Question for Duke



 Religions > Atheism > Question for Duke

LINK TO THIS PAGE  


rating :  0   |  0


  Page 1 of 1

1

 
Topic: Religions > Atheism
User: "George Wright"
Date: 25 Jan 2005 01:39:32 AM
Object: Question for Duke
Duke, in several of your posts, you apply the designation "junior atheist"
to other posters. I assume that's your characterization.
What do you mean this to convey? Do you distinguish between junior atheists
and others? if so, how?
Geo
.

User: "duke"

Title: Re: Question for Duke 25 Jan 2005 11:53:08 PM
On Mon, 24 Jan 2005 20:39:32 -0500, "George Wright" <geo@loyola.edu> wrote:

Duke, in several of your posts, you apply the designation "junior atheist"
to other posters. I assume that's your characterization.

What do you mean this to convey? Do you distinguish between junior atheists
and others? if so, how?

Geo

So many of the correspondents on this ng are no more than high school harries.
They can best be singled out by the shear immaturity and lack of substance of
their comments.
duke
*****
Matthew 22
14"For many are invited, but few are chosen."
*****
.
User: "Douglas Berry"

Title: Re: Question for Duke 26 Jan 2005 12:34:30 AM
On Tue, 25 Jan 2005 17:53:08 -0600, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> drained
his beer, leaned back in the alt.atheism beanbag and drunkenly
proclaimed the following

On Mon, 24 Jan 2005 20:39:32 -0500, "George Wright" <geo@loyola.edu> wrote:

Duke, in several of your posts, you apply the designation "junior atheist"
to other posters. I assume that's your characterization.

What do you mean this to convey? Do you distinguish between junior atheists
and others? if so, how?

Geo


So many of the correspondents on this ng are no more than high school harries.
They can best be singled out by the shear immaturity and lack of substance of
their comments.

Specifics? You've called me a "junior atheist" before, and I'm a 38
year okld combat veteran.
--
Douglas E. Berry Do the OBVIOUS thing to send e-mail
Atheist #2147, Atheist Vet #5
"Men never do evil so completely and cheerfully as
when they do it from religious conviction."
Blaise Pascal (1623-1662), Pense'es, #894.
.
User: "duke"

Title: Re: Question for Duke 26 Jan 2005 11:35:21 PM
On Wed, 26 Jan 2005 00:34:30 GMT, Douglas Berry
<penguin_boy@mindOBVIOUSspring.com> wrote:

So many of the correspondents on this ng are no more than high school harries.
They can best be singled out by the shear immaturity and lack of substance of
their comments.

Specifics? You've called me a "junior atheist" before, and I'm a 38
year okld combat veteran.

It's all revealed in the maturity demonstrated in words, thoughts, and
presentation.
Yang is a good example. He's supposedly a 30 year old PhD. My guess is that
his oriental background and life style kept him out of the general social
circles and exposure to the collegiate life style. As a consequence, he is
basically incapable of adult conversation as he has so often demonstrated and is
thus reduced to personal attack only. It speaks for itself. Yang speaks for
himself.
duke
*****
Matthew 22
14"For many are invited, but few are chosen."
*****
.
User: "Les Hellawell"

Title: Re: Question for Duke 27 Jan 2005 10:31:06 AM
On Wed, 26 Jan 2005 17:35:21 -0600, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote:

On Wed, 26 Jan 2005 00:34:30 GMT, Douglas Berry
<penguin_boy@mindOBVIOUSspring.com> wrote:

So many of the correspondents on this ng are no more than high school harries.
They can best be singled out by the shear immaturity and lack of substance of
their comments.


Specifics? You've called me a "junior atheist" before, and I'm a 38
year okld combat veteran.


It's all revealed in the maturity demonstrated in words, thoughts, and
presentation.

Oh well, if that is the standards you apply that makes you a fetus
theist
--
Les Hellawell
greetings from
YORKSHIRE - The White Rose County
.
User: "duke"

Title: Re: Question for Duke 28 Jan 2005 11:11:10 AM
On Thu, 27 Jan 2005 10:31:06 +0000, Les Hellawell
<myshredder@leswell.freeuk.com> wrote:

On Wed, 26 Jan 2005 17:35:21 -0600, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote:

On Wed, 26 Jan 2005 00:34:30 GMT, Douglas Berry
<penguin_boy@mindOBVIOUSspring.com> wrote:

So many of the correspondents on this ng are no more than high school harries.
They can best be singled out by the shear immaturity and lack of substance of
their comments.


Specifics? You've called me a "junior atheist" before, and I'm a 38
year okld combat veteran.


It's all revealed in the maturity demonstrated in words, thoughts, and
presentation.


Oh well, if that is the standards you apply that makes you a fetus
theist

A human fetus is human life and grows to human maturity - from conception to
death - a human being. It's doesn't become a dog.
duke
*****
Matthew 22
14"For many are invited, but few are chosen."
*****
.






  Page 1 of 1

1

 


Related Articles
Question for duke: Why does god hate amputees?
Question for Duke (and other religious people)
Question about holocause
Theological question...
Question: Terminal shock and the speed of light
Question for people in this group
Re: Question for Nellie
A Question About Christians Claiming Historical and Archaeological Evidence.
Re: Serious question for liberal atheists
God is not at the centre of everything, therefore, his existence is the least important question about him.
--- Wrong question.
OT: A Question for Christians and Students of Christianity (Not a Challenge)
Question about the 2nd law and the origins of order
Re: I want to ask you the most important question of your life. The question is: Are you saved? It is not a question of how good you are, nor if you are a church member, but are you saved? Are you sure you will go to Heaven when you die? The reason s
Pedophiles question science
 

NEWER

pg.3585     pg.2749     pg.2106     pg.1612     pg.1232     pg.940     pg.716     pg.544     pg.412     pg.311     pg.234     pg.175     pg.130     pg.96     pg.70     pg.50     pg.35     pg.24     pg.16     pg.10     pg.6     pg.3     pg.1

OLDER