Religions > Atheism > Re: Family Advocate Angry Over Legislature's Pro-Homosexual Move
| Topic: |
Religions > Atheism |
| User: |
"John Shocked" |
| Date: |
03 Aug 2005 12:28:42 AM |
| Object: |
Re: Family Advocate Angry Over Legislature's Pro-Homosexual Move |
"Rob Wade" <rob_c_wade_03@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:1123014173.882696.167140@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com...
Family Advocate Angry Over Legislature's Pro-Homosexual Move
By Jim Brown
(AgapePress) - A Masschusetts pro-family group is blasting the state
legislature for overriding the governor's veto of a 70 percent increase
in state funding for homosexual programs in public schools.
Last month, Massachusetts Governor Mitt Romney vetoed a $175,000
funding increase for Gay Straight Alliance clubs and school assemblies
promoting same-sex "marriage." However, the state legislature, led by
House Ways and Means chairman Robert DeLeo, voted to override Romney.
Brian Camenker, who heads the Waltham-based group Article 8 Alliance,
recalls DeLeo's influence in the matter.
Amazing. I thought that whole Gay Straight Alliance crap was funded purely with
private Hollywood Hoimosexual funds. It is shocking that public money is being used
to sell your 17 year old Son Sodomy when he goes to college.
Absolutely shocking that your tax money is going to sell Sodomy to kids,
when overwhelmingly, those parents oppose homosexuals even becoming married
to each other, which is the least intrusive thing those people do.
Politics
=======================================================
One of the reasons the Hollywood Homosexuals behind Battlestar Galactica are pushing Sodomy
symbolisms in BSG is because they would desperately like to reverse some of the following results
which they encountered in all 11 states in the US on November 3 2004 (US election day) which
had Ballot Questions (plebiscital votes by voters in a state controlling their own state's laws)
on the Homosexual Marriage agenda. So if you are watching your favorite science fiction show and
then you notice something in the script which does not make sense, it may be that it was time for
Word From BSG's Sponsor, the Hollywood Homosexuals who are using the script as their
advertisement vehicle.
Homosexuals have had control of Hollywood since around 1992, when Clinton (and Jerry Brown) ran
for President the first time. Even though they have been pushing their agenda hard for all these
years, they are yet to win a single statewide vote. Clinton took homosexual money in 1992 and as
soon as he was inaugurated started to implement policies that he was bought and paid to implement
-- Gays In The Military, in 1993. This was an intense unpopular policy initiative, shocked the
public, and resulted in the Democrats losing both Houses of Congress in 1994, and started a
series of investigations into Clinton's personal life, resulting finally in his Impeachment in
1998. John Kerry (Democrat 2004 Presidential Candidate) again took homosexual money in the 2004
election year. Democrats do not have many sources of money, representing the poorer segments of
society. Since Kerry was from the state of Massachusetts, a state which earlier in 2004 legalized
Homosexual Marriage through a corrupt bribed out Judges judicial decision (not a vote by its
legislature) the onus was on John Kerry to separate himself from this suicidal issue in a very
public manner.
However, because Kerry took Hollywood Homosexual money in the 2004 year and before, he simply was
not able to do that. Thus in a year when Kerry was running for President against George W. Bush,
who had a terrible record, who had had the Economy collapse early in his first year (2001) and it
stayed that way till mid 2004, who also failed to prevent the 9-11 Attacks on the World Trade
Center in 2001, who lied to drag the US into a war against Iraq, when his allegations that Iraq
had Weapons Of Mass Destruction were false and various other failures, Kerry still could not win
because of the Homosexual agenda ball and chain around his neck. Kerry should have won this race
55%-45% if he was not carrying this Homosexual agenda ball and chain. And the following votes are
an in indication of how strongly people felt against this homosexual agenda Kerry was pushing.
Several of these 11 states were Swing States -- they were close in the previous election and
would decide the election in 2004. Many people went to vote against the Homosexual Agenda, and
voted against Kerry as an afterthought.
Now, Hollywood Homosexuals are wealthy fatcats and, despite popular misconceptions, are
overwhelming Republican. They do not want Democrats like John Kerry to win and then raise their
taxes. Thus, there may well be a scam going on here, to buy the Democrat candidate each year and
ask him to support something the US public despises -- this time it was Homosexual Marriage. If
this buying every 4 years of the Democrat candidate by Hollywood Homosexual fatcats continues,
it could be an extremely long time before the Democrats ever come close to taking back any of the
branches of government again.
==================================================
No, Hollywood Homosexuals are Republicans and should be Republicans. The Sodomy issue, along with
similar ACLU issues like the Legalization of Drugs, is one of those selfish issues that
generally come under the title "civil liberties". These are 'leave me alone', 'let me do what I
want to do', "do not raise my taxes", "keep the government out of my life"; selfish issues that
are not just conservative, but libertarian in nature. . Heck, if not for the federal government,
Unions would not exist. If not for the federal government, Blacks and Women would not have Civil
Rights. If not for the federal government, there would be no 60's Great Society programs for The
Poor, or what is left of those programs since Clinton (a big homosexual rights Gays In The
Military supporter) rolled them back. The federal government passed the Defense Of Marriage Act
which was anti-homosexual marriage rights.
The response of Hollywood Homosexuals ? Try to negate the federal government laws in the Courts
by playing up this crap that the Federal Courts can negate the laws created by the will of the
people (Judicial Review, they call it). The same US Supreme Court that ruled in Plessy vs
Ferguson in 1896 in the "Separate But Equal" decision that Blacks were second class citizens and
that segregation was ok. It was only in the 1950's, when the US Supreme Court was dominated by
non-Judges (only one of the 9 judges then had a judicial background -- the Chief Justice was
Governor of California immediately before joining the US Supreme Court in 1953), that Brown vs
Board of Education (1954) reversed the corrupt Plessy decision. And I should mention that the
14th Amendment passed right after the US Civil War which ended Slavery, banned any kind of racial
segregation State Laws, so the 1896 decision was unconstitutional, on its face.
=================================================
Some examples of Unconstitutional decisions by the US Supreme Court which hurt the little guy:
1) The Poor (1930's FDR impasse broken in 1937 when President Roosevelt threatened to pack the
Supreme Court),
2) Blacks (1896 Plessy vs Ferguson, legalizing racial segregation southern State laws, an
incredible decision, totally repudiating the 14th Amendment),
3) Unions (1930's FDR impasse broken in 1937 when President Roosevelt threatened to pack the
Supreme Court),
4) Women (denied the right to vote under 14th Amendment in Minor vs Happersett (1874)
5) The "Corporation" created out of thin air in the 14th Amendment: Robber Barons at the turn of
the century (ca 1900) and today's Enron alike, loved this decision. This was a US Supreme
Court decision which abused the 14th Amendment, which they refused to use to protect the
intended black men and black women, and instead used to protect predatory wealthy fatcats. In
incredible series of decisions.
=================================================
The truth is that Homosexuals have nothing in common with the Left, which comprises The Poor,
Blacks, Unions and Women). They should and do want opposite solutions in government policy.
=================================================
=======================================================
http://www.profam.org/press/thc_pr_040813.htm
In 2000, California voters approved a ballot question (Proposition 22), defining marriage as the
union of a man and a woman. In liberal, laid-back California, the vote in favor of upholding
traditional marriage was 61% to 39%. Blacks and Hispanics approved the measure by higher
percentages than whites.
========================================================
========================================================
Here are the results from the 11 States in November 2004 who had the Homosexual agenda on a
ballot question 5 months ago:
========================================================
Arkansas Ballot wording: Marriage consists only of the union of one man and one woman. Legal
status for unmarried persons which is identical or substantially similar to marital status shall
not be valid or recognized in Arkansas, except that the legislature may recognize a common law
marriage from another state between a man and a woman. The legislature has the power to determine
the capacity of persons to marry, subject to this amendment, and the legal rights, obligations,
privileges, and immunities of marriage.Result: Passed 75% to 25%
Georgia The measure amends the state constitution to include the following statement: (a) This
state shall recognize as marriage only the union of man and woman. Marriages between persons of
the same sex are prohibited in this state. (b) No union between persons of the same sex shall be
recognized by this state as entitled to the benefits of marriage. This state shall not give
effect to any public act, record, or judicial proceeding of any other state or jurisdiction
respecting a relationship between persons of the same sex that is treated as a marriage under the
laws of such other state or jurisdiction. The courts of this state shall have no jurisdiction to
grant a divorce or separate maintenance with respect to any such relationship or otherwise to
consider or rule on any of the parties' respective rights arising as a result of or in connection
with such relationship.Result: Passed 77% to 23%.
Kentucky Only a marriage between one man and one woman shall be valid or recognized as a marriage
in Kentucky. A legal status identical or substantially similar to that of marriage for unmarried
individuals shall not be valid or recognized.Result: Passed: 75% to 25%.
Michigan The measure amends the state constitution to include the following statement: To secure
and preserve the benefits of marriage for our society and for future generations of children, the
union of one man and one woman in marriage shall be the only agreement recognized as a marriage
or similar union for any purpose.Result: Passed: 59% to 41%.
Mississippi The measure amends the state constitution to read: Marriage may take place and may be
valid under the laws of this state only between a man and a woman. A marriage in another state or
foreign jurisdiction between persons of the same gender, regardless of when the marriage took
place, may not be recognized in this state and is void and unenforceable under the laws of this
state.Result: Passed: 86% to 14%.
Montana The measure amends the state constitution to read: Only a marriage between one man and
one woman shall be valid or recognized as a marriage in this state.Result: Passed: 66% to 34%.
North Dakota The measure amends the state constitution to include the following statement:
Marriage consists only of the legal union between a man and a woman. No other domestic union,
however denominated, may be recognized as a marriage or given the same or substantially
equivalent effect.Result: Passed 73% to 24%.
Ohio The measure amends the state constitution to include the following statement: Only a union
between one man and one woman may be a marriage valid in or recognized by this state and its
political subdivisions. This state and its political subdivisions shall not create or recognize a
legal status for relationships of unmarried individuals that intends to approximate the design,
qualities, significance or effect of marriage.Result: Passed 62% to 38%.
Oklahoma The measure amends the state constitution to read: A Marriage in this state shall
consist only of the union of one man and one woman. Neither this Constitution nor any other
provision of law shall be construed to require that marital status or the legal incidents thereof
be conferred upon unmarried couples or groups. B. A marriage between persons of the same gender
performed in another state shall not be recognized as valid and binding in this state as of the
date of the marriage. C. Any person knowingly issuing a marriage license in violation of this
section shall be guilty of a misdemeanor.Result: Passed 76% to 24%.
Oregon The measure would amend the state constitution to read: It is the policy of Oregon, and
its political subdivisions, that only a marriage between one man and one woman shall be valid or
legally recognized as a marriage.Result: Passed 57% to 43%.
Utah The measure amends the state constitution to read, 1. Marriage consists only of the legal
union between a man and a woman. 2. No other domestic status or union, however denominated,
between persons is valid or recognized or may be authorized, sanctioned, or given the same or
substantially equivalent legal effect as a marriage. Results: Passed 66% to 34%.
==================================================
Politics
=====================================================
=====================================================
"The chief of staff of this guy [DeLeo] had a phone conversation with
me [during which] he talked about, in very graphic ways, how he liked
these programs," the pro-family spokesman says.
Camenker notes that the conversation is described on his group's
website, but describes its content as "very, very disturbing" -- adding
that "that's the kind of culture that's going on in the Massachusetts
legislature." And that culture, he contends, exists mainly because the
homosexual movement "aggressively lobbies the legislature every single
day of the year."
As for the funding approved by the legislature, Camenker expects it
will be used to fund such things as the "Little Black Book" -- a
graphic how-to manual on homosexual sex that was recently distributed
at Massachusetts' Brookline High School -- and other pro-homosexual
promotions.
"Gay days in the public schools, assemblies, all kinds of homosexual
programs and clubs and handouts and counseling sessions with kids, and
their parades, their get-togethers downtown. It's every parent's
nightmare," he states.
According to Camenker, DeLeo changed his home phone number after
receiving hundreds of phone calls from parents urging him not to
override the governor's veto.
.
|
|
| User: "RoB WAde" |
|
| Title: Re: Family Advocate Angry Over Legislature's Pro-Homosexual Move |
03 Aug 2005 07:44:21 AM |
|
|
On Tue, 02 Aug 2005 22:28:42 -0700, "John Shocked" <jshocked@hotmail.com>
wrote:
"Rob Wade" <rob_c_wade_03@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1123014173.882696.167140@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com...
Family Advocate Angry Over Legislature's Pro-Homosexual Move By Jim
Brown
(AgapePress) - A Masschusetts pro-family group is blasting the state
legislature for overriding the governor's veto of a 70 percent increase
in state funding for homosexual programs in public schools.
Last month, Massachusetts Governor Mitt Romney vetoed a $175,000
funding increase for Gay Straight Alliance clubs and school assemblies
promoting same-sex "marriage." However, the state legislature, led by
House Ways and Means chairman Robert DeLeo, voted to override Romney.
Brian Camenker, who heads the Waltham-based group Article 8 Alliance,
recalls DeLeo's influence in the matter.
Amazing. I thought that whole Gay Straight Alliance crap was funded
purely with private Hollywood Hoimosexual funds. It is shocking that
public money is being used to sell your 17 year old Son Sodomy when he
goes to college. Absolutely shocking that your tax money is going to
sell Sodomy to kids, when overwhelmingly, those parents oppose
homosexuals even becoming married to each other, which is the least
intrusive thing those people do.
Politics
Oh, don't listen to me. I'm a *****-sucker.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Steve Christie" |
|
| Title: Re: Family Advocate Angry Over Legislature's Pro-Homosexual Move |
03 Aug 2005 08:36:05 AM |
|
|
Absolutely shocking that your tax money is going to
Did you know that homosexuals also pay taxes too? I guess in your world it
would only be fair that all homosexuals opt out of paying taxes. Since
according to your logic they have no right to expect their taxes will be
used for anything but your needs.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "John Shocked" |
|
| Title: Re: Family Advocate Angry Over Legislature's Pro-Homosexual Move |
03 Aug 2005 09:04:29 AM |
|
|
"RoB WAde" <rob_c_wade_1@yahooo.com> wrote in message news:F_2Ie.47$Je.14@newsread2.news.atl.earthlink.net...
On Tue, 02 Aug 2005 22:28:42 -0700, "John Shocked" <jshocked@hotmail.com>
wrote:
"Rob Wade" <rob_c_wade_03@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1123014173.882696.167140@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com...
Family Advocate Angry Over Legislature's Pro-Homosexual Move By Jim
Brown
(AgapePress) - A Masschusetts pro-family group is blasting the state
legislature for overriding the governor's veto of a 70 percent increase
in state funding for homosexual programs in public schools.
Last month, Massachusetts Governor Mitt Romney vetoed a $175,000
funding increase for Gay Straight Alliance clubs and school assemblies
promoting same-sex "marriage." However, the state legislature, led by
House Ways and Means chairman Robert DeLeo, voted to override Romney.
Brian Camenker, who heads the Waltham-based group Article 8 Alliance,
recalls DeLeo's influence in the matter.
Amazing. I thought that whole Gay Straight Alliance crap was funded
purely with private Hollywood Hoimosexual funds. It is shocking that
public money is being used to sell your 17 year old Son Sodomy when he
goes to college. Absolutely shocking that your tax money is going to
sell Sodomy to kids, when overwhelmingly, those parents oppose
homosexuals even becoming married to each other, which is the least
intrusive thing those people do.
Politics
Oh, don't listen to me. I'm a *****-sucker.
These sorts of fake messages ought to be illegal, or at the very least ought to be considered
the most serious form of Slander/Libel.
Again, note this easy ability amongst Hollywood Homosexuals to substitute one person for another,
one character trait for another, one morality for another. Either a man or a woman for a partner.
Or a dog. Or a horse. Without a conscience.
I do not find this ability to this degree in any other segment of society.
And perhaps it is this capability for inherent dishonesty that leads to good acting.
Politics
.
|
|
|
| User: "John Shocked" |
|
| Title: Re: Family Advocate Angry Over Legislature's Pro-Homosexual Move |
03 Aug 2005 09:55:20 AM |
|
|
On Wed, 03 Aug 2005 07:04:29 -0700, John Shocked wrote:
"RoB WAde" <rob_c_wade_1@yahooo.com> wrote in message
news:F_2Ie.47$Je.14@newsread2.news.atl.earthlink.net...
On Tue, 02 Aug 2005 22:28:42 -0700, "John Shocked"
<jshocked@hotmail.com> wrote:
"Rob Wade" <rob_c_wade_03@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1123014173.882696.167140@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com...
Family Advocate Angry Over Legislature's Pro-Homosexual Move By Jim
Brown
(AgapePress) - A Masschusetts pro-family group is blasting the state
legislature for overriding the governor's veto of a 70 percent
increase in state funding for homosexual programs in public schools.
Last month, Massachusetts Governor Mitt Romney vetoed a $175,000
funding increase for Gay Straight Alliance clubs and school
assemblies promoting same-sex "marriage." However, the state
legislature, led by House Ways and Means chairman Robert DeLeo, voted
to override Romney. Brian Camenker, who heads the Waltham-based group
Article 8 Alliance, recalls DeLeo's influence in the matter.
Amazing. I thought that whole Gay Straight Alliance crap was funded
purely with private Hollywood Hoimosexual funds. It is shocking that
public money is being used to sell your 17 year old Son Sodomy when he
goes to college. Absolutely shocking that your tax money is going to
sell Sodomy to kids, when overwhelmingly, those parents oppose
homosexuals even becoming married to each other, which is the least
intrusive thing those people do.
Politics
Oh, don't listen to me. I'm a *****-sucker.
These sorts of fake messages ought to be illegal, or at the very least
ought to be considered the most serious form of Slander/Libel. Again,
note this easy ability amongst Hollywood Homosexuals to substitute one
person for another, one character trait for another, one morality for
another. Either a man or a woman for a partner. Or a dog. Or a horse.
Without a conscience. I do not find this ability to this degree in any
other segment of society. And perhaps it is this capability for inherent
dishonesty that leads to good acting.
Politics
BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAH!!!!!!!!!!
.
|
|
|
| User: "John Shocked" |
|
| Title: Re: Family Advocate Angry Over Legislature's Pro-Homosexual Move |
03 Aug 2005 01:26:28 PM |
|
|
"John Shocked" <jshokced@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:sV4Ie.218$RZ2.192@newsread3.news.atl.earthlink.net...
On Wed, 03 Aug 2005 07:04:29 -0700, John Shocked wrote:
"RoB WAde" <rob_c_wade_1@yahooo.com> wrote in message
news:F_2Ie.47$Je.14@newsread2.news.atl.earthlink.net...
On Tue, 02 Aug 2005 22:28:42 -0700, "John Shocked"
<jshocked@hotmail.com> wrote:
"Rob Wade" <rob_c_wade_03@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1123014173.882696.167140@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com...
Family Advocate Angry Over Legislature's Pro-Homosexual Move By Jim Brown
(AgapePress) - A Masschusetts pro-family group is blasting the state
legislature for overriding the governor's veto of a 70 percent
increase in state funding for homosexual programs in public schools.
Last month, Massachusetts Governor Mitt Romney vetoed a $175,000
funding increase for Gay Straight Alliance clubs and school
assemblies promoting same-sex "marriage." However, the state
legislature, led by House Ways and Means chairman Robert DeLeo, voted
to override Romney. Brian Camenker, who heads the Waltham-based group
Article 8 Alliance, recalls DeLeo's influence in the matter.
Amazing. I thought that whole Gay Straight Alliance crap was funded
purely with private Hollywood Hoimosexual funds. It is shocking that
public money is being used to sell your 17 year old Son Sodomy when he
goes to college. Absolutely shocking that your tax money is going to
sell Sodomy to kids, when overwhelmingly, those parents oppose
homosexuals even becoming married to each other, which is the least
intrusive thing those people do.
Politics
Oh, don't listen to me. I'm a *****-sucker.
These sorts of fake messages ought to be illegal, or at the very least
ought to be considered the most serious form of Slander/Libel. Again,
note this easy ability amongst Hollywood Homosexuals to substitute one
person for another, one character trait for another, one morality for
another. Either a man or a woman for a partner. Or a dog. Or a horse.
Without a conscience. I do not find this ability to this degree in any
other segment of society. And perhaps it is this capability for inherent
dishonesty that leads to good acting.
Politics
BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAH!!!!!!!!!!
Another fake message.
Politics
.
|
|
|
| User: "The Secretary of HomIntern" |
|
| Title: Re: Family Advocate Angry Over Legislature's Pro-Homosexual Move |
03 Aug 2005 06:44:45 PM |
|
|
I'll never know another John Shocked like John Shocked in
alt.politics.homosexuality, they're so drad:
"John Shocked" wrote...
On Wed, 03 Aug 2005 07:04:29 -0700, John Shocked wrote:
"RoB WAde" wrote...
On Tue, 02 Aug 2005 22:28:42 -0700, "John Shocked" wrote:
"Rob Wade" wrote...
Family Advocate Angry Over Legislature's Pro-Homosexual Move By Jim
Brown (AgapePress) - A Masschusetts pro-family group is blasting the
state legislature for overriding the governor's veto of a 70 percent
increase in state funding for homosexual programs in public schools.
Last month, Massachusetts Governor Mitt Romney vetoed a $175,000
funding increase for Gay Straight Alliance clubs and school
assemblies promoting same-sex "marriage." However, the state
legislature, led by House Ways and Means chairman Robert DeLeo, voted
to override Romney. Brian Camenker, who heads the Waltham-based group
Article 8 Alliance, recalls DeLeo's influence in the matter.
Amazing. I thought that whole Gay Straight Alliance crap was funded
purely with private Hollywood Hoimosexual funds. It is shocking that
public money is being used to sell your 17 year old Son Sodomy when he
goes to college. Absolutely shocking that your tax money is going to
sell Sodomy to kids, when overwhelmingly, those parents oppose
homosexuals even becoming married to each other, which is the least
intrusive thing those people do.
Politics
Oh, don't listen to me. I'm a *****-sucker.
These sorts of fake messages ought to be illegal, or at the very least
ought to be considered the most serious form of Slander/Libel. Again,
note this easy ability amongst Hollywood Homosexuals to substitute one
person for another, one character trait for another, one morality for
another. Either a man or a woman for a partner. Or a dog. Or a horse.
Without a conscience. I do not find this ability to this degree in any
other segment of society. And perhaps it is this capability for inherent
dishonesty that leads to good acting.
Politics
BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAH!!!!!!!!!!
Another fake message.
Stop it, Fred, you're making my irony meter break down.
--
_______________________________________________
Hail Eris! "The personal _is_ political."
Superfaggot; GGGHD; MWFA; HCNB; MU; BCB; FI
Economic Left/Right: -7.63
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -7.38
Killfiled by: directory
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "John Shocked" |
|
| Title: Re: Family Advocate Angry Over Legislature's Pro-Homosexual Move |
03 Aug 2005 06:04:41 PM |
|
|
On Wed, 03 Aug 2005 11:26:28 -0700, John Shocked wrote:
"John Shocked" <jshokced@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:sV4Ie.218$RZ2.192@newsread3.news.atl.earthlink.net...
On Wed, 03 Aug 2005 07:04:29 -0700, John Shocked wrote:
"RoB WAde" <rob_c_wade_1@yahooo.com> wrote in message
news:F_2Ie.47$Je.14@newsread2.news.atl.earthlink.net...
On Tue, 02 Aug 2005 22:28:42 -0700, "John Shocked"
<jshocked@hotmail.com> wrote:
"Rob Wade" <rob_c_wade_03@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1123014173.882696.167140@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com...
Family Advocate Angry Over Legislature's Pro-Homosexual Move By Jim
Brown (AgapePress) - A Masschusetts pro-family group is blasting
the state legislature for overriding the governor's veto of a 70
percent increase in state funding for homosexual programs in public
schools. Last month, Massachusetts Governor Mitt Romney vetoed a
$175,000 funding increase for Gay Straight Alliance clubs and
school assemblies promoting same-sex "marriage." However, the state
legislature, led by House Ways and Means chairman Robert DeLeo,
voted to override Romney. Brian Camenker, who heads the
Waltham-based group Article 8 Alliance, recalls DeLeo's influence
in the matter.
Amazing. I thought that whole Gay Straight Alliance crap was funded
purely with private Hollywood Hoimosexual funds. It is shocking
that public money is being used to sell your 17 year old Son Sodomy
when he goes to college. Absolutely shocking that your tax money is
going to sell Sodomy to kids, when overwhelmingly, those parents
oppose homosexuals even becoming married to each other, which is the
least intrusive thing those people do.
Politics
Oh, don't listen to me. I'm a *****-sucker.
These sorts of fake messages ought to be illegal, or at the very least
ought to be considered the most serious form of Slander/Libel. Again,
note this easy ability amongst Hollywood Homosexuals to substitute one
person for another, one character trait for another, one morality for
another. Either a man or a woman for a partner. Or a dog. Or a
horse.
Without a conscience. I do not find this ability to this degree in
any
other segment of society. And perhaps it is this capability for
inherent dishonesty that leads to good acting. Politics
BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAH!!!!!!!!!!
Another fake message.
Politics
A regular Sherlock Holmes, this one.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
