Re: An Atheist Disagrees with Mr. Clifton, AHH-GAIN



 Religions > Atheism > Re: An Atheist Disagrees with Mr. Clifton, AHH-GAIN

LINK TO THIS PAGE  


rating :  0   |  0


  Page 1 of 1

1

 
Topic: Religions > Atheism
User: ""
Date: 22 Jul 2006 02:33:33 PM
Object: Re: An Atheist Disagrees with Mr. Clifton, AHH-GAIN
wrote:

:|Hotel Charlie One wrote:
:|>
:|> Note" that does *not* say that "E Pluribus Unum"
:|> or anything else for that matter was not the national motto at that
:|> time.
:|
:|"AT PRESENT THE UNITED STATES HAS NO NATIONAL MOTTO."
:|
:|That sentence excludes the possibility that E Pluribus Unum was the
:|national motto.
:|
:|> The Newdow complaint goes on to say:
:|
:|Newdow's complaint is no authoritative source of any fact.
:|
:|As a matter of fact, his "In God We Trust" suit was rejected and
:|dismissed about a month ago.
:|
:|> 6 264. It should also be noted that the de facto motto of the United
:|> States was "E pluribus
:|> 7 unum" for the 180 years from 1776 until 1956.
:|
:|Notice that even Newdow has the integrity to call it the "de facto"
:|motto.
:|
:|Do you know what "de facto" means? It means that it is not official,
:|but generally accepted in practice.
:|
:|> This motto was
:|> chosen by a committee
:|> formed on July 4, 1776, whose members were none other than
:|> Benjamin Franklin, Thomas Jefferson and John Adams.
:|
:|Actually it was Pierre Eugène Du Simitière who proposed the motto for
:|the front of the seal, E Pluribus Unum. The mottos Franklin and
:|Jefferson derived on their own was "Rebellion to Tyrants is Obedience
:|to God." (so much for Jefferson not wanting to involve God in the
:|identity of the State)
:|
:|SOURCE: http://memory.loc.gov/ll/lljc/005/0200/02750690.gif
:|
:|Also, note that Franklin and Jefferson wanted the National Seal to
:|include a picture of Moses leading the Hebrews through the Red Sea with
:|God's presence guiding them, pursuant to the Bible.
:|
:|> 10 265. Now that's historic! Yet that motto - in place since its
:|> creation by a committee that had
:|> 11 its birth on the day we declared our independence, and that
:|> was comprised of three of
:|> 12 the most renowned and important architects of our
:|> constitutional democracy - was
:|> 13 discarded by Congress.
:|
:|Newdow is wrong. The motto wasn't discarded. That motto remains on the
:|front of the Seal, and consequently on the back of every one dollar
:|bill. It was never adopted as "the national motto." It was, with two
:|others, a motto adopted for the National Seal.
:|
:|> 14 266. This was done even though "an unbroken practice . . . is not
:|> something to be lightly cast
:|> 15 aside." Marsh v. Chambers, 463 U.S. 783, 790 (1983) (citing
:|> Walz v. Tax Comm'n, 397
:|> 16 U.S. 664, 678 (1970).
:|> 17 267. That no concern for "history" was heard from Congress when "E
:|> Pluribus Unum" was
:|> 18 replaced by "In God We Trust" shows clearly that the
:|> "history" justification is a mere
:|> 19 pretext.
:|
:|One of the most idiotic aspects of Newdow's complaint about discarding
:|a secular motto (E Pluribus Unum) with a religious one (In God We
:|Trust), is that E Pluribus Unum is only one of the three mottos on the
:|seal. Another motto found there, which was proposed and adopted by
:|those "founding architects" of the U.S. is Annuit Coeptis (latin for
:|"God has favored our beginning"). This continues to be printed on every
:|dollar bill.
:|
:|Sources:
:|U.S. Treasury
:|http://www.ustreas.gov/education/faq/currency/portraits.html#q3
:|U.S. Mint http://www.moneyfactory.com/document.cfm/18/120
:|U.S. State Department
:|http://www.state.gov/documents/organization/27807.pdf
:|
:|> > http://www4.law.cornell.edu/uscode/36/302.html
:|>
:|> Very good, that's what it is now. It says nothing about what the motto
:|> was before.
:|
:|Fine, show me a cite in the U.S. Code prior to 1956 that says the same
:|thing about E Pluribus Unum. If you can't, then its fair to say that In
:|God We Trust is the national motto IN A WAY THAT E PLURIBUS UNUM NEVER
:|WAS.
:|
:|> Specifically what is needed from you is another reference to say that
:|> we had *no* national motto before 1956.
:|
:|The reality is that there were a whole lot of mottos prior to 1956 that
:|were used in various places as phrases identifying the character of the
:|nation. Each of these is accurately identified as "A national motto"
:|but only one of them ever attained the official status as "THE national
:|motto."
:|
:|These mottos include, but are not limited to:
:|
:|Don't Tread On Me (used on the most prominent battle Flag when
:|independence was declared 1776)
:|Rebellion to Tyrants is Obedience to God (proposed by Jefferson &
:|Franklin, 1776)
:|Deo Favente (proposed by William Barton 1782)
:|E Pluribus Unum (used on the national seal 1782)
:|Unum E Pluribus (used on early U.S. coins)
:|Novus Ordo Seclorum (used on the national seal 1782)
:|Annuit Coeptis (used on the national seal 1782)
:|Libertas Americana (used on a gold coin proposed by Franklin, 1783)
:|Non Sine Diis Animosus Infans (used on a gold coin proposed by
:|Franklin, 1783)
:|Liberty (used on early coins 1793 and following)
:|Fugio (used on early coins 1787)
:|Mind Your Business (used on early coins 1787)
:|We are One (used on U.S. coin 1787)
:|In God is Our Trust (used in the national hymn, 1814)
:|In God We Trust (used on buttons @1834, coins 1864)
:|Maintain the Union (used on U.S. currency during the civil war)
:|
:|As all of these mottos were approved by the U.S. government to be used
:|as national identifiers on various official products of the government,
:|any one of them can be called a national motto, in a sense. But as far
:|as "THE *official* national motto" is concerned, the U.S. government
:|has only voted on ONE: to wit,
:|
:|http://www4.law.cornell.edu/uscode/36/302.html
:|
:|If you can show where the government adopted any other as *the*
:|national motto, I would be very interested to see your source.
:|Otherwise, "In God We Trust" did not *replace* any previous official
:|motto. The language of the 1956 bill was not in error.
:|
:|E Pluribus Unum was no more the unique one-and-only national motto than
:|Annuit Coeptis was. They both were national mottos. In God We Trust is
:|the first motto that is officially THE national motto.

From: buckeye-ELO - view profile
Date: Wed, Feb 4 2004 6:54 am
Groups: alt.atheism, alt.politics.usa.constitution,
alt.education, alt.religion.christian, alt.society.liberalism,
misc.education, alt.politics.usa.republican
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.society.liberalism/msg/f4ec081ab3357631?hl=en&
http://makeashorterlink.com/?X35B2127D
[excerpt]
[To]
ambrosesea...@yahoo.com (ambrose searle)
FROM ME:
The Two Mottos of the United States ....................510
E. Pluribus Unum...................................................510
In God We trust.....................................................514
I only copied pages 514 to 520
But I did copy the table of contents and that is where the above it from.
Carol at UWM copied the some if not all of the pages from 510 up
I will return to Regent today and copy the pages 510 to 514 as well so that
I have them also for some updating to the motto article on our web site.
So you see sonny, despite your huffing and puffing and denials and all that
game playing E. Pluribus Unum has been a National Motto of these here
United States. YOU GOT CAUGHT AGAIN
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FROM CAROL LEE SMITH
See page 510 of THE EAGLE AND THE SHIELD, previously mentioned in this
venue.
"As related in Chapter II, PIerre Eugene Du Simitiere, consultant to the
first committee on a device for a Great Seal, proposed a design that
included the motto <ital> E Pluribus Unum. <ital> That motto formed part
of the committee's report to Congress on August 20, 1776, and it carried
over into the deisgn Congress adopted on June 20, 1782. the device of the
obverse then adopted naturally became the coat of arms of the united
States (See Chapter XX), and the motto of the obverse became the motto of
the United States. On the beginning of government under the Constitution,
the act of Congress approved September 15, 1789, (1) which declared the
seal of 1782 to be the seal of the United States, in effect made the
device of the obverse the national coat of arms under the new regime and
its motto the national motto."
And on the next page:
"The motto <ital> E Plurbus Unum <ital> has appeard continuously since
1790 on the seals of the United States Supreme Court and the Department of
State, and for a varying number of years on the seals of the President,
the Vice President, the Senate, the States of Michigan and Wisconsin, and
the Virgin Islands. (8) It is inscribed also on the flag of North Dakota.
Implicit in such use is an understanding that the phrase is the motto of
the United States.
On American coins the phrase was used as early as 1786 on the New Jersey
<ital> Immunis Columbia <ital> cent; (9) and Totten pictures it on some
other coins of the Continental Contress period. (10) It was first used
by the United STates MInt on coins of the late 1790's, and it is on coins
of various issues from that time to the present. [begin page 512] An act
of Congress approved February 12, 1873, required that <ital> E Pluribus
Unum <ital> be placed on certain coins. (11)
"Noah Webster inserted the phrase in his dictionary in 1841, stating that
it was the motto of the United States; and until 1959 the successor
Merriam-Webster dictionaries so characterized it. The G. & C. Merriam
Company has written on the subject as follows: ... [if you want that, I
will key it in]"
"Thus for nearly 120 years a leading American reference book informed the
American people that the motto of their nation was <ital> E Pluribus Unum.
<ital.>
[If you want the footnotes, I will key them in]
Any typos are my fault, and are certainly not intentional.
If your library doesn't have THE EAGLE AND THE SHIELD (Dept. of State
American Revolution Bicentennial Adminstration), you can probably get it
through interlibrary loan.
***************************************************************
AND
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.education/browse_frm/thread/f88ce3213ca05104/f0d261bd31b47eaa?lnk=st&q=&rnum=3&hl=en#f0d261bd31b47eaa
http://makeashorterlink.com/?A2FA2127D
1
From: buckeye-ELO - view profile
Date: Tues, Jan 20 2004 6:18 am
Email: buckeye-...@nospam.net
Groups: alt.education, misc.education,
alt.religion.christian, alt.history, soc.history, alt.history.american,
alt.atheism, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
Not yet rated
Rating:
hide options
Reply | Reply to Author | Forward | Print | Individual Message | Show
original | Report Abuse | Find messages by this author
NATIONAL MOTTO
************************************************************
You are invited to check out the following:
The Rise of the Theocratic States of America
http://members.tripod.com/~candst/theocracy.htm
American Theocrats - Past and Present
http://members.tripod.com/~candst/theocrats.htm
The Constitutional Principle: Separation of Church and State
http://members.tripod.com/~candst/index.html
[and to join the discussion group for the above site and/or Separation of
Church and State in general, listed below]
HRSepCnS · Hampton Roads [Virginia] SepChurch&State
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/HRSepCnS/
[Its not just Hampton Roads folks who are members, there are members from
all over the US and a couple from overseas as well]
***************************************************************
.. . . You can't understand a phrase such as "Congress shall make no law
respecting an establishment of religion" by syllogistic reasoning. Words
take their meaning from social as well as textual contexts, which is why "a
page of history is worth a volume of logic." New York Trust Co. v. Eisner,
256 U.S. 345, 349, 41 S.Ct. 506, 507, 65 L.Ed. 963 (1921) (Holmes, J.).
Sherman v. Community Consol. Dist. 21, 980 F.2d 437, 445 (7th Cir. 1992)
.. . .
****************************************************************
USAF LT. COL (Ret) Buffman (Glen P. Goffin) wrote
"You pilot always into an unknown future;
facts are your only clue. Get the facts!"
That philosophy 'snipit' helped to get me, and my crew, through a good
many combat missions and far too many scary, inflight, emergencies.
It has also played a significant role in helping me to expose the
plethora of radical Christian propaganda and lies that we find at
almost every media turn.
*****************************************************************
THE CONSTITUTIONAL PRINCIPLE:
SEPARATION OF CHURCH AND STATE

http://members.tripod.com/~candst/index.html
****************************************************************
.

User: ""

Title: Re: An Atheist Disagrees with Mr. Clifton, AHH-GAIN 22 Jul 2006 02:45:01 PM
wrote:


So you see sonny, despite your huffing and puffing and denials and all that
game playing E. Pluribus Unum has been a National Motto of these here
United States. YOU GOT CAUGHT AGAIN

I see you haven't changed your imbecilic M.O.--viz., responding
recklessly to a post, that you haven't even read, with mountains of
tangential information.
There is a big difference, smart guy, between *a* motto of these United
States (your words above), and *THE* motto of the United States
I posted this above in the post you failed to read before you
responded... but here it goes again. I'm sure this won't be the last
time I'll have to post this, because you seem to think that by posting
something irrelevant over and over and over again somehow makes it
relevant and valid. It doesn't.
The reality is that there were a whole lot of mottos prior to 1956 that
were used in various places as phrases identifying the character of the
nation. Each of these is accurately identified as "A national motto"
but only one of them ever attained the official status as "THE national
motto."
These mottos include, but are not limited to:
Don't Tread On Me (used on the most prominent battle Flag when
independence was declared 1776)
Rebellion to Tyrants is Obedience to God (proposed by Jefferson &
Franklin, 1776)
Deo Favente (proposed by William Barton 1782)
E Pluribus Unum (used on the national seal 1782)
Unum E Pluribus (used on early U.S. coins)
Novus Ordo Seclorum (used on the national seal 1782)
Annuit Coeptis (used on the national seal 1782)
Libertas Americana (used on a gold coin proposed by Franklin, 1783)
Non Sine Diis Animosus Infans (used on a gold coin proposed by
Franklin, 1783)
Liberty (used on early coins 1793 and following)
Fugio (used on early coins 1787)
Mind Your Business (used on early coins 1787)
We are One (used on U.S. coin 1787)
In God is Our Trust (used in the national hymn, 1814)
In God We Trust (used on buttons @1834, coins 1864)
Maintain the Union (used on U.S. currency during the civil war)
As all of these mottos were approved by the U.S. government to be used
as national identifiers on various official products of the government,
any one of them can be called a national motto, in a sense. But as far
as "THE *official* national motto" is concerned, the U.S. government
has only voted on ONE: to wit,
http://www4.law.cornell.edu/uscode/36/302.html
If you can show where the government adopted any other as *the*
national motto, I would be very interested to see your source.
Otherwise, "In God We Trust" did not *replace* any previous official
motto. The language of the 1956 bill was not in error.
E Pluribus Unum was no more the unique one-and-only national motto than
Annuit Coeptis was. They both were national mottos. In God We Trust is
the first motto that is officially THE national motto.
.
User: "Bob LeChevalier"

Title: Re: An Atheist Disagrees with Mr. Clifton, AHH-GAIN 22 Jul 2006 05:13:33 PM
wrote:

buckeye-elo@nospam.net wrote:


So you see sonny, despite your huffing and puffing and denials and all that
game playing E. Pluribus Unum has been a National Motto of these here
United States. YOU GOT CAUGHT AGAIN


I see you haven't changed your imbecilic M.O.--viz., responding
recklessly to a post, that you haven't even read, with mountains of
tangential information.

There is a big difference, smart guy, between *a* motto of these United
States (your words above), and *THE* motto of the United States

Not really.
In order for there to be a significant difference, "THE" motto would
have to be exclusive of all other mottos. But in fact, E Pluribus and
the other mottos are STILL on the Great Seal and thus are STILL
"national mottos".
"THE" implies a singular when in fact national mottos of the United
States is inherently a plural noun, and no act of Congress can change
that without eliminating all of the other mottos from any use
whatsoever to represent the US (indeed the mottos on the Great Seal,
which is in fact a symbol of the US in many arenas) are arguably
serving more as national mottos than "THE" national motto, which
pretty much only appears on money.

nation. Each of these is accurately identified as "A national motto"
but only one of them ever attained the official status as "THE national
motto."

Adopting a motto as "THE" national motto while retaining other
national mottos in official use, is an exercise in political semantics
(as are many of your arguments).
lojbab
.
User: ""

Title: Re: An Atheist Disagrees with Mr. Clifton, AHH-GAIN 25 Jul 2006 10:47:12 AM
Bob LeChevalier <lojbab@lojban.org> wrote:

:|Adopting a motto as "THE" national motto while retaining other
:|national mottos in official use, is an exercise in political semantics
:|(as are many of your arguments).
:|
:|lojbab

That is what he is about, silly little games and game playing.
Has been since Feb 1999
***************************************************************
You are invited to check out the following:
The Rise of the Theocratic States of America
http://members.tripod.com/~candst/theocracy.htm
American Theocrats - Past and Present
http://members.tripod.com/~candst/theocrats.htm
The Constitutional Principle: Separation of Church and State
http://members.tripod.com/~candst/index.html
[and to join the discussion group for the above site and/or Separation of
Church and State in general, listed below]
HRSepCnS · Hampton Roads [Virginia] SepChurch&State
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/HRSepCnS/
[Its not just Hampton Roads folks who are members, there are members from
all over the US and a couple from overseas as well]
***************************************************************
.. . . You can't understand a phrase such as "Congress shall make no law
respecting an establishment of religion" by syllogistic reasoning. Words
take their meaning from social as well as textual contexts, which is why "a
page of history is worth a volume of logic." New York Trust Co. v. Eisner,
256 U.S. 345, 349, 41 S.Ct. 506, 507, 65 L.Ed. 963 (1921) (Holmes, J.).
Sherman v. Community Consol. Dist. 21, 980 F.2d 437, 445 (7th Cir. 1992)
.. . .
****************************************************************
USAF LT. COL (Ret) Buffman (Glen P. Goffin) wrote
"You pilot always into an unknown future;
facts are your only clue. Get the facts!"
That philosophy 'snipit' helped to get me, and my crew, through a good
many combat missions and far too many scary, inflight, emergencies.
It has also played a significant role in helping me to expose the
plethora of radical Christian propaganda and lies that we find at
almost every media turn.
*****************************************************************
THE CONSTITUTIONAL PRINCIPLE:
SEPARATION OF CHURCH AND STATE

http://members.tripod.com/~candst/index.html
****************************************************************
.

User: ""

Title: Re: An Atheist Disagrees with Mr. Clifton, AHH-GAIN 23 Jul 2006 01:24:23 AM
Bob LeChevalier wrote:


There is a big difference, smart guy, between *a* motto of these United
States (your words above), and *THE* motto of the United States


Not really.

In order for there to be a significant difference, "THE" motto would
have to be exclusive of all other mottos. But in fact, E Pluribus and
the other mottos are STILL on the Great Seal and thus are STILL
"national mottos".

Shockingly, I think I am in agreement with you here.
This is essentially why Newdow and Allison are in error when they say
that E Pluribus Unum has been "discarded."
(http://www.restorethepledge.com/litigation/money/docs/2005-11-18%20IGWT%20Complaint.pdf)
E Pluribus and the other mottos are still national mottos. In God We
Trust did not nullify any of them. And yet, the Federal Law remains
rather narrow:
http://www4.law.cornell.edu/uscode/36/302.html
.




  Page 1 of 1

1

 


Related Articles
Re: An Atheist Disagrees with Mr. Clifton, AHH-GAIN
Re: An Atheist Disagrees with Mr. Clifton, AHH-GAIN
Re: An Atheist Disagrees with Mr. Clifton, AHH-GAIN
Re: An Atheist Disagrees with Mr. Clifton, AHH-GAIN
Re: An Atheist Disagrees with Mr. Clifton, AHH-GAIN
Re: An Atheist Disagrees with Mr. Clifton, AHH-GAIN
Re: An Atheist Disagrees with Mr. Clifton, AHH-GAIN
Re: Will YOU please, support my rise to speak publicly challenging anyone who disagrees with me, GEORGE WALKER BUSH needs to be arrested immediately for 911 - CNN CBC FOXNEWS ARE LYING DEMON ENEMY BETRAYERS TO US HUMANS: DEMAND JUSTICE FOR COPS - DEM
Florida's Alex Vangel on murdering folks he disagrees with
Re: OT: A Communist Life With No Apology
OT: Even with $200m to spend, Bush still looks vulnerable
How Conversations with Atheists Pan Out
OT: Site with beer recipes
Christian Zionists with a hand on the steering wheel of Bush's foreign policy
Insane Christian killer with his thumb on the button
 

NEWER

pg.3585     pg.2749     pg.2106     pg.1612     pg.1232     pg.940     pg.716     pg.544     pg.412     pg.311     pg.234     pg.175     pg.130     pg.96     pg.70     pg.50     pg.35     pg.24     pg.16     pg.10     pg.6     pg.3     pg.1

OLDER