Religions > Atheism > Re: After Abortion the Mental Distress eliminated (was: Lasts for Years says New Study
| Topic: |
Religions > Atheism |
| User: |
"Karen Gordon" |
| Date: |
08 Dec 2006 09:56:44 PM |
| Object: |
Re: After Abortion the Mental Distress eliminated (was: Lasts for Years says New Study |
"J Young" (youngopinions@aol.com) writes:
(K): Lots of "new studies" coming in from the anti-abortion industry, isn't
there? Too bad they don't care about all the babies their right wing
governments are killing all over the world when they truly ARE 'babies'.
______________________________
The informed consent process has become a pawn in pro-life movement
efforts to restrict access to abortion.
Scientific evidence not withstanding, under the guise of a 'kinder and
gentler' approach in what have been called the 'abortion wars' (Solinger,
1998), the pro-life movement is waging a campaign around the world to
portray abortion as a threat to women's mental health. Such efforts
contribute to a larger strategy to undermine access to legal abortion that
involves subverting the informed consent process.
The campaign began in the United States, where successful construction of
a 'postabortion syndrome' could help political forces opposing abortion
overturn Roe v. Wade, the Supreme Court decision that legalized abortion,
by arguing that the Court failed to balance its concern for the negative
effects of unwanted pregnancy with the alleged "fact" that abortion is
detrimental to women's mental health.
In response to these allegations, the American Psychological Association
established a Task Force on Postabortion Emotional Reponses to examine the
issues. The Task Force reviewed the scientific literature and found no
scientific basis for such claims.
The Task Force did not view itself has having a vested interest in its
conclusions: indeed one could even argue that if abortion had been found
to be a widespread and severe risk to mental health, then psychologists
could argue for more funding to conduct research and provide psychological
services aimed at helping such women. Nonetheless, in order to avoid
charges of pro-choice bias in having come to their conclusion that the
scientific findings did not support portraying abortion as a severe threat
to public health, the initial report of the Task Force was submitted to
Science, an independent, highly respected scientific journal that accepted
it after an extensive peer review (Adler et al, 1990).
Other reviews of the literature, spanning nearly three decades, have come
to similar conclusions (e.g., Adler, 1990, 1992; National Academy of
Sciences, 1975; Schwartz, 1986; Russo, 1992; Russo & Denious 2000).
Despite a consistent consensus of scientific findings and failure to
justify 'postabortion syndrome' as a recognized psychiatric diagnosis,
pro-life advocates have turned to prolife legislators who craft bills
mandating informed consent scripts that exaggerate abortion's physical and
mental health risks while downplaying the risks of giving birth in blatant
disregard of research findings.
A disturbing illustration of the approach of some politicians involved in
these activities is found in the words of Illinois State Representative Dan
Reitz, who introduced a mandatory informed consent bill and when criticized
for its misleading context was reported in the March 12, 2001 edition of
Newsweek as saying: 'I'm not really sure about the science. My intent was
strictly about limiting abortion'.
By misrepresenting health risks, pro-life activists use fear to encourage
pregnant women to have unwanted births and to deter them from exercising
their legal right to an abortion. Such activities also attempt to deter
physicians from providing abortions by passing legislation making them
civilly and criminally liable for damages from such 'injuries'.
Although the pro-life campaign started in the United States, it is being
exported to other countries. For the last several years, a campaign to
construct 'postabortion syndrome' has progressed around the world,
including such countries as England, Scotland, Australia, New Zealand, and
Switzerland.
Recently, the campaign has been taken to a new level in Britain.
"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""
If men could get pregnant, abortion would be a sacrament
"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""
.
|
|
| User: "The Right One" |
|
| Title: Re: After Abortion the Mental Distress eliminated (was: Lasts for Years says New Study |
08 Dec 2006 11:36:31 PM |
|
|
"Karen Gordon" <ar231@FreeNet.Carleton.CA> wrote in message
news:eldc5s$k2i$1@theodyn.ncf.ca...
"J Young" (youngopinions@aol.com) writes:
(K): Lots of "new studies" coming in from the anti-abortion industry,
isn't
there? Too bad they don't care about all the babies their right wing
governments are killing all over the world when they truly ARE 'babies'.
______________________________
The informed consent process has become a pawn in pro-life movement
efforts to restrict access to abortion.
Scientific evidence not withstanding, under the guise of a 'kinder and
gentler' approach in what have been called the 'abortion wars' (Solinger,
1998), the pro-life movement is waging a campaign around the world to
portray abortion as a threat to women's mental health. Such efforts
contribute to a larger strategy to undermine access to legal abortion that
involves subverting the informed consent process.
The campaign began in the United States, where successful construction of
a 'postabortion syndrome' could help political forces opposing abortion
overturn Roe v. Wade, the Supreme Court decision that legalized abortion,
by arguing that the Court failed to balance its concern for the negative
effects of unwanted pregnancy with the alleged "fact" that abortion is
detrimental to women's mental health.
It didn't begain in the US. Euopena scientists have know all along that
abortion is a threat to a women's health. BTW do you have any personal
experiences that you would like to relate to this ng. It appears that most
pro-abortion women have never had an abortion. Every woman I have have
spoken to, who ahve gone throught the process wish they hadn't. All of them
suffer extreme guilt
In response to these allegations, the American Psychological Association
established a Task Force on Postabortion Emotional Reponses to examine the
issues. The Task Force reviewed the scientific literature and found no
scientific basis for such claims.
The APA is pro leftist. Many Psycologists dispute the claims of the APA.
The Task Force did not view itself has having a vested interest in its
conclusions: indeed one could even argue that if abortion had been found
to be a widespread and severe risk to mental health, then psychologists
could argue for more funding to conduct research and provide psychological
services aimed at helping such women. Nonetheless, in order to avoid
charges of pro-choice bias in having come to their conclusion that the
scientific findings did not support portraying abortion as a severe threat
to public health, the initial report of the Task Force was submitted to
Science, an independent, highly respected scientific journal that accepted
it after an extensive peer review (Adler et al, 1990).
Other reviews of the literature, spanning nearly three decades, have come
to similar conclusions (e.g., Adler, 1990, 1992; National Academy of
Sciences, 1975; Schwartz, 1986; Russo, 1992; Russo & Denious 2000).
Despite a consistent consensus of scientific findings and failure to
justify 'postabortion syndrome' as a recognized psychiatric diagnosis,
pro-life advocates have turned to prolife legislators who craft bills
mandating informed consent scripts that exaggerate abortion's physical and
mental health risks while downplaying the risks of giving birth in blatant
disregard of research findings.
A disturbing illustration of the approach of some politicians involved in
these activities is found in the words of Illinois State Representative
Dan
Reitz, who introduced a mandatory informed consent bill and when
criticized
for its misleading context was reported in the March 12, 2001 edition of
Newsweek as saying: 'I'm not really sure about the science. My intent was
strictly about limiting abortion'.
By misrepresenting health risks, pro-life activists use fear to encourage
pregnant women to have unwanted births and to deter them from exercising
their legal right to an abortion. Such activities also attempt to deter
physicians from providing abortions by passing legislation making them
civilly and criminally liable for damages from such 'injuries'.
Although the pro-life campaign started in the United States, it is being
exported to other countries. For the last several years, a campaign to
construct 'postabortion syndrome' has progressed around the world,
including such countries as England, Scotland, Australia, New Zealand, and
Switzerland.
Recently, the campaign has been taken to a new level in Britain.
"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""
If men could get pregnant, abortion would be a sacrament
"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""
The Roe vs Wade is still a sacriment with the feminazies, who have never had
an abortion. Roe wishes today that she had never take the issue to the
supreme cout.
--
Terry Pearson
http://www.rightpoint.org
Shaping Canada's Destiny
The liebranals are still leaderless!
.
|
|
|
| User: "Al Klein" |
|
| Title: Re: After Abortion the Mental Distress eliminated (was: Lasts for Years says New Study |
09 Dec 2006 07:16:11 PM |
|
|
On Sat, 09 Dec 2006 05:36:31 GMT, "The Right One" <tp@bush.usa> wrote:
BTW do you have any personal
experiences that you would like to relate to this ng. It appears that most
pro-abortion women have never had an abortion.
Do you have any? If not, Your opinions are worthless too, aren't
they?
Every woman I have have spoken to, who ahve gone throught the process
wish they hadn't. All of them suffer extreme guilt
Funny - every woman I've spoken with who has had an abortion has been
glad that she had the option. Not all of them were glad that they had
to end their pregnancies, but all of them were glad that they could
make the choice.
In response to these allegations, the American Psychological Association
established a Task Force on Postabortion Emotional Reponses to examine the
issues. The Task Force reviewed the scientific literature and found no
scientific basis for such claims.
The APA is pro leftist.
Actually the APA is neutral politically.
Many Psycologists dispute the claims of the APA.
Many of those have been discredited.
The Roe vs Wade is still a sacriment with the feminazies
And with all men who don't think of women as sperm receptacles.
Roe wishes today that she had never take the issue to the
supreme cout.
That's one woman - millions of women who have had abortions disagree
with her.
Your arguments from total stupidity hold no weight.
--
rukbat at optonline dot net
I cannot conceive of a god who rewards and punishes his creatures
or has a will of the kind that we experience in ourselves. Neither
can I nor would I want to conceive of an individual that survives
its physical death; let feeble souls, from fear or absurd egotism,
cherish such thoughts. I am satisfied with the mystery of the eter-
nity of life and a glimpse of the marvelous structure of the exist-
ing world, together with the devoted striving to comprehend a
portion, be it ever so tiny, of the Reason that manifests itself in
nature.
- Albert Einstein, as quoted in _Billions and Billions_, Carl Sagan.
(random sig, produced by SigChanger)
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Peter White" |
|
| Title: Re: After Abortion the Mental Distress eliminated (was: Lasts forYears says New Study |
08 Dec 2006 11:39:21 PM |
|
|
The Right One wrote:
"Karen Gordon" <ar231@FreeNet.Carleton.CA> wrote in message
news:eldc5s$k2i$1@theodyn.ncf.ca...
"J Young" (youngopinions@aol.com) writes:
(K): Lots of "new studies" coming in from the anti-abortion industry,
isn't
there? Too bad they don't care about all the babies their right wing
governments are killing all over the world when they truly ARE 'babies'.
______________________________
The informed consent process has become a pawn in pro-life movement
efforts to restrict access to abortion.
Scientific evidence not withstanding, under the guise of a 'kinder and
gentler' approach in what have been called the 'abortion wars' (Solinger,
1998), the pro-life movement is waging a campaign around the world to
portray abortion as a threat to women's mental health. Such efforts
contribute to a larger strategy to undermine access to legal abortion that
involves subverting the informed consent process.
The campaign began in the United States, where successful construction of
a 'postabortion syndrome' could help political forces opposing abortion
overturn Roe v. Wade, the Supreme Court decision that legalized abortion,
by arguing that the Court failed to balance its concern for the negative
effects of unwanted pregnancy with the alleged "fact" that abortion is
detrimental to women's mental health.
It didn't begain in the US. Euopena scientists have know all along that
abortion is a threat to a women's health. BTW do you have any personal
experiences that you would like to relate to this ng. It appears that most
pro-abortion women have never had an abortion.
A fact that your mother rues with deepest regret.
Every woman I have have
spoken to, who ahve gone throught the process wish they hadn't. All of them
suffer extreme guilt
In response to these allegations, the American Psychological Association
established a Task Force on Postabortion Emotional Reponses to examine the
issues. The Task Force reviewed the scientific literature and found no
scientific basis for such claims.
The APA is pro leftist. Many Psycologists dispute the claims of the APA.
The Task Force did not view itself has having a vested interest in its
conclusions: indeed one could even argue that if abortion had been found
to be a widespread and severe risk to mental health, then psychologists
could argue for more funding to conduct research and provide psychological
services aimed at helping such women. Nonetheless, in order to avoid
charges of pro-choice bias in having come to their conclusion that the
scientific findings did not support portraying abortion as a severe threat
to public health, the initial report of the Task Force was submitted to
Science, an independent, highly respected scientific journal that accepted
it after an extensive peer review (Adler et al, 1990).
Other reviews of the literature, spanning nearly three decades, have come
to similar conclusions (e.g., Adler, 1990, 1992; National Academy of
Sciences, 1975; Schwartz, 1986; Russo, 1992; Russo & Denious 2000).
Despite a consistent consensus of scientific findings and failure to
justify 'postabortion syndrome' as a recognized psychiatric diagnosis,
pro-life advocates have turned to prolife legislators who craft bills
mandating informed consent scripts that exaggerate abortion's physical and
mental health risks while downplaying the risks of giving birth in blatant
disregard of research findings.
A disturbing illustration of the approach of some politicians involved in
these activities is found in the words of Illinois State Representative
Dan
Reitz, who introduced a mandatory informed consent bill and when
criticized
for its misleading context was reported in the March 12, 2001 edition of
Newsweek as saying: 'I'm not really sure about the science. My intent was
strictly about limiting abortion'.
By misrepresenting health risks, pro-life activists use fear to encourage
pregnant women to have unwanted births and to deter them from exercising
their legal right to an abortion. Such activities also attempt to deter
physicians from providing abortions by passing legislation making them
civilly and criminally liable for damages from such 'injuries'.
Although the pro-life campaign started in the United States, it is being
exported to other countries. For the last several years, a campaign to
construct 'postabortion syndrome' has progressed around the world,
including such countries as England, Scotland, Australia, New Zealand, and
Switzerland.
Recently, the campaign has been taken to a new level in Britain.
"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""
If men could get pregnant, abortion would be a sacrament
"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""
The Roe vs Wade is still a sacriment with the feminazies, who have never had
an abortion. Roe wishes today that she had never take the issue to the
supreme cout.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Pete Dixon" |
|
| Title: Re: After Abortion the Mental Distress eliminated (was: Lasts for Years says New Study |
08 Dec 2006 11:57:08 PM |
|
|
Peter White said:
A fact that your mother rues with deepest regret.
I wish that the CBC had made a movie about people who were the opposite of Dr
Henry Morgentaler. It would have been fair and balanced, demonstrating the
love of human kind that anti-abortionist Atlanta Olympic stadium bomber Eric
Rudolph enjoyed when he killed 2 innocent people and injured 110.
That was before he used a deer hunting rifle and assassinated a man in his
kitchen who was having dinner with his family.
Yep. They're "pro life".
Aren't they?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Al Klein" |
|
| Title: Re: After Abortion the Mental Distress eliminated (was: Lasts for Years says New Study |
09 Dec 2006 07:17:16 PM |
|
|
On Sat, 9 Dec 2006 00:57:08 -0500, Pete Dixon
<petedixon_remove@yahoo.ca> wrote:
Peter White said:
A fact that your mother rues with deepest regret.
I wish that the CBC had made a movie about people who were the opposite of Dr
Henry Morgentaler. It would have been fair and balanced, demonstrating the
love of human kind that anti-abortionist Atlanta Olympic stadium bomber Eric
Rudolph enjoyed when he killed 2 innocent people and injured 110.
That was before he used a deer hunting rifle and assassinated a man in his
kitchen who was having dinner with his family.
Yep. They're "pro life".
Aren't they?
"Life" begins at conception ... and ends at birth.
--
rukbat at optonline dot net
"If anyone comes to me, and does not hate his father, mother, wife, brothers, and sisters and even himself, he cannot be my disciple."
Luke 14:26
(random sig, produced by SigChanger)
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

|
Related Articles |
|
|