| Topic: |
Religions > Atheism |
| User: |
"Sun of our Sun" |
| Date: |
03 Oct 2006 09:28:05 PM |
| Object: |
Re: "Fundies" Vs. The Past, Present & Future... `~ |
On 3 Oct 2006, wrote:
There is a tendency of atheists to try to link Christians and Jews with
violent muslims. Thus the term "fundamentalist" is used to cover for
all of them. But look at the severe violence demonstrated in atheistic
lands, such as the Soviet Union. Crimes against humanity. You could
call them "fundamentalist atheists". Fundamentalist athiests like to
demonize Christians and do so all the time.
Sgr A* wrote:
<snip>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Yes indeed, they sure do. Intolerance for the viewpoints
of non-Atheists is most self-evident among the hard-line
Atheists. And because they monopolized America's public
schools and courtrooms for so many decades now, they've
entirely lost the ability to conscientiously challenge
worldly so-called "authority". Neither can the Atheists
ever engage in substantive dialogue with non-Atheists,
most especially not with those of us who draw attention
to their myriads of abject blunders and bold-faced lies
which the Atheists are unable to convincingly defend, at
least not to individuals capable of independent thought.
As a result, they can only fall back on their trademark
ad hominem ad nauseam ad infinitum, e.g. "all Christians
are brain-dead morons", all "non-Atheists are inferior
to us intellectually-superior Atheists", etc. etc. etc.
That's okay. They can register their complaints with
St. Peter when they meet him at the Pearly Gates. :)
Enjoy!
Daniel Joseph Min
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
iQA/AwUBRSLFwJljD7YrHM/nEQIoVgCfWEK1hC+n/JoI4naXz/xLW6Mqkf8An0LW
qIzf5UT8Gsaf8qjSejhCs2mo
=//NW
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
.
|
|
| User: "Bill M" |
|
| Title: Re: "Fundies" Vs. The Past, Present & Future... `~ |
03 Oct 2006 11:47:30 PM |
|
|
"Sun of our Sun" <anon@comments.header> wrote in message
news:Z31TSTVS38993.7278356481@twistycreek.com...
On 3 Oct 2006, wrote:
There is a tendency of atheists to try to link Christians and Jews with
violent muslims. Thus the term "fundamentalist" is used to cover for
all of them. But look at the severe violence demonstrated in atheistic
lands, such as the Soviet Union. Crimes against humanity. You could
call them "fundamentalist atheists". Fundamentalist athiests like to
demonize Christians and do so all the time.
Sgr A* wrote:
<snip>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Yes indeed, they sure do. Intolerance for the viewpoints
of non-Atheists is most self-evident among the hard-line
Atheists. And because they monopolized America's public
schools and courtrooms for so many decades now, they've
entirely lost the ability to conscientiously challenge
worldly so-called "authority".
Your bitter unintellgent tirade is without any evidence. This nation has
over 1,000
different religions. How could we decide which one to teach??? Our
government and Constitution
was formualted on the principle of 'seperation' of church and State. Atheism
is neiother taught nor
encuraged in our public schools.
It is obvious this is a sound principle.
Neither can the Atheists
ever engage in substantive dialogue with non-Atheists,
most especially not with those of us who draw attention
to their myriads of abject blunders and bold-faced lies
which the Atheists are unable to convincingly defend, at
least not to individuals capable of independent thought.
Where is your evidence for this dishonest and nonsensicle claim?
As a result, they can only fall back on their trademark
ad hominem ad nauseam ad infinitum, e.g. "all Christians
are brain-dead morons", all "non-Atheists are inferior
to us intellectually-superior Atheists", etc. etc. etc.
More nonsensicle dishonesty.
That's okay. They can register their complaints with
St. Peter when they meet him at the Pearly Gates. :)
Enjoy!
Daniel Joseph Min
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
iQA/AwUBRSLFwJljD7YrHM/nEQIoVgCfWEK1hC+n/JoI4naXz/xLW6Mqkf8An0LW
qIzf5UT8Gsaf8qjSejhCs2mo
=//NW
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
.
|
|
|
| User: "Amber LaStrega" |
|
| Title: Re: "Fundies" Vs. The Past, Present & Future... `~ |
04 Oct 2006 07:25:18 AM |
|
|
"all Christians
are brain-dead morons", all "non-Atheists are inferior
to us intellectually-superior Atheists", etc. etc. etc. "
kudos. well said.
I'm not athiest. I'm a witch. I call to many gods and goddesses. And
they answer. Especially the guy with cloven-hoof and horns. He's my
favorite.
Samhain will be wonderful this year ... no doubt.
Carry on.
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: "Fundies" Vs. The Past, Present & Future... `~ |
04 Oct 2006 04:51:46 PM |
|
|
Come on Minny you know Fundies are they are the real Sentimentalists
they want Yestertday every day, worse yet they think, God would want to
know them.
You know how is he is with Killjoys
Take a look at yourself in a mirror, Yes even a Gila monster would
puke.
LB
The only difference is the clothes they wear peas in pod at each end of
the globe
Sun of our Sun wrote:
On 3 Oct 2006, wrote:
There is a tendency of atheists to try to link Christians and Jews with
violent muslims. Thus the term "fundamentalist" is used to cover for
all of them. But look at the severe violence demonstrated in atheistic
lands, such as the Soviet Union. Crimes against humanity. You could
call them "fundamentalist atheists". Fundamentalist athiests like to
demonize Christians and do so all the time.
Sgr A* wrote:
<snip>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Yes indeed, they sure do. Intolerance for the viewpoints
of non-Atheists is most self-evident among the hard-line
Atheists. And because they monopolized America's public
schools and courtrooms for so many decades now, they've
entirely lost the ability to conscientiously challenge
worldly so-called "authority". Neither can the Atheists
ever engage in substantive dialogue with non-Atheists,
most especially not with those of us who draw attention
to their myriads of abject blunders and bold-faced lies
which the Atheists are unable to convincingly defend, at
least not to individuals capable of independent thought.
As a result, they can only fall back on their trademark
ad hominem ad nauseam ad infinitum, e.g. "all Christians
are brain-dead morons", all "non-Atheists are inferior
to us intellectually-superior Atheists", etc. etc. etc.
That's okay. They can register their complaints with
St. Peter when they meet him at the Pearly Gates. :)
Enjoy!
Daniel Joseph Min
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
iQA/AwUBRSLFwJljD7YrHM/nEQIoVgCfWEK1hC+n/JoI4naXz/xLW6Mqkf8An0LW
qIzf5UT8Gsaf8qjSejhCs2mo
=//NW
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Cary Kittrell" |
|
| Title: Re: "Fundies" Vs. The Past, Present & Future... `~ |
04 Oct 2006 07:34:27 PM |
|
|
In article <Z31TSTVS38993.7278356481@twistycreek.com> Sun of our Sun <anon@comments.header> writes:
On 3 Oct 2006, wrote:
There is a tendency of atheists to try to link Christians and Jews with
violent muslims. Thus the term "fundamentalist" is used to cover for
all of them. But look at the severe violence demonstrated in atheistic
lands, such as the Soviet Union. Crimes against humanity. You could
call them "fundamentalist atheists". Fundamentalist athiests like to
demonize Christians and do so all the time.
Sgr A* wrote:
<snip>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Yes indeed, they sure do. Intolerance for the viewpoints
of non-Atheists is most self-evident among the hard-line
Atheists. And because they monopolized America's public
schools and courtrooms for so many decades now, they've
entirely lost the ability to conscientiously challenge
worldly so-called "authority". Neither can the Atheists
ever engage in substantive dialogue with non-Atheists,
Well, goodness, let's rectify that right this minute!
Substantive dialogue you shall have.
Let's start with this substantial question: if atheists have
"monopolized America's public schools" for "so many decades",
then tens of thousands of teachers must have stood in
front of their classes, year after year after year,
and drilled "There is no God. God does not exist"
into their charges' little heads.
Out of those tens of thousands of instances, can you list...oh,
let's just say six... six documented cases of this heinous violation
of our beloved Constitution for me? Such specific examples would
form a fine jumping-off point for more substantive discussion.
Here, please use this space:
1)
2)
3)
4)
5)
6)
-- cary
.
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
