| Topic: |
Religions > Atheism |
| User: |
"" |
| Date: |
24 Apr 2006 10:43:19 PM |
| Object: |
Push for national gay-marriage ban |
How much more needs to be done to get the crazed LLL (Looney Liberal
Lemmings) to understand; Americans do not want same-sex marriage. Whatever
arguments can be made in favor of creating this right do not supercede the
fact that Americans overwhelmingly reject the notion. Imposing the will of a
few against the wishes of the masses amounts to no more than totalitarian
government; and afterall, isn't that what you 'liberals' so firmly oppose?
http://www.politicalgateway.com/news/read/9139
WASHINGTON, April 24 (UPI) -- Roman Catholic leaders and evangelical
Protestants, joined by other religious groups, are pushing to amend the U.S.
Constitution to ban same-sex marriage.
As a kickoff, the group signed a petition in support of an amendment, The
New York Times reported. Those who added their names included seven Catholic
cardinals, a number of archbishops, some Orthodox Jewish rabbis and at least
one official of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints.
One Catholic group -- the Knights of Columbus -- plans to distribute 10
million postcards at Catholic churches for congregants to send to their
congressional representatives.
"The personal involvement of bishops and cardinals is significantly greater
this time than in 2004," said Patrick Korten, a spokesman for the lay
Catholic group.
In 2004, proposed amendments to state constitutions on homosexual marriage
helped bring out conservative voters and may have contributed to President
George W. Bush's victory over Sen.. John Kerry.
But some political observers say that the public attitude toward the issue
has shifted with a recent poll finding 51 percent of respondents opposed,
compared to 63 percent in 2004.
--
----------
J Young
youngopinions@aol.com
.
|
|
| User: "Ray Fischer" |
|
| Title: Re: Push for national gay-marriage ban |
25 Apr 2006 10:55:48 AM |
|
|
<youngopinions@aol.com> wrote:
How much more needs to be done to get the crazed LLL (Looney Liberal
Lemmings) to understand; Americans do not want same-sex marriage.
You're losing ground, bigot. People are rejecting your hate.
--
Ray Fischer
rfischer@sonic.net
.
|
|
|
| User: "Bitchin Bonney" |
|
| Title: Re: Push for national gay-marriage ban |
25 Apr 2006 02:00:03 PM |
|
|
On 25 Apr 2006 15:55:48 GMT, (Ray Fischer) wrote:
<youngopinions@aol.com> wrote:
How much more needs to be done to get the crazed LLL (Looney Liberal
Lemmings) to understand; Americans do not want same-sex marriage.
You're losing ground, bigot. People are rejecting your hate.
But they are passing laws quashing the homosexual agenda. That's the
bright side, huh?
.
|
|
|
| User: "goldielocks" |
|
| Title: Re: Push for national gay-marriage ban |
25 Apr 2006 02:20:20 PM |
|
|
But they are passing laws quashing the homosexual agenda. That's the
bright side, huh?
To what purpose? They will only be repealed again when the country
wakes up from the insanity of right-wing fundamentalism?
*/*
.
|
|
|
| User: "Bitchin Bonney" |
|
| Title: Re: Push for national gay-marriage ban |
25 Apr 2006 06:46:26 PM |
|
|
On 25 Apr 2006 12:20:20 -0700, "goldielocks"
<dancing_taoist@yahoo.com> wrote:
But they are passing laws quashing the homosexual agenda. That's the
bright side, huh?
To what purpose? They will only be repealed again when the country
wakes up from the insanity of right-wing fundamentalism?
*/*
<SNIGGER>
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Ray Fischer" |
|
| Title: Re: Push for national gay-marriage ban |
25 Apr 2006 08:42:37 PM |
|
|
Bitchin' Bonney <bibon@râlant.org> wrote:
rfischer@sonic.net (Ray Fischer) wrote:
<youngopinions@aol.com> wrote:
How much more needs to be done to get the crazed LLL (Looney Liberal
Lemmings) to understand; Americans do not want same-sex marriage.
You're losing ground, bigot. People are rejecting your hate.
But they are passing laws quashing the homosexual agenda.
Where? I see laws being passed that uphold the equal rights of all
people. I see laws that persecute gays being abolished. *****, you
can even see TV shows with openly gay characters.
Your bigotry is losing.
--
Ray Fischer
rfischer@sonic.net
.
|
|
|
| User: "Bitchin Bonney" |
|
| Title: Re: Push for national gay-marriage ban |
25 Apr 2006 10:12:49 PM |
|
|
On 26 Apr 2006 01:42:37 GMT, (Ray Fischer) wrote:
Bitchin' Bonney <bibon@râlant.org> wrote:
(Ray Fischer) wrote:
<youngopinions@aol.com> wrote:
How much more needs to be done to get the crazed LLL (Looney Liberal
Lemmings) to understand; Americans do not want same-sex marriage.
You're losing ground, bigot. People are rejecting your hate.
But they are passing laws quashing the homosexual agenda.
Where? I see laws being passed that uphold the equal rights of all
people. I see laws that persecute gays being abolished. *****, you
can even see TV shows with openly gay characters.
Your bigotry is losing.
April 25, 2006
Federal court upholds military's antigay policy
A federal judge with the U.S. district court for the district of
Massachusetts on Monday dismissed a lawsuit filed by 12 service
members challenging the military's antigay "don't ask, don't tell"
policy. The ban, established in 1993 under the Clinton administration,
prohibits the military from asking about the sexual orientation of
service members but requires discharge of those who acknowledge being
gay or engaging in homosexual activity.
The service members had argued that the policy violates their
constitutional rights to privacy, free speech, and equal protection
under the law. However, in court documents the Bush administration
argued that Congress, in approving "don't ask, don't tell," recognized
that the military is characterized by its own rules and traditions,
including some restrictions that would not be accepted in civilian
society.
The policy "rationally furthers the government's interest in
maintaining unit cohesion, reducing sexual tensions, and promoting
personal privacy," the government argued.
U.S. district judge George A. O'Toole Jr. on Monday dismissed the
suit, brought by the Servicemembers Legal Defense Network on behalf of
the 12. "We are disappointed in the court's decision and are reviewing
all possible responses," said C. Dixon Osburn, executive director for
SLDN. "We continue to believe the military's ban is un-American and
unconstitutional. There is no reason lesbian, gay, and bisexual
Americans should be prohibited from serving our country."
"Don't ask, don't tell" has been upheld by appeals courts in several
other jurisdictions. One of the reasons SLDN filed the lawsuit in
Boston is that the appeals court there—the first circuit—has never
been asked to rule in a case involving the policy. (AP, with
additional reporting by The Advocate)
.
|
|
|
| User: "Ray Fischer" |
|
| Title: Re: Push for national gay-marriage ban |
25 Apr 2006 11:24:59 PM |
|
|
Bitchin' Bonney <bibon@râlant.org> wrote:
On 26 Apr 2006 01:42:37 GMT, (Ray Fischer) wrote:
Bitchin' Bonney <bibon@râlant.org> wrote:
(Ray Fischer) wrote:
<youngopinions@aol.com> wrote:
How much more needs to be done to get the crazed LLL (Looney Liberal
Lemmings) to understand; Americans do not want same-sex marriage.
You're losing ground, bigot. People are rejecting your hate.
But they are passing laws quashing the homosexual agenda.
Where? I see laws being passed that uphold the equal rights of all
people. I see laws that persecute gays being abolished. *****, you
can even see TV shows with openly gay characters.
Your bigotry is losing.
April 25, 2006
Federal court upholds military's antigay policy
A federal judge with the U.S. district court for the district of
Who cares? 100 years ago this case wouldn't even have made it to
court. Today its being openly considered by many people. Your fellow
bigots are now in the position of having to justify your bigotry, and
you are losing ground.
--
Ray Fischer
.
|
|
|
| User: "Bitchin Bonney" |
|
| Title: Re: Push for national gay-marriage ban |
26 Apr 2006 10:42:37 AM |
|
|
On 26 Apr 2006 04:24:59 GMT, (Ray Fischer) wrote:
Bitchin' Bonney <bibon@râlant.org> wrote:
On 26 Apr 2006 01:42:37 GMT, (Ray Fischer) wrote:
Bitchin' Bonney <bibon@râlant.org> wrote:
(Ray Fischer) wrote:
<youngopinions@aol.com> wrote:
How much more needs to be done to get the crazed LLL (Looney Liberal
Lemmings) to understand; Americans do not want same-sex marriage.
You're losing ground, bigot. People are rejecting your hate.
But they are passing laws quashing the homosexual agenda.
Where? I see laws being passed that uphold the equal rights of all
people. I see laws that persecute gays being abolished. *****, you
can even see TV shows with openly gay characters.
Your bigotry is losing.
April 25, 2006
Federal court upholds military's antigay policy
A federal judge with the U.S. district court for the district of
Who cares? 100 years ago this case wouldn't even have made it to
court. Today its being openly considered by many people. Your fellow
bigots are now in the position of having to justify your bigotry, and
you are losing ground.
I don't call stomping a mud hole in your opponent's ***** every time he
challenges you, "Losing Ground", boy.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Mark Sebree" |
|
| Title: Re: Push for national gay-marriage ban |
26 Apr 2006 11:33:53 AM |
|
|
Bitchin' Bonney wrote:
On 26 Apr 2006 04:24:59 GMT, (Ray Fischer) wrote:
Bitchin' Bonney <bibon@r=E2lant.org> wrote:
On 26 Apr 2006 01:42:37 GMT, (Ray Fischer) wrote:
Bitchin' Bonney <bibon@r=E2lant.org> wrote:
(Ray Fischer) wrote:
<youngopinions@aol.com> wrote:
How much more needs to be done to get the crazed LLL (Looney Liberal
Lemmings) to understand; Americans do not want same-sex marriage.
You're losing ground, bigot. People are rejecting your hate.
But they are passing laws quashing the homosexual agenda.
Where? I see laws being passed that uphold the equal rights of all
people. I see laws that persecute gays being abolished. *****, you
can even see TV shows with openly gay characters.
Your bigotry is losing.
April 25, 2006
Federal court upholds military's antigay policy
A federal judge with the U.S. district court for the district of
Who cares? 100 years ago this case wouldn't even have made it to
court. Today its being openly considered by many people. Your fellow
bigots are now in the position of having to justify your bigotry, and
you are losing ground.
I don't call stomping a mud hole in your opponent's ***** every time he
challenges you, "Losing Ground", boy.
Then you are most definititely losing ground, since that is what we are
doing to you. "Stomping a mud hole in [your] ***** every time [you]
challenge [us]." It is certainly that you have not been able to
support your hatred and bigotry at all. All you have is your biased
and unintelligent opinions, while we have a mountain of facts and a sea
of compassion and tolerance. And since you have no facts, your
"challenges" fail completely and utterly.
Mark Sebree
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Bonnie B" |
|
| Title: Re: Push for national gay-marriage ban |
26 Apr 2006 10:48:06 AM |
|
|
On Wed, 26 Apr 2006 15:42:37 GMT, the faaaaabulous supreme deity
Tlahuizcalpantecuhtli, Ruler of the heavens and host of fab parties,
opened the heavens and shone his light upon the stupidity of nym thief
BILL TAYLOR <abuse@easynews.com>
I should call getting a mud hole stomped in my ***** every time I
post "Losing Ground", and I like "boys."
.
|
|
|
| User: "Bitchin Bonney" |
|
| Title: Re: Push for national gay-marriage ban |
26 Apr 2006 08:23:32 PM |
|
|
On Wed, 26 Apr 2006 08:48:06 -0700, Bonnie B <bonnieb@fifismaxi.pad>
wrote:
I like "boys" AND "girls."
.
|
|
|
| User: "Bonnie B" |
|
| Title: Re: Push for national gay-marriage ban |
26 Apr 2006 09:57:40 PM |
|
|
On Thu, 27 Apr 2006 01:23:32 GMT, the faaaaabulous supreme deity
Tlahuizcalpantecuhtli, Ruler of the heavens and host of fab parties,
opened the heavens and shone his light upon the stupidity of nym thief
BILL TAYLOR <abuse@easynews.com>
I like "boys"
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "No One" |
|
| Title: Re: Push for national gay-marriage ban |
24 Apr 2006 11:00:38 PM |
|
|
<youngopinions@aol.com> writes:
How much more needs to be done to get the crazed LLL (Looney Liberal
Lemmings) to understand; Americans do not want same-sex marriage. Whatever
arguments can be made in favor of creating this right do not supercede the
fact that Americans overwhelmingly reject the notion. Imposing the will of a
few against the wishes of the masses amounts to no more than totalitarian
government; and afterall, isn't that what you 'liberals' so firmly oppose?
The latest polls show that in California same-sex marriage has about 50/50
support - the numbers have shifted substantially since Proposition 22 was
passed. That we were at the break even point was even mentioned in a
letter to the editor by a spokescritter for the San Francisco branch of
the Republican Party (and his letter was intended to support Arnold when
he vetoed a bill allowing same-sex marriages). He tried to spin it by
saying that it should be decided by another initiative (which, of course,
is very expensive to do).
http://www.politicalgateway.com/news/read/9139
WASHINGTON, April 24 (UPI) -- Roman Catholic leaders and evangelical
Protestants, joined by other religious groups, are pushing to amend the U.S.
Constitution to ban same-sex marriage.
I'd say it is time to do something about the Loony Religious Right Wing
and we can start by eliminating the tax-exempt status these religious
groups get. If they want to ammend the U.S. Constitution, they can
pay for their lobbying out of after-tax dollars like everyone else.
Sure the Catholics and Evangelicals will scream about losing their
boon, but if they want to alter our system of government, that's just
too bad.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Fooj" |
|
| Title: Re: Push for national gay-marriage ban |
24 Apr 2006 11:51:20 PM |
|
|
No One wrote:
The latest polls show that in California same-sex marriage has about 50/50
support - the numbers have shifted substantially since Proposition 22 was
passed. That we were at the break even point was even mentioned in a
letter to the editor by a spokescritter for the San Francisco branch of
the Republican Party (and his letter was intended to support Arnold when
he vetoed a bill allowing same-sex marriages). He tried to spin it by
saying that it should be decided by another initiative (which, of course,
is very expensive to do).
Alot of homos don't care about same-sex marriage. What makes you think
you have an accurate poll given this fact?
*snip old news*
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Matty" |
|
| Title: Re: Push for national gay-marriage ban |
25 Apr 2006 03:58:16 AM |
|
|
wrote:
How much more needs to be done to get the crazed LLL (Looney Liberal
Lemmings) to understand; Americans do not want same-sex marriage. Whatever
arguments can be made in favor of creating this right do not supercede the
fact that Americans overwhelmingly reject the notion. Imposing the will of
a few against the wishes of the masses amounts to no more than
totalitarian government; and afterall, isn't that what you 'liberals' so
firmly oppose?
http://www.politicalgateway.com/news/read/9139
Interesting how all those countries that have either same sex marriage or
recognise same sex unions don't seem to be ladened with the same social
problems that the US has.
Matty
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Push for national gay-marriage ban |
29 Apr 2006 10:49:23 PM |
|
|
wrote:
How much more needs to be done to get the crazed LLL (Looney Liberal
Lemmings) to understand; Americans do not want same-sex marriage. Whatever
arguments can be made in favor of creating this right do not supercede the
fact that Americans overwhelmingly reject the notion. Imposing the will of a
few against the wishes of the masses amounts to no more than totalitarian
government; and afterall, isn't that what you 'liberals' so firmly oppose?
http://www.politicalgateway.com/news/read/9139
WASHINGTON, April 24 (UPI) -- Roman Catholic leaders and evangelical
Protestants, joined by other religious groups, are pushing to amend the U.S.
Constitution to ban same-sex marriage.
As a kickoff, the group signed a petition in support of an amendment, The
New York Times reported. Those who added their names included seven Catholic
cardinals, a number of archbishops, some Orthodox Jewish rabbis and at least
one official of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints.
One Catholic group -- the Knights of Columbus -- plans to distribute 10
million postcards at Catholic churches for congregants to send to their
congressional representatives.
"The personal involvement of bishops and cardinals is significantly greater
this time than in 2004," said Patrick Korten, a spokesman for the lay
Catholic group.
In 2004, proposed amendments to state constitutions on homosexual marriage
helped bring out conservative voters and may have contributed to President
George W. Bush's victory over Sen.. John Kerry.
But some political observers say that the public attitude toward the issue
has shifted with a recent poll finding 51 percent of respondents opposed,
compared to 63 percent in 2004.
--
----------
J Young
It should be an *international* ban.
.
|
|
|
| User: "DanielSan" |
|
| Title: Re: Push for national gay-marriage ban |
29 Apr 2006 11:12:12 PM |
|
|
wrote:
youngopinions@aol.com wrote:
How much more needs to be done to get the crazed LLL (Looney Liberal
Lemmings) to understand; Americans do not want same-sex marriage. Whatever
arguments can be made in favor of creating this right do not supercede the
fact that Americans overwhelmingly reject the notion. Imposing the will of a
few against the wishes of the masses amounts to no more than totalitarian
government; and afterall, isn't that what you 'liberals' so firmly oppose?
http://www.politicalgateway.com/news/read/9139
WASHINGTON, April 24 (UPI) -- Roman Catholic leaders and evangelical
Protestants, joined by other religious groups, are pushing to amend the U.S.
Constitution to ban same-sex marriage.
As a kickoff, the group signed a petition in support of an amendment, The
New York Times reported. Those who added their names included seven Catholic
cardinals, a number of archbishops, some Orthodox Jewish rabbis and at least
one official of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints.
One Catholic group -- the Knights of Columbus -- plans to distribute 10
million postcards at Catholic churches for congregants to send to their
congressional representatives.
"The personal involvement of bishops and cardinals is significantly greater
this time than in 2004," said Patrick Korten, a spokesman for the lay
Catholic group.
In 2004, proposed amendments to state constitutions on homosexual marriage
helped bring out conservative voters and may have contributed to President
George W. Bush's victory over Sen.. John Kerry.
But some political observers say that the public attitude toward the issue
has shifted with a recent poll finding 51 percent of respondents opposed,
compared to 63 percent in 2004.
--
----------
J Young
youngopinions@aol.com
It should be an *international* ban.
Yeah. You can't even get a majority of the states to agree on a ban.
How do you expect an international ban to work?
--
*****************************************************
* DanielSan -- alt.atheism #2226 *
*---------------------------------------------------*
* "You can safely assume that you've created God in *
* your own image when it turns out that God hates *
* all the same people you do." --Anne Lamott *
*****************************************************
--
.
|
|
|
| User: "ZenIsWhen" |
|
| Title: Re: Push for national gay-marriage ban |
30 Apr 2006 01:34:23 AM |
|
|
"DanielSan" <daniel-san@myrealbox.com> wrote in message
news:4454392e$0$23887$6d36acad@taz.nntpserver.com...
vivapadrepio@aol.com wrote:
youngopinions@aol.com wrote:
How much more needs to be done to get the crazed LLL (Looney Liberal
Lemmings) to understand; Americans do not want same-sex marriage.
Whatever
arguments can be made in favor of creating this right do not supercede
the
fact that Americans overwhelmingly reject the notion. Imposing the will
of a
few against the wishes of the masses amounts to no more than totalitarian
government; and afterall, isn't that what you 'liberals' so firmly
oppose?
Christian fundamentalists don't want same sex marriages, and, as usual, they
are trying to shove their fanatical religious beliefs down everyone else's
throat.
Your concept of democracy it TOTALLY corrupted by your insane religious
delusions.
In THIS democracy the "majority" does NOT have the right to SUPPRESS the
minority!
Besides - unless YOU are gay, allowing gay marriages will not affect YOU one
bit!!!!!
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Push for national gay-marriage ban |
30 Apr 2006 05:55:37 AM |
|
|
SAME TYPE OF CHRISTIANS WHO WERE FOR THE SEGRAGATION OF BLACK AMERICANS
ARE NOW GOING AFTER GAY AMERICANS. EVIL IS EVIL.
.
|
|
|
| User: "John P" |
|
| Title: Re: Push for national gay-marriage ban |
01 May 2006 01:34:15 AM |
|
|
wrote:
SAME TYPE OF CHRISTIANS WHO WERE FOR THE SEGRAGATION OF BLACK AMERICANS
ARE NOW GOING AFTER GAY AMERICANS. EVIL IS EVIL.
In fifty years when the rest of the wold accepts has long accepted
gays, mormons will change their feelings toward gays and say that it
was never against the religion that it was only the opinions of the
prophets that discriminated against gays.
--
The believer is not at liberty to have a conscience for the question
"true" and "untrue": to be upright on this point would mean his
immediate downfall. --Nietzsche
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Push for national gay-marriage ban |
03 May 2006 10:10:31 PM |
|
|
John P wrote:
ck19bla@msn.com wrote:
SAME TYPE OF CHRISTIANS WHO WERE FOR THE SEGRAGATION OF BLACK AMERICANS
ARE NOW GOING AFTER GAY AMERICANS. EVIL IS EVIL.
In fifty years when the rest of the wold accepts has long accepted
gays, mormons will change their feelings toward gays and say that it
was never against the religion that it was only the opinions of the
prophets that discriminated against gays.
Fifty years from now? Boy, are *you ever the optimist. :-)
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Push for national gay-marriage ban |
30 Apr 2006 04:50:30 PM |
|
|
DanielSan wrote:
vivapadrepio@aol.com wrote:
youngopinions@aol.com wrote:
How much more needs to be done to get the crazed LLL (Looney Liberal
Lemmings) to understand; Americans do not want same-sex marriage. Whatever
arguments can be made in favor of creating this right do not supercede the
fact that Americans overwhelmingly reject the notion. Imposing the will of a
few against the wishes of the masses amounts to no more than totalitarian
government; and afterall, isn't that what you 'liberals' so firmly oppose?
http://www.politicalgateway.com/news/read/9139
WASHINGTON, April 24 (UPI) -- Roman Catholic leaders and evangelical
Protestants, joined by other religious groups, are pushing to amend the U.S.
Constitution to ban same-sex marriage.
As a kickoff, the group signed a petition in support of an amendment, The
New York Times reported. Those who added their names included seven Catholic
cardinals, a number of archbishops, some Orthodox Jewish rabbis and at least
one official of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints.
One Catholic group -- the Knights of Columbus -- plans to distribute 10
million postcards at Catholic churches for congregants to send to their
congressional representatives.
"The personal involvement of bishops and cardinals is significantly greater
this time than in 2004," said Patrick Korten, a spokesman for the lay
Catholic group.
In 2004, proposed amendments to state constitutions on homosexual marriage
helped bring out conservative voters and may have contributed to President
George W. Bush's victory over Sen.. John Kerry.
But some political observers say that the public attitude toward the issue
has shifted with a recent poll finding 51 percent of respondents opposed,
compared to 63 percent in 2004.
--
----------
J Young
youngopinions@aol.com
It should be an *international* ban.
Yeah. You can't even get a majority of the states to agree on a ban.
How do you expect an international ban to work?
--
*****************************************************
* DanielSan -- alt.atheism #2226 *
*---------------------------------------------------*
I'm just relaying God's instruction. If man does not obey, and he
doesn't for the most part, then let the punishment fit the crime.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Mark K. Bilbo" |
|
| Title: Re: Push for national gay-marriage ban |
01 May 2006 09:55:06 AM |
|
|
Previously, on alt.atheism, in episode
<1146433830.608156.41300@i40g2000cwc.googlegroups.com>...
I'm just relaying God's instruction.
Says you.
You, um, "hear" this god giving instructions often? Does this god ever try
to make you do things you don't want to do?
--
Mark K. Bilbo
--------------------------------------------------
"Corps chief admits to 'design failure'"
(Took them long enough)
http://makeashorterlink.com/?J3EF62DEC
"As hip as it is for outsiders to blame New Orleans
for everything bad that happened during and after
Hurricane Katrina, the truth is that the people
who lived here were much more prepared for a big
storm than the federal government that promised
us flood protection."
http://makeashorterlink.com/?V180525DC
"Everything New Orleans"
http://www.nola.com
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Mark K. Bilbo" |
|
| Title: Re: Push for national gay-marriage ban |
30 Apr 2006 08:27:26 AM |
|
|
Previously, on alt.atheism, in episode
<1146368963.472439.203120@i40g2000cwc.googlegroups.com>...
It should be an *international* ban.
You and bin Laden...
--
Mark K. Bilbo
--------------------------------------------------
"Corps chief admits to 'design failure'"
(Took them long enough)
http://makeashorterlink.com/?J3EF62DEC
"As hip as it is for outsiders to blame New Orleans
for everything bad that happened during and after
Hurricane Katrina, the truth is that the people
who lived here were much more prepared for a big
storm than the federal government that promised
us flood protection."
http://makeashorterlink.com/?V180525DC
"Everything New Orleans"
http://www.nola.com
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "SheBlewHimDidYouBlowHim" |
|
| Title: Re: Push for national gay-marriage ban |
02 May 2006 08:59:45 PM |
|
|
if you push for a national gay marriage ban, then presidunce bush won't be
able to marry his one boyfriend gannon or his other boyfriend the saudi
prince.
.
|
|
|
| User: "John Manning" |
|
| Title: Re: Push for national gay-marriage ban |
02 May 2006 09:09:08 PM |
|
|
SheBlewHimDidYouBlowHim wrote:
if you push for a national gay marriage ban, then presidunce bush won't be
able to marry his one boyfriend gannon or his other boyfriend the saudi
prince.
Former Sen. John Danforth (R-MO), on the conservative plan to amend the
Constitution to ban gay marriage:
“Some historian should really look at all of the proposals that have
been forth throughout the history of our country for possible
constitutional amendments. Maybe at some point in time there was one
that was sillier than this one, but I don't know of one.“
http://uk.gay.com/headlines/9894
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Conspiracy of Doves" |
|
| Title: Re: Push for national gay-marriage ban |
24 Apr 2006 11:41:42 PM |
|
|
wrote:
How much more needs to be done to get the crazed LLL (Looney Liberal
Lemmings) to understand; Americans do not want same-sex marriage. Whatever
arguments can be made in favor of creating this right do not supercede the
fact that Americans overwhelmingly reject the notion. Imposing the will of a
few against the wishes of the masses amounts to no more than totalitarian
government; and afterall, isn't that what you 'liberals' so firmly oppose?
http://www.politicalgateway.com/news/read/9139
WASHINGTON, April 24 (UPI) -- Roman Catholic leaders and evangelical
Protestants, joined by other religious groups, are pushing to amend the U.S.
Constitution to ban same-sex marriage.
As a kickoff, the group signed a petition in support of an amendment, The
New York Times reported. Those who added their names included seven Catholic
cardinals, a number of archbishops, some Orthodox Jewish rabbis and at least
one official of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints.
One Catholic group -- the Knights of Columbus -- plans to distribute 10
million postcards at Catholic churches for congregants to send to their
congressional representatives.
"The personal involvement of bishops and cardinals is significantly greater
this time than in 2004," said Patrick Korten, a spokesman for the lay
Catholic group.
In 2004, proposed amendments to state constitutions on homosexual marriage
helped bring out conservative voters and may have contributed to President
George W. Bush's victory over Sen.. John Kerry.
But some political observers say that the public attitude toward the issue
has shifted with a recent poll finding 51 percent of respondents opposed,
compared to 63 percent in 2004.
Please explain what business it is of yours, or any other heterosexual,
if homosexuals want to get married.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Fooj" |
|
| Title: Re: Push for national gay-marriage ban |
24 Apr 2006 11:52:55 PM |
|
|
Conspiracy of Doves wrote:
Please explain what business it is of yours, or any other heterosexual,
if homosexuals want to get married.
Why is same-sex marriage even necessary?
.
|
|
|
| User: "The Chief Instigator" |
|
| Title: Re: Push for national gay-marriage ban |
25 Apr 2006 12:21:59 AM |
|
|
"Fooj" <deanlangenfeld@hotmail.com> writes:
Conspiracy of Doves wrote:
Please explain what business it is of yours, or any other heterosexual,
if homosexuals want to get married.
Why is same-sex marriage even necessary?
Why is marriage even necessary?
--
Patrick "The Chief Instigator" Humphrey (patrick@io.com) Houston, Texas
chiefinstigator.us.tt/aeros.php (TCI's 2005-06 Houston Aeros)
LAST GAME: Houston 6, Peoria 1 (April 24)
NEXT GAME: Wednesday, April 26 at Peoria, 7:05 (Game 4)
.
|
|
|
| User: "Jeff White" |
|
| Title: Re: Push for national gay-marriage ban |
25 Apr 2006 03:41:10 AM |
|
|
"The Chief Instigator" <patrick@io.com> wrote in message
news:szk1wvmjklk.fsf@fnord.io.com...
"Fooj" <deanlangenfeld@hotmail.com> writes:
Conspiracy of Doves wrote:
Please explain what business it is of yours, or any other heterosexual,
if homosexuals want to get married.
Why is same-sex marriage even necessary?
Why is marriage even necessary?
because histrionic little girls need to wear white dresses and parade around
like queens for their mindless little families.
marriage is an institution that needs to die, but for that to happen, men
need to grow balls.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
