| Topic: |
Religions > Atheism |
| User: |
"" |
| Date: |
19 Dec 2006 11:19:46 AM |
| Object: |
Re: Bush "science" |
Too many lousy works have been labelled as scientific. The
Administration should be
laudaded for setting standard.
Very often some loosers have been trying to pass their ideologies off
as Science, it is time
to stop those impostors. Bush should be laudaded
hbarwood@troy.edu wrote:
Be very, very afraid!
http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/national/1152AP_Bush_Scientists.html?source=mypi
HB
.
|
|
| User: "Ford T. FreezerClown" |
|
| Title: Re: Bush "science" |
19 Dec 2006 12:22:25 PM |
|
|
<Codebreaker@bigsecret.com> wrote in message
news:1166548786.316456.264130@f1g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
Too many lousy works have been labelled as scientific. The
Administration should be
laudaded for setting standard.
Very often some loosers have been trying to pass their ideologies off
as Science, it is time
to stop those impostors. Bush should be laudaded
It seems this child has been left behind.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Rob Brown" |
|
| Title: Re: Bush "science" |
19 Dec 2006 11:36:18 AM |
|
|
<Codebreaker@bigsecret.com> wrote in message
news:1166548786.316456.264130@f1g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
Too many lousy works have been labelled as scientific. The
Administration should be
laudaded for setting standard.
Very often some loosers have been trying to pass their ideologies off
as Science, it is time
to stop those impostors. Bush should be laudaded
Is that you George? You are and always will be an idiot.
Rob Brown
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "LC" |
|
| Title: Re: Bush "science" |
19 Dec 2006 11:50:17 AM |
|
|
"Laudaded" all around Usenet, <Codebreaker@bigsecret.com> wrote in message
news:1166548786.316456.264130@f1g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
Too many lousy works have been labelled as scientific. The
Administration should be
laudaded for setting standard.
Very often some loosers have been trying to pass their ideologies off
as Science, it is time
to stop those impostors. Bush should be laudaded
Another home-schooled 'tard heard from.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Marc" |
|
| Title: Re: Bush "science" |
19 Dec 2006 07:17:18 PM |
|
|
wrote:
Bush should be laudaded
That's not how to spell "impeached", but thanks
for the thought.
(signed) marc
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "John Bode" |
|
| Title: Re: Bush "science" |
19 Dec 2006 02:23:21 PM |
|
|
wrote:
Too many lousy works have been labelled as scientific. The
Administration should be
laudaded for setting standard.
Laudaded?
Here's a hint, try reading your post out loud before hitting the send
button.
Very often some loosers have been trying to pass their ideologies off
as Science, it is time
to stop those impostors.
Judge Jones' ID smackdown was a good start.
BTW, how did we manage to produce a generation that made it through 12
years of public school and 4 years of college and never managed to
learn the difference between "loose" and "lose?" I came out of the
store a while back and there was a flyer stuck to the windshield with
the heading "LOOSE WEIGHT" in 72-point type. Obviously, this was meant
as a public safety announcement; Kirstie Alley had just dropped 100
lbs, and obviously it was wreaking havoc across the countryside, so the
purpose of this flyer was to tell us to stay indoors until it was safe,
right?
But no. It was just a *stupid* spelling mistake, which is finding its
way into various print advertisements from allegedly professional
organizations.
You loose an arrow. You loose the hounds. You lose a race. You lose
your mind.
I fear for the future of America.
Bush should be laudaded
Where the hell did you get "laudaded," anyway?
hbarwood@troy.edu wrote:
Be very, very afraid!
http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/national/1152AP_Bush_Scientists.html?source=mypi
HB
.
|
|
|
| User: "Gerry Murphy" |
|
| Title: Re: Bush "science" |
19 Dec 2006 05:44:56 PM |
|
|
"John Bode" <john_bode@my-deja.com> wrote in message
news:1166559801.725982.21940@a3g2000cwd.googlegroups.com...
Codebreaker@bigsecret.com wrote:
Too many lousy works have been labelled as scientific. The
Administration should be
laudaded for setting standard.
Laudaded?
Here's a hint, try reading your post out loud before hitting the send
button.
Very often some loosers have been trying to pass their ideologies off
as Science, it is time
to stop those impostors.
Judge Jones' ID smackdown was a good start.
BTW, how did we manage to produce a generation that made it through 12
years of public school and 4 years of college and never managed to
learn the difference between "loose" and "lose?" I came out of the
store a while back and there was a flyer stuck to the windshield with
the heading "LOOSE WEIGHT" in 72-point type. Obviously, this was meant
as a public safety announcement; Kirstie Alley had just dropped 100
lbs, and obviously it was wreaking havoc across the countryside, so the
purpose of this flyer was to tell us to stay indoors until it was safe,
right?
But no. It was just a *stupid* spelling mistake, which is finding its
way into various print advertisements from allegedly professional
organizations.
You loose an arrow. You loose the hounds. You lose a race. You lose
your mind.
That one drives me up the wall too, like fingernails on a chalkboard.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Jeffrey Turner" |
|
| Title: Re: Bush "science" |
19 Dec 2006 07:29:44 PM |
|
|
John Bode wrote:
Codebreaker@bigsecret.com wrote:
Bush should be laudaded
Where the hell did you get "laudaded," anyway?
The Woody Woodpecker school of spelling?
--Jeff
--
War cannot be humanized. It can only be abolished.
--Albert Einstein
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Al Klein" |
|
| Title: Re: Bush "science" |
19 Dec 2006 10:28:31 PM |
|
|
On 19 Dec 2006 12:23:21 -0800, "John Bode" <john_bode@my-deja.com>
wrote:
You loose an arrow. You loose the hounds. You lose a race. You lose
your mind.
I fear for the future of America.
Spelling is now optional. Choice of homonym is optional. Grammar is
grab-as-grab-can.
And that's what will be running the country in 25 years.
--
rukbat at optonline dot net
"For aught we know a priori, matter may contain the source, or spring, of order
originating within itself, as well as the mind does."
- David Hume, Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion
(random sig, produced by SigChanger)
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Conspiracy of Doves" |
|
| Title: Re: Bush "science" |
19 Dec 2006 11:49:52 AM |
|
|
wrote:
Too many lousy works have been labelled as scientific. The
Administration should be
laudaded for setting standard.
Very often some loosers have been trying to pass their ideologies off
as Science, it is time
to stop those impostors. Bush should be laudaded
Bush IS one of the losers who have been trying to pass their ideologies
off as science.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "dogbert321" |
|
| Title: Re: Bush "science" |
19 Dec 2006 10:29:14 PM |
|
|
wrote:
Too many lousy works have been labelled as scientific. The
Administration should be
laudaded for setting standard.
Very often some loosers have been trying to pass their ideologies off
as Science, it is time
to stop those impostors. Bush should be laudaded
hbarwood@troy.edu wrote:
Be very, very afraid!
http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/national/1152AP_Bush_Scientists.html?source=mypi
HB
Sounds like a moron escaped from the looney bin.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "jcon" |
|
| Title: Re: Bush "science" |
19 Dec 2006 11:26:11 AM |
|
|
wrote:
Too many lousy works have been labelled as scientific. The
Administration should be
laudaded for setting standard.
Very often some loosers have been trying to pass their ideologies off
as Science, it is time
to stop those impostors. Bush should be laudaded
Damn right! He should be "laudaded" until he squeals like
a pig.
-jc
.
|
|
|
| User: "Brian Westley" |
|
| Title: Re: Bush "science" |
19 Dec 2006 12:05:56 PM |
|
|
"jcon" <cirejcon@yahoo.com> writes:
Codebrea...@bigsecret.com wrote:
Too many lousy works have been labelled as scientific. The
Administration should be
laudaded for setting standard.
Very often some loosers have been trying to pass their ideologies off
as Science, it is time
to stop those impostors. Bush should be laudaded
Damn right! He should be "laudaded" until he squeals like
a pig.
I hear he's often loadaded to the gills.
---
Merlyn LeRoy
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Desertphile" |
|
| Title: Re: Bush "science" |
19 Dec 2006 07:19:52 PM |
|
|
wrote:
Too many lousy works have been labelled as scientific. The
Administration should be
laudaded for setting standard.
Very often some loosers have been trying to pass their ideologies off
as Science, it is time
to stop those impostors. Bush should be laudaded
Damn right! We need to stamp out Jewish Science!
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Bush "science" |
19 Dec 2006 02:45:45 PM |
|
|
wrote:
Too many lousy works have been labelled as scientific. The
Administration should be
laudaded for setting standard.
Very often some loosers have been trying to pass their ideologies off
as Science, it is time
to stop those impostors. Bush should be laudaded
If what you mean by "laudaded" is "treated with vast quantities of
laudanum", I couldn't agree more.
Chris
hbarwood@troy.edu wrote:
Be very, very afraid!
http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/national/1152AP_Bush_Scientists.html?source=mypi
HB
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Olrik" |
|
| Title: Re: Bush "science" |
19 Dec 2006 10:27:05 PM |
|
|
wrote:
Too many lousy works have been labelled as scientific. The
Administration should be
laudaded for setting standard.
Very often some loosers have been trying to pass their ideologies off
as Science, it is time
to stop those impostors. Bush should be laudaded
Stop drinking the cheap stuff, cb. It's going to destroy the few
neurons you have left.
Olrik
hbarwood@troy.edu wrote:
Be very, very afraid!
http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/national/1152AP_Bush_Scientists.html?source=mypi
HB
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Tim McGaughy" |
|
| Title: Re: Bush "science" |
19 Dec 2006 09:44:14 PM |
|
|
From:
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Newsgroups: talk.origins,alt.atheism,alt.bible,alt.politics
Date: 19 Dec 2006 09:19:46 -0800
Subject: Re: Bush "science"
Too many lousy works have been labelled as scientific. The
Administration should be
laudaded for setting standard.
Very often some loosers have been trying to pass their ideologies off
as Science, it is time
to stop those impostors. Bush should be laudaded
'Laudaded'?
Sure, ok.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Don Cates" |
|
| Title: Re: Bush "science" |
20 Dec 2006 12:29:42 PM |
|
|
On Tue, 19 Dec 2006 21:44:14 -0600, Tim McGaughy <teekem@ispwest.com>
posted:
From:
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Newsgroups: talk.origins,alt.atheism,alt.bible,alt.politics
Date: 19 Dec 2006 09:19:46 -0800
Subject: Re: Bush "science"
Too many lousy works have been labelled as scientific. The
Administration should be
laudaded for setting standard.
Very often some loosers have been trying to pass their ideologies off
as Science, it is time
to stop those impostors. Bush should be laudaded
'Laudaded'?
Sure, ok.
And 'loosers'? (anti-slavery activists, perhaps?)
--
Don Cates ("he's a cunning rascal" - PN)
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Free Lunch" |
|
| Title: Re: Bush "science" |
19 Dec 2006 09:48:16 PM |
|
|
On Tue, 19 Dec 2006 21:44:14 -0600, in talk.origins
Tim McGaughy <teekem@ispwest.com> wrote in
<C1AE0DAD.8AB8%teekem@ispwest.com>:
From:
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Newsgroups: talk.origins,alt.atheism,alt.bible,alt.politics
Date: 19 Dec 2006 09:19:46 -0800
Subject: Re: Bush "science"
Too many lousy works have been labelled as scientific. The
Administration should be
laudaded for setting standard.
Very often some loosers have been trying to pass their ideologies off
as Science, it is time
to stop those impostors. Bush should be laudaded
'Laudaded'?
Sure, ok.
I think that means that Bush should be taking really large does of
laudanum, but I may be wrong.
.
|
|
|
| User: "John Wilkins" |
|
| Title: Re: Bush "science" |
19 Dec 2006 09:57:49 PM |
|
|
Free Lunch <lunch@nofreelunch.us> wrote:
On Tue, 19 Dec 2006 21:44:14 -0600, in talk.origins
Tim McGaughy <teekem@ispwest.com> wrote in
<C1AE0DAD.8AB8%teekem@ispwest.com>:
From:
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Newsgroups: talk.origins,alt.atheism,alt.bible,alt.politics
Date: 19 Dec 2006 09:19:46 -0800
Subject: Re: Bush "science"
Too many lousy works have been labelled as scientific. The
Administration should be
laudaded for setting standard.
Very often some loosers have been trying to pass their ideologies off
as Science, it is time
to stop those impostors. Bush should be laudaded
'Laudaded'?
Sure, ok.
I think that means that Bush should be taking really large does of
laudanum, but I may be wrong.
He can't take does of anything, since it's the buck that stops at his
desk, not the doe.
--
John S. Wilkins, Postdoctoral Research Fellow, Biohumanities Project
University of Queensland - Blog: scienceblogs.com/evolvingthoughts
"He used... sarcasm. He knew all the tricks, dramatic irony, metaphor,
bathos, puns, parody, litotes and... satire. He was vicious."
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Bush "science" |
20 Dec 2006 08:30:27 AM |
|
|
John Wilkins wrote:
Free Lunch <lunch@nofreelunch.us> wrote:
On Tue, 19 Dec 2006 21:44:14 -0600, in talk.origins
Tim McGaughy <teekem@ispwest.com> wrote in
<C1AE0DAD.8AB8%teekem@ispwest.com>:
From:
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Newsgroups: talk.origins,alt.atheism,alt.bible,alt.politics
Date: 19 Dec 2006 09:19:46 -0800
Subject: Re: Bush "science"
Too many lousy works have been labelled as scientific. The
Administration should be
laudaded for setting standard.
Very often some loosers have been trying to pass their ideologies off
as Science, it is time
to stop those impostors. Bush should be laudaded
'Laudaded'?
Sure, ok.
I think that means that Bush should be taking really large does of
laudanum, but I may be wrong.
He can't take does of anything, since it's the buck that stops at his
desk, not the doe.
Not if ***** Cheney sees it first:
http://www.wonkette.com/politics/*****-cheney/cheneys-victim-still-rots-on-observatory-grounds-222867.php
or
http://masl.to/?N2272376E
Chris
--
John S. Wilkins, Postdoctoral Research Fellow, Biohumanities Project
University of Queensland - Blog: scienceblogs.com/evolvingthoughts
"He used... sarcasm. He knew all the tricks, dramatic irony, metaphor,
bathos, puns, parody, litotes and... satire. He was vicious."
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "CreateThis" |
|
| Title: Re: Bush "science" |
19 Dec 2006 11:28:39 AM |
|
|
On 19 Dec 2006 09:19:46 -0800, wrote:
Too many lousy works have been labelled as scientific. The
Administration should be
laudaded for setting standard.
Very often some loosers have been trying to pass their ideologies off
as Science, it is time
to stop those impostors. Bush should be laudaded
Do you mean he should be given *more* laudanum than he already is?
CT
.
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
