On Wed, 31 Mar 2004 16:29:52 -0600, "Mark K. Bilbo" <y@hoo.com-amikchi>
wrote in message <pan.2004.03.31.22.29.51.142504@hoo.com-amikchi>:
On Wed, 31 Mar 2004 13:47:44 -0500 in episode
<lN6dnQPsZpkZjPbd4p2dnA@comcast.com> we saw our hero "Osprey"
<noneedtoknow@mail.com>:
"quibbler" <quibbler247@yahoo.com> wrote in message
In article <Xns94BD5CC0C3257xomicron@130.133.1.4>,
says...
Actually Clinton lost more jobs in his first term than Bush did.
Clinton added 10 million more jobs to payrolls at the end of his first
term than
there were when he took office. Clearly Clinton kicked Bush's *****.
Specifically, tell us how Clinton added 10 million more jobs.
Hm...
Jan 1993 109.725 million employed
Jan 1997 121.232 million employed
Difference being 11.5 million.
Or looked at another way, at the same time in his first term, it was:
Jan 1996 118.192 million employed
Which is an increase of about 8.5 million.
Now, if you want to say the president's policies *don't *matter, okay. But
then again that means there's no reason to *keep Bush either...
Bush might give us another war though. gotta hold out for the entertainment
value.
see if Kerry is prepared to give us a war. i want bigger bombs, more
exciting graphics, more special ops, more varied scenarios... and i want
Iran and Syria invaded.
--
smash yer modem, reboot, kill yerself
Mel the Defiler
member, ATJ regs
webmaster of atjfaq.com
http://www.atjfaq.com/
.
