| Topic: |
Religions > Atheism |
| User: |
"david ford" |
| Date: |
16 Aug 2006 07:37:30 AM |
| Object: |
Re: Ann Coulter, holocaust |
wrote:
Question: Is it fair to say that Ann Coulter is a holocaust
revisionist?
Of course, she doesn't deny that the holocaust occurred, but she
puts the blame on "Darwinism",
Multi-Pronged Role of Darwinian Thought in Shoah's Arrival
http://www.google.com/groups?selm=dford3-1132080322.482544.299440%40g49g2000cwa.googlegroups.com
Hitler's actions make sense given his atheism and eugenic, social
Darwinist vision
http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=dford3-1134145559.645139.229550%40f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com
is Darwin, or Hitler, today's most-famous Darwinist?
http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=dford3-1138681336.761356.170100%40z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com
and doesn't even mention the
notorious (and amply documented) anti-semitism of certain Christian
churches.
Luther's and Hitler's antis- were very different
http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=dford3-1149000825.650983.94540%40j73g2000cwa.googlegroups.com
////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
1859 Darwin vs. the Judeo-Christian conception of the unity of man
http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=dford3-1120016676.023811.113660%40g47g2000cwa.googlegroups.com
agree with Hitler about who 'Jews' are?
http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=dford3-1136226458.258397.34490%40o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com
'Mein Kampf means "My Struggle," which Hitler described in
unmistakably Darwinian terms.'
Darwin, Charles. 1859. _On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural
Selection, or the Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for
Life_ (London: John Murray), 513pp.
1940 Nazi film "All Life is Struggle" embraced Darwinian natural
selection
http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=b1c67abe.0407042043.1c2ccf1f%40posting.google.com
Hitler & Darwin URLs
http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=dford3-1140576033.123225.228290%40o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com
Draft 2 of a chronology of Darwinian thought and the march to the Final
Solution
http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=dford3-1122434358.640904.162640%40z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com
Ann Coulter in "Godless, The Church of Liberalism"
.
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Ann Coulter, holocaust |
16 Aug 2006 10:02:57 AM |
|
|
david ford wrote:
indriko@yahoo.com wrote:
Question: Is it fair to say that Ann Coulter is a holocaust
revisionist?
Of course, she doesn't deny that the holocaust occurred, but she
puts the blame on "Darwinism",
Multi-Pronged Role of Darwinian Thought in Shoah's Arrival
http://www.google.com/groups?selm=dford3-1132080322.482544.299440%40g49g2000cwa.googlegroups.com
Hitler's actions make sense given his atheism and eugenic, social
Darwinist vision
http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=dford3-1134145559.645139.229550%40f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com
is Darwin, or Hitler, today's most-famous Darwinist?
http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=dford3-1138681336.761356.170100%40z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com
[shnip]
It's nice that the thread I started has generated some interesting
responses, but I'm disappointed that I haven't seen any answers
to my original question. It wasn't just a rhetorical question. I'd
really
like to know what people think about this issue.
In light of David Ford's post, I'd like to modify my question:
Is it fair to say that Ann Coulter and David Ford are
holocaust revisionists?
Anxiously awaiting opinions,
Cleve
.
|
|
|
| User: "Neil Harrington" |
|
| Title: Re: Ann Coulter, holocaust |
16 Aug 2006 11:47:21 AM |
|
|
<indriko@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1155740577.096153.182630@m79g2000cwm.googlegroups.com...
david ford wrote:
indriko@yahoo.com wrote:
Question: Is it fair to say that Ann Coulter is a holocaust
revisionist?
Of course, she doesn't deny that the holocaust occurred, but she
puts the blame on "Darwinism",
Multi-Pronged Role of Darwinian Thought in Shoah's Arrival
http://www.google.com/groups?selm=dford3-1132080322.482544.299440%40g49g2000cwa.googlegroups.com
Hitler's actions make sense given his atheism and eugenic, social
Darwinist vision
http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=dford3-1134145559.645139.229550%40f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com
is Darwin, or Hitler, today's most-famous Darwinist?
http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=dford3-1138681336.761356.170100%40z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com
[shnip]
It's nice that the thread I started has generated some interesting
responses, but I'm disappointed that I haven't seen any answers
to my original question. It wasn't just a rhetorical question. I'd
really
like to know what people think about this issue.
In light of David Ford's post, I'd like to modify my question:
Is it fair to say that Ann Coulter and David Ford are
holocaust revisionists?
Anxiously awaiting opinions,
Cleve
I don't know anything about David Ford, but how is Ann Coulter a Holocaust
revisionist? I read her column regularly, and as far as I can see she's a
thorough believer in the Holocaust orthodoxy. At least, I have never seen
her write anything but negatives about "Holocaust deniers." Have I missed
something?
I didn't see your original question. (I only read this newsgroup from time
to time.)
Neil
.
|
|
|
| User: "Pastor Kutchie" |
|
| Title: Re: Ann Coulter, holocaust |
16 Aug 2006 02:21:24 PM |
|
|
Neil Harrington wrote:
<indriko@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1155740577.096153.182630@m79g2000cwm.googlegroups.com...
david ford wrote:
indriko@yahoo.com wrote:
Question: Is it fair to say that Ann Coulter is a holocaust
revisionist?
Of course, she doesn't deny that the holocaust occurred, but she
puts the blame on "Darwinism",
Multi-Pronged Role of Darwinian Thought in Shoah's Arrival
http://www.google.com/groups?selm=dford3-1132080322.482544.299440%40g49g2000cwa.googlegroups.com
Hitler's actions make sense given his atheism and eugenic, social
Darwinist vision
http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=dford3-1134145559.645139.229550%40f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com
is Darwin, or Hitler, today's most-famous Darwinist?
http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=dford3-1138681336.761356.170100%40z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com
[shnip]
It's nice that the thread I started has generated some interesting
responses, but I'm disappointed that I haven't seen any answers
to my original question. It wasn't just a rhetorical question. I'd
really
like to know what people think about this issue.
In light of David Ford's post, I'd like to modify my question:
Is it fair to say that Ann Coulter and David Ford are
holocaust revisionists?
Anxiously awaiting opinions,
Cleve
I don't know anything about David Ford, but how is Ann Coulter a Holocaust
revisionist? I read her column regularly, and as far as I can see she's a
thorough believer in the Holocaust orthodoxy. At least, I have never seen
her write anything but negatives about "Holocaust deniers." Have I missed
something?
I didn't see your original question. (I only read this newsgroup from time
to time.)
Neil
This is the confusion that ensues when fuckwits try to be clever. It
started with Ann Coulter trying to be clever. She isn't, David Ford
isn't and all the fuckwits developed this argument in between aren't
either.
Here's the bottom line: Ann Coulter is trying to regurgitate some well
worn Cretinist lie in her own idiom, calumnising the scientific
community by associating evolutionary science with Nazism. End of.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Gray Shockley" |
|
| Title: Re: Ann Coulter, holocaust |
19 Aug 2006 06:51:55 PM |
|
|
On Wed, 16 Aug 2006 14:21:24 -0500, Pastor Kutchie wrote
(in article <1155756084.007315.74130@m79g2000cwm.googlegroups.com>):
Neil Harrington wrote:
<indriko@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1155740577.096153.182630@m79g2000cwm.googlegroups.com...
david ford wrote:
indriko@yahoo.com wrote:
Question: Is it fair to say that Ann Coulter is a holocaust
revisionist?
Of course, she doesn't deny that the holocaust occurred, but she
puts the blame on "Darwinism",
Multi-Pronged Role of Darwinian Thought in Shoah's Arrival
http://www.google.com/groups?selm=dford3-1132080322.482544.299440%40g49g20
00cwa.googlegroups.com
Hitler's actions make sense given his atheism and eugenic, social
Darwinist vision
http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=dford3-1134145559.645139.229550%40f14
g2000cwb.googlegroups.com
is Darwin, or Hitler, today's most-famous Darwinist?
http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=dford3-1138681336.761356.170100%40z14
g2000cwz.googlegroups.com
[shnip]
It's nice that the thread I started has generated some interesting
responses, but I'm disappointed that I haven't seen any answers
to my original question. It wasn't just a rhetorical question. I'd
really
like to know what people think about this issue.
In light of David Ford's post, I'd like to modify my question:
Is it fair to say that Ann Coulter and David Ford are
holocaust revisionists?
Anxiously awaiting opinions,
Cleve
I don't know anything about David Ford, but how is Ann Coulter a Holocaust
revisionist? I read her column regularly, and as far as I can see she's a
thorough believer in the Holocaust orthodoxy. At least, I have never seen
her write anything but negatives about "Holocaust deniers." Have I missed
something?
I didn't see your original question. (I only read this newsgroup from time
to time.)
Neil
This is the confusion that ensues when fuckwits try to be clever. It
started with Ann Coulter trying to be clever. She isn't, David Ford
isn't and all the fuckwits developed this argument in between aren't
either.
Here's the bottom line: Ann Coulter is trying to regurgitate some well
worn Cretinist lie in her own idiom, calumnising the scientific
community by associating evolutionary science with Nazism. End of.
Oh, come now. Ann Coulter is just Pat Buchanan in drag.
Watch for a religious trek to the cemetery at Bitburg
to honor her/his "victims" anytime now.
Gray Shockley
------------------
... a government committed to a policy of
improving the nation by improving the condition
of some of the individuals will eventually run
into trouble in attempting to distinguish between
a national good and a chocolate sundae.
- E. B. White
.
|
|
|
| User: "Neil Harrington" |
|
| Title: Re: Ann Coulter, holocaust |
20 Aug 2006 07:58:43 AM |
|
|
"Gray Shockley" <grayshockley@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:0001HW.C10D0E4B00048FE6F0284530@news.giganews.com...
On Wed, 16 Aug 2006 14:21:24 -0500, Pastor Kutchie wrote
(in article <1155756084.007315.74130@m79g2000cwm.googlegroups.com>):
Neil Harrington wrote:
<indriko@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1155740577.096153.182630@m79g2000cwm.googlegroups.com...
david ford wrote:
indriko@yahoo.com wrote:
Question: Is it fair to say that Ann Coulter is a holocaust
revisionist?
Of course, she doesn't deny that the holocaust occurred, but she
puts the blame on "Darwinism",
Multi-Pronged Role of Darwinian Thought in Shoah's Arrival
http://www.google.com/groups?selm=dford3-1132080322.482544.299440%40g49g20
00cwa.googlegroups.com
Hitler's actions make sense given his atheism and eugenic, social
Darwinist vision
http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=dford3-1134145559.645139.229550%40f14
g2000cwb.googlegroups.com
is Darwin, or Hitler, today's most-famous Darwinist?
http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=dford3-1138681336.761356.170100%40z14
g2000cwz.googlegroups.com
[shnip]
It's nice that the thread I started has generated some interesting
responses, but I'm disappointed that I haven't seen any answers
to my original question. It wasn't just a rhetorical question. I'd
really
like to know what people think about this issue.
In light of David Ford's post, I'd like to modify my question:
Is it fair to say that Ann Coulter and David Ford are
holocaust revisionists?
Anxiously awaiting opinions,
Cleve
I don't know anything about David Ford, but how is Ann Coulter a
Holocaust
revisionist? I read her column regularly, and as far as I can see she's
a
thorough believer in the Holocaust orthodoxy. At least, I have never
seen
her write anything but negatives about "Holocaust deniers." Have I
missed
something?
I didn't see your original question. (I only read this newsgroup from
time
to time.)
Neil
This is the confusion that ensues when fuckwits try to be clever. It
started with Ann Coulter trying to be clever. She isn't, David Ford
isn't and all the fuckwits developed this argument in between aren't
either.
Here's the bottom line: Ann Coulter is trying to regurgitate some well
worn Cretinist lie in her own idiom, calumnising the scientific
community by associating evolutionary science with Nazism. End of.
Oh, come now. Ann Coulter is just Pat Buchanan in drag.
Watch for a religious trek to the cemetery at Bitburg
to honor her/his "victims" anytime now.
Gray Shockley
------------------
... a government committed to a policy of
improving the nation by improving the condition
of some of the individuals will eventually run
into trouble in attempting to distinguish between
a national good and a chocolate sundae.
- E. B. White
Excellent quote by one of the really superb writers. One naturally wonders
why it's at the end of a post by some left-wing buffoon, who almost
certainly doesn't get its point. Oh well, a gem amongst the dreck is still a
gem.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Free Lunch" |
|
| Title: Re: Ann Coulter, holocaust |
20 Aug 2006 08:20:24 AM |
|
|
On Sun, 20 Aug 2006 08:58:43 -0400, in talk.origins
"Neil Harrington" <not@home.today> wrote in
<RMmdnS_37NwYwXXZnZ2dnUVZ_qqdnZ2d@comcast.com>:
"Gray Shockley" <grayshockley@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:0001HW.C10D0E4B00048FE6F0284530@news.giganews.com...
On Wed, 16 Aug 2006 14:21:24 -0500, Pastor Kutchie wrote
(in article <1155756084.007315.74130@m79g2000cwm.googlegroups.com>):
Neil Harrington wrote:
<indriko@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1155740577.096153.182630@m79g2000cwm.googlegroups.com...
david ford wrote:
indriko@yahoo.com wrote:
Question: Is it fair to say that Ann Coulter is a holocaust
revisionist?
Of course, she doesn't deny that the holocaust occurred, but she
puts the blame on "Darwinism",
Multi-Pronged Role of Darwinian Thought in Shoah's Arrival
http://www.google.com/groups?selm=dford3-1132080322.482544.299440%40g49g20
00cwa.googlegroups.com
Hitler's actions make sense given his atheism and eugenic, social
Darwinist vision
http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=dford3-1134145559.645139.229550%40f14
g2000cwb.googlegroups.com
is Darwin, or Hitler, today's most-famous Darwinist?
http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=dford3-1138681336.761356.170100%40z14
g2000cwz.googlegroups.com
[shnip]
It's nice that the thread I started has generated some interesting
responses, but I'm disappointed that I haven't seen any answers
to my original question. It wasn't just a rhetorical question. I'd
really
like to know what people think about this issue.
In light of David Ford's post, I'd like to modify my question:
Is it fair to say that Ann Coulter and David Ford are
holocaust revisionists?
Anxiously awaiting opinions,
Cleve
I don't know anything about David Ford, but how is Ann Coulter a
Holocaust
revisionist? I read her column regularly, and as far as I can see she's
a
thorough believer in the Holocaust orthodoxy. At least, I have never
seen
her write anything but negatives about "Holocaust deniers." Have I
missed
something?
I didn't see your original question. (I only read this newsgroup from
time
to time.)
Neil
This is the confusion that ensues when fuckwits try to be clever. It
started with Ann Coulter trying to be clever. She isn't, David Ford
isn't and all the fuckwits developed this argument in between aren't
either.
Here's the bottom line: Ann Coulter is trying to regurgitate some well
worn Cretinist lie in her own idiom, calumnising the scientific
community by associating evolutionary science with Nazism. End of.
Oh, come now. Ann Coulter is just Pat Buchanan in drag.
Watch for a religious trek to the cemetery at Bitburg
to honor her/his "victims" anytime now.
Gray Shockley
------------------
... a government committed to a policy of
improving the nation by improving the condition
of some of the individuals will eventually run
into trouble in attempting to distinguish between
a national good and a chocolate sundae.
- E. B. White
Excellent quote by one of the really superb writers. One naturally wonders
why it's at the end of a post by some left-wing buffoon, who almost
certainly doesn't get its point. Oh well, a gem amongst the dreck is still a
gem.
Are you intentionally blind to the fact that our current government is
committed to improving the condition of _some_ of the individuals?
If you aren't rich, Bush doesn't care what happens to you.
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Mark K. Bilbo" |
|
| Title: Re: Ann Coulter, holocaust |
20 Aug 2006 09:53:07 AM |
|
|
On Sat, 19 Aug 2006 18:51:55 -0500, Gray Shockley wrote:
On Wed, 16 Aug 2006 14:21:24 -0500, Pastor Kutchie wrote
(in article <1155756084.007315.74130@m79g2000cwm.googlegroups.com>):
Neil Harrington wrote:
<indriko@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1155740577.096153.182630@m79g2000cwm.googlegroups.com...
david ford wrote:
indriko@yahoo.com wrote:
Question: Is it fair to say that Ann Coulter is a holocaust
revisionist?
Of course, she doesn't deny that the holocaust occurred, but she
puts the blame on "Darwinism",
Multi-Pronged Role of Darwinian Thought in Shoah's Arrival
http://www.google.com/groups?selm=dford3-1132080322.482544.299440%40g49g20
00cwa.googlegroups.com
Hitler's actions make sense given his atheism and eugenic, social
Darwinist vision
http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=dford3-1134145559.645139.229550%40f14
g2000cwb.googlegroups.com
is Darwin, or Hitler, today's most-famous Darwinist?
http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=dford3-1138681336.761356.170100%40z14
g2000cwz.googlegroups.com
[shnip]
It's nice that the thread I started has generated some interesting
responses, but I'm disappointed that I haven't seen any answers
to my original question. It wasn't just a rhetorical question. I'd
really
like to know what people think about this issue.
In light of David Ford's post, I'd like to modify my question:
Is it fair to say that Ann Coulter and David Ford are
holocaust revisionists?
Anxiously awaiting opinions,
Cleve
I don't know anything about David Ford, but how is Ann Coulter a Holocaust
revisionist? I read her column regularly, and as far as I can see she's a
thorough believer in the Holocaust orthodoxy. At least, I have never seen
her write anything but negatives about "Holocaust deniers." Have I missed
something?
I didn't see your original question. (I only read this newsgroup from time
to time.)
Neil
This is the confusion that ensues when fuckwits try to be clever. It
started with Ann Coulter trying to be clever. She isn't, David Ford
isn't and all the fuckwits developed this argument in between aren't
either.
Here's the bottom line: Ann Coulter is trying to regurgitate some well
worn Cretinist lie in her own idiom, calumnising the scientific
community by associating evolutionary science with Nazism. End of.
Oh, come now. Ann Coulter is just Pat Buchanan in drag.
Watch for a religious trek to the cemetery at Bitburg
to honor her/his "victims" anytime now.
I thought Ann Coulter was Michelle Malkin (not ours, the other one) in
drag?
--
Mark K. Bilbo
--------------------------------------------------
"As hip as it is for outsiders to blame New Orleans
for everything bad that happened during and after
Hurricane Katrina, the truth is that the people
who lived here were much more prepared for a big
storm than the federal government that promised
us flood protection." [Jarvis DeBerry]
http://makeashorterlink.com/?V180525DC
"Everything New Orleans"
http://www.nola.com
.
|
|
|
| User: "Frank Mayhar" |
|
| Title: Re: Ann Coulter, holocaust |
20 Aug 2006 12:19:32 PM |
|
|
On Sun, 20 Aug 2006 10:53:07 -0500, Mark K. Bilbo wrote:
I thought Ann Coulter was Michelle Malkin (not ours, the other one) in
drag?
No, no, no. The other way around.
--
Frank Mayhar frank@exit.com http://www.exit.com/
Exit Consulting http://www.gpsclock.com/
http://www.exit.com/blog/frank/
.
|
|
|
| User: "Michelle Malkin" |
|
| Title: Re: Ann Coulter, holocaust |
20 Aug 2006 12:22:04 AM |
|
|
"Frank Mayhar" <> wrote in message
news:pan.2006.08.20.17.19.31.310381@exit.com...
On Sun, 20 Aug 2006 10:53:07 -0500, Mark K. Bilbo wrote:
I thought Ann Coulter was Michelle Malkin (not ours, the other one) in
drag?
No, no, no. The other way around.
The anti-Malkin has better taste in clothes. And, she's much
better looking than the Coultergeist. Aside from that, they're
both evil personified.
--
^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^
Michelle Malkin (Mickey) aa list#1
BAAWA Knight & Bible Thumper Thumper
^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^
--
Frank Mayhar http://www.exit.com/
Exit Consulting http://www.gpsclock.com/
http://www.exit.com/blog/frank/
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Mark K. Bilbo" |
|
| Title: Re: Ann Coulter, holocaust |
20 Aug 2006 01:14:53 PM |
|
|
On Sun, 20 Aug 2006 10:19:32 -0700, Frank Mayhar wrote:
On Sun, 20 Aug 2006 10:53:07 -0500, Mark K. Bilbo wrote:
I thought Ann Coulter was Michelle Malkin (not ours, the other one) in
drag?
No, no, no. The other way around.
Akchoally, it appears that Michelle Maglalang is Jesse Malkin in drag.
(How does a white guy get to say racially incendiary things? He makes his
Asian wife say them.)
Coulter may be David Duke in drag...
--
Mark K. Bilbo
--------------------------------------------------
"As hip as it is for outsiders to blame New Orleans
for everything bad that happened during and after
Hurricane Katrina, the truth is that the people
who lived here were much more prepared for a big
storm than the federal government that promised
us flood protection." [Jarvis DeBerry]
http://makeashorterlink.com/?V180525DC
"Everything New Orleans"
http://www.nola.com
.
|
|
|
| User: "Kate " |
|
| Title: Re: Ann Coulter, holocaust |
20 Aug 2006 02:20:08 PM |
|
|
On Sun, 20 Aug 2006 13:14:53 -0500, "Mark K. Bilbo"
<gmail@com.mkbilbo> wrote:
On Sun, 20 Aug 2006 10:19:32 -0700, Frank Mayhar wrote:
On Sun, 20 Aug 2006 10:53:07 -0500, Mark K. Bilbo wrote:
I thought Ann Coulter was Michelle Malkin (not ours, the other one) in
drag?
No, no, no. The other way around.
Akchoally, it appears that Michelle Maglalang is Jesse Malkin in drag.
(How does a white guy get to say racially incendiary things? He makes his
Asian wife say them.)
Coulter may be David Duke in drag...
now that explains a lot.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Kate " |
|
| Title: Re: Ann Coulter, holocaust |
16 Aug 2006 04:35:02 PM |
|
|
On Wed, 16 Aug 2006 12:47:21 -0400, "Neil Harrington" <not@home.today>
wrote:
<indriko@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1155740577.096153.182630@m79g2000cwm.googlegroups.com...
david ford wrote:
indriko@yahoo.com wrote:
Question: Is it fair to say that Ann Coulter is a holocaust
revisionist?
Of course, she doesn't deny that the holocaust occurred, but she
puts the blame on "Darwinism",
Multi-Pronged Role of Darwinian Thought in Shoah's Arrival
http://www.google.com/groups?selm=dford3-1132080322.482544.299440%40g49g2000cwa.googlegroups.com
Hitler's actions make sense given his atheism and eugenic, social
Darwinist vision
http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=dford3-1134145559.645139.229550%40f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com
is Darwin, or Hitler, today's most-famous Darwinist?
http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=dford3-1138681336.761356.170100%40z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com
[shnip]
It's nice that the thread I started has generated some interesting
responses, but I'm disappointed that I haven't seen any answers
to my original question. It wasn't just a rhetorical question. I'd
really
like to know what people think about this issue.
In light of David Ford's post, I'd like to modify my question:
Is it fair to say that Ann Coulter and David Ford are
holocaust revisionists?
Anxiously awaiting opinions,
Cleve
I don't know anything about David Ford, but how is Ann Coulter a Holocaust
revisionist? I read her column regularly, and as far as I can see she's a
thorough believer in the Holocaust orthodoxy. At least, I have never seen
her write anything but negatives about "Holocaust deniers." Have I missed
something?
I didn't see your original question. (I only read this newsgroup from time
to time.)
Why on earth would any intellegent person want to read anything Ann
Coulter writes? 3rd grade writing skills, with total ignorance of
facts and no desire to know them written entirely in moronic putdowns,
makes her only a favorite of the agressively stupid or stupid
aggressives.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Neil Harrington" |
|
| Title: Re: Ann Coulter, holocaust |
16 Aug 2006 05:03:25 PM |
|
|
"Kate " <cobalt@newscene.com> wrote in message
news:45088e27.844263078@news-west.newscene.com...
On Wed, 16 Aug 2006 12:47:21 -0400, "Neil Harrington" <not@home.today>
wrote:
<indriko@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1155740577.096153.182630@m79g2000cwm.googlegroups.com...
david ford wrote:
indriko@yahoo.com wrote:
Question: Is it fair to say that Ann Coulter is a holocaust
revisionist?
Of course, she doesn't deny that the holocaust occurred, but she
puts the blame on "Darwinism",
Multi-Pronged Role of Darwinian Thought in Shoah's Arrival
http://www.google.com/groups?selm=dford3-1132080322.482544.299440%40g49g2000cwa.googlegroups.com
Hitler's actions make sense given his atheism and eugenic, social
Darwinist vision
http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=dford3-1134145559.645139.229550%40f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com
is Darwin, or Hitler, today's most-famous Darwinist?
http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=dford3-1138681336.761356.170100%40z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com
[shnip]
It's nice that the thread I started has generated some interesting
responses, but I'm disappointed that I haven't seen any answers
to my original question. It wasn't just a rhetorical question. I'd
really
like to know what people think about this issue.
In light of David Ford's post, I'd like to modify my question:
Is it fair to say that Ann Coulter and David Ford are
holocaust revisionists?
Anxiously awaiting opinions,
Cleve
I don't know anything about David Ford, but how is Ann Coulter a Holocaust
revisionist? I read her column regularly, and as far as I can see she's a
thorough believer in the Holocaust orthodoxy. At least, I have never seen
her write anything but negatives about "Holocaust deniers." Have I missed
something?
I didn't see your original question. (I only read this newsgroup from time
to time.)
Why on earth would any intellegent person want to read anything Ann
Coulter writes? 3rd grade writing skills, with total ignorance of
facts and no desire to know them written entirely in moronic putdowns,
No, she's a very good writer for the kind of writing she does. She does
check her facts carefully (slips up very rarely), her books are filled with
citations and end notes for her sources, etc., and many of her put-downs are
really good zingers. If you're a left-winger, of course you will not
appreciate Ann Coulter. Those of us on the right get a kick out of her and
cheerfully buy her books, which I suppose has made her a multimillionaire
and I'm glad.
I strongly agree with Ann about 75% of the time, thoroughly disagree with
her on the remainder and just ignore it. The same goes for Michelle Malkin
(maybe 85% agreement with her). The same goes for David Horowitz;
percentages there vary according to how much of a pro-Israel toot he's on.
When he's not doing that, he's great.
Neil
.
|
|
|
| User: "Robibnikoff" |
|
| Title: Re: Ann Coulter, holocaust |
17 Aug 2006 09:17:15 AM |
|
|
"Neil Harrington" <not@home.today> wrote in message
snip
No, she's a very good writer for the kind of writing she does. She does
check her facts carefully (slips up very rarely), her books are filled
with citations and end notes for her sources, etc., and many of her
put-downs are really good zingers. If you're a left-winger, of course you
will not appreciate Ann Coulter. Those of us on the right get a kick out
of her and cheerfully buy her books, which I suppose has made her a
multimillionaire and I'm glad.
LOL - This has GOT to be satire.
--
Robyn
Resident Witchypoo
Atheist ***** Extraordinaire
#1557
.
|
|
|
| User: "Kate " |
|
| Title: Re: Ann Coulter, holocaust |
17 Aug 2006 08:27:01 PM |
|
|
On Thu, 17 Aug 2006 10:17:15 -0400, "Robibnikoff"
<witchypoo@broomstick.com> wrote:
"Neil Harrington" <not@home.today> wrote in message
snip
No, she's a very good writer for the kind of writing she does. She does
check her facts carefully (slips up very rarely), her books are filled
with citations and end notes for her sources, etc., and many of her
put-downs are really good zingers. If you're a left-winger, of course you
will not appreciate Ann Coulter. Those of us on the right get a kick out
of her and cheerfully buy her books, which I suppose has made her a
multimillionaire and I'm glad.
LOL - This has GOT to be satire.
Alas, I guess there really are people like this. Apparently they
don't speak up much on the net. Too ashamed usually no doubt.
Someone must be buying her books. Either that or she's sleeping with
the head of the publishing house, er strike that. I can't imagine
anyone capable of publishing that has that bad of taste.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Robibnikoff" |
|
| Title: Re: Ann Coulter, holocaust |
18 Aug 2006 09:41:58 AM |
|
|
"Kate " <cobalt@newscene.com> wrote in message
news:45181606.944581968@news-west.newscene.com...
On Thu, 17 Aug 2006 10:17:15 -0400, "Robibnikoff"
<witchypoo@broomstick.com> wrote:
"Neil Harrington" <not@home.today> wrote in message
snip
No, she's a very good writer for the kind of writing she does. She does
check her facts carefully (slips up very rarely), her books are filled
with citations and end notes for her sources, etc., and many of her
put-downs are really good zingers. If you're a left-winger, of course
you
will not appreciate Ann Coulter. Those of us on the right get a kick out
of her and cheerfully buy her books, which I suppose has made her a
multimillionaire and I'm glad.
LOL - This has GOT to be satire.
Alas, I guess there really are people like this. Apparently they
don't speak up much on the net. Too ashamed usually no doubt.
Someone must be buying her books. Either that or she's sleeping with
the head of the publishing house, er strike that. I can't imagine
anyone capable of publishing that has that bad of taste.
We actually have one of her books on a bookshelf where I work - It's called
"Treason". I picked it up once, read two sentences of vile spew and put it
down never to be touched again.
--
Robyn
Resident Witchypoo
Atheist ***** Extraordinaire
#1557
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Parsifal" |
|
| Title: Re: Ann Coulter, holocaust |
17 Aug 2006 06:51:16 AM |
|
|
Neil Harrington a écrit :
"Kate " <cobalt@newscene.com> wrote in message
news:45088e27.844263078@news-west.newscene.com...
On Wed, 16 Aug 2006 12:47:21 -0400, "Neil Harrington" <not@home.today>
wrote:
<indriko@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1155740577.096153.182630@m79g2000cwm.googlegroups.com...
david ford wrote:
indriko@yahoo.com wrote:
Question: Is it fair to say that Ann Coulter is a holocaust
revisionist?
Of course, she doesn't deny that the holocaust occurred, but she
puts the blame on "Darwinism",
Multi-Pronged Role of Darwinian Thought in Shoah's Arrival
http://www.google.com/groups?selm=dford3-1132080322.482544.299440%40g49g2000cwa.googlegroups.com
Hitler's actions make sense given his atheism and eugenic, social
Darwinist vision
http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=dford3-1134145559.645139.229550%40f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com
is Darwin, or Hitler, today's most-famous Darwinist?
http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=dford3-1138681336.761356.170100%40z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com
[shnip]
It's nice that the thread I started has generated some interesting
responses, but I'm disappointed that I haven't seen any answers
to my original question. It wasn't just a rhetorical question. I'd
really
like to know what people think about this issue.
In light of David Ford's post, I'd like to modify my question:
Is it fair to say that Ann Coulter and David Ford are
holocaust revisionists?
Anxiously awaiting opinions,
Cleve
I don't know anything about David Ford, but how is Ann Coulter a Holocaust
revisionist? I read her column regularly, and as far as I can see she's a
thorough believer in the Holocaust orthodoxy. At least, I have never seen
her write anything but negatives about "Holocaust deniers." Have I missed
something?
I didn't see your original question. (I only read this newsgroup from time
to time.)
Why on earth would any intellegent person want to read anything Ann
Coulter writes? 3rd grade writing skills, with total ignorance of
facts and no desire to know them written entirely in moronic putdowns,
No, she's a very good writer for the kind of writing she does. She does
check her facts carefully (slips up very rarely),
Obviously, she hadn't checked her facts when, for example, she made a
fool of herself on Canadian television:
http://www.commondreams.org/views05/0206-23.htm
Besides, someone who gets famous for lines like: "My only regret with
Timothy McVeigh is he did not go to the New York Times Building.", "We
should invade their countries, kill their leaders and convert them to
Christianity. We weren't punctilious about locating and punishing only
Hitler and his top officers. We carpet-bombed German cities; we killed
civilians. That's war. And this is war." or "Whether they are defending
the Soviet Union or bleating for Saddam Hussein, liberals are always
against America. They are either traitors or idiots, and on the matter
of America's self-preservation, the difference is irrelevant." should
either apologize or, better, commit suicide...
her books are filled with
citations and end notes for her sources, etc., and many of her put-downs are
really good zingers. If you're a left-winger, of course you will not
appreciate Ann Coulter.
No, I'd say that anyone with half a brain can see that she's nothing
more than an entertainer who takes herself a little too seriously.
Besides, her "credibility" stops at the American border. As for within
the USA, where is she published besides in arch-conservative and
pseudo-christian rags?
Those of us on the right get a kick out of her and
cheerfully buy her books, which I suppose has made her a multimillionaire
and I'm glad.
Well, since you get the politicians you deserve, I assume you also get
the "colunnists" you deserve...
I strongly agree with Ann about 75% of the time,
She's a hysterical moron 99% of the time...
thoroughly disagree with
her on the remainder and just ignore it. The same goes for Michelle Malkin
(maybe 85% agreement with her). The same goes for David Horowitz;
percentages there vary according to how much of a pro-Israel toot he's on.
When he's not doing that, he's great.
Neil
.
|
|
|
| User: "Neil Harrington" |
|
| Title: Re: Ann Coulter, holocaust |
17 Aug 2006 07:14:12 AM |
|
|
"Parsifal" <jeanpascalvachon@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1155815476.515018.179590@h48g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
Neil Harrington a écrit :
"Kate " <cobalt@newscene.com> wrote in message
news:45088e27.844263078@news-west.newscene.com...
... . .
Why on earth would any intellegent person want to read anything Ann
Coulter writes? 3rd grade writing skills, with total ignorance of
facts and no desire to know them written entirely in moronic putdowns,
No, she's a very good writer for the kind of writing she does. She does
check her facts carefully (slips up very rarely),
Obviously, she hadn't checked her facts when, for example, she made a
fool of herself on Canadian television:
http://www.commondreams.org/views05/0206-23.htm
Besides, someone who gets famous for lines like: "My only regret with
Timothy McVeigh is he did not go to the New York Times Building.",
She does have a keen sense of humor. Not everyone appreciates it, that is
true.
"We
should invade their countries, kill their leaders and convert them to
Christianity. We weren't punctilious about locating and punishing only
Hitler and his top officers. We carpet-bombed German cities; we killed
civilians. That's war. And this is war."
Note that she wrote that THE DAY AFTER Islamic terrorists had flown
airliners into the World Trade Center and the Pentagon, killing one of her
best friends, Barbara Olson, a passenger on the plane that went into the
Pentagon.
or "Whether they are defending
the Soviet Union or bleating for Saddam Hussein, liberals are always
against America. They are either traitors or idiots, and on the matter
of America's self-preservation, the difference is irrelevant."
And your complaint with that is . . . ?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Parsifal" |
|
| Title: Re: Ann Coulter, holocaust |
18 Aug 2006 03:33:51 AM |
|
|
Neil Harrington schrieb:
"Parsifal" <jeanpascalvachon@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1155815476.515018.179590@h48g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
Neil Harrington a écrit :
"Kate " <cobalt@newscene.com> wrote in message
news:45088e27.844263078@news-west.newscene.com...
.. . .
Why on earth would any intellegent person want to read anything Ann
Coulter writes? 3rd grade writing skills, with total ignorance of
facts and no desire to know them written entirely in moronic putdowns,
No, she's a very good writer for the kind of writing she does. She does
check her facts carefully (slips up very rarely),
Obviously, she hadn't checked her facts when, for example, she made a
fool of herself on Canadian television:
http://www.commondreams.org/views05/0206-23.htm
I see you didn't answer to this...
Besides, someone who gets famous for lines like: "My only regret with
Timothy McVeigh is he did not go to the New York Times Building.",
She does have a keen sense of humor. Not everyone appreciates it, that is
true.
You call this humor? When you have a certain fame and you have a
certain plat-form, you don't say things like that. People might get the
feeling that you're a hysterical moron with fascist tendencies. The
fact that you call this "humor" is quite revealing.
"We
should invade their countries, kill their leaders and convert them to
Christianity. We weren't punctilious about locating and punishing only
Hitler and his top officers. We carpet-bombed German cities; we killed
civilians. That's war. And this is war."
Note that she wrote that THE DAY AFTER Islamic terrorists had flown
airliners into the World Trade Center and the Pentagon, killing one of her
best friends, Barbara Olson, a passenger on the plane that went into the
Pentagon.
So?
or "Whether they are defending
the Soviet Union or bleating for Saddam Hussein, liberals are always
against America. They are either traitors or idiots, and on the matter
of America's self-preservation, the difference is irrelevant."
And your complaint with that is . . . ?
OK, I see... You're a moron...
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Tiktaalik" |
|
| Title: Re: Ann Coulter, holocaust |
17 Aug 2006 07:47:11 AM |
|
|
Neil Harrington wrote:
"Parsifal" <jeanpascalvachon@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1155815476.515018.179590@h48g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
Neil Harrington a écrit :
"Kate " <cobalt@newscene.com> wrote in message
news:45088e27.844263078@news-west.newscene.com...
.. . .
Why on earth would any intellegent person want to read anything Ann
Coulter writes? 3rd grade writing skills, with total ignorance of
facts and no desire to know them written entirely in moronic putdowns,
No, she's a very good writer for the kind of writing she does. She does
check her facts carefully (slips up very rarely),
Obviously, she hadn't checked her facts when, for example, she made a
fool of herself on Canadian television:
http://www.commondreams.org/views05/0206-23.htm
Besides, someone who gets famous for lines like: "My only regret with
Timothy McVeigh is he did not go to the New York Times Building.",
She does have a keen sense of humor. Not everyone appreciates it, that is
true.
She has a sick, sadistic, moronic so-called sense of humour. Wouldn't
surprise me if she tortured defenceless animals as a child. Maybe still
does.
"We
should invade their countries, kill their leaders and convert them to
Christianity. We weren't punctilious about locating and punishing only
Hitler and his top officers. We carpet-bombed German cities; we killed
civilians. That's war. And this is war."
Note that she wrote that THE DAY AFTER Islamic terrorists had flown
airliners into the World Trade Center and the Pentagon, killing one of her
best friends, Barbara Olson, a passenger on the plane that went into the
Pentagon.
So?
or "Whether they are defending
the Soviet Union or bleating for Saddam Hussein, liberals are always
against America. They are either traitors or idiots, and on the matter
of America's self-preservation, the difference is irrelevant."
And your complaint with that is . . . ?
That it is a load of fuckwitted, jingoistic bollocksology.
Cornelius. Hates right-wing media whores and their supporters.
"I am in favour of animal rights as well as human rights. That is the
way of a whole human being.". (Abraham Lincoln).
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Kate " |
|
| Title: Re: Ann Coulter, holocaust |
17 Aug 2006 10:02:01 AM |
|
|
On Thu, 17 Aug 2006 08:14:12 -0400, "Neil Harrington" <not@home.today>
wrote:
"Parsifal" <jeanpascalvachon@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1155815476.515018.179590@h48g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
Neil Harrington a écrit :
"Kate " <cobalt@newscene.com> wrote in message
news:45088e27.844263078@news-west.newscene.com...
.. . .
Why on earth would any intellegent person want to read anything Ann
Coulter writes? 3rd grade writing skills, with total ignorance of
facts and no desire to know them written entirely in moronic putdowns,
No, she's a very good writer for the kind of writing she does. She does
check her facts carefully (slips up very rarely),
Obviously, she hadn't checked her facts when, for example, she made a
fool of herself on Canadian television:
http://www.commondreams.org/views05/0206-23.htm
Besides, someone who gets famous for lines like: "My only regret with
Timothy McVeigh is he did not go to the New York Times Building.",
She does have a keen sense of humor. Not everyone appreciates it, that is
true.
"We
should invade their countries, kill their leaders and convert them to
Christianity. We weren't punctilious about locating and punishing only
Hitler and his top officers. We carpet-bombed German cities; we killed
civilians. That's war. And this is war."
Note that she wrote that THE DAY AFTER Islamic terrorists had flown
airliners into the World Trade Center and the Pentagon, killing one of her
best friends, Barbara Olson, a passenger on the plane that went into the
Pentagon.
or "Whether they are defending
the Soviet Union or bleating for Saddam Hussein, liberals are always
against America. They are either traitors or idiots, and on the matter
of America's self-preservation, the difference is irrelevant."
And your complaint with that is . . . ?
You'd have to be useless moron to think that. Intellectuals bad,
braying morons good. Exactly what Hitler used to pronounce. Such
lovely company for your opinions.
It's your reputation you are besmirching. Have at it.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Neil Harrington" |
|
| Title: Re: Ann Coulter, holocaust |
17 Aug 2006 10:38:57 AM |
|
|
"Kate " <cobalt@newscene.com> wrote in message
news:45128387.907079171@news-west.newscene.com...
On Thu, 17 Aug 2006 08:14:12 -0400, "Neil Harrington" <not@home.today>
wrote:
"Parsifal" <jeanpascalvachon@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1155815476.515018.179590@h48g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
Neil Harrington a écrit :
"Kate " <cobalt@newscene.com> wrote in message
news:45088e27.844263078@news-west.newscene.com...
.. . .
Why on earth would any intellegent person want to read anything Ann
Coulter writes? 3rd grade writing skills, with total ignorance of
facts and no desire to know them written entirely in moronic
putdowns,
No, she's a very good writer for the kind of writing she does. She does
check her facts carefully (slips up very rarely),
Obviously, she hadn't checked her facts when, for example, she made a
fool of herself on Canadian television:
http://www.commondreams.org/views05/0206-23.htm
Besides, someone who gets famous for lines like: "My only regret with
Timothy McVeigh is he did not go to the New York Times Building.",
She does have a keen sense of humor. Not everyone appreciates it, that is
true.
"We
should invade their countries, kill their leaders and convert them to
Christianity. We weren't punctilious about locating and punishing only
Hitler and his top officers. We carpet-bombed German cities; we killed
civilians. That's war. And this is war."
Note that she wrote that THE DAY AFTER Islamic terrorists had flown
airliners into the World Trade Center and the Pentagon, killing one of her
best friends, Barbara Olson, a passenger on the plane that went into the
Pentagon.
or "Whether they are defending
the Soviet Union or bleating for Saddam Hussein, liberals are always
against America. They are either traitors or idiots, and on the matter
of America's self-preservation, the difference is irrelevant."
And your complaint with that is . . . ?
You'd have to be useless moron to think that. Intellectuals bad,
"Intellectuals"?! Surely you are not confusing leftist-liberal opinion with
some sort of worthwhile cerebral process, are you?
braying morons good. Exactly what Hitler used to pronounce. Such
lovely company for your opinions.
The braying morons are all on your side, toots. As for Hitler, you could
take whole paragraphs out of Mein Kampf, attribute them to Bill or Hillary
Clinton and liberals would applaud them wildly.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Parsifal" |
|
| Title: Re: Ann Coulter, holocaust |
18 Aug 2006 03:31:28 AM |
|
|
Neil Harrington schrieb:
"Kate " <cobalt@newscene.com> wrote in message
news:45128387.907079171@news-west.newscene.com...
On Thu, 17 Aug 2006 08:14:12 -0400, "Neil Harrington" <not@home.today>
wrote:
"Parsifal" <jeanpascalvachon@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1155815476.515018.179590@h48g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
Neil Harrington a écrit :
"Kate " <cobalt@newscene.com> wrote in message
news:45088e27.844263078@news-west.newscene.com...
.. . .
Why on earth would any intellegent person want to read anything Ann
Coulter writes? 3rd grade writing skills, with total ignorance of
facts and no desire to know them written entirely in moronic
putdowns,
No, she's a very good writer for the kind of writing she does. She does
check her facts carefully (slips up very rarely),
Obviously, she hadn't checked her facts when, for example, she made a
fool of herself on Canadian television:
http://www.commondreams.org/views05/0206-23.htm
Besides, someone who gets famous for lines like: "My only regret with
Timothy McVeigh is he did not go to the New York Times Building.",
She does have a keen sense of humor. Not everyone appreciates it, that is
true.
"We
should invade their countries, kill their leaders and convert them to
Christianity. We weren't punctilious about locating and punishing only
Hitler and his top officers. We carpet-bombed German cities; we killed
civilians. That's war. And this is war."
Note that she wrote that THE DAY AFTER Islamic terrorists had flown
airliners into the World Trade Center and the Pentagon, killing one of her
best friends, Barbara Olson, a passenger on the plane that went into the
Pentagon.
or "Whether they are defending
the Soviet Union or bleating for Saddam Hussein, liberals are always
against America. They are either traitors or idiots, and on the matter
of America's self-preservation, the difference is irrelevant."
And your complaint with that is . . . ?
You'd have to be useless moron to think that. Intellectuals bad,
"Intellectuals"?! Surely you are not confusing leftist-liberal opinion with
some sort of worthwhile cerebral process, are you?
OK, you've shown your true colours... Why can't NO right-winger discuss
intelligently?
braying morons good. Exactly what Hitler used to pronounce. Such
lovely company for your opinions.
The braying morons are all on your side, toots. As for Hitler, you could
take whole paragraphs out of Mein Kampf, attribute them to Bill or Hillary
Clinton and liberals would applaud them wildly.
Sure... Go with your fellow goose-stepping pseudo christians applaud
the latest deed of your Great Leader... He's doing so well, isn't he?
Obviously, you're a moron... No surprise you enjoy Ann Coulter's
columns...
.
|
|
|
| User: "Neil Harrington" |
|
| Title: Re: Ann Coulter, holocaust |
18 Aug 2006 10:53:11 AM |
|
|
"Parsifal" <jeanpascalvachon@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1155889888.536880.265080@m73g2000cwd.googlegroups.com...
Neil Harrington schrieb:
"Kate " <cobalt@newscene.com> wrote in message
news:45128387.907079171@news-west.newscene.com...
On Thu, 17 Aug 2006 08:14:12 -0400, "Neil Harrington" <not@home.today>
wrote:
"Parsifal" <jeanpascalvachon@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1155815476.515018.179590@h48g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
Neil Harrington a écrit :
"Kate " <cobalt@newscene.com> wrote in message
news:45088e27.844263078@news-west.newscene.com...
.. . .
Why on earth would any intellegent person want to read anything
Ann
Coulter writes? 3rd grade writing skills, with total ignorance
of
facts and no desire to know them written entirely in moronic
putdowns,
No, she's a very good writer for the kind of writing she does. She
does
check her facts carefully (slips up very rarely),
Obviously, she hadn't checked her facts when, for example, she made a
fool of herself on Canadian television:
http://www.commondreams.org/views05/0206-23.htm
Besides, someone who gets famous for lines like: "My only regret with
Timothy McVeigh is he did not go to the New York Times Building.",
She does have a keen sense of humor. Not everyone appreciates it, that
is
true.
"We
should invade their countries, kill their leaders and convert them to
Christianity. We weren't punctilious about locating and punishing
only
Hitler and his top officers. We carpet-bombed German cities; we
killed
civilians. That's war. And this is war."
Note that she wrote that THE DAY AFTER Islamic terrorists had flown
airliners into the World Trade Center and the Pentagon, killing one of
her
best friends, Barbara Olson, a passenger on the plane that went into
the
Pentagon.
or "Whether they are defending
the Soviet Union or bleating for Saddam Hussein, liberals are always
against America. They are either traitors or idiots, and on the
matter
of America's self-preservation, the difference is irrelevant."
And your complaint with that is . . . ?
You'd have to be useless moron to think that. Intellectuals bad,
"Intellectuals"?! Surely you are not confusing leftist-liberal opinion
with
some sort of worthwhile cerebral process, are you?
OK, you've shown your true colours... Why can't NO right-winger discuss
intelligently?
Well, you did get the spelling right, which is something of an achievement
for you I suppose. Now you just have to work on those double negatives.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Parsifal" |
|
| Title: Re: Ann Coulter, holocaust |
18 Aug 2006 03:01:59 PM |
|
|
Neil Harrington schrieb:
"Parsifal" <jeanpascalvachon@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1155889888.536880.265080@m73g2000cwd.googlegroups.com...
Neil Harrington schrieb:
"Kate " <cobalt@newscene.com> wrote in message
news:45128387.907079171@news-west.newscene.com...
On Thu, 17 Aug 2006 08:14:12 -0400, "Neil Harrington" <not@home.today>
wrote:
"Parsifal" <jeanpascalvachon@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1155815476.515018.179590@h48g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
Neil Harrington a écrit :
"Kate " <cobalt@newscene.com> wrote in message
news:45088e27.844263078@news-west.newscene.com...
.. . .
Why on earth would any intellegent person want to read anything
Ann
Coulter writes? 3rd grade writing skills, with total ignorance
of
facts and no desire to know them written entirely in moronic
putdowns,
No, she's a very good writer for the kind of writing she does. She
does
check her facts carefully (slips up very rarely),
Obviously, she hadn't checked her facts when, for example, she made a
fool of herself on Canadian television:
http://www.commondreams.org/views05/0206-23.htm
Besides, someone who gets famous for lines like: "My only regret with
Timothy McVeigh is he did not go to the New York Times Building.",
She does have a keen sense of humor. Not everyone appreciates it, that
is
true.
"We
should invade their countries, kill their leaders and convert them to
Christianity. We weren't punctilious about locating and punishing
only
Hitler and his top officers. We carpet-bombed German cities; we
killed
civilians. That's war. And this is war."
Note that she wrote that THE DAY AFTER Islamic terrorists had flown
airliners into the World Trade Center and the Pentagon, killing one of
her
best friends, Barbara Olson, a passenger on the plane that went into
the
Pentagon.
or "Whether they are defending
the Soviet Union or bleating for Saddam Hussein, liberals are always
against America. They are either traitors or idiots, and on the
matter
of America's self-preservation, the difference is irrelevant."
And your complaint with that is . . . ?
You'd have to be useless moron to think that. Intellectuals bad,
"Intellectuals"?! Surely you are not confusing leftist-liberal opinion
with
some sort of worthwhile cerebral process, are you?
OK, you've shown your true colours... Why can't NO right-winger discuss
intelligently?
Well, you did get the spelling right, which is something of an achievement
for you I suppose. Now you just have to work on those double negatives.
Anytime you want to have a discussion in your third language, I'm
ready... Oh, i forgot: you're an American, you don't even know there
are other languages than English...
Pauvre imbécile, armer Trottel...
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Parsifal" |
|
| Title: Re: Ann Coulter, holocaust |
18 Aug 2006 03:05:28 PM |
|
|
Neil Harrington schrieb:
"Parsifal" <jeanpascalvachon@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1155889888.536880.265080@m73g2000cwd.googlegroups.com...
Neil Harrington schrieb:
"Kate " <cobalt@newscene.com> wrote in message
news:45128387.907079171@news-west.newscene.com...
On Thu, 17 Aug 2006 08:14:12 -0400, "Neil Harrington" <not@home.today>
wrote:
"Parsifal" <jeanpascalvachon@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1155815476.515018.179590@h48g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
Neil Harrington a écrit :
"Kate " <cobalt@newscene.com> wrote in message
news:45088e27.844263078@news-west.newscene.com...
.. . .
Why on earth would any intellegent person want to read anything
Ann
Coulter writes? 3rd grade writing skills, with total ignorance
of
facts and no desire to know them written entirely in moronic
putdowns,
No, she's a very good writer for the kind of writing she does. She
does
check her facts carefully (slips up very rarely),
Obviously, she hadn't checked her facts when, for example, she made a
fool of herself on Canadian television:
http://www.commondreams.org/views05/0206-23.htm
Besides, someone who gets famous for lines like: "My only regret with
Timothy McVeigh is he did not go to the New York Times Building.",
She does have a keen sense of humor. Not everyone appreciates it, that
is
true.
"We
should invade their countries, kill their leaders and convert them to
Christianity. We weren't punctilious about locating and punishing
only
Hitler and his top officers. We carpet-bombed German cities; we
killed
civilians. That's war. And this is war."
Note that she wrote that THE DAY AFTER Islamic terrorists had flown
airliners into the World Trade Center and the Pentagon, killing one of
her
best friends, Barbara Olson, a passenger on the plane that went into
the
Pentagon.
or "Whether they are defending
the Soviet Union or bleating for Saddam Hussein, liberals are always
against America. They are either traitors or idiots, and on the
matter
of America's self-preservation, the difference is irrelevant."
And your complaint with that is . . . ?
You'd have to be useless moron to think that. Intellectuals bad,
"Intellectuals"?! Surely you are not confusing leftist-liberal opinion
with
some sort of worthwhile cerebral process, are you?
OK, you've shown your true colours... Why can't NO right-winger discuss
intelligently?
Well, you did get the spelling right, which is something of an achievement
for you I suppose. Now you just have to work on those double negatives.
Besides, thank you for admitting I'm right since the only thing that
seems to bother you is my spelling...
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Gray Shockley" |
|
| Title: Re: Ann Coulter, holocaust (oopsie-forgot cite) |
20 Aug 2006 12:51:32 PM |
|
|
On Fri, 18 Aug 2006 10:53:11 -0500, Neil Harrington wrote
(in article <w9SdnQnZ6abyf3jZnZ2dnUVZ_o6dnZ2d@comcast.com>):
"Parsifal" <jeanpascalvachon@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1155889888.536880.265080@m73g2000cwd.googlegroups.com...
Neil Harrington schrieb:
"Kate " <cobalt@newscene.com> wrote in message
news:45128387.907079171@news-west.newscene.com...
On Thu, 17 Aug 2006 08:14:12 -0400, "Neil Harrington" <not@home.today>
wrote:
"Parsifal" <jeanpascalvachon@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1155815476.515018.179590@h48g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
Neil Harrington a écrit :
"Kate " <cobalt@newscene.com> wrote in message
news:45088e27.844263078@news-west.newscene.com...
.. . .
Why on earth would any intellegent person want to read anything
Ann
Coulter writes? 3rd grade writing skills, with total ignorance
of
facts and no desire to know them written entirely in moronic
putdowns,
No, she's a very good writer for the kind of writing she does. She
does
check her facts carefully (slips up very rarely),
Obviously, she hadn't checked her facts when, for example, she made a
fool of herself on Canadian television:
http://www.commondreams.org/views05/0206-23.htm
Besides, someone who gets famous for lines like: "My only regret with
Timothy McVeigh is he did not go to the New York Times Building.",
She does have a keen sense of humor. Not everyone appreciates it, that
is
true.
"We
should invade their countries, kill their leaders and convert them to
Christianity. We weren't punctilious about locating and punishing
only
Hitler and his top officers. We carpet-bombed German cities; we
killed
civilians. That's war. And this is war."
Note that she wrote that THE DAY AFTER Islamic terrorists had flown
airliners into the World Trade Center and the Pentagon, killing one of
her
best friends, Barbara Olson, a passenger on the plane that went into
the
Pentagon.
or "Whether they are defending
the Soviet Union or bleating for Saddam Hussein, liberals are always
against America. They are either traitors or idiots, and on the
matter
of America's self-preservation, the difference is irrelevant."
And your complaint with that is . . . ?
You'd have to be useless moron to think that. Intellectuals bad,
"Intellectuals"?! Surely you are not confusing leftist-liberal opinion
with
some sort of worthwhile cerebral process, are you?
OK, you've shown your true colours... Why can't NO right-winger discuss
intelligently?
Well, you did get the spelling right, which is something of an achievement
for you I suppose. Now you just have to work on those double negatives.
As long as the Republicans keep nominating them and as long as you keep
fooling "... some of the people all the time ..." (and with the astonishing
Katherine Harris counting the votes), we will be faced with what may well be
the entire government in danger, not from one rotten apple but because the
tree has hoof-and-mouth disease. {Oh? You haven't heard?}
---------------------------------------------------------
QUOTE:
But when America is fighting a global war on terror where the battle is for
hearts and minds instead of beachheads and landing strips, we need a leader
who can explain to friend and foe alike why America is in Iraq, why we keep
sending arms to Israel and why liberal democracy really is preferable to
Islamic fascism.
Right now, George W. Bush is not that leader.
<http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/13345463/#060816a>
---------------------------------------------------------
Gray Shockley
-------------------------------------------
For every complex problem there is an answer
that is clear, simple, and wrong. - H. L. Mencken
This is what I didn't add in my previous message:
< http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/13345463/#060816a>
Gray Shockley
------------------------------
In President Bush's vision
of the Apocalypse, there
are four Shetland ponies.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Gray Shockley" |
|
| Title: Re: Ann Coulter, holocaust |
20 Aug 2006 12:49:10 PM |
|
|
On Fri, 18 Aug 2006 10:53:11 -0500, Neil Harrington wrote
(in article <w9SdnQnZ6abyf3jZnZ2dnUVZ_o6dnZ2d@comcast.com>):
"Parsifal" <jeanpascalvachon@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1155889888.536880.265080@m73g2000cwd.googlegroups.com...
Neil Harrington schrieb:
"Kate " <cobalt@newscene.com> wrote in message
news:45128387.907079171@news-west.newscene.com...
On Thu, 17 Aug 2006 08:14:12 -0400, "Neil Harrington" <not@home.today>
wrote:
"Parsifal" <jeanpascalvachon@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1155815476.515018.179590@h48g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
Neil Harrington a écrit :
"Kate " <cobalt@newscene.com> wrote in message
news:45088e27.844263078@news-west.newscene.com...
.. . .
Why on earth would any intellegent person want to read anything
Ann
Coulter writes? 3rd grade writing skills, with total ignorance
of
facts and no desire to know them written entirely in moronic
putdowns,
No, she's a very good writer for the kind of writing she does. She
does
check her facts carefully (slips up very rarely),
Obviously, she hadn't checked her facts when, for example, she made a
fool of herself on Canadian television:
http://www.commondreams.org/views05/0206-23.htm
Besides, someone who gets famous for lines like: "My only regret with
Timothy McVeigh is he did not go to the New York Times Building.",
She does have a keen sense of humor. Not everyone appreciates it, that
is
true.
"We
should invade their countries, kill their leaders and convert them to
Christianity. We weren't punctilious about locating and punishing
only
Hitler and his top officers. We carpet-bombed German cities; we
killed
civilians. That's war. And this is war."
Note that she wrote that THE DAY AFTER Islamic terrorists had flown
airliners into the World Trade Center and the Pentagon, killing one of
her
best friends, Barbara Olson, a passenger on the plane that went into
the
Pentagon.
or "Whether they are defending
the Soviet Union or bleating for Saddam Hussein, liberals are always
against America. They are either traitors or idiots, and on the
matter
of America's self-preservation, the difference is irrelevant."
And your complaint with that is . . . ?
You'd have to be useless moron to think that. Intellectuals bad,
"Intellectuals"?! Surely you are not confusing leftist-liberal opinion
with
some sort of worthwhile cerebral process, are you?
OK, you've shown your true colours... Why can't NO right-winger discuss
intelligently?
Well, you did get the spelling right, which is something of an achievement
for you I suppose. Now you just have to work on those double negatives.
As long as the Republicans keep nominating them and as long as you keep
fooling "... some of the people all the time ..." (and with the astonishing
Katherine Harris counting the votes), we will be faced with what may well be
the entire government in danger, not from one rotten apple but because the
tree has hoof-and-mouth disease. {Oh? You haven't heard?}
---------------------------------------------------------
QUOTE:
But when America is fighting a global war on terror where the battle is for
hearts and minds instead of beachheads and landing strips, we need a leader
who can explain to friend and foe alike why America is in Iraq, why we keep
sending arms to Israel and why liberal democracy really is preferable to
Islamic fascism.
Right now, George W. Bush is not that leader.
<>
---------------------------------------------------------
Gray Shockley
-------------------------------------------
For every complex problem there is an answer
that is clear, simple, and wrong. - H. L. Mencken
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Kate " |
|
| Title: Re: Ann Coulter, holocaust |
18 Aug 2006 09:01:02 AM |
|
|
On Thu, 17 Aug 2006 11:38:57 -0400, "Neil Harrington" <not@home.today>
wrote:
"Kate " <cobalt@newscene.com> wrote in message
news:45128387.907079171@news-west.newscene.com...
On Thu, 17 Aug 2006 08:14:12 -0400, "Neil Harrington" <not@home.today>
wrote:
"Parsifal" <jeanpascalvachon@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1155815476.515018.179590@h48g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
Neil Harrington a écrit :
"Kate " <cobalt@newscene.com> wrote in message
news:45088e27.844263078@news-west.newscene.com...
.. . .
Why on earth would any intellegent person want to read anything Ann
Coulter writes? 3rd grade writing skills, with total ignorance of
facts and no desire to know them written entirely in moronic
putdowns,
No, she's a very good writer for the kind of writing she does. She does
check her facts carefully (slips up very rarely),
Obviously, she hadn't checked her facts when, for example, she made a
fool of herself on Canadian television:
http://www.commondreams.org/views05/0206-23.htm
Besides, someone who gets famous for lines like: "My only regret with
Timothy McVeigh is he did not go to the New York Times Building.",
She does have a keen sense of humor. Not everyone appreciates it, that is
true.
"We
should invade their countries, kill their leaders and convert them to
Christianity. We weren't punctilious about locating and punishing only
Hitler and his top officers. We carpet-bombed German cities; we killed
civilians. That's war. And this is war."
Note that she wrote that THE DAY AFTER Islamic terrorists had flown
airliners into the World Trade Center and the Pentagon, killing one of her
best friends, Barbara Olson, a passenger on the plane that went into the
Pentagon.
or "Whether they are defending
the Soviet Union or bleating for Saddam Hussein, liberals are always
against America. They are either traitors or idiots, and on the matter
of America's self-preservation, the difference is irrelevant."
And your complaint with that is . . . ?
You'd have to be useless moron to think that. Intellectuals bad,
"Intellectuals"?! Surely you are not confusing leftist-liberal opinion with
some sort of worthwhile cerebral process, are you?
Yup - intellectuals. Damn good ones too.
We created this country, we created science and medicine. We
developed the computer you are sitting at and established the internet
you are talking on. You'd be sitting at a fire impotently shaking
your fists if it weren't for us.
LOL
And conservatives spent history doing what? Insisting the world is
flat? Burning witches? Invading Iraq looking for imaginary WMDs?
It's all so impressive (not)
braying morons good. Exactly what Hitler used to pronounce. Such
lovely company for your opinions.
The braying morons are all on your side, toots. As for Hitler, you could
take whole paragraphs out of Mein Kampf, attribute them to Bill or Hillary
Clinton and liberals would applaud them wildly.
Except you can't. If you'd done any of your homework, you'd know that
Hitler spent all his time putting down liberals because we were the
dangerous ones standing up to him.
And we are still standing up to you and morons like Ann.
Enough now. We'v | | | | | | | | | |
