| Topic: |
Religions > Atheism |
| User: |
"= Vox Populi ©" |
| Date: |
02 Oct 2003 09:21:13 AM |
| Object: |
Re: Colo. Official: Jurors Answerable to God |
s_knight8 wrote:
http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&cid=519&ncid=519&e=8&u=/ap/20031001/ap_on_re_us/biblical_booklets
GOLDEN, Colo. - A county treasurer is handing out booklets to
potential jurors saying they are answerable "only to God almighty" and
not to the law when it comes to deliberations.
So they can just invent whatever the hell they want, eh?
Jefferson County Treasurer Mark Paschall, a former state lawmaker
known for his anti-abortion and pro-gun views, said the booklets are
"my personal gift to the people." He said the booklets, many stamped
with his name and elected title, were bought with $500 to $600 of his
money and that of two political allies who work in the treasurer's
office.
The 61-page booklets promote "jury nullification," a concept promoted
by conservative groups that say juries have the right to not only
decide guilt or innocence, but also whether laws are just
Of course they do, they always have. Only cowardly idiots would
vote for an unjust result simply because some fascist ***** judge
instructed them so ...
and adhere
to God's law.
Which god?
"You are above the law!" the booklet says. "As a juror in a trial
setting, when it comes to your individual vote of innocent or guilty,
you truly are answerable only to God almighty."
Said Paschall: "I want people to understand the form of government
that we have and the rights and freedoms that went before. If it
raises eyebrows, I think it perhaps ends up waking people up."
--
"We must respect the other fellow's religion,
but only in the sense and to the extent that
we respect his theory that his wife is beautiful
and his children smart."
- H.L. Mencken
.
|
|
| User: "Uncle Samuel stars@bars" |
|
| Title: Re: Colo. Official: Jurors Answerable to God |
03 Oct 2003 11:59:50 PM |
|
|
On Fri, 03 Oct 2003 23:18:31 GMT, BTR1701 <BTR1702@ix.netcom.com>
wrote:
In article <5crrnvk5v9t5dne672cch2fug4kt6di4fq@4ax.com>, Uncle Samuel
<stars@bars> wrote:
On Fri, 3 Oct 2003 11:42:35 -0600, "=> Vox Populi ©" <vox@popu.li>
wrote:
BTR1701 wrote:
In article <utSdnQ7fM4uYieCiRTvU2Q@giganews.com>, Uncle Samuel
<stars@bars> wrote:
BTR1701 wrote:
In article <jrfpnv05208gqrij5k7cbp6nm61lcqnom8@4ax.com>, Uncle
Samuel <stars@bars> wrote:
On Thu, 02 Oct 2003 22:39:42 GMT, BTR1701 <BTR1702@ix.netcom.com>
wrote:
In article <slgonvsbsj0g6j8au0lo9bcrn8965urh6s@4ax.com>, Uncle
Samuel <stars@bars> wrote:
On Thu, 2 Oct 2003 08:21:13 -0600, "=> Vox Populi ©"
<vox@popu.li> wrote:
and adhere to God's law.
Which god?
Nature's God.
And which god is that?
The God.
The God of our founding fathers.
And which god is that? What are its characteristics? Where is it?
In the DOI - read up!
Where in the Declaration does it describe this god's characteristics
and location? Please cite the relevant passage.
He can't - none of those were DOI cites.
Actually, I was asking YOU to provide the cite. I see you've failed to
do so yet again.
Enjoy!
When in the Course of human events, it becomes necessary for one
people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with
another, and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and
equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature's God entitle
them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they
should declare the causes which impel them to the separation.
We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created
equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable
Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of
Happiness.
.
|
|
|
| User: "BTR1701" |
|
| Title: Re: Colo. Official: Jurors Answerable to God |
04 Oct 2003 12:59:15 PM |
|
|
In article <cljsnvc8nohd0u8pgaaa9jd0hcs0i0siho@4ax.com>, Uncle Samuel
<stars@bars> wrote:
On Fri, 03 Oct 2003 23:18:31 GMT, BTR1701 <BTR1702@ix.netcom.com>
wrote:
In article <5crrnvk5v9t5dne672cch2fug4kt6di4fq@4ax.com>, Uncle Samuel
<stars@bars> wrote:
On Fri, 3 Oct 2003 11:42:35 -0600, "=> Vox Populi ©" <vox@popu.li>
wrote:
BTR1701 wrote:
In article <utSdnQ7fM4uYieCiRTvU2Q@giganews.com>, Uncle Samuel
<stars@bars> wrote:
BTR1701 wrote:
In article <jrfpnv05208gqrij5k7cbp6nm61lcqnom8@4ax.com>, Uncle
Samuel <stars@bars> wrote:
On Thu, 02 Oct 2003 22:39:42 GMT, BTR1701 <BTR1702@ix.netcom.com>
wrote:
In article <slgonvsbsj0g6j8au0lo9bcrn8965urh6s@4ax.com>, Uncle
Samuel <stars@bars> wrote:
On Thu, 2 Oct 2003 08:21:13 -0600, "=> Vox Populi ©"
<vox@popu.li> wrote:
and adhere to God's law.
Which god?
Nature's God.
And which god is that?
The God.
The God of our founding fathers.
And which god is that? What are its characteristics? Where is it?
In the DOI - read up!
Where in the Declaration does it describe this god's characteristics
and location? Please cite the relevant passage.
He can't - none of those were DOI cites.
Actually, I was asking YOU to provide the cite. I see you've failed to
do so yet again.
When in the Course of human events, it becomes necessary for one
people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with
another, and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and
equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature's God entitle
them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they
should declare the causes which impel them to the separation.
We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created
equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable
Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of
Happiness.
Where in that quote are this god's characteristics and location
described?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Uncle Samuel stars@bars" |
|
| Title: Re: Colo. Official: Jurors Answerable to God |
04 Oct 2003 02:17:23 PM |
|
|
On Sat, 04 Oct 2003 17:59:15 GMT, BTR1701 <BTR1702@ix.netcom.com>
wrote:
In article <cljsnvc8nohd0u8pgaaa9jd0hcs0i0siho@4ax.com>, Uncle Samuel
<stars@bars> wrote:
On Fri, 03 Oct 2003 23:18:31 GMT, BTR1701 <BTR1702@ix.netcom.com>
wrote:
In article <5crrnvk5v9t5dne672cch2fug4kt6di4fq@4ax.com>, Uncle Samuel
<stars@bars> wrote:
On Fri, 3 Oct 2003 11:42:35 -0600, "=> Vox Populi ©" <vox@popu.li>
wrote:
BTR1701 wrote:
In article <utSdnQ7fM4uYieCiRTvU2Q@giganews.com>, Uncle Samuel
<stars@bars> wrote:
BTR1701 wrote:
In article <jrfpnv05208gqrij5k7cbp6nm61lcqnom8@4ax.com>, Uncle
Samuel <stars@bars> wrote:
On Thu, 02 Oct 2003 22:39:42 GMT, BTR1701 <BTR1702@ix.netcom.com>
wrote:
In article <slgonvsbsj0g6j8au0lo9bcrn8965urh6s@4ax.com>, Uncle
Samuel <stars@bars> wrote:
On Thu, 2 Oct 2003 08:21:13 -0600, "=> Vox Populi ©"
<vox@popu.li> wrote:
and adhere to God's law.
Which god?
Nature's God.
And which god is that?
The God.
The God of our founding fathers.
And which god is that? What are its characteristics? Where is it?
In the DOI - read up!
Where in the Declaration does it describe this god's characteristics
and location? Please cite the relevant passage.
He can't - none of those were DOI cites.
Actually, I was asking YOU to provide the cite. I see you've failed to
do so yet again.
When in the Course of human events, it becomes necessary for one
people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with
another, and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and
equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature's God entitle
them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they
should declare the causes which impel them to the separation.
We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created
equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable
Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of
Happiness.
Where in that quote are this god's characteristics
....groan...you are dense...
"all men are createdequal, that they are endowed by their Creator with
certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the
pursuit ofHappiness."
That would take one pretty awesome Creator, doncha think...
and location described?
Certianly it wasn't Britain...
.
|
|
|
| User: "BTR1701" |
|
| Title: Re: Colo. Official: Jurors Answerable to God |
04 Oct 2003 04:26:37 PM |
|
|
In article <dg6unvgu5e5a8sjpttbmuiij0ac8itt0d5@4ax.com>, Uncle Samuel
<stars@bars> wrote:
On Sat, 04 Oct 2003 17:59:15 GMT, BTR1701 <BTR1702@ix.netcom.com>
wrote:
In article <cljsnvc8nohd0u8pgaaa9jd0hcs0i0siho@4ax.com>, Uncle Samuel
<stars@bars> wrote:
On Fri, 03 Oct 2003 23:18:31 GMT, BTR1701 <BTR1702@ix.netcom.com>
wrote:
In article <5crrnvk5v9t5dne672cch2fug4kt6di4fq@4ax.com>, Uncle Samuel
<stars@bars> wrote:
On Fri, 3 Oct 2003 11:42:35 -0600, "=> Vox Populi ©" <vox@popu.li>
wrote:
BTR1701 wrote:
In article <utSdnQ7fM4uYieCiRTvU2Q@giganews.com>, Uncle Samuel
<stars@bars> wrote:
BTR1701 wrote:
Where in the Declaration does it describe this god's
characteristics and location? Please cite the relevant passage.
He can't - none of those were DOI cites.
Actually, I was asking YOU to provide the cite. I see you've failed
to do so yet again.
When in the Course of human events, it becomes necessary for one
people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with
another, and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and
equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature's God entitle
them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they
should declare the causes which impel them to the separation.
We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created
equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable
Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of
Happiness.
Where in that quote are this god's characteristics
...groan...you are dense...
Behold the irony...
"all men are createdequal, that they are endowed by their Creator with
certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the
pursuit ofHappiness."
That would take one pretty awesome Creator, doncha think...
Irrelevant. Where in that quote are this god's characteristics described?
and location described?
Certianly it wasn't Britain...
Irrelevant. Telling me where it's not isn't telling me where it's
location is described.
And in any event, is it your assertion that this god does not exist in
Britain?
.
|
|
|
| User: "= Vox Populi ©" |
|
| Title: Re: Colo. Official: Jurors Answerable to God |
06 Oct 2003 06:57:10 PM |
|
|
BTR1701 wrote:
In article <dg6unvgu5e5a8sjpttbmuiij0ac8itt0d5@4ax.com>, Uncle Samuel
<stars@bars> wrote:
On Sat, 04 Oct 2003 17:59:15 GMT, BTR1701 <BTR1702@ix.netcom.com>
wrote:
In article <cljsnvc8nohd0u8pgaaa9jd0hcs0i0siho@4ax.com>, Uncle
Samuel <stars@bars> wrote:
On Fri, 03 Oct 2003 23:18:31 GMT, BTR1701 <BTR1702@ix.netcom.com>
wrote:
In article <5crrnvk5v9t5dne672cch2fug4kt6di4fq@4ax.com>, Uncle
Samuel <stars@bars> wrote:
On Fri, 3 Oct 2003 11:42:35 -0600, "=> Vox Populi ©"
<vox@popu.li> wrote:
BTR1701 wrote:
In article <utSdnQ7fM4uYieCiRTvU2Q@giganews.com>, Uncle Samuel
<stars@bars> wrote:
BTR1701 wrote:
Where in the Declaration does it describe this god's
characteristics and location? Please cite the relevant passage.
He can't - none of those were DOI cites.
Actually, I was asking YOU to provide the cite. I see you've
failed to do so yet again.
When in the Course of human events, it becomes necessary for one
people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them
with another, and to assume among the powers of the earth, the
separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of
Nature's God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of
mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel
them to the separation.
We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created
equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain
unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the
pursuit of Happiness.
Where in that quote are this god's characteristics
...groan...you are dense...
Behold the irony...
"all men are createdequal, that they are endowed by their Creator
with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty
and the pursuit ofHappiness."
That would take one pretty awesome Creator, doncha think...
Irrelevant. Where in that quote are this god's characteristics
described?
and location described?
Certianly it wasn't Britain...
Irrelevant. Telling me where it's not isn't telling me where it's
location is described.
And in any event, is it your assertion that this god does not exist in
Britain?
Not if it's name is Dionysus ...
--
"Imagine the people who believe such things
and who are not ashamed to ignore, totally,
all the patient findings of thinking minds through
all the centuries since the Bible was written.
And it is these ignorant people, the most uneducated,
the most unimaginative, the most unthinking among us,
who would make themselves the guides and leaders of
us all; who would force their feeble and childish beliefs
on us; who would invade our schools and libraries and
homes. I personally resent it bitterly..."
-- Isaac Asimov,
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Uncle Samuel stars@bars" |
|
| Title: Re: Colo. Official: Jurors Answerable to God |
03 Oct 2003 05:08:09 PM |
|
|
On Fri, 03 Oct 2003 17:25:33 GMT, BTR1701 <BTR1702@ix.netcom.com>
wrote:
In article <utSdnQ7fM4uYieCiRTvU2Q@giganews.com>, Uncle Samuel
<stars@bars> wrote:
BTR1701 wrote:
In article <jrfpnv05208gqrij5k7cbp6nm61lcqnom8@4ax.com>, Uncle Samuel
<stars@bars> wrote:
On Thu, 02 Oct 2003 22:39:42 GMT, BTR1701 <BTR1702@ix.netcom.com>
wrote:
In article <slgonvsbsj0g6j8au0lo9bcrn8965urh6s@4ax.com>, Uncle Samuel
<stars@bars> wrote:
On Thu, 2 Oct 2003 08:21:13 -0600, "=> Vox Populi ©" <vox@popu.li>
wrote:
and adhere to God's law.
Which god?
Nature's God.
And which god is that?
The God.
The God of our founding fathers.
And which god is that? What are its characteristics? Where is it?
In the DOI - read up!
Where in the Declaration does it describe this god's characteristics
The characteristics are denoted in this passage:
"all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator
with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty
and the pursuit of Happiness."
That is one characteristically awesome God doncha think?
and location?
None mentioned, but we can presume England wasn't implied...
.
|
|
|
| User: "BTR1701" |
|
| Title: Re: Colo. Official: Jurors Answerable to God |
03 Oct 2003 06:21:53 PM |
|
|
In article <25rrnvg4p8dlv1tf4hc7qc2v89d2n297rh@4ax.com>, Uncle Samuel
<stars@bars> wrote:
On Fri, 03 Oct 2003 17:25:33 GMT, BTR1701 <BTR1702@ix.netcom.com>
wrote:
In article <utSdnQ7fM4uYieCiRTvU2Q@giganews.com>, Uncle Samuel
<stars@bars> wrote:
BTR1701 wrote:
In article <jrfpnv05208gqrij5k7cbp6nm61lcqnom8@4ax.com>, Uncle
Samuel <stars@bars> wrote:
On Thu, 02 Oct 2003 22:39:42 GMT, BTR1701 <BTR1702@ix.netcom.com>
wrote:
In article <slgonvsbsj0g6j8au0lo9bcrn8965urh6s@4ax.com>, Uncle
Samuel <stars@bars> wrote:
On Thu, 2 Oct 2003 08:21:13 -0600, "=> Vox Populi ©" <vox@popu.li>
wrote:
and adhere to God's law.
Which god?
Nature's God.
And which god is that?
The God.
The God of our founding fathers.
And which god is that? What are its characteristics? Where is it?
In the DOI - read up!
Where in the Declaration does it describe this god's characteristics
The characteristics are denoted in this passage:
"all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator
with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty
and the pursuit of Happiness."
That is one characteristically awesome God doncha think?
Actually, that provides not even one characteristic of this supposed
god. It says what it did, not what it is.
Why don't you excuse yourself from Usenet for a few months, check a
basic English primer out of the library and learn how to comprehend
simple sentences. Then come back and discuss the issue intelligently.
and location?
None mentioned, but we can presume England wasn't implied..
So you have no idea where this thing even is? Interesting.
When I first asked where this supposed god is, you claimed it was in the
DOI and told me to read up. Now you say it's not mentioned.
Which is it? In which response were you lying?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Uncle Samuel stars@bars" |
|
| Title: Re: Colo. Official: Jurors Answerable to God |
03 Oct 2003 11:59:54 PM |
|
|
On Fri, 03 Oct 2003 23:21:53 GMT, BTR1701 <BTR1702@ix.netcom.com>
wrote:
In article <25rrnvg4p8dlv1tf4hc7qc2v89d2n297rh@4ax.com>, Uncle Samuel
<stars@bars> wrote:
On Fri, 03 Oct 2003 17:25:33 GMT, BTR1701 <BTR1702@ix.netcom.com>
wrote:
In article <utSdnQ7fM4uYieCiRTvU2Q@giganews.com>, Uncle Samuel
<stars@bars> wrote:
BTR1701 wrote:
In article <jrfpnv05208gqrij5k7cbp6nm61lcqnom8@4ax.com>, Uncle
Samuel <stars@bars> wrote:
On Thu, 02 Oct 2003 22:39:42 GMT, BTR1701 <BTR1702@ix.netcom.com>
wrote:
In article <slgonvsbsj0g6j8au0lo9bcrn8965urh6s@4ax.com>, Uncle
Samuel <stars@bars> wrote:
On Thu, 2 Oct 2003 08:21:13 -0600, "=> Vox Populi ©" <vox@popu.li>
wrote:
and adhere to God's law.
Which god?
Nature's God.
And which god is that?
The God.
The God of our founding fathers.
And which god is that? What are its characteristics? Where is it?
In the DOI - read up!
Where in the Declaration does it describe this god's characteristics
The characteristics are denoted in this passage:
"all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator
with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty
and the pursuit of Happiness."
That is one characteristically awesome God doncha think?
Actually, that provides not even one characteristic of this supposed
god. It says what it did, not what it is.
Oh...do not acts denote being?
After all, those were some noble gifts.
Might not even a simpleton such as you impute some dignity from these
intentions?
Oh go on...stretch yourself..
Why don't you excuse yourself from Usenet for a few months, check a
basic English primer out of the library and learn how to comprehend
simple sentences. Then come back and discuss the issue intelligently.
Why don't you pull yer puss filled head outta yer ***** and pray for
God's holy mercy.
and location?
None mentioned, but we can presume England wasn't implied..
So you have no idea where this thing even is?
Me?
I thought you were quizzing the founding fathers...changed horses mid
stream have you...putz!
Interesting.
You have ceased to be.
When I first asked where this supposed god is, you claimed it was in the
DOI and told me to read up.
He is and you should have.
Now you say it's not mentioned.
No, "Nature's God" is quite obvious moron.
Which is it?
When in the Course of human events, it becomes necessary for one
people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with
another, and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and
equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature's God entitle
them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they
should declare the causes which impel them to the separation.
We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created
equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable
Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of
Happiness.
In which response were you lying?
None.
why do you always seek to lie and obfuscate, you hateful atheistic
POS?
.
|
|
|
| User: "BTR1701" |
|
| Title: Re: Colo. Official: Jurors Answerable to God |
04 Oct 2003 12:58:25 PM |
|
|
In article <rmjsnv820vrd2cslsdmhpd4jlnlgftl645@4ax.com>, Uncle Samuel
<stars@bars> wrote:
On Fri, 03 Oct 2003 23:21:53 GMT, BTR1701 <BTR1702@ix.netcom.com>
wrote:
In article <25rrnvg4p8dlv1tf4hc7qc2v89d2n297rh@4ax.com>, Uncle Samuel
<stars@bars> wrote:
On Fri, 03 Oct 2003 17:25:33 GMT, BTR1701 <BTR1702@ix.netcom.com>
wrote:
In article <utSdnQ7fM4uYieCiRTvU2Q@giganews.com>, Uncle Samuel
<stars@bars> wrote:
BTR1701 wrote:
In article <jrfpnv05208gqrij5k7cbp6nm61lcqnom8@4ax.com>, Uncle
Samuel <stars@bars> wrote:
On Thu, 02 Oct 2003 22:39:42 GMT, BTR1701 <BTR1702@ix.netcom.com>
wrote:
In article <slgonvsbsj0g6j8au0lo9bcrn8965urh6s@4ax.com>, Uncle
Samuel <stars@bars> wrote:
On Thu, 2 Oct 2003 08:21:13 -0600, "=> Vox Populi ©"
<vox@popu.li>
wrote:
and adhere to God's law.
Which god?
Nature's God.
And which god is that?
The God.
The God of our founding fathers.
And which god is that? What are its characteristics? Where is it?
In the DOI - read up!
Where in the Declaration does it describe this god's characteristics
The characteristics are denoted in this passage:
"all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator
with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty
and the pursuit of Happiness."
That is one characteristically awesome God doncha think?
Actually, that provides not even one characteristic of this supposed
god. It says what it did, not what it is.
Oh...do not acts denote being?
Nope. Try again.
Why don't you excuse yourself from Usenet for a few months, check a
basic English primer out of the library and learn how to comprehend
simple sentences. Then come back and discuss the issue intelligently.
Why don't you pull yer puss filled head outta yer ***** and pray for
God's holy mercy.
Which god? And what prayer should I use?
and location?
None mentioned, but we can presume England wasn't implied..
So you have no idea where this thing even is?
Me?
I thought you were quizzing the founding fathers...changed horses mid
stream have you...putz!
Either one. You can either tell me where this god is or you can show me
where the founding fathers said it is.
But before you respond, keep in mind that you've already flip-flopped on
this issue. First you said the Declaration indicates where this god is
located. Then you said it's not in the Declaration.
You're already a liar at least once. Let's see if you can go for two.
When I first asked where this supposed god is, you claimed it was in the
DOI and told me to read up. Now you say it's not mentioned.
No, "Nature's God" is quite obvious moron.
Which is it? In which response were you lying?
None.
Maybe you didn't understand. I can see how simple English confuses you.
Here it is again and think long and hard.
When I first asked where this supposed god is, you claimed it was in the
DOI and told me to read up. Now you say it's not mentioned. Which is it?
In which response were you lying?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Uncle Samuel stars@bars" |
|
| Title: Re: Colo. Official: Jurors Answerable to God |
04 Oct 2003 02:17:26 PM |
|
|
On Sat, 04 Oct 2003 17:58:25 GMT, BTR1701 <BTR1702@ix.netcom.com>
wrote:
In article <rmjsnv820vrd2cslsdmhpd4jlnlgftl645@4ax.com>, Uncle Samuel
<stars@bars> wrote:
On Fri, 03 Oct 2003 23:21:53 GMT, BTR1701 <BTR1702@ix.netcom.com>
wrote:
In article <25rrnvg4p8dlv1tf4hc7qc2v89d2n297rh@4ax.com>, Uncle Samuel
<stars@bars> wrote:
On Fri, 03 Oct 2003 17:25:33 GMT, BTR1701 <BTR1702@ix.netcom.com>
wrote:
In article <utSdnQ7fM4uYieCiRTvU2Q@giganews.com>, Uncle Samuel
<stars@bars> wrote:
BTR1701 wrote:
In article <jrfpnv05208gqrij5k7cbp6nm61lcqnom8@4ax.com>, Uncle
Samuel <stars@bars> wrote:
On Thu, 02 Oct 2003 22:39:42 GMT, BTR1701 <BTR1702@ix.netcom.com>
wrote:
In article <slgonvsbsj0g6j8au0lo9bcrn8965urh6s@4ax.com>, Uncle
Samuel <stars@bars> wrote:
On Thu, 2 Oct 2003 08:21:13 -0600, "=> Vox Populi ©"
<vox@popu.li>
wrote:
and adhere to God's law.
Which god?
Nature's God.
And which god is that?
The God.
The God of our founding fathers.
And which god is that? What are its characteristics? Where is it?
In the DOI - read up!
Where in the Declaration does it describe this god's characteristics
The characteristics are denoted in this passage:
"all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator
with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty
and the pursuit of Happiness."
That is one characteristically awesome God doncha think?
Actually, that provides not even one characteristic of this supposed
god. It says what it did, not what it is.
Oh...do not acts denote being?
Nope.
Yes.
Try again.
No need to.
Why don't you excuse yourself from Usenet for a few months, check a
basic English primer out of the library and learn how to comprehend
simple sentences. Then come back and discuss the issue intelligently.
Why don't you pull yer puss filled head outta yer ***** and pray for
God's holy mercy.
Which god?
Nature's God.
And what prayer should I use?
A simple plea for forgiveness.
and location?
None mentioned, but we can presume England wasn't implied..
So you have no idea where this thing even is?
Me?
I thought you were quizzing the founding fathers...changed horses mid
stream have you...putz!
Either one. You can either tell me where this god is or you can show me
where the founding fathers said it is.
No need to, God is everywhere.
But before you respond, keep in mind that you've already flip-flopped on
this issue. First you said the Declaration indicates where this god is
located. Then you said it's not in the Declaration.
Nah, I never said it specified any location.
You're already a liar at least once. Let's see if you can go for two.
And you're a worthless heathen - yawn...
When I first asked where this supposed god is, you claimed it was in the
DOI and told me to read up. Now you say it's not mentioned.
No, "Nature's God" is quite obvious moron.
Which is it? In which response were you lying?
None.
Maybe you didn't understand.
Sure I did.
I can see how simple English confuses you.
I can see how you like to obfuscate and twist it.
Here it is again and think long and hard.
If it comes from you such effort would be a waste of time.
When I first asked where this supposed god is, you claimed it was in the
DOI and told me to read up.
I did and you should have.
Now you say it's not mentioned.
Nope, I said God is in the DOI - read back.
Which is it?
These lines:
" and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal
station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature's God entitle the"
"all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator
with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty
and the pursuit of Happiness."
In which response were you lying?
Neither.
.
|
|
|
| User: "BTR1701" |
|
| Title: Re: Colo. Official: Jurors Answerable to God |
04 Oct 2003 04:30:52 PM |
|
|
In article <kk6unv819smicj6slmhi9f7bnl3u7ag332@4ax.com>, Uncle Samuel
<stars@bars> wrote:
On Sat, 04 Oct 2003 17:58:25 GMT, BTR1701 <BTR1702@ix.netcom.com>
wrote:
In article <rmjsnv820vrd2cslsdmhpd4jlnlgftl645@4ax.com>, Uncle Samuel
<stars@bars> wrote:
On Fri, 03 Oct 2003 23:21:53 GMT, BTR1701 <BTR1702@ix.netcom.com>
I thought you were quizzing the founding fathers...changed horses mid
stream have you...putz!
Either one. You can either tell me where this god is or you can show me
where the founding fathers said it is.
No need to, God is everywhere.
So now it's everywhere, huh? I thought you said it wasn't in Britain?
I guess you got that third lie after all...
But before you respond, keep in mind that you've already flip-flopped on
this issue. First you said the Declaration indicates where this god is
located. Then you said it's not in the Declaration.
Nah, I never said it specified any location.
Sure you did. I asked where this god is located and you said it's in
the Declaration.
You're already a liar at least once. Let's see if you can go for two.
And you're a worthless heathen - yawn...
LOL! Yep, a heathen I am. And you can't do ***** about it. I bet that
really bug you, huh?
When I first asked where this supposed god is, you claimed it was in
the DOI and told me to read up. Now you say it's not mentioned.
No, "Nature's God" is quite obvious moron.
So god belongs to someone or something? I had no idea a god could be
possessed. Interesting.
When I first asked where this supposed god is, you claimed it was in the
DOI and told me to read up.
I did and you should have.
Now you say it's not mentioned.
Nope, I said God is in the DOI - read back.
Sure. I asked what are this god's characteristics and where is it
located?
You responded that it's in the DOI.
Then you later responded that there was no mention of location in th DOI.
One of you responses was a lie. QED.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Uncle Samuel stars@bars" |
|
| Title: Re: Colo. Official: Jurors Answerable to God |
04 Oct 2003 08:24:26 PM |
|
|
On Sat, 04 Oct 2003 21:30:52 GMT, BTR1701 <BTR1702@ix.netcom.com>
wrote:
In article <kk6unv819smicj6slmhi9f7bnl3u7ag332@4ax.com>, Uncle Samuel
<stars@bars> wrote:
On Sat, 04 Oct 2003 17:58:25 GMT, BTR1701 <BTR1702@ix.netcom.com>
wrote:
In article <rmjsnv820vrd2cslsdmhpd4jlnlgftl645@4ax.com>, Uncle Samuel
<stars@bars> wrote:
On Fri, 03 Oct 2003 23:21:53 GMT, BTR1701 <BTR1702@ix.netcom.com>
I thought you were quizzing the founding fathers...changed horses mid
stream have you...putz!
Either one. You can either tell me where this god is or you can show me
where the founding fathers said it is.
No need to, God is everywhere.
So now it's everywhere, huh?
Always has been.
I thought you said it wasn't in Britain?
At that time I suspect the perversion thereof was an apt notice to
those of faith.
I guess you got that third lie after all...
I see you haven't a clue.
But before you respond, keep in mind that you've already flip-flopped on
this issue. First you said the Declaration indicates where this god is
located. Then you said it's not in the Declaration.
Nah, I never said it specified any location.
Sure you did.
No I simply told you where to find a reference.
I asked where this god is located and you said it's in
the Declaration.
He is mentioned there with some fanfare.
You're already a liar at least once. Let's see if you can go for two.
And you're a worthless heathen - yawn...
LOL! Yep, a heathen I am. And you can't do ***** about it. I bet that
really bug you, huh?
Not a bit, except for your mouthy stupidity, but that is a
non-denominational usenet constant.
When I first asked where this supposed god is, you claimed it was in
the DOI and told me to read up. Now you say it's not mentioned.
No, "Nature's God" is quite obvious moron.
So god belongs to someone or something?
Does that specify ownership?
I had no idea a god could be
possessed. Interesting.
You can posses the spirit of God, if you choose to.
When I first asked where this supposed god is, you claimed it was in the
DOI and told me to read up.
I did and you should have.
Now you say it's not mentioned.
Nope, I said God is in the DOI - read back.
Sure. I asked what are this god's characteristics and where is it
located?
And I quoted relevant passages.
You responded that it's in the DOI.
God has first order notation there, no question.
Then you later responded that there was no mention of location in th DOI.
No, none is necessary.
One of you responses was a lie.
Which One?
QED.
POS.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "= Vox Populi ©" |
|
| Title: Re: Colo. Official: Jurors Answerable to God |
06 Oct 2003 07:09:45 PM |
|
|
Uncle Samuel wrote:
On Fri, 03 Oct 2003 23:21:53 GMT, BTR1701 <BTR1702@ix.netcom.com>
wrote:
In article <25rrnvg4p8dlv1tf4hc7qc2v89d2n297rh@4ax.com>, Uncle Samuel
<stars@bars> wrote:
On Fri, 03 Oct 2003 17:25:33 GMT, BTR1701 <BTR1702@ix.netcom.com>
wrote:
In article <utSdnQ7fM4uYieCiRTvU2Q@giganews.com>, Uncle Samuel
<stars@bars> wrote:
BTR1701 wrote:
In article <jrfpnv05208gqrij5k7cbp6nm61lcqnom8@4ax.com>, Uncle
Samuel <stars@bars> wrote:
On Thu, 02 Oct 2003 22:39:42 GMT, BTR1701
<BTR1702@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
In article <slgonvsbsj0g6j8au0lo9bcrn8965urh6s@4ax.com>, Uncle
Samuel <stars@bars> wrote:
On Thu, 2 Oct 2003 08:21:13 -0600, "=> Vox Populi ©"
<vox@popu.li> wrote:
and adhere to God's law.
Which god?
Nature's God.
And which god is that?
The God.
The God of our founding fathers.
And which god is that? What are its characteristics? Where is it?
In the DOI - read up!
Where in the Declaration does it describe this god's
characteristics
The characteristics are denoted in this passage:
"all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator
with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty
and the pursuit of Happiness."
That is one characteristically awesome God doncha think?
Actually, that provides not even one characteristic of this supposed
god. It says what it did, not what it is.
Oh...do not acts denote being?
SpongeBob acts you stammering chimpanzee ...
After all, those were some noble gifts.
Might not even a simpleton such as you impute some dignity from these
intentions?
Oh go on...stretch yourself..
Why don't you excuse yourself from Usenet for a few months, check a
basic English primer out of the library and learn how to comprehend
simple sentences. Then come back and discuss the issue intelligently.
Why don't you pull yer puss filled head outta yer ***** and pray for
God's holy mercy.
Which god you obsequious chanker sore ...?
and location?
None mentioned, but we can presume England wasn't implied..
So you have no idea where this thing even is?
Me?
I thought you were quizzing the founding fathers...changed horses mid
stream have you...putz!
Interesting.
You have ceased to be.
When I first asked where this supposed god is, you claimed it was in
the DOI and told me to read up.
He is and you should have.
So god is male? ... and what does god do with it's penis ...? Same as you
wanker...?
Now you say it's not mentioned.
No, "Nature's God" is quite obvious moron.
As opposed to all the other gods, or any "The God" eh, you slobbering
meatpuppet?
Which is it?
When in the Course of human events, it becomes necessary for one
people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with
another, and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and
equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature's God
Nothing about "The God" there ... and the need to use the adjective "Nature's"
ipso facto predicates the existance of other "gods" ...
We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created
equal, that they are endowed by their Creator
"their Creator" as differed from "The Creator" ... and nothing there
claiming that "their creator" is the same entity/concept as "Nature's God" ...
with certain unalienable
Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of
Happiness.
Yet this grotesque perverted "god" of yours created death and disease,
millenea of human enslavement, and pain and suffering... what a sick fucking
pervert you
are to worship such a vile, repugnant fabrication....
In which response were you lying?
Spammy always lies ... he's a lying fundie ...
--
--
"He who joyfully marches to music in rank and file has already
earned my contempt. He has been given a large brain by mistake,
since for him the spinal cord would fully suffice. This disgrace to
civilization should be done away with at once. Heroism at command,
senseless brutality, deplorable love-of-country stance, how violently
I hate all this, how despicable and ignoble war is; I would rather be
torn to shreds than be a part of so base an action! It is my conviction
that killing under the cloak of war is nothing but an act of murder."
-- Albert Einstein
.
|
|
|
| User: "Uncle Samuel stars@bars" |
|
| Title: Re: Colo. Official: Jurors Answerable to God |
07 Oct 2003 01:12:01 AM |
|
|
On Mon, 6 Oct 2003 18:09:45 -0600, "=> Vox Populi ©" <vox@popu.li>
wrote:
Uncle Samuel wrote:
On Fri, 03 Oct 2003 23:21:53 GMT, BTR1701 <BTR1702@ix.netcom.com>
wrote:
In article <25rrnvg4p8dlv1tf4hc7qc2v89d2n297rh@4ax.com>, Uncle Samuel
<stars@bars> wrote:
On Fri, 03 Oct 2003 17:25:33 GMT, BTR1701 <BTR1702@ix.netcom.com>
wrote:
In article <utSdnQ7fM4uYieCiRTvU2Q@giganews.com>, Uncle Samuel
<stars@bars> wrote:
BTR1701 wrote:
In article <jrfpnv05208gqrij5k7cbp6nm61lcqnom8@4ax.com>, Uncle
Samuel <stars@bars> wrote:
On Thu, 02 Oct 2003 22:39:42 GMT, BTR1701
<BTR1702@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
In article <slgonvsbsj0g6j8au0lo9bcrn8965urh6s@4ax.com>, Uncle
Samuel <stars@bars> wrote:
On Thu, 2 Oct 2003 08:21:13 -0600, "=> Vox Populi ©"
<vox@popu.li> wrote:
and adhere to God's law.
Which god?
Nature's God.
And which god is that?
The God.
The God of our founding fathers.
And which god is that? What are its characteristics? Where is it?
In the DOI - read up!
Where in the Declaration does it describe this god's
characteristics
The characteristics are denoted in this passage:
"all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator
with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty
and the pursuit of Happiness."
That is one characteristically awesome God doncha think?
Actually, that provides not even one characteristic of this supposed
god. It says what it did, not what it is.
Oh...do not acts denote being?
SpongeBob acts you stammering chimpanzee ...
....as an alias...
After all, those were some noble gifts.
Might not even a simpleton such as you impute some dignity from these
intentions?
Oh go on...stretch yourself..
Why don't you excuse yourself from Usenet for a few months, check a
basic English primer out of the library and learn how to comprehend
simple sentences. Then come back and discuss the issue intelligently.
Why don't you pull yer puss filled head outta yer ***** and pray for
God's holy mercy.
Which god you obsequious chanker sore ...?
THE god, you mewling mutton-brain.
and location?
None mentioned, but we can presume England wasn't implied..
So you have no idea where this thing even is?
Me?
I thought you were quizzing the founding fathers...changed horses mid
stream have you...putz!
Interesting.
You have ceased to be.
When I first asked where this supposed god is, you claimed it was in
the DOI and told me to read up.
He is and you should have.
So god is male? ...
God is referred to as He.
and what does god do with it's penis ...?
God exists beyond the physical.
Same as you wanker...?
Highly unlikely as God exists beyond the physical.
Now you say it's not mentioned.
No, "Nature's God" is quite obvious moron.
As opposed to all the other gods,
False Gods...yes.
or any "The God" eh, you slobbering
meatpuppet?
There is but one Creator.
Which is it?
When in the Course of human events, it becomes necessary for one
people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with
another, and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and
equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature's God
Nothing about "The God" there ... and the need to use the adjective "Nature's"
ipso facto predicates the existance of other "gods" ...
Of course it doesn't - all in the physical realm is a part of nature,
man included.
We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created
equal, that they are endowed by their Creator
"their Creator" as differed from "The Creator" ...
Yes it obviously is a grammatically proper modifier in this instance.
and nothing there
claiming that "their creator" is the same entity/concept as "Nature's God" ...
Ipso facto.
For clarification see:
The Holy Bible
with certain unalienable
Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of
Happiness.
Yet this grotesque perverted "god" of yours created death and disease,
millenea of human enslavement, and pain and suffering... what a sick fucking
pervert you
are to worship such a vile, repugnant fabrication....
There is eternal life for those of faith, and there are lessons from
both the sweet and the sour in life to be learned.
In which response were you lying?
Spammy always lies ... he's a lying fundie ...
Poxie, I'm getting very concerned for your soul...
.
|
|
|
| User: "= Vox Populi ©" |
|
| Title: Re: Colo. Official: Jurors Answerable to God |
07 Oct 2003 09:30:45 AM |
|
|
Uncle Samuel wrote:
On Mon, 6 Oct 2003 18:09:45 -0600, "=> Vox Populi ©" <vox@popu.li>
wrote:
Uncle Samuel wrote:
On Fri, 03 Oct 2003 23:21:53 GMT, BTR1701 <BTR1702@ix.netcom.com>
wrote:
In article <25rrnvg4p8dlv1tf4hc7qc2v89d2n297rh@4ax.com>, Uncle
Samuel <stars@bars> wrote:
On Fri, 03 Oct 2003 17:25:33 GMT, BTR1701 <BTR1702@ix.netcom.com>
wrote:
In article <utSdnQ7fM4uYieCiRTvU2Q@giganews.com>, Uncle Samuel
<stars@bars> wrote:
BTR1701 wrote:
In article <jrfpnv05208gqrij5k7cbp6nm61lcqnom8@4ax.com>, Uncle
Samuel <stars@bars> wrote:
On Thu, 02 Oct 2003 22:39:42 GMT, BTR1701
<BTR1702@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
In article <slgonvsbsj0g6j8au0lo9bcrn8965urh6s@4ax.com>,
Uncle Samuel <stars@bars> wrote:
On Thu, 2 Oct 2003 08:21:13 -0600, "=> Vox Populi ©"
<vox@popu.li> wrote:
and adhere to God's law.
Which god?
Nature's God.
And which god is that?
The God.
The God of our founding fathers.
And which god is that? What are its characteristics? Where is
it?
In the DOI - read up!
Where in the Declaration does it describe this god's
characteristics
The characteristics are denoted in this passage:
"all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator
with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life,
Liberty
and the pursuit of Happiness."
That is one characteristically awesome God doncha think?
Actually, that provides not even one characteristic of this
supposed
god. It says what it did, not what it is.
Oh...do not acts denote being?
SpongeBob acts you stammering chimpanzee ...
...as an alias...
After all, those were some noble gifts.
Might not even a simpleton such as you impute some dignity from
these intentions?
Oh go on...stretch yourself..
Why don't you excuse yourself from Usenet for a few months, check a
basic English primer out of the library and learn how to comprehend
simple sentences. Then come back and discuss the issue
intelligently.
Why don't you pull yer puss filled head outta yer ***** and pray for
God's holy mercy.
Which god you obsequious chanker sore ...?
THE god, you mewling mutton-brain.
Wrong again you slobbering sycophant ...
nothing about "The" god in the DOI.
and location?
None mentioned, but we can presume England wasn't implied..
So you have no idea where this thing even is?
Me?
I thought you were quizzing the founding fathers...changed horses
mid stream have you...putz!
Interesting.
You have ceased to be.
When I first asked where this supposed god is, you claimed it was
in
the DOI and told me to read up.
He is and you should have.
So god is male? ...
God is referred to as He.
Is it or isn't it...?
and what does god do with it's penis ...?
God exists beyond the physical.
Same as you wanker...?
Highly unlikely as God exists beyond the physical.
So man wasn't made in god's image then, eh liar?
Now you say it's not mentioned.
No, "Nature's God" is quite obvious moron.
As opposed to all the other gods,
False Gods...yes.
False to whom? The other gods? Even the judeo/xtian
god fabrication admits there are other gods.
or any "The God" eh, you slobbering
meatpuppet?
There is but one Creator.
And where does it say that you braying jackass?
Which is it?
When in the Course of human events, it becomes necessary for one
people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them
with another, and to assume among the powers of the earth, the
separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of
Nature's God
Nothing about "The God" there ... and the need to use the adjective
"Nature's" ipso facto predicates the existance of other "gods" ...
Of course it doesn't - all in the physical realm is a part of nature,
man included.
Still nothing about "The God" in the DOI, just one of the lesser gods,
the god of nature, a decidedly Pagan deity.
We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created
equal, that they are endowed by their Creator
"their Creator" as differed from "The Creator" ...
Yes it obviously is a grammatically proper modifier in this instance.
Nothing "obvious" about your twisted and perverted fantasmas ...except
perhaps the profound mental illness from which you suffer.
and nothing there
claiming that "their creator" is the same entity/concept as
"Nature's God" ...
Ipso facto.
Wrong again you turdcake eating bleater ...
For clarification see:
The Holy Bible
This Babble ...?
--
Ezekiel 4:12
And thou shalt eat it as barley cakes, and thou shalt bake it with dung that
cometh out of man, in their sight.
4:13
And the LORD said, Even thus shall the children of Israel eat their defiled
bread among the Gentiles, whither I will drive them.
4:15
Then he said unto me, Lo, I have given thee cow's dung for man's dung, and thou
shalt prepare thy bread therewith.
2 Kings, 18:27:
Hath he not sent me to the men which sit on the wall, that they may
eat their own dung, and drink their own ***** with you?
with certain unalienable
Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of
Happiness.
Yet this grotesque perverted "god" of yours created death and
disease, millenea of human enslavement, and pain and suffering...
what a sick fucking pervert you
are to worship such a vile, repugnant fabrication....
There is eternal life for those of faith,
Complete *****, and zero evidence to support it.
and there are lessons from
both the sweet and the sour in life to be learned.
That religion is a disease.
In which response were you lying?
Spammy always lies ... he's a lying fundie ...
Poxie, I'm getting very concerned for your soul...
Be more concerned with your own mind, you stammering psychotic.
--
"It was, of course, a lie what you read about my religious convictions, a
lie which is being systematically repeated. I do not believe in a personal
God and I have never denied this but have expressed it clearly. If something
is in me which can be called religious then it is the unbounded admiration
for the structure of the world so far as our science can reveal it."
[Albert Einstein, 1954, from "Albert Einstein: The Human Side", edited by
Helen Dukas and Banesh Hoffman, Princeton University Press]
.
|
|
|
| User: "Uncle Samuel stars@bars" |
|
| Title: Re: Colo. Official: Jurors Answerable to God |
07 Oct 2003 11:04:57 AM |
|
|
On Tue, 7 Oct 2003 08:30:45 -0600, "=> Vox Populi ©" <vox@popu.li>
wrote:
Uncle Samuel wrote:
On Mon, 6 Oct 2003 18:09:45 -0600, "=> Vox Populi ©" <vox@popu.li>
wrote:
Uncle Samuel wrote:
On Fri, 03 Oct 2003 23:21:53 GMT, BTR1701 <BTR1702@ix.netcom.com>
wrote:
In article <25rrnvg4p8dlv1tf4hc7qc2v89d2n297rh@4ax.com>, Uncle
Samuel <stars@bars> wrote:
On Fri, 03 Oct 2003 17:25:33 GMT, BTR1701 <BTR1702@ix.netcom.com>
wrote:
In article <utSdnQ7fM4uYieCiRTvU2Q@giganews.com>, Uncle Samuel
<stars@bars> wrote:
BTR1701 wrote:
In article <jrfpnv05208gqrij5k7cbp6nm61lcqnom8@4ax.com>, Uncle
Samuel <stars@bars> wrote:
On Thu, 02 Oct 2003 22:39:42 GMT, BTR1701
<BTR1702@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
In article <slgonvsbsj0g6j8au0lo9bcrn8965urh6s@4ax.com>,
Uncle Samuel <stars@bars> wrote:
On Thu, 2 Oct 2003 08:21:13 -0600, "=> Vox Populi ©"
<vox@popu.li> wrote:
and adhere to God's law.
Which god?
Nature's God.
And which god is that?
The God.
The God of our founding fathers.
And which god is that? What are its characteristics? Where is
it?
In the DOI - read up!
Where in the Declaration does it describe this god's
characteristics
The characteristics are denoted in this passage:
"all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator
with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life,
Liberty
and the pursuit of Happiness."
That is one characteristically awesome God doncha think?
Actually, that provides not even one characteristic of this
supposed
god. It says what it did, not what it is.
Oh...do not acts denote being?
SpongeBob acts you stammering chimpanzee ...
...as an alias...
After all, those were some noble gifts.
Might not even a simpleton such as you impute some dignity from
these intentions?
Oh go on...stretch yourself..
Why don't you excuse yourself from Usenet for a few months, check a
basic English primer out of the library and learn how to comprehend
simple sentences. Then come back and discuss the issue
intelligently.
Why don't you pull yer puss filled head outta yer ***** and pray for
God's holy mercy.
Which god you obsequious chanker sore ...?
THE god, you mewling mutton-brain.
Wrong again you slobbering sycophant ...
nothing about "The" god in the DOI.
Plenty about "Nature's God" which as we all know is The God.
and location?
None mentioned, but we can presume England wasn't implied..
So you have no idea where this thing even is?
Me?
I thought you were quizzing the founding fathers...changed horses
mid stream have you...putz!
Interesting.
You have ceased to be.
When I first asked where this supposed god is, you claimed it was
in
the DOI and told me to read up.
He is and you should have.
So god is male? ...
God is referred to as He.
Is it or isn't it...?
Referred to as He.
and what does god do with it's penis ...?
God exists beyond the physical.
Same as you wanker...?
Highly unlikely as God exists beyond the physical.
So man wasn't made in god's image then, eh liar?
Image and the difference between the physical and etheric is the rub.
Now you say it's not mentioned.
No, "Nature's God" is quite obvious moron.
As opposed to all the other gods,
False Gods...yes.
False to whom?
Greeks, Romans, satanist...
The other gods? Even the judeo/xtian
god fabrication admits there are other gods.
False ones made of man.
or any "The God" eh, you slobbering
meatpuppet?
There is but one Creator.
And where does it say that you braying jackass?
The Holy Bible.
Which is it?
When in the Course of human events, it becomes necessary for one
people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them
with another, and to assume among the powers of the earth, the
separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of
Nature's God
Nothing about "The God" there ... and the need to use the adjective
"Nature's" ipso facto predicates the existance of other "gods" ...
Of course it doesn't - all in the physical realm is a part of nature,
man included.
Still nothing about "The God" in the DOI, just one of the lesser gods,
the god of nature, a decidedly Pagan deity.
There is only one God - man is a part of nature, Nature's God is man's
God.
We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created
equal, that they are endowed by their Creator
"their Creator" as differed from "The Creator" ...
Yes it obviously is a grammatically proper modifier in this instance.
Nothing "obvious" about your twisted and perverted fantasmas ...except
perhaps the profound mental illness from which you suffer.
You lost that point in a hurry. Next.
and nothing there
claiming that "their creator" is the same entity/concept as
"Nature's God" ...
Ipso facto.
Wrong again you turdcake eating bleater ...
You lost another.
For clarification see:
The Holy Bible
This Babble ...?
The King James edition to be precise.
--
Ezekiel 4:12
And thou shalt eat it as barley cakes, and thou shalt bake it with dung that
cometh out of man, in their sight.
4:13
And the LORD said, Even thus shall the children of Israel eat their defiled
bread among the Gentiles, whither I will drive them.
4:15
Then he said unto me, Lo, I have given thee cow's dung for man's dung, and thou
shalt prepare thy bread therewith.
2 Kings, 18:27:
Hath he not sent me to the men which sit on the wall, that they may
eat their own dung, and drink their own ***** with you?
with certain unalienable
Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of
Happiness.
Yet this grotesque perverted "god" of yours created death and
disease, millenea of human enslavement, and pain and suffering...
what a sick fucking pervert you
are to worship such a vile, repugnant fabrication....
There is eternal life for those of faith,
Complete *****, and zero evidence to support it.
Well accepted premise and reams of writing to endorse it.
and there are lessons from
both the sweet and the sour in life to be learned.
That religion is a disease.
That the misuse of such can be.
In which response were you lying?
Spammy always lies ... he's a lying fundie ...
Poxie, I'm getting very concerned for your soul...
Be more concerned with your own mind, you stammering psychotic.
No, I'll restate my concern for your soul.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "= Vox Populi ©" |
|
| Title: Re: Colo. Official: Jurors Answerable to God |
06 Oct 2003 06:59:32 PM |
|
|
Uncle Samuel wrote:
On Fri, 03 Oct 2003 17:25:33 GMT, BTR1701 <BTR1702@ix.netcom.com>
wrote:
In article <utSdnQ7fM4uYieCiRTvU2Q@giganews.com>, Uncle Samuel
<stars@bars> wrote:
BTR1701 wrote:
In article <jrfpnv05208gqrij5k7cbp6nm61lcqnom8@4ax.com>, Uncle
Samuel <stars@bars> wrote:
On Thu, 02 Oct 2003 22:39:42 GMT, BTR1701 <BTR1702@ix.netcom.com>
wrote:
In article <slgonvsbsj0g6j8au0lo9bcrn8965urh6s@4ax.com>, Uncle
Samuel <stars@bars> wrote:
On Thu, 2 Oct 2003 08:21:13 -0600, "=> Vox Populi ©"
<vox@popu.li> wrote:
and adhere to God's law.
Which god?
Nature's God.
And which god is that?
The God.
The God of our founding fathers.
And which god is that? What are its characteristics? Where is it?
In the DOI - read up!
Where in the Declaration does it describe this god's characteristics
The characteristics are denoted in this passage:
"all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator
with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty
and the pursuit of Happiness."
That is one characteristically awesome God doncha think?
Nothing in the DOI claiming that "their Creator" or any "creator" is
a god ... much less "The God" you ignorant shitsniffer.
and location?
None mentioned, but we can presume England wasn't implied...
So god was a geographic imbecile like you ...?
--
"Naturally, the common people don't want war;
neither in Russia nor in England nor in America,
nor for that matter in Germany.
That is understood. But, after all, it is the leaders
of the country who determine the policy and
it is always a simple matter to drag the people
along, whether it is a democracy or a fascist
dictatorship or a Parliament or a Communist
dictatorship. Voice or no voice, the people can
always be brought to the bidding of the leaders.
That is easy. All you have to do is tell them
they are being attacked and denounce the
pacifists for lack of patriotism and exposing
the country to danger. It works the same way
in any country."
- Hermann Goering, Nazi Reichsmarshall
.
|
|
|
| User: "Uncle Samuel stars@bars" |
|
| Title: Re: Colo. Official: Jurors Answerable to God |
07 Oct 2003 01:12:05 AM |
|
|
On Mon, 6 Oct 2003 17:59:32 -0600, "=> Vox Populi ©" <vox@popu.li>
wrote:
Uncle Samuel wrote:
On Fri, 03 Oct 2003 17:25:33 GMT, BTR1701 <BTR1702@ix.netcom.com>
wrote:
In article <utSdnQ7fM4uYieCiRTvU2Q@giganews.com>, Uncle Samuel
<stars@bars> wrote:
BTR1701 wrote:
In article <jrfpnv05208gqrij5k7cbp6nm61lcqnom8@4ax.com>, Uncle
Samuel <stars@bars> wrote:
On Thu, 02 Oct 2003 22:39:42 GMT, BTR1701 <BTR1702@ix.netcom.com>
wrote:
In article <slgonvsbsj0g6j8au0lo9bcrn8965urh6s@4ax.com>, Uncle
Samuel <stars@bars> wrote:
On Thu, 2 Oct 2003 08:21:13 -0600, "=> Vox Populi ©"
<vox@popu.li> wrote:
and adhere to God's law.
Which god?
Nature's God.
And which god is that?
The God.
The God of our founding fathers.
And which god is that? What are its characteristics? Where is it?
In the DOI - read up!
Where in the Declaration does it describe this god's characteristics
The characteristics are denoted in this passage:
"all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator
with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty
and the pursuit of Happiness."
That is one characteristically awesome God doncha think?
Nothing in the DOI claiming that "their Creator" or any "creator" is
a god ... much less "The God" you ignorant shitsniffer.
Ipso facto.
God = Nature's God = the Creator.
and location?
None mentioned, but we can presume England wasn't implied...
So god was a geographic imbecile like you ...?
Well we were in the act of a geo-political divorce at the time. It's
not a terrible reach to think that the founding father's might have
wondered if God was of any import to the tyrants in England.
.
|
|
|
| User: "= Vox Populi ©" |
|
| Title: Re: Colo. Official: Jurors Answerable to God |
07 Oct 2003 09:33:00 AM |
|
|
Uncle Samuel wrote:
On Mon, 6 Oct 2003 17:59:32 -0600, "=> Vox Populi ©" <vox@popu.li>
wrote:
Uncle Samuel wrote:
On Fri, 03 Oct 2003 17:25:33 GMT, BTR1701 <BTR1702@ix.netcom.com>
wrote:
In article <utSdnQ7fM4uYieCiRTvU2Q@giganews.com>, Uncle Samuel
<stars@bars> wrote:
BTR1701 wrote:
In article <jrfpnv05208gqrij5k7cbp6nm61lcqnom8@4ax.com>, Uncle
Samuel <stars@bars> wrote:
On Thu, 02 Oct 2003 22:39:42 GMT, BTR1701
<BTR1702@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
In article <slgonvsbsj0g6j8au0lo9bcrn8965urh6s@4ax.com>, Uncle
Samuel <stars@bars> wrote:
On Thu, 2 Oct 2003 08:21:13 -0600, "=> Vox Populi ©"
<vox@popu.li> wrote:
and adhere to God's law.
Which god?
Nature's God.
And which god is that?
The God.
The God of our founding fathers.
And which god is that? What are its characteristics? Where is it?
In the DOI - read up!
Where in the Declaration does it describe this god's
characteristics
The characteristics are denoted in this passage:
"all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator
with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty
and the pursuit of Happiness."
That is one characteristically awesome God doncha think?
Nothing in the DOI claiming that "their Creator" or any "creator" is
a god ... much less "The God" you ignorant shitsniffer.
Ipso facto.
God = Nature's God = the Creator = lies = ***** = morons and imbeciles
who beleive in it.
Ipso facto.
and location?
None mentioned, but we can presume England wasn't implied...
So god was a geographic imbecile like you ...?
Well we were in the act of a geo-political divorce at the time. It's
not a terrible reach to think that the founding father's might have
wondered if God was of any import to the tyrants in England.
So they fabricated and perverted the actual characteristics and
definition of "god" ... eh?
--
JOHN ADAMS: "This would be the best of all possible worlds,
if there were no religions in it."
JOHN ADAMS: Letters to F.A. Van Der Kamp 1809-1816. "How has it
happened that millions of myths, fables, legends and tales have been
blended with Jewish and Christian fables and myths and have made them
the most bloody religion that has ever existed? Filled with the sordid
and detestable purposes of superstition and fraud?"
THOMAS JEFFERSON: Notes on Religion, passed in the Assembly of
Virginia, in the Year, 1786. "Millions of innocent men, women and
children, since the introduction of Christianity, have been burnt,
tortured, fined, and imprisoned. What has been the effect of this
coercion? To make one-half the world fools and the other half
hypocrites. To support roguery and error all over the earth."
THOMAS JEFFERSON: Letter to Thomas Whittemore, June 5, 1822:
"Christian creeds and doctrines, the clergy's own fatal inventions,
through all the ages has made of Christendom a slaughterhouse,
and divided it into sects of inextinguishable hatred for one another."
JAMES MADISON: "The purpose of separation of church and state is to keep
forever from these shores the ceaseless strife that has soaked the soil
of Europe with blood for centuries."
GEORGE WASHINGTON--Treaty of Tripoli 1796: The government of the United
States not, in any sense, founded on the Christian religion.
.
|
|
|
| User: "joe Bob" |
|
| Title: Re: Colo. Official: Jurors Answerable to God |
07 Oct 2003 11:00:38 AM |
|
|
All of your jihadi holy-warrior infighting is making my vagina hurt.
Suffice it to say, God is a turnip. Worship it and begone.
=> Vox Populi © wrote:
Uncle Samuel wrote:
On Mon, 6 Oct 2003 17:59:32 -0600, "=> Vox Populi ©" <vox@popu.li>
wrote:
Uncle Samuel wrote:
On Fri, 03 Oct 2003 17:25:33 GMT, BTR1701 <BTR1702@ix.netcom.com>
wrote:
In article <utSdnQ7fM4uYieCiRTvU2Q@giganews.com>, Uncle Samuel
<stars@bars> wrote:
BTR1701 wrote:
In article <jrfpnv05208gqrij5k7cbp6nm61lcqnom8@4ax.com>, Uncle
Samuel <stars@bars> wrote:
On Thu, 02 Oct 2003 22:39:42 GMT, BTR1701
<BTR1702@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
In article <slgonvsbsj0g6j8au0lo9bcrn8965urh6s@4ax.com>, Uncle
Samuel <stars@bars> wrote:
On Thu, 2 Oct 2003 08:21:13 -0600, "=> Vox Populi ©"
<vox@popu.li> wrote:
and adhere to God's law.
Which god?
Nature's God.
And which god is that?
The God.
The God of our founding fathers.
And which god is that? What are its characteristics? Where is it?
In the DOI - read up!
Where in the Declaration does it describe this god's
characteristics
The characteristics are denoted in this passage:
"all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator
with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty
and the pursuit of Happiness."
That is one characteristically awesome God doncha think?
Nothing in the DOI claiming that "their Creator" or any "creator" is
a god ... much less "The God" you ignorant shitsniffer.
Ipso facto.
God = Nature's God = the Creator = lies = ***** = morons and imbeciles
who beleive in it.
Ipso facto.
and location?
None mentioned, but we can presume England wasn't implied...
So god was a geographic imbecile like you ...?
Well we were in the act of a geo-political divorce at the time. It's
not a terrible reach to think that the founding father's might have
wondered if God was of any import to the tyrants in England.
So they fabricated and perverted the actual characteristics and
definition of "god" ... eh?
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Uncle Samuel stars@bars" |
|
| Title: Re: Colo. Official: Jurors Answerable to God |
07 Oct 2003 11:05:06 AM |
|
|
On Tue, 7 Oct 2003 08:33:00 -0600, "=> Vox Populi ©" <vox@popu.li>
wrote:
Uncle Samuel wrote:
On Mon, 6 Oct 2003 17:59:32 -0600, "=> Vox Populi ©" <vox@popu.li>
wrote:
Uncle Samuel wrote:
On Fri, 03 Oct 2003 17:25:33 GMT, BTR1701 <BTR1702@ix.netcom.com>
wrote:
In article <utSdnQ7fM4uYieCiRTvU2Q@giganews.com>, Uncle Samuel
<stars@bars> wrote:
BTR1701 wrote:
In article <jrfpnv05208gqrij5k7cbp6nm61lcqnom8@4ax.com>, Uncle
Samuel <stars@bars> wrote:
On Thu, 02 Oct 2003 22:39:42 GMT, BTR1701
<BTR1702@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
In article <slgonvsbsj0g6j8au0lo9bcrn8965urh6s@4ax.com>, Uncle
Samuel <stars@bars> wrote:
On Thu, 2 Oct 2003 08:21:13 -0600, "=> Vox Populi ©"
<vox@popu.li> wrote:
and adhere to God's law.
Which god?
Nature's God.
And which god is that?
The God.
The God of our founding fathers.
And which god is that? What are its characteristics? Where is it?
In the DOI - read up!
Where in the Declaration does it describe this god's
characteristics
The characteristics are denoted in this passage:
"all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator
with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty
and the pursuit of Happiness."
That is one characteristically awesome God doncha think?
Nothing in the DOI claiming that "their Creator" or any "creator" is
a god ... much less "The God" you ignorant shitsniffer.
Ipso facto.
God = Nature's God = the Creator = just what I said, not your hateful alterations...
lies = ***** = morons and imbeciles
who beleive in it.
Poor hateful cynic.
Ipso facto.
Atheist in torment.
and location?
None mentioned, but we can presume England wasn't implied...
So god was a geographic imbecile like you ...?
Well we were in the act of a geo-political divorce at the time. It's
not a terrible reach to think that the founding father's might have
wondered if God was of any import to the tyrants in England.
So they fabricated and perverted the actual characteristics and
definition of "god" ... eh?
They did?
Where?
Cite!
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Sock Puppet" |
|
| Title: Re: Colo. Official: Jurors Answerable to God |
02 Oct 2003 12:05:02 PM |
|
|
WTF does that mean?
I'll take the laws of Vishnu, then. And how about a female Gaia
conceptual deity, as well.
Uncle Samuel wrote:
On Thu, 2 Oct 2003 08:21:13 -0600, "=> Vox Populi ©" <vox@popu.li>
wrote:
and adhere
to God's law.
Which god?
Nature's God.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Uncle Samuel stars@bars" |
|
| Title: Re: Colo. Official: Jurors Answerable to God |
02 Oct 2003 01:09:07 PM |
|
|
On Thu, 02 Oct 2003 17:05:02 GMT, Sock Puppet
<unclesam@bite.mynads.org> wrote:
| | |
