| Topic: |
Religions > Atheism |
| User: |
"George Hammond" |
| Date: |
01 Dec 2007 01:02:33 PM |
| Object: |
Re: GOD IS A CURVATURE OF REALITY |
On Sat, 01 Dec 2007 17:58:04 GMT, George Hammond
<Nowhere1@notspam.org> wrote:
Good morning Physics Dummies-
This is a public service announcement
from George Hammond (MS Physics '67)
reminding you that:
1. The world's first rigorous scientific
explanation of GOD has been
discovered and published.
2. You are cautioned that any further
argument that the God of the Bible
does not "exist" has now been rigorously
scientifically proven to be wrong.
3. Physicists are advised to proceed
with caution regarding Religion.
= FYI =
In 1915 Einstein discovered that Gravity is
a curvature of...... "objective" spacetime.
In 1997 Hammond discovered that "GOD" is
a curvature of...... "subjective" spacetime.
Objective spacetime is what- Physics sees.
Subjective spacetime is what- People see.
The former is called "spacetime",
The latter is called "reality".
In fact Hammond, 2003, has discovered, proven
and published in the peer reviewed literature the
now famous result that:
God = G_uv
QED:....... GOD IS A CURVATURE OF REALITY
========================================
SCIENTIFIC PROOF OF GOD WEBSITE
http://geocities.com/scientific_proof_of_god
mirror site:
http://proof-of-god.freewebsitehosting.com
GOD=G_uv (a folk song on mp3)
http://interrobang.jwgh.org/songs/hammond.mp3
========================================
.
|
|
| User: "thinker" |
|
| Title: Re: GOD IS A CURVATURE OF REALITY |
01 Dec 2007 03:14:20 PM |
|
|
"George Hammond" <Nowhere1@notspam.org> wrote in message
news:0mb3l35jhrp36tih5qlmns1firiih53p9l@4ax.com...
On Sat, 01 Dec 2007 17:58:04 GMT, George Hammond
<Nowhere1@notspam.org> wrote:
Good morning Physics Dummies-
This is a public service announcement
from George Hammond (MS Physics '67)
reminding you that:
1. The world's first rigorous scientific
explanation of GOD has been
discovered and published.
2. You are cautioned that any further
argument that the God of the Bible
does not "exist" has now been rigorously
scientifically proven to be wrong.
3. Physicists are advised to proceed
with caution regarding Religion.
= FYI =
In 1915 Einstein discovered that Gravity is
a curvature of...... "objective" spacetime.
In 1997 Hammond discovered that "GOD" is
a curvature of...... "subjective" spacetime.
Objective spacetime is what- Physics sees.
Subjective spacetime is what- People see.
The former is called "spacetime",
The latter is called "reality".
In fact Hammond, 2003, has discovered, proven
and published in the peer reviewed literature the
now famous result that:
God = G_uv
QED:....... GOD IS A CURVATURE OF REALITY
Good work, dude. Now we know.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "The_Sage" |
|
| Title: Re: GOD IS A CURVATURE OF REALITY |
01 Dec 2007 08:22:53 PM |
|
|
Reply to article by: George Hammond <Nowhere1@notspam.org>
Date written: Sat, 01 Dec 2007 19:02:33 GMT
MsgID:<0mb3l35jhrp36tih5qlmns1firiih53p9l@4ax.com>
1. The world's first rigorous scientific
Unless you have documented a laboratory experiment which can and has been
repeated by other scientists the world over, you are deluding yourself with
psuedoscientific drivel.
The Sage
=============================================================
http://members.cox.net/the.sage/index.htm
[The current anthropomorphic global warming nonsense is
based on] "inherently untrustworthy climate models, similar
to those that cannot accurately forecast the weather a week
from now" -- Dr. Richard Lindzen
=============================================================
.
|
|
|
| User: "George Hammond" |
|
| Title: Re: GOD IS A CURVATURE OF REALITY |
01 Dec 2007 09:36:52 PM |
|
|
On Sat, 01 Dec 2007 19:22:53 -0700, The_Sage
<The_Sage@everywhere.com> wrote:
Reply to article by: George Hammond <Nowhere1@notspam.org>
Date written: Sat, 01 Dec 2007 19:02:33 GMT
MsgID:<0mb3l35jhrp36tih5qlmns1firiih53p9l@4ax.com>
1. The world's first rigorous scientific
Unless you have documented a laboratory experiment which can and has been
repeated by other scientists the world over, you are deluding yourself with
psuedoscientific drivel.
The Sage
[Hammond]
Of course there is documented laboratory proof, 100 years
of it all published in the peer reviewed scientific
literature.
Look.... let me explain it to you in a nutshell.
Psychometry is the Factor Analysis of psychological
measurements (IQ, E, N, P etc). Factorists have known for
DECADES that 100 years of data (most of it done since 1970
using mainframe computers to diagonalize 100x100 matrices)
-- ALL result in a 4x4 "oblique" correlation matrix. But
being PSYCHOLOGISTS and not PHYSICISTS they couldn't figure
out WHAT IT MEANT or WHERE IT CAME FROM!
I'm simply a physicist who got involved in psychology and
began studying this well known fact. Immediately I noticed
that it is OBVIOUS that the 4x4 matrix is CURVED. I went
looking for the REASON that it would be curved and
discovered it comes from the 3-space and 1-time origins of
E,N,P,g via the orthogonal cleavage of the body and brain.
the whole thing is a scientific CAKE WALK for a physicist.
From there it is EASY to show that the CURVATURE of THIS
WELL KNOWN PSYCHOMETRY MATRIX explains "God" by
showing that it is caused by a CURVATURE OF SUBJECTIVE
SPACETIME caused by the SECULAR TREND IN HUMAN GROWTH.
Now ANY competent scientist can recognized that the
discovery of a:
CURVATURE OF SUBJECTIVE REALITY
that is measureable to TWO DECIMAL points (3 significant
figures) in THOUSANDS of peer published experiments is a
HISTORIC SCIENTIFIC DISCOVERY
and moreoverthat it is TRIVIAL to show that it explains
COMPLETELY the phenomenon of "GOD" SINCE IT EXPLAINS every
known phenomenological identification ever made about "God"
in the past 2,000 years.
Now if you want to call yourself a "sage", you should be
able to understand the SIGNIFICANCE of such a discovery.
For you to sit there and presume I'm an amateur or a
crackpot when this Factor Analytic result has been published
in a PREMIER academic journal is nothing but an atrocity
against the welfare of six billion innocent and suffering
people! An atrocity by you and the entire scientific
community who are competent to review this discovery.
All of you ought to be ashamed of yourselves.
========================================
SCIENTIFIC PROOF OF GOD WEBSITE
http://geocities.com/scientific_proof_of_god
mirror site:
http://proof-of-god.freewebsitehosting.com
GOD=G_uv (a folk song on mp3)
http://interrobang.jwgh.org/songs/hammond.mp3
========================================
=============================================================
http://members.cox.net/the.sage/index.htm
[The current anthropomorphic global warming nonsense is
based on] "inherently untrustworthy climate models, similar
to those that cannot accurately forecast the weather a week
from now" -- Dr. Richard Lindzen
=============================================================
.
|
|
|
| User: "brian fletcher" |
|
| Title: Re: GOD IS A CURVATURE OF REALITY |
02 Dec 2007 01:04:47 AM |
|
|
"George Hammond" <Nowhere1@notspam.org> wrote in message
news:0d84l39odd2vvb9q218s9tsj09jm3qvb25@4ax.com...
On Sat, 01 Dec 2007 19:22:53 -0700, The_Sage
<The_Sage@everywhere.com> wrote:
Reply to article by: George Hammond <Nowhere1@notspam.org>
Date written: Sat, 01 Dec 2007 19:02:33 GMT
MsgID:<0mb3l35jhrp36tih5qlmns1firiih53p9l@4ax.com>
1. The world's first rigorous scientific
Unless you have documented a laboratory experiment which can and has been
repeated by other scientists the world over, you are deluding yourself
with
psuedoscientific drivel.
The Sage
[Hammond]
Of course there is documented laboratory proof, 100 years
of it all published in the peer reviewed scientific
literature.
Look.... let me explain it to you in a nutshell.
Careful with your use of words George, some here would see that last comment
as self derogatory.
:-)
BOfL
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "The_Sage" |
|
| Title: Re: GOD IS A CURVATURE OF REALITY |
02 Dec 2007 12:23:43 PM |
|
|
Reply to article by: George Hammond <Nowhere1@notspam.org>
Date written: Sun, 02 Dec 2007 03:36:52 GMT
MsgID:<0d84l39odd2vvb9q218s9tsj09jm3qvb25@4ax.com>
1. The world's first rigorous scientific
Unless you have documented a laboratory experiment which can and has been
repeated by other scientists the world over, you are deluding yourself with
psuedoscientific drivel.
Of course there is documented laboratory proof, 100 years
of it all published in the peer reviewed scientific
literature.
Name one then.
The Sage
=============================================================
http://members.cox.net/the.sage/index.htm
[The current anthropomorphic global warming nonsense is
based on] "inherently untrustworthy climate models, similar
to those that cannot accurately forecast the weather a week
from now" -- Dr. Richard Lindzen
=============================================================
.
|
|
|
| User: "George Hammond" |
|
| Title: Re: GOD IS A CURVATURE OF REALITY |
03 Dec 2007 09:21:29 PM |
|
|
On Sun, 02 Dec 2007 11:23:43 -0700, The_Sage
<The_Sage@everywhere.com> wrote:
Reply to article by: George Hammond <Nowhere1@notspam.org>
Date written: Sun, 02 Dec 2007 03:36:52 GMT
MsgID:<0d84l39odd2vvb9q218s9tsj09jm3qvb25@4ax.com>
1. The world's first rigorous scientific
Unless you have documented a laboratory experiment which can and has been
repeated by other scientists the world over, you are deluding yourself with
psuedoscientific drivel.
Of course there is documented laboratory proof, 100 years
of it all published in the peer reviewed scientific
literature.
Name one then.
The Sage
[Hammond]
No problem.... here's a few thousand cited in my peer
published papers. Anything else you want to know?
BRAND, C.R. (1981). Personality and political attitudes. In:
Dimensions of
Personality, Richard Lynn (Ed.). London: Pergamon Press
BRAND, C.R. (1995) Dimensionalizing personality: The "Big
5", the "Gigantic 3"
and the "Capacious 6". Manuscript in preparation
CARROLL, J.B. (1953). An analytical solution for
approximating simple
structure
in factor analysis. Psychometrika, Vol. 18, pp. 23-38
CLARIDGE, G. (1985). Origins of Mental Illness. Oxford:
Basil Blackwell
CLARIDGE, G. (1986). Eysenck's Contribution to the
Psychology of Personality,
Consensus & Controversy: Papers in Honor of Hans Eysenck,
Modgil & Modgil
(eds), .......
COSTA, P.T., & McCRAE R.R. (1985). The NEO Personality
Inventory Manual.
Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources
COSTA P.T., McCRAE R.R. & DYE D.A. (1991), Facet Scales for
Agreeableness
and
Conscientiousness: A Revision of the NEO Personality
Inventory, Personality
and Individual Differences, Vol. 12, No. 9, pp. 887-898
COSTA P.T. & McCRAE R.R. (1992), Revised NEO Personality
inventory (NEO
PI-RTM)
and NEO Five-factor inventory (NEO-FFI) professional manual.
Odessa, FL:
Psychological Assessment Resources
COSTA P.T. & McCRAE R.R. (1992a), Four Ways Five Factors are
Basic,
Personality
and Individual Differences, Vol.13, No.6, pp. 653-665
DE RAAD, B. &, HOFSTEE W.K.B. (1993). A circumplex approach
to the five factor
model: A facet structure of trait adjectives supplemented by
trait verbs.
Personality and Individual Differences, Vol. 15, No. 5,
493-505
DIGMAN, J.M. (1990). Personality structure: Emergence of the
Five-Factor
model.
Annual Revue of Psychology, 41, 417-440
EYSENCK, H.J. (1940). Some factors in the appreciation of
poetry, and their
relation to temperamental qualities. Character and
Personality, 9, 160-167
EYSENCK H.J. (1944a), General Social Attitudes, Journal of
Social Psychology,
19, 207-227
EYSENCK, H.J. (1944b). Types of personality- a factorial
study of 700
neurotics.
Journal of Mental Science, 90, 851-861
EYSENCK H.J. (1947), Dimensions of Personality. London,
U.K.: Routledge
EYSENCK, H.J. (1950). Clyclothymia-schizothymia as a
dimension of personality.
I. Historical review. Journal of Personality, 19, 123-153
EYSENCK H.J. (1952), The Scientific Study of Personality,
Routledge & Kegan
Paul, London
EYSENCK H.J. (1954), The Psychology of Politics, London,
U.K.: Routledge
EYSENCK, H.J. (1955). A dynamic theory of anxiety and
hysteria, Journal of
Mental Science, 101, 28-51
EYSENCK, H.J. (1964). Principles and methods of personality
description,
classification and diagnosis. British Journal of Psychology,
55, 3, 285-294
EYSENCK H.J. (1967), The Biological Basis of Personality.
Springfield, IL:
Charles C. Thomas
EYSENCK, H.J. (1970), The Structure of Human
Personality,(3rd ed.), Methuen,
London
EYSENCK, H.J. (1970b). A dimensional system of
psychodiagnostics. In:A.R.
Mahrer
(Ed.), New Approaches to Personality Classification. New
York: Columbia
University Press
EYSENCK, H.J. (1971), Social Attitudes and Social Class,
Brit. J. Soc. Clin.
Psychol., 10, 201-212
EYSENCK H.J. (1976), The Measurement of Personality,
Lancaster
EYSENCK, H.J. (1987). The definition of personality
disorders and the criteria
appropriate for their descriptions. Journal of Personality
Disorders, 1, 211-
219
EYSENCK H.J. (1991), Dimensions of Personality: 16, 5 or 3?-
Criteria for a
Taxonomic Paradigm, Person. Individ. Diff., Vol. 12, No. 8,
773-790
EYSENCK H.J. (1992), Four Ways Five Factors Are Not Basic,
Personality &
Individual Differences, Vol. 13, No. 6, 667-673
EYSENCK, H.J. (1992b). The definition and measurement of
Psychoticism.
Personality and Individual Differences, Vol. 13, 7, 757-785
EYSENCK, H.J. (1993), Comment on Goldberg, American
Psychologist, December
1993,
p. 1299
EYSENCK H.J. & EYSENCK M.W. (1985), Personality and
individual differences: A
natural science approach. New York, Plenum
EYSENCK H.J. & EYSENCK S.B.G. (1969), Personality Structure
& Measurement,
Routledge & Kegan Paul, London
EYSENCK H.J. & EYSENCK S.B.G (1976), Psychoticism as a
Dimension of
Personality.
London: Hodder & Stoughton
EYSENCK H.J. & WILSON G.D. (1978), The Psychological Basis
of Ideology,
University Park Press, Baltimore
FERGUSON G.A. (1954), The concept of parsimony in factor
analysis.
Psychometrika, vol. 19, pp. 281-290
FERGUSON L.W. (1939), Primary Social Attitudes, J.
Psychology, 8, 217-223
FERGUSON L.W. (1973), Primary Social Attitudes of the 1960s
and Those of the
1930s, Psychological Reports, 33,655-664
FRANCIS, L.J. (1993). The dual nature of the Eysenckian
Neuroticism scales: A
question of sex differences? Personality and Individual
Differences, Vol 15,
1, 43-59
GOLDBERG, L.R. (1981), Language and Individual Differences:
The Search for
Universals in Personality Lexicons, In L. Wheeler (Ed.),
Review of Persoality
and Social Psychology, Vol.2, pp. 141-165, Beverly Hills CA:
Sage
GOLDBERG, L.R. (1990), An Alternative "Description of
Personality": The
Big-Five
Factor Structure, Journal of Personality and Social
Psychology, 59, 1216-1229
GOLDBERG, L.R. (1992), The Development of markers for the
Big-Five factor
structure. Psychological Assessment, 4, pp. 26-42
GOLDBERG, L.R. (1993), The Structure of Phenotypic
Personality Traits,
American
Psychologist,48, 26-34
GORSUCH, R.L. (1983), Factor Analysis, London: Erlbaum
GRAY J.A. (1970), The Psychophysiological Basis of
Introversion-Extroversion,
Behav. Res. Ther., 8, 249-266
GRAY J.A. (1972), The Psychophysiological Basis of
Introversion-Extraversion:
A Modification of Eysenck's Theory, In: Nebylitsyn V.D.,
Gray J.A. (eds.),
The Biological Basis of Individual Behavior, pp. 185-205,
The Academic Press,
New York
GRAY J.A. (1981), A Critique of Eysenck's Theory of
Personality, In: Eysenck
H.J. (ed.), A Model for Personality, Springer, New York
GRAY J.A. (1982), The Neuropsychology of Anxiety, An Enquiry
Into the
Functions
of the Septohippocampal System, Oxford University Press, New
York
GRAY J.A. (1987a), The Psychology of Fear and Stress, second
edition,
Cambridge
University Press, Cambridge, England
GRAY J.A. (1987b), The Neuropsychology of Emotion and
Personality, In: S.M.
Stahl, S.D. Iverson & E.C. Goodman (eds.), Cognitive
Neurochemistry, Oxford
University Press, Oxford, England
GRAY J.A. (1987c), Perspectives on Anxiety and Impulsivity:
A Commentary,
Journal of Research in Personality, Vol. 21, 493-509
GRAY J.A. (1988), Behavioral and Neural-System Analyses of
the Action of
Anxiolytic Drugs, Pharmacology Biochemistry & Behavior, Vol.
29, 767-769
GRAY J.A. (1991a), Neural Systems, Emotion and Personality,
In: John Madden IV
(ed.), Neurobiology of Learning, Emotion and Affect, Raven
Press
GRAY J.A. (1991b), The Neuropsychology of Temperament, In:
J. Strelau & A.
Angleitner (eds.), Explorations in Temperament, Plenum Press
GRAY J.A. et al. (1991c), The Neuropsychology of
Schizophrenia, Behavioral and
Brain Science, Vol. 14, 1-84
HAMMOND, G.E. (1988). The Origin of the Cross. Self
published, ISBN
0-940915-02-
2 LC 87-80586
HAMMOND, G.E. (1994). The Cartesian Theory: Unification of
Eysenck and Gray,
New
Ideas in Psychology,Vol. 12, 2, 153-167
HARMAN, H.H. (1976), Modern Factor Analysis (3rd ed.),
Chicago: University of
Chicago Press
HENDRICKSON A.E. & WHITE P.O. (1964), PROMAX: A quick method
for
rotation to
oblique simple structure. British Journal of Statistical
Psychology, vol. 17,
pp. 65-70
HEYMANS G. (1929), Inleiding in de speciale psychologie
[Introduction into
special psychology]. Haarlem, Bohn
HOFSTEE, W.K.B., De RAAD, B., & GOLDBERG L.R. (1992).
Integration of the Big-
Five and Circumplex approaches to trait structure. Journal
of Personality and
Social Psychology, 63, 146-163
HOFSTEE W.K.B. (1994a), The Abridged Big Five Circumplex
(AB5C) Model of
Trait
Structure: Heymans' Cube, Kiesler's Circle and Peabody and
Goldberg's Double
Cone Model, Revue europeenne de Psychologie Applique, 1st
trimestre, vol. 44,
No. 1, pp. 27-33
HORST, P.A. (1941), A non-graphical method for transforming
an arbitrary
factor
matrix into a simple structure matrix, Psychometrika, vol.
6, pp. 79-99
JOHN O.P. (1990), The "Big Five" Factor Taxonomy: Dimensions
of Personality in
the Natural Language and Questionnaires, In: L. Pervin
(ed.), Handbook of
Personality: Theory and Research, 66-100, Guilford, New York
JOHNSON, J.A. &, OSTENDORF, F. (1993). Clarification of the
five-factor model
with the abridged big five dimensional circumplex. Journal
of Personality and
Social Psychology, Vol. 65, No. 3, 563-576
KAISER, H.F. (1958). The Varimax criterion for analytic
rotation in factor
analysis. Psychometrika, vol. 23(3), pp. 187-200
KASS, F., SKODOL, A., CHARLES, E., SPITZER, R.L., &
WILLIAMS, J.B.W.
(1985).
Scaled ratings of DSM-III personality disorders. American
Journal of
Psychiatry, 142, 627-630
KRAEPELIN, E. (1897). Psychiatrie (6th Edn). Leipzig: Barth
KRETSCHMER, E. (1946). Medizinische Psychologie. Leipzig:
Thieme
KRETSCHMER, E. (1948). Korperbau und Charakter. Berlin:
Springer
KRUG S.E. & JOHNS E.F. (1986), A Large Scale
Cross-Validation of Second-Order
Personality Structure Defined by the 16PF, Psychological
Reports, 59, 683-693
LEARY, T. (1957). Interpersonal Diagnosis of Personality.
New York: Ronald
Press
MERENDA P.F. (1987), Toward a Four-Factor Theory of
Temperament and/or
Personality, Journal of Personality Assessment, 51(3),
367-374
MERENDA P.F. (1989), Four-factor models of personality and
Walter Clarke's
Activity Vector Analysis. Tenth Clarke Memorial Lecture,
Bryant College,
Providence RI, November 30, 1989. (Available from Peter F.
Merenda)
MERENDA P.F. & CLARKE W.V. (1959), Factor analysis of a
measure of social
self.
Psychological Reports, 5, pp. 597-605
MODGIL, S. &, MODGIL, C. (1986). Hans Eysenck, Consensus and
Controversy.
Philidelphia: Falmer Press
NEUHAUS J.O. & WRIGLEY C. (1954), The Quartimax method: an
analytical
approach
to orthogonal simple structure. British Journal of
Statistical Psychology,
vol. 7, pp. 81-91
NORMAN, W.T. (1963). Toward an adequate taxonomy of
personality attributes:
replicated factor structure in peer nomination personality
ratings. Journal
of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 66, 574-583
O'BOYLE, M., & HOLZER, C. (1992). DSM-III-R personality
disorders and
Eysenck's
personality dimensions. Personality and Individual
Differences, Vol. 13, No.
10, 1157-1159
PEABODY, D. (1970). Evaluative and descriptive aspects in
personality
perception: A reappraisal. Journal of personality and social
psychology,
1970, Vol.16, 4, 639-646
PEABODY, D. (1984). Personality dimensions through trait
inferences. Journal
of
personality and social psychology, Vol.46, 2, 384-403
PEABODY, D. (1987). Selecting representative trait
adjectives. Journal of
personality and social psychology, Vol.52, 1, 59-71
PEABODY, D., & GOLDBERG L.R. (1989). Some determinants of
factor structures
from
personality-trait descriptors. Journal of personality and
social psychology,
Vol.57, 3, 552-567
RAY J. (1986), Eysenck on social attitudes: An historical
critique, In S.
Modgil
& C. Modgil (Eds.), Hans Eysenck, Consensus and Controversy,
Falmer, U.K.:
Falmer Press
REICH, J.H., & THOMPSON, W.D. (1987). Differential
assortment of DSM-III
personality disorder clusters in three populations. British
Journal of
Psychiatry, 150, 471-475
SAUCIER, G., & GOLDBERG, L.R. (1994 in press). The language
of personality:
Lexical perspectives on the Five-Factor model. In: J.S.
Wiggins (Ed.),
Theoretical perspectives for the Five-Factor model. New
York: Guilford
SMITH B.D. (1988), Chapter 20, In: Nesselroade and Cattell
eds.: Handbook of
multivariate experimental psychology (2nd ed.), Plenum
Press, NY NY
THURSTONE, L.L. (1933), The vectors of the mind,
Psychological Review, vol.
41(1), pp. 1-32
THURSTONE, L.L. (1947), Multiple-Factor Analysis, Chicago:
University of
Chicago
Press
TUPES, E.C., & CRYSTAL, R.E. (1961). Recurrent personality
factors based on
trait ratings (Tech. Rep. ASD-TR-61-97). Lackland Air Force
Base, TX: U.S.
Air Force
WIGGINS, J.S. (1980). Circumplex models of interpersonal
behavior. In: L
Wheeler
(Ed.), Review of personality and social psychology (Vol. 1,
pp. 265-294).
Beverly Hills, CA: Sage
ZUCKERMAN M., KUHLMAN M. & CAMAC C. (1988), What Lies Beyond
E and
N? Factor
Analyses of Scales Believed to Measure Basic Dimensions of
Personality,
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 96-107
ZUCKERMAN et al. (1991), Five (or Three) Robust
Questionnaire Scale Factors of
Personality Without Culture, Personality and Individual
Differences, Vol. 12,
No. 9, 929-942
ZUCKERMAN M. (1993), A comparison of three structural models
for personality:
The Big Three, the Big Five, and the Alternative Five.
Journal of
Personality and Social Psychology, Vol 65, No. 4, pp.
757-768
========================================
SCIENTIFIC PROOF OF GOD WEBSITE
http://geocities.com/scientific_proof_of_god
mirror site:
http://proof-of-god.freewebsitehosting.com
GOD=G_uv (a folk song on mp3)
http://interrobang.jwgh.org/songs/hammond.mp3
========================================
.
|
|
|
| User: "Jeckyl" |
|
| Title: Re: GOD IS A CURVATURE OF REALITY |
03 Dec 2007 11:03:40 PM |
|
|
"George Hammond" <Nowhere1@notspam.org> wrote in message
news:8oh9l3d2dislbvbb879ilcar391deevdho@4ax.com...
On Sun, 02 Dec 2007 11:23:43 -0700, The_Sage
<The_Sage@everywhere.com> wrote:
Reply to article by: George Hammond <Nowhere1@notspam.org>
Date written: Sun, 02 Dec 2007 03:36:52 GMT
MsgID:<0d84l39odd2vvb9q218s9tsj09jm3qvb25@4ax.com>
1. The world's first rigorous scientific
Unless you have documented a laboratory experiment which can and has
been
repeated by other scientists the world over, you are deluding yourself
with
psuedoscientific drivel.
Of course there is documented laboratory proof, 100 years
of it all published in the peer reviewed scientific
literature.
Name one then.
The Sage
[Hammond]
No problem.... here's a few thousand cited in my peer
published papers. Anything else you want to know?
Yeah .. why are you such an idiot .. is it a psychological problem?
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "The_Sage" |
|
| Title: Re: GOD IS A CURVATURE OF REALITY |
04 Dec 2007 10:03:14 PM |
|
|
Reply to article by: George Hammond <Nowhere1@notspam.org>
Date written: Tue, 04 Dec 2007 03:21:29 GMT
MsgID:<8oh9l3d2dislbvbb879ilcar391deevdho@4ax.com>
1. The world's first rigorous scientific
Unless you have documented a laboratory experiment which can and has been
repeated by other scientists the world over, you are deluding yourself with
psuedoscientific drivel.
Of course there is documented laboratory proof, 100 years
of it all published in the peer reviewed scientific
literature.
Name one then.
[Hammond]
No problem...
Actually, big problem. Not one of the articles you cite is a peer reviewed
scientific journal. Not one of the articles list any physical experiments that
YOU created and were reproduced by someone else. I asked for *EXPERIMENTAL
PROOF*, not proof by filibuster. Experimental proof means a laboratory setting
where things are measured and recorded. Hearsay and meresay is not proof.
The Sage
=============================================================
http://members.cox.net/the.sage/index.htm
[The current anthropomorphic global warming nonsense is
based on] "inherently untrustworthy climate models, similar
to those that cannot accurately forecast the weather a week
from now" -- Dr. Richard Lindzen
=============================================================
.
|
|
|
| User: "George Hammond" |
|
| Title: Re: GOD IS A CURVATURE OF REALITY |
05 Dec 2007 01:36:58 AM |
|
|
On Tue, 04 Dec 2007 21:03:14 -0700, The_Sage
<The_Sage@everywhere.com> wrote:
Reply to article by: George Hammond <Nowhere1@notspam.org>
Date written: Tue, 04 Dec 2007 03:21:29 GMT
MsgID:<8oh9l3d2dislbvbb879ilcar391deevdho@4ax.com>
1. The world's first rigorous scientific
Unless you have documented a laboratory experiment which can and has been
repeated by other scientists the world over, you are deluding yourself with
psuedoscientific drivel.
Of course there is documented laboratory proof, 100 years
of it all published in the peer reviewed scientific
literature.
Name one then.
[Hammond]
No problem...
Actually, big problem. Not one of the articles you cite is a peer reviewed
scientific journal.
[Hammond]
Geez... that post was so long I didn't think it got
thru... I can't find it on my news reader.... but since you
saw it it must have got thru o.k.
Anyway, you're wrong..... EVERY ONE OF THOSE PAPERS IS
PUBLISHED IN A PEER REVIEWED JOURNAL AND THE JOURNALS ARE
CLEARLY LISTED! Where the hell did you get the idea they
are not peer reviewed?
Not one of the articles list any physical experiments that
YOU created and were reproduced by someone else.
[Hammond]
Einstein wasn't an experimentalist and neither am I. He
never did an experiment in his life. Theorists like us USE
the data of experimentalists to DISCOVER AND PROVE
SCIENTIFIC THEORIES. You don't even know what Science is
for chrissakes.
I asked for *EXPERIMENTAL
PROOF*,
[Hammond]
ALL of those hundreds of papers are publications of
EXPERMENTAL RESULTS. The experiments reported consist of
the administration of written tests given to millions of
REAL PEOPLE worldwide and then the tests are correlated,
factored and the eigenvectors extracted. This activity is
the MAINSTAY of modern experimental psychology research
employing thousands of Phd's and costing millions of dollars
and all of it published in peer reviewed journals.
not proof by filibuster. Experimental proof means a laboratory setting
where things are measured and recorded. Hearsay and meresay is not proof.
[Hammond]
"Experimental" means "actual physical measurement" and that
is EXACTLY what those thousands of papers report....actual
experimental measurements taken on REAL PEOPLE, in
psychology laboratories by the way.
The Sage
========================================
SCIENTIFIC PROOF OF GOD WEBSITE
http://geocities.com/scientific_proof_of_god
mirror site:
http://proof-of-god.freewebsitehosting.com
GOD=G_uv (a folk song on mp3)
http://interrobang.jwgh.org/songs/hammond.mp3
========================================
.
|
|
|
| User: "pico pico.pico.pico" |
|
| Title: Re: GOD IS A CURVATURE OF REALITY |
05 Dec 2007 03:21:01 PM |
|
|
"George Hammond" <Nowhere1@notspam.org> wrote in message
news:d2kcl39jfegra70v4ded201ak36cacq233@4ax.com...
Einstein wasn't an experimentalist and neither am I. He
never did an experiment in his life. Theorists like us USE
the data of experimentalists to DISCOVER AND PROVE
SCIENTIFIC THEORIES. You don't even know what Science is
for chrissakes.
Did Einstein claim his theories were PROOF? I think not.
.
|
|
|
| User: "George Hammond" |
|
| Title: Re: GOD IS A CURVATURE OF REALITY |
05 Dec 2007 06:38:26 PM |
|
|
On Wed, 5 Dec 2007 15:21:01 -0600, "pico" <pico.pico.pico>
wrote:
"George Hammond" <Nowhere1@notspam.org> wrote in message
news:d2kcl39jfegra70v4ded201ak36cacq233@4ax.com...
Einstein wasn't an experimentalist and neither am I. He
never did an experiment in his life. Theorists like us USE
the data of experimentalists to DISCOVER AND PROVE
SCIENTIFIC THEORIES. You don't even know what Science is
for chrissakes.
Did Einstein claim his theories were PROOF? I think not.
[Hammond]
Because Gravity is a noncontroversial non-political
subject Einstein was allowed to publish his discovery that
Gravity is caused by a curvature of OBJECTIVE spacetime in
prestigeous scientific journals read by educated people. Of
course Einstein's discovery is so obvious that it was
accepted as "sufficiently proven" immediately.
The discovery that God is a curvature of SUBJECTIVE
spacetime is EQUALLY OBVIOUS and therefore equally "proven".
But proof that God is a "CURVATURE OF REALITY" is a
STUNNING, CONTROVERSIAL AND POLITICALLY DANGEROUS
discovery vehemently opposed by atheistic academia and I am
not allowed to publish it in a leading journal.... instead I
am allowed to be ridiculed and harassed by psychotic
wannabees on the Internet which is the only
non-establishment controlled publishing medium available to
me. You're just another piece of establishment lacky scum
who cruises Usenet looking to smear and oppressed legitimate
"non-establishment scientists" working full time to destroy
my reputation. Scum.
========================================
SCIENTIFIC PROOF OF GOD WEBSITE
http://geocities.com/scientific_proof_of_god
mirror site:
http://proof-of-god.freewebsitehosting.com
GOD=G_uv (a folk song on mp3)
http://interrobang.jwgh.org/songs/hammond.mp3
========================================
.
|
|
|
| User: "pico pico.pico.pico" |
|
| Title: Re: GOD IS A CURVATURE OF REALITY |
07 Dec 2007 10:34:08 AM |
|
|
"George Hammond" <Nowhere1@notspam.org> wrote in message
news:ajfel3dklohs74p7p6bq6co6t02adf2i65@4ax.com...
On Wed, 5 Dec 2007 15:21:01 -0600, "pico" <pico.pico.pico>
wrote:
"George Hammond" <Nowhere1@notspam.org> wrote in message
news:d2kcl39jfegra70v4ded201ak36cacq233@4ax.com...
Einstein wasn't an experimentalist and neither am I. He
never did an experiment in his life. Theorists like us USE
the data of experimentalists to DISCOVER AND PROVE
SCIENTIFIC THEORIES. You don't even know what Science is
for chrissakes.
Did Einstein claim his theories were PROOF? I think not.
[Hammond]
Because Gravity is a noncontroversial non-political
subject Einstein was allowed to publish his discovery that
Gravity is caused by a curvature of OBJECTIVE spacetime in
prestigeous scientific journals read by educated people. Of
course Einstein's discovery is so obvious that it was
accepted as "sufficiently proven" immediately.
Not true.
The discovery that God is a curvature of SUBJECTIVE
spacetime is EQUALLY OBVIOUS and therefore equally "proven".
Doubly untrue.
.
|
|
|
| User: "George Hammond" |
|
| Title: Re: GOD IS A CURVATURE OF REALITY |
07 Dec 2007 11:01:58 AM |
|
|
On Fri, 7 Dec 2007 10:34:08 -0600, "pico" <pico.pico.pico>
wrote:
"George Hammond" <Nowhere1@notspam.org> wrote in message
news:ajfel3dklohs74p7p6bq6co6t02adf2i65@4ax.com...
On Wed, 5 Dec 2007 15:21:01 -0600, "pico" <pico.pico.pico>
wrote:
"George Hammond" <Nowhere1@notspam.org> wrote in message
news:d2kcl39jfegra70v4ded201ak36cacq233@4ax.com...
Einstein wasn't an experimentalist and neither am I. He
never did an experiment in his life. Theorists like us USE
the data of experimentalists to DISCOVER AND PROVE
SCIENTIFIC THEORIES. You don't even know what Science is
for chrissakes.
Did Einstein claim his theories were PROOF? I think not.
[Hammond]
Because Gravity is a noncontroversial non-political
subject Einstein was allowed to publish his discovery that
Gravity is caused by a curvature of OBJECTIVE spacetime in
prestigeous scientific journals read by educated people. Of
course Einstein's discovery is so obvious that it was
accepted as "sufficiently proven" immediately.
Not true.
[Hammond]
Doubly true.
The discovery that God is a curvature of SUBJECTIVE
spacetime is EQUALLY OBVIOUS and therefore equally "proven".
Doubly untrue.
[Hammond]
Triply true.
========================================
SCIENTIFIC PROOF OF GOD WEBSITE
http://geocities.com/scientific_proof_of_god
mirror site:
http://proof-of-god.freewebsitehosting.com
GOD=G_uv (a folk song on mp3)
http://interrobang.jwgh.org/songs/hammond.mp3
========================================
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Jeckyl" |
|
| Title: Re: GOD IS A CURVATURE OF REALITY |
05 Dec 2007 09:51:15 PM |
|
|
"George Hammond" <Nowhere1@notspam.org> wrote in message
news:ajfel3dklohs74p7p6bq6co6t02adf2i65@4ax.com...
The discovery that God is a curvature of SUBJECTIVE
spacetime is EQUALLY OBVIOUS and therefore equally "proven".
But proof that God is a "CURVATURE OF REALITY" is a
STUNNING, CONTROVERSIAL AND POLITICALLY DANGEROUS
Its not a discovery .. its the rantings of a lunatic.
You're just another piece of establishment lacky scum
who cruises Usenet looking to smear and oppressed legitimate
"non-establishment scientists" working full time to destroy
my reputation. Scum.
You have no reputation .. except as a raving loony.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Free Lunch" |
|
| Title: Re: GOD IS A CURVATURE OF REALITY |
05 Dec 2007 07:11:10 PM |
|
|
On Thu, 06 Dec 2007 00:38:26 GMT, in alt.atheism
George Hammond <Nowhere1@notspam.org> wrote in
<ajfel3dklohs74p7p6bq6co6t02adf2i65@4ax.com>:
On Wed, 5 Dec 2007 15:21:01 -0600, "pico" <pico.pico.pico>
wrote:
"George Hammond" <Nowhere1@notspam.org> wrote in message
news:d2kcl39jfegra70v4ded201ak36cacq233@4ax.com...
Einstein wasn't an experimentalist and neither am I. He
never did an experiment in his life. Theorists like us USE
the data of experimentalists to DISCOVER AND PROVE
SCIENTIFIC THEORIES. You don't even know what Science is
for chrissakes.
Did Einstein claim his theories were PROOF? I think not.
[Hammond]
Because Gravity is a noncontroversial non-political
subject Einstein was allowed to publish his discovery that
Gravity is caused by a curvature of OBJECTIVE spacetime in
prestigeous scientific journals read by educated people. Of
course Einstein's discovery is so obvious that it was
accepted as "sufficiently proven" immediately.
The discovery that God is a curvature of SUBJECTIVE
spacetime is EQUALLY OBVIOUS and therefore equally "proven".
But proof that God is a "CURVATURE OF REALITY" is a
STUNNING, CONTROVERSIAL AND POLITICALLY DANGEROUS
discovery vehemently opposed by atheistic academia and I am
not allowed to publish it in a leading journal.... instead I
am allowed to be ridiculed and harassed by psychotic
wannabees on the Internet which is the only
non-establishment controlled publishing medium available to
me. You're just another piece of establishment lacky scum
who cruises Usenet looking to smear and oppressed legitimate
"non-establishment scientists" working full time to destroy
my reputation. Scum.
Your delusions are noted. Your total lack of evidence is also noted.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "George Hammond" |
|
| Title: Re: GOD IS A CURVATURE OF REALITY |
05 Dec 2007 06:59:04 PM |
|
|
On Wed, 5 Dec 2007 16:48:54 -0800 (PST),
panamfloyd@hotmail.com wrote:
On Dec 5, 7:38 pm, George Hammond <Nowhe...@notspam.org> wrote:
On Wed, 5 Dec 2007 15:21:01 -0600, "pico" <pico.pico.pico>
wrote:
"George Hammond" <Nowhe...@notspam.org> wrote in message
news:d2kcl39jfegra70v4ded201ak36cacq233@4ax.com...
Einstein wasn't an experimentalist and neither am I. He
never did an experiment in his life. Theorists like us USE
the data of experimentalists to DISCOVER AND PROVE
SCIENTIFIC THEORIES. You don't even know what Science is
for chrissakes.
Did Einstein claim his theories were PROOF? I think not.
[Hammond]
Because Gravity is a noncontroversial non-political
subject Einstein was allowed to publish his discovery that
Gravity is caused by a curvature of OBJECTIVE spacetime in
prestigeous scientific journals read by educated people. Of
course Einstein's discovery is so obvious that it was
accepted as "sufficiently proven" immediately.
The discovery that God is a curvature of SUBJECTIVE
spacetime is EQUALLY OBVIOUS and therefore equally "proven".
But proof that God is a "CURVATURE OF REALITY" is a
STUNNING, CONTROVERSIAL AND POLITICALLY DANGEROUS
discovery vehemently opposed by atheistic academia and I am
not allowed to publish it in a leading journal.... instead I
am allowed to be ridiculed and harassed by psychotic
wannabees on the Internet which is the only
non-establishment controlled publishing medium available to
me. You're just another piece of establishment lacky scum
who cruises Usenet looking to smear and oppressed legitimate
"non-establishment scientists" working full time to destroy
my reputation. Scum.
========================================
SCIENTIFIC PROOF OF GOD WEBSITE
http://geocities.com/scientific_proof_of_god
mirror site:
http://proof-of-god.freewebsitehosting.com
GOD=G_uv (a folk song on mp3)
http://interrobang.jwgh.org/songs/hammond.mp3
========================================
*What* reputation is that, George? Your reputation as a harebrained
nut?
-Panama Floyd, Atlanta.
aa#2015/KoBAAWA!
[Hammond]
Wrong.... Usenet is a bunch of hair brained nuts and the
public well knows it. I'm only reason I'm here is because
the ACADEMIC ESTABLISHEMT is PRO-ATEHIST and won't allow me
to speak or publish in establishment controlled media.....
psycho!
========================================
SCIENTIFIC PROOF OF GOD WEBSITE
http://geocities.com/scientific_proof_of_god
mirror site:
http://proof-of-god.freewebsitehosting.com
GOD=G_uv (a folk song on mp3)
http://interrobang.jwgh.org/songs/hammond.mp3
========================================
.
|
|
|
| User: "Jeckyl" |
|
| Title: Re: GOD IS A CURVATURE OF REALITY |
05 Dec 2007 09:52:20 PM |
|
|
"George Hammond" <Nowhere1@notspam.org> wrote in message
news:h4iel3pqai7hbubk6cc9g5hqs4n85k2oho@4ax.com...
[Hammond]
Wrong.... Usenet is a bunch of hair brained nuts and the
public well knows it. I'm only reason I'm here is because
the ACADEMIC ESTABLISHEMT is PRO-ATEHIST and won't allow me
to speak or publish in establishment controlled media.....
psycho!
Because what you want to publish is complete and utter drivel. No
self-respecting editor would publish such crap.
.
|
|
|
| User: "George Hammond" |
|
| Title: Re: GOD IS A CURVATURE OF REALITY |
05 Dec 2007 10:45:18 PM |
|
|
On Thu, 6 Dec 2007 14:52:20 +1100, "Jeckyl"
<noone@nowhere.com> wrote:
"George Hammond" <Nowhere1@notspam.org> wrote in message
news:h4iel3pqai7hbubk6cc9g5hqs4n85k2oho@4ax.com...
[Hammond]
Wrong.... Usenet is a bunch of hair brained nuts and the
public well knows it. I'm only reason I'm here is because
the ACADEMIC ESTABLISHEMT is PRO-ATEHIST and won't allow me
to speak or publish in establishment controlled media.....
psycho!
Because what you want to publish is complete and utter drivel. No
self-respecting editor would publish such crap.
[Hammond]
You're a proven liar:
Hammond G.E (1994) The Cartesian Theory, in
New Ideas In Psychology, Vol 12(2) 153-167
Pergamon Press. Online copy of peer/published
paper is posted at:
http://geocities.com/scientific_proof_of_god/cart.html
Pergamon Press is one of the world's primeir academic
publishers. Liar, stooge, scum, moron.
========================================
SCIENTIFIC PROOF OF GOD WEBSITE
http://geocities.com/scientific_proof_of_god
mirror site:
http://proof-of-god.freewebsitehosting.com
GOD=G_uv (a folk song on mp3)
http://interrobang.jwgh.org/songs/hammond.mp3
========================================
.
|
|
|
| User: "Jeckyl" |
|
| Title: Re: GOD IS A CURVATURE OF REALITY |
05 Dec 2007 11:25:16 PM |
|
|
"George Hammond" <Nowhere1@notspam.org> wrote in message
news:jdvel3pfudd9jajb3vv39ir65d36fgghhd@4ax.com...
On Thu, 6 Dec 2007 14:52:20 +1100, "Jeckyl"
<noone@nowhere.com> wrote:
"George Hammond" <Nowhere1@notspam.org> wrote in message
news:h4iel3pqai7hbubk6cc9g5hqs4n85k2oho@4ax.com...
[Hammond]
Wrong.... Usenet is a bunch of hair brained nuts and the
public well knows it. I'm only reason I'm here is because
the ACADEMIC ESTABLISHEMT is PRO-ATEHIST and won't allow me
to speak or publish in establishment controlled media.....
psycho!
Because what you want to publish is complete and utter drivel. No
self-respecting editor would publish such crap.
[Hammond]
You're a proven liar:
Really .. where is this proof?
If it is anything like your proof about God then it doesn't exist.
Take your meds and get back to reality.
.
|
|
|
| User: "George Hammond" |
|
| Title: Re: GOD IS A CURVATURE OF REALITY |
06 Dec 2007 01:14:11 AM |
|
|
On Thu, 6 Dec 2007 16:25:16 +1100, "Jeckyl"
<noone@nowhere.com> wrote:
[poster wrote]
No self-respecting editor would publish such crap.
[Hammond wrote]
You're a proven liar:
[Jeckyl wrote]
Really .. where is this proof?
[Hammond]
Poster said "no self-respecting editor would publish" my
work. Here's one that did, so the poster is proven to be a
LIAR:
Hammond G.E (1994) The Cartesian Theory, in
New Ideas In Psychology, Vol 12(2) 153-167
Pergamon Press. Online copy of peer/published
paper is posted at:
http://geocities.com/scientific_proof_of_god/cart.html
The EDITOR of that journal who PUBLISHED ME is a professor
at Colorado State University.
It is a PEER REVIEWED JOURNAL
It is published by PERGAMON PRESS which
is one of the world's LEADING academic publishers.
THEREFORE THE POSTER IS A PROVEN LIAR
and I said:
THEREFORE THE POSTER IS A PROVEN LIAR
========================================
SCIENTIFIC PROOF OF GOD WEBSITE
http://geocities.com/scientific_proof_of_god
mirror site:
http://proof-of-god.freewebsitehosting.com
GOD=G_uv (a folk song on mp3)
http://interrobang.jwgh.org/songs/hammond.mp3
========================================
.
|
|
|
| User: "Jeckyl" |
|
| Title: Re: GOD IS A CURVATURE OF REALITY |
06 Dec 2007 05:44:00 AM |
|
|
"George Hammond" <Nowhere1@notspam.org> wrote in message
news:or7fl3lr2vvihe6ne3rqdts3s0681qqdm1@4ax.com...
On Thu, 6 Dec 2007 16:25:16 +1100, "Jeckyl"
<noone@nowhere.com> wrote:
[poster wrote]
No self-respecting editor would publish such crap.
[Hammond wrote]
You're a proven liar:
[Jeckyl wrote]
Really .. where is this proof?
[Hammond]
Poster said "no self-respecting editor would publish" my
work. Here's one that did, so the poster is proven to be a
LIAR:
No .. you have to prove that the puplisher is self-respecting. Your article
is crap. Whoever published it must have been desperate to fill space or not
reviewew the ***** the you wrote.
Now .. ***** .. there's a good loony.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Jeckyl" |
|
| Title: Re: GOD IS A CURVATURE OF REALITY |
06 Dec 2007 05:50:14 AM |
|
|
"Jeckyl" <noone@nowhere.com> wrote in message
news:13lfo43h0maj6d6@corp.supernews.com...
"George Hammond" <Nowhere1@notspam.org> wrote in message
news:or7fl3lr2vvihe6ne3rqdts3s0681qqdm1@4ax.com...
On Thu, 6 Dec 2007 16:25:16 +1100, "Jeckyl"
<noone@nowhere.com> wrote:
[poster wrote]
No self-respecting editor would publish such crap.
[Hammond wrote]
You're a proven liar:
[Jeckyl wrote]
Really .. where is this proof?
[Hammond]
Poster said "no self-respecting editor would publish" my
work. Here's one that did, so the poster is proven to be a
LIAR:
No .. you have to prove that the puplisher is self-respecting. Your
article is crap. Whoever published it must have been desperate to fill
space or not reviewew the ***** the you wrote.
Now .. ***** .. there's a good loony.
Also note that the article you claim is published is not your ridiculous
proofs of god's existence .. perhaps that article was written when you were
still sane and able to think rationally. Those days are obviously long gone
... what a waste of a mind.
.
|
|
|
| User: "George Hammond" |
|
| Title: Re: GOD IS A CURVATURE OF REALITY |
06 Dec 2007 12:37:10 PM |
|
|
On Thu, 6 Dec 2007 22:50:14 +1100, "Jeckyl"
<noone@nowhere.com> wrote:
[SNIP..... NO CONTENT]
========================================
SCIENTIFIC PROOF OF GOD WEBSITE
http://geocities.com/scientific_proof_of_god
mirror site:
http://proof-of-god.freewebsitehosting.com
GOD=G_uv (a folk song on mp3)
http://interrobang.jwgh.org/songs/hammond.mp3
========================================
.
|
|
|
| User: "Jeckyl" |
|
| Title: Re: GOD IS A CURVATURE OF REALITY |
06 Dec 2007 04:12:46 PM |
|
|
"George Hammond" <Nowhere1@notspam.org> wrote in message
news:n9ggl3tstgnuq229roq95bdc03so7rkcoa@4ax.com...
Snip .. no sanity
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "George Hammond" |
|
| Title: Re: GOD IS A CURVATURE OF REALITY |
06 Dec 2007 12:36:29 PM |
|
|
On Thu, 6 Dec 2007 22:44:00 +1100, "Jeckyl"
<noone@nowhere.com> wrote:
[snip.... no content]
========================================
SCIENTIFIC PROOF OF GOD WEBSITE
http://geocities.com/scientific_proof_of_god
mirror site:
http://proof-of-god.freewebsitehosting.com
GOD=G_uv (a folk song on mp3)
http://interrobang.jwgh.org/songs/hammond.mp3
========================================
.
|
|
|
| User: "Jeckyl" |
|
| Title: Re: GOD IS A CURVATURE OF REALITY |
06 Dec 2007 04:12:56 PM |
|
|
"George Hammond" <Nowhere1@notspam.org> wrote in message
news:k8ggl3hp5pmsl3006bph8ioovtlg3fggci@4ax.com...
Snip .. no sanity
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Paul Hovnanian P.E." |
|
| Title: Re: GOD IS A CURVATURE OF REALITY |
06 Dec 2007 04:53:12 PM |
|
|
George Hammond wrote:
On Thu, 6 Dec 2007 16:25:16 +1100, "Jeckyl"
<noone@nowhere.com> wrote:
[poster wrote]
No self-respecting editor would publish such crap.
[Hammond wrote]
You're a proven liar:
[Jeckyl wrote]
Really .. where is this proof?
[Hammond]
Poster said "no self-respecting editor would publish" my
work. Here's one that did, so the poster is proven to be a
LIAR:
Hammond G.E (1994) The Cartesian Theory, in
New Ideas In Psychology, Vol 12(2) 153-167
Pergamon Press. Online copy of peer/published
paper is posted at:
http://geocities.com/scientific_proof_of_god/cart.html
Why is your paper published by a journal on psycology?
--
Paul Hovnanian mailto:Paul@Hovnanian.com
------------------------------------------------------------------
Answer: Eight. Twelve if the light bulb is cross-threaded.
.
|
|
|
| User: "pico pico.pico.pico" |
|
| Title: Re: GOD IS A CURVATURE OF REALITY |
07 Dec 2007 11:51:22 AM |
|
|
"Paul Hovnanian P.E." <paul@hovnanian.com> wrote in message
news:47587D58.D0F037D2@hovnanian.com...
Why is your paper published by a journal on psycology?(sic)
It's a journal that accepts broad-field work that relates to psychology.
Specifically it was in the journal entitled,
"New Ideas in Psychology"
"An International Journal of Innovative Theory in Psychology"
Note the journal's statement of purpose:
"New Ideas in Psychology is a journal for theoretical psychology in its
broadest sense. We are looking for new and seminal ideas, from within
Psychology and from other fields that have something to bring to Psychology.
We welcome presentations and criticisms of theory, of background
metaphysics, and of fundamental issues of method, both empirical and
conceptual. We put special emphasis on the need for informed discussion of
psychological theories to be interdisciplinary. Empirical papers are
accepted at New Ideas in Psychology, but only as long as they focus on
conceptual issues and are theoretically creative. We are also open to
comments or debate, interviews, and book reviews."
NOTE especially "Empirical papers are accepted at New Ideas in Psychology,
but only as long as they focus on conceptual issues and are theoretically
creative."
That's about theory, not proof. Theory not empiricism. And sometimes not
even theory, but conceptualisms.
NO PROOF HERE
Keep moving, folks.
.
|
|
|
| User: "George Hammond" |
|
| Title: Re: GOD IS A CURVATURE OF REALITY |
07 Dec 2007 01:36:28 PM |
|
|
On Fri, 7 Dec 2007 11:51:22 -0600, "pico" <pico.pico.pico>
wrote:
"Paul Hovnanian P.E." <paul@hovnanian.com> wrote in message
news:47587D58.D0F037D2@hovnanian.com...
Why is your paper published by a journal on psycology?(sic)
It's a journal that accepts broad-field work that relates to psychology.
Specifically it was in the journal entitled,
"New Ideas in Psychology"
"An International Journal of Innovative Theory in Psychology"
Note the journal's statement of purpose:
"New Ideas in Psychology is a journal for theoretical psychology in its
broadest sense. We are looking for new and seminal ideas, from within
Psychology and from other fields that have something to bring to Psychology.
We welcome presentations and criticisms of theory, of background
metaphysics, and of fundamental issues of method, both empirical and
conceptual. We put special emphasis on the need for informed discussion of
psychological theories to be interdisciplinary. Empirical papers are
accepted at New Ideas in Psychology, but only as long as they focus on
conceptual issues and are theoretically creative. We are also open to
comments or debate, interviews, and book reviews."
NOTE especially "Empirical papers are accepted at New Ideas in Psychology,
but only as long as they focus on conceptual issues and are theoretically
creative."
That's about theory, not proof. Theory not empiricism. And sometimes not
even theory, but conceptualisms.
NO PROOF HERE
Keep moving, folks.
[Hammond]
Sorry overprivileged acadmic lackey..... the "folks" are
NOT moving on. They smell the blood of elite atheistic
academia in the water and that's good news-- what they're
beginning to suspect is that one of "theirs" has DISCOVERED
the world's first scientific proof of God and it's a
HISTORIC EMBARRESSMENT TO ATHISTIC ACADEMIA that a middle
class nobody living in a homeless shelter oppressed by all
of them HAS FOUND IT! And believe me are they going to rub
academe's nose in it!
You said:
That's about theory, not proof. Theory not empiricism. And sometimes not
even theory, but conceptualisms.
YOU'RE A LIAR.... a copy of the published paper itsefl is
posted (FULLY ILLUSTRATED) at:
http://geocities.com/scientific_proof_of_god/cart.html
as anyone can PLAINLY SEE WITH THEIR OWN EYES the paper is
TOTALLY EXPERIMENTALLY PROVEN with THOUSANDS of peer
published EXPERIMENTAL RESULTS to substantiate it.
YOU'RE AN ACADEMIC LACKEY BROWN NOSER AND A LIAR....!!!!!
========================================
SCIENTIFIC PROOF OF GOD WEBSITE
http://geocities.com/scientific_proof_of_god
mirror site:
http://proof-of-god.freewebsitehosting.com
GOD=G_uv (a folk song on mp3)
http://interrobang.jwgh.org/songs/hammond.mp3
========================================
.
|
|
|
| User: "Paul Hovnanian P.E." |
|
| Title: Re: GOD IS A CURVATURE OF REALITY |
08 Dec 2007 01:09:59 PM |
|
|
George Hammond wrote:
[snip]
YOU'RE A LIAR.... a copy of the published paper itsefl is
posted (FULLY ILLUSTRATED) at:
http://geocities.com/scientific_proof_of_god/cart.html
That's just your web site. The "New Ideas in Psychology" publication is
of far more interest.
as anyone can PLAINLY SEE WITH THEIR OWN EYES the paper is
TOTALLY EXPERIMENTALLY PROVEN with THOUSANDS of peer
published EXPERIMENTAL RESULTS to substantiate it.
Thousands of what? Psychologists? Now those diagnoses would certainly be
interesting reading.
--
Paul Hovnanian paul@hovnanian.com
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Procrastinators: The leaders for tomorrow.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
