| Topic: |
Religions > Atheism |
| User: |
"The Reverend" |
| Date: |
21 Jul 2006 12:14:02 AM |
| Object: |
Re: Brits slam Israeli celebration of 1946 Terror Attack |
On 20 Jul 2006 16:30:37 -0700, "Ariadne" <ariadne.mac@gmail.com>
wrote:
Daniel Bernard wrote:
On Thu, 20 Jul 2006 17:27:53 -0400, "zr" <nglr@cogeco.ca> wrote:
Military Headquarters.
Same can be said for the PoWs captured by the Resistance in Palestine
and Lebanon. Military targets and therefore legitimate.
--
amicalement,
Daniel
Hostages are not PoWs,
There's a war on, therefore they're POWs, jew *****.
ibn sharmouta.
Such a yiddish already!
There is no "resistance" in Muslim terrorism.
What about jew terrorism, jew *****?
.
|
|
| User: "Daniel Bernard" |
|
| Title: Re: Brits slam Israeli celebration of 1946 Terror Attack |
21 Jul 2006 03:53:19 AM |
|
|
On Fri, 21 Jul 2006 05:14:02 GMT, (The
Reverend) wrote:
On 20 Jul 2006 16:30:37 -0700, "Ariadne" <ariadne.mac@gmail.com>
wrote:
Daniel Bernard wrote:
On Thu, 20 Jul 2006 17:27:53 -0400, "zr" <nglr@cogeco.ca> wrote:
Military Headquarters.
Same can be said for the PoWs captured by the Resistance in Palestine
and Lebanon. Military targets and therefore legitimate.
--
amicalement,
Daniel
Hostages are not PoWs,
There's a war on, therefore they're POWs, jew *****.
ibn sharmouta.
Such a yiddish already!
Well, it is some form of IC6 woggish.
--
amicalement,
Daniel
.
|
|
|
| User: "The Reverend" |
|
| Title: Re: Brits slam Israeli celebration of 1946 Terror Attack |
21 Jul 2006 04:17:38 AM |
|
|
On Fri, 21 Jul 2006 09:53:19 +0100, Daniel Bernard
<fifthhorseman@the.apocalypse> wrote:
On Fri, 21 Jul 2006 05:14:02 GMT, (The
Reverend) wrote:
On 20 Jul 2006 16:30:37 -0700, "Ariadne" <ariadne.mac@gmail.com>
wrote:
Daniel Bernard wrote:
On Thu, 20 Jul 2006 17:27:53 -0400, "zr" <nglr@cogeco.ca> wrote:
Military Headquarters.
Same can be said for the PoWs captured by the Resistance in Palestine
and Lebanon. Military targets and therefore legitimate.
--
amicalement,
Daniel
Hostages are not PoWs,
There's a war on, therefore they're POWs, jew *****.
ibn sharmouta.
Such a yiddish already!
Well, it is some form of IC6 woggish.
It sounds like one of those meat-on-a-stick raghead things.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Daniel Bernard" |
|
| Title: Re: Brits slam Israeli celebration of 1946 Terror Attack |
21 Jul 2006 05:16:25 AM |
|
|
On Fri, 21 Jul 2006 09:17:38 GMT, (The
Reverend) wrote:
On Fri, 21 Jul 2006 09:53:19 +0100, Daniel Bernard
<fifthhorseman@the.apocalypse> wrote:
On Fri, 21 Jul 2006 05:14:02 GMT, (The
Reverend) wrote:
On 20 Jul 2006 16:30:37 -0700, "Ariadne" <ariadne.mac@gmail.com>
wrote:
Daniel Bernard wrote:
On Thu, 20 Jul 2006 17:27:53 -0400, "zr" <nglr@cogeco.ca> wrote:
Military Headquarters.
Same can be said for the PoWs captured by the Resistance in Palestine
and Lebanon. Military targets and therefore legitimate.
--
amicalement,
Daniel
Hostages are not PoWs,
There's a war on, therefore they're POWs, jew *****.
ibn sharmouta.
Such a yiddish already!
Well, it is some form of IC6 woggish.
It sounds like one of those meat-on-a-stick raghead things.
Cheap pork, most likely.
--
amicalement,
Daniel
.
|
|
|
| User: "The Reverend" |
|
| Title: Re: Brits slam Israeli celebration of 1946 Terror Attack |
21 Jul 2006 07:40:52 AM |
|
|
On Fri, 21 Jul 2006 11:16:25 +0100, Daniel Bernard
<fifthhorseman@the.apocalypse> wrote:
On Fri, 21 Jul 2006 09:17:38 GMT, (The
Reverend) wrote:
On Fri, 21 Jul 2006 09:53:19 +0100, Daniel Bernard
<fifthhorseman@the.apocalypse> wrote:
On Fri, 21 Jul 2006 05:14:02 GMT, (The
Reverend) wrote:
On 20 Jul 2006 16:30:37 -0700, "Ariadne" <ariadne.mac@gmail.com>
wrote:
Daniel Bernard wrote:
On Thu, 20 Jul 2006 17:27:53 -0400, "zr" <nglr@cogeco.ca> wrote:
Military Headquarters.
Same can be said for the PoWs captured by the Resistance in Palestine
and Lebanon. Military targets and therefore legitimate.
--
amicalement,
Daniel
Hostages are not PoWs,
There's a war on, therefore they're POWs, jew *****.
ibn sharmouta.
Such a yiddish already!
Well, it is some form of IC6 woggish.
It sounds like one of those meat-on-a-stick raghead things.
Cheap pork, most likely.
The bits that are reserved for pet food!
.
|
|
|
| User: "Daniel Bernard" |
|
| Title: Re: Brits slam Israeli celebration of 1946 Terror Attack |
21 Jul 2006 08:45:15 AM |
|
|
On Fri, 21 Jul 2006 12:40:52 GMT, (The
Reverend) wrote:
The bits that are reserved for pet food!
Or Susiesnacks.
--
amicalement,
Daniel
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "bob young" |
|
| Title: Re: Brits slam Israeli celebration of 1946 Terror Attack |
21 Jul 2006 07:05:01 AM |
|
|
The Reverend wrote:
On 20 Jul 2006 16:30:37 -0700, "Ariadne" <ariadne.mac@gmail.com>
wrote:
Daniel Bernard wrote:
On Thu, 20 Jul 2006 17:27:53 -0400, "zr" <nglr@cogeco.ca> wrote:
Military Headquarters.
Same can be said for the PoWs captured by the Resistance in Palestine
and Lebanon. Military targets and therefore legitimate.
--
amicalement,
Daniel
Hostages are not PoWs,
There's a war on, therefore they're POWs, jew *****.
Wrong, in a war a ceasefire can be negotiated,
one cannot negotiate a ceasefgire with a fragnented terrorist organisation.
........and to be a POW you first need to wear a recognised military
uniform.
[I could add I supose, one needs to be a solder also,
and since soldiers do not fire automatice weapons into the air when they
celebrate
terrorist are far removed from ever being recognised as soldiers.
ibn sharmouta.
Such a yiddish already!
There is no "resistance" in Muslim terrorism.
What about jew terrorism, jew *****?
.
|
|
|
| User: "The Reverend" |
|
| Title: Re: Brits slam Israeli celebration of 1946 Terror Attack |
21 Jul 2006 09:53:36 AM |
|
|
On 21 Jul 2006 07:05:01 -0500, bob young <alaspectrum@netvigator.com>
wrote:
The Reverend wrote:
On 20 Jul 2006 16:30:37 -0700, "Ariadne" <ariadne.mac@gmail.com>
wrote:
Daniel Bernard wrote:
On Thu, 20 Jul 2006 17:27:53 -0400, "zr" <nglr@cogeco.ca> wrote:
Military Headquarters.
Same can be said for the PoWs captured by the Resistance in Palestine
and Lebanon. Military targets and therefore legitimate.
--
amicalement,
Daniel
Hostages are not PoWs,
There's a war on, therefore they're POWs, jew *****.
Wrong, in a war a ceasefire can be negotiated,
one cannot negotiate a ceasefgire with a fragnented terrorist organisation.
One certainly can.
.......and to be a POW you first need to wear a recognised military
uniform.
The 'Israeli' soldiers captured by Hezbollah do indeed wear such
uniforms.
[I could add I supose, one needs to be a solder also,
and since soldiers do not fire automatice weapons into the air when they
celebrate
terrorist are far removed from ever being recognised as soldiers.
What does this have to do with the 'Israeli' POWs?
.
|
|
|
| User: "bob young" |
|
| Title: Re: Brits slam Israeli celebration of 1946 Terror Attack |
21 Jul 2006 10:41:02 PM |
|
|
The Reverend wrote:
On 21 Jul 2006 07:05:01 -0500, bob young <alaspectrum@netvigator.com>
wrote:
The Reverend wrote:
On 20 Jul 2006 16:30:37 -0700, "Ariadne" <ariadne.mac@gmail.com>
wrote:
Daniel Bernard wrote:
On Thu, 20 Jul 2006 17:27:53 -0400, "zr" <nglr@cogeco.ca> wrote:
Military Headquarters.
Same can be said for the PoWs captured by the Resistance in Palestine
and Lebanon. Military targets and therefore legitimate.
--
amicalement,
Daniel
Hostages are not PoWs,
There's a war on, therefore they're POWs, jew *****.
Wrong, in a war a ceasefire can be negotiated,
one cannot negotiate a ceasefgire with a fragnented terrorist organisation.
One certainly can.
.......and to be a POW you first need to wear a recognised military
uniform.
The 'Israeli' soldiers captured by Hezbollah do indeed wear such
uniforms.
I know that you bloody fool but the terrosists were not wearing uniform
and never will, being basically insecure people, charged with religious fervour
plus hatred of any group that is smarter and richer than them.
nothing new in humans of course
[I could add I supose, one needs to be a solder also,
and since soldiers do not fire automatice weapons into the air when they
celebrate
terrorist are far removed from ever being recognised as soldiers.
What does this have to do with the 'Israeli' POWs?
.
|
|
|
| User: "The Reverend" |
|
| Title: Re: Brits slam Israeli celebration of 1946 Terror Attack |
21 Jul 2006 11:43:06 PM |
|
|
On 21 Jul 2006 22:41:02 -0500, bob young <alaspectrum@netvigator.com>
wrote:
The Reverend wrote:
On 21 Jul 2006 07:05:01 -0500, bob young <alaspectrum@netvigator.com>
wrote:
The Reverend wrote:
On 20 Jul 2006 16:30:37 -0700, "Ariadne" <ariadne.mac@gmail.com>
wrote:
Daniel Bernard wrote:
On Thu, 20 Jul 2006 17:27:53 -0400, "zr" <nglr@cogeco.ca> wrote:
Military Headquarters.
Same can be said for the PoWs captured by the Resistance in Palestine
and Lebanon. Military targets and therefore legitimate.
--
amicalement,
Daniel
Hostages are not PoWs,
There's a war on, therefore they're POWs, jew *****.
Wrong, in a war a ceasefire can be negotiated,
one cannot negotiate a ceasefgire with a fragnented terrorist organisation.
One certainly can.
.......and to be a POW you first need to wear a recognised military
uniform.
The 'Israeli' soldiers captured by Hezbollah do indeed wear such
uniforms.
I know that you bloody fool but the terrosists were not wearing uniform
and never will, being basically insecure people, charged with religious fervour
Why would terrorists want to wear uniforms? To make themselves more
visible?
plus hatred of any group that is smarter and richer than them.
nothing new in humans of course
It's just ragheads killing other ragheads. Who cares?
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
