"Mark K. Bilbo" <iskanipa-y@hoo.com> wrote in message
news:pan.2003.07.26.00.17.57.115996@eac.org...

On Fri, 25 Jul 2003 23:41:42 +0000, Nakas wrote:

"Mark K. Bilbo" <iskanipa-y@hoo.com> wrote in message
news:pan.2003.07.25.21.55.58.567344@eac.org...

On Fri, 25 Jul 2003 20:12:07 +0000, Nakas wrote:

"Mark K. Bilbo" <iskanipa-y@hoo.com> wrote in message
news:pan.2003.07.25.16.34.51.815219@eac.org...

On Fri, 25 Jul 2003 16:32:05 +0000, Nakas wrote:

"Mark K. Bilbo" <iskanipa-y@hoo.com> wrote in message
news:pan.2003.07.25.15.16.43.792077@eac.org...

On Fri, 25 Jul 2003 07:56:12 +0000, Nakas wrote:

"JTEM" <jaytem@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:mRSdnQlHW8-QQ72iXTWJjw@comcast.com...

"Mark K. Bilbo" <iskanipa-y@hoo.com> wrote

Interesting, too, that our own experts threw up there
hands and left, unable to find a damn thing...

One must find hope during these trying times... hope that

Rumsfeld

chooses a spot to plant some WMDs soon.

Why don't just just pick up a gun and start shooting at are
troops if

you

hate America so much?

*****. You.

Not liking--even hating--any particular administration is *NOT*
the

same

thing as hating the country. In fact, if you believe--as I
happen to--that the current powers that be are DESTRUCTIVE to
the country, NOT hating them is a betrayal of the country.

I am so FUCKING tired of the attempt by some to stifle
criticism of the Bush administration by conflating attitudes
toward them with attitudes toward the country. That's *****
and you KNOW it.

Or did all the Republicans who criticized and even impeached
Clinton "hate America?"

He has absolutely no evidence that Rumsfield would ever plant
evidence. He completly made it up because he hates our
government. I find that utterly traitorous. There's a
difference between criticism and slander. I haven't heard
someone so willing to slander our

country

since Baghdad Bob.

*****.

Even if it's slandering, it's against RUMSFELD who is NOTHING BUT
A PUBLIC SERVANT.

He is NOTHING but HIRED HELP.

Rumsfeld is NOT the US. Get that through your thick skull.

I know exactly what Rumsfeld is. And I'm perfectly fine with
people who criticise what he does. Hell, I think Bush let him off
his leash too. But I have a problem with people who completely
fabricate ***** about

him,

with not a scrap of evidence.

(As if the man isn't a pathological liar himself.)

To say that he will plant WMD in Iraq is a pure fucking
fabrication, and I find that utterly disgusting. There is not a
shred of evidence to support this. If there was evidence that

would

be different, in that case I thing bringing it forward would be the

right

thing to do. I know Rumsfeld is only a servant in the government,

but

I don't care how much you don't like his policies, you still
shouln't fabricate ***** about him (or anyone for that matter). I'm
sorry to

to

see

not one of you condemed this. I'm sorry none of you condemed a

blatently

fabricated and unsupported allegation made against one of the
highest officers of your country. Forgive me if I found that
unamerican.

*****.

For eight years it was perfectly acceptable to float wild accusations
about the president and people in the administration. Suddenly, it's
unpatriotic to make a catty remark on Usenet.

It's *****. Total, utter *****.

If Republicans can't take the heat, they should get out of politics.

Talk about double standard.

Just because other people made accusations about the last president
doesn't mean you have to lower yourself to their level. I condem any
false fabrications made by anyone about any of our presidents. It's
people with your vengful two-wrongs-make-a-right attitude that make
politics such a nasty business in the first place. Rise above it.

No, you grow up.

Somebody made a hyperbolic remark about Rummy which amounted to saying
the man is untrustworthy and you act as if they were trying to overthrow
the government.

Get a grip.

And I make a hyperbolic remark about JTEM attacking american soldiers
which amounted to saying that I thought JTEM was being unpatriotic and you
act as if I'm trying to repeal the first amendment.

Maybe you need to consider if you're the one who needs to get a grip.