On 1 Apr 2004 03:44:46 GMT, Xomicron <xomicron@wp.pl> wrote:
rfischer@bolt.sonic.net (Ray Fischer) wrote in
news:c44prj$a7k$1@bolt.sonic.net:
Xomicron <xomicron@wp.pl> wrote:
rfischer@bolt.sonic.net (Ray Fischer) wrote in message
news:<c43975$u4p$1@bolt.sonic.net>...
Xomicron <xomicron@wp.pl> wrote:
So you would agree that condemning all unsafe sex acts would be a
good idea?
Why only "unsafe" SEX acts? Why not ban all unsafe acts? Let's turn
the federal government into Bug Nanny.
When sex acts like homosexuality affect public health then they should
be banned.
Heterosexuality also spreads disease.
So does coughing, sneezing, shaking hands, kissing.
Deviant sex created an epidemic.
No, that is not true. Unsafe sex, both heterosexual and homosexual,
made people vulnerable to infection. That is why AIDS is
predominantly a heterosexual disease in Africa. One has to
arbitrarily ignore the actual statistics in a large part of the world
to come to the conclusion that AIDS is a homosexual disease.
Thomas P.
None of the Emperor's clothes had been so successful before.
"But he has got nothing on," said a little child.
.
