| Topic: |
Religions > Atheism |
| User: |
"Aquila Deus" |
| Date: |
08 Sep 2004 02:37:08 AM |
| Object: |
Re: Abortion = Terrorism |
Gactimus <gactimus@xrs.net> wrote in message news:<iuG311RlEHA.444@prospero.stardock.local>...
I think that after September 11, the American people are valuing life more
and we need policies to value the dignity and worth of every life. President
Bush has worked to say, let's be reasonable, let's work to value life, let's
reduce the number of abortions, let's increase adoptions. And I think those
are the kinds of policies the American people can support, particularly at a
time when we're facing an enemy and, really, the fundamental issue between us
and the terror network we fight is that we value every life.
So you support the baby's unlawful action to occupy in his mother's
body and suck her blood like a vampire?
I remember in america people are allowed to shoot invaders inside
their house, am I wrong?
.
|
|
| User: "Robibnikoff" |
|
| Title: Re: Abortion = Terrorism |
08 Sep 2004 07:01:48 AM |
|
|
"Aquila Deus" <aquila_deus@yahoo.co.uk> wrote in message
news:c5cfac8f.0409072337.3979f9fd@posting.google.com...
Gactimus <gactimus@xrs.net> wrote in message
news:<iuG311RlEHA.444@prospero.stardock.local>...
I think that after September 11, the American people are valuing life
more
and we need policies to value the dignity and worth of every life.
President
Bush has worked to say, let's be reasonable, let's work to value life,
let's
reduce the number of abortions, let's increase adoptions. And I think
those
are the kinds of policies the American people can support, particularly
at a
time when we're facing an enemy and, really, the fundamental issue
between us
and the terror network we fight is that we value every life.
So you support the baby's unlawful action to occupy in his mother's
body and suck her blood like a vampire?
I remember in america people are allowed to shoot invaders inside
their house, am I wrong?
Depends on the state. I know you can get away with it in Texas (a friend's
dad shot and killed an intruder in their home).
--
__________
Robyn
Resident Witchypoo
#1557
.
|
|
|
| User: "Aquila Deus" |
|
| Title: Re: Abortion = Terrorism |
08 Sep 2004 11:23:40 PM |
|
|
"Robibnikoff" <witchypoo@broomstick.com> wrote in message news:<2q8al8Fsjv92U1@uni-berlin.de>...
"Aquila Deus" <aquila_deus@yahoo.co.uk> wrote in message
news:c5cfac8f.0409072337.3979f9fd@posting.google.com...
Gactimus <gactimus@xrs.net> wrote in message
news:<iuG311RlEHA.444@prospero.stardock.local>...
I think that after September 11, the American people are valuing life
more
and we need policies to value the dignity and worth of every life.
President
Bush has worked to say, let's be reasonable, let's work to value life,
let's
reduce the number of abortions, let's increase adoptions. And I think
those
are the kinds of policies the American people can support, particularly
at a
time when we're facing an enemy and, really, the fundamental issue
between us
and the terror network we fight is that we value every life.
So you support the baby's unlawful action to occupy in his mother's
body and suck her blood like a vampire?
I remember in america people are allowed to shoot invaders inside
their house, am I wrong?
Depends on the state. I know you can get away with it in Texas (a friend's
dad shot and killed an intruder in their home).
So it should be legal to kill the baby, at least in Texas :)
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "somewriter" |
|
| Title: Re: Abortion = Terrorism |
08 Sep 2004 07:10:47 AM |
|
|
On Wed, 8 Sep 2004 08:01:48 -0400, "Robibnikoff"
<witchypoo@broomstick.com> wrote:
"Aquila Deus" <aquila_deus@yahoo.co.uk> wrote in message
news:c5cfac8f.0409072337.3979f9fd@posting.google.com...
Gactimus <gactimus@xrs.net> wrote in message
news:<iuG311RlEHA.444@prospero.stardock.local>...
I think that after September 11, the American people are valuing life
more
and we need policies to value the dignity and worth of every life.
President
Bush has worked to say, let's be reasonable, let's work to value life,
let's
reduce the number of abortions, let's increase adoptions. And I think
those
are the kinds of policies the American people can support, particularly
at a
time when we're facing an enemy and, really, the fundamental issue
between us
and the terror network we fight is that we value every life.
So you support the baby's unlawful action to occupy in his mother's
body and suck her blood like a vampire?
I remember in america people are allowed to shoot invaders inside
their house, am I wrong?
Depends on the state. I know you can get away with it in Texas (a friend's
dad shot and killed an intruder in their home).
Unlike here in Massachusetts...
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Gactimus" |
|
| Title: Re: Abortion = Terrorism |
08 Sep 2004 09:34:42 AM |
|
|
(Aquila Deus) wrote in
news:c5cfac8f.0409072337.3979f9fd@posting.google.com:
Gactimus <gactimus@xrs.net> wrote in message
news:<iuG311RlEHA.444@prospero.stardock.local>...
I think that after September 11, the American people are valuing life
more and we need policies to value the dignity and worth of every life.
President Bush has worked to say, let's be reasonable, let's work to
value life, let's reduce the number of abortions, let's increase
adoptions. And I think those are the kinds of policies the American
people can support, particularly at a time when we're facing an enemy
and, really, the fundamental issue between us and the terror network we
fight is that we value every life.
So you support the baby's unlawful action to occupy in his mother's
body and suck her blood like a vampire?
Your ignorance of reproductive biology is noted. The mother and baby do
not share blood. But, yes, I support an innocent unborn child's right to
live over the mother's right to be selfish.
I remember in america people are allowed to shoot invaders inside their
house, am I wrong?
I am reminded of the response of gay groups to AIDS: The Republicans, the
Reagan Administration, the congress, the public health organizations,
everybody other than those who were transmitting the disease were in some
malevolent way responsible for its spread -- and all the rest of us should
spend as much as necessary to find an immediate cure. Further, gays were
not to be inconvenienced by tracing of sexual contacts as is done with
other transmittable venereal diseases. When I got married a few years ago,
I was tested for syphilis, but not for AIDS.
With abortion, we see the same general tendencies. The fetus is equivalent
to a stranger barging into my house and demanding to be kept at my expense.
My acts are in no way relevant. I'm not responsible. The fetus is an
"invader", who may be "evicted" without qualm. Nice antiseptic word that:
"evicted". Eviction is, at worst, grabbing someone by the scruff of the
neck and tossing him out the door. It has nothing to do with dismemberment,
blood, poisoning with salt, piercing the skull, sucking out brains, and
violent death. And how about, "invader"? I can see them now: Legions of
tiny fetuses, planning their campaign of malicious intent to invade the
bodies of innocent, unsuspecting women; pouring over maps, books of
anatomy, consulting timetables, carefully recording time to bed, time of
sleep, prepositioning themselves so as to launch their "invasion" when the
innocent -- totally non-responsible -- women are sleeping! Come to think of
it, I believe I read where it was the Japanese who first discerned this
nefarious plot and that it provided the inspiration for the attack on Pearl
Harbor.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Aquila Deus" |
|
| Title: Re: Abortion = Terrorism |
08 Sep 2004 08:23:07 PM |
|
|
Gactimus <gactimus@xrs.net> wrote in message news:<chn5a2$kka$2@news1.usf.edu>...
aquila_deus@yahoo.co.uk (Aquila Deus) wrote in
news:c5cfac8f.0409072337.3979f9fd@posting.google.com:
Gactimus <gactimus@xrs.net> wrote in message
news:<iuG311RlEHA.444@prospero.stardock.local>...
I think that after September 11, the American people are valuing life
more and we need policies to value the dignity and worth of every life.
President Bush has worked to say, let's be reasonable, let's work to
value life, let's reduce the number of abortions, let's increase
adoptions. And I think those are the kinds of policies the American
people can support, particularly at a time when we're facing an enemy
and, really, the fundamental issue between us and the terror network we
fight is that we value every life.
So you support the baby's unlawful action to occupy in his mother's
body and suck her blood like a vampire?
Your ignorance of reproductive biology is noted. The mother and baby do
not share blood.
But he uses her mother's resource.
But, yes, I support an innocent unborn child's right to
live over the mother's right to be selfish.
And treat his mother as a slave? How cruel you are!
I remember in america people are allowed to shoot invaders inside their
house, am I wrong?
I am reminded of the response of gay groups to AIDS: The Republicans, the
Reagan Administration, the congress, the public health organizations,
everybody other than those who were transmitting the disease were in some
malevolent way responsible for its spread -- and all the rest of us should
spend as much as necessary to find an immediate cure. Further, gays were
not to be inconvenienced by tracing of sexual contacts as is done with
other transmittable venereal diseases. When I got married a few years ago,
I was tested for syphilis, but not for AIDS.
With abortion, we see the same general tendencies. The fetus is equivalent
to a stranger barging into my house and demanding to be kept at my expense.
My acts are in no way relevant. I'm not responsible. The fetus is an
"invader", who may be "evicted" without qualm. Nice antiseptic word that:
"evicted". Eviction is, at worst, grabbing someone by the scruff of the
neck and tossing him out the door. It has nothing to do with dismemberment,
blood, poisoning with salt, piercing the skull, sucking out brains, and
violent death. And how about, "invader"? I can see them now: Legions of
tiny fetuses, planning their campaign of malicious intent to invade the
bodies of innocent, unsuspecting women; pouring over maps, books of
anatomy, consulting timetables, carefully recording time to bed, time of
sleep, prepositioning themselves so as to launch their "invasion" when the
innocent -- totally non-responsible -- women are sleeping! Come to think of
it, I believe I read where it was the Japanese who first discerned this
nefarious plot and that it provided the inspiration for the attack on Pearl
Harbor.
But why should an unborn baby be treated as a human being in law??
He's "UNBORN"! His brain is undeveloped and he can't express his
feeling by any means, just like a braindead man. I think people who
can't think and express have no right because they're not complete
humans.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Gactimus" |
|
| Title: Re: Abortion = Terrorism |
08 Sep 2004 11:24:39 PM |
|
|
(Aquila Deus) wrote in
news:c5cfac8f.0409081723.2ec140d@posting.google.com:
Gactimus <gactimus@xrs.net> wrote in message
news:<chn5a2$kka$2@news1.usf.edu>...
(Aquila Deus) wrote in
news:c5cfac8f.0409072337.3979f9fd@posting.google.com:
Gactimus <gactimus@xrs.net> wrote in message
news:<iuG311RlEHA.444@prospero.stardock.local>...
I think that after September 11, the American people are valuing
life more and we need policies to value the dignity and worth of
every life. President Bush has worked to say, let's be reasonable,
let's work to value life, let's reduce the number of abortions,
let's increase adoptions. And I think those are the kinds of
policies the American people can support, particularly at a time
when we're facing an enemy and, really, the fundamental issue
between us and the terror network we fight is that we value every
life.
So you support the baby's unlawful action to occupy in his mother's
body and suck her blood like a vampire?
Your ignorance of reproductive biology is noted. The mother and baby do
not share blood.
But he uses her mother's resource.
Nice backpedal.
But, yes, I support an innocent unborn child's right to
live over the mother's right to be selfish.
And treat his mother as a slave? How cruel you are!
No more than many Siamese twins. Should one be allowed to kill the other?
I remember in america people are allowed to shoot invaders inside
their house, am I wrong?
I am reminded of the response of gay groups to AIDS: The Republicans,
the Reagan Administration, the congress, the public health
organizations, everybody other than those who were transmitting the
disease were in some malevolent way responsible for its spread -- and
all the rest of us should spend as much as necessary to find an
immediate cure. Further, gays were not to be inconvenienced by tracing
of sexual contacts as is done with other transmittable venereal
diseases. When I got married a few years ago, I was tested for
syphilis, but not for AIDS.
With abortion, we see the same general tendencies. The fetus is
equivalent to a stranger barging into my house and demanding to be kept
at my expense. My acts are in no way relevant. I'm not responsible.
The fetus is an "invader", who may be "evicted" without qualm. Nice
antiseptic word that: "evicted". Eviction is, at worst, grabbing
someone by the scruff of the neck and tossing him out the door. It has
nothing to do with dismemberment, blood, poisoning with salt, piercing
the skull, sucking out brains, and violent death. And how about,
"invader"? I can see them now: Legions of tiny fetuses, planning their
campaign of malicious intent to invade the bodies of innocent,
unsuspecting women; pouring over maps, books of anatomy, consulting
timetables, carefully recording time to bed, time of sleep,
prepositioning themselves so as to launch their "invasion" when the
innocent -- totally non-responsible -- women are sleeping! Come to
think of it, I believe I read where it was the Japanese who first
discerned this nefarious plot and that it provided the inspiration for
the attack on Pearl Harbor.
But why should an unborn baby be treated as a human being in law??
He's "UNBORN"! His brain is undeveloped and he can't express his
feeling by any means, just like a braindead man.
And a two month old baby. Maybe we should allow them to be killed as
well.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Aquila Deus" |
|
| Title: Re: Abortion = Terrorism |
09 Sep 2004 07:58:54 AM |
|
|
Gactimus <gactimus@xrs.net> wrote in message news:<Xns955F42BCC3FDXP@alaska.local>...
aquila_deus@yahoo.co.uk (Aquila Deus) wrote in
news:c5cfac8f.0409081723.2ec140d@posting.google.com:
Gactimus <gactimus@xrs.net> wrote in message
news:<chn5a2$kka$2@news1.usf.edu>...
aquila_deus@yahoo.co.uk (Aquila Deus) wrote in
news:c5cfac8f.0409072337.3979f9fd@posting.google.com:
Gactimus <gactimus@xrs.net> wrote in message
news:<iuG311RlEHA.444@prospero.stardock.local>...
I think that after September 11, the American people are valuing
life more and we need policies to value the dignity and worth of
every life. President Bush has worked to say, let's be reasonable,
let's work to value life, let's reduce the number of abortions,
let's increase adoptions. And I think those are the kinds of
policies the American people can support, particularly at a time
when we're facing an enemy and, really, the fundamental issue
between us and the terror network we fight is that we value every
life.
So you support the baby's unlawful action to occupy in his mother's
body and suck her blood like a vampire?
Your ignorance of reproductive biology is noted. The mother and baby do
not share blood.
But he uses her mother's resource.
Nice backpedal.
Thank you!
But, yes, I support an innocent unborn child's right to
live over the mother's right to be selfish.
And treat his mother as a slave? How cruel you are!
No more than many Siamese twins. Should one be allowed to kill the other?
for defense, yes. It's always good to destroy your enemy for defending
youself, whether your enemy is a brainless cockroach, a braindead
baby, or the hyper-brained god which looks like the huge, self-moving
brain in "Starship Troopers".
I remember in america people are allowed to shoot invaders inside
their house, am I wrong?
I am reminded of the response of gay groups to AIDS: The Republicans,
the Reagan Administration, the congress, the public health
organizations, everybody other than those who were transmitting the
disease were in some malevolent way responsible for its spread -- and
all the rest of us should spend as much as necessary to find an
immediate cure. Further, gays were not to be inconvenienced by tracing
of sexual contacts as is done with other transmittable venereal
diseases. When I got married a few years ago, I was tested for
syphilis, but not for AIDS.
With abortion, we see the same general tendencies. The fetus is
equivalent to a stranger barging into my house and demanding to be kept
at my expense. My acts are in no way relevant. I'm not responsible.
The fetus is an "invader", who may be "evicted" without qualm. Nice
antiseptic word that: "evicted". Eviction is, at worst, grabbing
someone by the scruff of the neck and tossing him out the door. It has
nothing to do with dismemberment, blood, poisoning with salt, piercing
the skull, sucking out brains, and violent death. And how about,
"invader"? I can see them now: Legions of tiny fetuses, planning their
campaign of malicious intent to invade the bodies of innocent,
unsuspecting women; pouring over maps, books of anatomy, consulting
timetables, carefully recording time to bed, time of sleep,
prepositioning themselves so as to launch their "invasion" when the
innocent -- totally non-responsible -- women are sleeping! Come to
think of it, I believe I read where it was the Japanese who first
discerned this nefarious plot and that it provided the inspiration for
the attack on Pearl Harbor.
But why should an unborn baby be treated as a human being in law??
He's "UNBORN"! His brain is undeveloped and he can't express his
feeling by any means, just like a braindead man.
And a two month old baby. Maybe we should allow them to be killed as
well.
Yes if you're blind and completely disabled. But you would probably be
killed first :D
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

|
Related Articles |
|
|