| Topic: |
Religions > Atheism |
| User: |
"George Hammond" |
| Date: |
09 Apr 2004 09:57:37 AM |
| Object: |
Re: GOD=G_uv proof of MARY BAKER EDDY |
"Jeffrey Goldberg" <nobody@goldmark.org> wrote in message
news:107cepqkv8j8ued@corp.supernews.com...
[follow-up set to uk.philosophy.atheism]
George Hammond wrote:
SCIENTIFIC PROOF OF GOD WEBSITE
http://geocities.com/scientific_proof_of_god
And here is an excerpt from section two, titled
"How Psychology is caused by Relativity- which proves that
God is caused by Gravity"
Hans Eysenck proposed that the model had 3 dimensions which he called
Extraversion, Neuroticism and Psychoticism, [...]
The problem was that no one could explain WHY personality structure
should be 3 dimensional. Then in 1994 Hammond discovered and
published the explanation.
Hammond pointed out that the human brain is actually cleaved by 3
orthogonal planes [...] Each of these cleavages causes one of the
dimension ENP. [...]
It turns out that the 3-axis cleavage of the brain is not
accidental. The entire human body has a 3-axis cleavage structure.
So there we have it.
[GH]
Not quite.
One psychologist came up with a three diminsions
for personality (other psychologists talk about 5, but lets not let that
fact get in the way).
[GH]
No lets not let it get away. My theory explains
ALL PUBLISHED MODELS, including:
1. Eysenck's Big-3 (ENP)
2. Clarke's AVA 4-Factor Model
3. The "Big-5" Model (Norman, Goldberg, Costa-McCrae)
4. Brand's Big-6 Model
5. Cattell's 7-Factor 2nd order result
6. Saucier's 9-Factor (Dodecohedral) model
7. Cattell's 13-2nd order (extended) result.
HAMMOND has discovered that the STRUCTURAL MODEL
so called, is a ctually a CUBE. A cube as all physicists know,
has 13 AXES of symmetry, and of course has
3 PRINCIPAL AXES.
1. The 3-Principle Axes are Eysenck's ENP.
2. If you lower the resolution in experiemntal
Factor Analysis, you will get, successively,
3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12 and 13 factor results.
SO- HAMMOND'S discovery has confirmed that
EVERYONE IS RIGHT
and all the models are correct...... they are simply
all of the possible "geometrical redactions" of the
13-symmetry axes of a CUBE.
This result was published by HAMMOND in the
peer reviewed literature in 1994, and a copy of
the paper is posted on my website.
This monumental result by the way, is known as
"the discovery of the structural model" in Psychology.
AND... it is indubitably an OVERWHELMING
confirmation of Hammond's later discovery, of
a SCIENTIFIC PROOF OF GOD.
And, guess this! The human body has a three
diminsional structure.
[GH]
Whoa professor..... any idiot knows it's 3-dimensional,
what you DON'T KNOW is that it is ""mirror symmetric"
(anatomically/structurally) along all three of those dimensions!
With all due respect, I suggest that George Hammond have himself checked
out for Eysenck's "P" dimension.
[GH]
With all due respect, I'd suggest to you that "a little bit
of knowledge is dangerous", and that maybe you'd
better study a little more deeply what you're talking about.
All you know about is the tip of the iceberg.
--
Jeffrey Goldberg http://www.goldmark.org/jeff/
====================================
SCIENTIFIC PROOF OF GOD WEBSITE
http://geocities.com/scientific_proof_of_god
mirror site:
http://proof-of-god.freewebsitehosting.com
====================================
.
|
|
| User: "Kevin Anthoney" |
|
| Title: Re: GOD=G_uv proof of MARY BAKER EDDY |
09 Apr 2004 11:13:20 AM |
|
|
George Hammond wrote:
"Jeffrey Goldberg" <nobody@goldmark.org> wrote in message
news:107cepqkv8j8ued@corp.supernews.com...
[follow-up set to uk.philosophy.atheism]
And, guess this! The human body has a three
diminsional structure.
[GH]
Whoa professor..... any idiot knows it's 3-dimensional,
what you DON'T KNOW is that it is ""mirror symmetric"
(anatomically/structurally) along all three of those dimensions!
Correct me if I'm wrong, but that would mean your top half is the same as
your bottom half. I find that highly unlikely.
--
Kevin Anthoney
kanthoney[a]dsl.pipex.com
.
|
|
|
| User: "graham" |
|
| Title: Re: GOD=G_uv proof of MARY BAKER EDDY |
09 Apr 2004 11:26:17 AM |
|
|
"Kevin Anthoney" <kevin_anthoney@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:56fdd$4076cba1$51569c09$20122@nf3.news-service-com...
George Hammond wrote:
"Jeffrey Goldberg" <nobody@goldmark.org> wrote in message
news:107cepqkv8j8ued@corp.supernews.com...
[follow-up set to uk.philosophy.atheism]
And, guess this! The human body has a three
diminsional structure.
[GH]
Whoa professor..... any idiot knows it's 3-dimensional,
what you DON'T KNOW is that it is ""mirror symmetric"
(anatomically/structurally) along all three of those dimensions!
Correct me if I'm wrong, but that would mean your top half is the same as
your bottom half. I find that highly unlikely.
Does that imply that he must be talking out of his arse?
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "George Hammond" |
|
| Title: Re: GOD=G_uv proof of MARY BAKER EDDY |
09 Apr 2004 03:34:31 PM |
|
|
"Kevin Anthoney" <kevin_anthoney@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:56fdd$4076cba1$51569c09$20122@nf3.news-service-com...
George Hammond wrote:
"Jeffrey Goldberg" <nobody@goldmark.org> wrote in message
news:107cepqkv8j8ued@corp.supernews.com...
[follow-up set to uk.philosophy.atheism]
And, guess this! The human body has a three
diminsional structure.
[GH]
Whoa professor..... any idiot knows it's 3-dimensional,
what you DON'T KNOW is that it is ""mirror symmetric"
(anatomically/structurally) along all three of those dimensions!
Correct me if I'm wrong, but that would mean your top half is the same as
your bottom half. I find that highly unlikely.
[GH]
The somites of the body are identical... for instance the
vertebrae in the spinal column are examples of this.
these are caused by the elemental cleavage of the egg in the first
few cell cleavages and continuing on thereafter. The brain
is cleaved transversly just like the spinal column.
But before we get into an undergraducate education in anatomy,
let me point out that I have 3 kinds of adversaries attacking my
discovery:
1. Amateurs
2. Fools
3. Hypocrites
in that order. You of course are an "amateur". It is senseless to
argue with an amateur for the same reason adults do not argue with
children. The opinion of amateurs is meaningless. The only thing
an amateur has to offer is an "attitude", i.e. either
1. argumentative and non constructive
2. neutral and ambivalent
3. inquiring and constructive
again, you fall in the lowest catagory... and I am certainly not going to
waste my breath arguing with you.
I do of course appreciate the fact that you have at
least "something of substance" which is more than the
average critic has to offer.
On the higher level, "fools" would apply to PhD level authorities
who are ignorant of what God is (usually due to sacrificing their entire
lives s;tudying something else, like Cancer or Mathematical
Physics).. but who are aggrevated and incautious and don't
know enough to be careful.
The "hypocrits" of course are very high level authorities
in various scientific fields who actually know there is something
to it (religion) but just don't care. Those people i will argue
with to a certain extent, but in the end only sheer numbers
in public opinion ever gets rid of them.
Finally BTW, is the "heretic". i've never run into anyone
at a high enough level to be considered a "heretic".. but I'm
sure I'll meet one some day. At that time you will really see
the fur fly.
--
Kevin Anthoney
kanthoney[a]dsl.pipex.com
====================================
SCIENTIFIC PROOF OF GOD WEBSITE
http://geocities.com/scientific_proof_of_god
mirror site:
http://proof-of-god.freewebsitehosting.com
====================================
.
|
|
|
| User: "luke" |
|
| Title: Re: GOD=G_uv proof of MARY BAKER EDDY |
23 Apr 2004 08:42:03 AM |
|
|
On Fri, 09 Apr 2004 20:34:31 GMT, "George Hammond"
<research137@hotmail.com> wrote:
[...] amateur [...]
[...]
at a high enough level to be considered a "heretic"..
Heretic-
"A person who holds controversial opinions, especially one who
publicly dissents from the officially accepted dogma of the Roman
Catholic Church."
Sorry George, I worship only Gamma_a_b_c and R_a_b_c_d. You
square-heads have been watching too much of the box and spending too
much time in rectangular prisms.
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: GOD=G_uv proof of MARY BAKER EDDY |
09 Apr 2004 11:44:15 AM |
|
|
On Fri, 09 Apr 2004 17:13:20 +0100, Kevin Anthoney
<kevin_anthoney@hotmail.com> wrote:
George Hammond wrote:
"Jeffrey Goldberg" <nobody@goldmark.org> wrote in message
news:107cepqkv8j8ued@corp.supernews.com...
[follow-up set to uk.philosophy.atheism]
And, guess this! The human body has a three
diminsional structure.
[GH]
Whoa professor..... any idiot knows it's 3-dimensional,
what you DON'T KNOW is that it is ""mirror symmetric"
(anatomically/structurally) along all three of those dimensions!
Correct me if I'm wrong, but that would mean your top half is the same as
your bottom half. I find that highly unlikely.
Such a lovely straight line! I eagerly await appropriate follow-ups.
BW
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "HPMgourmet" |
|
| Title: Re: GOD=G_uv proof of MARY BAKER EDDY |
09 Apr 2004 02:37:40 PM |
|
|
On Fri, 09 Apr 2004 17:13:20 +0100, Kevin Anthoney wrote:
George Hammond wrote:
"Jeffrey Goldberg" <nobody@goldmark.org> wrote in message
news:107cepqkv8j8ued@corp.supernews.com...
[follow-up set to uk.philosophy.atheism]
And, guess this! The human body has a three
diminsional structure.
[GH]
Whoa professor..... any idiot knows it's 3-dimensional,
what you DON'T KNOW is that it is ""mirror symmetric"
(anatomically/structurally) along all three of those dimensions!
Correct me if I'm wrong, but that would mean your top half is the same as
your bottom half. I find that highly unlikely.
Hmm. Gives the whole 69 thing a bit of a miss.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
