You know, you have posted the same thing several times now that both
fails to answer to any of the responses and also looks like an
unattributed quote from someone else.
A few points that may be useful.
I would argue that if one believes in the Judeo/Christian God,
fundamentalism only serves to confuse things. One can accept the Bible
as an inspired doccument without each and every verse having to be
noncontradictory. The idea that this collection of literature was
written directly by a divine being is clearly absurd. It was written by
many different humans over a period of time that encompassed many
historical eras, styles of writing and social attitudes. Even if you
believe in this God, it is obvious that the Bible is not the product
of a single individual.
Based on that, I would propose that proving a contradiction proves
nothing of particular import. It certainly does not prove or disprove
the existence of this God. The best you will be able to evaluate the
degree of scholarship of one person over another. Frankly, you might
just as well engage in a wrestling match and say that the winner of
that will prove or disprove the existence of God.