I wrote:
Jason, I posted a response to your little self-serving commentary
about
the infidelguy domain. I got some sort of spool error, but I'm not
sure if it posted or not, so I'll wait a reasonable time and see if
it
does or not.
If it doesn't, I'll rewrite the reply.
But I'm chatting now with the fellow through whom I post to Google
and
he, in turn, posts on the Infidel Guy web site.
He's made a suggestion and I think it's a good one.
Now, as I said in my reply, I don't think anyone is going to beleive
your "after-the-fact" spin, but I suppose you could be turning over a
new leaf.
The self-righteous tone of your commentary says otherwise, but we can
give you the benefit of the doubt, I think.
But that won't happen in a vacuum.
Jason, if you want to prove that you really did what you did out of
"good will" for the "atheist community," if you were intending to
give
Reggie the domain, anyway, and if you really feel that Reggie's
financial situation is a problem - as opposed to your very successful
ministry, of course - then here's a suggestion:
Give the money back.
Or don't cash the check - destroy it. Whatever.
You see, Jason, the problem is that if you truly HAD been thinking
about giving the domain to Reggie all along, then why didn't you
offer
that when he called?
Why did you accept his offer?
Seems to me that the CHRISTIAN thing to do would have been to follow
up
on your "good will" thinking all along and just tell him he could
have
it.
But you can still make amends, and you can show that you have SOME
sincerity.
Give the money back, Jason.
Jason, I'm not surprised that you posted a one-shot in free.christians,
talk.origins and, I think, alt.atheism, and you pretended to clear up
any "misunderstanding" about the domain.
But did you notice that no one BELIEVES you?
Why do you think that is?
Give the money back, Jason.
.
