lein wrote:
Sangfroid wrote:
"Fenris" <howl@themoon.com> wrote in message
news:3WQVd.19087$VD5.8429@twister.socal.rr.com...
"Sam Bam" <sam@bam.slam> wrote in message
news:B0PVd.3988864$f47.715289@news.easynews.com...
UffDa! wrote:
The key is this: are ALL allowed?
no. the key is
IF a thing (like a monument to the ten commandments) has
secular/historical value, the fact that it ALSO has some sort of
religious reference/value is not enough to overwhelm the former
aspects
the question has to do with intent and result.
Actually, the question is why so many idiots think erecting a
monument is "passing a law".
So there are no permits, discretionary permits, required to erect monuments
on public property? Permits issued or denied under the law.
Were your born stupid, or did xtianity sap your intellect?
.
