Every one of the ten newsgroups xposted here was off
topic. You risk losing your account for your stupidity

SMChristenson wrote:

On Mon, 16 Feb 2004 11:35:42 +0000, The Plasmatron wrote:

In alt.atheism Warnock <warnnock@pop.co.za> wrote:

"The other Donald" <the_donald_13@yehaw2.com> wrote in message
news:2WxSb.8485$2J1.4604@fe1.texas.rr.com...

I can tell you this. I felt far more safe when Clinton was
President than now. I think most Americans did.

<Bumper sticker wisdom:>
"Please, God, give me eight more years of Clinton. I promise I
won't ***** it
away this time."

-DMc

More bumper sticker wisdom for 2004:
"Someone less dumb for President."

Evolvefish has lots of good stickers and buttons.

http://www.evolvefish.com

I love those guys.

I have their "Evolution fish humping jehovah fish" emblem on the
back of

my

truck, along with "No Gods, No Masters."

Effectively stirs the shitpot.....

****** But then again, there IS a God and people need to get used
to the idea!

--
**** The fact that the greatest scientists, to their utter dismay,
can't breath life into a dead body or create a perfect animal and
breath life into it - is PROOF of a higher intelligence! ****

** People who deny that there is a God, are not so convinced that
no God exists, but are using this denial as a crutch to get out of
having to comply with God's Law!**

Being a deist I probably shouldn't get into this debate, but I
just can't resist pointing out what a STUPID argument that is for
the existence of God. We lack more advanced technology, therefore
there is a god?! I mean, come on! We've got several things being
researched now that could resonably end up with scientests being
able to create animals from scratch, assembling them molecule by
molecule. For anything much less impressive than that we've
already got it.

Doctors REGULARLY save people who a hundred years ago would have
been considered well and thouraly dead, essentially bringing them
back to life. Look up "near death experience" on the web and
you'll find out just how "near" those experiences can be. So, just
off hand, I would say that's a big 'old "CHECK" on breathing life
into the dead. Give us another century and we'll start creating
and breathing life into engineered animals. Sure, christians will
call it an abomination, but almost all advancement, be it in
science or whatever, has been called an abomination by christians,
so why should anyone reasonable care?

I can respect that. An awful lot of argument for religion is based
on a leap from ignorance to, therefore, religion. It's easy to look
back 4000 years and say, "Boy, those people were ignorant." Not so
easy to imagine 4000 years from now when people will look back on us
and say, "Boy, those people were ignorant."

Far from fire-breathing hubris, I think you will find a strong vein
of humility before our still-overwhelming ignorance in a lot of
atheists.