Re: Bush-Dry Drunk I, II, & II


 Religions > Atheism > Re: Bush-Dry Drunk I, II, & II

LINK TO THIS PAGE  


rating :  0   |  0


  Page 1 of 1

1
 
Topic: Religions > Atheism
User: "stoney"
Date: 01 Apr 2004 11:20:27 AM
Object: Re: Bush-Dry Drunk I, II, & II
On Wed, 31 Mar 2004 13:59:31 GMT, Fred Stone <fstone69@earthling.com>,
Message ID: <Xns94BD5B796AA68fstone69@207.69.154.202> wrote in
alt.atheism;

Elroy Willis <elo@airmail.net> wrote in
news:46bl601q9rk6ihf8j198g993bbh61nk9t6@4ax.com:

johac <jhachm@ixpresremove.com> wrote in alt.atheism

stoney <stoney@the.net> wrote:


<snips>


First, in this essay, we will look at the
characteristics of the so-called "dry drunk;"
then we will see if they apply to this
individual, our president; and then we
will review his drinking history for the
record. What is the dry drunk syndrome?
"Dry drunk" traits consist of:


* Exaggerated self-importance and pomposity
* Grandiose behavior
* A rigid, judgmental outlook
* Impatience
* Childish behavior
* Irresponsible behavior
* Irrational rationalization
* Projection
* Overreaction


What a perfect description. How did this guy ever get elected? Oh,
that's right, he didn't.


Watch out, or Fred might come after you!


I've given up on them. Might as well argue with duke.

You do nothing but drool, Fred. You and Puke are two peas in a pod.


Stoney
"Designated Rascal and Rapscallion
and
SCAMPERMEISTER!"
When in doubt, SCAMPER about!
When things are fair, SCAMPER everywhere!
When things are rough, can't SCAMPER enough!
/end humour alert
alt.atheism military veteran #11
{so much for the 'no atheists in foxholes' rubbish}
.

User: "Fred Stone"

Title: Re: Bush-Dry Drunk I, II, & II 01 Apr 2004 12:00:52 PM
stoney <stoney@the.net> wrote in news:pqjo60p43vihad1696dhbubfjjhdpis5o3
@4ax.com:

On Wed, 31 Mar 2004 13:59:31 GMT, Fred Stone <fstone69@earthling.com>,
Message ID: <Xns94BD5B796AA68fstone69@207.69.154.202> wrote in
alt.atheism;

Elroy Willis <elo@airmail.net> wrote in
news:46bl601q9rk6ihf8j198g993bbh61nk9t6@4ax.com:

johac <jhachm@ixpresremove.com> wrote in alt.atheism

stoney <stoney@the.net> wrote:


<snips>


First, in this essay, we will look at the
characteristics of the so-called "dry drunk;"
then we will see if they apply to this
individual, our president; and then we
will review his drinking history for the
record. What is the dry drunk syndrome?
"Dry drunk" traits consist of:


* Exaggerated self-importance and pomposity
* Grandiose behavior
* A rigid, judgmental outlook
* Impatience
* Childish behavior
* Irresponsible behavior
* Irrational rationalization
* Projection
* Overreaction


What a perfect description. How did this guy ever get elected? Oh,
that's right, he didn't.


Watch out, or Fred might come after you!


I've given up on them. Might as well argue with duke.


You do nothing but drool, Fred. You and Puke are two peas in a pod.

More insults from a Bush-basher. Gee, I'm so ashamed of myself.
--
Fred Stone
aa# 1369
Cthulhu for President! Why vote for a lesser evil?
.
User: "Elroy Willis"

Title: Re: Bush-Dry Drunk I, II, & II 01 Apr 2004 12:52:11 PM
Fred Stone <fstone69@earthling.com> wrote in alt.atheism

stoney <stoney@the.net> wrote in

Fred Stone <fstone69@earthling.com> wrote in alt.atheism;

Elroy Willis <elo@airmail.net> wrote in

johac <jhachm@ixpresremove.com> wrote in alt.atheism

stoney <stoney@the.net> wrote:
<snips>

First, in this essay, we will look at the
characteristics of the so-called "dry drunk;"
then we will see if they apply to this
individual, our president; and then we
will review his drinking history for the
record. What is the dry drunk syndrome?
"Dry drunk" traits consist of:
* Exaggerated self-importance and pomposity
* Grandiose behavior
* A rigid, judgmental outlook
* Impatience
* Childish behavior
* Irresponsible behavior
* Irrational rationalization
* Projection
* Overreaction

What a perfect description. How did this guy ever get elected? Oh,
that's right, he didn't.

Watch out, or Fred might come after you!

I've given up on them. Might as well argue with duke.

You do nothing but drool, Fred. You and Puke are two peas in a pod.

More insults from a Bush-basher. Gee, I'm so ashamed of myself.

When you keep trying to support Bush, what do you expect?
You'd be better off supporting the bush between the legs in
my opinion. :) You know, fur pies and tacos. Opening a porno
site, or picking on Clinton and the Whitehouse blowjobs...
--
Elroy Willis
EAP Chief Editor and Newshound
http://web2.airmail.net/~elo/news
.
User: "Fred Stone"

Title: Re: Bush-Dry Drunk I, II, & II 01 Apr 2004 02:30:45 PM
Elroy Willis <elo@airmail.net> wrote in
news:ejoo601163jd9v76ic7b1oa82tsemmjbld@4ax.com:

Fred Stone <fstone69@earthling.com> wrote in alt.atheism

stoney <stoney@the.net> wrote in

Fred Stone <fstone69@earthling.com> wrote in alt.atheism;

Elroy Willis <elo@airmail.net> wrote in

johac <jhachm@ixpresremove.com> wrote in alt.atheism

stoney <stoney@the.net> wrote:


<snips>


First, in this essay, we will look at the
characteristics of the so-called "dry drunk;"
then we will see if they apply to this
individual, our president; and then we
will review his drinking history for the
record. What is the dry drunk syndrome?
"Dry drunk" traits consist of:


* Exaggerated self-importance and pomposity
* Grandiose behavior
* A rigid, judgmental outlook
* Impatience
* Childish behavior
* Irresponsible behavior
* Irrational rationalization
* Projection
* Overreaction


What a perfect description. How did this guy ever get elected?
Oh, that's right, he didn't.


Watch out, or Fred might come after you!


I've given up on them. Might as well argue with duke.


You do nothing but drool, Fred. You and Puke are two peas in a pod.


More insults from a Bush-basher. Gee, I'm so ashamed of myself.


When you keep trying to support Bush, what do you expect?

I get a kick out of the shrieks and the insults when I simply refuse to
accept the Democratic party line talking points as Gospel. You'd think
that regular posters on alt.atheism would know better than to post
fallacies that they'd never let a theist get away with.

You'd be better off supporting the bush between the legs in
my opinion. :) You know, fur pies and tacos.

Furburger and thighs, to eat out. :-)

Opening a porno site, or picking on Clinton and the Whitehouse
blowjobs...

Careful there or they'll call you names too.
--
Fred Stone
aa# 1369
Cthulhu for President! Why vote for a lesser evil?
.
User: "Elroy Willis"

Title: Re: Bush-Dry Drunk I, II, & II 01 Apr 2004 02:58:38 PM
Fred Stone <fstone69@earthling.com> wrote in alt.atheism
<snip>

I get a kick out of the shrieks and the insults when I simply refuse to
accept the Democratic party line talking points as Gospel.

"Talking points?"
The first time I heard that phrase, it came from the mouth or fingers
of georgann... Make of that what you will... I wonder exactly who
it was that first made that particular phrase popular, do you know?

You'd think that regular posters on alt.atheism would know better
than to post fallacies that they'd never let a theist get away with.

All's fair in love, war, and politics, and political satire and
politician-bashing, so I've heard... Come election time, those
things can create a real mess...

You'd be better off supporting the bush between the legs in
my opinion. :) You know, fur pies and tacos.

Furburger and thighs, to eat out. :-)

Opening a porno site, or picking on Clinton and the Whitehouse
blowjobs...

Careful there or they'll call you names too.

Not fair to pick on a Democrat and Republican at the same time,
eh? :-)
--
Elroy Willis
EAP Chief Editor and Newshound
http://web2.airmail.net/~elo/news
.
User: "Fred Stone"

Title: Re: Bush-Dry Drunk I, II, & II 01 Apr 2004 03:56:12 PM
Elroy Willis <elo@airmail.net> wrote in
news:i30p60dirav3bkaujv6g9ka4fqvjprkv3m@4ax.com:

Fred Stone <fstone69@earthling.com> wrote in alt.atheism

<snip>

I get a kick out of the shrieks and the insults when I simply refuse
to accept the Democratic party line talking points as Gospel.


"Talking points?"

In general it's just a somewhat organized summary of arguments about a
topic.

The first time I heard that phrase, it came from the mouth or fingers
of georgann... Make of that what you will... I wonder exactly who
it was that first made that particular phrase popular, do you know?

Our debate coach back in high school used it. He'd assign a topic and we
had to come up with "talking points" on both sides of the issue that
we'd use as headings on index cards, and then list as many rebuttals as
would fit on the card. Very handy in a live debate, you'd already have
your references to rebut what your opponent said. Unless they came up
with something *really* original.
georgann doesn't quite seem to grasp that part of it or she'd be taking
notes.

You'd think that regular posters on alt.atheism would know better
than to post fallacies that they'd never let a theist get away with.


All's fair in love, war, and politics, and political satire and
politician-bashing, so I've heard... Come election time, those
things can create a real mess...

It gets old fast. Only seven more months of it. Just think how shrill
stoney and Yang will get. :-(

You'd be better off supporting the bush between the legs in
my opinion. :) You know, fur pies and tacos.


Furburger and thighs, to eat out. :-)


Opening a porno site, or picking on Clinton and the Whitehouse
blowjobs...


Careful there or they'll call you names too.


Not fair to pick on a Democrat and Republican at the same time,
eh? :-)

Pickers-on-democrats are underrepresented here; I'm just doing my part
for affirmative action. ;-)
--
Fred Stone
aa# 1369
Cthulhu for President! Why vote for a lesser evil?
.






  Page 1 of 1

1
 


Related Articles
 

NEWER
pg.3585     pg.2749     pg.2106     pg.1612     pg.1232     pg.940     pg.716     pg.544     pg.412     pg.311     pg.234     pg.175     pg.130     pg.96     pg.70     pg.50     pg.35     pg.24     pg.16     pg.10     pg.6     pg.3     pg.1

OLDER