"Desdinova" <desdinova@nodamnspam.com> wrote in message
news:WWrDc.164673$DG4.131316@fe2.columbus.rr.com...
"+Church of The Painful Truth+" <laserlover2ooo@yahoo.com> wrote in
message
news:eTrDc.63$Xn4.106640@news.uswest.net...
"Desdinova" <desdinova@nodamnspam.com> wrote in message
news:psqDc.164661$DG4.116113@fe2.columbus.rr.com...
"+Church of The Painful Truth+" <laserlover2ooo@yahoo.com> wrote in
message
news:XcqDc.549$AL2.40085@news.uswest.net...
"Desdinova" <desdinova@nodamnspam.com> wrote in message
news:zcoDc.164629$DG4.122402@fe2.columbus.rr.com...
"+Church of The Painful Truth+" <laserlover2ooo@yahoo.com> wrote
in
message
news:rWmDc.178$AL2.31408@news.uswest.net...
"Desdinova" <desdinova@nodamnspam.com> wrote in message
news:nJ6Dc.161433$DG4.145085@fe2.columbus.rr.com...
"+Church of The Painful Truth+" <laserlover2ooo@yahoo.com>
wrote
in
message
news:Sy6Dc.92$ky3.35031@news.uswest.net...
"Desdinova" <desdinova@nodamnspam.com> wrote in message
news:CE5Dc.161063$DG4.69067@fe2.columbus.rr.com...
"+Church of The Painful Truth+" <laserlover2ooo@yahoo.com>
wrote
in
message
news:HJ3Dc.57$ky3.28622@news.uswest.net...
"Desdinova" <desdinova@nodamnspam.com> wrote in message
news:gr1Dc.159579$DG4.8862@fe2.columbus.rr.com...
"+Church of The Painful Truth+"
<laserlover2ooo@yahoo.com>
wrote
in
message
news:a21Dc.51$ky3.23232@news.uswest.net...
Anthology Of Fools
Conflict Of Atheist & Believer
<snip lame attempt to show science proves god>>
You have once again proven you have no comprehension
of
science.
Or reality.
If you would study science without filtering it
through
your
bible,
you
might actually learn something.
Alas, that is too much to hope for.
--
aa #2182 Desdinova - EAC Harvester of Eyes
There are none so blind as those who view life
filtered
through the stained glass of church windows.
"Christianity has such a contemptible opinion of human
nature that it does not believe a man can tell the
truth
unless frightened by a belief in God. No lower opinion
of the human race has ever been expressed."
-- Robert Green Ingersoll
And you have proven that once again that article was
designed
for
you
:-)
I used to be a believer (years ago) but reading propaganda
similar
to
this
helped convince me that there is no way it is true. It
also
convinced
me
of
how desperately some hang on to faith and make every
excuse
for
the
existence of a god who logically can't exist. It cannot
even
be
reconciled
to it's own alleged teachings.
I understand your need to proselytize but most of us have
had
exposure
to
all the arguments for religion and cannot accept the
validity
of
your
writings.
Your cites from legitimate scientists are cut and pasted
out
of
context.
The
"creation scientists" you quote are discredited in the
scientific
community.
If you need to be dishonest to support claims for your
god,
perhaps
you
should examine your faith more closely.
If you have NEW evidence from the peer reviewed scientific
community
for
the
existence of god please provide it. Otherwise you are just
wasting
time.
Try thinking for yourself.
--
aa #2182 Desdinova - EAC Harvester of Eyes
There are none so blind as those who view life filtered
through the stained glass of church windows.
"Christianity has such a contemptible opinion of human
nature that it does not believe a man can tell the truth
unless frightened by a belief in God. No lower opinion
of the human race has ever been expressed."
-- Robert Green Ingersoll
Ho Hum,the small mentality of the atheist,If you have NEW
evidence
from
the
peer reviewed scientific community for the non-existence of
god
please
provide it. Otherwise you are just wasting time.
The burdon of proof is on the claimant. I don't need to prove
your
god
as
well as the Easter Bunny, Santa Claus, the Tooth Fairy and the
Invisible
Pink Unicorn don't exist. That's how it works. You need to
prove
your
god
exists.
Without proof you don't stand a chance of convincing anyone in
the
atheist
newsgroup. Like I said open your mind and a science textbook.
--
aa #2182 Desdinova - EAC Harvester of Eyes
There are none so blind as those who view life filtered
through the stained glass of church windows.
"Christianity has such a contemptible opinion of human
nature that it does not believe a man can tell the truth
unless frightened by a belief in God. No lower opinion
of the human race has ever been expressed."
-- Robert Green Ingersoll
The burdon of proof is on the claimant.
So you have the *burdon* of proof to claim there is no God
I don't need to prove your god as
well as the Easter Bunny, Santa Claus, the Tooth Fairy and the
Invisible
Pink Unicorn don't exist. That's how it works. You need to prove
your
god
exists.
Without proof you don't stand a chance of convincing anyone in
the
atheist
newsgroup. Like I said open your mind and a science textbook.
But you make the equally remarkable claim there is no God when
the
laws
of
science prove intelligent(not on your part)design.
No legitimate science proves that.
To say there is no God requires you to know all of the evidence
and
to
know
all of the evidence you must be like God.
I don't say there is no god. I assert that there insufficient
evidence
to
justify belief in a god.
+But to say there is insufficient evidence means that you have seen
all
of
the evidence and that is impossible+
Youre problem is that you hate God and that is why atheists
spend
so
much
time attacking their *invisible unicorn* :)
Very, very old tactic!
+Some truths never die+
I don't hate god anymore than I hate the Easter bunny or Santa
Claus.
I
can't hate what doesn't exist.
In discussions with atheists, I don't hear any evidence for the
validity
of
atheism. There are no "proofs" that God does not exist in atheist
circles;
at least, none that I have heard -- especially since you can't prove
a
negative regarding God's existence. Of course, that isn't to say
that
atheists haven't attempted to offer some proofs that God does not
exist.
But their attempted proofs are invariably insufficient.
You are the one posting in alt.atheism claiming that there is evidence
for
the existance of god and against evolution.
+Not only do I possess aphd in science but even with my mastery of
English
as my second language I still use a spell checker(something you should
try)+
We don't have to prove god doen't exist that's your task.
+And your task is to prove that there is no God before making that
remarkable claim+
Since the question of evolution has been settled for 150 years, you
need
to
provide evidence that clear shows that science is wrong.
+Evolution has been proven wrong and billed as science fiction
propagated
by
atheists on the university payrolls+
Too much fact goinfg against the theory these days and you hate that
don't
you :)
Now if you have indisputable evidence for the existance of god
please
present it.
+Love the short case :)--More proof you hate your God.
Since there are no proofs for atheism's truth and there are no
proofs
that
there is no God, the atheist must hold his position by faith.
Faith, however, is not something atheists like to claim as the
basis
of
adhering to atheism. Therefore, atheists must go on the attack and
negate
any evidences presented for God's existence in order to give
intellectual
credence to their position. If they can create an evidential vacuum
in
which no theistic argument can survive, their position can be seen
as
more
intellectually viable. It is in the negation of theistic proofs and
evidences that atheism brings its self-justification to
self-proclaimed
life.
You are so brainwashed by religion that you deny science.
+Actually is it science that has lead me to my religion,you are so
brainwashed by your faith the you deny science+
Whatever...
+That's your argument? Whatever?+
FACTS YOU SHOULD KNOW
First, evolution makes atheists out of people and lowers morality. Charles
Darwin, in a famous statement, admitted the fact. He said that, since people
were descended from apes, then mankind is totally untrustworthy and morally
bankrupt. Evolution teaches that savage competition and warfare is the
highest good and best source of development.
Second, evolution is riddled with fallacious thinking. As you will quickly
see in this series, evolution ignores the most obvious facts and twists and
misapplies evidence to fit its objective. Correct logical reasoning is based
upon correct premises; if the premises are wrong, the conclusions built upon
them will be skewed and unreliable. In the schools of today, evolutionists
teach men to ignore and misapply facts.
Third, evolution is false science-and most people, not having been trained
to work with scientific tools, feel unable to successfully reply to
"science." Please, do not let the subject buffalo you! The problem is not
science, but evolutionary interpretations. Although you may not have been
educated in scientific research methods, you can understand the basic facts;
and that is what counts. All that it takes is common sense. In these books,
you will read the facts and find that they disprove evolution.
It has been said that every fact of science can be explained either by
creation or evolution. Actually, that is not correct. Most scientific facts
can be explained better by creation than by evolution. Indeed, most facts
cannot be adequately explained by evolution at all!
Fourth, evolution floods the media and the schools with its message. It
seems impossible to withstand or oppose the deluge. Yet there is a way: Let
the people know the basic facts, so they can learn the truth for themselves.
The facts disproving evolution are not complicated. They appeal to thinking
minds far better than evolutionary myths.
Fifth, it is made to appear as if all the scientists are on the side of
evolutionary theory. Yet that is untrue. Many reputable scientists clearly
recognize its falsity (although there are also many who fear to speak up,
lest they lose their jobs). In this series, we provide you with thousands of
statements by scientists who do not believe in evolutionary theory.
.
