Re: Critical Error ... NO "Broken Jaw"



 Religions > Atheism > Re: Critical Error ... NO "Broken Jaw"

LINK TO THIS PAGE  


rating :  0   |  0


  Page 1 of 1
Topic: Religions > Atheism
User: "S. O. Damocles"
Date: 22 Dec 2004 01:58:18 PM
Object: Re: Critical Error ... NO "Broken Jaw"
Ken Smith wrote:

Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:

Kent Wills wrote:

Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:

Kent Wills wrote:

"jls" <jls1016@bellsouth.net> wrote:

Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:



There is MUCH that you don't know about THIS case.


I know very little about it, probably almost as little as
you do.


It's only logical to presume Ted knows more than we. He is,
after all, Cameron's brother-in-law. Clearly he doesn't know
anything as explosive as he'd have us believe.


Would you believe "H-Bomb" class?


No.


No surprise there.

I'd be more inclined to think Black Cat brand fire cracker.


If it were just that, I'd post it here. But one has to handle an
H-Bomb MUCH more carefully than a firecracker. And if it misfires
on you, you're not just toast, you're VAPOUR!


Suuuuuuurrrrre. It sounds like it's going to be another one of
those patented "Satanic cult" theories Geragos tried to pull out of
his hat in the Peterson case.

Funny, give the pathetic religious pig-ignorance of the average 'murrrikan,
such "satan did it" defenses are part of the trick-bag of all hyped defense
lawyers these days.
I attended a lunch briefing with the Ramsey's Defense Investigator
and that wack-job Lou Smitt at Effrain's in Boulder some years ago,
where those 2 grown men actually laid out there "extensive" research
into "Satanic Cults" as it was going to be offered as a possible
deflection for JonBenet's murder.
Those 2 morons were actually serious, and expected other's to
take them seriously. It was all I could do to not burst into
fits of laughter after hearing them spew utter nonsense for
30 minutes.
When I finally asked them, based upon their "extensive research"
into Satanism, which sect of Satanism actually practiced, much less
called for, fake kidnapping and murdering children as part of
their dogma, they were stunned into slack-jawed silence that
anyone would dare ask such an (im)pertinent question.
The new Defense Lawyer's paradigm must be:
My Client doesn't own a gun...
My Client's gun didn't kill the victim...
My Client shot and killed the victim in self-defense...
Satan did it! ...
.

 

NEWER

pg.3585     pg.2749     pg.2106     pg.1612     pg.1232     pg.940     pg.716     pg.544     pg.412     pg.311     pg.234     pg.175     pg.130     pg.96     pg.70     pg.50     pg.35     pg.24     pg.16     pg.10     pg.6     pg.3     pg.1

OLDER