Religions > Atheism > Re: **** DEMOCRATS EATING THEIR OWN ***** OVER FOLEY "SCANDAL"!! ****
| Topic: |
Religions > Atheism |
| User: |
"Rick" |
| Date: |
05 Oct 2006 02:23:25 PM |
| Object: |
Re: **** DEMOCRATS EATING THEIR OWN ***** OVER FOLEY "SCANDAL"!! **** |
wrote in message
<1160074829.191310.162380@m7g2000cwm.googlegroups.com>...
Yup.......We now KNOW the IM's were Exchanged between TWO CONSENTING
ADULTS, and the Information was SAT ON BY DEMOCRATS and Saved to use as
an ELECTION SMEAR, and that Democrats are Willing to Throw Gays UNDER
THE BUS in their FAILING Attempt for Political Gain.............In the
meantime, the Stupid Bastards have Totally DESTROYED any other "Points"
they may have gained on any Other Subject, because in the Hysteria Over
Foley everything else has been WIPED OFF THE
MAP..........Heehee..........Them Stupid Lefties just keep Walking Into
Brick Walls...........Har har............<snicker!>..................
Hastert and the Republicans aren't completely out of hot water just yet. But
what I think is too funny is that this whole thing was triggered by
gay-baiting pranks by a conservative Republican Political Science major at
Berkely who hopes to have a career in politics. That future career may in
jeopardy if this episode results in bringing down the entire Republican
party. It's also amusing to see the bumbling involved in the execution of
the hit job - ABC not redacting the name of the kid...oops, I mean adult.
And that sexual predator blog looked fake the first time I saw it. Then
there's the forging of an email:
http://dreadpundit.blogspot.com/2006/10/foley-email-altered.html
I also wonder if the Democrats who were outraged by Hastert's alleged
inaction will be outraged that whoever had the IMs didn't report them to
authorities. It looks like there will be an FBI investigation, so maybe
we'll find out who's behind it. Given the amateurishness of it all, I'd
suspect some kids did it.
- Rick
.
|
|
| User: "Cary Kittrell" |
|
| Title: Re: **** DEMOCRATS EATING THEIR OWN ***** OVER FOLEY "SCANDAL"!! **** |
05 Oct 2006 04:11:38 PM |
|
|
In article <mPydnS5Xj6crxrjYnZ2dnUVZ_tudnZ2d@giganews.com> "Rick" <pl1_alpha_geek@juNOSPAM.com> writes:
theloneranger100@aol.com wrote in message
<1160074829.191310.162380@m7g2000cwm.googlegroups.com>...
Yup.......We now KNOW the IM's were Exchanged between TWO CONSENTING
ADULTS, and the Information was SAT ON BY DEMOCRATS and Saved to use as
an ELECTION SMEAR, and that Democrats are Willing to Throw Gays UNDER
THE BUS in their FAILING Attempt for Political Gain.............In the
meantime, the Stupid Bastards have Totally DESTROYED any other "Points"
they may have gained on any Other Subject, because in the Hysteria Over
Foley everything else has been WIPED OFF THE
MAP..........Heehee..........Them Stupid Lefties just keep Walking Into
Brick Walls...........Har har............<snicker!>..................
Hastert and the Republicans aren't completely out of hot water just yet. But
what I think is too funny is that this whole thing was triggered by
gay-baiting pranks by a conservative Republican Political Science major at
Berkely who hopes to have a career in politics. That future career may in
jeopardy if this episode results in bringing down the entire Republican
party. It's also amusing to see the bumbling involved in the execution of
the hit job - ABC not redacting the name of the kid...oops, I mean adult.
And that sexual predator blog looked fake the first time I saw it. Then
there's the forging of an email:
http://dreadpundit.blogspot.com/2006/10/foley-email-altered.html
I also wonder if the Democrats who were outraged by Hastert's alleged
inaction will be outraged that whoever had the IMs didn't report them to
authorities. It looks like there will be an FBI investigation, so maybe
we'll find out who's behind it. Given the amateurishness of it all, I'd
suspect some kids did it.
And then Foley resigned like a shot, all because of some clumsy and
childish prank?
Why, exactly, would he do that?
-- cary
.
|
|
|
| User: "Rick" |
|
| Title: Re: **** DEMOCRATS EATING THEIR OWN ***** OVER FOLEY "SCANDAL"!! **** |
05 Oct 2006 08:56:29 PM |
|
|
Cary Kittrell wrote in message ...
In article <mPydnS5Xj6crxrjYnZ2dnUVZ_tudnZ2d@giganews.com> "Rick"
<pl1_alpha_geek@juNOSPAM.com> writes:
theloneranger100@aol.com wrote in message
<1160074829.191310.162380@m7g2000cwm.googlegroups.com>...
Yup.......We now KNOW the IM's were Exchanged between TWO CONSENTING
ADULTS, and the Information was SAT ON BY DEMOCRATS and Saved to use as
an ELECTION SMEAR, and that Democrats are Willing to Throw Gays UNDER
THE BUS in their FAILING Attempt for Political Gain.............In the
meantime, the Stupid Bastards have Totally DESTROYED any other "Points"
they may have gained on any Other Subject, because in the Hysteria Over
Foley everything else has been WIPED OFF THE
MAP..........Heehee..........Them Stupid Lefties just keep Walking Into
Brick Walls...........Har har............<snicker!>..................
Hastert and the Republicans aren't completely out of hot water just yet.
But
what I think is too funny is that this whole thing was triggered by
gay-baiting pranks by a conservative Republican Political Science major
at
Berkely who hopes to have a career in politics. That future career may in
jeopardy if this episode results in bringing down the entire Republican
party. It's also amusing to see the bumbling involved in the execution of
the hit job - ABC not redacting the name of the kid...oops, I mean adult.
And that sexual predator blog looked fake the first time I saw it. Then
there's the forging of an email:
http://dreadpundit.blogspot.com/2006/10/foley-email-altered.html
I also wonder if the Democrats who were outraged by Hastert's alleged
inaction will be outraged that whoever had the IMs didn't report them to
authorities. It looks like there will be an FBI investigation, so maybe
we'll find out who's behind it. Given the amateurishness of it all, I'd
suspect some kids did it.
And then Foley resigned like a shot, all because of some clumsy and
childish prank?
Yet another person doesn't read what I wrote.
Why, exactly, would he do that?
I already provided one answer.
- Rick
.
|
|
|
| User: "Cary Kittrell" |
|
| Title: Re: **** DEMOCRATS EATING THEIR OWN ***** OVER FOLEY "SCANDAL"!! **** |
06 Oct 2006 10:24:45 AM |
|
|
In article <asGdnepdh-BMKrjYnZ2dnUVZ_tOdnZ2d@giganews.com> "Rick" <pl1_alpha_geek@juNOSPAM.com> writes:
Cary Kittrell wrote in message ...
In article <mPydnS5Xj6crxrjYnZ2dnUVZ_tudnZ2d@giganews.com> "Rick"
<pl1_alpha_geek@juNOSPAM.com> writes:
theloneranger100@aol.com wrote in message
<1160074829.191310.162380@m7g2000cwm.googlegroups.com>...
Yup.......We now KNOW the IM's were Exchanged between TWO CONSENTING
ADULTS, and the Information was SAT ON BY DEMOCRATS and Saved to use as
an ELECTION SMEAR, and that Democrats are Willing to Throw Gays UNDER
THE BUS in their FAILING Attempt for Political Gain.............In the
meantime, the Stupid Bastards have Totally DESTROYED any other "Points"
they may have gained on any Other Subject, because in the Hysteria Over
Foley everything else has been WIPED OFF THE
MAP..........Heehee..........Them Stupid Lefties just keep Walking Into
Brick Walls...........Har har............<snicker!>..................
Hastert and the Republicans aren't completely out of hot water just yet.
But
what I think is too funny is that this whole thing was triggered by
gay-baiting pranks by a conservative Republican Political Science major
at
Berkely who hopes to have a career in politics. That future career may in
jeopardy if this episode results in bringing down the entire Republican
party. It's also amusing to see the bumbling involved in the execution of
the hit job - ABC not redacting the name of the kid...oops, I mean adult.
And that sexual predator blog looked fake the first time I saw it. Then
there's the forging of an email:
http://dreadpundit.blogspot.com/2006/10/foley-email-altered.html
I also wonder if the Democrats who were outraged by Hastert's alleged
inaction will be outraged that whoever had the IMs didn't report them to
authorities. It looks like there will be an FBI investigation, so maybe
we'll find out who's behind it. Given the amateurishness of it all, I'd
suspect some kids did it.
And then Foley resigned like a shot, all because of some clumsy and
childish prank?
Yet another person doesn't read what I wrote.
Actually, I did.
Three times over in fact, all posts from you, just to
be sure I hadn't ovrlooked something.
I hadn't.
So: if it's all just a prank, why did Foley resign.
Why, exactly, would he do that?
I already provided one answer.
Written, apparently, in invisible phosphors.
-- cary
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Gary DeWaay" |
|
| Title: Re: **** DEMOCRATS EATING THEIR OWN ***** OVER FOLEY "SCANDAL"!! **** |
05 Oct 2006 07:55:30 PM |
|
|
Cary Kittrell's at wisdom:
I also wonder if the Democrats who were outraged by Hastert's alleged
inaction will be outraged that whoever had the IMs didn't report them to
authorities. It looks like there will be an FBI investigation, so maybe
we'll find out who's behind it. Given the amateurishness of it all, I'd
suspect some kids did it.
And then Foley resigned like a shot, all because of some clumsy and
childish prank?
Why, exactly, would he do that?
Nor has he issued anything even resembling a denial.
This is clearly desperation time for righties.
They will believe ANYTHING in hopes of staying in power.
Their "family values" house of cards they relied on for 20 years to get
elected is about to tobble over in a heap, hopefully never to be seen
again.
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "JakTheHammer" |
|
| Title: Re: **** DEMOCRATS EATING THEIR OWN ***** OVER FOLEY "SCANDAL"!! **** |
05 Oct 2006 02:34:39 PM |
|
|
Rick wrote:
Given the amateurishness of it all, I'd suspect some kids did it.
Yup.......Lefties ARE Snot-Nosed, Smarmy Little Pudlicks...........
.
|
|
|
| User: "Amanda Williams" |
|
| Title: Re: **** DEMOCRATS EATING THEIR OWN ***** OVER FOLEY "SCANDAL"!! **** |
05 Oct 2006 03:36:58 PM |
|
|
"JakTheHammer" <jakthhmmr@aol.com> allegedly said in
news:1160076879.791667.128510@i3g2000cwc.googlegroups.com:
Rick wrote:
Given the amateurishness of it all, I'd suspect some kids did it.
Yup.......Lefties ARE Snot-Nosed, Smarmy Little Pudlicks...........
Hey JAK, you wanna know what rightards are eating... well looky here
http://www.rasmussenreports.com/2006/October%20Dailies/MarkFoley.htm
Very sad...
<snicker>
--
AW
<small but dangerous>
.
|
|
|
| User: "stoney" |
|
| Title: Re: **** DEMOCRATS EATING THEIR OWN ***** OVER FOLEY "SCANDAL"!! **** |
09 Oct 2006 05:28:20 PM |
|
|
On 05 Oct 2006 20:36:58 GMT, Amanda Williams <pms@fu.com> wrote in
alt.atheism
"JakTheHammer" <jakthhmmr@aol.com> allegedly said in
news:1160076879.791667.128510@i3g2000cwc.googlegroups.com:
Rick wrote:
Given the amateurishness of it all, I'd suspect some kids did it.
Yup.......Lefties ARE Snot-Nosed, Smarmy Little Pudlicks...........
Hey JAK, you wanna know what rightards are eating... well looky here
http://www.rasmussenreports.com/2006/October%20Dailies/MarkFoley.htm
61% Believe Republican Leaders Have Been Protecting Foley
October 5, 2006
Sixty-one percent (61%) of American adults believe that Republican
leaders have been “protecting [Mark] Foley for several years.” A
Rasmussen Reports national opinion survey conducted Tuesday and
Wednesday nights shows that only 21% believe that the leadership “just
learn[ed] about Foley’s problems last week.”
The data supports speculation that this issue could have a devastating
impact on Republican prospects at the polls this fall. Even among
Republicans, 31% believe the GOP leadership has been protecting Foley.
Just under half (46%) of the GOP faithful believe that Congressional
leaders just learned about the problem.
Not surprisingly, Democrats overwhelmingly believe that the Republican
leaders have been protecting Foley for years (84% of Democrats hold that
view).
Perhaps more significant politically, 69% of those not affiliated with
either major party believe that leadership has been protecting Foley.
Only 9% of unaffiliated voters believe the GOP leaders just learned of
the problem last week. How much of an impact this will have on
individual Election 2006 races will not be known until our next round of
polling is complete.
Older Americans, those most likely to vote, are least likely to believe
that Republican leaders just learned about this issue.
The survey also found that just 45% of Americans would allow their son
or daughter to be a Congressional intern. Thirty-five percent (35%)
would not, while 20% are not sure. Higher-income Americans and Investors
are more likely than others to do so.
Sixty-one percent (61%) of Americans say they are following news of the
Foley story somewhat or very closely.
In response to a generic ballot question, 47% of Americans say they will
vote for a Democrat this November and 34% will vote for a Republican.
That 13-point advantage is up five from an eight-point edge held by
Democrats in August. See our Election 2006 page for polls on individual
Senate races. Our Senate Balance of Power summary shows 49 seats in the
Republican column at the moment and 49 for the Democrats.
The Foley issue has had little or no impact on President Bush’s Job
Approval ratings at this time.
/end
Very sad...
<snicker>
--
Fundies and trolls are cordially invited to
shove a wooden cross up their arses and rotate
at a high rate of speed. I trust you'll
be 'blessed' with a plethora of splinters.
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Kate" |
|
| Title: Re: **** DEMOCRATS EATING THEIR OWN ***** OVER FOLEY "SCANDAL"!! **** |
05 Oct 2006 03:34:26 PM |
|
|
JakTheHammer wrote:
Rick wrote:
Given the amateurishness of it all, I'd suspect some kids did it.
Yup.......Lefties ARE Snot-Nosed, Smarmy Little Pudlicks...........
What the ***** are you two pretending about?
Or did you actually believe todays republican talking points?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Michelle Malkin" |
|
| Title: Re: **** DEMOCRATS EATING THEIR OWN ***** OVER FOLEY "SCANDAL"!! **** |
06 Oct 2006 01:54:11 AM |
|
|
"Kate" <Kate@twoangryliberals.com> wrote in message
news:1160080466.447030.250240@h48g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
JakTheHammer wrote:
Rick wrote:
Given the amateurishness of it all, I'd suspect some kids did it.
Yup.......Lefties ARE Snot-Nosed, Smarmy Little Pudlicks...........
What the ***** are you two pretending about?
Or did you actually believe todays republican talking points?
Considering the newsgroups they come from, what
did you expect? They definitely aren't from alt.atheism.
--
^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^
Michelle Malkin (Mickey) aa list#1
BAAWA Knight & Bible Thumper Thumper
^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Rick" |
|
| Title: Re: **** DEMOCRATS EATING THEIR OWN ***** OVER FOLEY "SCANDAL"!! **** |
05 Oct 2006 04:02:58 PM |
|
|
Kate wrote in message
<1160080466.447030.250240@h48g2000cwc.googlegroups.com>...
JakTheHammer wrote:
Rick wrote:
Given the amateurishness of it all, I'd suspect some kids did it.
Yup.......Lefties ARE Snot-Nosed, Smarmy Little Pudlicks...........
What the ***** are you two pretending about?
Or did you actually believe todays republican talking points?
Just looking at the raw evidence. Maybe you haven't seen it. Maybe you
should look instead of spouting Democratic talking points.
- rick
.
|
|
|
| User: "Glorious Guardian of Good" |
|
| Title: Re: **** DEMOCRATS EATING THEIR OWN ***** OVER FOLEY "SCANDAL"!! **** |
05 Oct 2006 06:13:37 PM |
|
|
Rick wrote:
Kate wrote in message
<1160080466.447030.250240@h48g2000cwc.googlegroups.com>...
JakTheHammer wrote:
Rick wrote:
Given the amateurishness of it all, I'd suspect some kids did it.
Yup.......Lefties ARE Snot-Nosed, Smarmy Little Pudlicks...........
What the ***** are you two pretending about?
Or did you actually believe todays republican talking points?
Just looking at the raw evidence. Maybe you haven't seen it. Maybe you
should look instead of spouting Democratic talking points.
What "democratic talking points?"
If you weren't a hopeless RW idealogue, you'd realize that this is about
95% Goopers stepping in their own crap at this point. The Dems are,
essentially, sitting down and enjoying the popcorn.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Rick" |
|
| Title: Re: **** DEMOCRATS EATING THEIR OWN ***** OVER FOLEY "SCANDAL"!! **** |
05 Oct 2006 08:54:31 PM |
|
|
Glorious Guardian of Good wrote in message <452591a1$1_1@x-privat.org>...
Rick wrote:
Kate wrote in message
<1160080466.447030.250240@h48g2000cwc.googlegroups.com>...
JakTheHammer wrote:
Rick wrote:
Given the amateurishness of it all, I'd suspect some kids did it.
Yup.......Lefties ARE Snot-Nosed, Smarmy Little Pudlicks...........
What the ***** are you two pretending about?
Or did you actually believe todays republican talking points?
Just looking at the raw evidence. Maybe you haven't seen it. Maybe you
should look instead of spouting Democratic talking points.
What "democratic talking points?"
If you weren't a hopeless RW idealogue,
You're really trying to imitate Clave.
you'd realize that this is about
95% Goopers stepping in their own crap at this point. The Dems are,
essentially, sitting down and enjoying the popcorn.
- Rick
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Kate" |
|
| Title: Re: **** DEMOCRATS EATING THEIR OWN ***** OVER FOLEY "SCANDAL"!! **** |
05 Oct 2006 04:27:22 PM |
|
|
Rick wrote:
Kate wrote in message
<1160080466.447030.250240@h48g2000cwc.googlegroups.com>...
JakTheHammer wrote:
Rick wrote:
Given the amateurishness of it all, I'd suspect some kids did it.
Yup.......Lefties ARE Snot-Nosed, Smarmy Little Pudlicks...........
What the ***** are you two pretending about?
Or did you actually believe todays republican talking points?
Just looking at the raw evidence. Maybe you haven't seen it. Maybe you
should look instead of spouting Democratic talking points.
- rick
LOL - you got that from Drudge? Now that is just repug talking points.
Drudge is already backing off it. He never checks his sources. Next
time use a real news source rather than gossip from gay republican
agenda central.
ABC has already slapped him down.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Rick" |
|
| Title: Re: **** DEMOCRATS EATING THEIR OWN ***** OVER FOLEY "SCANDAL"!! **** |
05 Oct 2006 10:35:47 PM |
|
|
Kate wrote in message
<1160083642.795427.316130@b28g2000cwb.googlegroups.com>...
Rick wrote:
Kate wrote in message
<1160080466.447030.250240@h48g2000cwc.googlegroups.com>...
JakTheHammer wrote:
Rick wrote:
Given the amateurishness of it all, I'd suspect some kids did it.
Yup.......Lefties ARE Snot-Nosed, Smarmy Little Pudlicks...........
What the ***** are you two pretending about?
Or did you actually believe todays republican talking points?
Just looking at the raw evidence. Maybe you haven't seen it. Maybe you
should look instead of spouting Democratic talking points.
- rick
LOL - you got that from Drudge? Now that is just repug talking points.
Drudge is already backing off it.
I see no change in what he posted.
He never checks his sources. Next
time use a real news source rather than gossip from gay republican
agenda central.
ABC has already slapped him down.
Could you post a cite? I jsut went to their "Blotter" website and see
nothing of the sort.
Actually, I think you have it exactly backwards. The IMs they had were from
on 18 year old, not 16 as ABC originally claimed.
- Rick
.
|
|
|
| User: "Kate " |
|
| Title: Re: **** DEMOCRATS EATING THEIR OWN ***** OVER FOLEY "SCANDAL"!! **** |
06 Oct 2006 11:12:06 AM |
|
|
On Thu, 5 Oct 2006 22:35:47 -0500, "Rick"
<pl1_alpha_geek@juNOSPAM.com> wrote:
Kate wrote in message
<1160083642.795427.316130@b28g2000cwb.googlegroups.com>...
Rick wrote:
Kate wrote in message
<1160080466.447030.250240@h48g2000cwc.googlegroups.com>...
JakTheHammer wrote:
Rick wrote:
Given the amateurishness of it all, I'd suspect some kids did it.
Yup.......Lefties ARE Snot-Nosed, Smarmy Little Pudlicks...........
What the ***** are you two pretending about?
Or did you actually believe todays republican talking points?
Just looking at the raw evidence. Maybe you haven't seen it. Maybe you
should look instead of spouting Democratic talking points.
- rick
LOL - you got that from Drudge? Now that is just repug talking points.
Drudge is already backing off it.
I see no change in what he posted.
He never checks his sources. Next
time use a real news source rather than gossip from gay republican
agenda central.
ABC has already slapped him down.
Could you post a cite? I jsut went to their "Blotter" website and see
nothing of the sort.
http://blogs.abcnews.com/theblotter/2006/10/three_more_form.html
Actually, I think you have it exactly backwards. The IMs they had were from
on 18 year old, not 16 as ABC originally claimed.
Drudge can't be trusted. Why even bother quoting from him.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Bill Dunkenfield" |
|
| Title: Re: **** DEMOCRATS EATING THEIR OWN ***** OVER FOLEY "SCANDAL"!! **** |
06 Oct 2006 04:31:09 PM |
|
|
The only thing that will be "wiped off the map" are Republicans that can
not lead.
JAM
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "IAAH" |
|
| Title: Re: **** DEMOCRATS EATING THEIR OWN ***** OVER FOLEY "SCANDAL"!! **** |
05 Oct 2006 03:39:31 PM |
|
|
On 5 Oct 2006 13:34:26 -0700, "Kate" <Kate@twoangryliberals.com> wrote
in message <1160080466.447030.250240@h48g2000cwc.googlegroups.com>:
JakTheHammer wrote:
Rick wrote:
Given the amateurishness of it all, I'd suspect some kids did it.
Yup.......Lefties ARE Snot-Nosed, Smarmy Little Pudlicks...........
What the ***** are you two pretending about?
Or did you actually believe todays republican talking points?
Next comes a link to Drudge, who's now saying the whole thing was a
prank.
Yup, any Congressman resign over something that was only a prank,
right? Certainly any one of them would enter rehab, and warning the
pages about him was just another yuk, wasn't it?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Rick" |
|
| Title: Re: **** DEMOCRATS EATING THEIR OWN ***** OVER FOLEY "SCANDAL"!! **** |
05 Oct 2006 04:07:32 PM |
|
|
IAAH wrote in message ...
On 5 Oct 2006 13:34:26 -0700, "Kate" <Kate@twoangryliberals.com> wrote
in message <1160080466.447030.250240@h48g2000cwc.googlegroups.com>:
JakTheHammer wrote:
Rick wrote:
Given the amateurishness of it all, I'd suspect some kids did it.
Yup.......Lefties ARE Snot-Nosed, Smarmy Little Pudlicks...........
What the ***** are you two pretending about?
Or did you actually believe todays republican talking points?
Next comes a link to Drudge, who's now saying the whole thing was a
prank.
Yup, any Congressman resign over something that was only a prank,
right? Certainly any one of them would enter rehab, and warning the
pages about him was just another yuk, wasn't it?
Read more carefully. The explicit IMs were a prank. That's not hte whole
story, but it's more than enough to cause Foley career-ending embarrassment.
- Rick
- Rick
.
|
|
|
| User: "IAAH" |
|
| Title: Re: **** DEMOCRATS EATING THEIR OWN ***** OVER FOLEY "SCANDAL"!! **** |
05 Oct 2006 04:49:02 PM |
|
|
On Thu, 5 Oct 2006 16:07:32 -0500, "Rick"
<pl1_alpha_geek@juNOSPAM.com> wrote in message
<Kv2dnVZ9NIuG6bjYnZ2dnUVZ_oSdnZ2d@giganews.com>:
IAAH wrote in message ...
On 5 Oct 2006 13:34:26 -0700, "Kate" <Kate@twoangryliberals.com> wrote
in message <1160080466.447030.250240@h48g2000cwc.googlegroups.com>:
JakTheHammer wrote:
Rick wrote:
Given the amateurishness of it all, I'd suspect some kids did it.
Yup.......Lefties ARE Snot-Nosed, Smarmy Little Pudlicks...........
What the ***** are you two pretending about?
Or did you actually believe todays republican talking points?
Next comes a link to Drudge, who's now saying the whole thing was a
prank.
Yup, any Congressman resign over something that was only a prank,
right? Certainly any one of them would enter rehab, and warning the
pages about him was just another yuk, wasn't it?
Read more carefully. The explicit IMs were a prank. That's not hte whole
story, but it's more than enough to cause Foley career-ending embarrassment.
It doesn't matter if they were a prank or not, because Foley wasn't in
on it. He reacted honestly and skankily, in the same way that pervs
who think they're talking to 12-year-old girls who are actually vice
cops are reacting honestly.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Kate" |
|
| Title: Re: **** DEMOCRATS EATING THEIR OWN ***** OVER FOLEY "SCANDAL"!! **** |
05 Oct 2006 05:22:52 PM |
|
|
IAAH wrote:
On Thu, 5 Oct 2006 16:07:32 -0500, "Rick"
<pl1_alpha_geek@juNOSPAM.com> wrote in message
<Kv2dnVZ9NIuG6bjYnZ2dnUVZ_oSdnZ2d@giganews.com>:
IAAH wrote in message ...
On 5 Oct 2006 13:34:26 -0700, "Kate" <Kate@twoangryliberals.com> wrote
in message <1160080466.447030.250240@h48g2000cwc.googlegroups.com>:
JakTheHammer wrote:
Rick wrote:
Given the amateurishness of it all, I'd suspect some kids did it.
Yup.......Lefties ARE Snot-Nosed, Smarmy Little Pudlicks...........
What the ***** are you two pretending about?
Or did you actually believe todays republican talking points?
Next comes a link to Drudge, who's now saying the whole thing was a
prank.
Yup, any Congressman resign over something that was only a prank,
right? Certainly any one of them would enter rehab, and warning the
pages about him was just another yuk, wasn't it?
Read more carefully. The explicit IMs were a prank. That's not hte whole
story, but it's more than enough to cause Foley career-ending embarrassment.
It doesn't matter if they were a prank or not, because Foley wasn't in
on it. He reacted honestly and skankily, in the same way that pervs
who think they're talking to 12-year-old girls who are actually vice
cops are reacting honestly.
As usual, Drudge posts something totally made up
http://blogs.abcnews.com/theblotter/2006/10/three_more_form.html
.
|
|
|
| User: "stoney" |
|
| Title: Re: **** DEMOCRATS EATING THEIR OWN ***** OVER FOLEY "SCANDAL"!! **** |
09 Oct 2006 05:26:00 PM |
|
|
On 5 Oct 2006 15:22:52 -0700, "Kate" <Kate@twoangryliberals.com> wrote
in alt.atheism
IAAH wrote:
On Thu, 5 Oct 2006 16:07:32 -0500, "Rick"
<pl1_alpha_geek@juNOSPAM.com> wrote in message
<Kv2dnVZ9NIuG6bjYnZ2dnUVZ_oSdnZ2d@giganews.com>:
IAAH wrote in message ...
On 5 Oct 2006 13:34:26 -0700, "Kate" <Kate@twoangryliberals.com> wrote
in message <1160080466.447030.250240@h48g2000cwc.googlegroups.com>:
JakTheHammer wrote:
Rick wrote:
Given the amateurishness of it all, I'd suspect some kids did it.
Yup.......Lefties ARE Snot-Nosed, Smarmy Little Pudlicks...........
What the ***** are you two pretending about?
Or did you actually believe todays republican talking points?
Next comes a link to Drudge, who's now saying the whole thing was a
prank.
Yup, any Congressman resign over something that was only a prank,
right? Certainly any one of them would enter rehab, and warning the
pages about him was just another yuk, wasn't it?
Read more carefully. The explicit IMs were a prank. That's not hte whole
story, but it's more than enough to cause Foley career-ending embarrassment.
It doesn't matter if they were a prank or not, because Foley wasn't in
on it. He reacted honestly and skankily, in the same way that pervs
who think they're talking to 12-year-old girls who are actually vice
cops are reacting honestly.
As usual, Drudge posts something totally made up
http://blogs.abcnews.com/theblotter/2006/10/three_more_form.html
Three More Former Pages Accuse Foley of Online Sexual Approaches
October 05, 2006 5:20 PM
Brian Ross, Rhonda Schwartz & Maddy Sauer Report:
Three more former congressional pages have come forward to reveal what
they call "sexual approaches" over the Internet from former Congressman
Mark Foley.
The pages served in the classes of 1998, 2000 and 2002. They
independently approached ABC News after the Foley resignation through
the Brian Ross & the Investigative Team's tip line on ABCNews.com. None
wanted their names used because of the sensitive nature of the
communications.
"I was seventeen years old and just returned to [my home state] when
Foley began to e-mail me, asking if I had ever seen my page roommates
naked and how big their penises were," said the page in the 2002 class.
The former page also said Foley told him that if he happened to be in
Washington, D.C., he could stay at Foley's home if he "would engage in
oral sex" with Foley.
The page told ABC News he was interviewed this week by FBI agents who
had a six-page list of questions about Foley and the exchanges.
The second page who talked with ABC News, a graduate of the 2000 page
class, says Foley actually visited the old page dorm and offered rides
to events in his BMW.
"His e-mails developed into sexually explicit conversations, and he
asked me for photographs of my erect penis," the former page said.
The page said Foley maintained e-mail contact with him even after he
started college and arranged a sexual liaison after the page had turned
18.
The third page interviewed by ABC News, a graduate of the 1998 page
class, said Foley's instant messages began while he was a senior in high
school.
"Foley would say he was sitting in his boxers and ask what I was
wearing," the page said.
"It became more weird, and I stopped responding," the page said.
All three pages described similar instant message and e-mail patterns,
with remarkably similar escalations of provocative questions.
"He didn't want to talk about politics," the page said. "He wanted to
talk about sex or my penis," the page said.
The three new verbal accounts are in addition to two sets of sexually
explicit instant messages provided to ABC News by former pages.
An online story on the Drudge Report Thursday claimed one set of the
sexually explicit instant messages obtained by ABC News was part of a
"prank" on the part of the former page, who reportedly says he goaded
the congressman into writing the messages.
"This was no prank," said one of the three former pages who talked to
ABC News today about his experience with the congressman.
/end
How Christian of the Rethugs to continue with an attempted '***** screen'
in a lame attempt to 'muddy the waters.'
--
Fundies and trolls are cordially invited to
shove a wooden cross up their arses and rotate
at a high rate of speed. I trust you'll
be 'blessed' with a plethora of splinters.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "IAAH" |
|
| Title: Re: **** DEMOCRATS EATING THEIR OWN ***** OVER FOLEY "SCANDAL"!! **** |
05 Oct 2006 06:21:22 PM |
|
|
On 5 Oct 2006 15:22:52 -0700, "Kate" <Kate@twoangryliberals.com> wrote
in message <1160086972.423133.105200@e3g2000cwe.googlegroups.com>:
IAAH wrote:
On Thu, 5 Oct 2006 16:07:32 -0500, "Rick"
<pl1_alpha_geek@juNOSPAM.com> wrote in message
<Kv2dnVZ9NIuG6bjYnZ2dnUVZ_oSdnZ2d@giganews.com>:
IAAH wrote in message ...
On 5 Oct 2006 13:34:26 -0700, "Kate" <Kate@twoangryliberals.com> wrote
in message <1160080466.447030.250240@h48g2000cwc.googlegroups.com>:
JakTheHammer wrote:
Rick wrote:
Given the amateurishness of it all, I'd suspect some kids did it.
Yup.......Lefties ARE Snot-Nosed, Smarmy Little Pudlicks...........
What the ***** are you two pretending about?
Or did you actually believe todays republican talking points?
Next comes a link to Drudge, who's now saying the whole thing was a
prank.
Yup, any Congressman resign over something that was only a prank,
right? Certainly any one of them would enter rehab, and warning the
pages about him was just another yuk, wasn't it?
Read more carefully. The explicit IMs were a prank. That's not hte whole
story, but it's more than enough to cause Foley career-ending embarrassment.
It doesn't matter if they were a prank or not, because Foley wasn't in
on it. He reacted honestly and skankily, in the same way that pervs
who think they're talking to 12-year-old girls who are actually vice
cops are reacting honestly.
As usual, Drudge posts something totally made up
http://blogs.abcnews.com/theblotter/2006/10/three_more_form.html
Honestly, the amount of credence that I gave Drudge on this
was...small. He's usually quite dependably full of *****.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "stoney" |
|
| Title: Re: **** DEMOCRATS EATING THEIR OWN ***** OVER FOLEY "SCANDAL"!! **** |
09 Oct 2006 05:20:42 PM |
|
|
On 5 Oct 2006 12:34:39 -0700, "JakTheHammer" <jakthhmmr@aol.com> wrote
in alt.atheism
Rick wrote:
Given the amateurishness of it all, I'd suspect some kids did it.
Yup.......Lefties ARE Snot-Nosed, Smarmy Little Pudlicks...........
Bent and blunt projection noted, Asslick.
--
Fundies and trolls are cordially invited to
shove a wooden cross up their arses and rotate
at a high rate of speed. I trust you'll
be 'blessed' with a plethora of splinters.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
