Published on Sunday, December 5, 2004 by the Richmond Times-Dispatch
(Richmond, Virginia)
Creationists Try to Edge Around Ban
by Marilyn Rauber


WASHINGTON - Creationism is a mandatory class at Virginia's Liberty
University, a Christian college founded in Lynchburg by evangelist
Jerry Falwell.

"Unlike secular institutions, we give both sides," biology professor
Terry Spohn said.

But it's not just parochial schools that are pushing the biblical
version of how humans were created.

Nearly 20 years after the U.S. Supreme Court barred teaching
creationism in public schools, state and local officials in 43 states
over the past four years have proposed new ways to get around the
ban, according to the National Center for Science Education, a
California-based organization of educators and clergy.

The latest effort is to teach high school students "intelligent
design" - which attributes the origin of the world to an intelligent
designer, without using the word "God," and embraces some aspects of
science.

Next month, ninth-graders in Dover, Pa., will become the first public
school students in the nation to be taught "intelligent design"
alongside evolution.

In Ohio, state school officials are urging local public schools to
teach a "critical analysis" of evolution.

Overall, the pro-evolution side is winning the battle over what
students learn in high school science: None of the anti-evolution
bills introduced in 17 states this past year became law.

But the tactic that most worries supporters of evolution is the use of
anti-evolution disclaimers inserted into science textbooks.

A federal judge in Georgia is expected to rule soon on the
constitutionality of a Cobb County School Board decision to put a
sticker inside each science textbook proclaiming that evolution is
"not a fact."

Only Alabama mandates statewide evolution disclaimers in its
textbooks. However, copycat bills have recently surfaced in roughly a
half-dozen states, including South Carolina, Mississippi and
Louisiana.

If the American Civil Liberties Union loses the case, "we expect to
see the Cobb County disclaimer pop up everywhere," said Glenn Branch,
deputy director of the national science education center.

"If you don't talk about your religious motivations, it's a lot harder
to convince a judge that its real objective is religious," Branch
added.

Private schools like Liberty are not bound by the 1987 high court
ruling that teaching creationism is a violation of the separation of
church and state.

"We cover evolution, but we bring up problems with it," said David
DeWitt, an associate professor of biology.

DeWitt believes all students should "have the academic freedom to
question evolution. . . . I think it's dishonest to shove evolution
down these students' throats as a fact."

But Cobb County high school biology teacher Wes McCoy argues that
students need to be taught "a rational, step-by-step explanation of
evolution" based on "authentic science" and that does not contradict
religious beliefs.

"Science can only focus on naturalistic explanations of the world. .
. . Science cannot tell us why we are here," said McCoy, who testified
against the disclaimer stickers in the Cobb County case.

Other evolution supporters argue that ideas like "intelligent design"
aren't academic subjects and don't belong in academic courses.

"Why don't we talk about astrology in astronomy class, why don't we
talk about the Christian Science theory of medicine in medical class?
. . . The point is, it's not science," said Sarah Pallas, a Georgia
State University biology teacher.

John Morris, president of the Institute for Creation Research, a
Christian think tank, agrees that religion should be kept out of the
public schools.

But Morris, a proponent of teaching students "intelligent design,"
believes the theory of evolution is a type of unproven religion based
on "weak" scientific evidence.

"Science has to do with the here and now." Evolution and other ideas
on the origins of Earth "are views about history," he said.

President Bush advocates teaching children "different theories about
how the world started" and "scientific critiques of any theory."

Most Americans agree with him.

Nearly 80 years since the Scopes "Monkey Trial" pitted evolutionists
against creationists, a CBS poll last month found that almost two
thirds of Americans favor teaching creationism and evolution in
public schools.

Last month, voters across the country backed a number of
pro-creationism candidates, including Sen.-elect Jim DeMint, R-S.C.,
who attacked his opponent, state Education Superintendent Inez
Tenenbaum, for pushing evolution in schools.

Even the Bush-backed No Child Left Behind education reforms contain
nonbinding language encouraging schools to teach "the full range of
scientific views" on evolution.

http://www.commondreams.org/headlines04/1205-11.htm