Religions > Atheism > Ray Fischer, STOP RUNNING!! You wanted a debate? Here I am
| Topic: |
Religions > Atheism |
| User: |
"" |
| Date: |
07 Aug 2006 10:41:01 AM |
| Object: |
Ray Fischer, STOP RUNNING!! You wanted a debate? Here I am |
Let's get to it. *You* pick the topic
--
----------
J Yöung
youngopinions@aol.com
.
|
|
| User: "Ray Fischer" |
|
| Title: Re: Jon Young, STOP RUNNING!! You wanted a debate? Here I am |
08 Aug 2006 12:35:34 AM |
|
|
<youngopinions@aol.com> wrote:
Let's get to it. *You* pick the topic
I gave you TWO already. You've run away from both.
Justify your wish to force women to give birth.
Justify your discrimination against gays.
Justify your hatred of freedom.
--
Ray Fischer
rfischer@sonic.net
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: STOP RUNNING!! You wanted a debate? Here I am |
08 Aug 2006 12:57:43 AM |
|
|
"Ray Fischer" <rfischer@sonic.net> wrote in message
news:44d822a6$0$34562$742ec2ed@news.sonic.net...
<youngopinions@aol.com> wrote:
Let's get to it. *You* pick the topic
I gave you TWO already. You've run away from both.
Justify your wish to force women to give birth.
As sad as an unwanted pregnancy may be, killing the unborn child is not the
solution.
Justify your discrimination against gays.
I do not practice or endorse discrimination against gays. If anything, my
stances are more pro-gay than your's. You favor behaviours that have proven
to be lethal to gays while I espouse a cleaner, healthier lifestyle that
will add *years* to the life of the average homo. I do not approve of any
class of people being granted special rights in case you're alluding to my
opposition to same-sex marriage.
Justify your hatred of freedom.
I love freedom, but I don't feel the need to extend our privileges to the
enemy.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Ray Fischer" |
|
| Title: Re: STOP RUNNING!! You wanted a debate? Here I am |
08 Aug 2006 01:39:06 AM |
|
|
<youngopinions@aol.com> wrote:
"Ray Fischer" <rfischer@sonic.net> wrote in message
<youngopinions@aol.com> wrote:
Let's get to it. *You* pick the topic
I gave you TWO already. You've run away from both.
Justify your wish to force women to give birth.
As sad as an unwanted pregnancy may be, killing the unborn child is not the
solution.
Thus you should not be allowed to kill children either and we should
take all of your money and your freedom and force you to support
children who will otherwise die.
Justify your discrimination against gays.
I do not practice or endorse discrimination against gays.
Lying is a sin.
Justify your hatred of freedom.
I love freedom,
Again and again we see you attack freedom and its defenders.
You hate freedom. You want to force everybody to live according to
your dictates.
--
Ray Fischer
rfischer@sonic.net
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: STOP RUNNING!! You wanted a debate? Here I am |
08 Aug 2006 09:33:17 AM |
|
|
"Ray Fischer" <rfischer@sonic.net> wrote in message
news:44d8318a$0$34546$742ec2ed@news.sonic.net...
<youngopinions@aol.com> wrote:
"Ray Fischer" <rfischer@sonic.net> wrote in message
<youngopinions@aol.com> wrote:
Let's get to it. *You* pick the topic
I gave you TWO already. You've run away from both.
Justify your wish to force women to give birth.
As sad as an unwanted pregnancy may be, killing the unborn child is not
the
solution.
Thus you should not be allowed to kill children either and we should
take all of your money and your freedom and force you to support
children who will otherwise die.
I wholeheartedly agree that I, nor anyone else, should be allowed to kill
children. Your statement that all my money should be taken from me to
support unwanted children is without logic. How about
#1) Take some of that money your boy Bush is wasting in Iraq and use it for
economically disadvantaged families. Or...
#2) Maybe the "mom" should drink less and display some decency. Most of
these unwanted pregnancies are nothing more than the result of drunken,
promiscuous behaviour.
Justify your discrimination against gays.
I do not practice or endorse discrimination against gays.
Lying is a sin.
That's only your opinion, not a fact. What have *you* done for homos? If the
answer to "nothing", that makes you a 'homophobe' by your definition
.
|
|
|
| User: "Ray Fischer" |
|
| Title: Re: STOP RUNNING!! You wanted a debate? Here I am |
09 Aug 2006 02:59:51 AM |
|
|
<youngopinions@aol.com> wrote:
"Ray Fischer" <rfischer@sonic.net> wrote in message
<youngopinions@aol.com> wrote:
"Ray Fischer" <rfischer@sonic.net> wrote in message
<youngopinions@aol.com> wrote:
Let's get to it. *You* pick the topic
I gave you TWO already. You've run away from both.
Justify your wish to force women to give birth.
As sad as an unwanted pregnancy may be, killing the unborn child is not
the
solution.
Thus you should not be allowed to kill children either and we should
take all of your money and your freedom and force you to support
children who will otherwise die.
I wholeheartedly agree that I, nor anyone else, should be allowed to kill
children.
And yet here you are, "killing" children.
Your statement that all my money should be taken from me to
support unwanted children is without logic.
It shows that you have no justification for your position.
Like most pro-liars your entire position depends upon lies. This time
the lie is that you only want to prevent the killing of fetuses. The
truth is that you want women forced to keep fetuses alive.
The question then becomes: Why should you be free to let children die
when women are forced to suffer pain and injury and risk and expense
to keep fetuses alive?
And the answer to THAt question is that you're a lying control freak
who only wants to force people to do as you demand.
[...]
#2) Maybe the "mom" should drink less and display some decency. Most of
these unwanted pregnancies are nothing more than the result of drunken,
promiscuous behaviour.
And there is the misogyny that drives all anti-abortion assholes.
Justify your discrimination against gays.
I do not practice or endorse discrimination against gays.
Lying is a sin.
That's only your opinion, not a fact.
Look in your Bible, pro-liar.
--
Ray Fischer
rfischer@sonic.net
.
|
|
|
| User: "gatt" |
|
| Title: Re: STOP RUNNING!! You wanted a debate? Here I am |
09 Aug 2006 01:56:22 PM |
|
|
<youngopinions@aol.com> wrote:
I wholeheartedly agree that I, nor anyone else, should be allowed to kill
children.
You must be pretty outraged by the US military presense in Iraq then, huh?
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: STOP RUNNING!! You wanted a debate? Here I am |
09 Aug 2006 09:24:23 AM |
|
|
"Ray Fischer" <rfischer@sonic.net> wrote in message
news:44d995f7$0$34530$742ec2ed@news.sonic.net...
<youngopinions@aol.com> wrote:
I wholeheartedly agree that I, nor anyone else, should be allowed to kill
children.
And yet here you are, "killing" children.
Cite, don't just claim. I oppose abortion, which is terminating the life of
an unborn child. Where have I ever advocated killing any child, let alone a
defenseless pre-born?
Your statement that all my money should be taken from me to
support unwanted children is without logic.
It shows that you have no justification for your position.
Like most pro-liars your entire position depends upon lies. This time
the lie is that you only want to prevent the killing of fetuses. The
truth is that you want women forced to keep fetuses alive.
The question then becomes: Why should you be free to let children die
when women are forced to suffer pain and injury and risk and expense
to keep fetuses alive?
And the answer to THAt question is that you're a lying control freak
who only wants to force people to do as you demand.
Using your logic, the amount of money one is willing to spend is the
determinig factor of whether abortion is a 'right' or a blood-curdling
murder of the pre-born. Where is your sense of decency?
[...]
#2) Maybe the "mom" should drink less and display some decency. Most of
these unwanted pregnancies are nothing more than the result of drunken,
promiscuous behaviour.
And there is the misogyny that drives all anti-abortion assholes.
You can't argue with that point so you resort to name calling.
Lying is a sin.
That's only your opinion, not a fact.
Look in your Bible, pro-liar.
Tell me the chapter and verse please where it say's I discriminate against
gays or am lying about it. Sorry Ray, but so far, this debate is not going
well for you.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Ray Fischer" |
|
| Title: Re: STOP RUNNING!! You wanted a debate? Here I am |
09 Aug 2006 12:48:50 PM |
|
|
<youngopinions@aol.com> wrote:
"Ray Fischer" <rfischer@sonic.net> wrote in message
<youngopinions@aol.com> wrote:
I wholeheartedly agree that I, nor anyone else, should be allowed to kill
children.
And yet here you are, "killing" children.
Cite, don't just claim.
If a woman's refusal to keep a fetus alive is killing it, then your
refusal to keep starving children alive is killing children.
Where have I ever advocated killing any child,
Where has anybody, pro-liar?
Your statement that all my money should be taken from me to
support unwanted children is without logic.
It shows that you have no justification for your position.
Like most pro-liars your entire position depends upon lies. This time
the lie is that you only want to prevent the killing of fetuses. The
truth is that you want women forced to keep fetuses alive.
The question then becomes: Why should you be free to let children die
when women are forced to suffer pain and injury and risk and expense
to keep fetuses alive?
And the answer to THAt question is that you're a lying control freak
who only wants to force people to do as you demand.
Using your logic, the amount of money one is willing to spend is the
determinig factor of whether abortion is a 'right' or a blood-curdling
No, you stupid dumbshit.
You do not care what happens to children.
All your claims otherwise are LIES. All you care about is punishmeng
women and making them suffer for the crime of sex.
#2) Maybe the "mom" should drink less and display some decency. Most of
these unwanted pregnancies are nothing more than the result of drunken,
promiscuous behaviour.
And there is the misogyny that drives all anti-abortion assholes.
You can't argue with that point
Your characterization of women as promiscuous sluts is rank bigotry
and misogyny. You're just an anti-sex PERVERT.
Tell us, pervert: When did you decide that sex should be dirty?
Lying is a sin.
That's only your opinion, not a fact.
Look in your Bible, pro-liar.
Tell me the chapter and verse please
I'm not surprised that you wouldn't be familiar with the Bible.
--
Ray Fischer
rfischer@sonic.net
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "gatt" |
|
| Title: Re: STOP RUNNING!! You wanted a debate? Here I am |
09 Aug 2006 01:58:24 PM |
|
|
<youngopinions@aol.com> wrote in message
news:1u2dneRyarDCbUTZnZ2dnUVZ_ridnZ2d@giganews.com...
And yet here you are, "killing" children.
Cite, don't just claim. I oppose abortion, which is terminating the life
of an unborn child. Where have I ever advocated killing any child, let
alone a defenseless pre-born?
I challenge you to publically denounce the Bush administration for engaging
the war in Iraq, and for the destruction of Fallujah by US Marine warriors
and heroes.
C'mon. 'Cause children were killed there, and, check this out:
"You're Either With Us, Or You're Against Us."
Which is it?
-c
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Andrealphus" |
|
| Title: Re: STOP RUNNING!! You wanted a debate? Here I am |
09 Aug 2006 04:34:44 PM |
|
|
In News 1u2dneRyarDCbUTZnZ2dnUVZ_ridnZ2d@giganews.com,,
youngopinions@aol.com at youngopinions@aol.com, typed this:
"Ray Fischer" <rfischer@sonic.net> wrote in message
news:44d995f7$0$34530$742ec2ed@news.sonic.net...
<youngopinions@aol.com> wrote:
I wholeheartedly agree that I, nor anyone else, should be allowed
to kill children.
And yet here you are, "killing" children.
Cite, don't just claim. I oppose abortion, which is terminating the
life of an unborn child. Where have I ever advocated killing any
child, let alone a defenseless pre-born?
You worship a deity that has freely admitted killing men, women, and
children. I'd call that assessory after the fact.
--
Question with boldness even the existence of god; because if there be
one, he must more approve the homage of reason than that of blindfolded
fear. – Thomas Jefferson
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Josh Miles" |
|
| Title: Re: STOP RUNNING!! You wanted a debate? Here I am |
08 Aug 2006 11:04:16 AM |
|
|
wrote:
"Ray Fischer" <rfischer@sonic.net> wrote in message
news:44d8318a$0$34546$742ec2ed@news.sonic.net...
< > wrote:
"Ray Fischer" <rfischer@sonic.net> wrote in message
< > wrote:
Let's get to it. *You* pick the topic
I gave you TWO already. You've run away from both.
Justify your wish to force women to give birth.
As sad as an unwanted pregnancy may be, killing the unborn child is not
the
solution.
Thus you should not be allowed to kill children either and we should
take all of your money and your freedom and force you to support
children who will otherwise die.
I wholeheartedly agree that I, nor anyone else, should be allowed to kill
children.
Abortion doesn't involve killing children.
Your statement that all my money should be taken from me to
support unwanted children is without logic. How about
#1) Take some of that money your boy Bush is wasting in Iraq and use it for
economically disadvantaged families. Or...
#2) Maybe the "mom" should drink less and display some decency. Most of
these unwanted pregnancies are nothing more than the result of drunken,
promiscuous behaviour.
And where is your evidence for that? Here again you display your bigotry
and misogyny.
Justify your discrimination against gays.
I do not practice or endorse discrimination against gays.
Lying is a sin.
That's only your opinion, not a fact. What have *you* done for homos? If the
answer to "nothing", that makes you a 'homophobe' by your definition
A homophobe, by definition, is someone who has an irrational fear and
hatred of homosexuals. That would be you, Young.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "The Chief Instigator" |
|
| Title: Re: STOP RUNNING!! You wanted a debate? Here I am |
08 Aug 2006 10:41:54 AM |
|
|
<youngopinions@aol.com> writes:
"Ray Fischer" <rfischer@sonic.net> wrote in message
news:44d822a6$0$34562$742ec2ed@news.sonic.net...
<youngopinions@aol.com> wrote:
Let's get to it. *You* pick the topic
I gave you TWO already. You've run away from both.
Justify your wish to force women to give birth.
As sad as an unwanted pregnancy may be, killing the unborn child is not the
solution.
If it's not your pregnancy, it's not your decision to make.
Justify your discrimination against gays.
I do not practice or endorse discrimination against gays. If anything, my
stances are more pro-gay than your's. You favor behaviours that have proven
to be lethal to gays while I espouse a cleaner, healthier lifestyle that
will add *years* to the life of the average homo. I do not approve of any
class of people being granted special rights in case you're alluding to my
opposition to same-sex marriage.
Of course you don't...because you'll espouse *any* opinion whether you believe
in it or not, just so long as you annoy people and get attention. (Never mind
that same-sex marriage isn't a special right, but an equal right. I married
the non-related consenting adult of my choice, and I'm heterosexual.
Homosexuals don't have that same right. Have fun tapdancing around that
inconvenient fact.)
Justify your hatred of freedom.
I love freedom, but I don't feel the need to extend our privileges to the
enemy.
....especially when you've posted the same opinions as your supposed enemy at
one time or another. Fortunately, most of the audience is aware of your sorry
history, so you'll just have to find someone as clueless as yourself if you
want the praise you demand.
--
Patrick "The Chief Instigator" Humphrey (patrick@io.com) Houston, Texas
chiefinstigator.us.tt/aeros.php (TCI's 2006-07 Houston Aeros)
LAST GAME: Milwaukee 4, Houston 2 (May 9)
NEXT GAME: Saturday, October 7 vs. Grand Rapids, 7:35
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Parsifal" |
|
| Title: Re: STOP RUNNING!! You wanted a debate? Here I am |
08 Aug 2006 01:17:05 AM |
|
|
a =E9crit :
"Ray Fischer" <rfischer@sonic.net> wrote in message
news:44d822a6$0$34562$742ec2ed@news.sonic.net...
< > wrote:
Let's get to it. *You* pick the topic
I gave you TWO already. You've run away from both.
Justify your wish to force women to give birth.
As sad as an unwanted pregnancy may be, killing the unborn child is not t=
he
solution.
These are not unborn child to start with. Not more taht you're a
pre-dead person,
Justify your discrimination against gays.
I do not practice or endorse discrimination against gays. If anything, my
stances are more pro-gay than your's.
Are you serious when you write this nonsense? Do you really believe
yourself? You're not fooling anyone you know...
You favor behaviours that have proven
to be lethal to gays while I espouse a cleaner, healthier lifestyle that
will add *years* to the life of the average homo.
Who are you to decide for people what's healthier for them? Besides,
your life is filled with hatred and intolerance, talk about "espousing
a cleaner and healthier lifestyle".
I do not approve of any
class of people being granted special rights in case you're alluding to my
opposition to same-sex marriage.
This isn't a special right, it's the SAME right that heterosexuals
have. Using the same argument, you most certainly would have
disapproved of the desegregation in the 50s and 60s. Funny, I'm 100%
straight, married and I don't feel threatened like you are about
same-sex marriage.
Justify your hatred of freedom.
I love freedom, but I don't feel the need to extend our privileges to the
enemy.
Who are your enemies? Oh, I know: homosexuals, Blacks (that you persist
in calling "coloured", "spades"), Jews, Muslims, democrats, liberals...
basically everyone who doesn't think like you. Considering how sick you
are, that means pretty much everyone.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Sara Brum" |
|
| Title: Re: STOP RUNNING!! You wanted a debate? Here I am |
08 Aug 2006 06:45:06 AM |
|
|
"Parsifal" <jeanpascalvachon@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1155017824.962926.124870@p79g2000cwp.googlegroups.com...
youngopinions@aol.com a écrit :
"Ray Fischer" <rfischer@sonic.net> wrote in message
news:44d822a6$0$34562$742ec2ed@news.sonic.net...
<youngopinions@aol.com> wrote:
Let's get to it. *You* pick the topic
I gave you TWO already. You've run away from both.
Justify your wish to force women to give birth.
As sad as an unwanted pregnancy may be, killing the unborn child is not
the
solution.
These are not unborn child to start with. Not more taht you're a
pre-dead person,
He is a pre-dead person. He isn't a pre-dead corpse.
Though I suspect most of the matter between his ears has long since shuffled
off this mortal coil.
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Josh Miles" |
|
| Title: Re: STOP RUNNING!! You wanted a debate? Here I am |
08 Aug 2006 08:14:52 AM |
|
|
wrote:
"Ray Fischer" <rfischer@sonic.net> wrote in message
news:44d822a6$0$34562$742ec2ed@news.sonic.net...
< > wrote:
Let's get to it. *You* pick the topic
I gave you TWO already. You've run away from both.
Justify your wish to force women to give birth.
As sad as an unwanted pregnancy may be, killing the unborn child is not the
solution.
There is no such thing as an unborn child.
Justify your discrimination against gays.
I do not practice or endorse discrimination against gays. If anything, my
stances are more pro-gay than your's. You favor behaviours that have proven
to be lethal to gays
Not all homosexuals are promiscuous and have unprotected sex. That sort
of behavior is not limited to homosexuals, and is potentially harmful to
*anyone* who does.
while I espouse a cleaner, healthier lifestyle that
will add *years* to the life of the average homo.
Many people drink, smoke, and have very unhealthy diets--all of which
are potentially lethal habits--yet I don't see you say a word about that.
Also, your paternalistic attitude is disgusting and offensive.
I do not approve of any class of people being granted special rights in case
you're alluding to my opposition to same-sex marriage.
They're not asking for special rights, they're asking for *equal*
rights. Marriage is a very basic right; there's nothing "special" about it.
Justify your hatred of freedom.
I love freedom,
No you don't. You're against gay marriage and against a woman's right to
choose what to do with her body. If you oppose those two very basic
rights, you oppose freedom altogether.
but I don't feel the need to extend our privileges to the
enemy.
The enemy? Who's the enemy? I think you've just (once again) shot
yourself in the foot here.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Malcolm" |
|
| Title: Re: STOP RUNNING!! You wanted a debate? Here I am |
09 Aug 2006 04:46:08 PM |
|
|
"Josh Miles" <no@thanks.com> wrote
youngopinions@aol.com wrote:
Not all homosexuals are promiscuous and have unprotected sex. That sort of
behavior is not limited to homosexuals, and is potentially harmful to
*anyone* who does.
Very much a semi-truth. Two men, both virgins, don't meet and decide to
establish an exclusive homosexual relationship, which lasts until they die.
Homosexual sex just doesn't happen that way.
Of course in a country the size of the United States you will always find a
few individual examples of pretty much anything. That doesn't change the
basic point.
Many people drink, smoke, and have very unhealthy diets--all of which are
potentially lethal habits--yet I don't see you say a word about that.
The government is tackling drinking, smoking and diet in a largely sensible
way. You can of course argue about the wisdom of a drinking age of 21, or
the right level of tax on cigarette packets, but the basic aim of policy is
sound.
Unfortunately there are not similar campaigns to dissuade people from
homosexual activity.
They're not asking for special rights, they're asking for *equal* rights.
Marriage is a very basic right; there's nothing "special" about it.
They are asking for discrimination between them and two single men who
happen to share a flat.
No you don't. You're against gay marriage and against a woman's right to
choose what to do with her body. If you oppose those two very basic
rights, you oppose freedom altogether.
Yes. He opposes the philosphical position that anything must be allowed
unless it infringes the rights, however defined, of another adult citizen.
Do you think contracts involving sex should be enforceable? If not, why not?
--
www.personal.leeds.ac.uk/~bgy1mm
freeware games to download.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Andrealphus" |
|
| Title: Re: STOP RUNNING!! You wanted a debate? Here I am |
09 Aug 2006 06:00:49 PM |
|
|
In News AMKdnTDUYODb-kfZRVny3w@bt.com,, Malcolm at regniztar@btinternet.com,
typed this:
"Josh Miles" <no@thanks.com> wrote
youngopinions@aol.com wrote:
Not all homosexuals are promiscuous and have unprotected sex. That
sort of behavior is not limited to homosexuals, and is potentially
harmful to *anyone* who does.
Very much a semi-truth. Two men, both virgins, don't meet and decide
to establish an exclusive homosexual relationship, which lasts until
they die. Homosexual sex just doesn't happen that way.
LOL! You seem to think you're quite the expert on all things homosexual.
Somehow I have my doubts that you have even the slightest clue.
--
Question with boldness even the existence of god; because if there be
one, he must more approve the homage of reason than that of blindfolded
fear. – Thomas Jefferson
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "--sexkitten--" |
|
| Title: Re: STOP RUNNING!! You wanted a debate? Here I am |
08 Aug 2006 09:20:42 AM |
|
|
wrote:
I do not practice or endorse discrimination against gays. If anything, my
stances are more pro-gay than your's. You favor behaviours that have proven
to be lethal to gays while I espouse a cleaner, healthier lifestyle that
will add *years* to the life of the average homo.
Marriage, you mean?
--
--sexkitten--
Sneechres and people searches:
1130571778.956274.188530@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com
DOING ANY SEARCHES AT ALL would give you more detail than you needed to
know.
1130665660_3361@spool6-east.superfeed.net
She doesn't know my situation because she doesn't feel the need to go
looking into other people's business like you do.
1414fd53.0203122023.23a36970@posting.google.com
FYI, all a.a. readers who are familiar with Craig Chilton:
Craig has claimed no fewer than six times that he is an elected
official of the Iowa Republican party. To be specific, he says that
he has been *RE*-elected the State Central Committee:
BUT: I did some homework by speaking directly to members of the Iowa
Republican party, specifically, Marlys Popma, Darrell Kearney, Joel
Hannahs, Chad Barth, and Carolyn McGoldrick. I received responses
from some of them, and they did not recognize the name Craig Chilton.
Mr. Kearney flat out said Craig was not a member of the central
committee whatsoever.
Okay, so maybe they aren't entirely informed. But, what about the
website? Wouldn't the Local Party Officials directory for Black Hawk
county have Craig's name there?
http://www.iowagop.org/directory.asp
Hm, no Craig.
Let's try somewhere else:
http://www.elect...@co.black-hawk.ia.us/ ?
Nope.
A Google search of Iowa Republicans, Black Hawk County Republicans,
and the like produced nothing. Black Hawk County Republicans site
seemed to be having server trouble, and if anything develops with it I
will post it.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: STOP RUNNING!! You wanted a debate? Here I am |
08 Aug 2006 01:04:50 AM |
|
|
It's late where I am. I'm going to sleep. Good Night!!! To be
continued..........
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Mark K. Bilbo" |
|
| Title: Re: STOP RUNNING!! You wanted a debate? Here I am |
08 Aug 2006 09:17:54 AM |
|
|
On Tue, 08 Aug 2006 01:57:43 -0400, youngopinions in
<4cedncWjcbaJtUXZnZ2dnUVZ_vCdnZ2d@giganews.com> wrote:
I do not practice or endorse discrimination against gays. If anything, my
stances are more pro-gay than your's. You favor behaviours that have
proven to be lethal to gays while I espouse a cleaner, healthier lifestyle
that will add *years* to the life of the average homo. I do not approve of
any class of people being granted special rights in case you're alluding
to my opposition to same-sex marriage.
See, if there really was a "god," lying like this would have gotten you
vaporized by a bolt of lightning a long time ago...
--
Mark K. Bilbo
--------------------------------------------------
"As hip as it is for outsiders to blame New Orleans
for everything bad that happened during and after
Hurricane Katrina, the truth is that the people
who lived here were much more prepared for a big
storm than the federal government that promised
us flood protection." [Jarvis DeBerry]
http://makeashorterlink.com/?V180525DC
"Everything New Orleans"
http://www.nola.com
.
|
|
|
| User: "Tink" |
|
| Title: AQOTM, was: Re: STOP RUNNING!! You wanted a debate? Here I am |
10 Aug 2006 11:10:24 AM |
|
|
Mark K. Bilbo wrote:
On Tue, 08 Aug 2006 01:57:43 -0400, youngopinions in
<4cedncWjcbaJtUXZnZ2dnUVZ_vCdnZ2d@giganews.com> wrote:
I do not practice or endorse discrimination against gays. If anything, my
stances are more pro-gay than your's. You favor behaviours that have
proven to be lethal to gays while I espouse a cleaner, healthier lifestyle
that will add *years* to the life of the average homo. I do not approve of
any class of people being granted special rights in case you're alluding
to my opposition to same-sex marriage.
/nomination
See, if there really was a "god," lying like this would have gotten you
vaporized by a bolt of lightning a long time ago...
/nomination
In the category of "It's hard to believe in god when certain people
aren't incinerated".
--
Skydivers don't knock on death's door; they ring the bell and run
away... It really pisses him off.
The World Famous Tink. (I never heard of you either!!)
AA #2069 ASA#33 POPS# 8808
EAC Chairman, Division of Skydiving and Sushi consumption.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Believe in Bretts" |
|
| Title: Re: AQOTM, was: Re: STOP RUNNING!! You wanted a debate? Here I am |
10 Aug 2006 11:36:19 AM |
|
|
On Thu, 10 Aug 2006 12:10:24 -0400, Tink
<kjgrish@comcast.net.spamno.ccom> wrote:
Mark K. Bilbo wrote:
On Tue, 08 Aug 2006 01:57:43 -0400, youngopinions in
<4cedncWjcbaJtUXZnZ2dnUVZ_vCdnZ2d@giganews.com> wrote:
I do not practice or endorse discrimination against gays. If anything, my
stances are more pro-gay than your's. You favor behaviours that have
proven to be lethal to gays while I espouse a cleaner, healthier lifestyle
that will add *years* to the life of the average homo. I do not approve of
any class of people being granted special rights in case you're alluding
to my opposition to same-sex marriage.
/nomination
See, if there really was a "god," lying like this would have gotten you
vaporized by a bolt of lightning a long time ago...
/nomination
In the category of "It's hard to believe in god when certain people
aren't incinerated".
Seconded. The quote is concise, witty, and true. It serves as an
appropriate response to Christianity itself.
______________________________
Ye believe in God, believe also in Bretts.
(John 14:1)
.
|
|
|
| User: "*nemo*" |
|
| Title: Re: AQOTM, was: Re: STOP RUNNING!! You wanted a debate? Here I am |
12 Aug 2006 05:20:25 PM |
|
|
In article <1knmd29jd0t840h9d0t55kbepn32ornlom@4ax.com>,
Believe in Bretts <Hallelujah@InJesusName.amen> wrote:
On Thu, 10 Aug 2006 12:10:24 -0400, Tink
<kjgrish@comcast.net.spamno.ccom> wrote:
Mark K. Bilbo wrote:
On Tue, 08 Aug 2006 01:57:43 -0400, youngopinions in
<4cedncWjcbaJtUXZnZ2dnUVZ_vCdnZ2d@giganews.com> wrote:
I do not practice or endorse discrimination against gays. If anything, my
stances are more pro-gay than your's. You favor behaviours that have
proven to be lethal to gays while I espouse a cleaner, healthier lifestyle
that will add *years* to the life of the average homo. I do not approve of
any class of people being granted special rights in case you're alluding
to my opposition to same-sex marriage.
/nomination
See, if there really was a "god," lying like this would have gotten you
vaporized by a bolt of lightning a long time ago...
/nomination
In the category of "It's hard to believe in god when certain people
aren't incinerated".
Seconded. The quote is concise, witty, and true. It serves as an
appropriate response to Christianity itself.
______________________________
Ye believe in God, believe also in Bretts.
(John 14:1)
Recorded
--
Nemo - EAC Commissioner for Bible Belt Underwater Operations.
Atheist #1331 (the Palindrome of doom!)
BAAWA Knight! - One of those warm Southern Knights, y'all!
Charter member, SMASH!!
http://home.earthlink.net/~jehdjh/Relpg.html
Draco Dormiens Nunquam Titillandus
Quotemeister since March 2002
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Parsifal" |
|
| Title: Re: Ray Fischer, STOP RUNNING!! You wanted a debate? Here I am |
07 Aug 2006 04:38:19 PM |
|
|
schrieb:
Let's get to it. *You* pick the topic
Can I play too?
Here's my topic: why are you a bigotted, racist, intolerant, homophobic
jerk?=20
--=20
----------
=20
J Y=F6ung
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "wcb" |
|
| Title: Re: Ray Fischer, STOP RUNNING!! You wanted a debate? Here I am |
06 Aug 2006 12:29:12 PM |
|
|
wrote:
Let's get to it. *You* pick the topic
When did dungopinion become a moron?
That would be a good topic.
--
"The world holds two classes of men -- intelligent
men without religion, and religious men without
intelligence".
- Abu'l-Ala-Al-Ma'arri (973-1057; Syrian poet)
Cheerful Charlie
.
|
|
|
| User: "Mark K. Bilbo" |
|
| Title: Re: Ray Fischer, STOP RUNNING!! You wanted a debate? Here I am |
07 Aug 2006 07:18:02 PM |
|
|
On Sun, 06 Aug 2006 12:29:12 -0500, wcb in
<12deu4k1fl72t7d@corp.supernews.com> wrote:
youngopinions@aol.com wrote:
Let's get to it. *You* pick the topic
When did dungopinion become a moron?
That would be a good topic.
Become?
--
Mark K. Bilbo
--------------------------------------------------
"As hip as it is for outsiders to blame New Orleans
for everything bad that happened during and after
Hurricane Katrina, the truth is that the people
who lived here were much more prepared for a big
storm than the federal government that promised
us flood protection." [Jarvis DeBerry]
http://makeashorterlink.com/?V180525DC
"Everything New Orleans"
http://www.nola.com
.
|
|
|
| User: "Dysperdis" |
|
| Title: Re: Ray Fischer, STOP RUNNING!! You wanted a debate? Here I am |
07 Aug 2006 07:39:47 PM |
|
|
"Mark K. Bilbo" <gmail@com.mkbilbo> wrote in message
news:3d-dnaMVHd-nRUrZnZ2dnUVZ_tKdnZ2d@megapath.net...
On Sun, 06 Aug 2006 12:29:12 -0500, wcb in
<12deu4k1fl72t7d@corp.supernews.com> wrote:
youngopinions@aol.com wrote:
Let's get to it. *You* pick the topic
When did dungopinion become a moron?
That would be a good topic.
Become?
Yeah: Was he born that way, or can he change? Would ex-moron therapy be any
more useful than the so-called "ex-gay" therapy he believes so heartily in?
.
|
|
|
| User: "L. Michael Roberts" |
|
| Title: Re: Ray Fischer, STOP RUNNING!! You wanted a debate? Here I am |
07 Aug 2006 10:12:02 PM |
|
|
Dysperdis wrote:
"Mark K. Bilbo" <gmail@com.mkbilbo> wrote in message
news:3d-dnaMVHd-nRUrZnZ2dnUVZ_tKdnZ2d@megapath.net...
On Sun, 06 Aug 2006 12:29:12 -0500, wcb in
<12deu4k1fl72t7d@corp.supernews.com> wrote:
youngopinions@aol.com wrote:
Let's get to it. *You* pick the topic
When did dungopinion become a moron?
That would be a good topic.
Become?
Yeah: Was he born that way, or can he change? Would ex-moron therapy be any
more useful than the so-called "ex-gay" therapy he believes so heartily in?
Ex-moron therapy! ROFLMAO!!!!
--
+========= L. Michael Roberts - Goderich, Ontario, Canada ===========+
This represents my personal opinion and NOT Company policy
To reply, post a request for my valid E-mail or your public PGP key
"Life is a sexually transmitted, terminal, condition"
------------------------------------------------------------------------
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "*nemo*" |
|
| Title: Re: Ray Fischer, STOP RUNNING!! You wanted a debate? Here I am |
07 Aug 2006 05:46:31 PM |
|
|
In article <U_idnSwKivnTwkrZnZ2dnUVZ_t-dnZ2d@giganews.com>,
<youngopinions@aol.com> wrote:
Let's get to it. *You* pick the topic
This, from the guy that never responds in his own threads? Or is this a
forgery of some sort?
--
Nemo - EAC Commissioner for Bible Belt Underwater Operations.
Atheist #1331 (the Palindrome of doom!)
BAAWA Knight! - One of those warm Southern Knights, y'all!
Charter member, SMASH!!
http://home.earthlink.net/~jehdjh/Relpg.html
Draco Dormiens Nunquam Titillandus
Quotemeister since March 2002
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "LC" |
|
| Title: Re: "J Young"!! You wanted a debate? Here I am |
07 Aug 2006 11:46:25 AM |
|
|
Proven liar and coward <youngopinions@aol.com> wrote in message
news:U_idnSwKivnTwkrZnZ2dnUVZ_t-dnZ2d@giganews.com...
Let's get to it. *You* pick the topic
Here's a good one: Explain why you plagiarize your own sockpuppets:
"Nobody knows for sure if hell exists or if it does, what form does it
take. One thing is for sure though, if it does exist it shouldn't be
any suprise about who's going and who's not. People who live perverted
life styles, people who kill or harm innocents, but most especially
those who use God's name to further a political cause are all going.
Heathens are safe if they lead decent lives, but a sense of God is where
we beget our moral values. A life guided by decency and respect is the
ticket to stay out. Assuming, of course, that hell exists."
From: <youngopini...@aol.com>
Newsgroups:
alt.abortion,alt.atheism,alt.politics.democrats.d,alt.politics.homosexuality,seattle.politics
Subject: Hell: who's going and who ain't
Date: Mon, 22 May 2006 01:06:49 -0400
Message-ID:
"Nobody knows for sure if hell exists or if it does, what form does it
take. One thing is for sure though, if it does exist it shouldn't be
any suprise about who's going and who's not. People who live perverted
life styles, people who kill or harm innocents, but most especially
those who use God's name to further a political cause are all going.
Heathens are safe if they lead decent lives but a sense of God is where
we beget our moral values. A life guided by decency and respect is the
ticket to stay out. Assuming, of course, that hell exists."
From: "simon sez" <simonsez@volcanomail.com>, a short-lived "J" sockpuppet.
Newsgroups:
alt.religion.christian,alt.religion.christian.roman-catholic,alt.religion.islam,alt.atheism,seattle.politics
Subject: Hell: who's going and who's not
Date: 15 May 2005 19:02:08 -0700
Message-ID: <1116208928.480675.321390@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>
After you've finished that, please tell us how and when you became a
"Lord"?
"***** you, homo. How do we know your name is "Sanders Kaufman" ? Because you
and your sock-puppets say so? The coward here is *you*, *****, with the
Usenet muscles."
From: "Lord Howard Hertz" <lordhowardhertz@fastmail.fm>
Newsgroups:
fl.politics,alt.california,seattle.politics,or.politics,tx.politics
References: <jc-dnbeE8YvS3FXZnZ2dnUVZ_qqdnZ2d@giganews.com>
<rzXxg.57001$VE1.18463@newssvr14.news.prodigy.com>
Subject: Re: CRUELTY OF SHARIA LAW ( Islam )
Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2006 11:08:45 -0400
Message-ID: <s7mdnbyV4vyvSlXZnZ2dnUVZ_t6dnZ2d@giganews.com>
"Just what I need; another ***** with Usenet muscles."
From: <youngopini...@aol.com>
Newsgroups:
alt.abortion,alt.atheism,alt.politics.liberalism,or.politics,talk.politics.misc
References: <gt6dnWtwcdFpIVPZnZ2dnUVZ_t6dnZ2d@giganews.com>
<59ltc2hd980n86pbckp8fenvknufjtaft5@4ax.com>
Subject: Re: Gitmo Guards Often Attacked by Detainees
Date: Tue, 1 Aug 2006 12:53:30 -0400
Message-ID:
Finally, please describe your responsibilities as "Earl of Rochester":
--
Lord Howard Hertz
Earl of Rochester
lordhowardhe...@fastmail.fm
LC~ Knows "J" is hiding about now.
"anal stimulation with a ***** helps enhance the spanking experience."
From: (Jon Young), seems to enjoy daily spankings.
Newsgroups: soc.sexuality.spanking
Subject: best done with help
Date: 5 Oct 2003 18:00:43 -0700
Message-ID: <567f3dc3.0310051700.31b4eb95@posting.google.com>
.
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
