| Topic: |
Religions > Atheism |
| User: |
"_ G O D _" |
| Date: |
20 Oct 2005 02:49:18 AM |
| Object: |
Re: Another cop dies "in the line of duty" |
"DCI" <never@comcast.net> wrote
news:lgrcl1lb6laqnp2p75mukc9h44s0df1iba@4ax.com...
I can take it from your words that
your happy a cop died on duty.
When/where did I say that the pig "died on duty?"
--
---
_____________________________________________________
I intend to last long enough to put out of business all *****-suckers
together with institutions of the industrialized slavery and genocide.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"The army that will defeat terrorism doesn't wear uniforms, or drive
Humvies, or calls in air-strikes. It doesn't have a high command, or
high security, or a high budget. The army that can defeat terrorism
does battle quietly, clearing minefields and vaccinating children. It
undermines military dictatorships and military lobbyists. It subverts
sweatshops and special interests.Where people feel powerless, it
helps them organize for change, and where people are powerful, it
reminds them of their responsibility." ~~~~ Author Unknown ~~~~
___________________________________________________
--
.
|
|
| User: "jaybird" |
|
| Title: Re: Another cop dies "in the line of duty" |
20 Oct 2005 10:25:51 AM |
|
|
"_ G O D _" <demigod1@sprint.ca> wrote in message
news:m_H5f.263$713.836@newscontent-01.sprint.ca...
"DCI" <never@comcast.net> wrote
news:lgrcl1lb6laqnp2p75mukc9h44s0df1iba@4ax.com...
I can take it from your words that
your happy a cop died on duty.
When/where did I say that the pig "died on duty?"
And when did we start talking about livestock?
--
---
jaybird
---
I am not the cause of your problems.
My actions are the result of your actions.
Your life is not my fault.
.
|
|
|
| User: "DCI" |
|
| Title: Re: Another cop dies "in the line of duty" |
20 Oct 2005 11:57:14 AM |
|
|
On Thu, 20 Oct 2005 15:25:51 GMT, "jaybird" <nospam@me.com> wrote:
"_ G O D _" <demigod1@sprint.ca> wrote in message
news:m_H5f.263$713.836@newscontent-01.sprint.ca...
"DCI" <never@comcast.net> wrote
news:lgrcl1lb6laqnp2p75mukc9h44s0df1iba@4ax.com...
I can take it from your words that
your happy a cop died on duty.
When/where did I say that the pig "died on duty?"
And when did we start talking about livestock?
He starts talking about livestock when he shows his family portrait.
DCI
.
|
|
|
| User: "_ G O D _" |
|
| Title: Re: Another cop dies "in the line of duty" |
20 Oct 2005 01:20:58 PM |
|
|
"DCI" <never@comcast.net> wrote
news:i1jfl1hsk7bbvu5097coalltbkbl15s6l5@4ax.com...
"jaybird" <nospam@me.com> wrote:
"_ G O D _" <demigod1@sprint.ca> wrote
news:m_H5f.263$713.836@newscontent-01.sprint.ca...
"DCI" <never@comcast.net> wrote
news:lgrcl1lb6laqnp2p75mukc9h44s0df1iba@4ax.com...
I can take it from your words that
your happy a cop died on duty.
When/where did I say that the pig "died on duty?"
And when did we start talking about livestock?
He starts talking about livestock when he shows his family portrait.
Hey-hey-hey, WOW...!
Don't get so distracted by my family portraits, and
try to get to the subject of the matter by answering
to the warranted and earnest questions...
BTW, I like pigs, and I hate it so much when they
die by violent deaths regardless of whether it is
happening during their work, or at leisure hours...
I care about pigs lives and safety just as much as
I care about all other people who've consciously
elected to work in the fields of a very dangerous
and health-hazardous occupations. Because it
tells alot about their self-denial and courage in
the benefits of entire society. It is just that pigs
have to deal with human corruption more than any
other occupation, which rubs off on them easier
than on other people. It is my personal opinion,
that they are not only more vulnerable to it, but
also very predisposed to be corrupted than any
other trades. Because it takes a very strong and
conscientious person of a very high intelligence
to resist the temptations of offering sympathy to
violators, as well as self-serving instincts. But to
withstand the powerful effects of very corrosive
environment, where they have been submerged
on constant basis - takes virtually a supermen...
But knowing pigs on the personal basis - in the
capacity of friends and family, I am quite aware
of the fact that they are just humans - and like all
the other people, - with their personal vices and
weaknesses. Therefore, I'm standing in support
of elimination of such occupation, followed by a
compulsory service on basis of social obligation
of every competent member of community to give
one's time and effort in service of maintain law
and order in their local community - at least at the
places of their residence...
--
_____________________________________________________
I intend to last long enough to put out of business all *****-suckers
and other beneficiaries of the institutionalized slavery and genocide.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"The army that will defeat terrorism doesn't wear uniforms, or drive
Humvees, or calls in air-strikes. It doesn't have a high command, or
high security, or a high budget. The army that can defeat terrorism
does battle quietly, clearing minefields and vaccinating children. It
undermines military dictatorships and military lobbyists. It subverts
sweatshops and special interests.Where people feel powerless, it
helps them organize for change, and where people are powerful, it
reminds them of their responsibility." ~~~~ Author Unknown ~~~~
___________________________________________________
--
.
|
|
|
| User: "jaybird" |
|
| Title: Re: Another cop dies "in the line of duty" |
20 Oct 2005 02:22:39 PM |
|
|
"_ G O D _" <demigod1@sprint.ca> wrote in message
news:AeR5f.360$713.881@newscontent-01.sprint.ca...
"DCI" <never@comcast.net> wrote
news:i1jfl1hsk7bbvu5097coalltbkbl15s6l5@4ax.com...
"jaybird" <nospam@me.com> wrote:
"_ G O D _" <demigod1@sprint.ca> wrote
news:m_H5f.263$713.836@newscontent-01.sprint.ca...
"DCI" <never@comcast.net> wrote
news:lgrcl1lb6laqnp2p75mukc9h44s0df1iba@4ax.com...
I can take it from your words that
your happy a cop died on duty.
When/where did I say that the pig "died on duty?"
And when did we start talking about livestock?
He starts talking about livestock when he shows his family portrait.
Hey-hey-hey, WOW...!
Don't get so distracted by my family portraits, and
try to get to the subject of the matter by answering
to the warranted and earnest questions...
BTW, I like pigs, and I hate it so much when they
die by violent deaths regardless of whether it is
happening during their work, or at leisure hours...
I care about pigs lives and safety just as much as
I care about all other people who've consciously
elected to work in the fields of a very dangerous
and health-hazardous occupations. Because it
tells alot about their self-denial and courage in
the benefits of entire society. It is just that pigs
have to deal with human corruption more than any
other occupation, which rubs off on them easier
than on other people. It is my personal opinion,
that they are not only more vulnerable to it, but
also very predisposed to be corrupted than any
other trades. Because it takes a very strong and
conscientious person of a very high intelligence
to resist the temptations of offering sympathy to
violators, as well as self-serving instincts. But to
withstand the powerful effects of very corrosive
environment, where they have been submerged
on constant basis - takes virtually a supermen...
But knowing pigs on the personal basis - in the
capacity of friends and family, I am quite aware
of the fact that they are just humans - and like all
the other people, - with their personal vices and
weaknesses. Therefore, I'm standing in support
of elimination of such occupation, followed by a
compulsory service on basis of social obligation
of every competent member of community to give
one's time and effort in service of maintain law
and order in their local community - at least at the
places of their residence...
We're just still wondering what livestock have to do with this thread.
--
---
jaybird
---
I am not the cause of your problems.
My actions are the result of your actions.
Your life is not my fault.
.
|
|
|
| User: "_ G O D _" |
|
| Title: Re: Another cop dies "in the line of duty" |
20 Oct 2005 04:11:26 PM |
|
|
"jaybird" <nospam@me.com> wrote
news:38S5f.4123$GQ.2064@tornado.texas.rr.com...
"_ G O D _" wrote news:AeR5f.360$713.881@newscontent-01.sprint.ca...
"DCI" <never@comcast.net> wrote
news:i1jfl1hsk7bbvu5097coalltbkbl15s6l5@4ax.com...
"jaybird" <nospam@me.com> wrote:
"_ G O D _" wrote
news:m_H5f.263$713.836@newscontent-01.sprint.ca...
"DCI" <never@comcast.net> wrote
news:lgrcl1lb6laqnp2p75mukc9h44s0df1iba@4ax.com...
I can take it from your words that
your happy a cop died on duty.
When/where did I say that the pig "died on duty?"
And when did we start talking about livestock?
He starts talking about livestock when he shows his family portrait.
Hey-hey-hey, WOW...!
Don't get so distracted by my family portraits, and
try to get to the subject of the matter by answering
to the warranted and earnest questions...
BTW, I like pigs, and I hate it so much when they
die by violent deaths regardless of whether it is
happening during their work, or at leisure hours...
I care about pigs lives and safety just as much as
I care about all other people who've consciously
elected to work in the fields of a very dangerous
and health-hazardous occupations. Because it
tells alot about their self-denial and courage in
the benefits of entire society. It is just that pigs
have to deal with human corruption more than any
other occupation, which rubs off on them easier
than on other people. It is my personal opinion,
that they are not only more vulnerable to it, but
also very predisposed to be corrupted than any
other trades. Because it takes a very strong and
conscientious person of a very high intelligence
to resist the temptations of offering sympathy to
violators, as well as self-serving instincts. But to
withstand the powerful effects of very corrosive
environment, where they have been submerged
on constant basis - takes virtually a supermen...
But knowing pigs on the personal basis - in the
capacity of friends and family, I am quite aware
of the fact that they are just humans - and like all
the other people, - with their personal vices and
weaknesses. Therefore, I'm standing in support
of elimination of such occupation, followed by a
compulsory service on basis of social obligation
of every competent member of community to give
one's time and effort in service of maintain law
and order in their local community - at least at the
places of their residence...
We're just still wondering what livestock have to do with this thread.
Don't you mean to say about yourself as a singular?
Because other than you I don't see anybody else
playing retard on me. You should know that no one
would join to be insulted by your words in the capacity
of retard who cannot help himself but to be insulting...
You should go back to the origins of word pig, if you
still think that the pigs can only represent a livestock...
--
_____________________________________________________
I intend to last long enough to put out of business all *****-suckers
and other beneficiaries of the institutionalized slavery and genocide.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"The army that will defeat terrorism doesn't wear uniforms, or drive
Humvees, or calls in air-strikes. It doesn't have a high command, or
high security, or a high budget. The army that can defeat terrorism
does battle quietly, clearing minefields and vaccinating children. It
undermines military dictatorships and military lobbyists. It subverts
sweatshops and special interests.Where people feel powerless, it
helps them organize for change, and where people are powerful, it
reminds them of their responsibility." ~~~~ Author Unknown ~~~~
___________________________________________________
--
.
|
|
|
| User: "jaybird" |
|
| Title: Re: Another cop dies "in the line of duty" |
20 Oct 2005 04:52:35 PM |
|
|
"_ G O D _" <demigod1@sprint.ca> wrote in message
news:oKT5f.382$713.1054@newscontent-01.sprint.ca...
"jaybird" <nospam@me.com> wrote
news:38S5f.4123$GQ.2064@tornado.texas.rr.com...
"_ G O D _" wrote news:AeR5f.360$713.881@newscontent-01.sprint.ca...
"DCI" <never@comcast.net> wrote
news:i1jfl1hsk7bbvu5097coalltbkbl15s6l5@4ax.com...
"jaybird" <nospam@me.com> wrote:
"_ G O D _" wrote
news:m_H5f.263$713.836@newscontent-01.sprint.ca...
"DCI" <never@comcast.net> wrote
news:lgrcl1lb6laqnp2p75mukc9h44s0df1iba@4ax.com...
I can take it from your words that
your happy a cop died on duty.
When/where did I say that the pig "died on duty?"
And when did we start talking about livestock?
He starts talking about livestock when he shows his family portrait.
Hey-hey-hey, WOW...!
Don't get so distracted by my family portraits, and
try to get to the subject of the matter by answering
to the warranted and earnest questions...
BTW, I like pigs, and I hate it so much when they
die by violent deaths regardless of whether it is
happening during their work, or at leisure hours...
I care about pigs lives and safety just as much as
I care about all other people who've consciously
elected to work in the fields of a very dangerous
and health-hazardous occupations. Because it
tells alot about their self-denial and courage in
the benefits of entire society. It is just that pigs
have to deal with human corruption more than any
other occupation, which rubs off on them easier
than on other people. It is my personal opinion,
that they are not only more vulnerable to it, but
also very predisposed to be corrupted than any
other trades. Because it takes a very strong and
conscientious person of a very high intelligence
to resist the temptations of offering sympathy to
violators, as well as self-serving instincts. But to
withstand the powerful effects of very corrosive
environment, where they have been submerged
on constant basis - takes virtually a supermen...
But knowing pigs on the personal basis - in the
capacity of friends and family, I am quite aware
of the fact that they are just humans - and like all
the other people, - with their personal vices and
weaknesses. Therefore, I'm standing in support
of elimination of such occupation, followed by a
compulsory service on basis of social obligation
of every competent member of community to give
one's time and effort in service of maintain law
and order in their local community - at least at the
places of their residence...
We're just still wondering what livestock have to do with this thread.
Don't you mean to say about yourself as a singular?
Because other than you I don't see anybody else
playing retard on me. You should know that no one
would join to be insulted by your words in the capacity
of retard who cannot help himself but to be insulting...
You should go back to the origins of word pig, if you
still think that the pigs can only represent a livestock...
So do you use the term "*****" to describe African Americans? I take it
that you like to use condescending terms for those you do not like.
--
---
jaybird
---
I am not the cause of your problems.
My actions are the result of your actions.
Your life is not my fault.
.
|
|
|
| User: "_ G O D _" |
|
| Title: Re: Another cop dies "in the line of duty" |
21 Oct 2005 12:39:31 AM |
|
|
"jaybird" <nospam@me.com> wrote
news:DkU5f.4138$GQ.3775@tornado.texas.rr.com...
"_ G O D _" <demigod1@sprint.ca> wrote
news:oKT5f.382$713.1054@newscontent-01.sprint.ca...
You should go back to the origins of word pig, if you
still think that the pigs can only represent a livestock...
So do you use the term "*****" to describe African Americans? I take it that you
like to use condescending terms for those you do not like.
Choice of words used to convey one's thoughts
does not have to be (mis)interpreted in terms of
liking or disliking, for that matter, jaybird. Do you
really think that I'd be holding back my feelings
of animosity toward pigs, if I indeed, have them?
But even the term "*****" is considerably more
politically correct to describe a black person than
"African American," because true meaning of the
word "*****" means "black person," who may not
be (or think of oneself as) "African" or "American"...
Because in Europe, for example, black people are
usually neither Africans nor Americans. As a rule,
they are carrying nationalities of the countries of
residence or birth, depending on documentation...
--
_____________________________________________________
I intend to last long enough to put out of business all *****-suckers
and other beneficiaries of the institutionalized slavery and genocide.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"The army that will defeat terrorism doesn't wear uniforms, or drive
Humvees, or calls in air-strikes. It doesn't have a high command, or
high security, or a high budget. The army that can defeat terrorism
does battle quietly, clearing minefields and vaccinating children. It
undermines military dictatorships and military lobbyists. It subverts
sweatshops and special interests.Where people feel powerless, it
helps them organize for change, and where people are powerful, it
reminds them of their responsibility." ~~~~ Author Unknown ~~~~
___________________________________________________
--
.
|
|
|
| User: "jaybird" |
|
| Title: Re: Another cop dies "in the line of duty" |
21 Oct 2005 10:56:43 AM |
|
|
"_ G O D _" <demigod1@sprint.ca> wrote in message
news:Ja%5f.447$713.1241@newscontent-01.sprint.ca...
"jaybird" <nospam@me.com> wrote
news:DkU5f.4138$GQ.3775@tornado.texas.rr.com...
"_ G O D _" <demigod1@sprint.ca> wrote
news:oKT5f.382$713.1054@newscontent-01.sprint.ca...
You should go back to the origins of word pig, if you
still think that the pigs can only represent a livestock...
So do you use the term "*****" to describe African Americans? I take it
that you like to use condescending terms for those you do not like.
Choice of words used to convey one's thoughts
does not have to be (mis)interpreted in terms of
liking or disliking, for that matter, jaybird. Do you
really think that I'd be holding back my feelings
of animosity toward pigs, if I indeed, have them?
But even the term "*****" is considerably more
politically correct to describe a black person than
"African American," because true meaning of the
word "*****" means "black person," who may not
be (or think of oneself as) "African" or "American"...
Because in Europe, for example, black people are
usually neither Africans nor Americans. As a rule,
they are carrying nationalities of the countries of
residence or birth, depending on documentation...
I'm just flattered that you care enough about my profession to take time out
of your day to post about it so often.
--
---
jaybird
---
I am not the cause of your problems.
My actions are the result of your actions.
Your life is not my fault.
.
|
|
|
| User: "_ G O D _" |
|
| Title: Re: Another cop dies "in the line of duty" |
21 Oct 2005 12:30:23 PM |
|
|
"jaybird" <nospam@me.com> wrote
news:%c86f.8321$5e4.2305@tornado.texas.rr.com...
"_ G O D _" <demigod1@sprint.ca> wrote
news:Ja%5f.447$713.1241@newscontent-01.sprint.ca...
"jaybird" <nospam@me.com> wrote
news:DkU5f.4138$GQ.3775@tornado.texas.rr.com...
"_ G O D _" <demigod1@sprint.ca> wrote
news:oKT5f.382$713.1054@newscontent-01.sprint.ca...
You should go back to the origins of word pig, if you
still think that the pigs can only represent a livestock...
So do you use the term "*****" to describe African Americans? I take it that
you like to use condescending terms for those you do not like.
Choice of words used to convey one's thoughts
does not have to be (mis)interpreted in terms of
liking or disliking, for that matter, jaybird. Do you
really think that I'd be holding back my feelings
of animosity toward pigs, if I indeed, have them?
But even the term "*****" is considerably more
politically correct to describe a black person than
"African American," because true meaning of the
word "*****" means "black person," who may not
be (or think of oneself as) "African" or "American"...
Because in Europe, for example, black people are
usually neither Africans nor Americans. As a rule,
they are carrying nationalities of the countries of
residence or birth, depending on documentation...
I'm just flattered that you care enough about my profession to take time out of
your day to post about it so often.
Thank you for the appreciation of my time I ought to
spend in my genuine concerns about our world, pig...
--
_____________________________________________________
I intend to last long enough to put out of business all *****-suckers
and other beneficiaries of the institutionalized slavery and genocide.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"The army that will defeat terrorism doesn't wear uniforms, or drive
Humvees, or calls in air-strikes. It doesn't have a high command, or
high security, or a high budget. The army that can defeat terrorism
does battle quietly, clearing minefields and vaccinating children. It
undermines military dictatorships and military lobbyists. It subverts
sweatshops and special interests.Where people feel powerless, it
helps them organize for change, and where people are powerful, it
reminds them of their responsibility." ~~~~ Author Unknown ~~~~
___________________________________________________
--
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Another cop dies "in the line of duty" |
20 Oct 2005 08:23:19 PM |
|
|
jaybird wrote:
So do you use the term "*****" to describe African Americans? I take it
that you like to use condescending terms for those you do not like.
The leftists and their propaganda--the sham that is political
correctness--
have cultivated the idea (quite successfully I might add) that using
the word
"*****" (particularly when done by an Anglo white) is among the most
vile, wretched things one can do. A caucasoid heard to mutter "*****"
publicly is immediately subjected to ridicule, slander, defamation,
and quite often a loss of job/career. Has happened many times.
It's all part of the leftist agenda of destroying the fabric (largely
white and male) upon which our great country was built.
I'd guess that you are one of the white males who have bought into
this malarky, and think/speak/act as you've been taught, whether
you are aware of it or not. The lefists love guys like you (assuming
you belong to the group mentioned). I consider people like you
lemmings...you go along with the herd.
The fact is that "*****" is simply a word that describes an uncouth
black person, just as "redneck" is used for similar whites. The
latter is perfectly acceptable, the former extremely taboo. This
is the ***** that is political correctness. But the most
glaring of all examples is the continued wide acceptance of the
name Washington Redskins. I mean, how much more hilariously
hypocritical
can it get??? "*****" will get your white ***** tarred and feathered,
while the most hateful racial slur ever devised for a Native American
is perfectly okay, for an NFL team no less (in the nation's Capitol
no less)!!! Nearly every known Native American org. has asked
repeatedly for the name to be changed, but no cigar.
Political correctness is a sham of the first order.
I don't take it seriously, and neither should anybody else. Only
lemmings buy into it. You're only hurting yourself and your own
when you buy into it.
--
Cliff
.
|
|
|
| User: "_ G O D _" |
|
| Title: Re: Another cop dies "in the line of duty" |
21 Oct 2005 12:10:44 AM |
|
|
<clifffreeling@yahoo.com> wrote in
news:1129857799.573660.37570@g49g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
jaybird wrote:
So do you use the term "*****" to describe African Americans? I take it
that you like to use condescending terms for those you do not like.
The leftists and their propaganda--the sham that is political
correctness--
have cultivated the idea (quite successfully I might add) that using
the word
"*****" (particularly when done by an Anglo white) is among the most
vile, wretched things one can do. A caucasoid heard to mutter "*****"
publicly is immediately subjected to ridicule, slander, defamation,
and quite often a loss of job/career. Has happened many times.
It's all part of the leftist agenda of destroying the fabric (largely
white and male) upon which our great country was built.
I'd guess that you are one of the white males who have bought into
this malarky, and think/speak/act as you've been taught, whether
you are aware of it or not. The lefists love guys like you (assuming
you belong to the group mentioned). I consider people like you
lemmings...you go along with the herd.
The fact is that "*****" is simply a word that describes an uncouth
black person, just as "redneck" is used for similar whites. The
latter is perfectly acceptable, the former extremely taboo. This
is the ***** that is political correctness. But the most
glaring of all examples is the continued wide acceptance of the
name Washington Redskins. I mean, how much more hilariously
hypocritical
can it get??? "*****" will get your white ***** tarred and feathered,
while the most hateful racial slur ever devised for a Native American
is perfectly okay, for an NFL team no less (in the nation's Capitol
no less)!!! Nearly every known Native American org. has asked
repeatedly for the name to be changed, but no cigar.
Political correctness is a sham of the first
order. I don't take it seriously, and neither
should anybody else. Only lemmings buy
into it. You're only hurting yourself and your
own when you buy into it.
I think that political correctness is a very important
every in conversation to help people understand one
another correctly, to the point without sesquipedality.
Therefore, I don't see anything wrong with correctness
of all sorts, including in use of political terms. And in
agreeing with you, I must notice that you too were quite
politically correct in expressing your popular opinion...
But the sham meaning of PC, which was deliberately
invented and used for projection of distorted concept,
has nothing to do with genuine political correctness.
Because it's more about manipulation, censorship or
control of power, and therefore - conflict with the true
concept of "free speech" in the contemporary world...
--
_____________________________________________________
I intend to last long enough to put out of business all *****-suckers
and other beneficiaries of the institutionalized slavery and genocide.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"The army that will defeat terrorism doesn't wear uniforms, or drive
Humvees, or calls in air-strikes. It doesn't have a high command, or
high security, or a high budget. The army that can defeat terrorism
does battle quietly, clearing minefields and vaccinating children. It
undermines military dictatorships and military lobbyists. It subverts
sweatshops and special interests.Where people feel powerless, it
helps them organize for change, and where people are powerful, it
reminds them of their responsibility." ~~~~ Author Unknown ~~~~
___________________________________________________
--
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Another cop dies "in the line of duty" |
21 Oct 2005 07:49:20 AM |
|
|
_ G O D _ wrote:
I think that political correctness is a very important
every in conversation to help people understand one
another correctly, to the point without sesquipedality.
Therefore, I don't see anything wrong with correctness
of all sorts, including in use of political terms. And in
agreeing with you, I must notice that you too were quite
politically correct in expressing your popular opinion...
How was I being politically correct? Calling "Indians" Native
Amercian maybe? I've always felt that N.A. was quite accurate,
as they were here first. But is my opinion a popular one?
I'd sure like to think so. It's time folks woke the hell up.
But I never seem to hear anyone howling, demanding, even suggesting
that the Redskin name be eliminated, other than the N.A. organizations
that is.
But the sham meaning of PC, which was deliberately
invented and used for projection of distorted concept,
has nothing to do with genuine political correctness.
Because it's more about manipulation, censorship or
control of power, and therefore - conflict with the true
concept of "free speech" in the contemporary world...
I couldn't agree more.
--
Cliff
.
|
|
|
| User: "_ G O D _" |
|
| Title: Re: Another cop dies "in the line of duty" |
21 Oct 2005 12:57:15 PM |
|
|
<clifffreeling@yahoo.com> wrote
news:1129898960.112281.169930@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
_ G O D _ wrote:
I think that political correctness is a very important
in every conversation to help people understand one
another correctly to the point without sesquipedality.
Therefore, I don't see anything wrong with correctness
of all sorts, including in use of political terms. And in
agreeing with you, I must notice that you too were quite
politically correct in expressing your popular opinion...
How was I being politically correct? Calling "Indians" Native
Amercian maybe? I've always felt that N.A. was quite accurate,
as they were here first. But is my opinion a popular one?
If that's what you think I said, Cliff, then you obviously
misunderstood what I said. Because people should
use whatever words they deem necessary in order
to convey correct meaning, regardless of criticism
they may encounter because of it. Moreover, to be
politically correct, I have to tell you that the citizens
of US, who were born and live in their country, could
equally call themselves native americunts regardless
of their racial difference, lest choice of their religious
cults, if they happened to practice their superstitious,
or even - one-sided, bias and prejudicial - beliefs...
And your opinion can be called popular just on the
basis of its conforming with true concept of a "free
speech," which is not only being inspired by the
Universal Charter of Human Rights, but also being
shared by majority of population whose concept of
"freedom" is coincided with the UDHR - an official
code of conduct on our planet...
I'd sure like to think so. It's time folks woke the hell up.
But I never seem to hear anyone howling, demanding, even suggesting
that the Redskin name be eliminated, other than the N.A. organizations
that is.
But the sham meaning of PC, which was deliberately
invented and used for projection of distorted concept,
has nothing to do with genuine political correctness.
Because it's more about manipulation, censorship or
control of power, and therefore in conflict with the true
concept of "free speech" in the contemporary world...
I couldn't agree more.
I new you'd agree with me on that, because I earnestly
think that calling black people, all of them are native to
US, as "africunts."
--
_____________________________________________________
I intend to last long enough to put out of business all *****-suckers
and other beneficiaries of the institutionalized slavery and genocide.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"The army that will defeat terrorism doesn't wear uniforms, or drive
Humvees, or calls in air-strikes. It doesn't have a high command, or
high security, or a high budget. The army that can defeat terrorism
does battle quietly, clearing minefields and vaccinating children. It
undermines military dictatorships and military lobbyists. It subverts
sweatshops and special interests.Where people feel powerless, it
helps them organize for change, and where people are powerful, it
reminds them of their responsibility." ~~~~ Author Unknown ~~~~
___________________________________________________
--
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Another cop dies "in the line of duty" |
24 Oct 2005 01:23:33 PM |
|
|
_ G O D _ wrote:
I have to tell you that the citizens
of US, who were born and live in their country, could
equally call themselves native americunts regardless
of their racial difference,
Please don't stop there. For my own amusement, do tell how
you refer to *yourself*; other than GOD of course.
--
Cliff
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "jaybird" |
|
| Title: Re: Another cop dies "in the line of duty" |
21 Oct 2005 10:54:49 AM |
|
|
<clifffreeling@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1129857799.573660.37570@g49g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
jaybird wrote:
So do you use the term "*****" to describe African Americans? I take it
that you like to use condescending terms for those you do not like.
The leftists and their propaganda--the sham that is political
correctness--
have cultivated the idea (quite successfully I might add) that using
the word
"*****" (particularly when done by an Anglo white) is among the most
vile, wretched things one can do. A caucasoid heard to mutter "*****"
publicly is immediately subjected to ridicule, slander, defamation,
and quite often a loss of job/career. Has happened many times.
It's all part of the leftist agenda of destroying the fabric (largely
white and male) upon which our great country was built.
I'd guess that you are one of the white males who have bought into
this malarky, and think/speak/act as you've been taught, whether
you are aware of it or not. The lefists love guys like you (assuming
you belong to the group mentioned). I consider people like you
lemmings...you go along with the herd.
The fact is that "*****" is simply a word that describes an uncouth
black person, just as "redneck" is used for similar whites. The
latter is perfectly acceptable, the former extremely taboo. This
is the ***** that is political correctness. But the most
glaring of all examples is the continued wide acceptance of the
name Washington Redskins. I mean, how much more hilariously
hypocritical
can it get??? "*****" will get your white ***** tarred and feathered,
while the most hateful racial slur ever devised for a Native American
is perfectly okay, for an NFL team no less (in the nation's Capitol
no less)!!! Nearly every known Native American org. has asked
repeatedly for the name to be changed, but no cigar.
Political correctness is a sham of the first order.
I don't take it seriously, and neither should anybody else. Only
lemmings buy into it. You're only hurting yourself and your own
when you buy into it.
I agree. Good post.
--
---
jaybird
---
I am not the cause of your problems.
My actions are the result of your actions.
Your life is not my fault.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
