS cases among homosexuals. Now do us all a
favor and *****, nitwit.
So then you'll be posting figures for the per capita AIDS cases among
homosexuals?
No.
No? Let's go to tape shall we?
------------
Message-ID: <96lc72tt7a83fnt47ncofetge9mk9ctn44@4ax.com>
Date: Fri, 26 May 2006 01:04:35 GMT
On Thu, 25 May 2006 18:50:46 -0500, "Mark K. Bilbo"
<alt-atheism@org.webmaster> wrote:
And Massachusetts has one of the lowest divorce rates (if not the lowest)
in the country.
And because of it's excessive per capita homosexual count it is said to
have an extraordinarily high AIDS death rate.
------------
Now, suddenly, you don't know any of these figures? Hm.
the CDC does that. Didn't you know?
No, they don't. There's no accurate census of the gay population so
there's no way to figure a per capita. What the CDC does have is general
population based figures. The very kind you don't seem to like much.
And let's go back to what you posted again shall we?
"And because of it's excessive per capita homosexual count..."
This one is rather funny given all your squawking because there's not
actually any such thing as a "per capita count." Per capita is a ratio of
counts, not a count itself. And you seem to be claiming Mass. has a high
number of gays in its populations. You have figures to back that up?
"...it is said to have an extraordinarily high AIDS death rate."
That one went down in flames. Which is probably what's pissing you off so
badly...
--
Mark K. Bilbo
--------------------------------------------------
"As hip as it is for outsiders to blame New Orleans
for everything bad that happened during and after
Hurricane Katrina, the truth is that the people
who lived here were much more prepared for a big
storm than the federal government that promised
us flood protection." [Jarvis DeBerry]
http://makeashorterlink.com/?V180525DC
"Everything New Orleans"
http://www.nola.com
.
|
|
|
| User: "Bitchin Bonney" |
|
| Title: Re: PSA: June 4th is Marriage Protection Sunday |
30 May 2006 11:18:47 AM |
|
|
On Mon, 29 May 2006 20:29:49 -0500, "Mark K. Bilbo"
<alt-atheism@org.webmaster> wrote:
Previously, on alt.atheism, Bitchin' Bonney in episode
<ba5n72l5o2o7lmp02cfjqkkiamf7fdge6s@4ax.com>...
On Mon, 29 May 2006 11:10:43 -0500, "Mark K. Bilbo"
<alt-atheism@org.webmaster> wrote:
Previously, on alt.atheism, Bitchin' Bonney in episode
<crsh729ehlbtu3qtuipoo0ff50fv9cqplm@4ax.com>...
On Sat, 27 May 2006 12:02:29 -0700, wrote:
On Sat, 27 May 2006 04:05:58 GMT, <bibon@râlant.org> wrote:
On Fri, 26 May 2006 20:12:02 -0500, "Mark K. Bilbo"
<alt-atheism@org.webmaster> wrote:
Previously, on alt.atheism, Bitchin' Bonney in episode
<0mse7299dkmqs637qg5gpgnl6trg7brj67@4ax.com>...
On Fri, 26 May 2006 08:08:46 -0700, wrote:
On Fri, 26 May 2006 01:04:35 GMT, B <bibon@râlant.org> wrote:
On Thu, 25 May 2006 18:50:46 -0500, "Mark K. Bilbo"
<alt-atheism@org.webmaster> wrote:
And Massachusetts has one of the lowest divorce rates (if not the
lowest) in the country.
And because of it's excessive per capita homosexual count it is
said to have an extraordinarily high AIDS death rate.
"said to have"? In other words you're making it up as you go
along.
Sheesh, how pathetic.
Silly boy.
You are confused boy, you're trying to compare fruit with disease.
My comment was about
Per capita. And he showed you per capita numbers. Now you're having a
tantrum because you were shown to be full of *****.
No, he "showed" number of AIDS cases. I referred to something totally
different. Pay attention or keep your mouth shut.
Chuckle. Here's exactly what I posted:
Silly boy.
http://www.avert.org/usastats.htm
The Massachusetts rate is 8.8/100,000
Mississippi's is 16.5.
Texas is 14.7., Georgia 18.6.
The national average is 14.9
Do you want to take another try and make up some BS that is almost
believable?
Why certainly, I'm pleased to tell you how fucked up you are. You're
totally fucked up. What you posted has nothing, nada, zilch, ZERO to do
with the per capita AIDS cases among homosexuals. Now do us all a
favor and *****, nitwit.
So then you'll be posting figures for the per capita AIDS cases among
homosexuals?
No.
No? Let's go to tape shall we?
------------
Message-ID: <96lc72tt7a83fnt47ncofetge9mk9ctn44@4ax.com>
Date: Fri, 26 May 2006 01:04:35 GMT
On Thu, 25 May 2006 18:50:46 -0500, "Mark K. Bilbo"
<alt-atheism@org.webmaster> wrote:
And Massachusetts has one of the lowest divorce rates (if not the lowest)
in the country.
And because of it's excessive per capita homosexual count it is said to
have an extraordinarily high AIDS death rate.
------------
Now, suddenly, you don't know any of these figures? Hm.
the CDC does that. Didn't you know?
No, they don't. There's no accurate census of the gay population so
there's no way to figure a per capita. What the CDC does have is general
population based figures. The very kind you don't seem to like much.
And let's go back to what you posted again shall we?
"And because of it's excessive per capita homosexual count..."
This one is rather funny given all your squawking because there's not
actually any such thing as a "per capita count." Per capita is a ratio of
counts, not a count itself. And you seem to be claiming Mass. has a high
number of gays in its populations. You have figures to back that up?
"...it is said to have an extraordinarily high AIDS death rate."
That one went down in flames. Which is probably what's pissing you off so
badly...
Another COONASS fantasy
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: PSA: June 4th is Marriage Protection Sunday |
27 May 2006 01:59:59 PM |
|
|
On Sat, 27 May 2006 04:05:58 GMT, <bibon@râlant.org> wrote:
On Fri, 26 May 2006 20:12:02 -0500, "Mark K. Bilbo"
<alt-atheism@org.webmaster> wrote:
Previously, on alt.atheism, Bitchin' Bonney in episode
<0mse7299dkmqs637qg5gpgnl6trg7brj67@4ax.com>...
On Fri, 26 May 2006 08:08:46 -0700, wrote:
On Fri, 26 May 2006 01:04:35 GMT, B <bibon@râlant.org> wrote:
On Thu, 25 May 2006 18:50:46 -0500, "Mark K. Bilbo"
<alt-atheism@org.webmaster> wrote:
And Massachusetts has one of the lowest divorce rates (if not the
lowest) in the country.
And because of it's excessive per capita homosexual count it is said to
have an extraordinarily high AIDS death rate.
"said to have"? In other words you're making it up as you go along.
Sheesh, how pathetic.
Silly boy.
You are confused boy, you're trying to compare fruit with disease. My
comment was about
Per capita. And he showed you per capita numbers. Now you're having a
tantrum because you were shown to be full of *****.
No, he "showed" number of AIDS cases. I referred to something totally
different. Pay attention or keep your mouth shut.
Chuckle. I showed you to be a liar and a fool by posting the per
capita rates that showed you were making up your claim.
________________
I am human; nothing in humanity is alien to me.
Terence
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Mark K. Bilbo" |
|
| Title: Re: PSA: June 4th is Marriage Protection Sunday |
27 May 2006 05:25:28 AM |
|
|
Previously, on alt.atheism, bibon in episode
<n8kf72pfiodbh9shs6mkk240j2oupaqkqj@4ax.com>...
On Fri, 26 May 2006 20:12:02 -0500, "Mark K. Bilbo"
<alt-atheism@org.webmaster> wrote:
Previously, on alt.atheism, Bitchin' Bonney in episode
<0mse7299dkmqs637qg5gpgnl6trg7brj67@4ax.com>...
On Fri, 26 May 2006 08:08:46 -0700, wrote:
On Fri, 26 May 2006 01:04:35 GMT, B <bibon@râlant.org> wrote:
On Thu, 25 May 2006 18:50:46 -0500, "Mark K. Bilbo"
<alt-atheism@org.webmaster> wrote:
And Massachusetts has one of the lowest divorce rates (if not the
lowest) in the country.
And because of it's excessive per capita homosexual count it is said
to have an extraordinarily high AIDS death rate.
"said to have"? In other words you're making it up as you go along.
Sheesh, how pathetic.
Silly boy.
You are confused boy, you're trying to compare fruit with disease. My
comment was about
Per capita. And he showed you per capita numbers. Now you're having a
tantrum because you were shown to be full of *****.
No, he "showed" number of AIDS cases. I referred to something totally
different. Pay attention or keep your mouth shut.
No he showed you *per *capita AIDS cases. You can't have an "AIDS death
rate" without AIDS cases. And if the per capita number of cases is
low--which it is--but the per capita population of gays is high--as you
claimed--that means Mass. is doing even better than the already low
per capita case numbers indicate.
You have any cites to back up your wild little assertion or are you just
going to have a tantrum?
--
Mark K. Bilbo
--------------------------------------------------
"As hip as it is for outsiders to blame New Orleans
for everything bad that happened during and after
Hurricane Katrina, the truth is that the people
who lived here were much more prepared for a big
storm than the federal government that promised
us flood protection." [Jarvis DeBerry]
http://makeashorterlink.com/?V180525DC
"Everything New Orleans"
http://www.nola.com
.
|
|
|
| User: "Boy Toy" |
|
| Title: Re: PSA: June 4th is Marriage Protection Sunday |
27 May 2006 07:55:00 AM |
|
|
On Sat, 27 May 2006 05:25:28 -0500, "Mark K. Bilbo"
<alt-atheism@org.webmaster> wrote in message
<koOdnZL5d4CFtOXZnZ2dneKdnZydnZ2d@megapath.net>
Previously, on alt.atheism, bibon in episode
<n8kf72pfiodbh9shs6mkk240j2oupaqkqj@4ax.com>...
On Fri, 26 May 2006 20:12:02 -0500, "Mark K. Bilbo"
<alt-atheism@org.webmaster> wrote:
Previously, on alt.atheism, Bitchin' Bonney in episode
<0mse7299dkmqs637qg5gpgnl6trg7brj67@4ax.com>...
On Fri, 26 May 2006 08:08:46 -0700, wrote:
On Fri, 26 May 2006 01:04:35 GMT, B <bibon@râlant.org> wrote:
On Thu, 25 May 2006 18:50:46 -0500, "Mark K. Bilbo"
<alt-atheism@org.webmaster> wrote:
And Massachusetts has one of the lowest divorce rates (if not the
lowest) in the country.
And because of it's excessive per capita homosexual count it is said
to have an extraordinarily high AIDS death rate.
"said to have"? In other words you're making it up as you go along.
Sheesh, how pathetic.
Silly boy.
You are confused boy, you're trying to compare fruit with disease. My
comment was about
Per capita. And he showed you per capita numbers. Now you're having a
tantrum because you were shown to be full of *****.
No, he "showed" number of AIDS cases. I referred to something totally
different. Pay attention or keep your mouth shut.
No he showed you *per *capita AIDS cases. You can't have an "AIDS death
rate" without AIDS cases. And if the per capita number of cases is
low--which it is--but the per capita population of gays is high--as you
claimed--that means Mass. is doing even better than the already low
per capita case numbers indicate.
You have any cites to back up your wild little assertion or are you just
going to have a tantrum?
This is really cool. I'd like to see how "The Massachusetts rate is
8.8/100,000" is an *absolute", and *not* per capita, value.
It proves what I suspected all along. BB *doesn't understand* the
meaning of "per capita," and is just parroting newsletters and
websites written by equally ignorant people.
If he suspects he has been proven wrong, he will also snip out the
relevant part of a post to disguise this fact. BB is just another
pathetically ignorant troll, unworthy of the effort required to bring
him up to the intellectual level of the eighth grade.
He is too stupid to learn.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: PSA: June 4th is Marriage Protection Sunday |
27 May 2006 01:17:57 PM |
|
|
On Sat, 27 May 2006 05:25:28 -0500, "Mark K. Bilbo"
<alt-atheism@org.webmaster> wrote:
No he showed you *per *capita AIDS cases. You can't have an "AIDS death
rate" without AIDS cases. And if the per capita number of cases is
low--which it is--but the per capita population of gays is high--as you
claimed--that means Mass. is doing even better than the already low
per capita case numbers indicate.
When you get on the right page, *****-WIT, get back in the discussion.
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: PSA: June 4th is Marriage Protection Sunday |
27 May 2006 02:18:13 PM |
|
|
On Sat, 27 May 2006 18:17:57 GMT, <bibon@râlant.org> wrote:
On Sat, 27 May 2006 05:25:28 -0500, "Mark K. Bilbo"
<alt-atheism@org.webmaster> wrote:
No he showed you *per *capita AIDS cases. You can't have an "AIDS death
rate" without AIDS cases. And if the per capita number of cases is
low--which it is--but the per capita population of gays is high--as you
claimed--that means Mass. is doing even better than the already low
per capita case numbers indicate.
When you get on the right page,
Ah that's where the problem comes from. Your singing from the hymnal,
while the rest of the people in the discussion are t-h-i-n-k-i-n-g.
*****-WIT, get back in the discussion.
Silly boy.
http://www.avert.org/usastats.htm
The Massachusetts rate is 8.8/100,000
Mississippi's is 16.5.
Texas is 14.7., Georgia 18.6.
The national average is 14.9
Do you want to take another try and make up some BS that is almost
believable?
<end repost>
________________
I am human; nothing in humanity is alien to me.
Terence
.
|
|
|
| User: "Boy Toy" |
|
| Title: Re: PSA: June 4th is Marriage Protection Sunday |
27 May 2006 03:58:48 PM |
|
|
On Sat, 27 May 2006 12:18:13 -0700, wrote in
message <rd9h72dmt5ahvo6voq1ak1bb99osdcg4c6@4ax.com>
On Sat, 27 May 2006 18:17:57 GMT, <bibon@râlant.org> wrote:
On Sat, 27 May 2006 05:25:28 -0500, "Mark K. Bilbo"
<alt-atheism@org.webmaster> wrote:
No he showed you *per *capita AIDS cases. You can't have an "AIDS death
rate" without AIDS cases. And if the per capita number of cases is
low--which it is--but the per capita population of gays is high--as you
claimed--that means Mass. is doing even better than the already low
per capita case numbers indicate.
When you get on the right page,
Ah that's where the problem comes from. Your singing from the hymnal,
while the rest of the people in the discussion are t-h-i-n-k-i-n-g.
*****-WIT, get back in the discussion.
Silly boy.
http://www.avert.org/usastats.htm
The Massachusetts rate is 8.8/100,000
Mississippi's is 16.5.
Texas is 14.7., Georgia 18.6.
The national average is 14.9
Do you want to take another try and make up some BS that is almost
believable?
<end repost>
________________
I am human; nothing in humanity is alien to me.
Terence
See Bonnie. See Bitchin' Bonnie. See Bitchin' Bonnie *****. See
Bitchin' Bonney lie. See Bitchin' Bonney dissemble. See Bitchin'
Bonney squirm. ROFLMAO!
.
|
|
|
| User: "Bitchin Bonney" |
|
| Title: Re: PSA: June 4th is Marriage Protection Sunday |
27 May 2006 07:54:09 PM |
|
|
On Sat, 27 May 2006 14:58:48 -0600, Boy Toy <BoyToy@Toyz4Boyz.com>
wrote:
On Sat, 27 May 2006 12:18:13 -0700, wrote in
message <rd9h72dmt5ahvo6voq1ak1bb99osdcg4c6@4ax.com>
On Sat, 27 May 2006 18:17:57 GMT, <bibon@râlant.org> wrote:
On Sat, 27 May 2006 05:25:28 -0500, "Mark K. Bilbo"
<alt-atheism@org.webmaster> wrote:
No he showed you *per *capita AIDS cases. You can't have an "AIDS death
rate" without AIDS cases. And if the per capita number of cases is
low--which it is--but the per capita population of gays is high--as you
claimed--that means Mass. is doing even better than the already low
per capita case numbers indicate.
When you get on the right page,
Ah that's where the problem comes from. Your singing from the hymnal,
while the rest of the people in the discussion are t-h-i-n-k-i-n-g.
*****-WIT, get back in the discussion.
Silly boy.
http://www.avert.org/usastats.htm
The Massachusetts rate is 8.8/100,000
Mississippi's is 16.5.
Texas is 14.7., Georgia 18.6.
The national average is 14.9
Do you want to take another try and make up some BS that is almost
believable?
<end repost>
________________
I am human; nothing in humanity is alien to me.
Terence
See Bonnie. See Bitchin' Bonnie. See Bitchin' Bonnie *****. See
Bitchin' Bonney lie. See Bitchin' Bonney dissemble. See Bitchin'
Bonney squirm. ROFLMAO!
See the boy the homos ***** like a toy make an ***** of himself.
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: PSA: June 4th is Marriage Protection Sunday |
27 May 2006 07:49:12 PM |
|
|
On Sat, 27 May 2006 12:18:13 -0700, wrote:
On Sat, 27 May 2006 18:17:57 GMT, <bibon@râlant.org> wrote:
On Sat, 27 May 2006 05:25:28 -0500, "Mark K. Bilbo"
<alt-atheism@org.webmaster> wrote:
No he showed you *per *capita AIDS cases. You can't have an "AIDS death
rate" without AIDS cases. And if the per capita number of cases is
low--which it is--but the per capita population of gays is high--as you
claimed--that means Mass. is doing even better than the already low
per capita case numbers indicate.
When you get on the right page,
Ah that's where the problem comes from. Your singing from the hymnal,
while the rest of the people in the discussion are t-h-i-n-k-i-n-g.
*****-WIT, get back in the discussion.
Silly boy.
http://www.avert.org/usastats.htm
The Massachusetts rate is 8.8/100,000
Mississippi's is 16.5.
Texas is 14.7., Georgia 18.6.
The national average is 14.9
Do you want to take another try and make up some BS that is almost
believable?
You're still totally FUCKD UP. The numbers have nothing to do with the
per capita rate of AIDS cases among homosexuals. You must enjoy being
a *****-wit, and showing it publicly.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Bernard Hubbard" |
|
| Title: Re: PSA: June 4th is Marriage Protection Sunday |
28 May 2006 02:19:13 AM |
|
|
On Sun, 28 May 2006 00:49:12 GMT, <bibon@râlant.org> wrote:
On Sat, 27 May 2006 12:18:13 -0700, wrote:
On Sat, 27 May 2006 18:17:57 GMT, <bibon@râlant.org> wrote:
On Sat, 27 May 2006 05:25:28 -0500, "Mark K. Bilbo"
<alt-atheism@org.webmaster> wrote:
No he showed you *per *capita AIDS cases. You can't have an "AIDS death
rate" without AIDS cases. And if the per capita number of cases is
low--which it is--but the per capita population of gays is high--as you
claimed--that means Mass. is doing even better than the already low
per capita case numbers indicate.
When you get on the right page,
Ah that's where the problem comes from. Your singing from the hymnal,
while the rest of the people in the discussion are t-h-i-n-k-i-n-g.
*****-WIT, get back in the discussion.
Silly boy.
http://www.avert.org/usastats.htm
The Massachusetts rate is 8.8/100,000
Mississippi's is 16.5.
Texas is 14.7., Georgia 18.6.
The national average is 14.9
Do you want to take another try and make up some BS that is almost
believable?
You're still totally FUCKD UP. The numbers have nothing to do with the
per capita rate of AIDS cases among homosexuals. You must enjoy being
a *****-wit, and showing it publicly.
Buster what is the actual gay population number that you are basing
the "per capita" figures on? Do you have an official figure? If so,
could you post the actual URL of the data, otherwise stop spewing
rubbish about "per capita" this and "per capita" that. Without
knowing the total population and the populations of heterosexuals and
homosexuals you have no way whatsoever of getting to a "per capita"
basis. If you don't believe me, which I strongly suggest< you need to
study remedial statistics 101.
--
"Genius may have its limitations, but stupidity is not thus
handicapped."~Elbert Hubbard to quote a relative of mine.
Bernard Hubbard
.
|
|
|
| User: "Bitchin Bonney" |
|
| Title: Re: PSA: June 4th is Marriage Protection Sunday |
28 May 2006 12:22:34 PM |
|
|
On Sun, 28 May 2006 17:19:13 +1000, Bernard Hubbard
<bernard1958@west.net.au> wrote:
Without
knowing the total population and the populations of heterosexuals and
homosexuals you have no way whatsoever of getting to a "per capita"
basis. If you don't believe me, which I strongly suggest< you need to
study remedial statistics 101.
--
Yet you, the lying ***** sucker that you are, attempt to bull *****
people into thinking that you have posted some reliable information on
the topic being discussed when all you have done is pull some more
homo-***** out of your ***** hole.
GO AWAY *****-for-brains.
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: PSA: June 4th is Marriage Protection Sunday |
28 May 2006 02:34:05 PM |
|
|
On Sun, 28 May 2006 17:22:34 GMT, Bitchin' Bonney <bibon@râlant.org>
wrote:
On Sun, 28 May 2006 17:19:13 +1000, Bernard Hubbard
<bernard1958@west.net.au> wrote:
Without
knowing the total population and the populations of heterosexuals and
homosexuals you have no way whatsoever of getting to a "per capita"
basis. If you don't believe me, which I strongly suggest< you need to
study remedial statistics 101.
--
Yet you, the lying ***** sucker that you are, attempt to bull *****
people into thinking that you have posted some reliable information on
the topic being discussed when all you have done is pull some more
homo-***** out of your ***** hole.
GO AWAY *****-for-brains.
Chuckle. Let's see?
The topic was aids deaths in MASS.
And we posted:
http://www.statehealthfacts.org/cgi-bin/healthfacts.cgi?action=compare&category=HIV%2fAIDS&subcategory=Persons+Living+with+AIDS&topic=Persons+Living+with+AIDS+All+Ages
and
http://www.avert.org/usastats.htm
which list numerous state by state comparisons on aids cases, deaths
and per capita figures.
And all you can do is swear, stamp your feet and pretend it's not on
point?
________________
I am human; nothing in humanity is alien to me.
Terence
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Bernard Hubbard" |
|
| Title: Re: PSA: June 4th is Marriage Protection Sunday |
29 May 2006 01:41:18 AM |
|
|
On Sun, 28 May 2006 17:22:34 GMT, Bitchin' Bonney <bibon@râlant.org>
wrote:
On Sun, 28 May 2006 17:19:13 +1000, Bernard Hubbard
<bernard1958@west.net.au> wrote:
Without
knowing the total population and the populations of heterosexuals and
homosexuals you have no way whatsoever of getting to a "per capita"
basis. If you don't believe me, which I strongly suggest< you need to
study remedial statistics 101.
--
Yet you, the lying ***** sucker that you are, attempt to bull *****
people into thinking that you have posted some reliable information on
the topic being discussed when all you have done is pull some more
homo-***** out of your ***** hole.
My we are certainly fixated on arse holes aren't we.
BTW I challenge you to a rigorous debate on the concept of per capita
statistics. I doubt that I would loose as I was a University lecturer
in Statistics before my retirement.
GO AWAY *****-for-brains.
--
"Genius may have its limitations, but stupidity is not thus
handicapped."~Elbert Hubbard to quote a relative of mine.
Bernard Hubbard
.
|
|
|
| User: "Boy Toy" |
|
| Title: Re: PSA: June 4th is Marriage Protection Sunday |
29 May 2006 09:42:50 AM |
|
|
On Mon, 29 May 2006 16:41:18 +1000, Bernard Hubbard
<bernard1958@west.net.au> wrote in message
<fl5l72ht087j8uq2s6c7vqqbd10d8699fl@4ax.com>
On Sun, 28 May 2006 17:22:34 GMT, Bitchin' Bonney <bibon@râlant.org>
wrote:
On Sun, 28 May 2006 17:19:13 +1000, Bernard Hubbard
<bernard1958@west.net.au> wrote:
Without
knowing the total population and the populations of heterosexuals and
homosexuals you have no way whatsoever of getting to a "per capita"
basis. If you don't believe me, which I strongly suggest< you need to
study remedial statistics 101.
--
Yet you, the lying ***** sucker that you are, attempt to bull *****
people into thinking that you have posted some reliable information on
the topic being discussed when all you have done is pull some more
homo-***** out of your ***** hole.
My we are certainly fixated on arse holes aren't we.
BTW I challenge you to a rigorous debate on the concept of per capita
statistics. I doubt that I would loose as I was a University lecturer
in Statistics before my retirement.
Sure, but do you have buildings named after you, doctors working for
you and ostrich leather boots? And do you own any bridges?
GO AWAY *****-for-brains.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Bitchin Bonney" |
|
| Title: Re: PSA: June 4th is Marriage Protection Sunday |
29 May 2006 07:26:05 PM |
|
|
On Mon, 29 May 2006 16:41:18 +1000, Bernard Hubbard
<bernard1958@west.net.au> wrote:
My we are certainly fixated on arse holes aren't we.
BTW I challenge you to a rigorous debate on the concept of per capita
statistics. I doubt that I would loose as I was a University lecturer
in Statistics before my retirement.
AIDS induced no doubt. No I never take advantage of the sick and
infirm and you were obviously mentally impaired from the beginning
anyway. I would question an institute of higher learning that would
hire one to lecture on statistic who didn't know the difference
between ratio and per capita.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: PSA: June 4th is Marriage Protection Sunday |
28 May 2006 10:15:04 AM |
|
|
On Sun, 28 May 2006 17:19:13 +1000, Bernard Hubbard
<bernard1958@west.net.au> wrote:
You're still totally FUCKD UP. The numbers have nothing to do with the
per capita rate of AIDS cases among homosexuals. You must enjoy being
a *****-wit, and showing it publicly.
Buster what is the actual gay population number that you are basing
the "per capita" figures on? Do you have an official figure? If so,
could you post the actual URL of the data, otherwise stop spewing
rubbish about "per capita" this and "per capita" that. Without
knowing the total population and the populations of heterosexuals and
homosexuals you have no way whatsoever of getting to a "per capita"
basis. If you don't believe me, which I strongly suggest< you need to
study remedial statistics 101.
Studies have shown the rate of homosexuality is near constant across
all human cultures. No adults move and choose places to live, (hence
San Francisco has a larger gay population/capita than most of the
country. But outside of a few cultural concentrations, the rate is
about the same everywhere.
His notion of Mass. is based only on his hate of liberalism and Mass's
reputation as the "most liberal" state.
Meanwhile aids rates are far higher in MS, GA, SC, and other red
states.
Rank
HIV Death Rate
Rank
HIV Death Rate
United States 4.7 1
1 District of Columbia 43.3
2 Maryland 11.1
3 Florida 10.4
4 Delaware 9.7
5 New York 9.6
6 Louisiana 9.1
7 Georgia 7.7
8 New Jersey 7.4
9 Mississippi 7.0
10 South Carolina 6.8
11 North Carolina 5.4
12 Connecticut 5.1
13 Tennessee 5.0
14 Texas 4.8
15 Alabama 4.3
16 California 3.9
17 Pennsylvania 3.8
17 Virginia 3.8
19 Arizona 3.5
19 Illinois 3.5
19 Nevada 3.5
22 Massachusetts 3.4
________________
I am human; nothing in humanity is alien to me.
Terence
.
|
|
|
| User: "Bernard Hubbard" |
|
| Title: Re: PSA: June 4th is Marriage Protection Sunday |
29 May 2006 01:37:06 AM |
|
|
On Sun, 28 May 2006 08:15:04 -0700, wrote:
On Sun, 28 May 2006 17:19:13 +1000, Bernard Hubbard
<bernard1958@west.net.au> wrote:
You're still totally FUCKD UP. The numbers have nothing to do with the
per capita rate of AIDS cases among homosexuals. You must enjoy being
a *****-wit, and showing it publicly.
Buster what is the actual gay population number that you are basing
the "per capita" figures on? Do you have an official figure? If so,
could you post the actual URL of the data, otherwise stop spewing
rubbish about "per capita" this and "per capita" that. Without
knowing the total population and the populations of heterosexuals and
homosexuals you have no way whatsoever of getting to a "per capita"
basis. If you don't believe me, which I strongly suggest< you need to
study remedial statistics 101.
Studies have shown the rate of homosexuality is near constant across
all human cultures. No adults move and choose places to live, (hence
San Francisco has a larger gay population/capita than most of the
country. But outside of a few cultural concentrations, the rate is
about the same everywhere.
But without the actual number being known no one can calculate a per
capita figure due the definition of the term. It's about time that
the bigots gave up on per capita statistics unless they can give the
absolute number in the population being quoted. As there a no
statistics available as to the total population of gays, guesstimates
of between 1% to 10% have been quoted at various times, any PER CAPITA
numbers in relation to gays is purely plucked from the bigots arse.
His notion of Mass. is based only on his hate of liberalism and Mass's
reputation as the "most liberal" state.
Meanwhile aids rates are far higher in MS, GA, SC, and other red
states.
Rank
HIV Death Rate
Rank
HIV Death Rate
United States 4.7 1
1 District of Columbia 43.3
2 Maryland 11.1
3 Florida 10.4
4 Delaware 9.7
5 New York 9.6
6 Louisiana 9.1
7 Georgia 7.7
8 New Jersey 7.4
9 Mississippi 7.0
10 South Carolina 6.8
11 North Carolina 5.4
12 Connecticut 5.1
13 Tennessee 5.0
14 Texas 4.8
15 Alabama 4.3
16 California 3.9
17 Pennsylvania 3.8
17 Virginia 3.8
19 Arizona 3.5
19 Illinois 3.5
19 Nevada 3.5
22 Massachusetts 3.4
________________
I am human; nothing in humanity is alien to me.
Terence
--
"Genius may have its limitations, but stupidity is not thus
handicapped."~Elbert Hubbard to quote a relative of mine.
Bernard Hubbard
.
|
|
|
| User: "Bitchin Bonney" |
|
| Title: Re: PSA: June 4th is Marriage Protection Sunday |
29 May 2006 07:22:32 PM |
|
|
On Mon, 29 May 2006 16:37:06 +1000, Bernard Hubbard
<bernard1958@west.net.au> wrote:
But without the actual number being known no one can calculate a per
capita figure due the definition of the term. It's about time that
the bigots gave up on per capita statistics unless they can give the
absolute number in the population being quoted. As there a no
statistics available as to the total population of gays, guesstimates
of between 1% to 10% have been quoted at various times, any PER CAPITA
numbers in relation to gays is purely plucked from the bigots arse.
Look at that ***** sucker back down!
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: PSA: June 4th is Marriage Protection Sunday |
29 May 2006 08:39:06 AM |
|
|
On Mon, 29 May 2006 16:37:06 +1000, Bernard Hubbard
<bernard1958@west.net.au> wrote:
Studies have shown the rate of homosexuality is near constant across
all human cultures. No adults move and choose places to live, (hence
San Francisco has a larger gay population/capita than most of the
country. But outside of a few cultural concentrations, the rate is
about the same everywhere.
But without the actual number being known no one can calculate a per
capita figure due the definition of the term. It's about time that
the bigots gave up on per capita statistics unless they can give the
absolute number in the population being quoted. As there a no
statistics available as to the total population of gays, guesstimates
of between 1% to 10% have been quoted at various times, any PER CAPITA
numbers in relation to gays is purely plucked from the bigots arse.
Oh absolutely. There's no question Bonnie pulled the claim of a higher
homosexual population in Mass. out of his ***** and then pulled more out
with his claim that "It is said they have a higher aids per capita
death rate".
He knew he was lying and instinctively tried to hide behind "it is
said" and not stating a higher rate than who or where else.
A pretty pathetic act, no question.
You gotta wonder about a guy who spends so much time obsessing about
homosexual sex and writing about sucking and fucking so much. He's got
a very clear obsession. I think this is what passes for his sex life.
________________
I am human; nothing in humanity is alien to me.
Terence
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: PSA: June 4th is Marriage Protection Sunday |
27 May 2006 08:31:52 PM |
|
|
On Sun, 28 May 2006 00:49:12 GMT, <bibon@râlant.org> wrote:
On Sat, 27 May 2006 12:18:13 -0700, wrote:
On Sat, 27 May 2006 18:17:57 GMT, <bibon@râlant.org> wrote:
On Sat, 27 May 2006 05:25:28 -0500, "Mark K. Bilbo"
<alt-atheism@org.webmaster> wrote:
No he showed you *per *capita AIDS cases. You can't have an "AIDS death
rate" without AIDS cases. And if the per capita number of cases is
low--which it is--but the per capita population of gays is high--as you
claimed--that means Mass. is doing even better than the already low
per capita case numbers indicate.
When you get on the right page,
Ah that's where the problem comes from. Your singing from the hymnal,
while the rest of the people in the discussion are t-h-i-n-k-i-n-g.
*****-WIT, get back in the discussion.
Silly boy.
http://www.avert.org/usastats.htm
The Massachusetts rate is 8.8/100,000
Mississippi's is 16.5.
Texas is 14.7., Georgia 18.6.
The national average is 14.9
Do you want to take another try and make up some BS that is almost
believable?
You're still totally FUCKD UP. The numbers have nothing to do with the
per capita rate of AIDS cases among homosexuals. You must enjoy being
a *****-wit, and showing it publicly.
Chuckle.
http://www.statehealthfacts.org/cgi-bin/healthfacts.cgi?previewid=1&action=compare&category=HIV%2fAIDS&subcategory=Deaths&topic=HIV+Death+Rate
Age-Adjusted Death Rate for HIV Disease, 2003
Table
Rank by: View by: #
Rank
HIV Death Rate
Rank
HIV Death Rate
United States 4.7 1
1 District of Columbia 43.3
2 Maryland 11.1
3 Florida 10.4
4 Delaware 9.7
5 New York 9.6
6 Louisiana 9.1
7 Georgia 7.7
8 New Jersey 7.4
9 Mississippi 7.0
10 South Carolina 6.8
11 North Carolina 5.4
12 Connecticut 5.1
13 Tennessee 5.0
14 Texas 4.8
15 Alabama 4.3
16 California 3.9
17 Pennsylvania 3.8
17 Virginia 3.8
19 Arizona 3.5
19 Illinois 3.5
19 Nevada 3.5
22 Massachusetts 3.4
23 Arkansas 2.8
23 Rhode Island 2.8
25 Oklahoma 2.7
26 Oregon 2.6
27 New Mexico 2.4
28 Michigan 2.3
28 Washington 2.3
30 Missouri 2.2
31 Ohio 2.1
32 Indiana 1.9
32 Kansas 1.9
34 Colorado 1.8
35 Hawaii 1.7
35 West Virginia 1.7
37 Kentucky 1.6
38 Wisconsin 1.2
39 Minnesota 1.0
40 Iowa 0.7
Alaska NSD
Idaho NSD
Maine NSD
Montana NSD
Nebraska NSD
New Hampshire NSD
North Dakota NSD
South Dakota NSD
Utah NSD
Vermont NSD
Wyoming NSD
Puerto Rico 13.6 2
Guam NSD 2
Virgin Islands NSD 2
________________
I am human; nothing in humanity is alien to me.
Terence
.
|
|
|
| User: "Bitchin Bonney" |
|
| Title: Re: PSA: June 4th is Marriage Protection Sunday |
27 May 2006 10:15:47 PM |
|
|
On Sat, 27 May 2006 18:31:52 -0700, wrote:
On Sun, 28 May 2006 00:49:12 GMT, <bibon@râlant.org> wrote:
On Sat, 27 May 2006 12:18:13 -0700, wrote:
On Sat, 27 May 2006 18:17:57 GMT, <bibon@râlant.org> wrote:
On Sat, 27 May 2006 05:25:28 -0500, "Mark K. Bilbo"
<alt-atheism@org.webmaster> wrote:
No he showed you *per *capita AIDS cases. You can't have an "AIDS death
rate" without AIDS cases. And if the per capita number of cases is
low--which it is--but the per capita population of gays is high--as you
claimed--that means Mass. is doing even better than the already low
per capita case numbers indicate.
When you get on the right page,
Ah that's where the problem comes from. Your singing from the hymnal,
while the rest of the people in the discussion are t-h-i-n-k-i-n-g.
*****-WIT, get back in the discussion.
Silly boy.
http://www.avert.org/usastats.htm
The Massachusetts rate is 8.8/100,000
Mississippi's is 16.5.
Texas is 14.7., Georgia 18.6.
The national average is 14.9
Do you want to take another try and make up some BS that is almost
believable?
You're still totally FUCKD UP. The numbers have nothing to do with the
per capita rate of AIDS cases among homosexuals. You must enjoy being
a *****-wit, and showing it publicly.
Chuckle.
You better chuckle hot lips. In fact you better smile -- Then it won't
hurt your queer lips when I kick your teeth in. You did notice that I
have already done that in a previous post you fucking ***** clown.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Fritz" |
|
| Title: Re: PSA: June 4th is Marriage Protection Sunday |
28 May 2006 02:43:11 PM |
|
|
Bitchin' Bonney wrote:
On Sat, 27 May 2006 18:31:52 -0700, wrote:
On Sun, 28 May 2006 00:49:12 GMT, <bibon@râlant.org> wrote:
On Sat, 27 May 2006 12:18:13 -0700, wrote:
On Sat, 27 May 2006 18:17:57 GMT, <bibon@râlant.org> wrote:
On Sat, 27 May 2006 05:25:28 -0500, "Mark K. Bilbo"
<alt-atheism@org.webmaster> wrote:
No he showed you *per *capita AIDS cases. You can't have an "AIDS death
rate" without AIDS cases. And if the per capita number of cases is
low--which it is--but the per capita population of gays is high--as you
claimed--that means Mass. is doing even better than the already low
per capita case numbers indicate.
When you get on the right page,
Ah that's where the problem comes from. Your singing from the hymnal,
while the rest of the people in the discussion are t-h-i-n-k-i-n-g.
*****-WIT, get back in the discussion.
Silly boy.
http://www.avert.org/usastats.htm
The Massachusetts rate is 8.8/100,000
Mississippi's is 16.5.
Texas is 14.7., Georgia 18.6.
The national average is 14.9
Do you want to take another try and make up some BS that is almost
believable?
You're still totally FUCKD UP. The numbers have nothing to do with the
per capita rate of AIDS cases among homosexuals. You must enjoy being
a *****-wit, and showing it publicly.
Chuckle.
You better chuckle hot lips. In fact you better smile -- Then it won't
hurt your queer lips when I kick your teeth in. You did notice that I
have already done that in a previous post you fucking ***** clown.
Thee does talk some twaddle.
--
FRITZ...
--
Posted via NewsDemon.com - Premium Uncensored Newsgroup Service
------->>>>>>http://www.NewsDemon.com<<<<<<------
Unlimited Access, Anonymous Accounts, Uncensored Broadband Access
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "james g. keegan jr." |
|
| Title: Re: PSA: June 4th is Marriage Protection Sunday |
28 May 2006 12:15:59 PM |
|
|
In article <9l5i721pqg6op5m3929h4q19g6lal8lhv5@4ax.com>,
Bitchin' Bonney <bibon@râlant.org> wrote:
On Sat, 27 May 2006 18:31:52 -0700, wrote:
You better chuckle hot lips. In fact you better smile -- Then it won't
hurt your queer lips when I kick your teeth in. You did notice that I
have already done that in a previous post you fucking ***** clown.
goodness you surely mention homosexuals and violence is many posts!!!
you do know about protesting too much, do you not?
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: PSA: June 4th is Marriage Protection Sunday |
28 May 2006 10:10:13 AM |
|
|
On Sun, 28 May 2006 03:15:47 GMT, Bitchin' Bonney <bibon@râlant.org>
wrote:
On Sat, 27 May 2006 18:31:52 -0700, wrote:
On Sun, 28 May 2006 00:49:12 GMT, <bibon@râlant.org> wrote:
On Sat, 27 May 2006 12:18:13 -0700, wrote:
On Sat, 27 May 2006 18:17:57 GMT, <bibon@râlant.org> wrote:
On Sat, 27 May 2006 05:25:28 -0500, "Mark K. Bilbo"
<alt-atheism@org.webmaster> wrote:
No he showed you *per *capita AIDS cases. You can't have an "AIDS death
rate" without AIDS cases. And if the per capita number of cases is
low--which it is--but the per capita population of gays is high--as you
claimed--that means Mass. is doing even better than the already low
per capita case numbers indicate.
When you get on the right page,
Ah that's where the problem comes from. Your singing from the hymnal,
while the rest of the people in the discussion are t-h-i-n-k-i-n-g.
*****-WIT, get back in the discussion.
Silly boy.
http://www.avert.org/usastats.htm
The Massachusetts rate is 8.8/100,000
Mississippi's is 16.5.
Texas is 14.7., Georgia 18.6.
The national average is 14.9
Do you want to take another try and make up some BS that is almost
believable?
You're still totally FUCKD UP. The numbers have nothing to do with the
per capita rate of AIDS cases among homosexuals. You must enjoy being
a *****-wit, and showing it publicly.
Chuckle.
You better chuckle hot lips. In fact you better smile -- Then it won't
hurt your queer lips when I kick your teeth in.
Ah what a "he-man". You only see this kind of raging homophobia in
repressed gays. Here you are sniping from your closet.
You did notice that I
have already done that in a previous post you fucking ***** clown.
I do notice a lot of name calling and rage. No logic or argument. I
guess you have to work with what you've got.
________________
I am human; nothing in humanity is alien to me.
Terence
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Mark K. Bilbo" |
|
| Title: Re: PSA: June 4th is Marriage Protection Sunday |
28 May 2006 06:57:20 AM |
|
|
Previously, on alt.atheism, bibon in episode
<c3th72dije0f1sf4dpk9t5ela6nfj15hlb@4ax.com>...
On Sat, 27 May 2006 12:18:13 -0700, wrote:
On Sat, 27 May 2006 18:17:57 GMT, <bibon@râlant.org> wrote:
On Sat, 27 May 2006 05:25:28 -0500, "Mark K. Bilbo"
<alt-atheism@org.webmaster> wrote:
No he showed you *per *capita AIDS cases. You can't have an "AIDS death
rate" without AIDS cases. And if the per capita number of cases is
low--which it is--but the per capita population of gays is high--as you
claimed--that means Mass. is doing even better than the already low per
capita case numbers indicate.
When you get on the right page,
Ah that's where the problem comes from. Your singing from the hymnal,
while the rest of the people in the discussion are t-h-i-n-k-i-n-g.
*****-WIT, get back in the discussion.
Silly boy.
http://www.avert.org/usastats.htm
The Massachusetts rate is 8.8/100,000
Mississippi's is 16.5.
Texas is 14.7., Georgia 18.6.
The national average is 14.9
Do you want to take another try and make up some BS that is almost
believable?
You're still totally FUCKD UP. The numbers have nothing to do with the per
capita rate of AIDS cases among homosexuals. You must enjoy being a
*****-wit, and showing it publicly.
Yet you can't cite anything to back up your claim. Not to mention, that's
not what you wrote. What you wrote was:
And because of it's excessive per capita homosexual count it is said to
have an extraordinarily high AIDS death rate.
If, as you claim, Mass. has a high "per capita homosexual count" [sic],
then the fact that they have a *low per capita of AIDS cases mean they
have above average healthy gays with a below average rate of AIDS. Per
capita.
With a low per capita of AIDS cases, you'd have to have a low "per capita
homosexual count" [sic] to yield a higher rate of AIDS cases among the
Mass. gay population. But since you say the have a larger than average gay
population *and statistics show they have lower than average per capita
AIDS cases, that yields them having a healthier than average gay community.
Look up "hoist by your own petard" someday...
--
Mark K. Bilbo
--------------------------------------------------
"As hip as it is for outsiders to blame New Orleans
for everything bad that happened during and after
Hurricane Katrina, the truth is that the people
who lived here were much more prepared for a big
storm than the federal government that promised
us flood protection." [Jarvis DeBerry]
http://makeashorterlink.com/?V180525DC
"Everything New Orleans"
http://www.nola.com
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: PSA: June 4th is Marriage Protection Sunday |
28 May 2006 10:16:18 AM |
|
|
On Sun, 28 May 2006 06:57:20 -0500, "Mark K. Bilbo"
<alt-atheism@org.webmaster> wrote:
With a low per capita of AIDS cases, you'd have to have a low "per capita
homosexual count" [sic] to yield a higher rate of AIDS cases among the
Mass. gay population.
Or better education and health care, or lower population
concentrations. There are lots of other possibilities.
________________
I am human; nothing in humanity is alien to me.
Terence
.
|
|
|
| User: "james g. keegan jr." |
|
| Title: Re: PSA: June 4th is Marriage Protection Sunday |
28 May 2006 12:29:41 PM |
|
|
In article <skfj729pmsbv0cnmsm16jasfr63h28s1r8@4ax.com>,
wrote:
Or better education and health care, or lower population
concentrations. There are lots of other possibilities.
better education and health care are contrary to the interests of gop
controlled governments at any level.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Mark K. Bilbo" |
|
| Title: Re: PSA: June 4th is Marriage Protection Sunday |
28 May 2006 11:14:28 AM |
|
|
Previously, on alt.atheism, retrogrouch in episode
<skfj729pmsbv0cnmsm16jasfr63h28s1r8@4ax.com>...
On Sun, 28 May 2006 06:57:20 -0500, "Mark K. Bilbo"
<alt-atheism@org.webmaster> wrote:
With a low per capita of AIDS cases, you'd have to have a low "per capita
homosexual count" [sic] to yield a higher rate of AIDS cases among the
Mass. gay population.
Or better education and health care, or lower population concentrations.
There are lots of other possibilities.
I mean purely from the troll's perspective of a high "homosexual count"
(and how high can a homosexual count?). If the Mass. gay population is
high *but the per capita AIDS cases are low, that really, really screws
with Bitchin' "I'm probably a 45 year old male still delivering pizzas"
Bonny's... um... whatever the hell the he-she is up to...
--
Mark K. Bilbo
--------------------------------------------------
"As hip as it is for outsiders to blame New Orleans
for everything bad that happened during and after
Hurricane Katrina, the truth is that the people
who lived here were much more prepared for a big
storm than the federal government that promised
us flood protection." [Jarvis DeBerry]
http://makeashorterlink.com/?V180525DC
"Everything New Orleans"
http://www.nola.com
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
