On 1 Apr 2004 14:16:11 -0600, (Kate ), Message ID:
<40b377b7.364775421@news-west.newscene.com> wrote in alt.atheism;
On Thu, 01 Apr 2004 07:15:55 -0800, stoney <stoney@the.net> wrote:
On 29 Mar 2004 21:24:05 -0600,
(Kate ), Message ID:
<4089e7e3.131347515@news-west.newscene.com> wrote in alt.atheism;
On Mon, 29 Mar 2004 21:22:59 -0500, "Editor of EvilBible.com"
<Dont_Reply@Here.com> wrote:
"Llanzlan Klazmon The 15th" <Llanzlan@Llurdiaxorb.net> wrote in message
news:Xns94BC90F20875LlanzlanLlurdiaxorbn@203.97.37.6...
jimmyzed@sbcglobal.net (jimmyz) wrote in news:71396465.0403291628.350d1297
@posting.google.com:
I'm agnostic because I question the belief in a higher power.
If you don't believe in any gods then you are an atheist by definition.
There is no reason why you can't be both atheist and agnostic.
There are no reputable dictionary definitions that allow a person to be
defined as both an atheist and an agnostic.
The very link you cited defined an atheist as one who does not believe
in gods. What's your problem? Don't you read your own cites?
Shitcan him, Kate. You can demonstrate he's in error a 'million times'
and he'll continue in his rut.
Already done. :)
Don't forget to do the 'paper work'...... (eyes twinkle)
Stoney
"Designated Rascal and Rapscallion
and
SCAMPERMEISTER!"
When in doubt, SCAMPER about!
When things are fair, SCAMPER everywhere!
When things are rough, can't SCAMPER enough!
/end humour alert
alt.atheism military veteran #11
{so much for the 'no atheists in foxholes' rubbish}
.
