| Topic: |
Religions > Atheism |
| User: |
"Mel" |
| Date: |
19 Mar 2005 01:39:14 PM |
| Object: |
Re: |
On 18 Mar 2005 12:27:11 -0800, wrote in message
<1111177631.510923.214250@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com>:
ducky could be used as a verb, too, as in 'ducky out of the question'
diana
you have a serious deficiency in your education. you need to learn English
or else you will remain white trash.
--
smash yer modem, reboot, kill yerself
Mel the Defiler
member, ATJ regs
webmaster of atjfaq.com
http://www.atjfaq.com/
.
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Re: |
19 Mar 2005 02:09:26 PM |
|
|
Mel wrote:
On 18 Mar 2005 12:27:11 -0800, wrote in
message
<1111177631.510923.214250@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com>:
ducky could be used as a verb, too, as in 'ducky out of the
question'
diana
you have a serious deficiency in your education. you need to learn
English
or else you will remain white trash.
--
smash yer modem, reboot, kill yerself
Mel the Defiler
member, ATJ regs
webmaster of atjfaq.com
http://www.atjfaq.com/
you say white trash like its a bad thing.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Mel" |
|
| Title: Re: |
20 Mar 2005 04:56:54 AM |
|
|
On 19 Mar 2005 06:09:26 -0800, wrote in message
<1111241366.836127.68400@l41g2000cwc.googlegroups.com>:
Mel wrote:
On 18 Mar 2005 12:27:11 -0800, wrote in
ducky could be used as a verb, too, as in 'ducky out of the
question'
diana
you have a serious deficiency in your education. you need to learn
English or else you will remain white trash.
you say white trash like its a bad thing.
white trash is lower than ***** *****.
--
smash yer modem, reboot, kill yerself
Mel the Defiler
member, ATJ regs
webmaster of atjfaq.com
http://www.atjfaq.com/
.
|
|
|
| User: "Douglas D. Anderson" |
|
| Title: Re: Re: |
20 Mar 2005 03:20:17 PM |
|
|
"Mel" <mel@atj.faq.com> wrote
white trash is lower than ***** *****.
People make that assumption because there is a general myth in the
colonies and former colonies that the black population was not in
a "civilized" environment previously, having come directly from what
is actually a Neolithic or early iron age culture, whereas the white
population must have come from a civilized background and thence
degenerated to a very low state. But this is not true, and is based
on our modern concepts of general access and mobility. In the
colonial days, the European countries provided three sorts or classes
of people, who were very rigidly caste-typed, namely aristocrats and
nobility, among whom were the powerful capitalists and entrepreneurs,
then the religious zealots, adventuring craftsmen and mercantilists, and
mercenary soldiers, and finally huge numbers of felons and wastrels,
collected from the prisons and gutters and sent off to be somewhere
else. The "white trash" of the colonies can generally trace their ancestors
back to those same expelled people. In the 18th and early 19th centuries
those people came from a background in which they had never been
civilized in the first place, the stubborn descendents of barbarians who
never became involved in the advancement of human culture. In the
United States, linguists have traced the "Ebonics" dialects back to
the white trash of Virginia, the pariahs of the English colonies who could
associate freely with the black slaves, from whom the slaves learned
English "culture" such as it was among a population of felons and
deportees. Those people still live in shacks and cabins in the back
hills and out of the way places, very little changed, although some
have moved into trailer parks, people referred to in this country as
"trailer trash".
.
|
|
|
| User: "Mel" |
|
| Title: "decent" women leave me cold |
21 Mar 2005 03:30:52 AM |
|
|
On Sun, 20 Mar 2005 15:20:17 GMT, "Douglas D. Anderson"
<dda@rr.rochester.com> wrote in message
<Rwg%d.105844$H05.61453@twister.nyroc.rr.com>:
"Mel" <mel@atj.faq.com> wrote
white trash is lower than ***** *****.
People make that assumption because there is a general myth in the
colonies and former colonies that the black population was not in
a "civilized" environment previously, having come directly from what
is actually a Neolithic or early iron age culture, whereas the white
population must have come from a civilized background and thence
degenerated to a very low state. But this is not true, and is based
on our modern concepts of general access and mobility. In the
colonial days, the European countries provided three sorts or classes
of people, who were very rigidly caste-typed, namely aristocrats and
nobility, among whom were the powerful capitalists and entrepreneurs,
then the religious zealots, adventuring craftsmen and mercantilists, and
mercenary soldiers, and finally huge numbers of felons and wastrels,
collected from the prisons and gutters and sent off to be somewhere
else. The "white trash" of the colonies can generally trace their ancestors
back to those same expelled people. In the 18th and early 19th centuries
those people came from a background in which they had never been
civilized in the first place, the stubborn descendents of barbarians who
never became involved in the advancement of human culture. In the
United States, linguists have traced the "Ebonics" dialects back to
the white trash of Virginia, the pariahs of the English colonies who could
associate freely with the black slaves, from whom the slaves learned
English "culture" such as it was among a population of felons and
deportees. Those people still live in shacks and cabins in the back
hills and out of the way places, very little changed, although some
have moved into trailer parks, people referred to in this country as
"trailer trash".
if it wasn't for trailer trash / white trash, there'd be no pr0n made.
the feminists (and religious) are clueless when they whine on about pr0n
exploiting women. if it wasn't for pr0n, all of white trash would have to
content themselves with earning minimum wage.
trust me, they want to be exploited.
all the feminist (and religious) argument achieves is a sense of guilt,
unworthiness and unhappiness amongst some of the women involved in adult
entertainment.
if we lived in a society where immorality was not merely tolerated, but
expected and encouraged, we'd prolly all be having a much better time.
dig the argument i've heard from some arseholes. they say something like,
"if it was your sister, mother, daughter etc. then you wouldn't like it.
blah blah." they just naturally assume that i think exactly like them and
that everyone else does too. no, i don't give a ***** if my 12 year old
daughter takes it up the ***** from a big black man on a pr0n vid.
and the other argument: "no man will want to marry a woman who's had sex
with other men before." wrong, again. the more men a woman has fucked, the
hornier it makes me when i ***** her too. virginal women do nothing for me.
i like immoral hot-***** sluts. i don't just like them in the sense of
satisfying my sexual needs and then i go marry a "decent" church-going
woman. i like them exclusively. i want nothing to do with the "decent"
non-sexual women. if the woman doesn't want to participate in orgies and get
nailed by 10 men in one night, then she's just another product of the
conservative Christian era we live in and I don't want her anywhere near me.
The President of the United States should be impeached if he is NOT getting
blow-jobs in the Oval Office.
"I swear to nail every hot ***** who comes into my office, so help me
Satan!"
[ all other opinions are worthless. ]
--
smash yer modem, reboot, kill yerself
Mel the Defiler
member, ATJ regs
webmaster of atjfaq.com
http://www.atjfaq.com/
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Sharon" |
|
| Title: Re: Re: |
21 Mar 2005 09:16:58 PM |
|
|
test
.
|
|
|
| User: "Richard" |
|
| Title: Re: Re: |
22 Mar 2005 03:17:14 PM |
|
|
Sharon wrote:
test
Aaaaaaarggggghhhhhhh!!!!
the atheists are coming!!! run for the hills!!!
--
http://www.capetownnews.info
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

|
Related Articles |
|
|