Free Lunch <lunch@nofreelunch.us>, the knocked-out leatherer, dirged:

On Tue, 11 Jul 2006 06:25:22 +0545, in alt.atheism
"Kadaitcha Man" <*****-you.ya.*****@kiss-my-big-black-*****.com> wrote in
<ms4le9$27r$n@incapacitated-tangerines.co.nz>:

Free Lunch <lunch@nofreelunch.us>, the servant who performs all the
menial tasks, pined:

On Mon, 10 Jul 2006 18:32:50 +0545, in alt.atheism
"Kadaitcha Man" <*****-you.ya.*****@kiss-my-big-black-*****.com> wrote
in <59h1nn$9k3$e@diminished-top-bollocks.org>:

Free Lunch <lunch@nofreelunch.us>, the ghastly tramp and fat
shunter who likes vicious wick dipping with jellyfish, and whose
partner is a street-hustler with a contagious fuzzy cup, wrote in
<m6g4b29p5iprn0mff0avt0o6corrl1kivb@4ax.com>:

On Mon, 10 Jul 2006 15:19:50 +0545, in alt.atheism
"Kadaitcha Man" <*****-you.ya.*****@kiss-my-big-black-*****.com> wrote
in <3c68go$bol$6@antiquated-mammoth-mammaries.com>:

Free Lunch <lunch@nofreelunch.us>, the twittering grifter and
tight back-door milkman who likes inhuman arousal with lampreys,
and whose partner is an one-way-girl with a wide mother theresa,
wrote in <rpb3b2hdtnnm2srjjvn5u0dppiijijg63v@4ax.com>:

On Mon, 10 Jul 2006 07:11:39 +0545, in alt.atheism
"Kadaitcha Man" <*****-you.ya.*****@kiss-my-big-black-*****.com>
wrote in <5wzdq1$ta5$l@suffering-flappers.com>:

JessHC <jesshc@phantomemail.com>, the skin-headed old man and
yeasty reamer who likes rough ***** pipe playing with pandas,
and whose partner
is a fast-girl with a puffy badly wrapped kebab, wrote in
<1152488793.710698.174290@m73g2000cwd.googlegroups.com>:

Kadaitcha Man wrote:

JessHC <jesshc@phantomemail.com>, the gurgling skid-row bum
and castrated *****-worker who likes relentless goob
loobin' with peacocks, and whose partner is a jam-tart with
a ghastly sperm bank, wrote in
<1152460452.660232.220830@35g2000cwc.googlegroups.com>:

Kadaitcha Man wrote:

jesshc <jesshc@phantomemail.com>, the gumming vagrant and
sedentary effie who likes vulgar zoo-style sex with pack
rats, and whose partner is a bankside lady with a smooth
growler, wrote in
<mT0sg.5311$ye3.1956@newsread1.news.pas.earthlink.net>:

I have yet to see any theist in this thread demonstrate
even an attempt to understand what atheism is<BITCHSLAP>

I have yet to see a single atheist write a coherent and
consistent definition of atheism.

Hey, look, you're lying again. It's good to see you never
get tired of that.

And your definition is?

Lack of theism.

Now you've made your job even harder because, instead of
defining your atheism, you must now define the theism, which
you supposedly lack. Since you lack it, you're going to be
hard pushed to define it.

Not my problem; I wouldn't presume to define the beliefs of
another. Too bad you don't like it, but again, not my problem.

No big deal. You now have to face the ignominy of being yet
another atheist fuckwit who cannot write a coherent and
consistent definition of atheism.

I'm sorry you have such a hard time understanding English. The
lack of belief in gods<BITCHSLAP>

Show how "Lack of theism" = "lack of belief in gods".

It's what the words mean.

So, by your logic, "Lack of X" = "lack of belief in X".

Nope. Theism is the belief in gods. The lack of belief in gods is
the lack of belief in gods.

So, would you classify a metaphysical X labelled, say, "evil
spirit", as a god?

I would, but I suppose some folks might claim to be atheists even
though they believe in supernatural claptrap. It seems to me that
they would be wrong.

Atheism makes you fucking stupid.

You claim that, but have so far proven otherwise.

Not so. Prima facie is prima facie, no matter how much you squirm.

You don't understand that concept either, do you.

On the notion of not understanding...

"I would, but I suppose some folks might claim to be atheists even though
they believe in supernatural claptrap. It seems to me that they would be
wrong."

Clearly, you are unable to posit a supposition and carry it for the sake of
grounding an argument without imposing your own bias and discrimination upon
it with your blitherings and meaningless observations. More fool you.

You have been deemed unworthy to receive enlightenment. You are dismissed.