"The Church of The Painful Truth" <Nospam@Nomarketing.com> wrote in message
news:B7z%b.2701$B84.80368@news.uswest.net...
"bob young" <alaspectrum@netvigator.com> wrote in message
news:403D91DB.989D503A@netvigator.com...
The Church of The Painful Truth wrote:
"bob young" <alaspectrum@netvigator.com> wrote in message
news:403C4332.284CCD29@netvigator.com...
Viceroy Fizzlebottom wrote:
The Church of The Painful Truth wrote:
All of this child molestation being discovered in the church has
been
going
on for a long time for instance.+
Why is it that this god-thing needs to work through humans to get
his/her/it's message across? Why not just open the sky and say
"here
I
am!"
These perpetrators may represent Christianity
but their punishment will be 100x that of anyone else make no
mistake
about
it.
Interesting that this god-thing would so gladly punish someone for
being
the human that he supposedly made and gave free-will to...AND
knows
the
future of.
They are human and therefore have faults,some more than others.
I have 100x times the contempt for these people than I do the
atheists.
I am guessing that God does as well.+
Yes, it's all guess work with your god.
The god-thing supposedly knows all things right? Would he not know
that
these people would do bad things? Why allow that? Why punish that?
If I
know that my kid is going to do something bad today, I'll stop him
from
doing it instead of taking pleasure in punishing him for it after
the
fact....
...aaaaaah but the 'god thing' is only imaginary
--
Eric W.
Colorado Springs, CO
A.A.#2174
Me: http://www.egwilliams.net
DX: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/COS_DXers
SP: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/COS_Single_Parents/
Logical positivism is based upon the verification principle, which
states
that for a statement to be meaningful, it has to be either true by
definition or verifiable by one or more of the five senses. This means
that
all discussion about God should be considered meaningless. However,
the
verification principle itself fails its own test, since it cannot be
verified by any of the five senses. It is a self-refuting principle,
and,
therefore, logically flawed.
So, let me get this right. Your god cannot be proved and because proof
positive cannot be provided to show that he does *not* exist [like
pixies
and
lepracauns] then your god does exist?
Let me know if you ever design and buld an aeroplane - I'll make sure I
never
fly on it!
Painful: +So, let me get this right. You cannot prove there is no GOD
because >proof positive cannot be provided to show that he does *not* exist
?+
Now with that being said I would like to start this session of fools and
INtellectually blind persons Anonomous. I am your advisor, and I am here
to
help you with accepting your problems. Now, feel free to stand in front of
the group and admit your problem
Tom: Oh, so you can prove that god does exist?
.
