"Frank Reichenbacher" <vesuvius@speakeasy.net> wrote in message
news:YJidnWSLvcOEvbDdRVn-ig@speakeasy.net...

"E.N." <egg@nospam.invalid> wrote in message
news:c0j1sj$dd6$1@beast.euro.net...

"Steve Makohin" <smakohin@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:smakohin-CD14BD.09483013022004@news.newsguy.com...

In article <c0if8o$300t$1@beast.euro.net>,
"E.N." <egg@nospam.invalid> wrote:

Now perhaps when you wrote 'right or wrong' you did not mean
"objectively factual" (i.e., truthful) or not. Perhaps you are using
it to mean "consistent with my subjective value system", as is the
case with respect to "morality." Science does not deal with
philosophy. It only deals with facts and reality.

So if you only deal with measurable fact, you can not make bold

statements

that God does NOT exist.

When did Steve say that science has determined that God does not exist?

In any case, science *can* say that there is no evidence that a God

exists.

real scientist do not exclude the existence of a god.