Rabbis: Jerusalem Gay Parade May Lead to War

Religions > Atheism > Rabbis: Jerusalem Gay Parade May Lead to War

LINK TO THIS PAGE

rating : 0 | 0

Page 7 of 16

Topic:	Religions > Atheism
User:	"J Young"
Date:	19 Oct 2006 12:25:34 PM
Object:	Rabbis: Jerusalem Gay Parade May Lead to War

This is the homo community's opportunity to show the world how they too can
be patriotic to their homelands; In the name of peace, they should cancel
the parade. It's the only decent thing to do.
http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0%2C7340%2CL-3316776%2C00.html
Thousands of ultra-Orthodox protested at Jerusalem's Sabbath Square
Wednesday against the holding of the 2006 Gay Pride Parade in the city, with
most of them linking the parade to the recent war in Lebanon.
The parade is scheduled to take place on November 10.
"The war in the north broke out as soon as the parade was announced," a Mea
Shearim resident told Ynet.
The parade was canceled due to the war, but gay rights groups acted to set
another date for the parade since the fighting has ceased.
"Rabbis are fearful of another war," the haredi said, adding that a special
request has been forwarded to Diaspora Jews "so they too would protest and
act for the preservation of Jerusalem's sanctity."
Rabbi Moshe Sternbuch, the head of the Eda Haredit rabbinic court, said
during the rally, "We did not succeed in Lebanon due to the obscenity and
promiscuity in the Holy Land."
The rabbi quoted Rabbi Wasserman, who said during the Holocaust that
"Zionism has destroyed the Land of Israel's sanctity; this is how the
troubles of the Shoah began, and this is why we must act to wend the
promiscuity.
"There is no greater disturbance than the disgraceful parade," Rabbi
Sternbuch said.
Despite the fact that Jerusalem Mayor Uri Lupolianski called out against
holding the parade in the city, many in the haredi community hold him
directly responsible.
"The municipality did not protest against the holding of the terrible
abomination parade," Rabbi Sternbuch said.
The haredim also presented other "divine signs" against the Jerusalem gay
parade: The parsha for the Sabbath following the parade is Vayera from the
book of Genesis, which tells of the total destruction of Sodom by G-d.
The parade falls on the day after the 16th anniversary of the murder of
Rabbi Meir Kahane, and his followers, who are expected visit his grave on
the Mount of Olives on the day the parade is scheduled to take place, said
they would 'take advantage of the memorial ceremony for Kahane to fight the
gay parade.'
The Open House organization said the renewed campaign against the gay parade
will not deter community members or prevent the parade from taking place.
"The Pride and Tolerance Parade in Jerusalem is a human rights rally aimed
at promoting freedom of expression and pluralism," the group's acting
chairperson said.
"Therefore we respect the right of those who object to the parade to express
their views in a legitimate manner; however, we warn of a renewal of the
incitement and violence."
--
--
----------
J Y�ung
youngopinions@aol.com
.

User: "The Revrddd"
Title: Re: Rabbis: Jerusalem Gay Parade May Lead to War	24 Oct 2006 06:49:31 AM

On Mon, 23 Oct 2006 23:01:09 GMT, Strife767 <strife767@gmail.com>
wrote:

On Mon, 23 Oct 2006 00:57:33 -0400, The Re'vr''ddd =

<reniggade@anglikkkoon.com.za> wrote:

On Sun, 22 Oct 2006 20:31:01 GMT, Strife767 <strife767@gmail.com>
wrote:

On Sun, 22 Oct 2006 08:35:00 -0400, The Re'vr''ddd =3D

<reniggade@anglikkkoon.com.za> wrote:

On Sun, 22 Oct 2006 03:52:50 GMT, Strife767 <strife767@gmail.com>
wrote:

On Sat, 21 Oct 2006 23:30:18 -0400, The Re'vr''ddd =3D3D

<reniggade@anglikkkoon.com.za> wrote:

On Sat, 21 Oct 2006 21:31:37 GMT, Strife767 <strife767@gmail.com>
wrote:

On Sat, 21 Oct 2006 16:00:07 -0400, The Re'vr''ddd =3D3D3D

<reniggade@anglikkkoon.com.za> wrote:

On Sat, 21 Oct 2006 17:27:18 GMT, Strife767 <strife767@gmail.com=

wrote:

On Sat, 21 Oct 2006 10:28:32 -0400, The Re'vr''ddd
<reniggade@anglikkkoon.com.za> wrote:

On Sat, 21 Oct 2006 05:53:14 GMT, Strife767 <strife767@gmail.c=

om=3D

wrote:

On Sat, 21 Oct 2006 00:13:36 -0400, The Re'vr''ddd
<reniggade@anglikkkoon.com.za> wrote:

On Fri, 20 Oct 2006 19:25:47 GMT, Strife767 <strife767@gmail=

.c=3D

om=3D3D

wrote:

On Fri, 20 Oct 2006 14:53:47 -0400, The Re'vr''ddd
<reniggade@anglikkkoon.com.za> wrote:

On Fri, 20 Oct 2006 17:32:44 GMT, Strife767 <strife767@gma=

il=3D

.c=3D3D

om=3D3D3D

wrote:

On Fri, 20 Oct 2006 04:24:18 -0400, The Re'vr''ddd
<reniggade@anglikkkoon.com.za> wrote:

On Fri, 20 Oct 2006 01:12:00 -0700, --sexkitten--
<jumpingbeanazNOSPAM@hotmail.com> wrote:

DoD wrote:

"--sexkitten--" <jumpingbeanazNOSPAM@hotmail.com> wrot=

e =3D

in=3D3D

message
news:JrednS29SqIZ-aXYnZ2dnUVZ_qadnZ2d@giganews.com...

DoD wrote:

"--sexkitten--" <jumpingbeanazNOSPAM@hotmail.com> wr=

ot=3D

e =3D3D

in=3D3D3D

message
news:auidnRwgSOza_KXYnZ2dnUVZ_sCdnZ2d@giganews.com..=

DoD wrote:

"--sexkitten--" <jumpingbeanazNOSPAM@hotmail.com> =

wr=3D

ot=3D3D

e =3D3D3D

Why do you need a natural heir?
Be specific.

Are you stupid or something?

Great Reason! Wow, that was an incredibly specific =

an=3D

detailed
response!
</sarcasm>

You asked a stewpid question.... What can I say?

If it was all that stupid you would have had an answe=

r.=3D

Y=3D3D

ou=3D3D3D

didn't.

I did... It was..... Are you stupid or something?

Which was not an answer. Spell it out: why do you NEED =

a =3D

na=3D3D

tu=3D3D3D

ral

heir?
Be specific.
<remaining ad hom cut>

Would you want someone else's (illegitimate) brat inheri=

ti=3D

ng=3D3D

y=3D3D3D

our

money (if any)?

And then pro-lifers wonder why pro-choicers describe thei=

philosophy
as
"life begins at conception and ends at birth."

That's just inane.

Yes, "pro-life-ism" is pretty ridiculous.

Pro-deathism is much worse.

Good thing it doesn't exist. :)

It's euphemistically referred to as "pro-choice".

In your perverted dreams.

Pro-choice =3D3D3D3D pro-abortion

Wrong. Forcing women to abort is no better than forcing them not =

to=3D

. =3D3D

Is =3D3D

=3D3D3D
=3D3D3D

LOL

Okay, first of all, get a newsreader from this decade. "Forte Free =

=3D

Agent=3D3D
=3D3D

1.11/32.235" is obviously not cutting it--look at all those random =

=3D

equal=3D3D
=3D3D

signs it spewed all over the place.

It only seems to do that for your posts.

Newsreaders from this decade don't do it. Forte is up to Agent 4 now.=

St=3D
op =3D

making excuses--put that dial-up connection to use.

As I said, it only seems to happen with your posts.

No one else has fucked up any post of mine that much, therefore it's muc=
h =

more likely that the culprit is your newsreader, which _is_ many years o=
ld.

Nobody else's posts come through fucked up like yours.
It's far more likely that the culprit is you, who are only 22 years
old.

Learn to use your newsreader properly, *****.

lol

Perhaps I could make an exception for ***** foetuses.

lol, as if it's your decision.

I could make it my political platform.

LOL, I'd _love_ to see how many votes you'd get with a platform like =

tha=3D
t. =3D

You might as well try to bring slavery and Prohibition back too, whil=

e =

=3D

you're at it.

You have a problem with aborting ***** foetuses?

If you think I'd be the only one, then go ahead and try running a =

political platform on that, and see what the results are. :)

Do you think ***** foetuses (once we're able to identify them) will
deserve "protected species" treatment, then?

Abortion should be mandatory for those.

In your dreams, silly bigot.

Why would you have a problem with such a pro-death stance, silly
*****?

Because I have a working brain?

I doubt it.

No one cares what bigots like you think--except other bigots. :)

No one cares what faggots like you think - except other faggots.

the concept of "choice" that foreign to you? Pro-choice =3D3D3D3D=

it'=3D

s up=3D3D

to =3D3D

t=3D3D3D
he =3D3D3D

pregnant woman to decide and it's no one else's business.

She's already made her choice when she opened her legs.

And there's no reason for her not to be able to continue making cho=

ic=3D

es =3D

=3D3D
=3D3D

about her own body after that.

The only choice available has been made before conception. Nature
has taken over.

No, it's actually pretty easy to end a pregnancy, especially early on=

. =

T=3D
he =3D

choice is always there, whether you like it or not. :)

It's pretty easy to end any life.

Embryos/fetuses are not human beings. 'Killing' them is no better or wor=
se =

than 'killing' a few million sperm cells by masturbating.

Take a look at a 24 week-old (dead) foetus and try again, *****.

And what's with all the smileys, *****?

Your idiocy is hilarious--but admittedly, it's getting a bit monotonous.=
=

It's far more likely that you're autistic/retarded. Such people tend
to smile a lot.

It's almost killfile time for you, bigot--fair warning. :)

You mean you're about to take the coward's way out, *****?
Why does that not surprise me?

=3D3D3D3D pro-death

If you believe abortion is murder, you believe that the 'death' o=

f =3D

an=3D3D

=3D3D3D

embryo is equivalent to any other death.

Logic failure!

Explain how abortion could possibly be considered murder without th=

at=3D

=3D3D

prerequisite. Murder is a term applied to human beings only. For =3D=

abortio=3D3D
n =3D3D

to be considered murder, an embryo/fetus has to be considered a hum=

an=3D

=3D3D

being. Otherwise the term "murder" just doesn't fit.

I don't generally use the term "murder" in this context. I prefer
"killing".

"Killing" an embryo is no worse than "killing" millions of sperm cell=

s =

b=3D
y =3D

masturbating. *shrugs*

***** 'logic'. Dismissed.

lol

A typical ***** non-response.
<snigger>

Therefore, you believe that eve=3D3D3D
ry =3D3D3D

woman who has a miscarriage (one fifth of pregnancies end in =3D=

miscarriage=3D3D3D
, =3D3D3D

mind you) is guilty of involuntary manslaughter (a.k.a. =3D3D3D

unintentional/accidental murder). Right?

Wrong. Compounded logic failure.

Are you just making terms up now?

Comprehension failure too?

"Compounded logic failure" turns up zero results on Google. And =

"compoun=3D
d =3D

logic" seems to have no meaning other than in the context of =3D

electronics/computer logic.

lol, can you even _define_ a "compounded logic failure?" Who do you =

thin=3D
k =3D

you're kidding?

As I said, comprehension failure.

You can't define it, can you? :)

I don't need to, *****. It's self-evident. Learn English, for
*****'s sake.

Hint: don't use Google as a dictionary/thesaurus.

I used onelook.net also, which is a compilation of several _dozen_ =

dictionaries. Dumbass.

And you still can't understand it, cretin?
Hint: dictionaries are best used for definitions of words not
phrases.

Pro-life =3D3D3D3D anti-abortion.

And thus taking away the right of a pregnant woman to decide what=

=3D

=3D3D

happen=3D3D3D
s =3D3D3D

to her own body. Keep your nose out of women's uteruses--they're =

no=3D

ne=3D3D

=3D3D

of=3D3D3D
=3D3D3D

your business.

The cunts make it my business when they open their legs.

lol

Please explain how every woman's sex life is somehow _your_ busines=

s.=3D

(this should be good)

I make it my business.

Sorry, doesn't work that way. You can think that all you want, but yo=

u =

=3D

can't enforce it. Tough luck for you, control-freak. :)

They've put it in the public domain themselves.

How so? Medical records are not public.

Sex isn't about medical records.

That's how it works.

lol, no, it's not.

You bet it is.

Please explain why you 'think' abortion should be a ***** issue.

(this should be even better)

What? lol, I don't think that. I think it's no one's issue but the =3D=

pregnant women's, and only of their own pregnancies. Simple as that.

Why are you even discussing abortion, then, *****?

Because dumbfucks like you think you have the right to make a woman's =

choice for her, and in light of the fact that pro-lifers have already lo=
st =

that 'battle,' it's fun to poke your logic full of holes while you play =
=

the part of the sore loser. :)

It's not something that has any relevance whatsoever to you, *****.
You couldn't poke a hole in a paper bag.
.

User: "Strife767"
Title: Re: Rabbis: Jerusalem Gay Parade May Lead to War	24 Oct 2006 08:32:04 PM

On Tue, 24 Oct 2006 07:49:31 -0400, The Re'vr''ddd =
<reniggade@anglikkkoon.com.za> wrote:

On Mon, 23 Oct 2006 23:01:09 GMT, Strife767 <strife767@gmail.com>
wrote:

On Mon, 23 Oct 2006 00:57:33 -0400, The Re'vr''ddd =3D

<reniggade@anglikkkoon.com.za> wrote:

On Sun, 22 Oct 2006 20:31:01 GMT, Strife767 <strife767@gmail.com>
wrote:

On Sun, 22 Oct 2006 08:35:00 -0400, The Re'vr''ddd =3D3D

<reniggade@anglikkkoon.com.za> wrote:

On Sun, 22 Oct 2006 03:52:50 GMT, Strife767 <strife767@gmail.com>
wrote:

On Sat, 21 Oct 2006 23:30:18 -0400, The Re'vr''ddd =3D3D3D

<reniggade@anglikkkoon.com.za> wrote:

On Sat, 21 Oct 2006 21:31:37 GMT, Strife767 <strife767@gmail.com=

wrote:

On Sat, 21 Oct 2006 16:00:07 -0400, The Re'vr''ddd =3D3D3D3D

<reniggade@anglikkkoon.com.za> wrote:

On Sat, 21 Oct 2006 17:27:18 GMT, Strife767 <strife767@gmail.c=

om=3D

wrote:

On Sat, 21 Oct 2006 10:28:32 -0400, The Re'vr''ddd
<reniggade@anglikkkoon.com.za> wrote:

On Sat, 21 Oct 2006 05:53:14 GMT, Strife767 <strife767@gmail=

..c=3D

om=3D3D

wrote:

On Sat, 21 Oct 2006 00:13:36 -0400, The Re'vr''ddd
<reniggade@anglikkkoon.com.za> wrote:

On Fri, 20 Oct 2006 19:25:47 GMT, Strife767 <strife767@gma=

il=3D

.c=3D3D

om=3D3D3D

wrote:

On Fri, 20 Oct 2006 14:53:47 -0400, The Re'vr''ddd
<reniggade@anglikkkoon.com.za> wrote:

On Fri, 20 Oct 2006 17:32:44 GMT, Strife767 <strife767@g=

ma=3D

il=3D3D

.c=3D3D3D

om=3D3D3D3D

wrote:

On Fri, 20 Oct 2006 04:24:18 -0400, The Re'vr''ddd
<reniggade@anglikkkoon.com.za> wrote:

On Fri, 20 Oct 2006 01:12:00 -0700, --sexkitten--
<jumpingbeanazNOSPAM@hotmail.com> wrote:

DoD wrote:

"--sexkitten--" <jumpingbeanazNOSPAM@hotmail.com> wr=

ot=3D

e =3D3D

in=3D3D3D

message
news:JrednS29SqIZ-aXYnZ2dnUVZ_qadnZ2d@giganews.com..=

DoD wrote:

"--sexkitten--" <jumpingbeanazNOSPAM@hotmail.com> =

wr=3D

ot=3D3D

e =3D3D3D

in=3D3D3D3D

message
news:auidnRwgSOza_KXYnZ2dnUVZ_sCdnZ2d@giganews.com=

...=3D

DoD wrote:

"--sexkitten--" <jumpingbeanazNOSPAM@hotmail.com=

=3D

wr=3D3D

ot=3D3D3D

e =3D3D3D3D

Why do you need a natural heir?
Be specific.

Are you stupid or something?

Great Reason! Wow, that was an incredibly specifi=

c =3D

an=3D3D

detailed
response!
</sarcasm>

You asked a stewpid question.... What can I say?

If it was all that stupid you would have had an ans=

we=3D

r.=3D3D

Y=3D3D3D

ou=3D3D3D3D

didn't.

I did... It was..... Are you stupid or something?

Which was not an answer. Spell it out: why do you NEE=

D =3D

a =3D3D

na=3D3D3D

tu=3D3D3D3D

ral

heir?
Be specific.
<remaining ad hom cut>

Would you want someone else's (illegitimate) brat inhe=

ri=3D

ti=3D3D

ng=3D3D3D

y=3D3D3D3D

our

money (if any)?

And then pro-lifers wonder why pro-choicers describe th=

ei=3D

philosophy
as
"life begins at conception and ends at birth."

That's just inane.

Yes, "pro-life-ism" is pretty ridiculous.

Pro-deathism is much worse.

Good thing it doesn't exist. :)

It's euphemistically referred to as "pro-choice".

In your perverted dreams.

Pro-choice =3D3D3D3D3D pro-abortion

Wrong. Forcing women to abort is no better than forcing them no=

t =3D

to=3D3D

. =3D3D3D

Is =3D3D3D

=3D3D3D3D
=3D3D3D3D

LOL

Okay, first of all, get a newsreader from this decade. "Forte Fre=

e =3D

=3D3D

Agent=3D3D3D
=3D3D3D

1.11/32.235" is obviously not cutting it--look at all those rando=

m =3D

=3D3D

equal=3D3D3D
=3D3D3D

signs it spewed all over the place.

It only seems to do that for your posts.

Newsreaders from this decade don't do it. Forte is up to Agent 4 no=

w.=3D

=3D

St=3D3D
op =3D3D

making excuses--put that dial-up connection to use.

As I said, it only seems to happen with your posts.

No one else has fucked up any post of mine that much, therefore it's =

muc=3D
h =3D

more likely that the culprit is your newsreader, which _is_ many year=

s =

o=3D
ld.

Nobody else's

Get a newsreader from this decade.

Learn to use your newsreader properly, *****.

lol

Perhaps I could make an exception for ***** foetuses.

lol, as if it's your decision.

I could make it my political platform.

LOL, I'd _love_ to see how many votes you'd get with a platform lik=

e =3D

=3D

tha=3D3D
t. =3D3D

You might as well try to bring slavery and Prohibition back too, wh=

il=3D

e =3D

=3D3D

you're at it.

You have a problem with aborting ***** foetuses?

If you think I'd be the only one, then go ahead and try running a =3D=

political platform on that, and see what the results are. :)

Do you think ***** foetuses (once we're able to identify them) will
deserve "protected species" treatment, then?

lol

Abortion should be mandatory for those.

In your dreams, silly bigot.

Why would you have a problem with such a pro-death stance, silly
*****?

Because I have a working brain?

I doubt it.

No one cares what bigots like you think--except other bigots. :)

No one cares what faggots like you think - except other faggots.

lol, wrong again. There are more pro-gay heterosexuals than there are =
homosexuals total. :)

the concept of "choice" that foreign to you? Pro-choice =3D3D3D=

3D3D=3D

it'=3D3D

s up=3D3D3D

to =3D3D3D

t=3D3D3D3D
he =3D3D3D3D

pregnant woman to decide and it's no one else's business.

She's already made her choice when she opened her legs.

And there's no reason for her not to be able to continue making c=

ho=3D

ic=3D3D

es =3D3D

=3D3D3D
=3D3D3D

about her own body after that.

The only choice available has been made before conception. Natur=

has taken over.

No, it's actually pretty easy to end a pregnancy, especially early =

on=3D

. =3D

T=3D3D
he =3D3D

choice is always there, whether you like it or not. :)

It's pretty easy to end any life.

Embryos/fetuses are not human beings. 'Killing' them is no better or =

wor=3D
se =3D

than 'killing' a few million sperm cells by masturbating.

Take a look at a 24 week-old (dead) foetus and try again, *****.

lol, six months?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:UKAbortionbyGestationalAgeChart2004.p=
ng
Wow, 1% of abortions. XD Any abortions at that time are done only in =
emergencies. The vast majority are done before the two month mark, when =
=
the embryo is at best a whole _centimeter_ long. Not much to look at, =
frankly--it'd be hard to even _find_. There are more gruesome images on =
=
the daily news--or in a raw egg.

And what's with all the smileys, *****?

Your idiocy is hilarious--but admittedly, it's getting a bit =
monotonous.=3D
=3D

It's far more likely that you're autistic/retarded.

lol, whatever you say, closet case.

Such people tend
to smile a lot.

Hint: no one takes you seriously.

It's almost killfile time for you, bigot--fair warning. :)

You mean you're about to take the coward's way out, *****?

Don't speak as if you have anything to say. You're nothing. Just a bigot=
=
who's being a sore loser. Your side lost already. Get over it, *****. :)=

=3D3D3D3D3D pro-death

If you believe abortion is murder, you believe that the 'death'=

o=3D

f =3D3D

an=3D3D3D

=3D3D3D3D

embryo is equivalent to any other death.

Logic failure!

Explain how abortion could possibly be considered murder without =

th=3D

at=3D3D

=3D3D3D

prerequisite. Murder is a term applied to human beings only. For =

=3D3D=3D

abortio=3D3D3D
n =3D3D3D

to be considered murder, an embryo/fetus has to be considered a h=

um=3D

an=3D3D

=3D3D3D

being. Otherwise the term "murder" just doesn't fit.

I don't generally use the term "murder" in this context. I prefer=
"killing".

"Killing" an embryo is no worse than "killing" millions of sperm ce=

ll=3D

s =3D

b=3D3D
y =3D3D

masturbating. *shrugs*

***** 'logic'. Dismissed.

lol

A typical ***** non-response.
<snigger>

Typical homophobic closet gay. :)
http://content.apa.org/journals/abn/105/3/440

Therefore, you believe that eve=3D3D3D3D
ry =3D3D3D3D

woman who has a miscarriage (one fifth of pregnancies end in =3D=

3D=3D

miscarriage=3D3D3D3D
, =3D3D3D3D

mind you) is guilty of involuntary manslaughter (a.k.a. =3D3D3=

D3D

unintentional/accidental murder). Right?

Wrong. Compounded logic failure.

Are you just making terms up now?

Comprehension failure too?

"Compounded logic failure" turns up zero results on Google. And =3D=

"compoun=3D3D
d =3D3D

logic" seems to have no meaning other than in the context of =3D3D=

electronics/computer logic.

lol, can you even _define_ a "compounded logic failure?" Who do you=

=3D

thin=3D3D
k =3D3D

you're kidding?

As I said, comprehension failure.

You can't define it, can you? :)

I don't need to, *****.

In other words, you can't. Thanks, I'll put that on the pile of dumb shi=
t =
you type.

It's self-evident. Learn English, for
*****'s sake.

You mean the same English whose dictionaries don't contain the term you =
=
made up? lol, interesting idea of English you have.

Hint: don't use Google as a dictionary/thesaurus.

I used onelook.net also, which is a compilation of several _dozen_ =3D=

dictionaries. Dumbass.

And you still can't understand it, cretin?

How am I supposed to understand terminology of your own invention? lol, =
=
you idiot.

Hint: dictionaries are best used for definitions of words not
phrases.

http://www.onelook.com/?w=3Dstream+of+consciousness
http://www.onelook.com/?w=3Dseparation+of+church+and+state
Phrases longer than yours that appear. Sorry, wrong again, dumbass.

Pro-life =3D3D3D3D3D anti-abortion.

And thus taking away the right of a pregnant woman to decide wh=

at=3D

=3D3D

=3D3D3D

happen=3D3D3D3D
s =3D3D3D3D

to her own body. Keep your nose out of women's uteruses--they'r=

e =3D

no=3D3D

ne=3D3D3D

=3D3D3D

of=3D3D3D3D
=3D3D3D3D

your business.

The cunts make it my business when they open their legs.

lol

Please explain how every woman's sex life is somehow _your_ busin=

es=3D

s.=3D3D

(this should be good)

I make it my business.

Sorry, doesn't work that way. You can think that all you want, but =

yo=3D

u =3D

=3D3D

can't enforce it. Tough luck for you, control-freak. :)

They've put it in the public domain themselves.

How so? Medical records are not public.

Sex isn't about medical records.

lol, so explain how exactly one's sex life is "public domain."

That's how it works.

lol, no, it's not.

You bet it is.

lol

Please explain why you 'think' abortion should be a ***** issue.

(this should be even better)

What? lol, I don't think that. I think it's no one's issue but the =

=3D3D=3D

pregnant women's, and only of their own pregnancies. Simple as that=

Why are you even discussing abortion, then, *****?

Because dumbfucks like you think you have the right to make a woman's=

=3D

choice for her, and in light of the fact that pro-lifers have already=

lo=3D
st =3D

that 'battle,' it's fun to poke your logic full of holes while you pl=

ay =

=3D
=3D

the part of the sore loser. :)

It's not something that has any relevance whatsoever to you, *****.
You couldn't poke a hole in a paper bag.

Awww, do I hear sniveling?
You're just entertainment. Face it. Dipshits like you lost this debate a=
=
l-o-n-g time ago--the best reaction you can get from your whining is =
rolled eyes. :)
-- =
____________ _____________ __________________
__ ___/_ /__________(_)__ __/____/__ /_ ___/__ /
_____ \_ __/_ ___/_ /__ /_ _ _ \_ /_ __ \__ /
____/ // /_ _ / _ / _ __/ / __/ / / /_/ /_ /
/____/ \__/ /_/ /_/ /_/ \___//_/ \____/ /_/
Skeptic, atheist...and somehow an optimist. Go figure.
I want to change the world.
.

User: "Free Lunch"
Title: Re: Rabbis: Jerusalem Gay Parade May Lead to War	21 Oct 2006 03:14:23 PM

On Sat, 21 Oct 2006 20:00:07 GMT, in alt.atheism
reniggade@anglikkkoon.com.za (The Re'vr''ddd) wrote in
<453a7bf1.21178442@news.onetel.net.uk>:

On Sat, 21 Oct 2006 17:27:18 GMT, Strife767 <strife767@gmail.com>
wrote:

On Sat, 21 Oct 2006 10:28:32 -0400, The Re'vr''ddd
<reniggade@anglikkkoon.com.za> wrote:

....

It's euphemistically referred to as "pro-choice".

In your perverted dreams.

Pro-choice = pro-abortion = pro-death

Pro-life = anti-abortion.

Easy, isn't it?

Easy, simple and wrong.
Congratulations.
.

User: ""
Title: Re: Rabbis: Jerusalem Gay Parade May Lead to War	20 Oct 2006 07:53:52 PM

Strife767 wrote:

On Fri, 20 Oct 2006 04:24:18 -0400, The Re'vr''ddd
<reniggade@anglikkkoon.com.za> wrote:

On Fri, 20 Oct 2006 01:12:00 -0700, --sexkitten--
<jumpingbeanazNOSPAM@hotmail.com> wrote:

DoD wrote:

"--sexkitten--" <jumpingbeanazNOSPAM@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:JrednS29SqIZ-aXYnZ2dnUVZ_qadnZ2d@giganews.com...

DoD wrote:

"--sexkitten--" <jumpingbeanazNOSPAM@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:auidnRwgSOza_KXYnZ2dnUVZ_sCdnZ2d@giganews.com...

DoD wrote:

"--sexkitten--" <jumpingbeanazNOSPAM@hotmail.com> wrote in

Why do you need a natural heir?
Be specific.

Are you stupid or something?

Great Reason! Wow, that was an incredibly specific and detailed
response!
</sarcasm>

You asked a stewpid question.... What can I say?

If it was all that stupid you would have had an answer. You didn't.

I did... It was..... Are you stupid or something?

Which was not an answer. Spell it out: why do you NEED a natural heir?
Be specific.
<remaining ad hom cut>

Would you want someone else's (illegitimate) brat inheriting your
money (if any)?

And then pro-lifers wonder why pro-choicers describe their philosophy as
"life begins at conception and ends at birth."

All life begins at the moment of conception. That's how we all got
here,
whether it's a spider or a human being and all unborn children are
human
life with the right to be born and only idiots like you and those who
have
turned abortion into the racket it has become think otherwise. You
appear
to think that because some stoned to the gills made the above stupid
statement it is fact. *All* children are provided for in todays
society.
Most nations are welfare states including the U.S. and no child,
unless it
is being raised by parents who should be in jail is in need except in
the 3rd
world and no amount of advice and money is going to help them, they
are
unable to grasp any facet of birth control or the simple facts of
civilisation.
Many of these aborted children are torn limb from limb from the womb,
some as late as 6 months. Many are born alive and then killed by
these
so-called "doctors" you so admire. Why were *you* allowed to live?
This
planet would be better off without those who think like you and the
Godless
braindead, dopehead Carlin.
snip yet one more daft drawing. He's barking mad.

Skeptic, atheist...and somehow an optimist. Go figure.

Duh.

I want to change the world.

So leave it.
.

User: "--sexkitten--"
Title: Re: Rabbis: Jerusalem Gay Parade May Lead to War	20 Oct 2006 08:34:08 PM

wrote:

Strife767 wrote:

On Fri, 20 Oct 2006 04:24:18 -0400, The Re'vr''ddd
<reniggade@anglikkkoon.com.za> wrote:

On Fri, 20 Oct 2006 01:12:00 -0700, --sexkitten--
<jumpingbeanazNOSPAM@hotmail.com> wrote:

DoD wrote:

"--sexkitten--" <jumpingbeanazNOSPAM@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:JrednS29SqIZ-aXYnZ2dnUVZ_qadnZ2d@giganews.com...

DoD wrote:

"--sexkitten--" <jumpingbeanazNOSPAM@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:auidnRwgSOza_KXYnZ2dnUVZ_sCdnZ2d@giganews.com...

DoD wrote:

"--sexkitten--" <jumpingbeanazNOSPAM@hotmail.com> wrote in

Why do you need a natural heir?
Be specific.

Are you stupid or something?

Great Reason! Wow, that was an incredibly specific and detailed
response!
</sarcasm>

You asked a stewpid question.... What can I say?

If it was all that stupid you would have had an answer. You didn't.

I did... It was..... Are you stupid or something?

Which was not an answer. Spell it out: why do you NEED a natural heir?
Be specific.
<remaining ad hom cut>

Would you want someone else's (illegitimate) brat inheriting your
money (if any)?

And then pro-lifers wonder why pro-choicers describe their philosophy as
"life begins at conception and ends at birth."

All life begins at the moment of conception.

Really.
Sperm and ova are...dead?
<garbage snipped>
--
--sexkitten--
"If you want to go backwards, you put it in 'R,' and if you want to go
forward, you put it in 'D'"
-- Sen. Tom Harkin (D-IA)
.

User: "Lars Eighner"
Title: Re: Rabbis: Jerusalem Gay Parade May Lead to War	20 Oct 2006 09:02:41 PM

In our last episode, <1161392032.825022.42260@e3g2000cwe.googlegroups.com>,
the lovely and talented

broadcast on alt.atheism:

All life begins at the moment of conception.

*****. The sperm is alive before conception. The ovum is
alive before conception. Life doesn't begin at the moment of
conception. The sperm, the fetus, the ovum all are human tissue,
just like warts and cancers, and deserving of the same protections
afforded bunions, moles, and foreskins..

That's how we all got here, whether it's a spider or a human being and all
unborn children

There is no such thing as an unborn child.

*All* children are provided for in todays society.

Liar.
--
Lars Eighner <http://larseighner.com/> <http://myspace.com/larseighner>
While seeking revenge, dig two graves - one for yourself.
- Doug Horton
.

User: ""
Title: Re: Rabbis: Jerusalem Gay Parade May Lead to War	22 Oct 2006 12:58:56 AM

On 20-Oct-2006, Lars Eighner <usenet@larseighner.com> wrote:

In our last episode,
<1161392032.825022.42260@e3g2000cwe.googlegroups.com>,
the lovely and talented

broadcast on alt.atheism:

*All* children are provided for in todays society.

Liar.

Like all igots, she has her own language.
By "provided" she doubtless means "treated as bigot think they should be."
Susan
.

User: "Benjie"
Title: Re: Rabbis: Jerusalem Gay Parade May Lead to War	22 Oct 2006 01:44:34 AM

<flaviaR@verizon.net> wrote in message news:AMD_g.1071$GJ.589@trnddc07...

On 20-Oct-2006, Lars Eighner <usenet@larseighner.com> wrote:

In our last episode,
<1161392032.825022.42260@e3g2000cwe.googlegroups.com>,
the lovely and talented

broadcast on alt.atheism:

*All* children are provided for in todays society.

Liar.

Like all igots, she has her own language.
By "provided" she doubtless means "treated as bigot think they should be."

What means "igots", you thick Irish *****?
Should have been an "s" after "bigot" in your post too, dopey.
.

User: "Strife767"
Title: Re: Rabbis: Jerusalem Gay Parade May Lead to War	21 Oct 2006 01:10:05 AM

On Fri, 20 Oct 2006 20:53:52 -0400,

>
wrote:

Strife767 wrote:

On Fri, 20 Oct 2006 04:24:18 -0400, The Re'vr''ddd
<reniggade@anglikkkoon.com.za> wrote:

On Fri, 20 Oct 2006 01:12:00 -0700, --sexkitten--
<jumpingbeanazNOSPAM@hotmail.com> wrote:

DoD wrote:

"--sexkitten--" <jumpingbeanazNOSPAM@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:JrednS29SqIZ-aXYnZ2dnUVZ_qadnZ2d@giganews.com...

DoD wrote:

"--sexkitten--" <jumpingbeanazNOSPAM@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:auidnRwgSOza_KXYnZ2dnUVZ_sCdnZ2d@giganews.com...

DoD wrote:

"--sexkitten--" <jumpingbeanazNOSPAM@hotmail.com> wrote in

Why do you need a natural heir?
Be specific.

Are you stupid or something?

Great Reason! Wow, that was an incredibly specific and detailed
response!
</sarcasm>

You asked a stewpid question.... What can I say?

If it was all that stupid you would have had an answer. You didn't.

I did... It was..... Are you stupid or something?

Which was not an answer. Spell it out: why do you NEED a natural

heir?

Be specific.
<remaining ad hom cut>

Would you want someone else's (illegitimate) brat inheriting your
money (if any)?

And then pro-lifers wonder why pro-choicers describe their philosophy as
"life begins at conception and ends at birth."

All life begins at the moment of conception.

LOL, okay, dumbass, answer me this then: why don't you pro-lifers consider
a child who was just born to be nine months old, or celebrate his/her
first birthday three months after birth?
Just one example of how obvious your hypocrisy is. Here's another:
If you say that abortion is murder, then that would mean you believe that
the 'death' of an embryo/fetus is equivalent to the death of someone after
birth.
Therefore, explain to me why it is that a woman who has a miscarriage is
not, in your opinion, guilty of involuntary manslaughter (a.k.a.
unintentional murder).
Not that I don't know the answers already--it's because you don't really
believe in these things you say--they're just a smokescreen for your
sexism. You dumbasses aren't pro-life, you're anti-woman, plain and
simple. It's glaringly obvious.
P.S. One fifth of pregnancies end in miscarriage.

*All* children are provided for in todays
society.
Most nations are welfare states including the U.S.

It's so pathetic for you to think that financial assistance is any
substitute for a stable, loving family.

Many of these aborted children are torn limb from limb from the womb,

Only in your sick fantasies. I defy you to provide a single case of this
ever actually happening.

some as late as 6 months.

"Some" police officers take bribes and are corrupt. Well, guess we just
have to do away with the police force, as per your logic.
Please, lol. Who do you think you're kidding?

Many are born alive and then killed by
these
so-called "doctors" you so admire.

LOL! Again, I defy you to cite a single case of the above happening
outside of your depraved mind.

Why were *you* allowed to live?

Ask my parents. It was their choice, not mine.

This
planet would be better off without those who think like you and the
Godless
braindead, dopehead Carlin.

Do I hear whimpering? Going to pick up your toys and go home now? Poor
baby can't deal with little old me. *mockwipes eyes* What am I, like half
your age? Less?

Skeptic, atheist...and somehow an optimist. Go figure.

Duh.

I see your creativity has completely run dry at this point.

I want to change the world.

So leave it.

LOL, you sad, sad person. My generation will shed no tears at seeing your
antiquated ideals be reduced to nothing. :)
--
____________ _____________ __________________
__ ___/_ /__________(_)__ __/____/__ /_ ___/__ /
_____ \_ __/_ ___/_ /__ /_ _ _ \_ /_ __ \__ /
____/ // /_ _ / _ / _ __/ / __/ / / /_/ /_ /
/____/ \__/ /_/ /_/ /_/ \___//_/ \____/ /_/
Skeptic, atheist...and somehow an optimist. Go figure.
I want to change the world.
.

User: "Strife767"
Title: Re: Rabbis: Jerusalem Gay Parade May Lead to War	20 Oct 2006 12:24:37 PM

On Fri, 20 Oct 2006 01:46:15 -0400, DoD <thecats@ss.mil> wrote:

"--sexkitten--" <jumpingbeanazNOSPAM@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:auidnRwgSOza_KXYnZ2dnUVZ_sCdnZ2d@giganews.com...

DoD wrote:

"--sexkitten--" <jumpingbeanazNOSPAM@hotmail.com> wrote in

Why do you need a natural heir?
Be specific.

Are you stupid or something?

Great Reason! Wow, that was an incredibly specific and detailed
response!
</sarcasm>

You asked a stewpid question.... What can I say?

Believe me, you already say plenty about yourself by calling it a stupid
question. :)
--
____________ _____________ __________________
__ ___/_ /__________(_)__ __/____/__ /_ ___/__ /
_____ \_ __/_ ___/_ /__ /_ _ _ \_ /_ __ \__ /
____/ // /_ _ / _ / _ __/ / __/ / / /_/ /_ /
/____/ \__/ /_/ /_/ /_/ \___//_/ \____/ /_/
Skeptic, atheist...and somehow an optimist. Go figure.
I want to change the world.
.

User: "DoD"
Title: Re: Rabbis: Jerusalem Gay Parade May Lead to War	20 Oct 2006 01:03:44 PM

"Strife767" <strife767@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:op.thqdbb1u5i5s70@chris...

On Fri, 20 Oct 2006 01:46:15 -0400, DoD > > You asked a stewpid

question.... What can I say?

Believe me, you already say plenty about yourself by calling it a stupid
question. :)

It is a stupid question. Are you gonna start playing stewpid now?
<snip stewpid sig>
.

User: "Strife767"
Title: Re: Rabbis: Jerusalem Gay Parade May Lead to War	20 Oct 2006 12:23:40 PM

On Fri, 20 Oct 2006 01:17:45 -0400, DoD <thecats@ss.mil> wrote:

"--sexkitten--" <jumpingbeanazNOSPAM@hotmail.com> wrote in

Why do you need a natural heir?
Be specific.

Are you stupid or something?

Families are no longer chattle--the _necessity_ of having natural children
is practically non-existent in the modern day. That is, unless you're a
racist/supremacist who has worries about "contamination" of your
oh-so-precious lineage, while it is proven that 'mixing it up' genetically
naturally makes for a stronger gene pool.
--
____________ _____________ __________________
__ ___/_ /__________(_)__ __/____/__ /_ ___/__ /
_____ \_ __/_ ___/_ /__ /_ _ _ \_ /_ __ \__ /
____/ // /_ _ / _ / _ __/ / __/ / / /_/ /_ /
/____/ \__/ /_/ /_/ /_/ \___//_/ \____/ /_/
Skeptic, atheist...and somehow an optimist. Go figure.
I want to change the world.
.

User: "DoD"
Title: Re: Rabbis: Jerusalem Gay Parade May Lead to War	20 Oct 2006 01:08:22 PM

"Strife767" <strife767@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:op.thqc9qxi5i5s70@chris...

Families are no longer chattle

Families were never chattle.
--the _necessity_ of having natural children

is practically non-existent in the modern day.

Sure we can all just adopt brats that are left behind by people that just
wanna ***** and don't have the means of raising children...... Stupid
liberals.
That is, unless you're a

racist/supremacist who has worries about "contamination" of your
oh-so-precious lineage,

WTF are you talking about?
while it is proven that 'mixing it up' genetically

naturally makes for a stronger gene pool.

Well duh.... Are you stupid or something?
First rule of genetics, spread the gene pool as you can apart.... Move it
around, Move it around.......
With thanks to Eddie Izzard.......
.

User: "The Revrddd"
Title: Re: Rabbis: Jerusalem Gay Parade May Lead to War	20 Oct 2006 01:59:08 PM

On Fri, 20 Oct 2006 13:08:22 -0500, "DoD" <thecats@ss.mil> wrote:

"Strife767" <strife767@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:op.thqc9qxi5i5s70@chris...

Families are no longer chattle

Families were never chattle.

--the _necessity_ of having natural children

is practically non-existent in the modern day.

Sure we can all just adopt brats that are left behind by people that just
wanna ***** and don't have the means of raising children...... Stupid
liberals.

And those same brats inherit the character deficiencies of their
parents.
And so it goes into the next generation...
.

User: "Strife767"
Title: Re: Rabbis: Jerusalem Gay Parade May Lead to War	20 Oct 2006 01:35:31 PM

On Fri, 20 Oct 2006 14:08:22 -0400, DoD <thecats@ss.mil> wrote:

"Strife767" <strife767@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:op.thqc9qxi5i5s70@chris...

Families are no longer chattle

Families were never chattle.

LOL, wow, someone didn't pay attention in history class.

--the _necessity_ of having natural children
is practically non-existent in the modern day.

Sure we can all just adopt brats that are left behind by people that just
wanna ***** and don't have the means of raising children...... Stupid
liberals.

You haven't said anything that contradicts my statement.

That is, unless you're a
racist/supremacist who has worries about "contamination" of your
oh-so-precious lineage,

WTF are you talking about?

The kind of person who scoffs at the idea of adopting an abandoned child
instead of creating another one.

while it is proven that 'mixing it up' genetically
naturally makes for a stronger gene pool.

Well duh.... Are you stupid or something?

You seem to agree that what I said was correct. So how does it occur that
you would call someone stupid for being right? Do you have an inferiority
complex?
--
____________ _____________ __________________
__ ___/_ /__________(_)__ __/____/__ /_ ___/__ /
_____ \_ __/_ ___/_ /__ /_ _ _ \_ /_ __ \__ /
____/ // /_ _ / _ / _ __/ / __/ / / /_/ /_ /
/____/ \__/ /_/ /_/ /_/ \___//_/ \____/ /_/
Skeptic, atheist...and somehow an optimist. Go figure.
I want to change the world.
.

User: "DoD"
Title: Re: Rabbis: Jerusalem Gay Parade May Lead to War	20 Oct 2006 01:54:56 PM

"Strife767" <strife767@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:op.thqglg195i5s70@chris...

On Fri, 20 Oct 2006 14:08:22 -0400, DoD <thecats@ss.mil> wrote:

"Strife767" <strife767@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:op.thqc9qxi5i5s70@chris...

Families are no longer chattle

Families were never chattle.

LOL, wow, someone didn't pay attention in history class.

Somebody didn't make it into the spelling bee....
C*H*A*T*T*E*L.
And if that is the word you were looking for... It would all depend on
geography and time periods...

--the _necessity_ of having natural children
is practically non-existent in the modern day.

Sure we can all just adopt brats that are left behind by people that

just

wanna ***** and don't have the means of raising children...... Stupid
liberals.

You haven't said anything that contradicts my statement.

"the _necessity_ of having natural children
is practically non-existent in the modern day."
is a pretty moronic statement. What can I say?

That is, unless you're a
racist/supremacist who has worries about "contamination" of your
oh-so-precious lineage,

WTF are you talking about?

The kind of person who scoffs at the idea of adopting an abandoned child
instead of creating another one.

Your sentence structure sucks, but if I am to get your meaning, there is
nothing wrong with adopting a child within or out of your own ethnicity....
But did you have a point with this?
You are almost as dumb as that imam who said that polygamy is the answer to
homosexuals ahd the surplus of women in N.Y. and around the world.
Reference:
http://www.memritv.org/Transcript.asp?P1=1295

while it is proven that 'mixing it up' genetically
naturally makes for a stronger gene pool.

Well duh.... Are you stupid or something?

You seem to agree that what I said was correct.

I didn't say that you were correct at all.
So how does it occur that

you would call someone stupid for being right?

I asked if you were stupid.

Do you have an inferiority
complex?

Nah, I am a pretty cool dude.
.

User: "Strife767"
Title: Re: Rabbis: Jerusalem Gay Parade May Lead to War	20 Oct 2006 02:33:05 PM

On Fri, 20 Oct 2006 14:54:56 -0400, DoD <thecats@ss.mil> wrote:

"Strife767" <strife767@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:op.thqglg195i5s70@chris...

On Fri, 20 Oct 2006 14:08:22 -0400, DoD <thecats@ss.mil> wrote:

"Strife767" <strife767@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:op.thqc9qxi5i5s70@chris...

Families are no longer chattle

Families were never chattle.

LOL, wow, someone didn't pay attention in history class.

Somebody didn't make it into the spelling bee....
C*H*A*T*T*E*L.

Wow, a typo. You're really reduced to jumping on that, huh? Not surprised.

And if that is the word you were looking for... It would all depend on
geography and time periods...

--the _necessity_ of having natural children
is practically non-existent in the modern day.

Sure we can all just adopt brats that are left behind by people that

just

wanna ***** and don't have the means of raising children...... Stupid
liberals.

You haven't said anything that contradicts my statement.

"the _necessity_ of having natural children
is practically non-existent in the modern day."

is a pretty moronic statement. What can I say?

You can't say anything--that's why you try to wave it off without actually
refuting it in any way. :)

That is, unless you're a
racist/supremacist who has worries about "contamination" of your
oh-so-precious lineage,

WTF are you talking about?

The kind of person who scoffs at the idea of adopting an abandoned child
instead of creating another one.

Your sentence structure sucks,

All I left out was the implied "I'm talking about." Other than that, the
sentence is grammatically correct. Is this really all you have to say in
response? I feel sorry for you.

but if I am to get your meaning, there is
nothing wrong with adopting a child within or out of your own
ethnicity....

No, I said nothing about ethnicity at all.
--
____________ _____________ __________________
__ ___/_ /__________(_)__ __/____/__ /_ ___/__ /
_____ \_ __/_ ___/_ /__ /_ _ _ \_ /_ __ \__ /
____/ // /_ _ / _ / _ __/ / __/ / / /_/ /_ /
/____/ \__/ /_/ /_/ /_/ \___//_/ \____/ /_/
Skeptic, atheist...and somehow an optimist. Go figure.
I want to change the world.
.

User: "Demon Lord of Confusion"
Title: Re: Rabbis: Jerusalem Gay Parade May Lead to War	22 Oct 2006 06:35:03 PM

On Fri, 20 Oct 2006 14:51:08 -0500, DoD attempted to confuse the issue
further by squeaking:

"Strife767" wrote...

A word to the wise: No dumping. You only get a bigger x-poast when you
do that.

On Fri, 20 Oct 2006 14:54:56 -0400, DoD wrote:

"Strife767" wrote...

On Fri, 20 Oct 2006 14:08:22 -0400, DoD wrote:

"Strife767" wrote...

Families are no longer chattle

Families were never chattle.

LOL, wow, someone didn't pay attention in history class.

Somebody didn't make it into the spelling bee.... C*H*A*T*T*E*L.

Wow, a typo. You're really reduced to jumping on that, huh? Not
surprised.

I am not surprised that you didn't make it to the spelling bee.

Wives and children were indeed chattel, historically speaking. They
didn't have rights, and could even be bought and sold. This is within
the past few centuries, too, in Europe.

<snip>

"the _necessity_ of having natural children is practically
non-existent in the modern day."

is a pretty moronic statement. What can I say?

You can't say anything--that's why you try to wave it off without
actually refuting it in any way. :)

Ok, so you want to have a bunch of strangers *****, then have all the
married people adopt those kids, instead of having children of their
own...

That's a big ol' straw man. It doesn't resemble Strife's point in even
the remotest way.

Like I said.... your ideas are pretty moronic..

Yours are paleolithic.

That is, unless you're a racist/supremacist who has worries about
"contamination" of your oh-so-precious lineage,

WTF are you talking about?

The kind of person who scoffs at the idea of adopting an abandoned

child

instead of creating another one.

Your sentence structure sucks,

All I left out was the implied "I'm talking about." Other than that,
the sentence is grammatically correct. Is this really all you have to
say in response? I feel sorry for you.

If you kept reading below, then you would have known, that I had more to
say than you sentence structure sucks. And that point still stands
without saying "I'm talking about".....

Your attempt at thinking sucks.

but if I am to get your meaning, there is nothing wrong with adopting
a child within or out of your own ethnicity....

No, I said nothing about ethnicity at all.

Well, I don't know what kind of idiotic point you are trying to get across
then.

It isn't "necessary" to have children of one's own, unless one is
terrified that one's bloodline is becoming "polluted" with genetic
material from non-whites in the rest of the family -- that one's sibs
and cousins are procreating with non-whites, for example. If that isn't
a concern, then adoption is a fine idea. Lots of women wind up bearing
offspring they either don't want or simply can't afford, and weren't
able, for whatever reason, to abort.
--
________________________________________________________________________
Hail Eris! mhm 29x21; TM#5; COOSN-029-06-71069
The God of Odd Statements, the Ugliest Pigfucker In The Universe
Stupidity Takes Its Toll. Please Have Exact Change.
If you never read anything else in any of my sigs, read this:
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/15321167/
http://borealin.livejournal.com/15104.html
Or watch it here:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uqxmPjB0WSs
Then, if you manage to read/watch all that, try this:
http://www.newamericancentury.org/RebuildingAmericasDefenses.pdf
And Molly Ivins had a few choice words to say about it, weeks before:
http://www.truthout.org/docs_2006/092906B.shtml
"Q: What's the difference between the Vietnam War and the Iraq War?
A: George W. Bush had a plan to get out of the Vietnam War." -- Anon.
Thread where outing begins: http://tinyurl.com/hojf8
George Pickett Memorial Trophy, Special Ops Cody Memorial Purple Heart,
and the Order of the Holey Sockpuppet winner <wfh_jr@hotmail.com> on
outing personal contact info in x-poasted subject lines:
"Plenty of people post under their real names and do not attempt to hide
their contact info. You are scared of being 'outed' because you are a
pathological abuser of usenet, and people rightly despise you for it.
You're afraid of being reported to the authorities or, better, visited
by a couple of guys with baseball bats. Other people don't have this
obsessive fear. Ward Hardman himself has posted plenty of personal
information - nothing that anyone else added was hidden in any way.
You're so fucking scared you've built up this whole sick mythology about
different categories of bad dudes who 'out' scum like you.
"Meanwhile you are the ugliest pigfucker in the universe. You are the
coward without ethics. You call me a 'newbie' - ha! what an ***** you
are. Those who want to remain anonymous do so. There is absolutely no
way you could identify me, not unless you had the sort of subpoena power
that only gets turned on for big-time terrorists. That's because I chose
to be anonymous. Some people don't. Only really stupid dicks like you
choose the sort of semi-anonymity which leaves you in constant fear.
"What a dickless wonder you are 'Snarky' you fat *****."
-- in MID: <1156587081.123977.43800@m79g2000cwm.googlegroups.com>
"I am the only one who has outer filthed Ward" -- James C. "Crackhead"
Cracked voluntarily self-immolates, in MID:
1159678991.838385.310840@m7g2000cwm.googlegroups.com
"When I told Abbie Hoffman that he was the first one who made me laugh
since Lenny Bruce died, Hoffman said, "Really? He was my god." The
combination of satirical irreverence and sense of justice that Bruce and
Hoffman shared was the real spirit behind the Yippies--a term I coined to
describe a phenomenon that already existed: an organic coalition of stoned
hippies and political activists who engaged in such actions as throwing
money on the floor of the New York Stock Exchange, then explaining to
reporters the meaning of that symbolism. Folksinger Phil Ochs summed it
up: "A demonstration should turn you on, not turn you off." So when
journalists link the Yippies with misleading bedfellows, at best it's
careless shorthand; at worst it's deliberate demonization. Osama bin Laden
wanted an aircraft to crash into the Pentagon. Abbie Hoffman merely wanted
to levitate it." -- Paul Krassner, http://tinyurl.com/ehu3v
.

User: "The Revrddd"
Title: Re: Rabbis: Jerusalem Gay Parade May Lead to War	20 Oct 2006 11:16:52 PM

On Fri, 20 Oct 2006 19:33:05 GMT, Strife767 <strife767@gmail.com>
wrote:

On Fri, 20 Oct 2006 14:54:56 -0400, DoD <thecats@ss.mil> wrote:

"Strife767" <strife767@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:op.thqglg195i5s70@chris...

On Fri, 20 Oct 2006 14:08:22 -0400, DoD <thecats@ss.mil> wrote:

"Strife767" <strife767@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:op.thqc9qxi5i5s70@chris...

Families are no longer chattle

Families were never chattle.

LOL, wow, someone didn't pay attention in history class.

Somebody didn't make it into the spelling bee....
C*H*A*T*T*E*L.

Wow, a typo. You're really reduced to jumping on that, huh? Not surprised.

That's illiteracy, not a "typo".
.

User: "Strife767"
Title: Re: Rabbis: Jerusalem Gay Parade May Lead to War	21 Oct 2006 01:12:01 AM

On Sat, 21 Oct 2006 00:16:52 -0400, The Re'vr''ddd
<reniggade@anglikkkoon.com.za> wrote:

On Fri, 20 Oct 2006 19:33:05 GMT, Strife767 <strife767@gmail.com>
wrote:

On Fri, 20 Oct 2006 14:54:56 -0400, DoD <thecats@ss.mil> wrote:

"Strife767" <strife767@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:op.thqglg195i5s70@chris...

On Fri, 20 Oct 2006 14:08:22 -0400, DoD <thecats@ss.mil> wrote:

"Strife767" <strife767@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:op.thqc9qxi5i5s70@chris...

Families are no longer chattle

Families were never chattle.

LOL, wow, someone didn't pay attention in history class.

Somebody didn't make it into the spelling bee....
C*H*A*T*T*E*L.

Wow, a typo. You're really reduced to jumping on that, huh? Not
surprised.

That's illiteracy, not a "typo".

Wow--so two letters switched equals illiteracy? You moron.
Don't Google "teh." Your head might explode.
--
____________ _____________ __________________
__ ___/_ /__________(_)__ __/____/__ /_ ___/__ /
_____ \_ __/_ ___/_ /__ /_ _ _ \_ /_ __ \__ /
____/ // /_ _ / _ / _ __/ / __/ / / /_/ /_ /
/____/ \__/ /_/ /_/ /_/ \___//_/ \____/ /_/
Skeptic, atheist...and somehow an optimist. Go figure.
I want to change the world.
.

User: "The Revrddd"
Title: Re: Rabbis: Jerusalem Gay Parade May Lead to War	21 Oct 2006 09:33:34 AM

On Sat, 21 Oct 2006 06:12:01 GMT, Strife767 <strife767@gmail.com>
wrote:

On Sat, 21 Oct 2006 00:16:52 -0400, The Re'vr''ddd
<reniggade@anglikkkoon.com.za> wrote:

On Fri, 20 Oct 2006 19:33:05 GMT, Strife767 <strife767@gmail.com>
wrote:

On Fri, 20 Oct 2006 14:54:56 -0400, DoD <thecats@ss.mil> wrote:

"Strife767" <strife767@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:op.thqglg195i5s70@chris...

On Fri, 20 Oct 2006 14:08:22 -0400, DoD <thecats@ss.mil> wrote:

"Strife767" <strife767@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:op.thqc9qxi5i5s70@chris...

Families are no longer chattle

Families were never chattle.

LOL, wow, someone didn't pay attention in history class.

Somebody didn't make it into the spelling bee....
C*H*A*T*T*E*L.

Wow, a typo. You're really reduced to jumping on that, huh? Not
surprised.

That's illiteracy, not a "typo".

Wow--so two letters switched equals illiteracy? You moron.

There are typos and there are typos. That was illiteracy, you
cretin.

Don't Google "teh." Your head might explode.

Duh.
.

User: "Strife767"
Title: Re: Rabbis: Jerusalem Gay Parade May Lead to War	21 Oct 2006 12:29:45 PM

On Sat, 21 Oct 2006 10:33:34 -0400, The Re'vr''ddd
<reniggade@anglikkkoon.com.za> wrote:

On Sat, 21 Oct 2006 06:12:01 GMT, Strife767 <strife767@gmail.com>
wrote:

On Sat, 21 Oct 2006 00:16:52 -0400, The Re'vr''ddd
<reniggade@anglikkkoon.com.za> wrote:

On Fri, 20 Oct 2006 19:33:05 GMT, Strife767 <strife767@gmail.com>
wrote:

On Fri, 20 Oct 2006 14:54:56 -0400, DoD <thecats@ss.mil> wrote:

"Strife767" <strife767@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:op.thqglg195i5s70@chris...

On Fri, 20 Oct 2006 14:08:22 -0400, DoD <thecats@ss.mil> wrote:

"Strife767" <strife767@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:op.thqc9qxi5i5s70@chris...

Families are no longer chattle

Families were never chattle.

LOL, wow, someone didn't pay attention in history class.

Somebody didn't make it into the spelling bee....
C*H*A*T*T*E*L.

Wow, a typo. You're really reduced to jumping on that, huh? Not
surprised.

That's illiteracy, not a "typo".

Wow--so two letters switched equals illiteracy? You moron.

There are typos and there are typos. That was illiteracy, you
cretin.

Merely two adjacent letters typed in the wrong order. You are really
grasping for straws, even in your ad hominem attacks. How pathetic. :)

Don't Google "teh." Your head might explode.

Duh.

I didn't expect someone of your mental caliber to understand. :)
--
____________ _____________ __________________
__ ___/_ /__________(_)__ __/____/__ /_ ___/__ /
_____ \_ __/_ ___/_ /__ /_ _ _ \_ /_ __ \__ /
____/ // /_ _ / _ / _ __/ / __/ / / /_/ /_ /
/____/ \__/ /_/ /_/ /_/ \___//_/ \____/ /_/
Skeptic, atheist...and somehow an optimist. Go figure.
I want to change the world.
.

User: "The Revrddd"
Title: Re: Rabbis: Jerusalem Gay Parade May Lead to War	21 Oct 2006 03:05:48 PM

On Sat, 21 Oct 2006 17:29:45 GMT, Strife767 <strife767@gmail.com>
wrote: