| Topic: |
Religions > Atheism |
| User: |
"Bill M" |
| Date: |
20 Jan 2007 10:53:59 AM |
| Object: |
QUESTIONS FOR THEISTS |
Some questions for theists.
1.. Why do billions of honest non-delusional people never see or hear from
their God?
2.. If there is a real God, why does he permit the majority of his
creations to be deceived by hundreds of false Gods?
3.. If there is a loving God creator, why did he create such a brutal and
defective world with birth defects, wars and diseases?
4.. If a Devil has created all the defects and punishments of the real
world, why does a loving God permit this mistreatment of his creations?
5.. Who, why and what created Devils that enjoy misleading and punishing
God creations???
.
|
|
| User: "Pastor Frank" |
|
| Title: Re: QUESTIONS FOR THEISTS |
21 Jan 2007 08:27:26 AM |
|
|
"Bill M" <wmech@bellsouth.net> wrote in message
news:zOrsh.246$jA.126@bignews1.bellsouth.net...
Some questions for theists.
1.. Why do billions of honest non-delusional people never see or hear
from their God?
2.. If there is a real God, why does he permit the majority of his
creations to be deceived by hundreds of false Gods?
3.. If there is a loving God creator, why did he create such a brutal and
defective world with birth defects, wars and diseases?
4.. If a Devil has created all the defects and punishments of the real
world, why does a loving God permit this mistreatment of his creations?
5.. Who, why and what created Devils that enjoy misleading and punishing
God creations???
We did hear from God, who came personally in the flesh of Jesus Christ,
and we promptly nailed Him to a cross. Atheists are just awaiting for Him to
come again, so they can kill Him all over again.
--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
.
|
|
|
| User: "Bill M" |
|
| Title: Re: QUESTIONS FOR THEISTS |
21 Jan 2007 05:19:04 PM |
|
|
"Pastor Frank" <PF@christfirst.edu> wrote in message
news:45b3be58$0$24421$88260bb3@free.teranews.com...
"Bill M" <wmech@bellsouth.net> wrote in message
news:zOrsh.246$jA.126@bignews1.bellsouth.net...
Some questions for theists.
1.. Why do billions of honest non-delusional people never see or hear
from their God?
2.. If there is a real God, why does he permit the majority of his
creations to be deceived by hundreds of false Gods?
3.. If there is a loving God creator, why did he create such a brutal
and defective world with birth defects, wars and diseases?
4.. If a Devil has created all the defects and punishments of the real
world, why does a loving God permit this mistreatment of his creations?
5.. Who, why and what created Devils that enjoy misleading and punishing
God creations???
We did hear from God, who came personally in the flesh of Jesus Christ,
and we promptly nailed Him to a cross. Atheists are just awaiting for Him
to come again, so they can kill Him all over again.
Only in your "delusional opinion"!
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Steve O" |
|
| Title: Re: QUESTIONS FOR THEISTS |
21 Jan 2007 03:53:09 PM |
|
|
"Pastor Frank" <PF@christfirst.edu> wrote in message
news:45b3be58$0$24421$88260bb3@free.teranews.com...
"Bill M" <wmech@bellsouth.net> wrote in message
news:zOrsh.246$jA.126@bignews1.bellsouth.net...
Some questions for theists.
1.. Why do billions of honest non-delusional people never see or hear
from their God?
2.. If there is a real God, why does he permit the majority of his
creations to be deceived by hundreds of false Gods?
3.. If there is a loving God creator, why did he create such a brutal
and defective world with birth defects, wars and diseases?
4.. If a Devil has created all the defects and punishments of the real
world, why does a loving God permit this mistreatment of his creations?
5.. Who, why and what created Devils that enjoy misleading and punishing
God creations???
We did hear from God, who came personally in the flesh of Jesus Christ,
and we promptly nailed Him to a cross. Atheists are just awaiting for Him
to come again, so they can kill Him all over again.
Oh purleeeeeze get a clue, will ya?
--
Steve O
a.a. #2240 (Apatheist Chapter)
B.A.A.W.A.
"Faith doesn't move mountains - it levels buildings"
"The Universe isn't about us." - Carl Sagan
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Richo" |
|
| Title: Re: QUESTIONS FOR THEISTS |
21 Jan 2007 08:52:25 PM |
|
|
Pastor Frank wrote:
"Bill M" <wmech@bellsouth.net> wrote in message
news:zOrsh.246$jA.126@bignews1.bellsouth.net...
Some questions for theists.
1.. Why do billions of honest non-delusional people never see or hear
from their God?
2.. If there is a real God, why does he permit the majority of his
creations to be deceived by hundreds of false Gods?
3.. If there is a loving God creator, why did he create such a brutal and
defective world with birth defects, wars and diseases?
4.. If a Devil has created all the defects and punishments of the real
world, why does a loving God permit this mistreatment of his creations?
5.. Who, why and what created Devils that enjoy misleading and punishing
God creations???
We did hear from God, who came personally in the flesh of Jesus Christ,
and we promptly nailed Him to a cross. Atheists are just awaiting for Him to
come again, so they can kill Him all over again.
Theists killed Jesus (if he existed) - He was a Jew, he was executed
by Romans who had many gods at the urging of Jews with their "One True
God".
If some chap tells me he is God or the son of God it doenst bother me
too much - blaspheme isnt a crime if you are an atheist - it's a non
event.
Mark.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "misanthropic_curmudgeon" |
|
| Title: Re: QUESTIONS FOR THEISTS |
22 Jan 2007 05:53:17 PM |
|
|
Pastor Frank wrote:
We did hear from God, who came personally in the flesh of Jesus Christ,
and we promptly nailed Him to a cross. Atheists are just awaiting for Him to
come again, so they can kill Him all over again.
I feel sorry for your flock, Pastor Frank, if that is the level of
'teaching' and 'guidance' you offer.
An athiest who was waiting for Jesus[TM] would not be an athiest,
because an athiest does not beleive Jesus[TM] existed/exists.
By very definition, anybody waiting for Jesus[TM] can not be an athiest.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Pastor Frank" |
|
| Title: Re: QUESTIONS FOR THEISTS |
23 Jan 2007 10:53:21 PM |
|
|
"misanthropic_curmudgeon" <misanthropiccurmudgeon@breastcancermail.com>
wrote in message
news:1169509997.568616.99250@a75g2000cwd.googlegroups.com...
Pastor Frank wrote:
We did hear from God, who came personally in the flesh of Jesus Christ,
and we promptly nailed Him to a cross. Atheists are just awaiting for Him
to
come again, so they can kill Him all over again.
I feel sorry for your flock, Pastor Frank, if that is the level of
'teaching' and 'guidance' you offer.
I feel sorry for your mental state, if that's all the logic you can come
up with.
An athiest who was waiting for Jesus[TM] would not be an athiest,
because an athiest does not beleive Jesus[TM] existed/exists.
By very definition, anybody waiting for Jesus[TM] can not be an athiest.
Hogwash. An atheists is not one who disbelieves the existence of Jesus
Christ, but one who doesn't believe in god(s), as in 'give credence to
god(s)', regardless of whether they exist or not.
--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
.
|
|
|
| User: "aversiveness" |
|
| Title: Re: QUESTIONS FOR THEISTS |
25 Jan 2007 03:38:57 PM |
|
|
On Jan 23, 11:53 pm, "Pastor Frank" <P...@christfirst.edu> wrote:
"misanthropic_curmudgeon" <misanthropiccurmudg...@breastcancermail.com>
wrote in messagenews:1169509997.568616.99250@a75g2000cwd.googlegroups.com...> Pastor Frank wrote:
We did hear from God, who came personally in the flesh of Jesus Christ,
and we promptly nailed Him to a cross. Atheists are just awaiting for Him
to
come again, so they can kill Him all over again.
I feel sorry for your flock, Pastor Frank, if that is the level of
'teaching' and 'guidance' you offer.
I feel sorry for your mental state, if that's all the logic you can come
up with.
An athiest who was waiting for Jesus[TM] would not be an athiest,
because an athiest does not beleive Jesus[TM] existed/exists.
By very definition, anybody waiting for Jesus[TM] can not be an athiest.
Hogwash. An atheists is not one who disbelieves the existence of Jesus
Christ, but one who doesn't believe in god(s), as in 'give credence to
god(s)', regardless of whether they exist or not.
So you are saying that Jesus, if he existed/exists, is not a god?
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Hatter" |
|
| Title: Re: QUESTIONS FOR THEISTS |
22 Mar 2007 03:29:58 PM |
|
|
On Jan 24, 12:53 am, "Pastor Frank" <P...@christfirst.edu> wrote:
"misanthropic_curmudgeon" <misanthropiccurmudg...@breastcancermail.com>
wrote in messagenews:1169509997.568616.99250@a75g2000cwd.googlegroups.com...> Pastor Frank wrote:
We did hear from God, who came personally in the flesh of Jesus Christ,
and we promptly nailed Him to a cross. Atheists are just awaiting for Him
to
come again, so they can kill Him all over again.
I feel sorry for your flock, Pastor Frank, if that is the level of
'teaching' and 'guidance' you offer.
I feel sorry for your mental state, if that's all the logic you can come
up with.
An athiest who was waiting for Jesus[TM] would not be an athiest,
because an athiest does not beleive Jesus[TM] existed/exists.
By very definition, anybody waiting for Jesus[TM] can not be an athiest.
Hogwash. An atheists is not one who disbelieves the existence of Jesus
Christ, but one who doesn't believe in god(s), as in 'give credence to
god(s)', regardless of whether they exist or not.
You are correct, an Atheist does not automatically mean they
disbelieve the historic figure of Jesus Christ.
However, they automaticly do reject the concept of his divinity.
So to say they are waiting for the event of the second coming, much
less "just to foil it," is just impossible.A second coming would
require a miracle of a divine nature. To say that atheists would await
it is foolishness of the highest order.
Hatter
.
|
|
|
| User: "Pastor Frank" |
|
| Title: Re: QUESTIONS FOR THEISTS |
26 Mar 2007 08:04:59 AM |
|
|
"Hatter" <Hatter23@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1174595398.634081.205010@y80g2000hsf.googlegroups.com...
On Jan 24, 12:53 am, "Pastor Frank" <P...@christfirst.edu> wrote:
"misanthropic_curmudgeon" <misanthropiccurmudg...@breastcancermail.com>
wrote in
messagenews:1169509997.568616.99250@a75g2000cwd.googlegroups.com...>
Pastor Frank wrote:
We did hear from God, who came personally in the flesh of Jesus
Christ,
and we promptly nailed Him to a cross. Atheists are just awaiting for
Him
to
come again, so they can kill Him all over again.
I feel sorry for your flock, Pastor Frank, if that is the level of
'teaching' and 'guidance' you offer.
I feel sorry for your mental state, if that's all the logic you can
come
up with.
An athiest who was waiting for Jesus[TM] would not be an athiest,
because an athiest does not beleive Jesus[TM] existed/exists.
By very definition, anybody waiting for Jesus[TM] can not be an
athiest.
Hogwash. An atheists is not one who disbelieves the existence of
Jesus
Christ, but one who doesn't believe in god(s), as in 'give credence to
god(s)', regardless of whether they exist or not.
You are correct, an Atheist does not automatically mean they
disbelieve the historic figure of Jesus Christ.
However, they automaticly do reject the concept of his divinity.
So to say they are waiting for the event of the second coming, much
less "just to foil it," is just impossible.A second coming would
require a miracle of a divine nature. To say that atheists would await
it is foolishness of the highest order.
Hatter
There are enough ways to interpret that so it makes sense. Only
committed atheists interpret deliberately so nothing makes sense, and can be
trashed effortlessly, ...besides flaming anyone disagreeing with them.
--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
.
|
|
|
| User: "Hatter" |
|
| Title: Re: QUESTIONS FOR THEISTS |
30 Mar 2007 07:28:47 AM |
|
|
On Mar 26, 9:04 am, "Pastor Frank" <P...@christfirst.edu> wrote:
"Hatter" <Hatte...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1174595398.634081.205010@y80g2000hsf.googlegroups.com...
On Jan 24, 12:53 am, "Pastor Frank" <P...@christfirst.edu> wrote:
"misanthropic_curmudgeon" <misanthropiccurmudg...@breastcancermail.com>
wrote in
messagenews:1169509997.568616.99250@a75g2000cwd.googlegroups.com...>
Pastor Frank wrote:
We did hear from God, who came personally in the flesh of Jesus
Christ,
and we promptly nailed Him to a cross. Atheists are just awaiting for
Him
to
come again, so they can kill Him all over again.
I feel sorry for your flock, Pastor Frank, if that is the level of
'teaching' and 'guidance' you offer.
I feel sorry for your mental state, if that's all the logic you can
come
up with.
An athiest who was waiting for Jesus[TM] would not be an athiest,
because an athiest does not beleive Jesus[TM] existed/exists.
By very definition, anybody waiting for Jesus[TM] can not be an
athiest.
Hogwash. An atheists is not one who disbelieves the existence of
Jesus
Christ, but one who doesn't believe in god(s), as in 'give credence to
god(s)', regardless of whether they exist or not.
You are correct, an Atheist does not automatically mean they
disbelieve the historic figure of Jesus Christ.
However, they automaticly do reject the concept of his divinity.
So to say they are waiting for the event of the second coming, much
less "just to foil it," is just impossible.A second coming would
require a miracle of a divine nature. To say that atheists would await
it is foolishness of the highest order.
Hatter
There are enough ways to interpret that so it makes sense.
Only if you are accepting of theist logic
Only committed atheists interpret deliberately so nothing makes sense,
Thank you
and can be
trashed effortlessly,
then do so.
What part of "a second coming" does not require acceptance of the
divine part of the tale? It is that basic. That is not some sort of
weird convoluted logic. "A second coming" by absolute definition goes
beyond the observed laws of the universe, and therefore is not an
event an atheist expects. For you to say so makes about as much sense
as me asserting a devout Christian does not expect a second coming.
Hatter
.
|
|
|
| User: "Pastor Frank" |
|
| Title: Re: QUESTIONS FOR THEISTS |
02 Apr 2007 09:35:39 PM |
|
|
"Hatter" <Hatter23@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1175257727.690855.230800@d57g2000hsg.googlegroups.com...
On Mar 26, 9:04 am, "Pastor Frank" <P...@christfirst.edu> wrote:
"Hatter" <Hatte...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1174595398.634081.205010@y80g2000hsf.googlegroups.com...
On Jan 24, 12:53 am, "Pastor Frank" <P...@christfirst.edu> wrote:
"misanthropic_curmudgeon"
<misanthropiccurmudg...@breastcancermail.com>
wrote in
messagenews:1169509997.568616.99250@a75g2000cwd.googlegroups.com...>
Pastor Frank wrote:
We did hear from God, who came personally in the flesh of Jesus
Christ,
and we promptly nailed Him to a cross. Atheists are just awaiting
for
Him to
come again, so they can kill Him all over again.
I feel sorry for your flock, Pastor Frank, if that is the level of
'teaching' and 'guidance' you offer.
I feel sorry for your mental state, if that's all the logic you
can
come up with.
An athiest who was waiting for Jesus[TM] would not be an athiest,
because an athiest does not beleive Jesus[TM] existed/exists.
By very definition, anybody waiting for Jesus[TM] can not be an
athiest.
Hogwash. An atheists is not one who disbelieves the existence of
Jesus
Christ, but one who doesn't believe in god(s), as in 'give credence to
god(s)', regardless of whether they exist or not.
You are correct, an Atheist does not automatically mean they
disbelieve the historic figure of Jesus Christ.
However, they automaticly do reject the concept of his divinity.
So to say they are waiting for the event of the second coming, much
less "just to foil it," is just impossible.A second coming would
require a miracle of a divine nature. To say that atheists would await
it is foolishness of the highest order.
Hatter
There are enough ways to interpret that so it makes sense.
Only if you are accepting of theist logic
Only committed atheists interpret deliberately so nothing makes sense,
Thank you
and can be trashed effortlessly,
then do so.
What part of "a second coming" does not require acceptance of the
divine part of the tale? It is that basic. That is not some sort of
weird convoluted logic. "A second coming" by absolute definition goes
beyond the observed laws of the universe, and therefore is not an
event an atheist expects. For you to say so makes about as much sense
as me asserting a devout Christian does not expect a second coming.
The Son of God is ALWAYS "coming", and never standing still or going
away.
--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
.
|
|
|
| User: "Hatter" |
|
| Title: Re: QUESTIONS FOR THEISTS |
03 Apr 2007 10:41:27 AM |
|
|
On Apr 2, 10:35 pm, "Pastor Frank" <P...@christfirst.edu> wrote:
"Hatter" <Hatte...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1175257727.690855.230800@d57g2000hsg.googlegroups.com...
On Mar 26, 9:04 am, "Pastor Frank" <P...@christfirst.edu> wrote:
"Hatter" <Hatte...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1174595398.634081.205010@y80g2000hsf.googlegroups.com...
On Jan 24, 12:53 am, "Pastor Frank" <P...@christfirst.edu> wrote:
"misanthropic_curmudgeon"
<misanthropiccurmudg...@breastcancermail.com>
wrote in
messagenews:1169509997.568616.99250@a75g2000cwd.googlegroups.com...>
Pastor Frank wrote:
We did hear from God, who came personally in the flesh of Jesus
Christ,
and we promptly nailed Him to a cross. Atheists are just awaiting
for
Him to
come again, so they can kill Him all over again.
I feel sorry for your flock, Pastor Frank, if that is the level of
'teaching' and 'guidance' you offer.
I feel sorry for your mental state, if that's all the logic you
can
come up with.
An athiest who was waiting for Jesus[TM] would not be an athiest,
because an athiest does not beleive Jesus[TM] existed/exists.
By very definition, anybody waiting for Jesus[TM] can not be an
athiest.
Hogwash. An atheists is not one who disbelieves the existence of
Jesus
Christ, but one who doesn't believe in god(s), as in 'give credence to
god(s)', regardless of whether they exist or not.
You are correct, an Atheist does not automatically mean they
disbelieve the historic figure of Jesus Christ.
However, they automaticly do reject the concept of his divinity.
So to say they are waiting for the event of the second coming, much
less "just to foil it," is just impossible.A second coming would
require a miracle of a divine nature. To say that atheists would await
it is foolishness of the highest order.
Hatter
There are enough ways to interpret that so it makes sense.
Only if you are accepting of theist logic
Only committed atheists interpret deliberately so nothing makes sense,
Thank you
and can be trashed effortlessly,
then do so.
What part of "a second coming" does not require acceptance of the
divine part of the tale? It is that basic. That is not some sort of
weird convoluted logic. "A second coming" by absolute definition goes
beyond the observed laws of the universe, and therefore is not an
event an atheist expects. For you to say so makes about as much sense
as me asserting a devout Christian does not expect a second coming.
The Son of God is ALWAYS "coming", and never standing still or going
away.
--
Posted via a free Usenet account fromhttp://www.teranews.com- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
How well said. The Son of God(character) is always coming...never
arriving. Even though the writing said he would be back in one
generation...people are still waiting despite it being nearly 2000
years later. Probably some dimwits will still be around 500 years from
now saying he's still coming.
Hatter
.
|
|
|
| User: "Pastor Frank" |
|
| Title: Re: QUESTIONS FOR THEISTS |
09 Apr 2007 02:10:49 AM |
|
|
"Hatter" <Hatter23@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1175614887.121873.25300@o5g2000hsb.googlegroups.com...
On Apr 2, 10:35 pm, "Pastor Frank" <P...@christfirst.edu> wrote:
"Hatter" <Hatte...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1175257727.690855.230800@d57g2000hsg.googlegroups.com...
On Mar 26, 9:04 am, "Pastor Frank" <P...@christfirst.edu> wrote:
"Hatter" <Hatte...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1174595398.634081.205010@y80g2000hsf.googlegroups.com...
On Jan 24, 12:53 am, "Pastor Frank" <P...@christfirst.edu> wrote:
"misanthropic_curmudgeon"
<misanthropiccurmudg...@breastcancermail.com>
wrote in
messagenews:1169509997.568616.99250@a75g2000cwd.googlegroups.com...>
Pastor Frank wrote:
We did hear from God, who came personally in the flesh of Jesus
Christ,
and we promptly nailed Him to a cross. Atheists are just
awaiting
for
Him to
come again, so they can kill Him all over again.
I feel sorry for your flock, Pastor Frank, if that is the level
of
'teaching' and 'guidance' you offer.
I feel sorry for your mental state, if that's all the logic you
can
come up with.
An athiest who was waiting for Jesus[TM] would not be an athiest,
because an athiest does not beleive Jesus[TM] existed/exists.
By very definition, anybody waiting for Jesus[TM] can not be an
athiest.
Hogwash. An atheists is not one who disbelieves the existence
of
Jesus
Christ, but one who doesn't believe in god(s), as in 'give credence
to
god(s)', regardless of whether they exist or not.
You are correct, an Atheist does not automatically mean they
disbelieve the historic figure of Jesus Christ.
However, they automaticly do reject the concept of his divinity.
So to say they are waiting for the event of the second coming, much
less "just to foil it," is just impossible.A second coming would
require a miracle of a divine nature. To say that atheists would
await
it is foolishness of the highest order.
Hatter
There are enough ways to interpret that so it makes sense.
Only if you are accepting of theist logic
Only committed atheists interpret deliberately so nothing makes sense,
Thank you
and can be trashed effortlessly,
then do so.
What part of "a second coming" does not require acceptance of the
divine part of the tale? It is that basic. That is not some sort of
weird convoluted logic. "A second coming" by absolute definition goes
beyond the observed laws of the universe, and therefore is not an
event an atheist expects. For you to say so makes about as much sense
as me asserting a devout Christian does not expect a second coming.
The Son of God is ALWAYS "coming", and never standing still or going
away.
How well said. The Son of God(character) is always coming...never
arriving. Even though the writing said he would be back in one
generation...people are still waiting despite it being nearly 2000
years later. Probably some dimwits will still be around 500 years from
now saying he's still coming.
Hatter
That's what anticipation is like, and that's why we always have reason
to rejoice in the coming of the Lord, whereas you cannot but complain
eternally about Him not arriving. It's the difference between heaven and
hell. You chose hell.
--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
.
|
|
|
| User: "Hatter" |
|
| Title: Re: QUESTIONS FOR THEISTS |
10 Apr 2007 06:54:05 AM |
|
|
On Apr 9, 3:10 am, "Pastor Frank" <P...@christfirst.edu> wrote:
"Hatter" <Hatte...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1175614887.121873.25300@o5g2000hsb.googlegroups.com...
On Apr 2, 10:35 pm, "Pastor Frank" <P...@christfirst.edu> wrote:
"Hatter" <Hatte...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1175257727.690855.230800@d57g2000hsg.googlegroups.com...
On Mar 26, 9:04 am, "Pastor Frank" <P...@christfirst.edu> wrote:
"Hatter" <Hatte...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1174595398.634081.205010@y80g2000hsf.googlegroups.com...
On Jan 24, 12:53 am, "Pastor Frank" <P...@christfirst.edu> wrote:
"misanthropic_curmudgeon"
<misanthropiccurmudg...@breastcancermail.com>
wrote in
messagenews:1169509997.568616.99250@a75g2000cwd.googlegroups.com...>
Pastor Frank wrote:
We did hear from God, who came personally in the flesh of Jesus
Christ,
and we promptly nailed Him to a cross. Atheists are just
awaiting
for
Him to
come again, so they can kill Him all over again.
I feel sorry for your flock, Pastor Frank, if that is the level
of
'teaching' and 'guidance' you offer.
I feel sorry for your mental state, if that's all the logic you
can
come up with.
An athiest who was waiting for Jesus[TM] would not be an athiest,
because an athiest does not beleive Jesus[TM] existed/exists.
By very definition, anybody waiting for Jesus[TM] can not be an
athiest.
Hogwash. An atheists is not one who disbelieves the existence
of
Jesus
Christ, but one who doesn't believe in god(s), as in 'give credence
to
god(s)', regardless of whether they exist or not.
You are correct, an Atheist does not automatically mean they
disbelieve the historic figure of Jesus Christ.
However, they automaticly do reject the concept of his divinity.
So to say they are waiting for the event of the second coming, much
less "just to foil it," is just impossible.A second coming would
require a miracle of a divine nature. To say that atheists would
await
it is foolishness of the highest order.
Hatter
There are enough ways to interpret that so it makes sense.
Only if you are accepting of theist logic
Only committed atheists interpret deliberately so nothing makes sense,
Thank you
and can be trashed effortlessly,
then do so.
What part of "a second coming" does not require acceptance of the
divine part of the tale? It is that basic. That is not some sort of
weird convoluted logic. "A second coming" by absolute definition goes
beyond the observed laws of the universe, and therefore is not an
event an atheist expects. For you to say so makes about as much sense
as me asserting a devout Christian does not expect a second coming.
The Son of God is ALWAYS "coming", and never standing still or going
away.
How well said. The Son of God(character) is always coming...never
arriving. Even though the writing said he would be back in one
generation...people are still waiting despite it being nearly 2000
years later. Probably some dimwits will still be around 500 years from
now saying he's still coming.
Hatter
That's what anticipation is like, and that's why we always have reason
to rejoice in the coming of the Lord, whereas you cannot but complain
eternally about Him not arriving. It's the difference between heaven and
hell. You chose hell.
Enjoy him eternally "not arriving." Some of us will prefer to ejoy
their time of existence and try to do some stuff to help their fellow
man in a real way rather than praying to a non existant god.
And once again you try to redefine reality...an Atheist cannot
"choose hell" no more than he can "anicipate the second coming" No
more than you can "reject the Happy Hunting Grounds" or "await the
coming of Osiris" Don't you get it? Or are you that stupid?
Hatter
Hatter
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Dubh Ghall" |
|
| Title: Re: QUESTIONS FOR THEISTS |
13 Apr 2007 10:44:11 AM |
|
|
On Mon, 9 Apr 2007 03:10:49 -0400, "Pastor Frank" <PF@christfirst.edu>
wrote:
How well said. The Son of God(character) is always coming...never
arriving. Even though the writing said he would be back in one
generation...people are still waiting despite it being nearly 2000
years later. Probably some dimwits will still be around 500 years from
now saying he's still coming.
Hatter
That's what anticipation is like, and that's why we always have reason
to rejoice in the coming of the Lord, whereas you cannot but complain
eternally about Him not arriving. It's the difference between heaven and
hell. You chose hell.
Are you then saying that you live in anticipation of an even which you
either, know is not going to happen, or which you do not want to
happen?
If so, yours has got to be the most perverted bit of reasoning, ever.
--
The spelling Like any opinion stated here
purely my own
#162 BAAWA Knight.
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Al Klein" |
|
| Title: Re: QUESTIONS FOR THEISTS |
03 Apr 2007 10:05:10 PM |
|
|
On 3 Apr 2007 08:41:27 -0700, "Hatter" <Hatter23@gmail.com> wrote:
How well said. The Son of God(character) is always coming...never
arriving. Even though the writing said he would be back in one
generation...people are still waiting despite it being nearly 2000
years later. Probably some dimwits will still be around 500 years from
now saying he's still coming.
There are still some dimwits saying that the world is flat, over 2,000
years after the intelligent people knew it was round. Give the
Christian dimwits some time to catch up.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Pastor Frank" |
|
| Title: Re: QUESTIONS FOR THEISTS |
13 Apr 2007 12:15:06 AM |
|
|
"Al Klein" <rukbat@pern.invalid> wrote in message
news:re56139kqqtj7dmvhabt97e6hkqr31pemv@4ax.com...
On 3 Apr 2007 08:41:27 -0700, "Hatter" <Hatter23@gmail.com> wrote:
How well said. The Son of God(character) is always coming...never
arriving. Even though the writing said he would be back in one
generation...people are still waiting despite it being nearly 2000
years later. Probably some dimwits will still be around 500 years from
now saying he's still coming.
There are still some dimwits saying that the world is flat, over 2,000
years after the intelligent people knew it was round. Give the
Christian dimwits some time to catch up.
Glad you admit believing in something you have been told, but haven't
verified yourself. What if the earth is both flat AND round? Like a hockey
puck perhaps? Wouldn't that make you a "dimwit" bigot? But then guys like
you are never wrong, aren't they?
--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
.
|
|
|
| User: "Hatter" |
|
| Title: Re: QUESTIONS FOR THEISTS |
13 Apr 2007 07:28:06 AM |
|
|
On Apr 13, 1:15 am, "Pastor Frank" <P...@christfirst.edu> wrote:
"Al Klein" <ruk...@pern.invalid> wrote in message
news:re56139kqqtj7dmvhabt97e6hkqr31pemv@4ax.com...> On 3 Apr 2007 08:41:27 -0700, "Hatter" <Hatte...@gmail.com> wrote:
How well said. The Son of God(character) is always coming...never
arriving. Even though the writing said he would be back in one
generation...people are still waiting despite it being nearly 2000
years later. Probably some dimwits will still be around 500 years from
now saying he's still coming.
There are still some dimwits saying that the world is flat, over 2,000
years after the intelligent people knew it was round. Give the
Christian dimwits some time to catch up.
Glad you admit believing in something you have been told, but haven't
verified yourself. What if the earth is both flat AND round? Like a hockey
puck perhaps? Wouldn't that make you a "dimwit" bigot? But then guys like
you are never wrong, aren't they?
--
Posted via a free Usenet account fromhttp://www.teranews.com
So your allegation is that the earth could be hockey puck shaped?
Ahh that explains your loose grasp on reality
Hatter
.
|
|
|
| User: "Pastor Frank" |
|
| Title: Re: QUESTIONS FOR THEISTS |
14 Apr 2007 08:29:34 AM |
|
|
"Hatter" <Hatter23@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1176467286.218572.198520@p77g2000hsh.googlegroups.com...
On Apr 13, 1:15 am, "Pastor Frank" <P...@christfirst.edu> wrote:
"Al Klein" <ruk...@pern.invalid> wrote in message
news:re56139kqqtj7dmvhabt97e6hkqr31pemv@4ax.com...> On 3 Apr 2007
08:41:27 -0700, "Hatter" <Hatte...@gmail.com> wrote:
How well said. The Son of God(character) is always coming...never
arriving. Even though the writing said he would be back in one
generation...people are still waiting despite it being nearly 2000
years later. Probably some dimwits will still be around 500 years from
now saying he's still coming.
There are still some dimwits saying that the world is flat, over 2,000
years after the intelligent people knew it was round. Give the
Christian dimwits some time to catch up.
Glad you admit believing in something you have been told, but haven't
verified yourself. What if the earth is both flat AND round? Like a
hockey
puck perhaps? Wouldn't that make you a "dimwit" bigot? But then guys like
you are never wrong, aren't they?
So your allegation is that the earth could be hockey puck shaped?
Ahh that explains your loose grasp on reality
Hatter
The "reality" is that we caught you believing in what you were told, not
what you checked out personally to be true. That makes you a true-believer,
and no different from us religionists. LOL "grasp on reality" indeed!!!!
--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
.
|
|
|
| User: "Hatter" |
|
| Title: Re: QUESTIONS FOR THEISTS |
16 Apr 2007 07:14:59 AM |
|
|
On Apr 14, 9:29 am, "Pastor Frank" <P...@christfirst.edu> wrote:
"Hatter" <Hatte...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1176467286.218572.198520@p77g2000hsh.googlegroups.com...
On Apr 13, 1:15 am, "Pastor Frank" <P...@christfirst.edu> wrote:
"Al Klein" <ruk...@pern.invalid> wrote in message
news:re56139kqqtj7dmvhabt97e6hkqr31pemv@4ax.com...> On 3 Apr 2007
08:41:27 -0700, "Hatter" <Hatte...@gmail.com> wrote:
How well said. The Son of God(character) is always coming...never
arriving. Even though the writing said he would be back in one
generation...people are still waiting despite it being nearly 2000
years later. Probably some dimwits will still be around 500 years from
now saying he's still coming.
There are still some dimwits saying that the world is flat, over 2,000
years after the intelligent people knew it was round. Give the
Christian dimwits some time to catch up.
Glad you admit believing in something you have been told, but haven't
verified yourself. What if the earth is both flat AND round? Like a
hockey
puck perhaps? Wouldn't that make you a "dimwit" bigot? But then guys like
you are never wrong, aren't they?
So your allegation is that the earth could be hockey puck shaped?
Ahh that explains your loose grasp on reality
Hatter
The "reality" is that we caught you believing in what you were told, not
what you checked out personally to be true. That makes you a true-believer,
and no different from us religionists. LOL "grasp on reality" indeed!!!!
--
Posted via a free Usenet account fromhttp://www.teranews.com- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
The world isn't hockey puck shaped. Your semantic games don't change
reality.
Science is independently verifiable. Such the Ocean having a horizon
but when I'm higher up, a can see further. See independent
verification.
Your semantic games don't change reality.
Hatter
.
|
|
|
| User: "Pastor Frank" |
|
| Title: Re: QUESTIONS FOR THEISTS |
19 Apr 2007 04:20:39 AM |
|
|
"Hatter" <Hatter23@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1176725699.936089.103030@w1g2000hsg.googlegroups.com...
On Apr 14, 9:29 am, "Pastor Frank" <P...@christfirst.edu> wrote:
"Hatter" <Hatte...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1176467286.218572.198520@p77g2000hsh.googlegroups.com...
On Apr 13, 1:15 am, "Pastor Frank" <P...@christfirst.edu> wrote:
"Al Klein" <ruk...@pern.invalid> wrote in message
news:re56139kqqtj7dmvhabt97e6hkqr31pemv@4ax.com...> On 3 Apr 2007
08:41:27 -0700, "Hatter" <Hatte...@gmail.com> wrote:
How well said. The Son of God(character) is always coming...never
arriving. Even though the writing said he would be back in one
generation...people are still waiting despite it being nearly 2000
years later. Probably some dimwits will still be around 500 years
from
now saying he's still coming.
There are still some dimwits saying that the world is flat, over
2,000
years after the intelligent people knew it was round. Give the
Christian dimwits some time to catch up.
Glad you admit believing in something you have been told, but
haven't
verified yourself. What if the earth is both flat AND round? Like a
hockey
puck perhaps? Wouldn't that make you a "dimwit" bigot? But then guys
like
you are never wrong, aren't they?
So your allegation is that the earth could be hockey puck shaped?
Ahh that explains your loose grasp on reality
Hatter
The "reality" is that we caught you believing in what you were told,
not
what you checked out personally to be true. That makes you a
true-believer,
and no different from us religionists. LOL "grasp on reality" indeed!!!!
The world isn't hockey puck shaped. Your semantic games don't change
reality.
Science is independently verifiable. Such the Ocean having a horizon
but when I'm higher up, a can see further. See independent
verification.
Your semantic games don't change reality.
Hatter
Stand on the rounded part of a cylinder you get the same effect of
receding horizons. Tell us something you have personally tested to be true,
or do you only believe your white coated priests, who call themselves
scientists?
--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
.
|
|
|
| User: "Hatter" |
|
| Title: Re: QUESTIONS FOR THEISTS |
19 Apr 2007 11:49:00 AM |
|
|
On Apr 19, 5:20 am, "Pastor Frank" <P...@christfirst.edu> wrote:
"Hatter" <Hatte...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1176725699.936089.103030@w1g2000hsg.googlegroups.com...
On Apr 14, 9:29 am, "Pastor Frank" <P...@christfirst.edu> wrote:
"Hatter" <Hatte...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1176467286.218572.198520@p77g2000hsh.googlegroups.com...
On Apr 13, 1:15 am, "Pastor Frank" <P...@christfirst.edu> wrote:
"Al Klein" <ruk...@pern.invalid> wrote in message
news:re56139kqqtj7dmvhabt97e6hkqr31pemv@4ax.com...> On 3 Apr 2007
08:41:27 -0700, "Hatter" <Hatte...@gmail.com> wrote:
How well said. The Son of God(character) is always coming...never
arriving. Even though the writing said he would be back in one
generation...people are still waiting despite it being nearly 2000
years later. Probably some dimwits will still be around 500 years
from
now saying he's still coming.
There are still some dimwits saying that the world is flat, over
2,000
years after the intelligent people knew it was round. Give the
Christian dimwits some time to catch up.
Glad you admit believing in something you have been told, but
haven't
verified yourself. What if the earth is both flat AND round? Like a
hockey
puck perhaps? Wouldn't that make you a "dimwit" bigot? But then guys
like
you are never wrong, aren't they?
So your allegation is that the earth could be hockey puck shaped?
Ahh that explains your loose grasp on reality
Hatter
The "reality" is that we caught you believing in what you were told,
not
what you checked out personally to be true. That makes you a
true-believer,
and no different from us religionists. LOL "grasp on reality" indeed!!!!
The world isn't hockey puck shaped. Your semantic games don't change
reality.
Science is independently verifiable. Such the Ocean having a horizon
but when I'm higher up, a can see further. See independent
verification.
Your semantic games don't change reality.
Hatter
Stand on the rounded part of a cylinder you get the same effect of
receding horizons. Tell us something you have personally tested to be true,
or do you only believe your white coated priests, who call themselves
scientists?
--
Posted via a free Usenet account fromhttp://www.teranews.com- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
I can rotate my body 90 degrees and still have the same effect. Well
that 'cylinder theory' was certainly not difficult to disprove, it
required me moving af my feet.
White coated priests...ha! What a liar you are.
Hatter
.
|
|
|
| User: "Hatter" |
|
| Title: Re: QUESTIONS FOR THEISTS |
20 Apr 2007 10:37:03 AM |
|
|
On Apr 19, 12:49 pm, Hatter <Hatte...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Apr 19, 5:20 am, "Pastor Frank" <P...@christfirst.edu> wrote:
"Hatter" <Hatte...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1176725699.936089.103030@w1g2000hsg.googlegroups.com...
On Apr 14, 9:29 am, "Pastor Frank" <P...@christfirst.edu> wrote:
"Hatter" <Hatte...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1176467286.218572.198520@p77g2000hsh.googlegroups.com...
On Apr 13, 1:15 am, "Pastor Frank" <P...@christfirst.edu> wrote:
"Al Klein" <ruk...@pern.invalid> wrote in message
news:re56139kqqtj7dmvhabt97e6hkqr31pemv@4ax.com...> On 3 Apr 2007
08:41:27 -0700, "Hatter" <Hatte...@gmail.com> wrote:
How well said. The Son of God(character) is always coming...never
arriving. Even though the writing said he would be back in one
generation...people are still waiting despite it being nearly 2000
years later. Probably some dimwits will still be around 500 years
from
now saying he's still coming.
There are still some dimwits saying that the world is flat, over
2,000
years after the intelligent people knew it was round. Give the
Christian dimwits some time to catch up.
Glad you admit believing in something you have been told, but
haven't
verified yourself. What if the earth is both flat AND round? Like a
hockey
puck perhaps? Wouldn't that make you a "dimwit" bigot? But then guys
like
you are never wrong, aren't they?
So your allegation is that the earth could be hockey puck shaped?
Ahh that explains your loose grasp on reality
Hatter
The "reality" is that we caught you believing in what you were told,
not
what you checked out personally to be true. That makes you a
true-believer,
and no different from us religionists. LOL "grasp on reality" indeed!!!!
The world isn't hockey puck shaped. Your semantic games don't change
reality.
Science is independently verifiable. Such the Ocean having a horizon
but when I'm higher up, a can see further. See independent
verification.
Your semantic games don't change reality.
Hatter
Stand on the rounded part of a cylinder you get the same effect of
receding horizons. Tell us something you have personally tested to be true,
or do you only believe your white coated priests, who call themselves
scientists?
--
Posted via a free Usenet account fromhttp://www.teranews.com-Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
I can rotate my body 90 degrees and still have the same effect. Well
that 'cylinder theory' was certainly not difficult to disprove, it
required me moving all of one of my feet.
White coated priests...ha! What a liar you are.
Hatter- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
Corrected typo
.
|
|
|
| User: "Pastor Frank" |
|
| Title: Re: QUESTIONS FOR THEISTS |
21 Apr 2007 08:51:40 AM |
|
|
"Hatter" <Hatter23@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1177083423.637048.142230@p77g2000hsh.googlegroups.com...
On Apr 19, 12:49 pm, Hatter <Hatte...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Apr 19, 5:20 am, "Pastor Frank" <P...@christfirst.edu> wrote:
Stand on the rounded part of a cylinder you get the same effect of
receding horizons. Tell us something you have personally tested to be
true,
or do you only believe your white coated priests, who call themselves
scientists?
I can rotate my body 90 degrees and still have the same effect. Well
that 'cylinder theory' was certainly not difficult to disprove, it
required me moving all of one of my feet.
White coated priests...ha! What a liar you are.
So you admit not believe in scientists either? Tell us whom DO you
believe? What about your mom and dad?
--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
.
|
|
|
| User: "Hatter" |
|
| Title: Re: QUESTIONS FOR THEISTS |
23 Apr 2007 07:12:02 AM |
|
|
On Apr 21, 9:51 am, "Pastor Frank" <P...@christfirst.edu> wrote:
"Hatter" <Hatte...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1177083423.637048.142230@p77g2000hsh.googlegroups.com...> On Apr 19, 12:49 pm,Hatter<Hatte...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Apr 19, 5:20 am, "Pastor Frank" <P...@christfirst.edu> wrote:
Stand on the rounded part of a cylinder you get the same effect of
receding horizons. Tell us something you have personally tested to be
true,
or do you only believe your white coated priests, who call themselves
scientists?
I can rotate my body 90 degrees and still have the same effect. Well
that 'cylinder theory' was certainly not difficult to disprove, it
required me moving all of one of my feet.
White coated priests...ha! What a liar you are.
So you admit not believe in scientists either? Tell us whom DO you
believe? What about your mom and dad?
--
Posted via a free Usenet account fromhttp://www.teranews.com
So If I believe scientist..I'm wrong as I'm treating them as another
preisthood, but if I independently verify the type of things I can
easily check to make sure they aren't also just prehaps telling me
lies....then I'm don't believe them at all and I'm wrong.
You are a complete *****. How did you think I would see through that
little sham? I'm not an idiot theist, I figure out semantics games.
Hatter
.
|
|
|
| User: "Pastor Frank" |
|
| Title: Re: QUESTIONS FOR THEISTS |
25 Apr 2007 11:23:59 PM |
|
|
"Hatter" <Hatter23@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1177330322.054383.295350@b75g2000hsg.googlegroups.com...
On Apr 21, 9:51 am, "Pastor Frank" <P...@christfirst.edu> wrote:
"Hatter" <Hatte...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1177083423.637048.142230@p77g2000hsh.googlegroups.com...> On Apr 19,
12:49 pm,Hatter<Hatte...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Apr 19, 5:20 am, "Pastor Frank" <P...@christfirst.edu> wrote:
Stand on the rounded part of a cylinder you get the same effect
of
receding horizons. Tell us something you have personally tested to
be
true,
or do you only believe your white coated priests, who call
themselves
scientists?
I can rotate my body 90 degrees and still have the same effect. Well
that 'cylinder theory' was certainly not difficult to disprove, it
required me moving all of one of my feet.
White coated priests...ha! What a liar you are.
So you admit not believe in scientists either? Tell us whom DO you
believe? What about your mom and dad?
So If I believe scientist..I'm wrong as I'm treating them as another
preisthood, but if I independently verify the type of things I can
easily check to make sure they aren't also just prehaps telling me
lies....then I'm don't believe them at all and I'm wrong.
You are a complete *****. How did you think I would see through that
little sham? I'm not an idiot theist, I figure out semantics games.
Hatter
I bet you believe men actually landed on the moon, not just dropped
reflectors etc. etc. from their orbiting capsule, ...because you believe
someone, not because you verified it. "Semantic games" Indeed!!!!!
--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
.
|
|
|
| User: "Hatter" |
|
| Title: Re: QUESTIONS FOR THEISTS |
26 Apr 2007 02:48:33 PM |
|
|
On Apr 26, 12:23 am, "Pastor Frank" <P...@christfirst.edu> wrote:
"Hatter" <Hatte...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1177330322.054383.295350@b75g2000hsg.googlegroups.com...
On Apr 21, 9:51 am, "Pastor Frank" <P...@christfirst.edu> wrote:
"Hatter" <Hatte...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1177083423.637048.142230@p77g2000hsh.googlegroups.com...> On Apr 19,
12:49 pm,Hatter<Hatte...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Apr 19, 5:20 am, "Pastor Frank" <P...@christfirst.edu> wrote:
Stand on the rounded part of a cylinder you get the same effect
of
receding horizons. Tell us something you have personally tested to
be
true,
or do you only believe your white coated priests, who call
themselves
scientists?
I can rotate my body 90 degrees and still have the same effect. Well
that 'cylinder theory' was certainly not difficult to disprove, it
required me moving all of one of my feet.
White coated priests...ha! What a liar you are.
So you admit not believe in scientists either? Tell us whom DO you
believe? What about your mom and dad?
So If I believe scientist..I'm wrong as I'm treating them as another
preisthood, but if I independently verify the type of things I can
easily check to make sure they aren't also just prehaps telling me
lies....then I'm don't believe them at all and I'm wrong.
You are a complete *****. How did you think I would see through that
little sham? I'm not an idiot theist, I figure out semantics games.
Hatter
I bet you believe men actually landed on the moon, not just dropped
reflectors etc. etc. from their orbiting capsule, ...because you believe
someone, not because you verified it. "Semantic games" Indeed!!!!!
--
Posted via a free Usenet account fromhttp://www.teranews.com- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
Science says a, I check it...true
Science says b, I check it...true
Science says c, I check it...true
Science says d, I check it...true
Science says e, I check it...true
Science says f, I check it...true
Science says g, I check it...true
Science says h, I check it...true
Science says i, I check it...true
Science says j, I check it...true
Science says k, I check it...true
Science says l, I check it...true
Science says M, I can't check it, but a throught l are involved. It
isn't hard to come to the conclusion M is true too.
Yes you are playing semantic games. Pretty damn childish ones I was
beyond being fooled by somewhere in sophmore year of highschool. Grow
up.
Either that or disprove the moon landings.
Hatter
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Dubh Ghall" |
|
| Title: Re: QUESTIONS FOR THEISTS |
21 Apr 2007 05:17:59 PM |
|
|
On Sat, 21 Apr 2007 09:51:40 -0400, "Pastor Frank"
<PF@christfirst.edu> wrote:
"Hatter" <Hatter23@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1177083423.637048.142230@p77g2000hsh.googlegroups.com...
On Apr 19, 12:49 pm, Hatter <Hatte...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Apr 19, 5:20 am, "Pastor Frank" <P...@christfirst.edu> wrote:
Stand on the rounded part of a cylinder you get the same effect of
receding horizons. Tell us something you have personally tested to be
true,
or do you only believe your white coated priests, who call themselves
scientists?
I can rotate my body 90 degrees and still have the same effect. Well
that 'cylinder theory' was certainly not difficult to disprove, it
required me moving all of one of my feet.
White coated priests...ha! What a liar you are.
So you admit not believe in scientists either? Tell us whom DO you
believe? What about your mom and dad?
And again you lie.
Is it possible for you to speak without lying?
--
The spelling Like any opinion stated here
is purely my own
#162 BAAWA Knight.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Dubh Ghall" |
|
| Title: Re: QUESTIONS FOR THEISTS |
19 Apr 2007 06:25:48 PM |
|
|
On Thu, 19 Apr 2007 05:20:39 -0400, "Pastor Frank"
<PF@christfirst.edu> wrote:
Tell us something you have personally tested to be true,
or do you only believe your white coated priests, who call themselves
scientists?
I have tested far too many things to list, Frank, and my conclusion is
that scientists know what they are talking about. Of course, you have
to understand what they are saying, and do not make an ***** of your
self, by arguing against what you are told because it does not fit
your world view, or taking what they tell you, out of context.
By the time their discoveries reach the technicians, and engineers,
who are going to use the information, the only reason to test the
product, is to ensure that shoddy workmanship does not sabotage all
the scientists hard work.
--
The spelling Like any opinion stated here
is purely my own
#162 BAAWA Knight.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Al Klein" |
|
| Title: Re: QUESTIONS FOR THEISTS |
19 Apr 2007 10:04:05 PM |
|
|
On Thu, 19 Apr 2007 23:25:48 GMT, Dubh Ghall <puck@pooks.hill.fey>
wrote:
On Thu, 19 Apr 2007 05:20:39 -0400, "Pastor Frank"
<PF@christfirst.edu> wrote:
Tell us something you have personally tested to be true,
or do you only believe your white coated priests, who call themselves
scientists?
I have tested far too many things to list, Frank, and my conclusion is
that scientists know what they are talking about.
Frank has tested many aspects of computer science and has found them
to be true, but he's too stupid to realize it.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
