GOD=G_uv THE 2 WORLDS OF RELATIVITIY



[George E. Hammond]
This post concerns some preliminary thoughts on
the notion that human growth can be modelled
as a "conformal expansion" of spacetime.





"In the beginning God created
the heaven and the earth."

(Genesis 1:1 KJV)





This historic passage is among one of the world's oldest recorded
reference to the existence of "2 realities" .... or what modern
Science would call, the "2 spacetimes of Relativity".



As you know, Relativity is the study of "spacetime".



In fact, as far as Science is concerned, spacetime IS reality,
i.e. :

spacetime = reality



However, modern research (Hammond 2003) has revealed that there
are actually TWO SPACETIMES relevant to what we call "reality".



These 2-spacetimes are commonly referred to as "objective reality"
and "subjective reality".


In fact, it turns out that:

1. SCIENCE is the study of objective reality.
2. RELIGION is the study of subjective reality.



In fact, the entire notion of "God" is due to the fact
that subjective reality has a different size and speed
than objective reality and the difference between the
two is commonly called "GOd".
This difference is caused by the incomplete growth of
the body, something known as the Secular Trend in human
growth.

-----------------



According to Hammond's discovery of the Scienctific Proof
of God (known as the S.P.O.G. for short):

Hammond G.E.(2003) A Semiclassical Theory of God
Noetic Journal, Vol 4(3) July 2003, pp 231-244(Noetic Press)
Online copy at:
http://geocities.com/scientific_proof_of_god/Hammond5s1.html


Hammmond has discovered that what we call "subjective reality" is a
CURVED VERSION of "objective reality". This curvature is caused by
the Secular Trend in human growth which shows that no human being
is fully grown, and therefore no one's brain is fully grown
and this causes our subjective reality to be a curved version of
actual objective reality (true reality). The above published paper
explains all this, as well as the simple introductory pages of
my website, URL below.


At any rate, the question has arisen as to whether this "curved
version" of reality could be modelled as a "spacetime expansion"
of our subjective world relative to the objective world.

In this model we could consider childhood growth to be something
like a "Big Bang expansion", whereby the human body begins as a
single cell at conception, and during the first 18 years of life
"expands" to become 6' tall. Meanwhile, as is commonly known,
the objective world appears to become smaller and smaller, and
the speed of this world becomes slower and slower, due to our
increasing mental speed (a.k.a. intelligence).

It has been hypothesized that this could be modelled as a
"conformal expansion" where the well known conformal metric
would apply:

ds^2 = a(t)^2 [dR^2 - dt^2]

where:

a(t) = the cosmic expansion factor
t = the conformal time (t=a(t)t')

This "conformal metric" is well known to Relativity,
(see _Gravity_ Hartle 2003 Addison Wesley p382 eqn 18.45)



Now, the first thing to consider is this:

In the classic "slow speed, weakfield" model (i.e. the late stages
of the cosmic expansion), the Stress energy Tensor is taken to be:

| 0 0 0 0 |
| 0 0 0 0 | = T_uv = G_uv
| 0 0 0 0 |
| 0 0 0 rho |

where "rho" = the mass density of the Universe

while the corresponding tensor in Psychometric (subjective)
space is given by:

| 0 0 0 0 |
| 0 0 0 0 | = T_uv = G_uv
| 0 0 0 0 |
| 0 0 0 BGD |

where "BGD" = the childhood growth brain growth deficit.


As is well known, the cosmological model corresponding to the
first equation above is the "Big Bang" model where rho runs
from infinity to zero, corresponding to an expansion of
space (Hubble expansion) from 0 size to infinite size.


Now we immediately see a problem. While the BGD clearly goes to
zero in Psychometry space as one approaches full growth, the mass
density in cosmology only approaches zero for an infinite space,
a(t)=infinity.
But we know the human body does not become infinitely large.. in
fact it reaches a finite size and stops growing... while for rho=0
real space has expanded to an INFINITE size! How can we model
growth then as an expansion of space, since body siZe is finite
and space is infinite?

The answer to this dilemma, I believe, lies in the fact that we are
now dealing essentially with the COMPARISON of two different spaces.
We are comparing the size of subjective space to objective space.
In that case, only the relative "magnification" between the two has
any physical meaning... the actual dimensions of the spaces being
meaningless.


In other words, the
growth of the body (that is, the concommitent shrinking of the size
of the apparent world) is actually a "magnification", and not an
expansion, directly. In other words, it is the "apparent
magnification"
of the size of reality that is occuring as we grow.


Now, "magnification" is known to be the RATIO of two sizes. In this
case the RATIO of the size of the subjective world compared to the
objective world. In other words, it does not matter if real space is
considered to be "flat and infinite".
The only thing that matters is the "magnification ratio" between
objective and subjective space. Hence, when the BGD reaches zero,
the magnification=1; meaning that subjective space=objective space
when Man reaches full growth.

There is in other words, a "magnification factor" of subjective space
relative to objective space. This would be for instance the length
of an adults foot divided by the length of a childs foot... this is
the
same as the "apparent length" of a ruler as seen by and adult in ratio
to the "apparent length" of the same ruler seen by a child.

The metric of "subjective space" is then properly given by:


ds^2 = A(t)^2 [ dR^2 - dt^2}

where A(t) is the "expansion" of subjective reality".


Hence A(t) ranges from 0 to infinity as BGD goes from 1
to 0 (since rho = BGD/(1-BGD) see note 3 p 243, my paper
http://geocities.com/scientific_proof_of_god/Hammond5s1.html )


The "magnification" then is given by

a(t)
---- = M(t)
A(t)


Now a(t) is already equal to infinity for an infinite
flat real space. While A(t) ranges from 0 to infinity,
as the BGD ranges from 1 --> 0 (since rho = BGC/(1-BGD)


this means that the magnification, M(t)=a(t)/A(t) ranges from:

a(t)
--- ranges from (infty/0)=infty to (infty/infty)=1
A(t)


i.e. M(t) ranges from infinity-->1


===========================
SO THE CONCLUSION IS:

YES..... childhood growth CAN be modelled as a "Big Bang expansion"
of "subjective reality".

To be noted however, is that while we can model childhood growth
and it's explansion of subjective reality as a "relativistic
expansion of subjective space" governed by Einstein's field Equations
... we must remember that the Big Bang so called is a THERMAL
EXPLOSION, while the growth of the brain is certainly not a
thermal explosion phenomenon. It is in fact a biological growth
mechanism; details unknown. So while the exact mechanism of
the expansion of subjective space is NOT known in detail, while
the expansion of real space is known in quite elaborate detail,
NONETHELESS, it has now been demonstrated that the growth of
subjective reality during childhood is CLEARLY a Relativistic
"expansion of space" that is in fact governed by Einstein's
theory.

This is simply more evidence that, "God is caused by gravity",
or God=G_uv.

PS... I must thank Dr. Stepehn Unwin PhD Gravity Physics,
and author of the clebrated new book, the Probability
of God, for first suggesting to me that childbirth might
be the result of a Big Bang.
===========================