"Dimetrodon" <quarry@permian.per> wrote in message
news:pYUgj.343303$WF3.113766@fe06.news.easynews.com...

Mark Sebree wrote:

On Jan 5, 1:12 pm, lithodendron <carr...@butte.az> wrote:

Free Lunch wrote:

On Sat, 05 Jan 2008 06:41:47 GMT, in alt.atheism
lithodendron <carr...@butte.az> wrote in
<KEFfj.15815$gU7.12...@fe09.news.easynews.com>:

DanielSan wrote:

lithodendron wrote:

DanielSan wrote:

lithodendron wrote:

Free Lunch wrote:

On Sat, 05 Jan 2008 02:38:32 GMT, in alt.atheism lithodendron
<carr...@butte.az> wrote in
<H4Cfj.171908$DQ1.52...@fe03.news.easynews.com>:

Mark Sebree wrote:

On Jan 4, 7:22 pm, lithodendron <carr...@butte.az> wrote:

Free Lunch wrote:

Marriage is a contract. Why shouldn't two people who happen
to
have the
same sex have such a contract.

They can, as long as it it NOT called marriage.

If it has the same rights as marriage and the same
responsibilities as
marriage, why shouldn't be called marriage

Because it PERVERTS the accepted social NORM of what marriage
was
designed to be and is known as - you amoral perv.

So, your small-minded hate-filled bigotry

Um....man+woman = normal...hello?????

Um...man+man and woman+woman = normal too...hello?????

No, not normal, less than 2% of the population = PERVERTED!

At what percentage rate does something become "normal"?

At what % do you freaks stop truing to revise reality?

Are you really so blind that you cannot see that many of the folks who
support fair treatment for all are not gay?

At what point will you stop trying to DESTROY societal norms?

How about when the social "norms" provide equality and fair treatment
to everyone?

Is it fair for gays to raise children?

No.

Why not?