Re: Any testable hypothesis out there



 Religions > Atheism > Re: Any testable hypothesis out there

LINK TO THIS PAGE  


rating :  0   |  0


  Page 1 of 1

1

 
Topic: Religions > Atheism
User: "Pastor Frank"
Date: 19 Oct 2003 08:11:38 AM
Object: Re: Any testable hypothesis out there
"Harry Palmer" <xeno@mi6.xxx> wrote in message
news:Pine.BSF.4.31.0310182127010.45361-100000@localhost...

On Sat, 18 Oct 2003, Pastor Frank wrote:


Again, I need to remind you to keep the Christian definition of the

word

"God" firmly in mind when posting about God to our Christian NGs, for

our

Christian "God is love" (1 John 4:8,16).


Well, our society's infantile deification of love is probably rooted in
the alienation therein. Consider that the symbol of the absolute for
hundreds of millions of people out there is a tortured man nailed to a
log. Doesn't look like the inhabitants of Whoville are a happy lot.

... I honestly don't know what planet you come from, but here most
people want to love and experience true love desperately, sadly many
have to settle for paid love, or even no love at all.


So who is confusing love with sex in the above? Go to the mirror & talk to
that guy.


Some may even feel hated most times instead of loved. Ask them what
the love-less life is like, and Dollars to doughnuts the love-less
life makes people feel they live in hell. Wanna bet?


Put down the donuts & get a sensible diet.

This is hilarious in theological and philsophical NGs and needs to be
posted to news:alt.atheism LOL
--
Pastor Frank
## Both read the Bible day & night,
## But thou readst black where I read white.
(Anon)
---
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.525 / Virus Database: 322 - Release Date: 10/9/03
.

User: "Al Klein"

Title: Re: Any testable hypothesis out there 19 Oct 2003 09:28:27 PM
On Sun, 19 Oct 2003 09:11:38 -0400, "Pastor Frank"
<pfrank@christfirst.com> posted in alt.atheism:

"Harry Palmer" <xeno@mi6.xxx> wrote in message
news:Pine.BSF.4.31.0310182127010.45361-100000@localhost...

On Sat, 18 Oct 2003, Pastor Frank wrote:


Again, I need to remind you to keep the Christian definition of the

word

"God" firmly in mind when posting about God to our Christian NGs, for

our

Christian "God is love" (1 John 4:8,16).


Well, our society's infantile deification of love is probably rooted in
the alienation therein. Consider that the symbol of the absolute for
hundreds of millions of people out there is a tortured man nailed to a
log. Doesn't look like the inhabitants of Whoville are a happy lot.

... I honestly don't know what planet you come from, but here most
people want to love and experience true love desperately, sadly many
have to settle for paid love, or even no love at all.


So who is confusing love with sex in the above? Go to the mirror & talk to
that guy.


Some may even feel hated most times instead of loved. Ask them what
the love-less life is like, and Dollars to doughnuts the love-less
life makes people feel they live in hell. Wanna bet?


Put down the donuts & get a sensible diet.

This is hilarious in theological and philsophical NGs and needs to be
posted to news:alt.atheism LOL

The hilarious part, Frank, is that you're too stupid to know when
you're being put down.
--
"So much blood has been shed by the Church because of an omission from the Gospel: "Ye
shall be indifferent as to what your neighbor's religion is." Not merely tolerant of it,
but indifferent to it. Divinity is claimed for many religions; but no religion is great
enough or divine enough to add that new law to its code."
- Mark Twain, a Biography
(random sig, produced by SigChanger)
rukbat at optonline dot net
.

User: "Fred Stone"

Title: Re: Any testable hypothesis out there 19 Oct 2003 05:21:52 PM
Pastor Frank wrote:

"Harry Palmer" <xeno@mi6.xxx> wrote in message
news:Pine.BSF.4.31.0310182127010.45361-100000@localhost...

On Sat, 18 Oct 2003, Pastor Frank wrote:

Again, I need to remind you to keep the Christian definition of the


word

"God" firmly in mind when posting about God to our Christian NGs, for


our

Christian "God is love" (1 John 4:8,16).


Well, our society's infantile deification of love is probably rooted in
the alienation therein. Consider that the symbol of the absolute for
hundreds of millions of people out there is a tortured man nailed to a
log. Doesn't look like the inhabitants of Whoville are a happy lot.


... I honestly don't know what planet you come from, but here most
people want to love and experience true love desperately, sadly many
have to settle for paid love, or even no love at all.


So who is confusing love with sex in the above? Go to the mirror & talk to
that guy.



Some may even feel hated most times instead of loved. Ask them what
the love-less life is like, and Dollars to doughnuts the love-less
life makes people feel they live in hell. Wanna bet?


Put down the donuts & get a sensible diet.


This is hilarious in theological and philsophical NGs and needs to be
posted to news:alt.atheism LOL

Stay out of our pristine atheist newsgroups, you trolling hypocrite.
--
Fred Stone
Illegitimi non Carborundum
.

User: "sdq"

Title: Re: Any testable hypothesis out there 20 Oct 2003 10:14:23 AM
Pastor Frank wrote:

This is hilarious in theological and philsophical NGs and needs

to be

posted to news:alt.atheism LOL

Hey look ..... it's Fastor Prank :-)
sdq
.
User: "Mark K. Bilbo"

Title: Re: Any testable hypothesis out there 20 Oct 2003 06:43:35 PM
On Mon, 20 Oct 2003 11:14:23 -0400, sdq wrote:



Pastor Frank wrote:

This is hilarious in theological and philsophical NGs and needs

to be

posted to news:alt.atheism LOL


Hey look ..... it's Fastor Prank :-)

What? Blasted Flake?
--
Mark K. Bilbo
From alt.atheism only
.



  Page 1 of 1

1

 


Related Articles
Re: Any testable hypothesis out there
Re: Op-Ed: Intelligent design not testable; it can't be a scientific theory
Re: Op-Ed: Intelligent design not testable; it can't be a scientific theory
'God is not testable'
Re: Op-Ed: Intelligent design not testable; it can't be a scientific theory
Re: Op-Ed: Intelligent design not testable; it can't be a scientific theory
Re: Do Theories Have to be Testable to be Scientific?
Re: Do Theories Have to be Testable to be Scientific?
Re: Op-Ed: Intelligent design not testable; it can't be a scientific theory
Op-Ed: Evolution is religion; lacks testable evidence
Re: Op-Ed: Intelligent design not testable; it can't be a scientific theory
Re: ID is a testable scientific theory
Re: Hello is there intelligent life out there!!!!!
More on *Why* I'm a Skeptic (myself and many others out there I'm sure)
Proof of God's Existence for the Atheist Fundies out there
 

NEWER

pg.3585     pg.2749     pg.2106     pg.1612     pg.1232     pg.940     pg.716     pg.544     pg.412     pg.311     pg.234     pg.175     pg.130     pg.96     pg.70     pg.50     pg.35     pg.24     pg.16     pg.10     pg.6     pg.3     pg.1

OLDER