"The Fool" <kands00@hotmail.com> wrote:
:|Does anyone have a clue why Buckeye's server protects him?
I don't have a server, I do have a ISP.
Protects me? From what, or who? You perhaps?
How do you figure my ISP protects me? I pay my nickel, I pay my dime. I
abide by the rules of my ISP.
:| I have,
:|myself, sent protests to his server,
So you believe in censorship, huh? Why doesn't that surprise me?
Man, I must scare the living daylights out of you for you to be so obsessed
with me.
:|but they have all been totally
:|ignored (not even responded to).
That ought to tell you something, dude.
It should tell you as much as I bug you, I am not braking any rules
established by my ISP. However, if you keep bugging them, they might turn
you in to your own ISP.
:| I don't see how anyone can send 10
:|posts within two minutes, 7 groups each post, and not be considered to
:|be spamming or trolling a group. Anyone have a clue?
Can to cite what rule says one can't post 10 posts in 2 minutes? if you
can't, maybe that is why my ISP ignores you. Considers you a flake
probably.
Did you notice how short they were?
Actually, I am providing a service I am providing food for thought, food
for discussion. latest news on church state in a easy way to find it for
those who don't have the time to look for such things .
No one is required to read them, to pay any attention to them, to reply to
them, to do anything about them.
It is a simple matter to create a filet and block my posts since they seem
to bother you so much.
:|Also, each of his posts are sent to political, education, atheism, and
:|christian groups. Tell me how any post could have all of those topics
:|in common. Seems like off topic spam to me.
My ISP seems to say your opinion is irrelevant in this matter.
:|Maybe if everyone sent an email of protest something would get done.
What would you like to have done?
Gee guy, not too long ago you said you were dedicating yourself to
countering me, is this what you meant, to try and have ne removed from the
newsgroups?
Damn, what a compliment that is, to know i have gotten so deep under your
skin.
*****************************************************************
Posting and reading from alt.politics.usa.constitution OR alt.education
You are invited to check out the following:
The Rise of the Theocratic States of America
http://members.tripod.com/~candst/theocracy.htm
American Theocrats - Past and Present
http://members.tripod.com/~candst/theocrats.htm
The Constitutional Principle: Separation of Church and State
http://members.tripod.com/~candst/index.html
[and to join the discussion group for the above site and/or Separation of
Church and State in general, listed below]
HRSepCnS · Hampton Roads [Virginia] SepChurch&State
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/HRSepCnS/
[Its not just Hampton Roads folks who are members, there are members from
all over the U.S. and a couple from overseas as well]
***************************************************************
.. . . You can't understand a phrase such as "Congress shall make no law
respecting an establishment of religion" by syllogistic reasoning. Words
take their meaning from social as well as textual contexts, which is why "a
page of history is worth a volume of logic." New York Trust Co. v. Eisner,
256 U.S. 345, 349, 41 S.Ct. 506, 507, 65 L.Ed. 963 (1921) (Holmes, J.).
Sherman v. Community Consol. Dist. 21, 980 F.2d 437, 445 (7th Cir. 1992)
.. . .
****************************************************************
THE CONSTITUTIONAL PRINCIPLE:
SEPARATION OF CHURCH AND STATE
http://members.tripod.com/~candst/index.html
****************************************************************
.
|
