Religions > Atheism > Re: Dembski: "...if God does not exist, then evolution is the only
| Topic: |
Religions > Atheism |
| User: |
"SRNissen" |
| Date: |
18 Jun 2006 12:52:01 PM |
| Object: |
Re: Dembski: "...if God does not exist, then evolution is the only |
Ray wrote:
On 16 Jun 2006 14:09:05 -0700, "Thought Provoker" <dfcord@hotmail.com>
wrote:
I re-read Dembski's post multiple times. I don't see how this can be
any clearer...
"The problem is not that evolution implies God does't exist. The
problem is that if God does not exist, then evolution is the only
possibility.
http://www.uncommondescent.com/
Is there any doubt left that Dembski truly believes Intelligent Design
requires the existence of a supernatural God?
Explain to me again how ID isn't inherently religious.
What has the existence of God to do with religion? If God exist, his
existence does not depend on whether there are religions or not, just
as the existence of gravity does not depend on scientific theories.
I know God (defined as The Creator of all things physical) exist, but
I'm not religious. I know ID is a fact, but that doesn't make me
religious either.
See, if you could prove the existence of God, I would agree with you
that His existence is a fact. Since you can't, it's religion. Was that
so hard?
- SRNissen
FABRICATE DIEM, PVNC
.
|
|
| User: "Ray" |
|
| Title: Re: Dembski: "...if God does not exist, then evolution is the only |
19 Jun 2006 10:02:23 AM |
|
|
On Sun, 18 Jun 2006 19:52:01 +0200, SRNissen <soren.nissen@gmail.com>
wrote:
Ray wrote:
On 16 Jun 2006 14:09:05 -0700, "Thought Provoker" <dfcord@hotmail.com>
wrote:
I re-read Dembski's post multiple times. I don't see how this can be
any clearer...
"The problem is not that evolution implies God does't exist. The
problem is that if God does not exist, then evolution is the only
possibility.
http://www.uncommondescent.com/
Is there any doubt left that Dembski truly believes Intelligent Design
requires the existence of a supernatural God?
Explain to me again how ID isn't inherently religious.
What has the existence of God to do with religion? If God exist, his
existence does not depend on whether there are religions or not, just
as the existence of gravity does not depend on scientific theories.
I know God (defined as The Creator of all things physical) exist, but
I'm not religious. I know ID is a fact, but that doesn't make me
religious either.
See, if you could prove the existence of God, I would agree with you
that His existence is a fact. Since you can't, it's religion. Was that
so hard?
I see proof of God's existence everywhere. Therefore it isn't religion
me.
But if you don't see any proof of God's existenxe, it may be religion
for you, of course.
.
|
|
|
| User: "thomas p" |
|
| Title: Re: Dembski: "...if God does not exist, then evolution is the only |
20 Jun 2006 02:31:49 PM |
|
|
On Mon, 19 Jun 2006 17:02:23 +0200, Ray <ray@addr.invalid> wrote:
On Sun, 18 Jun 2006 19:52:01 +0200, SRNissen <soren.nissen@gmail.com>
wrote:
Ray wrote:
On 16 Jun 2006 14:09:05 -0700, "Thought Provoker" <dfcord@hotmail.com>
wrote:
I re-read Dembski's post multiple times. I don't see how this can be
any clearer...
"The problem is not that evolution implies God does't exist. The
problem is that if God does not exist, then evolution is the only
possibility.
http://www.uncommondescent.com/
Is there any doubt left that Dembski truly believes Intelligent Design
requires the existence of a supernatural God?
Explain to me again how ID isn't inherently religious.
What has the existence of God to do with religion? If God exist, his
existence does not depend on whether there are religions or not, just
as the existence of gravity does not depend on scientific theories.
I know God (defined as The Creator of all things physical) exist, but
I'm not religious. I know ID is a fact, but that doesn't make me
religious either.
See, if you could prove the existence of God, I would agree with you
that His existence is a fact. Since you can't, it's religion. Was that
so hard?
I see proof of God's existence everywhere. Therefore it isn't religion
me.
But if you don't see any proof of God's existenxe, it may be religion
for you, of course.
Evidence is something that can be shown and tested. One does not need
faith to see evidence. Do you have anything like that?
Thomas P.
"Life must be lived forwards but understood backwards"
(Kierkegaard)
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "SRNissen" |
|
| Title: Re: Dembski: "...if God does not exist, then evolution is the only |
19 Jun 2006 01:18:28 PM |
|
|
Ray wrote:
On Sun, 18 Jun 2006 19:52:01 +0200, SRNissen <soren.nissen@gmail.com>
wrote:
Ray wrote:
On 16 Jun 2006 14:09:05 -0700, "Thought Provoker" <dfcord@hotmail.com>
wrote:
I re-read Dembski's post multiple times. I don't see how this can be
any clearer...
"The problem is not that evolution implies God does't exist. The
problem is that if God does not exist, then evolution is the only
possibility.
http://www.uncommondescent.com/
Is there any doubt left that Dembski truly believes Intelligent Design
requires the existence of a supernatural God?
Explain to me again how ID isn't inherently religious.
What has the existence of God to do with religion? If God exist, his
existence does not depend on whether there are religions or not, just
as the existence of gravity does not depend on scientific theories.
I know God (defined as The Creator of all things physical) exist, but
I'm not religious. I know ID is a fact, but that doesn't make me
religious either.
See, if you could prove the existence of God, I would agree with you
that His existence is a fact. Since you can't, it's religion. Was that
so hard?
I see proof of God's existence everywhere. Therefore it isn't religion
me.
But if you don't see any proof of God's existenxe, it may be religion
for you, of course.
Sorry, it's the other way around. You see things every day which your
religion makes you interpret as proof of God.
- SRNissen
FABRICATE DIEM, PVNC
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
