Re: Court rules atheism a religion



 Religions > Atheism > Re: Court rules atheism a religion

LINK TO THIS PAGE  


rating :  0   |  0


  Page 1 of 1
Topic: Religions > Atheism
User: ""
Date: 22 Aug 2005 10:35:32 AM
Object: Re: Court rules atheism a religion
Rich Travsky <" traRvEsky"@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote:

:|1866 Dead wrote:
:|>
:|> On Sun, 21 Aug 2005 21:45:46 -0600, Rich Travsky <"
:|> traRvEsky"@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote:
:|>
:|> >Dana wrote:
:|> >>
:|> >> "1866 Dead" <zepp1866#2211finestplanet.com> wrote in message
:|> >> news:oo7gg15tdeveug2ec3fcerco18vh2aurjt@4ax.com...
:|> >> > On Sun, 21 Aug 2005 01:41:15 GMT, Sonof Ravenson
:|> >> > <theskald@pacbell.net> wrote:
:|> >> >
:|> >> > >
:|> >> > >1863 Dead wrote:
:|> >> > >> On Sat, 20 Aug 2005 09:01:01 -0800, "Dana" <whoya@whoya.com> wrote:
:|> >> > >>
:|> >> > >>
:|> >> > >>>http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=45874
:|> >> > >>>Court rules atheism a religion
:|> >> > >>>Decides 1st Amendment protects prison inmate's right to start study
:|> >> group
:|> >> > >>>
:|> >> > >>>A federal court of appeals ruled yesterday Wisconsin prison officials
:|> >> > >>>violated an inmate's rights because they did not treat atheism as a
:|> >> > >>>religion.
:|> >> > >>>"Atheism is [the inmate's] religion, and the group that he wanted to
:|> >> start
:|> >> > >>>was religious in nature even though it expressly rejects a belief in a
:|> >> > >>>supreme being," the 7th Circuit Court of Appeals said.
:|> >> > >>
:|> >> > >>
:|> >> > >> The lack of a case name made me suspicious, and so I did a little
:|> >> > >> checking. Like much from World Nut Daily, this story is utter
:|> >> > >> *****.
:|> >> > >
:|> >> > > http://www.ca7.uscourts.gov/tmp/LF185GID.pdf
:|> >> >
:|> >> > Ah, whaddya know. Decision came down yesterday
:|> >>
:|> >> So again you were wrong.
:|> >
:|> >Dead link.
:|>
:|> Link works. World Nut Daily just lied about what it said, is all.
:|
:|Nah, just tried it again: the page cannot be found
:|
:| http://www.ca7.uscourts.gov/tmp/LF185GID.pdf
:|
:|that's a temp folder? is it somewheres else?

Yes it is, the following is being added to our website
The Constitutional Principle: Separation of Church and State
http://members.tripod.com/~candst/index.html
under the section
RECENTLY IN THE COURTS
AUGUST 19, 2005
--------------------------------------------------------------
U.S. 7th Circuit Court of Appeals
--------------------------------------------------------------
Kaufman v. McCaughtry (08/19/05 - No. 04-1914)
Dismissal of plaintiff's Establishment Clause claim, alleging that
defendants infringed on his right to practice his religion when they
refused to allow him to create an inmate study group to discuss atheism, is
vacated where defendants' actions do not have a secular purpose.
To read the full text of this opinion, go to:[PDF File]
http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/data2/circs/7th/041914p.pdf [PDF File]
***************************************************************
You are invited to check out the following:
The Rise of the Theocratic States of America
http://members.tripod.com/~candst/theocracy.htm
The Constitutional Principle: Separation of Church and State
http://members.tripod.com/~candst/index.html
[and to join the discussion group for the above site and/or Separation of
Church and State in general, listed below]
HRSepCnS · Hampton Roads SepChurch&State
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/HRSepCnS/
[Its not just Hampton Roads folks who are members]
For people in Hampton Roads area of Virginia you are also invited to join
NORFOLK/VA. B. SEPARATION OF CHURCH AND STATE MEETUP GROUP
http://churchandstate.meetup.com/47/
Virginia Chapter Americans United for Separation of Church and State
http://au-va.org/
***************************************************************
.. . . You can't understand a phrase such as "Congress shall make no law
respecting an establishment of religion" by syllogistic reasoning. Words
take their meaning from social as well as textual contexts, which is why "a
page of history is worth a volume of logic." New York Trust Co. v. Eisner,
256 U.S. 345, 349, 41 S.Ct. 506, 507, 65 L.Ed. 963 (1921) (Holmes, J.).
Sherman v. Community Consol. Dist. 21, 980 F.2d 437, 445 (7th Cir. 1992)
.. . .
****************************************************************
THE CONSTITUTIONAL PRINCIPLE:
SEPARATION OF CHURCH AND STATE

http://members.tripod.com/~candst/index.html
"Dedicated to combatting 'history by sound bite'."
Now including a re-publication of Tom Peters
SEPARATION OF CHURCH AND STATE HOME PAGE
and
Audio links to Supreme Court oral arguments and
Speech by civil rights/constitutional lawyer and others.
This site is a member of the following web rings:
Freethought Ring--&--Freethought, Religion & Beliefs Ring
The First Amendment Ring--&--The Church-State Ring
American History WebRing--&--The History Ring
Let Freedom Ring--&--Religious Freedom Ring
Law Issues Ring--&--Legal Research Ring
****************************************************************
.

 

NEWER

pg.3585     pg.2749     pg.2106     pg.1612     pg.1232     pg.940     pg.716     pg.544     pg.412     pg.311     pg.234     pg.175     pg.130     pg.96     pg.70     pg.50     pg.35     pg.24     pg.16     pg.10     pg.6     pg.3     pg.1

OLDER