"The Fool" <kands00@hotmail.com> wrote:
:|You all know Buckeye. For years, he has posted church-state articles
:|to political, atheist, religion, and education groups (all at the same
:|time). I just wanted to point out the irony here. While he is opposed
:|to religion in government, he has continued to cross post the same
:|posts to religious, educational, and political groups. In effect, he
:|is putting government posts in religious groups (preaching politics
:|from the pulpit) and preaching religion in government groups (putting
:|religion in government). He is a violation of his own principles.
Dear Moron, The Fool, internet nut case
Are you really as stupid as you appear to be on here or is this all one
big act?
For the sake of your family, especially your kids I hope that it one big
act.
Do you happen to see the flaw in your little discourse above? Or, is it
beyond you to understand?
I pay my nickle, I pay my dime. That entitleds me to post on here. I abide
by the rules of my ISP including their rules,&policy about "cross-posting."
Cox.net is not the government. Nor, is any of the newsgroups I post to the
government. Nor is Cox.net a religion or church, nor is any of the
newsgroups I post to a religion or church.
I am not the government nor am I a religion or church.
Thus, stupid, there is not violations of any principle.
However, I am always happy to find that I bug you so much.
*****************************************************************
Posting and reading from alt.politics.usa.constitution OR alt.education
You are invited to check out the following:
The Rise of the Theocratic States of America
http://members.tripod.com/~candst/theocracy.htm
American Theocrats - Past and Present
http://members.tripod.com/~candst/theocrats.htm
The Constitutional Principle: Separation of Church and State
http://members.tripod.com/~candst/index.html
[and to join the discussion group for the above site and/or Separation of
Church and State in general, listed below]
HRSepCnS · Hampton Roads [Virginia] SepChurch&State
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/HRSepCnS/
[Its not just Hampton Roads folks who are members, there are members from
all over the U.S. and a couple from overseas as well]
***************************************************************
.. . . You can't understand a phrase such as "Congress shall make no law
respecting an establishment of religion" by syllogistic reasoning. Words
take their meaning from social as well as textual contexts, which is why "a
page of history is worth a volume of logic." New York Trust Co. v. Eisner,
256 U.S. 345, 349, 41 S.Ct. 506, 507, 65 L.Ed. 963 (1921) (Holmes, J.).
Sherman v. Community Consol. Dist. 21, 980 F.2d 437, 445 (7th Cir. 1992)
.. . .
****************************************************************
THE CONSTITUTIONAL PRINCIPLE:
SEPARATION OF CHURCH AND STATE
http://members.tripod.com/~candst/index.html
****************************************************************
.
|
