| Topic: |
Religions > Atheism |
| User: |
"James Powell" |
| Date: |
31 Jul 2006 06:00:07 PM |
| Object: |
Re: Gene pools slime pools & plain fools |
"Jd" <ZionsFire@att.net> wrote in message
news:moiqc25t0fkd8fjkf2gfpp1uo4k0giv0jn@4ax.com...
Since I have X-NoArchive on, I thought it best for the newcomers here
to re-post my original message that started all this.
Why not just archive your post instead of wasting bandwidth reposting the
same drivel? Do you really think any responses are going to be different?
James Powell
.
|
|
| User: "Jd" |
|
| Title: Re: Gene pools slime pools & plain fools |
11 Aug 2006 09:26:41 PM |
|
|
James Powell wrote:
"Jd" <ZionsFire@att.net> wrote in message
news:moiqc25t0fkd8fjkf2gfpp1uo4k0giv0jn@4ax.com...
Since I have X-NoArchive on, I thought it best for the newcomers here
to re-post my original message that started all this.
Why not just archive your post instead of wasting bandwidth reposting the
same drivel? Do you really think any responses are going to be different?
James Powell
Don't worry about what I do, why I do it, when I do it, or to whom I
do it to.
I'm perfectly happy exercising my liberties here. In fact, I'm
perfectly happy period.
You OTOH are doomed to fret. Doomed to worry. Doomed to frustration.
You cannot deal with the very science you claim to profess. You and
those like you are feminized, spineless casualties of any Jezbian who
happens to be within 2 meters of your current location.
You are a disgrace to your own race and gender and are encouraging the
destruction of the authoritative infrastructure of the society in
which you live.
If nothing else, you and those like you disprove beyond any doubt the
possibility that evolution should even be considered by anyone
anywhere as being even remotely possible given 1 to the 10 billionth
power more time than you claim it took to begin with.
One thing I will agree with you and you idjut pals about however
is..... that you very well did originate from the slime pits of the
earth.
So for the record, do you admit that human evolutonary theory may
actually be 1 million year in error as the scientific evidence I've
present here from Harvard and MIT scientists indicates or not?
If "not" explain why not or else you and I can simply continue getting
personal with each other and I might conclude that you need to know
how to keep from ending up in hell after you die.
Jd
.
|
|
|
| User: "James Powell" |
|
| Title: Re: Gene pools slime pools & plain fools |
12 Aug 2006 09:30:44 AM |
|
|
"Jd" <ZionsFire@att.net> wrote in message
news:p7lqd212qie3jpejvgf4fq9gm2uhufqo5g@4ax.com...
James Powell wrote:
"Jd" <ZionsFire@att.net> wrote in message
news:moiqc25t0fkd8fjkf2gfpp1uo4k0giv0jn@4ax.com...
Since I have X-NoArchive on, I thought it best for the newcomers here
to re-post my original message that started all this.
Why not just archive your post instead of wasting bandwidth reposting the
same drivel? Do you really think any responses are going to be different?
James Powell
Don't worry about what I do, why I do it, when I do it, or to whom I
do it to.
I don't worry. I just point out your stupidity.
I'm perfectly happy exercising my liberties here. In fact, I'm
perfectly happy period.
The incompetent usually are.
You OTOH are doomed to fret. Doomed to worry. Doomed to frustration.
You cannot deal with the very science you claim to profess. You and
those like you are feminized, spineless casualties of any Jezbian who
happens to be within 2 meters of your current location.
Doomed? I don't fret nor do I worry. I am not frustrated in any sense of the
world. I understand science much better than you or your ilk ever could.
Since 'feminized' is a sociological concept that I reject, your statement is
meaningless. As for spineless, well I am sitting upright in my chair, so I
guess that spine is still there. (BTW - 'Spineless' is someone afraid to
have their posts archived). Since Jezbian appears to have meaning to only
you, my only reply is 'whatever, dude'.
You are a disgrace to your own race and gender and are encouraging the
destruction of the authoritative infrastructure of the society in
which you live.
Damn, I'm good!
I don't believ in the concept of 'race', so I can hardly betray "mine". I
have yet to have any males say I am a disgrace, so I have to discount that
particular statement from you. After all, it isn't like you represent ANY
gender on this planet! Challenging authority is always healthy. If authority
cannot adequately demonstrate it is correct, it should be overthrown. What
is that document you keep trying to say represents America? Oh. yeah.
"When in the Course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people to
dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another ..."
If nothing else, you and those like you disprove beyond any doubt the
possibility that evolution should even be considered by anyone
anywhere as being even remotely possible given 1 to the 10 billionth
power more time than you claim it took to begin with.
Someone get a doctor for this poor tortured sentence! Did you have a thought
here, Jd, or just rambling?
One thing I will agree with you and you idjut pals about however
is..... that you very well did originate from the slime pits of the
earth.
Last time I checked, there were no 'slime pits' on Earth, nor have there
ever been.
So for the record, do you admit that human evolutonary theory may
actually be 1 million year in error as the scientific evidence I've
present here from Harvard and MIT scientists indicates or not?
Your statement has no meaning. you have no understanding of the paper or
what it means. It is an interesting study that has implications for how we
have thought of evoutionary processes. however, it does nothing to 'damage'
evolutionary theory or affect the fact of evolution. It will go down as, at
best, a minor footnote in the theory.
If "not" explain why not or else you and I can simply continue getting
personal with each other and I might conclude that you need to know
how to keep from ending up in hell after you die.
Jd
Since I do not believe in hell, I have no need to hear from you on that
subject. As for Hell, I do not plan to be buried there so I doubt I will end
up there after I die.
If you really want, I can put in my will that my ashes should be taken to
Hell after I am cremated. Will that make you happy? Since I will be dead, I
really won't care.
James Powell
.
|
|
|
| User: "James Powell" |
|
| Title: Re: Gene pools slime pools & plain fools |
13 Aug 2006 08:23:07 AM |
|
|
"Jd" <ZionsFire@att.net> wrote in message
news:2aitd21sfmnfuhh6g33i0ikku8e7096lj8@4ax.com...
James Powell wrote:
"Jd" <ZionsFire@att.net> wrote in message
news:p7lqd212qie3jpejvgf4fq9gm2uhufqo5g@4ax.com...
Don't worry about what I do, why I do it, when I do it, or to whom I
do it to.
I don't worry. I just point out your stupidity.
All you do is create thread drift to get everyones attention off of
how bad I'm making evolutionists look.
Jd
Thread drift? You have yet to show you have a point to 'drift' away from!
James Powell
.
|
|
|
| User: "Jd" |
|
| Title: Re: Gene pools slime pools & plain fools |
14 Aug 2006 05:44:21 PM |
|
|
James Powell wrote:
"Jd" <ZionsFire@att.net> wrote in message
news:2aitd21sfmnfuhh6g33i0ikku8e7096lj8@4ax.com...
James Powell wrote:
"Jd" <ZionsFire@att.net> wrote in message
news:p7lqd212qie3jpejvgf4fq9gm2uhufqo5g@4ax.com...
Don't worry about what I do, why I do it, when I do it, or to whom I
do it to.
I don't worry. I just point out your stupidity.
All you do is create thread drift to get everyones attention off of
how bad I'm making evolutionists look.
Jd
Thread drift? You have yet to show you have a point to 'drift' away from!
James Powell
What? You forgot the 1 million year error of evolutionists I exposed
already? Even though I posted it twince since I've no Xarchive?
Perhaps I should repost it again.
Jd
.
|
|
|
| User: "James Powell" |
|
| Title: Re: Gene pools slime pools & plain fools |
15 Aug 2006 05:23:35 PM |
|
|
"Jd" <ZionsFire@att.net> wrote in message
news:ga32e2tmnbq0tdq1eg6c5uqva2otfo4jek@4ax.com...
James Powell wrote:
"Jd" <ZionsFire@att.net> wrote in message
news:2aitd21sfmnfuhh6g33i0ikku8e7096lj8@4ax.com...
James Powell wrote:
"Jd" <ZionsFire@att.net> wrote in message
news:p7lqd212qie3jpejvgf4fq9gm2uhufqo5g@4ax.com...
Don't worry about what I do, why I do it, when I do it, or to whom I
do it to.
I don't worry. I just point out your stupidity.
All you do is create thread drift to get everyones attention off of
how bad I'm making evolutionists look.
Jd
Thread drift? You have yet to show you have a point to 'drift' away from!
James Powell
What? You forgot the 1 million year error of evolutionists I exposed
already? Even though I posted it twince since I've no Xarchive?
Perhaps I should repost it again.
Jd
Was there suppose to be a point in that tripe? There is no "1 million year
error", except in the minds of those who do not understand evolutionary
theory. It is a minor footnote that may have some minor importance in the
grand scheme of things. Nothing unusual or earthshattering, just, at best, a
minor readjustment of theoretical ideas.
James Powell
.
|
|
|
| User: "Jd" |
|
| Title: Re: Gene pools slime pools & plain fools |
16 Aug 2006 05:32:28 PM |
|
|
James Powell wrote:
"Jd" <ZionsFire@att.net> wrote in message
news:ga32e2tmnbq0tdq1eg6c5uqva2otfo4jek@4ax.com...
James Powell wrote:
"Jd" <ZionsFire@att.net> wrote in message
news:2aitd21sfmnfuhh6g33i0ikku8e7096lj8@4ax.com...
James Powell wrote:
"Jd" <ZionsFire@att.net> wrote in message
news:p7lqd212qie3jpejvgf4fq9gm2uhufqo5g@4ax.com...
Don't worry about what I do, why I do it, when I do it, or to whom I
do it to.
I don't worry. I just point out your stupidity.
All you do is create thread drift to get everyones attention off of
how bad I'm making evolutionists look.
Jd
Thread drift? You have yet to show you have a point to 'drift' away from!
James Powell
What? You forgot the 1 million year error of evolutionists I exposed
already? Even though I posted it twince since I've no Xarchive?
Perhaps I should repost it again.
Jd
Was there suppose to be a point in that tripe? There is no "1 million year
error", except in the minds of those who do not understand evolutionary
theory. It is a minor footnote that may have some minor importance in the
grand scheme of things. Nothing unusual or earthshattering, just, at best, a
minor readjustment of theoretical ideas.
James Powell
Nevermind.
Here's another point. Think of the complications invloved in getting
the general public to accept that the reason transitional critters
don't exist in the fossil record (which plagued Darwin' mind on top of
all that witchcraft he was subjuected to) is because they were all
hybrids and died off. Yeah... millions upon millions of hybrids
appeared for every creature on earth as they all "evolved"... and
there is no fossil record to speak of.
How slick.
------Why Intermediate Forms Are Rarely Found-----
"As discussed earlier in this paper, Darwin considered the general
absence of forms intermediate between species to be a difficulty with
his theory of speciation. I pointed out that his defense of the theory
lay mainly in explaining why the data did not exist rather than
convincing the reader that intermediate forms ever did exist. The
mechanism of speciation by selection against the hybrids provides a
more direct answer as to why intermediate forms generally do not exist
between species."
http://www.iorg.com/speciation.html#Modern%20Theory%20Natural%20Selection
Jd
.
|
|
|
| User: "James Powell" |
|
| Title: Re: Gene pools slime pools & plain fools |
20 Aug 2006 05:38:23 PM |
|
|
"Jd" <ZionsFire@att.net> wrote in message
news:vgc7e2lro4ldlesk4cechb7vs7jgfo976l@4ax.com...
James Powell wrote:
"Jd" <ZionsFire@att.net> wrote in message
news:ga32e2tmnbq0tdq1eg6c5uqva2otfo4jek@4ax.com...
James Powell wrote:
"Jd" <ZionsFire@att.net> wrote in message
news:2aitd21sfmnfuhh6g33i0ikku8e7096lj8@4ax.com...
James Powell wrote:
"Jd" <ZionsFire@att.net> wrote in message
news:p7lqd212qie3jpejvgf4fq9gm2uhufqo5g@4ax.com...
Don't worry about what I do, why I do it, when I do it, or to whom I
do it to.
I don't worry. I just point out your stupidity.
All you do is create thread drift to get everyones attention off of
how bad I'm making evolutionists look.
Jd
Thread drift? You have yet to show you have a point to 'drift' away
from!
James Powell
What? You forgot the 1 million year error of evolutionists I exposed
already? Even though I posted it twince since I've no Xarchive?
Perhaps I should repost it again.
Jd
Was there suppose to be a point in that tripe? There is no "1 million year
error", except in the minds of those who do not understand evolutionary
theory. It is a minor footnote that may have some minor importance in the
grand scheme of things. Nothing unusual or earthshattering, just, at best,
a
minor readjustment of theoretical ideas.
James Powell
Nevermind.
Here's another point. Think of the complications invloved in getting
the general public to accept that the reason transitional critters
don't exist in the fossil record (which plagued Darwin' mind on top of
all that witchcraft he was subjuected to) is because they were all
hybrids and died off. Yeah... millions upon millions of hybrids
appeared for every creature on earth as they all "evolved"... and
there is no fossil record to speak of.
How slick.
------Why Intermediate Forms Are Rarely Found-----
"As discussed earlier in this paper, Darwin considered the general
absence of forms intermediate between species to be a difficulty with
his theory of speciation. I pointed out that his defense of the theory
lay mainly in explaining why the data did not exist rather than
convincing the reader that intermediate forms ever did exist. The
mechanism of speciation by selection against the hybrids provides a
more direct answer as to why intermediate forms generally do not exist
between species."
http://www.iorg.com/speciation.html#Modern%20Theory%20Natural%20Selection
Jd
How many times does it have to explained to you that this paper does not
support your position? Are you really that stupid?
Hybrids are a minor consideration in the formation of species. There are
many other mechanisms that do not rely on hybridization.
Intermediates are found in the fossil records. In fact, we have entire
speciation events in the fossil record.
James Powell
.
|
|
|
| User: "Jd" |
|
| Title: Re: Gene pools slime pools & plain fools |
09 Sep 2006 07:53:13 PM |
|
|
James Powell wrote:
"Jd" <ZionsFire@att.net> wrote in message
news:vgc7e2lro4ldlesk4cechb7vs7jgfo976l@4ax.com...
James Powell wrote:
"Jd" <ZionsFire@att.net> wrote in message
news:ga32e2tmnbq0tdq1eg6c5uqva2otfo4jek@4ax.com...
James Powell wrote:
"Jd" <ZionsFire@att.net> wrote in message
news:2aitd21sfmnfuhh6g33i0ikku8e7096lj8@4ax.com...
James Powell wrote:
"Jd" <ZionsFire@att.net> wrote in message
news:p7lqd212qie3jpejvgf4fq9gm2uhufqo5g@4ax.com...
Don't worry about what I do, why I do it, when I do it, or to whom I
do it to.
I don't worry. I just point out your stupidity.
All you do is create thread drift to get everyones attention off of
how bad I'm making evolutionists look.
Jd
Thread drift? You have yet to show you have a point to 'drift' away
from!
James Powell
What? You forgot the 1 million year error of evolutionists I exposed
already? Even though I posted it twince since I've no Xarchive?
Perhaps I should repost it again.
Jd
Was there suppose to be a point in that tripe? There is no "1 million year
error", except in the minds of those who do not understand evolutionary
theory. It is a minor footnote that may have some minor importance in the
grand scheme of things. Nothing unusual or earthshattering, just, at best,
a
minor readjustment of theoretical ideas.
James Powell
Nevermind.
Here's another point. Think of the complications invloved in getting
the general public to accept that the reason transitional critters
don't exist in the fossil record (which plagued Darwin' mind on top of
all that witchcraft he was subjuected to) is because they were all
hybrids and died off. Yeah... millions upon millions of hybrids
appeared for every creature on earth as they all "evolved"... and
there is no fossil record to speak of.
How slick.
------Why Intermediate Forms Are Rarely Found-----
"As discussed earlier in this paper, Darwin considered the general
absence of forms intermediate between species to be a difficulty with
his theory of speciation. I pointed out that his defense of the theory
lay mainly in explaining why the data did not exist rather than
convincing the reader that intermediate forms ever did exist. The
mechanism of speciation by selection against the hybrids provides a
more direct answer as to why intermediate forms generally do not exist
between species."
http://www.iorg.com/speciation.html#Modern%20Theory%20Natural%20Selection
Jd
How many times does it have to explained to you that this paper does not
support your position? Are you really that stupid?
Hybrids are a minor consideration in the formation of species. There are
many other mechanisms that do not rely on hybridization.
Intermediates are found in the fossil records. In fact, we have entire
speciation events in the fossil record.
James Powell
We have nothing in the fossile record which proves human evolution.
In fact, it should be a crime to teach human evolution as science to
our children in our schools without giving them the opportunity to
also learn about creationism.
But your cult won't allow it.
Cult's operate that way.
You operate that way.
I don't.
And that's what infutiates you and those of your cult. You can't
control me and those like me.
So make it easy on yourself and just forget it.
I and those like me are the most advanced humans which tread upon the
earth. You are fighting a lost evoultionary battle against superior
beings my friend.
2Co 5:17 Therefore if any man be in Christ, he is a new
creature: old things are passed away; behold, all things are become
new.
Now. If evolution were in fact true... why would it empower it's
subjects with the knowledge of religion which destroys it?
You idjut.
Jd
.
|
|
|
| User: "James Powell" |
|
| Title: Re: Gene pools slime pools & plain fools |
10 Sep 2006 08:21:20 AM |
|
|
"Jd" <ZionsFire@att.net> wrote in message
news:23v6g2tsi81tnfne0c5q3ggrll9etc10d9@4ax.com...
James Powell wrote:
"Jd" <ZionsFire@att.net> wrote in message
<snip>
http://www.iorg.com/speciation.html#Modern%20Theory%20Natural%20Selection
Jd
How many times does it have to explained to you that this paper does not
support your position? Are you really that stupid?
Hybrids are a minor consideration in the formation of species. There are
many other mechanisms that do not rely on hybridization.
Intermediates are found in the fossil records. In fact, we have entire
speciation events in the fossil record.
James Powell
We have nothing in the fossile record which proves human evolution.
Incorrect. We have comparative genetic studies.
In fact, it should be a crime to teach human evolution as science to
our children in our schools without giving them the opportunity to
also learn about creationism.
Your opinion, not a fact. Fact is, the children can be taught all they want
to know about creationism, just not in public school.
But your cult won't allow it.
Creationism is not science. Therefore, it does not belong in a science
classroom.
Cult's operate that way.
Equality works that way. All religions are equal in a public education
system.
You operate that way.
Because I believe all religions are equally invalid.
I don't.
Exactly. You believe in freedom only for those who follow your exact
ideology.
And that's what infutiates you and those of your cult. You can't
control me and those like me.
Personally, I would rather iradicate your ilk. Hoever, that is the price of
freedom.
So make it easy on yourself and just forget it.
Sorry, no. I will defend scientific thought from barbarians like you
forever.
I and those like me are the most advanced humans which tread upon the
earth. You are fighting a lost evoultionary battle against superior
beings my friend.
Sorry, your superiority is very overrated. You are actually well behind
those that live today.
2Co 5:17 Therefore if any man be in Christ, he is a new
creature: old things are passed away; behold, all things are become
new.
Now. If evolution were in fact true... why would it empower it's
subjects with the knowledge of religion which destroys it?
It is the other way around. Critical thinking is the most dangerous weapon
that religion has ever faced.
James Powell
.
|
|
|
| User: "Jd" |
|
| Title: Re: Gene pools slime pools & plain fools |
15 Sep 2006 09:14:07 PM |
|
|
James Powell wrote:
"Jd" <ZionsFire@att.net> wrote in message
news:23v6g2tsi81tnfne0c5q3ggrll9etc10d9@4ax.com...
James Powell wrote:
"Jd" <ZionsFire@att.net> wrote in message
<snip>
http://www.iorg.com/speciation.html#Modern%20Theory%20Natural%20Selection
Jd
How many times does it have to explained to you that this paper does not
support your position? Are you really that stupid?
Hybrids are a minor consideration in the formation of species. There are
many other mechanisms that do not rely on hybridization.
Intermediates are found in the fossil records. In fact, we have entire
speciation events in the fossil record.
James Powell
We have nothing in the fossile record which proves human evolution.
Incorrect. We have comparative genetic studies.
Incorrect. Human evolution has never been proven.
You are a deceiver, a liar, a sidestepper, and a contorter of truth.
Jd
"Verily, verily, I say unto thee, Except a man be born again, he
cannot see the kingdom of God." - Jesus Christ (John 3:3)
.
|
|
|
| User: "James Powell" |
|
| Title: Re: Gene pools slime pools & plain fools |
16 Sep 2006 09:48:31 AM |
|
|
"Jd" <ZionsFire@att.net> wrote in message
news:q0vmg2lfal0a32rv1075a6e6qdvfisbbtp@4ax.com...
James Powell wrote:
"Jd" <ZionsFire@att.net> wrote in message
news:23v6g2tsi81tnfne0c5q3ggrll9etc10d9@4ax.com...
James Powell wrote:
"Jd" <ZionsFire@att.net> wrote in message
<snip>
http://www.iorg.com/speciation.html#Modern%20Theory%20Natural%20Selection
Jd
How many times does it have to explained to you that this paper does not
support your position? Are you really that stupid?
Hybrids are a minor consideration in the formation of species. There are
many other mechanisms that do not rely on hybridization.
Intermediates are found in the fossil records. In fact, we have entire
speciation events in the fossil record.
James Powell
We have nothing in the fossile record which proves human evolution.
Incorrect. We have comparative genetic studies.
Incorrect. Human evolution has never been proven.
Please show you even understand what a comparative genetic study is.
Science does not 'prove' anything, nor does it need to.
You are a deceiver, a liar, a sidestepper, and a contorter of truth.
You are a buffoon.
James Powell
Jd
"Verily, verily, I say unto thee, Except a man be born again, he
cannot see the kingdom of God." - Jesus Christ (John 3:3)
.
|
|
|
| User: "Jd" |
|
| Title: Re: Gene pools slime pools & plain fools |
19 Sep 2006 07:26:15 PM |
|
|
James Powell wrote:
"Jd" <ZionsFire@att.net> wrote in message
news:q0vmg2lfal0a32rv1075a6e6qdvfisbbtp@4ax.com...
James Powell wrote:
"Jd" <ZionsFire@att.net> wrote in message
news:23v6g2tsi81tnfne0c5q3ggrll9etc10d9@4ax.com...
James Powell wrote:
"Jd" <ZionsFire@att.net> wrote in message
<snip>
http://www.iorg.com/speciation.html#Modern%20Theory%20Natural%20Selection
Jd
How many times does it have to explained to you that this paper does not
support your position? Are you really that stupid?
Hybrids are a minor consideration in the formation of species. There are
many other mechanisms that do not rely on hybridization.
Intermediates are found in the fossil records. In fact, we have entire
speciation events in the fossil record.
James Powell
We have nothing in the fossile record which proves human evolution.
Incorrect. We have comparative genetic studies.
Incorrect. Human evolution has never been proven.
Please show you even understand what a comparative genetic study is.
Science does not 'prove' anything, nor does it need to.
Your "science" has been proven to be full of assumptions.
"We can use the mathematics of natural selection to show how two
populations with known alleles and known but differing selection
pressures would diverge. But we can use the same mathematics to show
how they would recombine. The mathematics of natural selection cannot
tell us whether or not the two populations upon recombining will
become two species or remain one. In order to answer that question we
must make additional assumptions about the selection pressures against
the hybrids, and those are assumptions about the environment not about
the intrinsic population dynamics."
http://www.iorg.com/speciation.html#Modern%20Theory%20Natural%20Selection
You are a deceiver, a liar, a sidestepper, and a contorter of truth.
You are a buffoon.
James Powell
I might possibly accept your apology if you catch me on a good day.
Jd
"For the word of God is quick, and powerful, and sharper than any
twoedged sword, piercing even to the dividing asunder of soul and
spirit, and of the joints and marrow, and is a discerner of the
thoughts and intents of the heart." (Hebrews 4:12)
.
|
|
|
| User: "James Powell" |
|
| Title: Re: Gene pools slime pools & plain fools |
23 Sep 2006 08:18:29 AM |
|
|
"Jd" <ZionsFire@att.net> wrote in message
news:ij51h21s4vrgapts0d63uor32ov3ec277d@4ax.com...
James Powell wrote:
"Jd" <ZionsFire@att.net> wrote in message
news:q0vmg2lfal0a32rv1075a6e6qdvfisbbtp@4ax.com...
James Powell wrote:
"Jd" <ZionsFire@att.net> wrote in message
news:23v6g2tsi81tnfne0c5q3ggrll9etc10d9@4ax.com...
James Powell wrote:
"Jd" <ZionsFire@att.net> wrote in message
<snip - repeated below!>
We have nothing in the fossile record which proves human evolution.
Incorrect. We have comparative genetic studies.
Incorrect. Human evolution has never been proven.
Please show you even understand what a comparative genetic study is.
Science does not 'prove' anything, nor does it need to.
Your "science" has been proven to be full of assumptions.
"We can use the mathematics of natural selection to show how two
populations with known alleles and known but differing selection
pressures would diverge. But we can use the same mathematics to show
how they would recombine. The mathematics of natural selection cannot
tell us whether or not the two populations upon recombining will
become two species or remain one. In order to answer that question we
must make additional assumptions about the selection pressures against
the hybrids, and those are assumptions about the environment not about
the intrinsic population dynamics."
http://www.iorg.com/speciation.html#Modern%20Theory%20Natural%20Selection
Isn't this where we started? (From <snip> above)
How many times does it have to explained to you that this paper does
not
support your position? Are you really that stupid?
Hybrids are a minor consideration in the formation of species. There
are
many other mechanisms that do not rely on hybridization.
Intermediates are found in the fossil records. In fact, we have entire
speciation events in the fossil record.
You are a deceiver, a liar, a sidestepper, and a contorter of truth.
You are a buffoon.
James Powell
I might possibly accept your apology if you catch me on a good day.
And pigs will be flying on that day as well.
James Powell
.
|
|
|
| User: "Cary Kittrell" |
|
| Title: Re: Gene pools slime pools & plain fools |
25 Sep 2006 12:08:36 PM |
|
|
"James Powell" <someone@anywhere.com> writes:
"Jd" <ZionsFire@att.net> wrote in message
news:ij51h21s4vrgapts0d63uor32ov3ec277d@4ax.com...
James Powell wrote:
"Jd" <ZionsFire@att.net> wrote in message
news:q0vmg2lfal0a32rv1075a6e6qdvfisbbtp@4ax.com...
James Powell wrote:
"Jd" <ZionsFire@att.net> wrote in message
news:23v6g2tsi81tnfne0c5q3ggrll9etc10d9@4ax.com...
James Powell wrote:
"Jd" <ZionsFire@att.net> wrote in message
<snip - repeated below!>
We have nothing in the fossile record which proves human evolution.
Incorrect. We have comparative genetic studies.
Incorrect. Human evolution has never been proven.
Please show you even understand what a comparative genetic study is.
Science does not 'prove' anything, nor does it need to.
Your "science" has been proven to be full of assumptions.
"We can use the mathematics of natural selection to show how two
populations with known alleles and known but differing selection
pressures would diverge. But we can use the same mathematics to show
how they would recombine. The mathematics of natural selection cannot
tell us whether or not the two populations upon recombining will
become two species or remain one. In order to answer that question we
must make additional assumptions about the selection pressures against
the hybrids, and those are assumptions about the environment not about
the intrinsic population dynamics."
http://www.iorg.com/speciation.html#Modern%20Theory%20Natural%20Selection
Isn't this where we started? (From <snip> above)
How many times does it have to explained to you that this paper does
not
support your position? Are you really that stupid?
Hybrids are a minor consideration in the formation of species. There
are
many other mechanisms that do not rely on hybridization.
Intermediates are found in the fossil records. In fact, we have entire
speciation events in the fossil record.
You are a deceiver, a liar, a sidestepper, and a contorter of truth.
You are a buffoon.
James Powell
I might possibly accept your apology if you catch me on a good day.
And pigs will be flying on that day as well.
Oh, we have the "flying" part pretty well worked out now. It's
the "landing" part that's giving us problems.
-- cary
.
|
|
|
| User: "Gray Shockley" |
|
| Title: Re: Gene pools slime pools & plain fools |
25 Sep 2006 03:59:38 PM |
|
|
On Mon, 25 Sep 2006 12:08:36 -0500, Cary Kittrell wrote
(in article <ef92ek$7ck$1@onion.ccit.arizona.edu>):
"James Powell" <someone@anywhere.com> writes:
"Jd" <ZionsFire@att.net> wrote in message
news:ij51h21s4vrgapts0d63uor32ov3ec277d@4ax.com...
James Powell wrote:
"Jd" <ZionsFire@att.net> wrote in message
news:q0vmg2lfal0a32rv1075a6e6qdvfisbbtp@4ax.com...
James Powell wrote:
"Jd" <ZionsFire@att.net> wrote in message
news:23v6g2tsi81tnfne0c5q3ggrll9etc10d9@4ax.com...
James Powell wrote:
"Jd" <ZionsFire@att.net> wrote in message
<snip - repeated below!>
We have nothing in the fossile record which proves human evolution.
Incorrect. We have comparative genetic studies.
Incorrect. Human evolution has never been proven.
Please show you even understand what a comparative genetic study is.
Science does not 'prove' anything, nor does it need to.
Your "science" has been proven to be full of assumptions.
"We can use the mathematics of natural selection to show how two
populations with known alleles and known but differing selection
pressures would diverge. But we can use the same mathematics to show
how they would recombine. The mathematics of natural selection cannot
tell us whether or not the two populations upon recombining will
become two species or remain one. In order to answer that question we
must make additional assumptions about the selection pressures against
the hybrids, and those are assumptions about the environment not about
the intrinsic population dynamics."
http://www.iorg.com/speciation.html#Modern%20Theory%20Natural%20Selection
Isn't this where we started? (From <snip> above)
How many times does it have to explained to you that this paper does
not
support your position? Are you really that stupid?
Hybrids are a minor consideration in the formation of species. There
are
many other mechanisms that do not rely on hybridization.
Intermediates are found in the fossil records. In fact, we have entire
speciation events in the fossil record.
You are a deceiver, a liar, a sidestepper, and a contorter of truth.
You are a buffoon.
James Powell
I might possibly accept your apology if you catch me on a good day.
And pigs will be flying on that day as well.
Oh, we have the "flying" part pretty well worked out now. It's
the "landing" part that's giving us problems.
-- cary
There's a reason they call it "NetZero". / gray /
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Jd" |
|
| Title: Re: Gene pools slime pools & plain fools |
26 Sep 2006 05:32:43 PM |
|
|
James Powell wrote:
"Jd" <ZionsFire@att.net> wrote in message
news:ij51h21s4vrgapts0d63uor32ov3ec277d@4ax.com...
James Powell wrote:
"Jd" <ZionsFire@att.net> wrote in message
news:q0vmg2lfal0a32rv1075a6e6qdvfisbbtp@4ax.com...
James Powell wrote:
"Jd" <ZionsFire@att.net> wrote in message
news:23v6g2tsi81tnfne0c5q3ggrll9etc10d9@4ax.com...
James Powell wrote:
"Jd" <ZionsFire@att.net> wrote in message
<snip - repeated below!>
We have nothing in the fossile record which proves human evolution.
Incorrect. We have comparative genetic studies.
Incorrect. Human evolution has never been proven.
Please show you even understand what a comparative genetic study is.
Science does not 'prove' anything, nor does it need to.
Your "science" has been proven to be full of assumptions.
"We can use the mathematics of natural selection to show how two
populations with known alleles and known but differing selection
pressures would diverge. But we can use the same mathematics to show
how they would recombine. The mathematics of natural selection cannot
tell us whether or not the two populations upon recombining will
become two species or remain one. In order to answer that question we
must make additional assumptions about the selection pressures against
the hybrids, and those are assumptions about the environment not about
the intrinsic population dynamics."
http://www.iorg.com/speciation.html#Modern%20Theory%20Natural%20Selection
Isn't this where we started? (From <snip> above)
How many times does it have to explained to you that this paper does
not
support your position? Are you really that stupid?
Hybrids are a minor consideration in the formation of species. There
are
many other mechanisms that do not rely on hybridization.
Intermediates are found in the fossil records. In fact, we have entire
speciation events in the fossil record.
You are a deceiver, a liar, a sidestepper, and a contorter of truth.
You are a buffoon.
James Powell
I might possibly accept your apology if you catch me on a good day.
And pigs will be flying on that day as well.
James Powell
What? I'm not asking you to repent of all your sins, just to apologize for your
unruly behaviour.
Jd
.
|
|
|
| User: "James Powell" |
|
| Title: Re: Gene pools slime pools & plain fools |
30 Sep 2006 09:46:12 AM |
|
|
"Jd" <ZionsFire@att.net> wrote in message
news:vugjh2hu9rtr6v2e5aboen90gd8puqs53h@4ax.com...
James Powell wrote:
"Jd" <ZionsFire@att.net> wrote in message
news:ij51h21s4vrgapts0d63uor32ov3ec277d@4ax.com...
James Powell wrote:
"Jd" <ZionsFire@att.net> wrote in message
news:q0vmg2lfal0a32rv1075a6e6qdvfisbbtp@4ax.com...
James Powell wrote:
"Jd" <ZionsFire@att.net> wrote in message
news:23v6g2tsi81tnfne0c5q3ggrll9etc10d9@4ax.com...
James Powell wrote:
"Jd" <ZionsFire@att.net> wrote in message
<snip - repeated below!>
We have nothing in the fossile record which proves human evolution.
Incorrect. We have comparative genetic studies.
Incorrect. Human evolution has never been proven.
Please show you even understand what a comparative genetic study is.
Science does not 'prove' anything, nor does it need to.
Your "science" has been proven to be full of assumptions.
"We can use the mathematics of natural selection to show how two
populations with known alleles and known but differing selection
pressures would diverge. But we can use the same mathematics to show
how they would recombine. The mathematics of natural selection cannot
tell us whether or not the two populations upon recombining will
become two species or remain one. In order to answer that question we
must make additional assumptions about the selection pressures against
the hybrids, and those are assumptions about the environment not about
the intrinsic population dynamics."
http://www.iorg.com/speciation.html#Modern%20Theory%20Natural%20Selection
Isn't this where we started? (From <snip> above)
How many times does it have to explained to you that this paper does
not
support your position? Are you really that stupid?
Hybrids are a minor consideration in the formation of species. There
are
many other mechanisms that do not rely on hybridization.
Intermediates are found in the fossil records. In fact, we have
entire
speciation events in the fossil record.
You are a deceiver, a liar, a sidestepper, and a contorter of truth.
You are a buffoon.
James Powell
I might possibly accept your apology if you catch me on a good day.
And pigs will be flying on that day as well.
James Powell
What? I'm not asking you to repent of all your sins, just to apologize for
your
unruly behaviour.
Jd
I see no reason to apologize to a willfully ignorant moron. Furthermore, I
have nothing to apologize to you about.
James Powell
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Adam Whyte-Settlar" |
|
| Title: Re: Gene pools slime pools & plain fools |
15 Sep 2006 09:47:52 PM |
|
|
"Jd" <ZionsFire@att.net> wrote in message
news:q0vmg2lfal0a32rv1075a6e6qdvfisbbtp@4ax.com...
James Powell wrote:
"Jd" <ZionsFire@att.net> wrote in message
news:23v6g2tsi81tnfne0c5q3ggrll9etc10d9@4ax.com...
James Powell wrote:
"Jd" <ZionsFire@att.net> wrote in message
<snip>
http://www.iorg.com/speciation.html#Modern%20Theory%20Natural%20Selection
Jd
How many times does it have to explained to you that this paper does not
support your position? Are you really that stupid?
Hybrids are a minor consideration in the formation of species. There are
many other mechanisms that do not rely on hybridization.
Intermediates are found in the fossil records. In fact, we have entire
speciation events in the fossil record.
James Powell
We have nothing in the fossile record which proves human evolution.
Incorrect. We have comparative genetic studies.
Incorrect. Human evolution has never been proven.
Neither has the existence of Christ.
Cheer up though - in some parts of the USA more people believe they have
been abducted by aliens than believe in evolution. That's got to be progress
eh?
A W-S
.
|
|
|
| User: "Jd" |
|
| Title: Re: Gene pools slime pools & plain fools |
15 Sep 2006 11:49:27 PM |
|
|
Adam Whyte-Settlar wrote:
"Jd" <ZionsFire@att.net> wrote in message
news:q0vmg2lfal0a32rv1075a6e6qdvfisbbtp@4ax.com...
James Powell wrote:
"Jd" <ZionsFire@att.net> wrote in message
news:23v6g2tsi81tnfne0c5q3ggrll9etc10d9@4ax.com...
James Powell wrote:
"Jd" <ZionsFire@att.net> wrote in message
<snip>
http://www.iorg.com/speciation.html#Modern%20Theory%20Natural%20Selection
Jd
How many times does it have to explained to you that this paper does not
support your position? Are you really that stupid?
Hybrids are a minor consideration in the formation of species. There are
many other mechanisms that do not rely on hybridization.
Intermediates are found in the fossil records. In fact, we have entire
speciation events in the fossil record.
James Powell
We have nothing in the fossile record which proves human evolution.
Incorrect. We have comparative genetic studies.
Incorrect. Human evolution has never been proven.
Neither has the existence of Christ.
So evolution is also a religion. Yeah, I've been saying that for 20
years.
From the Biblical definition of "faith" we see that.
He 11:1 Now faith is the substance of things hoped for, the evidence
of things not seen.
Now Christianity has survived 20 centuries but "Evolution" barely 20
years.
Mathematically speaking, you don't have enough data points to
substantiate anything more than a fart in a whirlwind.
Also, you have mistakenly conjured up some notion that Christians are
all your doormat. You must've been pussified by some anti-male
feminist somewhere along the line.
Go wash them dishes, boy.
Jd
"Anno Domini Nostri Iesu Christi ("In the Year of Our Lord Jesus
Christ"), commonly shortened to Anno Domini ("In the Year of the
Lord"), abbreviated as AD or A.D., is the designation used to number
years in the Christian Era, conventionally used with the Julian and
Gregorian calendars. It defines an epoch based on the
traditionally-reckoned year of the birth of Jesus."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anno_Domini
.
|
|
|
| User: "Adam Whyte-Settlar" |
|
| Title: Re: Gene pools slime pools & plain fools |
16 Sep 2006 03:29:22 AM |
|
|
"Jd" <ZionsFire@att.net> wrote in message
news:9a7ng2dtmoksojl6jgiuun4ihuj1ufn0on@4ax.com...
Adam Whyte-Settlar wrote:
"Jd" <ZionsFire@att.net> wrote in message
news:q0vmg2lfal0a32rv1075a6e6qdvfisbbtp@4ax.com...
James Powell wrote:
"Jd" <ZionsFire@att.net> wrote in message
news:23v6g2tsi81tnfne0c5q3ggrll9etc10d9@4ax.com...
James Powell wrote:
"Jd" <ZionsFire@att.net> wrote in message
<snip>
http://www.iorg.com/speciation.html#Modern%20Theory%20Natural%20Selection
Jd
How many times does it have to explained to you that this paper does
not
support your position? Are you really that stupid?
Hybrids are a minor consideration in the formation of species. There
are
many other mechanisms that do not rely on hybridization.
Intermediates are found in the fossil records. In fact, we have entire
speciation events in the fossil record.
James Powell
We have nothing in the fossile record which proves human evolution.
Incorrect. We have comparative genetic studies.
Incorrect. Human evolution has never been proven.
Neither has the existence of Christ.
So evolution is also a religion. Yeah, I've been saying that for 20
years.
You might be saying that - I didn't.
I just pointed out a simple fact - that the existence of Christ has never
been catagorically proven.
Perhaps I misunderstood you but I got the impression you seem to think it an
important point when referring to evolution.....whats good for the goose.
A W-S
.
|
|
|
| User: "Jd" |
|
| Title: Re: Gene pools slime pools & plain fools |
19 Sep 2006 07:26:14 PM |
|
|
Adam Whyte-Settlar wrote:
"Jd" <ZionsFire@att.net> wrote in message
news:9a7ng2dtmoksojl6jgiuun4ihuj1ufn0on@4ax.com...
Adam Whyte-Settlar wrote:
"Jd" <ZionsFire@att.net> wrote in message
news:q0vmg2lfal0a32rv1075a6e6qdvfisbbtp@4ax.com...
James Powell wrote:
"Jd" <ZionsFire@att.net> wrote in message
news:23v6g2tsi81tnfne0c5q3ggrll9etc10d9@4ax.com...
James Powell wrote:
"Jd" <ZionsFire@att.net> wrote in message
<snip>
http://www.iorg.com/speciation.html#Modern%20Theory%20Natural%20Selection
Jd
How many times does it have to explained to you that this paper does
not
support your position? Are you really that stupid?
Hybrids are a minor consideration in the formation of species. There
are
many other mechanisms that do not rely on hybridization.
Intermediates are found in the fossil records. In fact, we have entire
speciation events in the fossil record.
James Powell
We have nothing in the fossile record which proves human evolution.
Incorrect. We have comparative genetic studies.
Incorrect. Human evolution has never been proven.
Neither has the existence of Christ.
So evolution is also a religion. Yeah, I've been saying that for 20
years.
You might be saying that - I didn't.
I just pointed out a simple fact - that the existence of Christ has never
been catagorically proven.
Perhaps I misunderstood you but I got the impression you seem to think it an
important point when referring to evolution.....whats good for the goose.
A W-S
So to clarify, are you agreeing with me that human evolution indeed
qualifies as a "religion" since there is no proof?
Jd
.
|
|
|
| User: "Adam Whyte-Settlar" |
|
| Title: Re: Gene pools slime pools & plain fools |
20 Sep 2006 09:44:25 AM |
|
|
"Jd" <ZionsFire@att.net> wrote in message
news:6d51h2tvmrbkf6f1h3qop47ff4r6frjamp@4ax.com...
Adam Whyte-Settlar wrote:
"Jd" <ZionsFire@att.net> wrote in message
news:9a7ng2dtmoksojl6jgiuun4ihuj1ufn0on@4ax.com...
Adam Whyte-Settlar wrote:
"Jd" <ZionsFire@att.net> wrote in message
news:q0vmg2lfal0a32rv1075a6e6qdvfisbbtp@4ax.com...
James Powell wrote:
"Jd" <ZionsFire@att.net> wrote in message
news:23v6g2tsi81tnfne0c5q3ggrll9etc10d9@4ax.com...
James Powell wrote:
"Jd" <ZionsFire@att.net> wrote in message
<snip>
http://www.iorg.com/speciation.html#Modern%20Theory%20Natural%20Selection
Jd
How many times does it have to explained to you that this paper does
not
support your position? Are you really that stupid?
Hybrids are a minor consideration in the formation of species. There
are
many other mechanisms that do not rely on hybridization.
Intermediates are found in the fossil records. In fact, we have
entire
speciation events in the fossil record.
James Powell
We have nothing in the fossile record which proves human evolution.
Incorrect. We have comparative genetic studies.
Incorrect. Human evolution has never been proven.
Neither has the existence of Christ.
So evolution is also a religion. Yeah, I've been saying that for 20
years.
You might be saying that - I didn't.
I just pointed out a simple fact - that the existence of Christ has never
been catagorically proven.
Perhaps I misunderstood you but I got the impression you seem to think it
an
important point when referring to evolution.....whats good for the goose.
A W-S
So to clarify, are you agreeing with me that human evolution indeed
qualifies as a "religion" since there is no proof?
No.
Though I would say that science and religion are related (personaly I see no
conflict) in that they are both branches of the greater trunk of Philosophy.
Philosophy I see as being the search for truth.
One day Science could well discover something they will have to label 'God'.
I have no problem in accepting that God created evolution - are you
suggesting you 'know' He couldn't have done so?
If so you have even bigger ego problems than I thought.
A W-S
.
|
|
|
| User: "Jd" |
|
| Title: Re: Gene pools slime pools & plain fools |
26 Sep 2006 05:32:43 PM |
|
|
Adam Whyte-Settlar wrote:
"Jd" <ZionsFire@att.net> wrote in message
news:6d51h2tvmrbkf6f1h3qop47ff4r6frjamp@4ax.com...
Adam Whyte-Settlar wrote:
"Jd" <ZionsFire@att.net> wrote in message
news:9a7ng2dtmoksojl6jgiuun4ihuj1ufn0on@4ax.com...
Adam Whyte-Settlar wrote:
"Jd" <ZionsFire@att.net> wrote in message
news:q0vmg2lfal0a32rv1075a6e6qdvfisbbtp@4ax.com...
James Powell wrote:
"Jd" <ZionsFire@att.net> wrote in message
news:23v6g2tsi81tnfne0c5q3ggrll9etc10d9@4ax.com...
James Powell wrote:
"Jd" <ZionsFire@att.net> wrote in message
<snip>
http://www.iorg.com/speciation.html#Modern%20Theory%20Natural%20Selection
Jd
How many times does it have to explained to you that this paper does
not
support your position? Are you really that stupid?
Hybrids are a minor consideration in the formation of species. There
are
many other mechanisms that do not rely on hybridization.
Intermediates are found in the fossil records. In fact, we have
entire
speciation events in the fossil record.
James Powell
We have nothing in the fossile record which proves human evolution.
Incorrect. We have comparative genetic studies.
Incorrect. Human evolution has never been proven.
Neither has the existence of Christ.
So evolution is also a religion. Yeah, I've been saying that for 20
years.
You might be saying that - I didn't.
I just pointed out a simple fact - that the existence of Christ has never
been catagorically proven.
Perhaps I misunderstood you but I got the impression you seem to think it
an
important point when referring to evolution.....whats good for the goose.
A W-S
So to clarify, are you agreeing with me that human evolution indeed
qualifies as a "religion" since there is no proof?
No.
Though I would say that science and religion are related (personaly I see no
conflict) in that they are both branches of the greater trunk of Philosophy.
Philosophy I see as being the search for truth.
One day Science could well discover something they will have to label 'God'.
I have no problem in accepting that God created evolution - are you
suggesting you 'know' He couldn't have done so?
If so you have even bigger ego problems than I thought.
A W-S
God did not create evolution.
Jesus Christ existed before the creation occurred and had no need to wait for
apes to evolve into a body for Him to inhabit.
In fact, for all practical purposes it can be stated that Jesus is actually the
"Creator".
Ephesians 3:8-9 "Unto me, who am less than the least of all saints, is this
grace given, that I should preach among the Gentiles the unsearchable riches of
Christ; And to make all men see what is the fellowship of the mystery, which
from the beginning of the world hath been hid in God, who created all things by
Jesus Christ"
All Jesus had to do was deny His deity and he would've escaped crucifixtion. But
he didn't.
"I and my Father are one".Then the Jews took up stones again to stone him.
Jesus answered them, "Many good works have I shewed you from my Father; for
which of those works do ye stone me?" The Jews answered him, saying, "For a good
work we stone thee not; but for blasphemy; and because that thou, being a man,
makest thyself God". (John 10:30-33)
Then came Jesus forth, wearing the crown of thorns, and the purple robe. And
Pilate saith unto them, "Behold the man!" When the chief priests therefore and
officers saw him, they cried out, saying, "Crucify him, crucify him". Pilate
saith unto them, "Take ye him, and crucify him: for I find no fault in him".
The Jews answered him, "We have a law, and by our law he ought to die, because
he made himself the Son of God". (John 19:5-7)
Jd
.
|
|
|
| User: "Adam Whyte-Settlar" |
|
| Title: Re: Gene pools slime pools & plain fools |
26 Sep 2006 09:22:43 PM |
|
|
"Jd" <ZionsFire@att.net> wrote in message
news:8bfjh2htahiebinm8j6080lo4dhevl912e@4ax.com...
..
One day Science could well discover something they will have to label
'God'.
I have no problem in accepting that God created evolution - are you
suggesting you 'know' He couldn't have done so?
If so you have even bigger ego problems than I thought.
A W-S
God did not create evolution.
Sure JD - you know better than God.
[backs away slowly]
Jesus Christ existed before the creation occurred
Actually JD - there are no contempory records or evidence whatsover that
Jesus even existed at all.
Certainly not the 'almighty Jesus figure' to whom the Bible-writers (200-
300 years later) attributed all those 1000-year-old Egyption miracles and
deeds.
But that's another story and it is obvious you wouldn't be capable of having
a sensible debate about that.
A W-S
May God preserve us from religion.
and had no need to wait for
apes to evolve into a body for Him to inhabit.
In fact, for all practical purposes it can be stated that Jesus is
actually the
"Creator".
Ephesians 3:8-9 "Unto me, who am less than the least of all saints, is
this
grace given, that I should preach among the Gentiles the unsearchable
riches of
Christ; And to make all men see what is the fellowship of the mystery,
which
from the beginning of the world hath been hid in God, who created all
things by
Jesus Christ"
All Jesus had to do was deny His deity and he would've escaped
crucifixtion. But
he didn't.
"I and my Father are one".Then the Jews took up stones again to stone him.
Jesus answered them, "Many good works have I shewed you from my Father;
for
which of those works do ye stone me?" The Jews answered him, saying, "For
a good
work we stone thee not; but for blasphemy; and because that thou, being a
man,
makest thyself God". (John 10:30-33)
Then came Jesus forth, wearing the crown of thorns, and the purple robe.
And
Pilate saith unto them, "Behold the man!" When the chief priests therefore
and
officers saw him, they cried out, saying, "Crucify him, crucify him".
Pilate
saith unto them, "Take ye him, and crucify him: for I find no fault in
him".
The Jews answered him, "We have a law, and by our law he ought to die,
because
he made himself the Son of God". (John 19:5-7)
Jd
.
|
|
|
| User: "Jd" |
|
| Title: Re: Gene pools slime pools & plain fools |
30 Sep 2006 07:38:41 PM |
|
|
Adam Whyte-Settlar wrote:
"Jd" <ZionsFire@att.net> wrote in message
news:8bfjh2htahiebinm8j6080lo4dhevl912e@4ax.com...
.
One day Science could well discover something they will have to label
'God'.
I have no problem in accepting that God created evolution - are you
suggesting you 'know' He couldn't have done so?
If so you have even bigger ego problems than I thought.
A W-S
God did not create evolution.
Sure JD - you know better than God.
[backs away slowly]
Jesus Christ existed before the creation occurred
Actually JD - there are no contempory records or evidence whatsover that
Jesus even existed at all.
You're wrong there. I'm evidence as are all true Christans everywhere.
Jd
"I have declared, and have saved, and I have shewed, when there was no
strange god among you: therefore ye are my witnesses, saith the Lord,
that I am God." (Isaiah 43:12)
.
|
|
|
| User: "Adam Whyte-Settlar" |
|
| Title: Re: Gene pools slime pools & plain fools |
30 Sep 2006 10:13:57 PM |
|
|
"Jd" <ZionsFire@att.net> wrote in message
news:5iauh2dfutfcse7t65tp9vd60sabpo450i@4ax.com...
Adam Whyte-Settlar wrote:
"Jd" <ZionsFire@att.net> wrote in message
news:8bfjh2htahiebinm8j6080lo4dhevl912e@4ax.com...
.
One day Science could well discover something they will have to label
'God'.
I have no problem in accepting that God created evolution - are you
suggesting you 'know' He couldn't have done so?
If so you have even bigger ego problems than I thought.
A W-S
God did not create evolution.
Sure JD - you know better than God.
[backs away slowly]
Jesus Christ existed before the creation occurred
Actually JD - there are no contempory records or evidence whatsover that
Jesus even existed at all.
You're wrong there. I'm evidence as are all true Christans everywhere.
Dear oh dear.
You really think that prime example of demented logic is worthy of a serious
reply?
People like you give Christianity a bad name.
A W-S
.
|
|
|
| User: "Jd" |
|
| Title: Re: Gene pools slime pools & plain fools |
06 Oct 2006 10:23:05 PM |
|
|
Adam Whyte-Settlar wrote:
People like you give Christianity a bad name.
A W-S
Only if you're a Hindu who has 3,000+ gods or some other type of pagan
like a wican (witch) or a PETA pantheist.
Jd
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Free Lunch" |
|
| Title: Re: Gene pools slime pools & plain fools |
30 Sep 2006 09:39:12 PM |
|
|
On Sun, 01 Oct 2006 00:38:41 GMT, in alt.atheism
Jd <ZionsFire@att.net> wrote in
<5iauh2dfutfcse7t65tp9vd60sabpo450i@4ax.com>:
Adam Whyte-Settlar wrote:
"Jd" <ZionsFire@att.net> wrote in message
news:8bfjh2htahiebinm8j6080lo4dhevl912e@4ax.com...
.
One day Science could well discover something they will have to label
'God'.
I have no problem in accepting that God created evolution - are you
suggesting you 'know' He couldn't have done so?
If so you have even bigger ego problems than I thought.
A W-S
God did not create evolution.
Sure JD - you know better than God.
[backs away slowly]
Jesus Christ existed before the creation occurred
Actually JD - there are no contempory records or evidence whatsover that
Jesus even existed at all.
You're wrong there. I'm evidence as are all true Christans everywhere.
Could you please explain that one?
Does that also mean that Mohammed really did get the Koran from God
because more than a billion people are adherents to Islam?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Jd" |
|
| Title: Re: Gene pools slime pools & plain fools |
06 Oct 2006 10:23:05 PM |
|
|
Free Lunch wrote:
On Sun, 01 Oct 2006 00:38:41 GMT, in alt.atheism
Jd <ZionsFire@att.net> wrote in
<5iauh2dfutfcse7t65tp9vd60sabpo450i@4ax.com>:
Adam Whyte-Settlar wrote:
"Jd" <ZionsFire@att.net> wrote in message
news:8bfjh2htahiebinm8j6080lo4dhevl912e@4ax.com...
.
One day Science could well discover something they will have to label
'God'.
I have no problem in accepting that God created evolution - are you
suggesting you 'know' He couldn't have done so?
If so you have even bigger ego problems than I thought.
A W-S
God did not create evolution.
Sure JD - you know better than God.
[backs away slowly]
Jesus Christ existed before the creation occurred
Actually JD - there are no contempory records or evidence whatsover that
Jesus even existed at all.
You're wrong there. I'm evidence as are all true Christans everywhere.
Could you please explain that one?
Sure. Love to. All true Christians everywhere have the power to bear
witness of Jesus.
Acts 1:8 "But ye shall receive power, after that the Holy Ghost
is come upon you: and ye shall be witnesses unto me both in Jerusalem,
and in all Judaea, and in Samaria, and unto the uttermost part of the
earth."- Jesus
Now it's my turn to ask. What proof have you that men evolved from
apes?
Jd
"I have declared, and have saved, and I have shewed, when there was no
strange god among you: therefore ye are my witnesses, saith the Lord,
that I am God." (Isaiah 43:12)
.
|
|
|
| User: "Free Lunch" |
|
| Title: Re: Gene pools slime pools & plain fools |
06 Oct 2006 10:28:28 PM |
|
|
On Sat, 07 Oct 2006 03:23:05 GMT, in alt.atheism
Jd <ZionsFire@att.net> wrote in
<s4eei259n9m0rs963l1s3d0niqfvvimadu@4ax.com>:
Free Lunch wrote:
On Sun, 01 Oct 2006 00:38:41 GMT, in alt.atheism
Jd <ZionsFire@att.net> wrote in
<5iauh2dfutfcse7t65tp9vd60sabpo450i@4ax.com>:
Adam Whyte-Settlar wrote:
"Jd" <ZionsFire@att.net> wrote in message
news:8bfjh2htahiebinm8j6080lo4dhevl912e@4ax.com...
.
One day Science could well discover something they will have to label
'God'.
I have no problem in accepting that God created evolution - are you
suggesting you 'know' He couldn't have done so?
If so you have even bigger ego problems than I thought.
A W-S
God did not create evolution.
Sure JD - you know better than God.
[backs away slowly]
Jesus Christ existed before the creation occurred
Actually JD - there are no contempory records or evidence whatsover that
Jesus even existed at all.
You're wrong there. I'm evidence as are all true Christans everywhere.
Could you please explain that one?
Sure. Love to. All true Christians everywhere have the power to bear
witness of Jesus.
Acts 1:8 "But ye shall receive power, after that the Holy Ghost
is come upon you: and ye shall be witnesses unto me both in Jerusalem,
and in all Judaea, and in Samaria, and unto the uttermost part of the
earth."- Jesus
I read what is written, but I still don't see how you qualify as
evidence.
Now it's my turn to ask. What proof have you that men evolved from
apes?
Have you ever spent any time learning biology, genetics, paleontology,
or other life science related disciplines?
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
