| Topic: |
Religions > Atheism |
| User: |
"JTEM" |
| Date: |
07 May 2005 03:37:19 AM |
| Object: |
Quiz yourself! |
Europeans might have even more fun with this
than Americans....
http://paulkienitz.net/republican.html
.
|
|
| User: "Roy Culley" |
|
| Title: Re: Quiz yourself! |
07 May 2005 07:23:48 AM |
|
|
<ouudnb4Guuiz4eHfRVn-gg@comcast.com>,
"JTEM" <gymraven@hotmail.com> writes:
Europeans might have even more fun with this
than Americans....
http://paulkienitz.net/republican.html
You are: 3% Republican.
You're a complete liberal, utterly without a trace of Republicanism.
Your strength is as the strength of ten because your heart is pure.
(You hope.)
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "David H." |
|
| Title: Re: Quiz yourself! |
07 May 2005 08:02:42 AM |
|
|
"JTEM" <gymraven@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:ouudnb4Guuiz4eHfRVn-gg@comcast.com...
Europeans might have even more fun with this
than Americans....
http://paulkienitz.net/republican.html
%50 Republican
Congratulations, you're a swing voter. When they say "NASCAR Dad", they
mean you. Every Republican ad on the TV set was made just for your viewing
pleasure. Don't you feel special?
That's odd. I don't like NASCAR at all...
David H. aa#2217
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Enkidu the Atheist" |
|
| Title: Re: Quiz yourself! |
07 May 2005 09:42:01 AM |
|
|
"JTEM" <gymraven@hotmail.com> wrote in news:ouudnb4Guuiz4eHfRVn-
gg@comcast.com:
Europeans might have even more fun with this
than Americans....
http://paulkienitz.net/republican.html
You are: 2% Republican.
You're a complete liberal, utterly without a trace of Republicanism.
Your strength is as the strength of ten because your heart is pure. (You
hope.)
YEE HAW!
--
Enkidu AA#2165
EAC Chaplin and ordained minister,
ULC, Modesto, CA
We may not doubt that society in heaven consists mainly of undesirable
persons.
-- Mark Twain
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Tim Benzedrine" |
|
| Title: Re: Quiz yourself! |
07 May 2005 03:44:53 PM |
|
|
I saw "JTEM" <gymraven@hotmail.com>
where?
there on the stair
where on the stair?
right there
"JTEM" <gymraven@hotmail.com> with clogs on
well I declare!
going:
Europeans might have even more fun with this
than Americans....
http://paulkienitz.net/republican.html
You are:
-23%
Republican
The Marxists are too reactionary for you. With people like you
around, America collectively thanks God for John Ashcroft.
David Silverman F.L.A.H.N. aa #2208
Due to be prayed for by Gastrich 11.3.2011
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Sean C" |
|
| Title: Re: Quiz yourself! |
07 May 2005 02:09:00 PM |
|
|
In article <ouudnb4Guuiz4eHfRVn-gg@comcast.com>, JTEM
<gymraven@hotmail.com> wrote:
Europeans might have even more fun with this
than Americans....
http://paulkienitz.net/republican.html
You are:
1%
Republican.
You're a complete liberal, utterly without a trace of Republicanism.
Your strength is as the strength of ten because your heart is pure.
(You hope.)
Clearly, I deserve to be shot.
Sean C
.
|
|
|
| User: "Harry F. Leopold" |
|
| Title: Re: Quiz yourself! |
09 May 2005 09:52:11 AM |
|
|
On Sat, 7 May 2005 14:09:00 -0500, Sean C wrote
(in article <070520051509004763%redhawk@burnspammersalive.com>):
In article <ouudnb4Guuiz4eHfRVn-gg@comcast.com>, JTEM
<gymraven@hotmail.com> wrote:
Europeans might have even more fun with this
than Americans....
http://paulkienitz.net/republican.html
You are:
1%
Republican.
You're a complete liberal, utterly without a trace of Republicanism.
Your strength is as the strength of ten because your heart is pure.
(You hope.)
Clearly, I deserve to be shot.
You certainly should be, how the hell did you score one-seventh what I got?
--
Harry F. Leopold
aa #2076
AA/Vet #4
The Prints of Darkness
(remove gene to email)
"Letting loafing leaves lie, leads lamentably to large lizard
liquidation?"-Zamboni
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Bill Baker" |
|
| Title: Re: Quiz yourself! |
07 May 2005 05:29:23 AM |
|
|
JTEM wrote:
Europeans might have even more fun with this
than Americans....
http://paulkienitz.net/republican.html
You are: 14% Republican. You're a tax-and-spend liberal democrat.
People like you are the reason everyone else votes for guys like Reagan
or George W.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Meteorite Debris" |
|
| Title: Re: Quiz yourself! |
08 May 2005 03:44:15 AM |
|
|
On Sat, 7 May 2005 04:37:19 -0400 the ET form known as
JTEM<gymraven@hotmail.com> sent a radio signal across the vast expanse
of deep space -._.--._.--._.--._.--._.--._.
http://paulkienitz.net/republican.html
You are:
-14%
Republican.
The Marxists are too reactionary for you. With people like you
around, America collectively thanks God for John Ashcroft.
--
Remove YOUR_SHOES before replying
apatriot #1, atheist #1417,
Chief EAC prophet
Jason Gastrich is praying for me on 8 January 2009
http://members.optusnet.com.au/~pk1956/
Apatriotism Yahoo Group
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/apatriotism
Sunday: A day given over by Americans to wishing that they themselves
were dead and in Heaven, and that their neighbors were dead and in
Hell.
-Mencken
.
|
|
|
| User: "JTEM" |
|
| Title: Re: Quiz yourself! |
09 May 2005 02:54:17 AM |
|
|
"Meteorite Debris" <epicurus1@YOUR_SHOESoptusnet.com.au> wrote
The Marxists are too reactionary for you. With people
like you around, America collectively thanks God for
John Ashcroft.
Actually, that sounds fairly typical of your average Republican
voter. I mean, not being aware of the fact that John Ashcroft
stepped down...
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Daniel Kolle" |
|
| Title: Re: Quiz yourself! |
07 May 2005 01:39:29 PM |
|
|
On Sat, 7 May 2005 04:37:19 -0400, "JTEM" <gymraven@hotmail.com>
thought hard and wrote:
Europeans might have even more fun with this
than Americans....
http://paulkienitz.net/republican.html
Ooo! 91%!
Tom DeLay and Karl Rove would be utterly proud of me.
--
-Daniel "Mr. Brevity" Kolle; 17 A.A. #2035
Koji Kondo, Yo-Yo Ma, Gustav Mahler, Krzysztof Penderecki, and Geirr Tveitt are my Gods.
Head of EAC Denial Department and Madly Insane Scientist.
.
|
|
|
| User: "JTEM" |
|
| Title: Re: Quiz yourself! |
09 May 2005 02:52:19 AM |
|
|
"Daniel Kolle" <Daniel.Kolle@gmail.com> wrote
Ooo! 91%!
Tom DeLay and Karl Rove would be utterly proud of me.
We didn't need a test for that!
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Harry F. Leopold" |
|
| Title: Re: Quiz yourself! |
09 May 2005 09:51:08 AM |
|
|
On Sat, 7 May 2005 13:39:29 -0500, Daniel Kolle wrote
(in article <7q2q71h5lv7c2vfjcvuvjvibf5p8t3tsp4@4ax.com>):
On Sat, 7 May 2005 04:37:19 -0400, "JTEM" <gymraven@hotmail.com>
thought hard and wrote:
Europeans might have even more fun with this
than Americans....
http://paulkienitz.net/republican.html
Ooo! 91%!
Tom DeLay and Karl Rove would be utterly proud of me.
7%, I am surprised that I scored that high.
--
Harry F. Leopold
aa #2076
AA/Vet #4
The Prints of Darkness
(remove gene to email)
³You have the right to remain stupid anything we say can and will be used
against you...³ - Johac
.
|
|
|
| User: "Robibnikoff" |
|
| Title: Re: Quiz yourself! |
09 May 2005 10:16:35 AM |
|
|
"Harry F. Leopold" <hleopold@coxyx.net> wrote in message
news:0001HW.BEA4E30C001D8695F0284550@news.central.cox.net...
On Sat, 7 May 2005 13:39:29 -0500, Daniel Kolle wrote
(in article <7q2q71h5lv7c2vfjcvuvjvibf5p8t3tsp4@4ax.com>):
On Sat, 7 May 2005 04:37:19 -0400, "JTEM" <gymraven@hotmail.com>
thought hard and wrote:
Europeans might have even more fun with this
than Americans....
http://paulkienitz.net/republican.html
Ooo! 91%!
Tom DeLay and Karl Rove would be utterly proud of me.
7%, I am surprised that I scored that high.
I got 27% WTF?!?
--
------
Robyn
Resident Witchypoo
#1557
Science doesn't burn people at the stake for disagreeing - Vic Sagerquist
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "pan" |
|
| Title: Re: Quiz yourself! |
07 May 2005 03:42:38 AM |
|
|
On Sat, 7 May 2005 04:37:19 -0400, "JTEM" <gymraven@hotmail.com>
wrote:
Europeans might have even more fun with this
than Americans....
http://paulkienitz.net/republican.html
My score:
31% Republican
"You're probably one of those chicken-littles who thinks maybe we
should worry a little bit, occasionally, about the fate of the planet
that our lives all depend on."
pan
.
|
|
|
| User: "kathryn" |
|
| Title: Re: Quiz yourself! |
07 May 2005 04:11:25 AM |
|
|
"pan" <couchslothsnake--remove_serpent--@netzero.com> wrote in message
news:lovo7116spimtf66k0iqlvv6c8bab2p782@4ax.com...
On Sat, 7 May 2005 04:37:19 -0400, "JTEM" <gymraven@hotmail.com>
wrote:
Europeans might have even more fun with this
than Americans....
http://paulkienitz.net/republican.html
My score:
31% Republican
"You're probably one of those chicken-littles who thinks maybe we
should worry a little bit, occasionally, about the fate of the planet
that our lives all depend on."
pan
You are:
27%
Republican. You're probably one of those people who still thinks that
getting a ***** is not an impeachable offense.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Andrealphus" |
|
| Title: Re: Quiz yourself! |
07 May 2005 05:35:00 AM |
|
|
kathryn <nospam@here.com> wrote:
"pan" <couchslothsnake--remove_serpent--@netzero.com> wrote in message
news:lovo7116spimtf66k0iqlvv6c8bab2p782@4ax.com...
On Sat, 7 May 2005 04:37:19 -0400, "JTEM" <gymraven@hotmail.com>
wrote:
Europeans might have even more fun with this
than Americans....
http://paulkienitz.net/republican.html
My score:
31% Republican
"You're probably one of those chicken-littles who thinks maybe we
should worry a little bit, occasionally, about the fate of the planet
that our lives all depend on."
pan
You are:
27%
Republican. You're probably one of those people who still thinks that
getting a ***** is not an impeachable offense.
Getting a ***** isn't an impeachable offense. Lying to a Senate
Investigation committee about getting a ***** is an impeachable offense.
--
"Only Buddhism is compatible with science. It covers the smallest
particles to the largest creations of the cosmos. It is the only
religion capable of scientific truth."
Albert Einstein
.
|
|
|
| User: "kathryn" |
|
| Title: Re: Quiz yourself! |
07 May 2005 05:58:06 AM |
|
|
"Andrealphus" <OHNOLETSGO@NARNIA.WHOCARES_4> wrote in message
news:oR0fe.8678$HL2.1747@newsread3.news.pas.earthlink.net...
kathryn <nospam@here.com> wrote:
"pan" <couchslothsnake--remove_serpent--@netzero.com> wrote in message
news:lovo7116spimtf66k0iqlvv6c8bab2p782@4ax.com...
On Sat, 7 May 2005 04:37:19 -0400, "JTEM" <gymraven@hotmail.com>
wrote:
Europeans might have even more fun with this
than Americans....
http://paulkienitz.net/republican.html
My score:
31% Republican
"You're probably one of those chicken-littles who thinks maybe we
should worry a little bit, occasionally, about the fate of the planet
that our lives all depend on."
pan
You are:
27%
Republican. You're probably one of those people who still thinks that
getting a ***** is not an impeachable offense.
Getting a ***** isn't an impeachable offense. Lying to a Senate
Investigation committee about getting a ***** is an impeachable offense.
It's none of the senates business how many blow jobs someone has
.
|
|
|
| User: "Therion Ware" |
|
| Title: Re: Quiz yourself! |
07 May 2005 06:07:38 AM |
|
|
On Sat, 7 May 2005 10:58:06 +0000 (UTC) in alt.atheism, kathryn
("kathryn" <nospam@here.com>) said, directing the reply to
alt.atheism
"Andrealphus" <OHNOLETSGO@NARNIA.WHOCARES_4> wrote in message
news:oR0fe.8678$HL2.1747@newsread3.news.pas.earthlink.net...
kathryn <nospam@here.com> wrote:
"pan" <couchslothsnake--remove_serpent--@netzero.com> wrote in message
news:lovo7116spimtf66k0iqlvv6c8bab2p782@4ax.com...
On Sat, 7 May 2005 04:37:19 -0400, "JTEM" <gymraven@hotmail.com>
wrote:
Europeans might have even more fun with this
than Americans....
http://paulkienitz.net/republican.html
My score:
31% Republican
"You're probably one of those chicken-littles who thinks maybe we
should worry a little bit, occasionally, about the fate of the planet
that our lives all depend on."
pan
You are:
27%
Republican. You're probably one of those people who still thinks that
getting a ***** is not an impeachable offense.
Getting a ***** isn't an impeachable offense. Lying to a Senate
Investigation committee about getting a ***** is an impeachable offense.
It's none of the senates business how many blow jobs someone has
Oh I dunno. If someone has an unreasonable number, maybe they could
tax them and redistribute a proportion to the deserving, which come to
think of it may be one tax and spend policy that'd go down really well
with the electorate....
.
|
|
|
| User: "Bill Baker" |
|
| Title: Re: Quiz yourself! |
07 May 2005 12:28:33 PM |
|
|
On Sat, 07 May 2005 12:07:38 +0100, Therion Ware
<autodelete@city-of-dis.com> wrote in message
news:<h88p71ppdebiiidjrit99ovjgte3mbrqa2@4ax.com>...
On Sat, 7 May 2005 10:58:06 +0000 (UTC) in alt.atheism, kathryn
("kathryn" <nospam@here.com>) said, directing the reply to alt.atheism
"Andrealphus" <OHNOLETSGO@NARNIA.WHOCARES_4> wrote in message
news:oR0fe.8678$HL2.1747@newsread3.news.pas.earthlink.net...
kathryn <nospam@here.com> wrote:
"pan" <couchslothsnake--remove_serpent--@netzero.com> wrote in message
news:lovo7116spimtf66k0iqlvv6c8bab2p782@4ax.com...
On Sat, 7 May 2005 04:37:19 -0400, "JTEM" <gymraven@hotmail.com>
wrote:
Europeans might have even more fun with this than Americans....
http://paulkienitz.net/republican.html
My score:
31% Republican
"You're probably one of those chicken-littles who thinks maybe we
should worry a little bit, occasionally, about the fate of the planet
that our lives all depend on."
pan
You are:
27%
Republican. You're probably one of those people who still thinks that
getting a ***** is not an impeachable offense.
Getting a ***** isn't an impeachable offense. Lying to a Senate
Investigation committee about getting a ***** is an impeachable
offense.
It's none of the senates business how many blow jobs someone has
Oh I dunno. If someone has an unreasonable number, maybe they could tax
them and redistribute a proportion to the deserving, which come to think
of it may be one tax and spend policy that'd go down really well with the
electorate....
Pun not intended?
--
Lurlean Lie #31:
Did you know he finally admitted he's got smegma?
news:1dcee589.0411282155.61f2adf1@posting.google.com
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "stoney" |
|
| Title: Re: Quiz yourself! |
11 May 2005 01:10:39 PM |
|
|
On Sat, 7 May 2005 10:58:06 +0000 (UTC), "kathryn" <nospam@here.com>
wrote:
"Andrealphus" <OHNOLETSGO@NARNIA.WHOCARES_4> wrote in message
news:oR0fe.8678$HL2.1747@newsread3.news.pas.earthlink.net...
kathryn <nospam@here.com> wrote:
"pan" <couchslothsnake--remove_serpent--@netzero.com> wrote in message
news:lovo7116spimtf66k0iqlvv6c8bab2p782@4ax.com...
On Sat, 7 May 2005 04:37:19 -0400, "JTEM" <gymraven@hotmail.com>
wrote:
Europeans might have even more fun with this
than Americans....
http://paulkienitz.net/republican.html
My score:
31% Republican
"You're probably one of those chicken-littles who thinks maybe we
should worry a little bit, occasionally, about the fate of the planet
that our lives all depend on."
pan
You are:
27%
Republican. You're probably one of those people who still thinks that
getting a ***** is not an impeachable offense.
Getting a ***** isn't an impeachable offense. Lying to a Senate
Investigation committee about getting a ***** is an impeachable offense.
It's none of the senates business how many blow jobs someone has
Of course not. It is quite amusing though that three high-powered
"holier than thou" Rethugnicans who 'quivered with righteous
indignation' were found to have gotten much more than a ***** and
resigned in disgrace, but that is never mentioned.
--
Contempt of Congress meter reading-offscale.
Hello, theocracy with a fundamentalist US Supreme
Court who will ensure church and state are joined
at the hip like clergy and altar boys.
America 1776-Jan 2001 RIP
Religion is the original war crime.
-Michelle Malkin (Feb 26, 2005)
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Andrealphus" |
|
| Title: Re: Quiz yourself! |
07 May 2005 06:12:43 AM |
|
|
kathryn <nospam@here.com> wrote:
"Andrealphus" <OHNOLETSGO@NARNIA.WHOCARES_4> wrote in message
news:oR0fe.8678$HL2.1747@newsread3.news.pas.earthlink.net...
kathryn <nospam@here.com> wrote:
"pan" <couchslothsnake--remove_serpent--@netzero.com> wrote in
message news:lovo7116spimtf66k0iqlvv6c8bab2p782@4ax.com...
On Sat, 7 May 2005 04:37:19 -0400, "JTEM" <gymraven@hotmail.com>
wrote:
Europeans might have even more fun with this
than Americans....
http://paulkienitz.net/republican.html
My score:
31% Republican
"You're probably one of those chicken-littles who thinks maybe we
should worry a little bit, occasionally, about the fate of the
planet that our lives all depend on."
pan
You are:
27%
Republican. You're probably one of those people who still thinks
that getting a ***** is not an impeachable offense.
Getting a ***** isn't an impeachable offense. Lying to a Senate
Investigation committee about getting a ***** is an impeachable
offense.
It's none of the senates business how many blow jobs someone has
Actually, due to the circumstances, it was. When an investigations
committee asks you a question you have one of two viable choices. You can
tell the truth, or you can plead the 5th amendment. Clinton chose to
perjure himself. It doesn't much matter what the topic is, as a president,
if you perjure yourself in a senate investigation, it is an impeachable
offense. Just like any other court proceeding, if the question is
sustained as relevant, no matter what the content, no matter how personal or
how much you feel it is none of their business, and you lie, you can be
charged with perjury, fined, and/or jailed. A defendant or witness may be
asked any number of questions relating to their sex life to establish
motive, character, etc. Then Clinton repeated his lie to a Federal Grand
Jury. No matter how you look at it, lying to the Committee, then the Jury
was an impeachable offense under the Constitution.
--
"Only Buddhism is compatible with science. It covers the smallest
particles to the largest creations of the cosmos. It is the only
religion capable of scientific truth."
Albert Einstein
.
|
|
|
| User: "JTEM" |
|
| Title: Re: Quiz yourself! |
09 May 2005 02:45:45 AM |
|
|
"Andrealphus" <OHNOLETSGO@NARNIA.WHOCARES_4> wrote
Actually, due to the circumstances, it was. When
an investigations committee asks you a question
you have one of two viable choices.
Not to get technical, but investigations are supposed to investigate
things that already happened -- determine if a crime had or had
not taken place.
"Had or had not taken place."
That's all in the past tense, if you haven't notice.
This imaginary "Investigation" literally CREATED a crime.
By your own testimony here, if there was never any so-called
"Investigation" then there never could have been a crime.
So, rather than the black-and-white situation you would
have us pretend existed, we instead find a situation where
the investigators themselves were instrumental -- critical,
in fact -- to the commission of a crime.
In legal speak, this is most commonly referred to as "Entrapment."
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Jim Heckman" |
|
| Title: Re: Quiz yourself! |
07 May 2005 04:22:43 PM |
|
|
On 7-May-2005, "Andrealphus" <OHNOLETSGO@NARNIA.WHOCARES_4>
wrote in message <Lo1fe.8415$GQ5.5405@newsread1.news.pas.earthlink.net>:
Actually, due to the circumstances, it was. When an investigations
committee asks you a question you have one of two viable choices. You
can tell the truth, or you can plead the 5th amendment. Clinton chose
to perjure himself. It doesn't much matter what the topic is, as a
president, if you perjure yourself in a senate investigation, it is
an impeachable offense.
No. It's just a crime.
Just like any other court proceeding, if the
question is sustained as relevant, no matter what the content, no
matter how personal or how much you feel it is none of their
business, and you lie, you can be charged with perjury, fined, and/or
jailed.
But not impeached.
A defendant or witness may be asked any number of questions
relating to their sex life to establish motive, character, etc. Then
Clinton repeated his lie to a Federal Grand Jury. No matter how you
look at it, lying to the Committee, then the Jury was an impeachable
offense under the Constitution.
No. The Constitution specifies "high crimes and misdemeanors". No
reasonable person could interpret perjuring oneself about a ***** to
be such.
--
Jim Heckman
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "raven1" |
|
| Title: Re: Quiz yourself! |
07 May 2005 03:21:33 PM |
|
|
On Sat, 07 May 2005 11:12:43 GMT, "Andrealphus"
<OHNOLETSGO@NARNIA.WHOCARES_4> wrote:
kathryn <nospam@here.com> wrote:
"Andrealphus" <OHNOLETSGO@NARNIA.WHOCARES_4> wrote in message
news:oR0fe.8678$HL2.1747@newsread3.news.pas.earthlink.net...
kathryn <nospam@here.com> wrote:
"pan" <couchslothsnake--remove_serpent--@netzero.com> wrote in
message news:lovo7116spimtf66k0iqlvv6c8bab2p782@4ax.com...
On Sat, 7 May 2005 04:37:19 -0400, "JTEM" <gymraven@hotmail.com>
wrote:
Europeans might have even more fun with this
than Americans....
http://paulkienitz.net/republican.html
My score:
31% Republican
"You're probably one of those chicken-littles who thinks maybe we
should worry a little bit, occasionally, about the fate of the
planet that our lives all depend on."
pan
You are:
27%
Republican. You're probably one of those people who still thinks
that getting a ***** is not an impeachable offense.
Getting a ***** isn't an impeachable offense. Lying to a Senate
Investigation committee about getting a ***** is an impeachable
offense.
It's none of the senates business how many blow jobs someone has
Actually, due to the circumstances, it was. When an investigations
committee asks you a question you have one of two viable choices. You can
tell the truth, or you can plead the 5th amendment. Clinton chose to
perjure himself. It doesn't much matter what the topic is, as a president,
if you perjure yourself in a senate investigation, it is an impeachable
offense. Just like any other court proceeding, if the question is
sustained as relevant, no matter what the content, no matter how personal or
how much you feel it is none of their business, and you lie, you can be
charged with perjury, fined, and/or jailed. A defendant or witness may be
asked any number of questions relating to their sex life to establish
motive, character, etc. Then Clinton repeated his lie to a Federal Grand
Jury. No matter how you look at it, lying to the Committee, then the Jury
was an impeachable offense under the Constitution.
The House thought so, but the Senate begged to differ.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Andrealphus" |
|
| Title: Re: Quiz yourself! |
07 May 2005 03:37:00 PM |
|
|
raven1 <quoththeraven@nevermore.com> wrote:
On Sat, 07 May 2005 11:12:43 GMT, "Andrealphus"
<OHNOLETSGO@NARNIA.WHOCARES_4> wrote:
kathryn <nospam@here.com> wrote:
"Andrealphus" <OHNOLETSGO@NARNIA.WHOCARES_4> wrote in message
news:oR0fe.8678$HL2.1747@newsread3.news.pas.earthlink.net...
kathryn <nospam@here.com> wrote:
"pan" <couchslothsnake--remove_serpent--@netzero.com> wrote in
message news:lovo7116spimtf66k0iqlvv6c8bab2p782@4ax.com...
On Sat, 7 May 2005 04:37:19 -0400, "JTEM" <gymraven@hotmail.com>
wrote:
Europeans might have even more fun with this
than Americans....
http://paulkienitz.net/republican.html
My score:
31% Republican
"You're probably one of those chicken-littles who thinks maybe we
should worry a little bit, occasionally, about the fate of the
planet that our lives all depend on."
pan
You are:
27%
Republican. You're probably one of those people who still thinks
that getting a ***** is not an impeachable offense.
Getting a ***** isn't an impeachable offense. Lying to a Senate
Investigation committee about getting a ***** is an impeachable
offense.
It's none of the senates business how many blow jobs someone has
Actually, due to the circumstances, it was. When an investigations
committee asks you a question you have one of two viable choices.
You can tell the truth, or you can plead the 5th amendment.
Clinton chose to perjure himself. It doesn't much matter what the
topic is, as a president, if you perjure yourself in a senate
investigation, it is an impeachable offense. Just like any other
court proceeding, if the question is sustained as relevant, no
matter what the content, no matter how personal or how much you feel
it is none of their business, and you lie, you can be charged with
perjury, fined, and/or jailed. A defendant or witness may be asked
any number of questions relating to their sex life to establish
motive, character, etc. Then Clinton repeated his lie to a
Federal Grand Jury. No matter how you look at it, lying to the
Committee, then the Jury was an impeachable offense under the
Constitution.
The House thought so, but the Senate begged to differ.
And the Senate was wrong. Had that been any normal, every day joe, they'd
have been sitting in a cell right now over it.
--
"Only Buddhism is compatible with science. It covers the smallest
particles to the largest creations of the cosmos. It is the only
religion capable of scientific truth."
Albert Einstein
.
|
|
|
| User: "Enkidu the Atheist" |
|
| Title: Re: Quiz yourself! |
07 May 2005 04:00:00 PM |
|
|
"Andrealphus" <OHNOLETSGO@NARNIA.WHOCARES_4> wrote in
news:MF9fe.10404$HL2.3222@newsread3.news.pas.earthlink.net:
And the Senate was wrong. Had that been any normal, every day joe,
they'd have been sitting in a cell right now over it.
"They"? I assume to mean "he" as in President Clinton. And no, he
wouldn't, as they only penalty allowed under the Constitution is removal
from office. Jail was not an option, not a penalty the Sentate could have
imposed. Read the Constitution.
--
Enkidu AA#2165
EAC Chaplin and ordained minister,
ULC, Modesto, CA
Appraise the Lord: Tax church property.
-- bumper sticker
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "raven1" |
|
| Title: Re: Quiz yourself! |
07 May 2005 03:50:59 PM |
|
|
On Sat, 07 May 2005 20:37:00 GMT, "Andrealphus"
<OHNOLETSGO@NARNIA.WHOCARES_4> wrote:
raven1 <quoththeraven@nevermore.com> wrote:
On Sat, 07 May 2005 11:12:43 GMT, "Andrealphus"
<OHNOLETSGO@NARNIA.WHOCARES_4> wrote:
kathryn <nospam@here.com> wrote:
"Andrealphus" <OHNOLETSGO@NARNIA.WHOCARES_4> wrote in message
news:oR0fe.8678$HL2.1747@newsread3.news.pas.earthlink.net...
kathryn <nospam@here.com> wrote:
"pan" <couchslothsnake--remove_serpent--@netzero.com> wrote in
message news:lovo7116spimtf66k0iqlvv6c8bab2p782@4ax.com...
On Sat, 7 May 2005 04:37:19 -0400, "JTEM" <gymraven@hotmail.com>
wrote:
Europeans might have even more fun with this
than Americans....
http://paulkienitz.net/republican.html
My score:
31% Republican
"You're probably one of those chicken-littles who thinks maybe we
should worry a little bit, occasionally, about the fate of the
planet that our lives all depend on."
pan
You are:
27%
Republican. You're probably one of those people who still thinks
that getting a ***** is not an impeachable offense.
Getting a ***** isn't an impeachable offense. Lying to a Senate
Investigation committee about getting a ***** is an impeachable
offense.
It's none of the senates business how many blow jobs someone has
Actually, due to the circumstances, it was. When an investigations
committee asks you a question you have one of two viable choices.
You can tell the truth, or you can plead the 5th amendment.
Clinton chose to perjure himself. It doesn't much matter what the
topic is, as a president, if you perjure yourself in a senate
investigation, it is an impeachable offense. Just like any other
court proceeding, if the question is sustained as relevant, no
matter what the content, no matter how personal or how much you feel
it is none of their business, and you lie, you can be charged with
perjury, fined, and/or jailed. A defendant or witness may be asked
any number of questions relating to their sex life to establish
motive, character, etc. Then Clinton repeated his lie to a
Federal Grand Jury. No matter how you look at it, lying to the
Committee, then the Jury was an impeachable offense under the
Constitution.
The House thought so, but the Senate begged to differ.
And the Senate was wrong.
LOL! The REPUBLICAN majority Senate didn't even think the matter was
worth considering for more than a day or so, and voted overwhelmingly
to acquit. Get over it.
Had that been any normal, every day joe, they'd
have been sitting in a cell right now over it.
Had it been any "normal, every day joe", Ken Starr wouldn't have spent
millions of taxpayer's dollars investigating matters outside the scope
of his commission, which were completely irrelevant to the
investigation.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Kate " |
|
| Title: Re: Quiz yourself! |
07 May 2005 09:19:03 AM |
|
|
On Sat, 07 May 2005 11:12:43 GMT, "Andrealphus"
<OHNOLETSGO@NARNIA.WHOCARES_4> wrote:
kathryn <nospam@here.com> wrote:
"Andrealphus" <OHNOLETSGO@NARNIA.WHOCARES_4> wrote in message
news:oR0fe.8678$HL2.1747@newsread3.news.pas.earthlink.net...
kathryn <nospam@here.com> wrote:
"pan" <couchslothsnake--remove_serpent--@netzero.com> wrote in
message news:lovo7116spimtf66k0iqlvv6c8bab2p782@4ax.com...
On Sat, 7 May 2005 04:37:19 -0400, "JTEM" <gymraven@hotmail.com>
wrote:
Europeans might have even more fun with this
than Americans....
http://paulkienitz.net/republican.html
My score:
31% Republican
"You're probably one of those chicken-littles who thinks maybe we
should worry a little bit, occasionally, about the fate of the
planet that our lives all depend on."
pan
You are:
27%
Republican. You're probably one of those people who still thinks
that getting a ***** is not an impeachable offense.
Getting a ***** isn't an impeachable offense. Lying to a Senate
Investigation committee about getting a ***** is an impeachable
offense.
It's none of the senates business how many blow jobs someone has
Actually, due to the circumstances, it was. When an investigations
committee asks you a question you have one of two viable choices. You can
tell the truth, or you can plead the 5th amendment. Clinton chose to
perjure himself. It doesn't much matter what the topic is, as a president,
if you perjure yourself in a senate investigation, it is an impeachable
offense. Just like any other court proceeding, if the question is
sustained as relevant, no matter what the content, no matter how personal or
how much you feel it is none of their business, and you lie, you can be
charged with perjury, fined, and/or jailed. A defendant or witness may be
asked any number of questions relating to their sex life to establish
motive, character, etc. Then Clinton repeated his lie to a Federal Grand
Jury. No matter how you look at it, lying to the Committee, then the Jury
was an impeachable offense under the Constitution.
The point was - it was not relevant
.
|
|
|
| User: "Andrealphus" |
|
| Title: Re: Quiz yourself! |
07 May 2005 10:02:34 AM |
|
|
"Kate " <cobalt@newscene.com> wrote in message
news:427ccdb1.1661093@news-west.newscene.com...
On Sat, 07 May 2005 11:12:43 GMT, "Andrealphus"
<OHNOLETSGO@NARNIA.WHOCARES_4> wrote:
kathryn <nospam@here.com> wrote:
"Andrealphus" <OHNOLETSGO@NARNIA.WHOCARES_4> wrote in message
news:oR0fe.8678$HL2.1747@newsread3.news.pas.earthlink.net...
kathryn <nospam@here.com> wrote:
"pan" <couchslothsnake--remove_serpent--@netzero.com> wrote in
message news:lovo7116spimtf66k0iqlvv6c8bab2p782@4ax.com...
On Sat, 7 May 2005 04:37:19 -0400, "JTEM" <gymraven@hotmail.com>
wrote:
Europeans might have even more fun with this
than Americans....
http://paulkienitz.net/republican.html
My score:
31% Republican
"You're probably one of those chicken-littles who thinks maybe we
should worry a little bit, occasionally, about the fate of the
planet that our lives all depend on."
pan
You are:
27%
Republican. You're probably one of those people who still thinks
that getting a ***** is not an impeachable offense.
Getting a ***** isn't an impeachable offense. Lying to a Senate
Investigation committee about getting a ***** is an impeachable
offense.
It's none of the senates business how many blow jobs someone has
Actually, due to the circumstances, it was. When an investigations
committee asks you a question you have one of two viable choices. You
can
tell the truth, or you can plead the 5th amendment. Clinton chose to
perjure himself. It doesn't much matter what the topic is, as a
president,
if you perjure yourself in a senate investigation, it is an impeachable
offense. Just like any other court proceeding, if the question is
sustained as relevant, no matter what the content, no matter how personal
or
how much you feel it is none of their business, and you lie, you can be
charged with perjury, fined, and/or jailed. A defendant or witness may
be
asked any number of questions relating to their sex life to establish
motive, character, etc. Then Clinton repeated his lie to a Federal
Grand
Jury. No matter how you look at it, lying to the Committee, then the
Jury
was an impeachable offense under the Constitution.
The point was - it was not relevant
The point is - it's relevancy was not for Clinton to decide, nor was it
yours. The Senate Committee and the Jury were the sole arbiters of
relevancy in each of the seperate hearings. He perjured himself, it was an
impeachable offense. There is no gray area to be had here.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Sean C" |
|
| Title: Re: Quiz yourself! |
07 May 2005 02:24:54 PM |
|
|
In article <eM4fe.8807$HL2.5198@newsread3.news.pas.earthlink.net>,
Andrealphus <OHNOLETSGO@NARNIA.WHOCARES_4> wrote:
The point is - it's relevancy was not for Clinton to decide, nor was it
yours. The Senate Committee and the Jury were the sole arbiters of
relevancy in each of the seperate hearings. He perjured himself, it was an
impeachable offense. There is no gray area to be had here.
Can you explain why the question of whether or not he had consensual
sex with Monica Lewinski is relevant to whether or not he sexually
harassed Paula Jones? The former is not illegal and has no bearing
whatsoever on the reality of the latter.
Sean C
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
