Religions > Atheism > Re: Another Win for Mt. Soledad Secular humanists lose again
| Topic: |
Religions > Atheism |
| User: |
"Little Boy & Fat Man" |
| Date: |
11 Dec 2006 12:40:17 PM |
| Object: |
Re: Another Win for Mt. Soledad Secular humanists lose again |
On Sun, 10 Dec 2006, "Dana" <raff242@yahoo.com> wrote:
http://www.aclj.org/TrialNotebook/Read.aspx?id=427
Another Win for Mt. Soledad
We applaud a decision by the California Court of Appeals yesterday
overturning a lower court decision that said a ballot proposition by San
Diego voters to donate the property on which the Mt. Soledad Memorial sits
to the federal government was unconstitutional. We filed an amicus brief in
the California case in support of the cross memorial and have filed briefs
at the federal level as litigation continues.
The California appeals court got it right. This decision clearly shows that
the ballot proposition was proper and constitutional in transferring the
land to the federal government. This decision represents another important
legal victory in the ongoing battle to keep the Mt. Soledad Memorial in
place.
In the 53-page decision, the three-judge panel for the California Court of
Appeal for the Fourth Appellate District unanimously held that the trial
court erred in invalidating the ballot proposition which cleared the way for
the City of San Diego to donate the property to the federal government. The
appeals court overturned the trial court decision saying that ballot
proposition did not violate the constitution.
Just two weeks ago, we filed an amicus brief with the U.S. Court of Appeals
for the Ninth Circuit on behalf of 22 members of Congress asking the appeals
court to dismiss a case against the City of San Diego challenging the
memorial because the federal government now owns the land on which the cross
sits.
Included in the 22 members of Congress represented in that brief is
California Congressman Duncan Hunter, who sponsored the federal legislation
that transferred control of the Mt. Soledad Memorial to the federal
government. That legislation was signed into law by President Bush in
August.
The Mount Soledad case has generated national interest as well with more
than 170,000 Americans - including more than 27,000 Californians - signing
on to our Petition to Preserve the Mt. Soledad Veterans Memorial.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
One note of complaint. Let us call a spade a spade. These
so-called "secular progressives", "humanists", etc., they
are Anti-Christs. I realize that media giants like Limbaugh,
O'Reilly, Coulter, Hannity, et al, they have to be careful
to couch or frame things in an audience-friendly way, and
that's perfectly understandable. But for the rest of us
non-Liberal non-Atheists, we need to call these _inhuman_
vermin exactly what they are: Cowards, Liars and Murderers!
Liberal Atheists are the mortal *enemy* of We the people
of these United States of America. We need to "negotiate"
with the A.C.L.U. like we "negotiated" with the Japanese
on August 6th & August 9th of 1945 anno Domini. When the
A.C.L.U.'s Liberal Atheist lawyers sign the unconditional
surrender, then, and only then, will we have anything to
talk about with our former enemy. But until then, *BOOM!*
That said...
Once our USSC rules in favor of this 29'-tall Mount Soledad
War Memorial (Easter) Latin Cross in San Diego, CA, that's
just one more victory that will serve to further enrage the
Rabidly-angry Anarchists of the Anti-Christian Liberal Union,
the A.C.L.U.: the most *DANGEROUS* organization in America!
It's funny, because the traditional Christian cross symbol
itself is hardly different from the common letter 'T', Tau
(most cruces are variously depicted like a lower-case 't'),
the major arcana character of Venus, the "ankh" of eternal
hope, beauty, balance, justice, passion, riches, the dance,
the evening-morning of humankind's creation, of all things
empowered by the Universal God VENERIS, the III Heaven and
Infinite Author of the tenth sermon or commandment, to wit:
"non concupisces domum proximi tui
not shall you covet the house of the neighbor yours,
nec desiderabis uxorem eius non
neither shall you desire the wife of the same, not
servum non ancillam non bovem non
the servant, nor the maidservant, not the ox, nor
asinum nec omnia quae illius sunt
the *****, neither any thing of that person's to be.
--Exodus 20:17, editio Vulgata;
interlinear translation by DJM
So, since the hard-line radical left-wing Liberal Atheists
want outlaw all religions except for Pinko Liberal Atheism,
then they should seek to outlaw every letter of the alphabet
and ban their usage entirely. Burn all the books! Delete all
written and verbal communications! And outlaw speech of any
kind across-the-board, as even babel is confusion by mixing.
Like all good things, all 22 of the sacred letters (of the
ten planets and twelve signs) come from God. So the A.C.L.U.
should do their damndest to ban their usage entirely, since
these Liberal Atheists HATE God, they HATE Family, and they
HATE Country! That's why their damned lamentable souls must
be exorcised to the profound pit where all Anti-Christs are
eternally-damned to Hellfire.
Merry Christmas & Io Saturnalia!
Daniel Joseph Min
http://www.2hot2cool.com/11/danieljosephmin/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
iQA/AwUBRX2flpljD7YrHM/nEQI9kwCeJ3UvpmNo8XEeVxQB+AJQvpziy88AoMpg
dAYWmO1VxCsuDNWtns9xKQeW
=AKmo
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
.
|
|
| User: "Conspiracy of Doves" |
|
| Title: Re: Another Win for Mt. Soledad Secular humanists lose again |
11 Dec 2006 01:00:28 PM |
|
|
Little Boy & Fat Man wrote:
On Sun, 10 Dec 2006, "Dana" <raff242@yahoo.com> wrote:
http://www.aclj.org/TrialNotebook/Read.aspx?id=427
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
One note of complaint. Let us call a spade a spade. These
so-called "secular progressives", "humanists", etc., they
are Anti-Christs. I realize that media giants like Limbaugh,
O'Reilly, Coulter, Hannity, et al, they have to be careful
to couch or frame things in an audience-friendly way, and
Excuse me? When have any of those people EVER been 'audience-friendly'?
They are all raging facists.
that's perfectly understandable. But for the rest of us
non-Liberal non-Atheists, we need to call these _inhuman_
vermin exactly what they are: Cowards, Liars and Murderers!
Please explain exactly when and how we have demonstrated any of those
traits
Liberal Atheists are the mortal *enemy* of We the people
of these United States of America. We need to "negotiate"
with the A.C.L.U. like we "negotiated" with the Japanese
on August 6th & August 9th of 1945 anno Domini.
Thank you for demonstrating exactly how unamerican you are. If you
disagree with someone, then they must be destroyed. Would it surprise
you to learn that the ACLU has defended the rights of Christians in the
past?
When the
A.C.L.U.'s Liberal Atheist lawyers sign the unconditional
surrender, then, and only then, will we have anything to
talk about with our former enemy. But until then, *BOOM!*
Violence is the only thing you can understand. Sad, really. Kind of
pathetic.
That said...
Once our USSC rules in favor of this 29'-tall Mount Soledad
War Memorial (Easter) Latin Cross in San Diego, CA, that's
just one more victory that will serve to further enrage the
Rabidly-angry Anarchists of the Anti-Christian Liberal Union,
the A.C.L.U.: the most *DANGEROUS* organization in America!
You seem to be under the assumption that the United States is a
Christian nation. It is not. Read the Constitution sometime. Not only
is there no mention of Christianity, but the only mention of religion
at all is to prohibit the government from enforcing religion on the
people.
It's funny, because the traditional Christian cross symbol
itself is hardly different from the common letter 'T', Tau
(most cruces are variously depicted like a lower-case 't'),
the major arcana character of Venus, the "ankh" of eternal
hope, beauty, balance, justice, passion, riches, the dance,
the evening-morning of humankind's creation, of all things
empowered by the Universal God VENERIS, the III Heaven and
Infinite Author of the tenth sermon or commandment, to wit:
And you believe that the similarity of different symbols somehow proves
something?
"non concupisces domum proximi tui
not shall you covet the house of the neighbor yours,
nec desiderabis uxorem eius non
neither shall you desire the wife of the same, not
servum non ancillam non bovem non
the servant, nor the maidservant, not the ox, nor
asinum nec omnia quae illius sunt
the *****, neither any thing of that person's to be.
--Exodus 20:17, editio Vulgata;
interlinear translation by DJM
'Covet' means 'want'. We aren't even allow to want things now?
So, since the hard-line radical left-wing Liberal Atheists
want outlaw all religions except for Pinko Liberal Atheism,
Please show when ANYONE on the liberal side of the political fence has
ever said that or demonstrated it through their actions.
then they should seek to outlaw every letter of the alphabet
and ban their usage entirely. Burn all the books! Delete all
written and verbal communications! And outlaw speech of any
kind across-the-board, as even babel is confusion by mixing.
You are a raving loon. You do realize that, don't you?
Like all good things, all 22 of the sacred letters (of the
ten planets and twelve signs) come from God.
No, all symbols are inventions of humans.
So the A.C.L.U.
should do their damndest to ban their usage entirely, since
these Liberal Atheists HATE God,
The ACLU is not an atheist organization. In fact, the president of the
ACLU is an ordained minister. And atheists don't hate god, we simply
don't believe that god exists -- in the same way that you don't believe
that Santa Claus exists.
they HATE Family,
No we don't. As a Christian, YOU are supposed to hate family. Jesus
told you to in Matthew 14:26
and they
HATE Country! That's why their damned lamentable souls must
be exorcised to the profound pit where all Anti-Christs are
eternally-damned to Hellfire.
Has it ever occurred to you to actually try to find out what we are
actually like instead of inventing the most evil type of people you can
imagine and simply deciding that is what we are like?
Merry Christmas & Io Saturnalia!
Daniel Joseph Min
http://www.2hot2cool.com/11/danieljosephmin/
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Dan" |
|
| Title: Re: Another Win for Mt. Soledad Secular humanists lose again |
11 Dec 2006 06:37:22 PM |
|
|
Little Boy & Fat Man wrote:
On Sun, 10 Dec 2006, "Dana" <raff242@yahoo.com> wrote:
http://www.aclj.org/TrialNotebook/Read.aspx?id=427
Another Win for Mt. Soledad
We applaud a decision by the California Court of Appeals yesterday
overturning a lower court decision that said a ballot proposition by San
Diego voters to donate the property on which the Mt. Soledad Memorial sits
to the federal government was unconstitutional. We filed an amicus brief in
the California case in support of the cross memorial and have filed briefs
at the federal level as litigation continues.
The California appeals court got it right. This decision clearly shows that
the ballot proposition was proper and constitutional in transferring the
land to the federal government. This decision represents another important
legal victory in the ongoing battle to keep the Mt. Soledad Memorial in
place.
In the 53-page decision, the three-judge panel for the California Court of
Appeal for the Fourth Appellate District unanimously held that the trial
court erred in invalidating the ballot proposition which cleared the way for
the City of San Diego to donate the property to the federal government. The
appeals court overturned the trial court decision saying that ballot
proposition did not violate the constitution.
Just two weeks ago, we filed an amicus brief with the U.S. Court of Appeals
for the Ninth Circuit on behalf of 22 members of Congress asking the appeals
court to dismiss a case against the City of San Diego challenging the
memorial because the federal government now owns the land on which the cross
sits.
Included in the 22 members of Congress represented in that brief is
California Congressman Duncan Hunter, who sponsored the federal legislation
that transferred control of the Mt. Soledad Memorial to the federal
government. That legislation was signed into law by President Bush in
August.
The Mount Soledad case has generated national interest as well with more
than 170,000 Americans - including more than 27,000 Californians - signing
on to our Petition to Preserve the Mt. Soledad Veterans Memorial.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
One note of complaint. Let us call a spade a spade. These
so-called "secular progressives", "humanists", etc., they
are Anti-Christs. I realize that media giants like Limbaugh,
O'Reilly, Coulter, Hannity, et al, they have to be careful
to couch or frame things in an audience-friendly way, and
that's perfectly understandable. But for the rest of us
non-Liberal non-Atheists, we need to call these _inhuman_
vermin exactly what they are: Cowards, Liars and Murderers!
Liberal Atheists are the mortal *enemy* of We the people
of these United States of America. We need to "negotiate"
with the A.C.L.U. like we "negotiated" with the Japanese
on August 6th & August 9th of 1945 anno Domini. When the
A.C.L.U.'s Liberal Atheist lawyers sign the unconditional
surrender, then, and only then, will we have anything to
talk about with our former enemy. But until then, *BOOM!*
That said...
Once our USSC rules in favor of this 29'-tall Mount Soledad
War Memorial (Easter) Latin Cross in San Diego, CA, that's
just one more victory that will serve to further enrage the
Rabidly-angry Anarchists of the Anti-Christian Liberal Union,
the A.C.L.U.: the most *DANGEROUS* organization in America!
It's funny, because the traditional Christian cross symbol
itself is hardly different from the common letter 'T', Tau
(most cruces are variously depicted like a lower-case 't'),
the major arcana character of Venus, the "ankh" of eternal
hope, beauty, balance, justice, passion, riches, the dance,
the evening-morning of humankind's creation, of all things
empowered by the Universal God VENERIS, the III Heaven and
Infinite Author of the tenth sermon or commandment, to wit:
"non concupisces domum proximi tui
not shall you covet the house of the neighbor yours,
nec desiderabis uxorem eius non
neither shall you desire the wife of the same, not
servum non ancillam non bovem non
the servant, nor the maidservant, not the ox, nor
asinum nec omnia quae illius sunt
the *****, neither any thing of that person's to be.
--Exodus 20:17, editio Vulgata;
interlinear translation by DJM
So, since the hard-line radical left-wing Liberal Atheists
want outlaw all religions except for Pinko Liberal Atheism,
then they should seek to outlaw every letter of the alphabet
and ban their usage entirely. Burn all the books! Delete all
written and verbal communications! And outlaw speech of any
kind across-the-board, as even babel is confusion by mixing.
Like all good things, all 22 of the sacred letters (of the
ten planets and twelve signs) come from God. So the A.C.L.U.
should do their damndest to ban their usage entirely, since
these Liberal Atheists HATE God, they HATE Family, and they
HATE Country! That's why their damned lamentable souls must
be exorcised to the profound pit where all Anti-Christs are
eternally-damned to Hellfire.
Well, the first moniker fits. Does the second?
"Stupid *****" is also applicable...
Dan
P.S. Don't bother. Yes, I do know.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Al Klein" |
|
| Title: Re: Another Win for Mt. Soledad Secular humanists lose again |
11 Dec 2006 05:13:08 PM |
|
|
On Mon, 11 Dec 2006 18:40:17 +0000 (GMT), Little Boy & Fat Man
<nobody@4096.net> wrote:
Liberal Atheists are the mortal *enemy* of We the people
of these United States of America.
We have met the enemy and they are us, huh?
You lost. Live with it. The majority doesn't want to live in your
theocracy.
Once our USSC rules in favor of this 29'-tall Mount Soledad
War Memorial (Easter) Latin Cross
Like the Republicans swept both houses?
that's just one more victory
Added to the monumental loss in the "November Surprise".
--
rukbat at optonline dot net
"Nothing in biology makes sense without evolution."
- Theodosuis Dobzhansky
(random sig, produced by SigChanger)
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "MarkA" |
|
| Title: Re: Another Win for Mt. Soledad Secular humanists lose again |
11 Dec 2006 05:25:22 PM |
|
|
On Mon, 11 Dec 2006 18:40:17 +0000, Little Boy & Fat Man wrote:
On Sun, 10 Dec 2006, "Dana" <raff242@yahoo.com> wrote:
http://www.aclj.org/TrialNotebook/Read.aspx?id=427 Another Win for Mt.
Soledad
We applaud a decision by the California Court of Appeals yesterday
overturning a lower court decision that said a ballot proposition by San
Diego voters to donate the property on which the Mt. Soledad Memorial
sits to the federal government was unconstitutional. We filed an amicus
brief in the California case in support of the cross memorial and have
filed briefs at the federal level as litigation continues. The California
appeals court got it right. This decision clearly shows that the ballot
proposition was proper and constitutional in transferring the land to the
federal government. This decision represents another important legal
victory in the ongoing battle to keep the Mt. Soledad Memorial in place.
In the 53-page decision, the three-judge panel for the California Court
of Appeal for the Fourth Appellate District unanimously held that the
trial court erred in invalidating the ballot proposition which cleared
the way for the City of San Diego to donate the property to the federal
government. The appeals court overturned the trial court decision saying
that ballot proposition did not violate the constitution. Just two weeks
ago, we filed an amicus brief with the U.S. Court of Appeals for the
Ninth Circuit on behalf of 22 members of Congress asking the appeals
court to dismiss a case against the City of San Diego challenging the
memorial because the federal government now owns the land on which the
cross sits.
Included in the 22 members of Congress represented in that brief is
California Congressman Duncan Hunter, who sponsored the federal
legislation that transferred control of the Mt. Soledad Memorial to the
federal government. That legislation was signed into law by President
Bush in August.
The Mount Soledad case has generated national interest as well with more
than 170,000 Americans - including more than 27,000 Californians -
signing on to our Petition to Preserve the Mt. Soledad Veterans Memorial.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
One note of complaint. Let us call a spade a spade. These so-called
"secular progressives", "humanists", etc., they are Anti-Christs. I
realize that media giants like Limbaugh, O'Reilly, Coulter, Hannity, et
al, they have to be careful to couch or frame things in an
audience-friendly way, and that's perfectly understandable. But for the
rest of us non-Liberal non-Atheists, we need to call these _inhuman_
vermin exactly what they are: Cowards, Liars and Murderers!
Liberal Atheists are the mortal *enemy* of We the people of these United
States of America. We need to "negotiate" with the A.C.L.U. like we
"negotiated" with the Japanese on August 6th & August 9th of 1945 anno
Domini. When the A.C.L.U.'s Liberal Atheist lawyers sign the unconditional
surrender, then, and only then, will we have anything to talk about with
our former enemy. But until then, *BOOM!*
That said...
Once our USSC rules in favor of this 29'-tall Mount Soledad War Memorial
(Easter) Latin Cross in San Diego, CA, that's just one more victory that
will serve to further enrage the Rabidly-angry Anarchists of the
Anti-Christian Liberal Union, the A.C.L.U.: the most *DANGEROUS*
organization in America!
It's funny, because the traditional Christian cross symbol itself is
hardly different from the common letter 'T', Tau (most cruces are
variously depicted like a lower-case 't'), the major arcana character of
Venus, the "ankh" of eternal hope, beauty, balance, justice, passion,
riches, the dance, the evening-morning of humankind's creation, of all
things empowered by the Universal God VENERIS, the III Heaven and Infinite
Author of the tenth sermon or commandment, to wit:
"non concupisces domum proximi tui
not shall you covet the house of the neighbor yours,
nec desiderabis uxorem eius non neither shall you
desire the wife of the same, not
servum non ancillam non bovem non the servant, nor the
maidservant, not the ox, nor
asinum nec omnia quae illius sunt the *****, neither
any thing of that person's to be.
--Exodus 20:17, editio Vulgata;
interlinear translation by DJM
So, since the hard-line radical left-wing Liberal Atheists want outlaw all
religions except for Pinko Liberal Atheism, then they should seek to
outlaw every letter of the alphabet and ban their usage entirely. Burn all
the books! Delete all written and verbal communications! And outlaw speech
of any kind across-the-board, as even babel is confusion by mixing.
Like all good things, all 22 of the sacred letters (of the ten planets and
twelve signs) come from God. So the A.C.L.U. should do their damndest to
ban their usage entirely, since these Liberal Atheists HATE God, they HATE
Family, and they HATE Country! That's why their damned lamentable souls
must be exorcised to the profound pit where all Anti-Christs are
eternally-damned to Hellfire.
Merry Christmas & Io Saturnalia!
Daniel Joseph Min
http://www.2hot2cool.com/11/danieljosephmin/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
iQA/AwUBRX2flpljD7YrHM/nEQI9kwCeJ3UvpmNo8XEeVxQB+AJQvpziy88AoMpg
dAYWmO1VxCsuDNWtns9xKQeW
=AKmo
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
OK, so the cross is now on federal land, instead of California land. It
is *still* a violation of the establishment clause. When the ***** are
they going to move that obscene eyesore to private property, where it
belongs? Is 17 years not enough time to find someone who wants the damn
thing?
--
MarkA
(this space accidentally filled in)
.
|
|
|
|

|
Related Articles |
|
|