| Topic: |
Religions > Atheism |
| User: |
" \- Prof. Jonez©" |
| Date: |
26 Jun 2005 10:23:52 PM |
| Object: |
Re: *****! -- Jesus was white |
scholar wrote:
Curtis B. Negron wrote:
Any of you crackers ever considered the fact that Jesus was A) a
Jew, and B) as a lower-class Jew who could not get into any of the
hotels in town, it is likely that he was an African Jew.
Even if Jesus was not totally a black man, he was likely a
dark-skinned Jew. Most Jews were dark and had more African blood
2000 years ago before they were forced by the Arabs to flee into
Europe. The Jews have become much lighter skinned over the past
2000 years as a result of mixing with the light-skinned Europeans.
Jesus was a Negro Jew.
Jesus was the same race as today's Palestinian Christians and
Muslims...i.e. Semitic caucasians [Arabs descended from the Iraqi
Prophet, Ibrahim/"Abraham"].
Therefore, Jesus was a white man (though obviously not a European).
A good example as to who Jesus may have physically resembled is the
late Sheikh Yassin Ahmed (or at least, him in his younger years),
spiritual leader of the Palestinian Hamas movement. He was murdered by
Israeli Jews [these latter being non-Semites, mainly
Slav-Magyar-Mongol mixed-breeds from Eastern Europe].
There may be some traces of Hittite/Aryan [i.e. Afghan] blood, among
the Palestinian population, which would only further confirm that
Jesus was a white man.
Jesus Was Black, Not White.
By Melanie Hunter
CNSNews.com Deputy Managing Editor
February 24, 2004
(CNSNews.com) - One day before it debuts in theaters, a black activist group is
protesting the Mel Gibson-written, directed and produced "The Passion of the
Christ" film, not because of the film's violent depiction of Jesus Christ's
final hours. Instead, they say the film is historically inaccurate because Jesus
is portrayed as a white man, not a black man.
"Strangely absent from the debate is one very basic inaccuracy which has been
long promoted in order to bolster white supremacy and maintain a revisionist
history that is beneficial to only people of European descent," said Malik Z.
Shabazz, national chairman of the New Black Panther Party in a statement
Tuesday.
"This purposely omitted fact is that Jesus was not a European white man. Jesus
Christ was a black man - a dark skinned Hebrew Israelite from Northern Africa
and even the only Biblical physical description confirms this (Rev. 13:20),"
said Shabazz in a statement..
Chapter 13 of the Book of Revelations only ends with verse 18. After CNSNews.com
contacted the New Black Panther Party to clarify the Bible verse they
referenced, Imam Akbar, national minister for the New Black Panther Party,
explained that the original reference was a typo on their original press
release.
Akbar instead, pointed to Revelations 1:14 and 1:15 as well as Daniel 10:6.
"His head and his hairs were white like wool, as white as snow; and his eyes
were as a flame of fire; 15 And his feet like unto fine brass, as if they burned
in a furnace; and his voice as the sound of many waters." (Rev. 1:14 and 1:15)
"His body also was like the beryl, and his face as the appearance of lightning,
and his eyes as lamps of fire, and his arms and his feet like in colour to
polished brass, and the voice of his words like the voice of a multitude."
(Daniel 10:6)
"Not only does this film wrongfully depict Christ as white but all the disciples
and Israelites are people of European descent, which presents a historical and
physical impossibility," Shabazz added.
The New Black Panther Party and other black activists plan to stage protests
nationwide over the controversy. Not only does the group claim the movie is
"false," but also "harmful and racist."
The Anti-Defamation League recently expressed to Gibson its concern that the
film would drum up anti-Semetism. Shabazz said his group disagrees with the
ADL's claims that the film is "anti-semetic" and challenged the ADL to "deny the
historical accuracy of the Jews' attack on Christ."
But Shabazz says, the "true controversy" surrounding the film "lies in the
maligned history of African people through the world and the continual
inaccuracies presented in every Hollywood production to date of any Biblical
story from the 10 Commandments to the Christmas Story."
"These false images presented are 'anti-black' and these false images and
interpretations only seek to further the racist and white supremist idea that
God and Jesus Christ 'The Messiah' or 'Savior' is European and white," he added.
"This is clearly one more example of how black people in this country are
treated unfairly. Black/African history has and continues to be misrepresented,
black people worldwide are subjected to the psychologically abusive images of
white supremacy and have no collective voice to defend or promote a Black
agenda," Shabazz concluded.
.
|
|
| User: "DanielSan" |
|
| Title: Re: *****! -- Jesus was white |
27 Jun 2005 06:35:58 AM |
|
|
Jon° wrote:
1. Fatty Arbuckle was a Hottentot.
2. Errol Flyn was an Eskimo with a yellow skin.
3. Henry 8th was the result of a royal union with a Jap.
4. Jack the Ripper was a gypsy.
5. Napoleon was a gay Southern Sarawakian
6. Nelson was a grey Plutonian.
7. Elizabeth 1st was circumcised.
8. Attila the Hun had piles.
9. Hitler was a merciful Jew
10. Henry Ford said that history is bunk.
What exactly was the reason for this list? And why place my name
afterwards? I don't get it.
"DanielSan" <daniel-san@myrealbox.com> wrote in message
news:4bRve.976$gm6.323@trnddc05...
.
|
|
|
| User: "Jon°" |
|
| Title: Re: *****! -- Jesus was white |
27 Jun 2005 07:54:15 AM |
|
|
I doubt that there is much that you would ever "get".!
"DanielSan" <daniel-san@myrealbox.com> wrote in message
news:ywRve.988$gm6.761@trnddc05...
.
|
|
|
| User: "DanielSan" |
|
| Title: Re: *****! -- Jesus was white |
27 Jun 2005 07:56:10 AM |
|
|
Jon° wrote:
I doubt that there is much that you would ever "get".!
Ah, so you're not only a top-posting troll, you're also immature.
Thanks for clearing that up. :-)
"DanielSan" <daniel-san@myrealbox.com> wrote in message
news:ywRve.988$gm6.761@trnddc05...
.
|
|
|
| User: "Jon°" |
|
| Title: Re: *****! -- Jesus was white |
27 Jun 2005 10:25:56 AM |
|
|
Here we go, the brain dead have to fall back on posting jibes because they
have not got the acumen to answer logic with logic.
As I previously said, a man (or "semi-man") of your calibre could not be
expected to "get anything". I doubt that you can wipe your arse
successfully.
"DanielSan" <daniel-san@myrealbox.com> wrote in message
news:KHSve.32$Ff6.27@trnddc09...
.
|
|
|
| User: "DanielSan" |
|
| Title: Re: *****! -- Jesus was white |
27 Jun 2005 05:14:25 PM |
|
|
Jon° wrote:
Here we go, the brain dead have to fall back on posting jibes because they
have not got the acumen to answer logic with logic.
So, the above's not a jibe? Nor the below?
As I previously said, a man (or "semi-man") of your calibre could not be
expected to "get anything". I doubt that you can wipe your arse
successfully.
When looking at the post on the face of this, if you remove the "jibes,"
the post vanishes. Hm. Interesting. Very telling, too.
"DanielSan" <daniel-san@myrealbox.com> wrote in message
news:KHSve.32$Ff6.27@trnddc09...
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Razor 616" |
|
| Title: Re: *****! -- Jesus was white |
27 Jun 2005 11:01:37 AM |
|
|
On Sun, 26 Jun 2005 21:23:52 -0600, " \"- Prof. Jonez©\""
<jonez@norcom.ca> wrote:
There may be some traces of Hittite/Aryan [i.e. Afghan] blood, among
the Palestinian population, which would only further confirm that
Jesus was a white man.
Jesus Was Black, Not White.
<piggybacking>
If you're a christian, what the ***** does it matter what race Jesus
was, providing he really existed? Or could it be that this guy is
simply another hick closet-racist?
--
#1295
.
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
